Embodiments described herein generally relate to actuators for producing a haptic force, and more particularly to a resonant linear actuator that moves bidirectionally in response to electromagnetic motive forces.
Many modern portable electronic devices include actuators to provide alerts and notifications. As one common example, many mobile phones include a rotary vibration motor with an eccentric weight that spins rapidly in order to produce a vibration. This vibration may alert a user to an incoming telephone call when the phone is muted, for example. The vibration takes the place of the standard audio alert and may be felt by the user if he or she is touching the phone. However, the vibration may still be noisy in certain environments and this may be undesirable.
Further, many rotary mass actuators not only create an audible buzz, but also an undesirable feel. Because rotary mass actuators spin up to an operating state and then wind down to a rest state, they constantly shake the enclosure of the electronic device. This feels “buzzy” to a user and there is little, if any, control over the haptic output of such a device other than to control the amplitude of the output or to provide discrete outputs with an unacceptably long time between the outputs.
Certain linear actuators are used instead of rotary mass actuators in some electronic devices. Linear actuators may deliver a more crisp haptic output and are quieter in certain cases. However, many such linear actuators are relatively large and some may move a mass only in a single direction.
Accordingly, an improved linear actuator may be useful.
Embodiments described herein may take the form of a linear actuator capable of moving bidirectionally. Embodiments may provide a substantial haptic output resulting from relatively small motion of a mass within the actuator.
One embodiment may take the form of a linear actuator, comprising a mass assembly; a shaft passing through the mass assembly; and an electromagnetic structure operative to exert a motive force on the mass assembly, whereby the mass assembly may move along the shaft in response to the motive force; wherein the electromagnetic structure encircles at least a portion of the mass assembly when the mass assembly is in a rest state.
In certain example embodiments, the mass assembly comprises: a magnet array and a frame affixed to the magnet array; the electromagnetic structure encircles the magnet array when the mass assembly is in a rest state; and the frame extends around at least a portion of the electromagnetic structure. Further embodiments may use a wrapped coil as the electromagnetic structure, and position the coil such that it does not abut either the frame or the mass assembly.
Another embodiment may take the form of a linear actuator, comprising: a moving mass formed from a frame receiving a magnet array; a coil passing through the frame and around at least a portion of the magnet array; a shaft extending through the frame, the magnet array and the coil, the shaft spaced apart from each of the frame, the magnet array and the coil; a first spring positioned around the shaft at a first end of the shaft; a second spring positioned around the shaft at a second end of the shaft; and a case enclosing the moving mass, the coil, the shaft, and the first and second springs; wherein the shaft, the first spring and the second spring are all affixed to the case.
These and other embodiments, as well as the operations and uses thereof, will be apparent upon reading the specification in its entirety.
Embodiments described herein may take the form of an electromagnetic actuator that produces a haptic output during operation. Generally, an electromagnetic coil is wrapped around a central magnet array. A shaft passes through the central magnet array, such that the central array may move along the shaft when the proper force is applied.
When a current passes through the electromagnetic coil, the coil generates a magnetic field. The coil is stationary with respect to a housing of the actuator, while the central magnet array and an associated frame may move along the shaft within the housing. (The frame and array together form a mass assembly.) Thus, excitation of the coil exerts a force on the central magnet array, which moves in response to that force. The direction of the current through the coil determines the direction of the magnetic field and thus the motion of the central magnet array. It should be appreciated, however, that alternative embodiments may generate a motive force through other means, such as purely through the injection of flux into the coil by operation of injector magnets as described elsewhere herein.
Generally, the central magnet array may slide along the shaft in response to the magnetic field generated by the coil. The central magnet array may be placed within, coupled to, or otherwise associated with a weight, such as a frame, that also moves with the array. The frame adds mass to the central magnet array and so may provide a greater haptic output in response to motion than would the array alone.
One or more bearings, such as jewel bearings, may form the interface between the central magnet array and the shaft. The bearings may be shaped to reduce contact between the bearing interiors and the shaft, thereby reducing friction and permitting greater, and/or higher velocity, motion along the shaft by the central magnet array. Further, the shape of the bore through the bearings reduces the likelihood that the bearings and/or shaft are constrained, thereby avoiding binding and/or friction due to misalignment of portions of the actuator.
The shaft may be affixed to the housing of the actuator at both ends. A separate spring, such as a beehive (or double beehive) spring, may encircle each end of the shaft and abut both the interior of the housing and the frame. The springs may allow the coil and array (e.g., the mass assembly) to increase an amplitude of the array's motion with each excursion from a rest state and, also may prevent the frame from hitting or crashing into the housing. Further, the springs may return the mass assembly to its rest position at or near the center of the housing. In some embodiments, the springs may cooperate with the coil's magnetic field to return the central magnet array/mass assembly to its rest position.
The frame's motion, and changes in direction of motion, is transmitted to the housing of the actuator as a force. Accordingly, as the frame moves and/or changes direction, the housing experiences forces that cause it to move. This motion may be felt or otherwise sensed by a person holding or otherwise in contact with the actuator; the motion may thus provide a haptic output sensed by the user/wearer. Typically, the greater the momentum of the central magnet array and frame, the greater the force exerted on the housing in a short period of time and the greater the magnitude of the haptic output.
Certain embodiments may employ a set of injector magnets positioned on opposing sides or faces of the frame. The injector magnets may be adjacent or otherwise near stabilization rails, which may likewise be magnetic (or, in some embodiments, may be ferritic). Magnetic attraction between the injector magnets and the stabilization rails may prevent the frame from rotating during its lateral motion along the shaft. Further, because the injector magnets and stabilization rails need not touch one another, they may not generate friction that would otherwise oppose the lateral motion of the frame along the shaft. This lack of friction may permit the frame to reach higher velocities in the same amount of travel, thereby generating a greater haptic output than if friction-inducing stabilizing structures were employed.
Generally, and as described below, the injector magnets, stabilization rails, and at least portions of the housing may create magnetic return paths that control and/or focus the magnetic flux of the central magnet array and/or the coil. These magnetic return paths may reduce the amount of flux that extends beyond the housing and thereby enhance the magnetic field within the housing that, in turn, may enhance the velocity that the central magnet array may reach within a given period of time or given distance of travel. The injector magnets (described below) may likewise exert an electromotive force on the central magnet array, enhancing or adding to that generated by the coil and thus enhancing the overall operation of the actuator.
Typically, although not necessarily, the sample electronic device 100 may include a number of different components within the exterior housing 110. Sample components include one or more processing units (which may be multithreaded or multicore), memory and/or other data storage, one or more batteries, physical support structures, sensors (including position, acceleration, gyroscopic, ambient light, motion, audio, and so on), cameras, speakers, microphones, and the like. These components are not illustrated in
Likewise, a user, wearer or other entity may access from one or more input mechanisms from outside the housing 110. For example, an input button 120 is shown in
Turning now to
The linear actuator 200 may be relatively compact, making it particularly suitable for use in small electronic devices. In one embodiment, the volume of the actuator (e.g., the volume of the case and all space inside the case) is no more than 568 cubic millimeters.
A stiffener 240 may be affixed or otherwise placed on the bracket 230. The stiffener 240 may be adhered, welded, mechanically fastened, or otherwise connected to the bracket 230. The stiffener 240 may strengthen the bracket 230. By stiffening the bracket 230, the stiffener 240 may permit more motion of the moving mass assembly and associated frame to be transmitted to the housing 110 to which the bracket 230 is affixed.
A flex 250 may extend through the case 220 to provide electrical connections for components within the case 220. Some embodiments may omit the flex 250 and may instead provide electrical contacts on the exterior of the case 220, or may use a rigid connector in place of the flex 250.
The case 220 may be formed from multiple sidewalk that are attached or affixed to one another or may be formed as an integral unit that is bent or otherwise formed into the shape of the case 220. As shown in
As depicted in
As shown to best effect in
As shown to best effect in
Generally, when the coil 300 is energized, it creates a magnetic field. The opposing polarities of the magnets 400, 410 generate a radial magnetic field (as illustrated by the radial magnetic field 500 in
Accordingly, when the coil is energized, the central magnet array 310 will slide along the shaft 320 in one direction or its opposite, depending on the polarity of the field. If the current through the coil 300 is sufficiently high, the central magnet array and associated frame 330 will move rapidly and reach a high velocity. If the coil is de-energized before the central magnet array moves too far (for example, before the central magnet array no longer underlies the coil), then the Lorentz force exerted on the central magnet array is reduced to zero and the frame/magnet array may continue to move.
In some embodiments, after a target velocity or displacement is reached the coil may be energized in a direction opposite its energization. This may cause the generated magnetic field to exert a force in a direction opposite the initial motion of the central magnet array and/or frame, thereby slowing down or braking the moving mass assembly. This may be useful to control or limit oscillation, especially at or near a resonance frequency of the linear actuator 200, or to maintain such a resonance frequency. Accordingly, the coil 300 can not only “pull” but can also “push” the moving mass assembly, hereby imparting motive force in two opposing directions through selective application of the coil's magnetic field. This may permit fine control over motion and/or velocity of the frame 330 and central magnet array 310, both in multiple directions and when compared to other linear actuators.
Turning now to
It should be appreciated that the jewel bearings 430 may have other surface configurations designed to reduce contact and/or friction between the bearings and the shaft and to reduce the likelihood of binding and/or friction resulting from misaligned components. For example, the inner surface of the bearings may be angled, elliptical, or the like. In addition, bearings other than jewel bearings 430 may be used in different embodiments.
The shaft 320 has been generally discussed with respect to the motion of the central magnet array 310 and frame 330. The shaft 320 may be affixed to opposing sidewalls of the case 220, as generally shown in
Generally, the shaft passes through the central magnet array 310, including the center interface 420 and both magnets 400, 410. The shaft 320 likewise passes through the frame 330, which is affixed to the central magnet array (and, in some embodiments, more particularly to the magnets 400, 410). The shaft extends through a spring 510 at either of the shaft's ends before passing through the case 220, or otherwise being affixed to the case 220.
Typically, although not necessarily, the shaft 320 defines a central axis along one direction of the linear actuator 200. As illustrated in
As previously mentioned and as also illustrated in 5, each end of the shaft 320 passes through a spring 510. In the embodiment shown in
The double beehive springs 510 typically abut or are affixed to both an inner surface of the case 220 and a side of the frame 330. Thus, as the frame 330 and central magnet array 310 move along the shaft in response to a Lorentz force generated through the interaction of the magnetic flux of the central magnet array and the current through the coil, one double beehive spring 510 structure expands and one compresses from its nominal rest state. When fully compressed, the windings of the double beehive spring 510 lie flat within a plane. The pitch between the windings of the spring may vary in order to accommodate the windings in a flat, coplanar position upon compression. Further, by sizing both springs to always be in compression, the springs act intandem to double the spring rate. Additionally, the compression springs may not require attachment or affixing to a sidewall or other part of the actuator, thereby avoiding possible complexities, variability and stresses caused by such attachment.
Accordingly, the double beehive spring 510 may be space-efficient and designed to occupy a minimum volume when fully compressed. By reducing the volume or the springs when in a compressed state, or at least their thickness along a dimension parallel to the shaft 320, the distance the moving mass assembly may move along the shaft, the size of the central magnet array 310, and/or the amount of mass may be increased when compared to a spring that does not collapse to place its windings within a plane.
The springs 510 may prevent the frame 330 from impacting a sidewall of the case 220 when the frame 330 moves at a high velocity or enjoys a large displacement. Further, the coil 300 may be energized in order to move the frame 330 and central magnet array 310 along the shaft 320, thereby further compressing one of the springs 510. (It should be appreciated that the springs 510 are always in compression in the depicted embodiment). Current may be maintained through the coil 300 to bias the central magnet array 310 and frame 330 into a displaced position, thereby further compressing a spring 510 and storing energy in the spring. When current to the coil is terminated, the external force exerted on the central magnet array 310 may likewise terminate. In response the spring 510 may expand, propelling the moving mass assembly away from the spring 510 and along the shaft 320. Current may flow through the coil 300 at the appropriate time to impart more motive force to the moving mass assembly, thereby increasing the velocity of the assembly and enhancing the haptic output generated by this moving element. Accordingly, the springs 510 may be used to convert kinetic energy to potential energy, thereby enabling the actuator to achieve a greater amplitude of momentum across multiple cycles of operation, and so create an enhanced or increased haptic sensation for a user or wearer when compared to the haptic sensation that may be (at least initially) experienced if the moving mass assembly is in the neutral, or rest, position as illustrated in
Embodiments of a linear actuator 200, as described herein, may include one or more injector magnets 600, as shown in
A pair of rails 610 may be affixed to an interior of the case 220 and positioned such that each rail 610 is generally near an injector magnet 600. The rails 610 may be magnetic, in which case their polarities match the polarities of the nearby injector magnets (e.g., magnetic attraction exists between each rail 610 and the nearby injector magnet). Alternatively, the rails 610 may be made of a ferritic material but may not be magnets themselves, such that the injector magnets 600 are attracted to the rails 610. In alternative embodiments, the rails 610 may be magnetic and the injector magnets may be replaced with ferritic masses. The arrows shown on the injector magnets and rails in
The injector magnets 600 serves three purposes, namely to stabilize the moving mass assembly during motion along the shaft, such that the assembly does not rotate substantially about the shaft, to provide additional flux through the coil 300 (and so increase the motive force acting on the moving mass assembly) and also to provide a magnetic flux path for the magnetic fields generated by the coil and central magnet array. The first purpose will be initially discussed. It should be appreciated that the double-headed arrow shown in
The convex shape of the injector magnet 600 helps ensure that the outermost part of the injector magnet 600 (e.g., the part closest to the rail 610) is attracted to the rail 610. Further, if the frame 330 assembly rotates or spins about the shaft 320 during movement such that it is angularly misaligned, the convex shape of the exterior portion of the inject magnet reduces the likelihood that the injector magnet will be attracted to any ferritic or magnetic portion of the case 220, as compared to an injector magnet having a rectangular or square cross-section. Rather, the attraction between the injector magnet 600 and rail 610 tends to maintain the injector magnet's alignment with respect to the rail 610 in such a manner that the injector magnet remains substantially parallel to the rail 610, in the position shown in
This self-realigning action may prevent the frame 330 from binding on the shaft 320 and may maintain the frame and central magnet array 310 in a position with respect to the shaft that is configured for low-friction and/or lower-power motion of the frame along the shaft. Further, because the injector magnets 600 do not physically contact the rails 610, there is no friction between the two, thereby reducing the overall friction of the system while maintaining the roll stability and self-aligning features of the moving parts of the actuator (e.g., injector magnets 600, frame 330, and central magnet array 310).
Because the strength of a magnetic field varies non-linearly with the distance between two magnets, or a magnet and a ferritic material, the stabilization provided by the injector magnets 600 and rails 610 is non-linear. That is, the closer the injector magnets 600 are to their stable position (e.g, the position illustrated in
It should be appreciated that alternative embodiments may use a repulsive magnetic force, rather than an attractive magnetic force, to center the moving parts of the linear actuator 200 and prevent roll around the shaft 320. For example, magnetic rails 610 of polarities that oppose the polarities of the injector magnets 600 may be placed at the top and bottom of the case, substantially in vertical alignment with the injector magnets or along the joinder of the top of the case to a sidewall. Such magnetic rails 610 may repulse the injector magnets and cooperate to maintain the injector magnets in a stable position, so long as the strength of the magnetic fields is appropriately configured. Accordingly, embodiments are not limited to employing an attractive magnetic force to provide centering and stabilization.
The case 220 may be formed entirely from non-ferritic materials in certain embodiments, while in other embodiments the case 220 may be formed from a combination of ferritic and non-ferritic material. As one example and returning to
The flux return path serves to contain the magnetic flux and prevent leakage substantially beyond the case 220 of the linear actuator 200. For example, the radial magnetic field 500, shown in
In some embodiments, the frame 330 is formed from a ferritic tungsten alloy to another flux return path and also maintain a volume-to-mass efficiency (e.g., high mass per unit volume).
Although embodiments have been described herein with respect to particular structures, circuits and operations, it should be appreciated that alternative embodiments may vary any or all of the foregoing. For example, more than two magnets may be used to form the central magnet array. Likewise, multiple coils may be used to enhance electromotive force operating on the central magnet array. The width and/or shape of either or both of the central magnet array and the coil may be varied to adjust or change a force vs. distance profile of the actuator. In still other embodiments, additional magnets may be placed at either end of the case, such that the central magnet array and/or frame pass between these additional magnets while moving. The additional magnets may be polarized to provide a restoring force that assists in moving the frame and/or array back to its rest position. In still other embodiments, the coil may be flat (e.g., planar), rather than wound around the central magnet array.
Accordingly, the proper scope of protection is defined by the appended claims and is not limited to any particular example set forth herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/728,505, filed Jun. 2, 2015, and titled “Linear Actuator”, which is a nonprovisional patent application of and claims the benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/007,301 filed Jun. 3, 2014 and titled “Linear Actuator” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/044,881 filed Sep. 2, 2014 and titled “Linear Actuator,” all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety as if fully disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3001049 | Didier | Sep 1961 | A |
3390287 | Sonderegger | Jun 1968 | A |
3419739 | Clements | Dec 1968 | A |
4236132 | Zissimopoulos | Nov 1980 | A |
4412148 | Klicker et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4414984 | Zarudiansky | Nov 1983 | A |
4695813 | Nobutoki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4975616 | Park | Dec 1990 | A |
5010772 | Bourland | Apr 1991 | A |
5245734 | Issartel | Sep 1993 | A |
5283408 | Chen | Feb 1994 | A |
5293161 | MacDonald et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5365140 | Ohya et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5434549 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5510584 | Norris | Apr 1996 | A |
5510783 | Findlater et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5587875 | Sellers | Dec 1996 | A |
5590020 | Sellers | Dec 1996 | A |
5602715 | Lempicki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619005 | Shibukawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621610 | Moore et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625532 | Sellers | Apr 1997 | A |
5629578 | Winzer et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635928 | Takagi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5718418 | Gugsch | Feb 1998 | A |
5739759 | Nakazawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742242 | Sellers | Apr 1998 | A |
5783765 | Muramatsu | Jul 1998 | A |
5793605 | Sellers | Aug 1998 | A |
5812116 | Malhi | Sep 1998 | A |
5813142 | Demon | Sep 1998 | A |
5818149 | Safari et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5896076 | Van Namen | Apr 1999 | A |
5907199 | Miller | May 1999 | A |
5951908 | Cui et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959613 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982304 | Selker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982612 | Roylance | Nov 1999 | A |
5995026 | Sellers | Nov 1999 | A |
5999084 | Armstrong | Dec 1999 | A |
6127756 | Iwaki | Oct 2000 | A |
6135886 | Armstrong | Oct 2000 | A |
6218966 | Goodwin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222525 | Armstrong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6252336 | Hall | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6342880 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6351205 | Armstrong | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373465 | Jolly et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6408187 | Merriam | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411276 | Braun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6429849 | An | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438393 | Suuronen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444928 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455973 | Ineson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465921 | Horng | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6552404 | Hynes | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552471 | Chandran et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557072 | Osborn | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6642857 | Schediwy | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6693626 | Rosenberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717573 | Shahoian et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6809462 | Pelrine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809727 | Piot et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6864877 | Braun et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6906697 | Rosenberg | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906700 | Armstrong | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906703 | Vablais et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6952203 | Banerjee et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954657 | Bork et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963762 | Kaaresoja et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995752 | Lu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022927 | Hsu | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023112 | Miyamoto et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7081701 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121147 | Okada | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123948 | Nielsen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130664 | Williams | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136045 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161580 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162928 | Shank et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170498 | Huang | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176906 | Williams et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182691 | Schena | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194645 | Bieswanger et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217891 | Fischer et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218310 | Tierling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219561 | Okada | May 2007 | B2 |
7253350 | Noro et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7333604 | Zernovizky et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7334350 | Ellis | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7348968 | Dawson | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7388741 | Konuma et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392066 | Haparnas | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7423631 | Shahoian et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7446752 | Goldenberg et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469595 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495358 | Kobayashi | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508382 | Denoue et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7561142 | Shahoian et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562468 | Ellis | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7569086 | Chandran | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7639232 | Grant et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641618 | Noda et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7675414 | Ray | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7679611 | Schena | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7707742 | Ellis | May 2010 | B2 |
7710399 | Bruneau et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7732951 | Mukaide | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742036 | Grant et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7793429 | Ellis | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793430 | Ellis | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798982 | Zets et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7888892 | McReynolds et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893922 | Klinghult et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7919945 | Houston et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929382 | Yamazaki | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946483 | Miller et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952261 | Lipton et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7952566 | Poupyrev et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956770 | Klinghult et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961909 | Mandella et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8031172 | Kruse et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044940 | Narusawa | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069881 | Cunha | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8077145 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081156 | Ruettiger | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082640 | Takeda | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098234 | Lacroix et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8123660 | Kruse et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8125453 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8141276 | Ellis | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174372 | da Costa | May 2012 | B2 |
8179202 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8188623 | Park | May 2012 | B2 |
8205356 | Ellis | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8232494 | Purcocks | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8248277 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8248278 | Schlosser et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253686 | Kyung et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261468 | Ellis | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264465 | Grant et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8270114 | Argumedo et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8288899 | Park et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291614 | Ellis | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294600 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315746 | Cox et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8344834 | Niiyama | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378797 | Pance et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378798 | Bells et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378965 | Gregorio et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390594 | Modarres et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395587 | Cauwels et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398570 | Mortimer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8446264 | Tanase | May 2013 | B2 |
8451255 | Weber et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8461951 | Gassmann et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466889 | Tong et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8471690 | Hennig et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8487759 | Hill | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8542134 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547341 | Takashima et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8552859 | Pakula et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570291 | Motomura et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8575794 | Lee et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587955 | DiFonzo et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596755 | Hibi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8598893 | Camus | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599047 | Schlosser et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599152 | Wurtenberger et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8614431 | Huppi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621348 | Ramsay et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8633916 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8674941 | Casparian et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680723 | Subramanian | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681092 | Harada et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686952 | Pope et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8710966 | Hill | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8723813 | Park et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8735755 | Peterson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8760273 | Casparian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8787006 | Golko et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798534 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8836502 | Culbert et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8845071 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8857248 | Shih et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8860562 | Hill | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8866600 | Yang et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8928621 | Ciesla et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8970534 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976141 | Myers et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9008730 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9012795 | Niu | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9013426 | Cole et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9019088 | Zawacki et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9092129 | Abdo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9098991 | Park et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9131039 | Behles | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134834 | Reshef | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9158379 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178509 | Bernstein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201458 | Hunt et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9202355 | Hill | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9235267 | Pope et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9274601 | Faubert et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300181 | Maeda et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9317116 | Ullrich et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9325230 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9357052 | Ullrich | May 2016 | B2 |
9477342 | Daverman et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501912 | Havskjold et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
20030210259 | Liu | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021663 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040127198 | Roskind et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050057528 | Kleen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107129 | Kaewell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110778 | Ben Ayed | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118922 | Endo | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050217142 | Ellis | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237306 | Klein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050248549 | Dietz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258715 | Schlabach | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060154674 | Landschaft et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209037 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239746 | Grant | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252463 | Liao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070099574 | Wang | May 2007 | A1 |
20070152974 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178942 | Sadler et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188450 | Hernandez et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080084384 | Gregorio et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111431 | Dorel | May 2008 | A1 |
20080158149 | Levin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165148 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181501 | Faraboschi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181706 | Jackson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192014 | Kent et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204428 | Pierce et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080255794 | Levine | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090115734 | Fredriksson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128503 | Grant et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135142 | Fu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090167702 | Nurmi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090167704 | Terlizzi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090218148 | Hugeback et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090225046 | Kim et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236210 | Clark et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090267892 | Faubert | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267920 | Faubert et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090305744 | Ullrich | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313542 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020036 | Hui et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033030 | Amemiya | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053087 | Dai et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089735 | Takeda et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100141606 | Bae et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152620 | Ramsay et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164894 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188422 | Shingai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194547 | Terrell et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231508 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231550 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265197 | Purdy | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100309141 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328229 | Weber et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110053577 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107958 | Pance et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121765 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128239 | Polyakov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148608 | Grant et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163985 | Bae et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193802 | Park | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193824 | Modarres et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110248948 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110260988 | Colgate et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110291950 | Tong | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304559 | Pasquero | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120068957 | Puskarich et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075198 | Sulem et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092263 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120127088 | Pance et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139844 | Ramstein et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120256848 | Madabusi Srinivasan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120268412 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120274578 | Snow et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280927 | Ludwig | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120327006 | Israr et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130063285 | Elias | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063356 | Martisauskas | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130106699 | Babatunde | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120290 | Yumiki et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124076 | Bruni et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130191741 | Dickinson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200732 | Jun | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228023 | Drasnin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261811 | Yagi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300590 | Dietz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140035397 | Endo et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140082490 | Jung et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140232534 | Birnbaum et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247227 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267076 | Birnbaum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267952 | Sirois | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150005039 | Liu et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150061848 | Hill | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150090572 | Lee et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150109215 | Puskarich | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150227204 | Gipson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150296480 | Kinsey et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150324049 | Kies et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349619 | Degner et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160049265 | Bernstein | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063826 | Morrell et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160071384 | Hill | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160163165 | Morrell et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160195929 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160196935 | Bernstein | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211736 | Moussette et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216764 | Morrell et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216766 | Puskarich | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160231815 | Moussette et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160233012 | Lubinski et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241119 | Keeler | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259480 | Augenbergs et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160306423 | Uttermann et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160371942 | Smith, IV et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170038905 | Bijamov et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015100710 | Jul 2015 | AU |
2355434 | Feb 2002 | CA |
101409164 | Apr 2009 | CN |
102713805 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103416043 | Nov 2013 | CN |
104220963 | Dec 2014 | CN |
19517630 | Nov 1996 | DE |
10330024 | Jan 2005 | DE |
102009038103 | Feb 2011 | DE |
102011115762 | Apr 2013 | DE |
0483955 | May 1992 | EP |
1047258 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1686776 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2060967 | May 2009 | EP |
2073099 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2194444 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2264562 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2315186 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2374430 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2395414 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2461228 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2631746 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2434555 | Oct 2013 | EP |
H05301342 | Nov 1993 | JP |
2002199689 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002102799 | Sep 2002 | JP |
200362525 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004236202 | Aug 2004 | JP |
20050033909 | Apr 2005 | KR |
1020100046602 | May 2010 | KR |
1020110101516 | Sep 2011 | KR |
20130024420 | Mar 2013 | KR |
200518000 | Nov 2007 | TW |
201218039 | May 2012 | TW |
WO 9716932 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 0159588 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02073587 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03038800 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2006057770 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007114631 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008075082 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009038862 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009068986 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009097866 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009122331 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009150287 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010085575 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010087925 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2011007263 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2012052635 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012129247 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2013069148 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013169299 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014018086 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2015023670 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nasser et al., “Preliminary Evaluation of a Shape-Memory Alloy Tactile Feedback Display,” Advances in Robotics, Mechantronics, and Haptic Interfaces, ASME, DSC-vol. 49, pp. 73-80, 1993. |
Hill et al., “Real-time Estimation of Human Impedance for Haptic Interfaces,” Stanford Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Standford University, 6 pages, at least as early as Sep. 30, 2009. |
Kim et al., “Tactile Rendering of 3D Features on Touch Surfaces,” UIST '13, Oct. 8-11, 2013, St. Andrews, United Kingdom, 8 pages. |
Lee et al, “Haptic Pen: Tactile Feedback Stylus for Touch Screens,” Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, http://wwwlmerl.com, 6 pages, Oct. 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,669, filed Apr. 14, 2016, Uttermann et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/102,826, filed Jun. 8, 2016, Smith et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/251,459, filed Aug. 30, 2016, Miller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/260,047, filed Sep. 8, 2016, Degner. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/750,054, filed Mar. 30, 2010, Hill. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,455, filed Sep. 21, 2010, Puskarich et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,940, filed Nov. 19, 2010, Pance et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,867, filed Sep. 28, 2012, Bernstein. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/943,639, filed Jul. 16, 2013, Hill. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/059,693, filed Oct. 22, 2013, Puskarich. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,475, filed Jan. 27, 2014, Haysjold et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/493,190, filed Sep. 22, 2014, Hoen. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,927, filed Oct. 13, 2014, Hill. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,505, filed Jun. 2, 2015, Degner et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,582, filed Aug. 31, 2015, Morrell et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,465, filed Oct. 30, 2015, Bernstein. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,521, filed Nov. 16, 2015, Hill. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/910,108, filed Feb. 4, 2016, Martinez et al. |
Astronomer's Toolbox, “The Electromagnetic Spectrum,” http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/toolbox/emspectrum1.html, updated Mar. 2013, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/364,822, filed Nov. 30, 2016, Chen. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160172953 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62044881 | Sep 2014 | US | |
62007301 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14728505 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15046194 | US |