The present invention relates to a linear free piston Stirling machine. Such a machine may be an engine, for example, for use in a domestic combined heat and power system, or may be a cooler for a refrigerating system.
The displacer and power piston within the free piston machine are tuned as a mechanical spring-mass-damper resonators which reciprocate independently. A flexible rod, the lower end of which is fastened to a planar spring located in a lower dome of the machine, passes through the centre of the piston and is connected to the lower part of the displacer.
As the piston reciprocates in the Stirling engine, a magnet drum connected to this piston moves through coils of an alternator, so generating electricity.
Various approaches have been adopted in order to maintain the amplitude of reciprocation of the power piston within the physical limit of the design and avoid collisions at the end of each stroke. For example, two rows of secondary magnets have been incorporated on the magnet drum, in addition to the main field magnet as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,148,066. The secondary magnets produce a magnetic spring which keeps the amplitude of reciprocation within the required limits. However, the inclusion of the magnets reduces the efficiency of the system due to a reduction in the density of magnetic flux produced by the field magnets, caused by fringing fields extending above and below the spring magnets.
An alternative approach adopted in GB 2136087 is to use a spring attached to the reciprocating body. This has the disadvantage of increasing the mass which is to be reciprocated.
A further alternative is to use a gas spring as shown in DE 1 953 8422 and JP 4047150 to provide a cushioning effect. However, these reduce the efficiency of the engine as, in order to exert sufficient force to prevent collisions, the gas spring forces must start to act at a point where overstroke is not a risk. This unnecessary expenditure of energy will reduce the efficiency of the design.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an overstroke prevention mechanism which does not increase the mass to be reciprocated and which also does not cause parasitic power loss when the engine is reciprocated within normal limits.
According to the present invention, there is provided a linear free piston Stirling machine comprising a displacer and a power piston which are reciprocally mounted within a casing; an alternator electromagnetically coupled, in use, with the power piston; and an overstroke prevention mechanism which is fixed with respect to the casing and which comprises at least one resilient member, wherein the power piston comes into contact with the overstroke prevention mechanism when its displacement exceeds a predetermined level.
By providing an overstroke prevention mechanism in the form of a resilient member mounted to the casing, there is no increase in the reciprocating mass. Further, by positioning the mechanism so that the piston comes into contact with the mechanism when its displacement exceeds a predetermined level no power loss is caused during normal operation. The resilient member is able to have a significant effect over its short range of motion, it therefore does not need to begin to operate in the normal operation region as in the case of the gas spring.
In the broadest sense, the overstroke prevention mechanism can be used only to prevent overstroking in one direction as this may be sufficient in certain circumstances, or it is possible to use some different overstroke prevention mechanisms to prevent overstroking in the opposite direction. However, preferably, the power piston comes into contact with the overstroke prevention mechanism when its displacement exceeds a predetermined level in either direction of reciprocation of the power piston. Such an arrangement can prevent overstroking in either direction.
One way of implementing this is for the overstroke prevention mechanism to comprise a resilient member, wherein the power piston is provided with a first portion which is arranged to contact the resilient member if the displacement of the power piston exceeds the predetermined level in a first direction, and a second portion which is arranged to contact the resilient member if the displacement of the power piston exceeds the predetermined level in a second direction. Effectively, the single resilient member or a single group of resilient members prevent overstroking in both directions. This may be achieved either by providing the first and second portions in a recess within the power piston, or alternatively, providing the first and second portions on a separate component which projects from the power piston.
Alternatively, the overstroke prevention mechanism may comprise a first resilient member which is arranged to contact the power piston if the displacement of the power piston exceeds the predetermined level in a first direction and a second resilient member which is arranged to contact the power piston if the displacement of the power piston exceeds the predetermined level in a second direction. This effectively provides different resilient members to prevent overstroking in the two directions. Such a mechanism is more complex than the mechanism referred to above for the single resilient member or group of resilient members. However, there may be circumstances under which this would be the preferred option.
Examples of Stirling machines in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The structure and operation of a linear free piston Stirling machine is well-known in the art and will not be described in detail here.
As is well-known, a displacer piston (not shown) is connected to a flexible rod 1 as shown in
The overstroke mechanism is a resilient member 10 which is shown in detail in
When the power piston 4 exceeds its normal travel in an upward direction, the lower flanges 15 of each tongue will come into contact with the resilient tongues 12 which will immediately apply a retarding force on the power piston. Similarly, if the power piston 4 exceeds its normal motion in the downward direction, the upward flanges 16 will contact the resilient tongues 12 and again apply a retarding force. Should the power piston 4 further exceed its normal travel, the bottom of the power piston will strike the further resilient tongues 17 providing a further increase in the retarding force.
An alternative arrangement is shown in
If the piston 4 exceeds its allowed displacement in either direction, the spring plug 21 will contact the ends of the groove 20 and will apply a retarding force.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0417610.3 | Aug 2004 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB05/03075 | 8/4/2005 | WO | 10/9/2007 |