The present disclosure relates to controlling hydraulic line pressure for a gearbox, or an automatic transmission.
Hydraulic line pressure is used to engage clutches to select gear ratios in automatic transmissions or other types of hydraulically controlled gear boxes. Line pressure is controlled to avoid clutch slippage and to minimize energy consumption resulting from maintaining excessive line pressure. Controlling the line pressure of an automatic transmission affects fuel economy, the ability to control the transmission, and drive quality.
Ideally, the line pressure should be maintained at a level that is sufficient to sustain the holding capacity of the engaged clutches. The hydraulic pump may waste energy if the hydraulic line pressure is excessive. In addition, excessive line pressure may make clutch valve control more difficult due to the higher gain caused by the excessive line pressure. If line pressure drops to less than the level necessary to prevent clutch slippage, disturbances in the driveline may occur. Clutch slippage may also lead to thermal damage to the clutch lining.
In prior production transmissions, input shaft torque is estimated that causes some uncertainty and inaccuracy in controlling line pressure. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,400,678 and 6,685,597 were considered in conjunction with the preparation of this patent application.
This disclosure is directed to solving the above problems and other problems that will be apparent in view of the following summary of the disclosure.
According to one aspect of this disclosure, a method is disclosed for commanding hydraulic pressure to engage a clutch. The method comprises periodically adjusting setting the hydraulic pressure in proportion to an input torque value based on a coefficient of proportionality, and increasing the coefficient of proportionality in response to a signal indicating a slip of the clutch so the hydraulic pressure is increased for all positive input torque values.
According to other aspects of the method, the hydraulic pressure is not adjusted in response to a signal indicating clutch slippage when the input torque is zero. The transmission may provide a finite number of discrete speed ratios between an input shaft and an output shaft, and the method may further comprise selecting a different coefficient of proportionality for some of the speed ratios.
The input torque value may be a measured input torque value in a steady state condition. The input torque value may be a maximum of the measured input torque value and a driver demand torque value in a transient condition. The difference between the driver demand torque value and the measured input torque value is recorded in a steady state condition. The difference between the driver demand torque value and the measured input torque value is added to the driver demand torque value in a transient condition.
The coefficient of proportionality may be decreased when the clutch is not slipping. The coefficient of proportionality may be decreased only when it is greater than a predetermined initial coefficient.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a transmission is provided that includes an input shaft, a clutch, the torque capacity of the clutch varying in relation to a hydraulic pressure, and a controller. The controller is in communication with pressure regulating devices that receive signals from the controller to influence the hydraulic pressure. The controller is configured to set the hydraulic pressure to a pressure value in proportion to an input torque value based upon a coefficient of proportionality. The coefficient of proportionality is increased in response to the detection of clutch slip events.
According to other aspects of the disclosure, the transmission may have a finite number of discrete speed ratios that are provided between an input shaft and an output shaft. The transmission may further comprise selecting a different coefficient of proportionality for some of the speed ratios.
According to other aspects of the disclosure as it relates to a transmission, the input torque value may be a measured input torque value in a steady state condition. The input torque value is a maximum of the measured input torque value and a driver demand torque value in a transient condition. In a steady state condition, the difference between the driver demand torque value and the measured input torque value is recorded. In a transient condition, the difference is added to the driver demand torque value.
This disclosure is also directed to a transmission controller that comprises input communication channels for sensing an input torque and the speeds of at least two shafts, output communication channels for setting the state of pressure regulating devices, and control logic for controlling the hydraulic pressure. The control logic is configured to send signals to the pressure regulating devices to set the hydraulic pressure to a pressure value. The pressure value includes a first term which is proportional to an input torque value, the term having a coefficient of proportionality. Clutch slip events are detected and coefficient of proportionality may be increased in response to the slip events.
According to other aspects of the disclosure relating to the transmission controller, the pressure value may include a second term that is independent of the input torque value. The input torque value may be a measured input torque value in a steady state condition. The coefficient of proportionality may be decreased when the clutch is not slipping. The coefficient of proportionality may be decreased only when it is greater than a predetermined initial coefficient.
The above aspects of this disclosure and other aspects will be better understood in view of the attached drawings and the following detailed description of the illustrated embodiments.
A detailed description of the illustrated embodiments of the present invention is provided below. The disclosed embodiments are examples of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale. Some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. The specific structural and functional details disclosed in this application are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art how to practice the invention.
Referring to
The electronic control unit 16 controls the transmission 10 by providing control signals to a valve body 26. A transmission pump 34 driven by the transmission input shaft 35 pressurizes hydraulic fluid entering the valve body 26. The valve body 26 includes one or more solenoids 28 that are used to actuate one or more valves 30 within the valve body 26. The pressure of the incoming fluid is called the line pressure and is controlled by electronic control unit 16 via the solenoids 28 and valves 30 in the valve body. The pump extracts mechanical energy from the input shaft, thereby increasing the amount of fuel required by the engine 12 to deliver a given amount of power to the driven load. Incremental fuel usage increases when line pressure increases.
The valve body 26 ports hydraulic fluid to a plurality of clutches 36 that are used to control a step ratio gear set 38. In some operating conditions, hydraulic fluid at line pressure is routed by valves to one of the clutches 36. In other operating conditions, valves may route hydraulic pressure at a reduced pressure to one of the clutches 36, with the reduced pressure controlled by the electronic control unit 16 via the solenoids 28 and valves 30.
The torque capacity of a clutch is a function of the hydraulic pressure supplied to that clutch by the valve body. The relationship between pressure and torque capacity is approximately linear with a proportional term and a constant term. The constant term and the coefficient of the proportional term are dictated by physical characteristics of the clutch. Some of these characteristics, such as coefficient of friction, may fluctuate during operation. The torque transmitted by a fully engaged clutch is approximately proportional to the input torque. Clutch slip occurs when the input torque is too high relative to the torque capacity of a clutch.
Referring to
The input shaft torque is measured at 48. Although the engine is controlled to deliver the driver demand torque, the measured input shaft torque can differ from the driver demand torque due to inherent delays or control system inconsistencies. An offset value may be added to the driver demand torque at 44 to compensate for this difference to yield an adjusted driver demand torque. This offset value is based on the observed difference during steady state conditions. At 50, the controller determines whether the current operating condition is a steady state condition by evaluating the magnitude of recent changes in measured input shaft torque and in driver demand torque. If a steady-state condition is detected at 50, then the steady-state offset is updated at 52. Otherwise, the previous value of the steady state offset is retained. The maximum anticipated input torque is computed at 56 by taking the maximum of the measured input torque and the adjusted driver demand torque.
The line pressure is calculated at 60 as a linear function of the maximum anticipated input torque. The constant term 62 in this linear function is a predetermined value based on the pressure required for the clutches to begin transmitting torque. This pressure may be different for each of the clutches 36. The value 62 is dictated by the largest value among the clutches that are applied in the current gear ratio and therefore may differ among the various gear ratios. The slope of the linear function is dictated by the slopes of the torque capacity functions for the engaged clutches in the current gear ratio and the ratio of clutch torque to input torque for each of these clutches in the current gear ratio. Because the torque capacity functions can fluctuate during operation, the slope of the linear function used at 60 is adaptively determined. A predetermined nominal slope 70 is used initially. The nominal slope 70 may differ among the various gear ratios.
Clutch slippage in the transmission is detected at 64 by sensors that provide clutch slippage data to the ECU 16. If a clutch slip is detected, the estimated slope is incrementally increased at 66. If no clutch is detected at 64, the algorithm determines whether the estimated slope is greater than the nominal line slope at 68. If the estimated slope is greater than the nominal slope at 68, the ECU decreases the estimated slope slightly at 72.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the disclosed apparatus and method. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as claimed. The features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the disclosed concepts.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4263826 | Hartz et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4502354 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4582185 | Grimes et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4706790 | Lockhart et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4875391 | Leising et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4907475 | Holbrook | Mar 1990 | A |
4938102 | Leising et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4982620 | Holbrook et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5115698 | Leising et al. | May 1992 | A |
5323668 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5400678 | Jain et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5443594 | Takada et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458545 | Adam et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5726353 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5776032 | Kurishige et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6022293 | Dourra et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039675 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6087734 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6319170 | Hubbard et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6487925 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6565483 | Segawa et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6658338 | Joe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685597 | Satou et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6754574 | Tokura et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
RE38790 | Maeda et al. | Sep 2005 | E |
7164981 | Kim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7302870 | Vilou et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7447582 | Mori et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8052577 | Tamba et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8100802 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8498765 | Tajima et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20030093207 | Pallot | May 2003 | A1 |
20040129096 | Vilou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20070288148 | Cui et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090171545 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248264 | Kubo | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090325757 | Dromard et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100108420 | Keiji | May 2010 | A1 |
20110035085 | Falkenstein | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112734 | Whitney et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112738 | Reuschel | May 2011 | A1 |
20110246036 | Tsutsui et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257856 | Tsutsui et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120226431 | Mitsuhashi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255294 | Heren et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120329588 | Iraha et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130012353 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130053214 | Kawai et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130116902 | Hodrus | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
404069451 | Mar 1992 | JP |
2010221954 | Oct 2010 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140081541 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |