This application is related to the following applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/097,355, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,146,028; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/970,944; now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,237,620; 13/970,964; 13/970,990; 12/803,805; and 12/806,118 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,772,336; each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the addition of color mixing optics and optical feedback to produce uniform color throughout the output light beam of a multi-color linear LED illumination device.
2. Description of Related Art
Multi-color linear LED illumination devices (also referred to herein as lights, luminaires or lamps) have been commercially available for many years. Typical applications for linear LED illumination devices include wall washing in which a chain of lights attempt to uniformly illuminate a large portion of a wall, and cove lighting in which a chain of lights typically illuminates a large portion of a ceiling Multi-color linear LED lights often comprise red, green, and blue LEDs, however, some products use some combination of red, green, blue, white, and amber LEDs.
A multi-color linear LED illumination device typically includes one or more high power LEDs, which are mounted on a substrate and covered by a hemispherical silicone dome in a conventional package. The light output from the LED package is typically lambertian, which means that the LED package emits light in all directions. In most cases, Total Internal Reflection (TIR) secondary optical elements are used to extract the light emitted from a conventional LED package and focus that light into a desired beam. In order to extract the maximum amount of light, the TIR optics must have a specific shape relative to the dome of the LED package. Other dimensions of the TIR optics determine the shape of the emitted light beam.
Some multi-color linear LED light products comprise individually packaged LEDs and individual TIR optics for each LED. In order for the light emitted from the different colored LED emitters to mix properly, the light beams from each individual color LED must overlap. However, because the LEDs are spaced centimeters apart, the beams will overlap and the colors will mix only in the far field, at some distance away from the linear light. At a very close range to the linear light, the beams will be separate and the different colors are clearly visible. Although such a product may exhibit good color mixing in the far field, it does not exhibit good color mixing in the near field.
Other multi-color linear LED light products use red, green, and blue LEDs packaged together with a single TIR optic attached to each RGB LED package. These RGB LED packages typically comprise an array of three or four LEDs, which are placed as close together as possible on a substrate and the entire array is covered by one hemispherical dome. In products that use one TIR optical element for each multi-color LED package, there is not necessarily a need for the beams from the different TIR optical elements to overlap for the colors to mix. Therefore, such products tend to have better near field color mixing than products that use individually packaged LEDs.
However, depending on the size of the primary and secondary optics, the far field color mixing may actually be worse in products that package multiple colors of LEDs together. Since the different colored LEDs are in physically different locations within the hemispherical silicone dome, the light radiated from the dome, and therefore, from the TIR optical element will not be perfectly mixed. Although larger domes and larger TIR optical elements may be used to provide better color mixing, there are practical limits to the size of these components, and consequently, to the near and far field color mixing provided by such an approach.
An alternative optical system, although not commonly used, for color mixing and beam shaping in multi-color LED linear lights uses reflectors. In some cases, the light from a plurality of multi-colored LED emitter packages are mixed by a diffusion element and shaped by a concave reflector that redirects the light beams down a wall. The diffusion element could be combined with an exit lens or could be a shell diffuser placed over the multi-color emitter packages, for instance. Alternatively, the system could use a shell diffuser and a diffused exit lens. Although such systems can achieve very good color mixing in both the near and the far field, there is a tradeoff between color mixing and optical efficiency. As the amount of diffusion increases, the color mixing improves, but the optical efficiency decreases as the diffuser absorbs and scatters more light.
As LEDs age, the light output at a given drive current changes. Over thousands of hours, the light output from any individual LED may decrease by approximately 10-25% or more. The amount of degradation varies with drive current, temperature, color, and random defect density. As such, the different colored LEDs in a multi-color LED light will age differently, which changes the color of the light produced by the illumination device over time. A high quality multi-color LED light that can maintain precise color points over time should have the means to measure the light output from each color component, and adjust the drive current to compensate for changes. Further, a multi-color linear light should have the means to measure the light produced by each set of colored LEDs independent from other sets to prevent part of the linear light from producing a different color than other parts.
Multi-color LED linear lights with TIR optics on each individual LED cannot achieve good color mixing in the near field. Multi-color LED linear lights that combine a multi-color LED package with a TIR optical element require a large TIR optical element to achieve good color mixing in the near and far fields. Multi-color LED linear lights that use conventional diffusers and reflectors to achieve good color mixing in both the near and the far field suffer optical losses. As such, there is a need for an improved optical system for multi-color LED linear lights that provides good color mixing in the near and far fields, is not excessively large and expensive, and has good optical efficiency. Further, there is a need for an optical feedback system to maintain precise color in such linear lights. The invention described herein provides a solution.
A linear multi-color LED illumination device that produces a light beam with uniform color throughout the output beam without the use of excessively large optics or optical losses is disclosed herein. In addition to improved color mixing, the illumination device includes a light detector and optical feedback for maintaining precise and uniform color over time and/or with changes in temperature. The illumination device described herein may also be referred to as a light, luminaire or lamp.
Various embodiments are disclosed herein for improving color mixing in a linear multi-color LED illumination device. These embodiments include, but are not limited to, a uniquely configured dome encapsulating a plurality of emission LEDs and a light detector within an emitter module, a unique arrangement of the light detector relative to the emission LEDs within the dome, a unique arrangement of a plurality of such emitter modules in a linear light form factor, and reflectors that are specially designed to improve color mixing between the plurality of emitter modules. The embodiments disclosed herein may be utilized together or separately, and a variety of features and variations can be implemented, as desired, to achieve optimum color mixing results. In addition, related systems and methods can be utilized with the embodiments disclosed herein to provide additional advantages or features. Although the various embodiments disclosed herein are described as being implemented in a linear light form factor, certain features of the disclosed embodiments may be utilized in illumination devices having other form factors to improve the color mixing in those devices.
According to one embodiment, an illumination device is disclosed herein as including a plurality of LED emitter modules, which are spaced apart from each other and arranged in a line. Each emitter module may include a plurality of emission LEDs whose output beams combine to provide a wide color gamut and a wide range of precise white color temperatures along the black body curve. For example, each emitter module may include four different colors of emission LEDs, such as red, green, blue, and white LEDs. In such an example, the red, green, and blue emission LEDs may provide saturated colors, while a combination of light from the RGB LEDs and a phosphor converted white LED provide a range of whites and pastel colors. However, the emitter modules described herein are not limited to any particular number and/or color of emission LEDs, and may generally include a plurality of emission LEDs, which include at least two different colors of LEDs. The plurality of LEDs may be arranged in a two-dimensional array (e.g., a square array), mounted on a substrate (e.g., a ceramic substrate), and encapsulated within a dome.
In some embodiments, the linear illumination device may comprise six emitter modules per foot, and each emitter module may be rotated approximately 120 degrees relative to the next adjacent emitter module. The rotation of subsequent emitters in the line improves color mixing between adjacent emitter modules to some degree. Although such an arrangement has been shown to provide sufficient lumen output, efficacy, and color mixing, one skilled in the art would understand how the inventive concepts described herein can be applied to other combinations of LED numbers/colors per emitter module, alternative numbers of LED emitter modules per foot, and other angular rotations between emitter modules without departing from the scope of the invention.
In general, an illumination device in accordance with the present invention may include at least a first emitter module, a second emitter module, and a third emitter module arranged in a line, wherein the second emitter module is spaced equally distant between the first and third emitter modules. To improve color mixing, the second emitter module may be rotated X degrees relative to the first emitter module, and the third emitter module may be rotated 2X degrees relative to the first emitter module. X may be substantially any rotational angle equal to 360 degrees divided by an integer N, where N is greater than or equal to 3.
In some embodiments, color mixing may be further improved by covering each emitter module with an optically transmissive dome, whose shallow or flattened shape allows a significant amount of light emitted by the LED array to escape out of the side of the emitter module. For example, a shallow dome may be formed with a radius in a plane of the LED array that is about 20-30% larger than the radius of the curvature of the shallow dome. Such a shape may enable approximately 40% of the light emitted by the LED array to exit the shallow dome at small angles (e.g., approximately 0 to 30 degrees) relative to the plane of the LED array.
In some embodiments, color mixing may be further improved by the inclusion of a specially designed reflector, which is suspended above the plurality of emitter modules. The reflector comprises a plurality of louvers, each of which may be centered upon and suspended a spaced distance above a different one of the emitter modules. These louvers comprise a substantially circular shape with sloping sidewalls, which are angled so that a top diameter of the louver is substantially larger than a bottom diameter of the louver. The louvers are configured to focus a majority of the light emitted by the emitter modules into an output beam by configuring the bottom diameter of the louvers to be substantially larger than the diameter of the emitter modules. In some cases, the sloping sidewalls of the louvers may include a plurality of planar facets, which randomize the direction of light rays reflected from the planar facets.
By suspending the louvers a spaced distance above the emitter modules, the louvers allow the portion of the light that emanates sideways from adjacent emitter modules to mix underneath the louvers before that light is redirected out of the illumination device through an exit lens. In some embodiments, the louvers may be suspended approximately 5 mm to approximately 10 mm above the emitter modules. Other distances may be appropriate depending on the particular design of the emitter modules and the louvers.
In some embodiments, an exit lens may be provided with a combination of differently textured surfaces and/or patterns on opposing sides of the lens to further promote color mixing. For example, an internal surface of the exit lens may comprise a flat roughened surface that diffuses the light passing through the exit lens. An external surface of the exit lens may comprise an array of micro-lenses, or lenslets, to further scatter the light rays and shape the output beam.
In some embodiments, each emitter module may also comprise a detector, which is configured to detect light emitted by the emission LEDs. The detector is mounted onto the substrate and encapsulated within the shallow dome, along with the emission LEDs, and may be an orange, red or yellow LED, in one embodiment. Regardless of color, the detector LED is preferably placed so as to receive the greatest amount of reflected light from the emission LED having the shortest wavelength. For example, the emission LEDs may include red, green, blue and white LEDs arranged in a square array, in one embodiment. In this embodiment, the detector LED is least sensitive to the shortest wavelength emitter LED, i.e., the blue LED. For this reason, the detector LED is positioned on the side of the array that is furthest from the blue LED, so as to receive the greatest amount of light reflected off the dome from the blue LED. In some cases, the dome may have a diffuse or textured surface, which increases the amount of light that is reflected off the surface of the dome back towards the detector LED.
In addition to the emitter modules, the illumination device described herein includes a plurality of driver circuits coupled to the plurality of LEDs for supplying drive currents thereto. During a compensation period, the plurality of driver circuits are configured to supply drive currents to the plurality of emission LEDs, one LED at a time, so that the detector LED can detect the light emitted by each individual LED. A receiver is coupled to the detector LED for monitoring the light emitted by each individual LED and detected by the detector LED during the compensation period. In some embodiments, the receiver may comprise a trans-impedance amplifier that detects the amount of light produced by each individual LED. Control logic is coupled to the receiver and the driver circuits for controlling the drive currents produced by the driver circuits based on the amount of light detected from each LED. In some embodiments, the control logic may use optical and/or temperature measurements obtained from the emission LEDs to adjust the color and/or intensity of the light produced by the illumination device over time and/or with changes in temperature.
Various other patents and patent applications assigned to the assignee, including U.S. Publication No. 2010/0327764, describe means for periodically turning all but one emission LED off during the compensation period, so that the light produced by each emission LED can be individually measured. Other patent applications assigned to the assignee, including U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/970,944; 13/970,964; and 13/970,990 describe means for measuring a temperature of the LEDs and adjusting the intensity of light emitted by the LEDs to compensate for changes in temperature. These commonly assigned patents and patent applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety. The invention described herein utilizes the assignee's earlier work and improves upon the optical measurements by placing the detector LED within the dome, and away from the shortest wavelength LED, to ensure the light for all emission LEDs is properly detected.
Any detector in a multi-color light source with optical feedback should be placed to minimize interference from external light sources. This invention places the detectors within the silicone dome to prevent interference from external sources and other emitter modules within the linear light. The detectors are preferably red, orange or yellow LEDs, but could comprise silicon diodes or any other type of light detector. However, red, orange or yellow detector LEDs are preferable over silicon diodes, since silicon diodes are sensitive to infrared as well as visible light, while LEDs are sensitive to only visible light.
In some embodiments, the illumination device may further include an emitter housing, a power supply housing coupled to the emitter housing and at least one mounting bracket for mounting the illumination device to a surface (e.g., a wall or ceiling) The emitter modules, the reflector and the driver circuits described above reside within the emitter housing. The exit lens is mounted above the reflector and attached to sidewalls of the emitter housing. In some embodiments, the power supply housing may be coupled to a bottom surface of the emitter housing and comprises an orifice through which a power cable may be routed and connected to a power converter housed within the power supply housing. In some embodiments, a special hinge mechanism may be coupled between the emitter housing and the at least one mounting bracket. As described in the commonly assigned co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/097,335, the hinge mechanism allows the emitter housing to rotate approximately 180 degrees relative to the mounting bracket around a rotational axis of the hinge mechanism. The co-pending application is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Turning now to the drawings,
In general, LED lamp 10 comprises emitter housing 11, power supply housing 12, and rotating hinges 13. As shown more clearly in
In linear lighting fixtures, such as LED lamp 10, one major design requirement is to have the power cable enter and exit through the axis of rotation. This requirement allows adjacent lighting fixtures to be independently adjusted, while maintaining a constant distance between connection points of adjacent lighting fixtures. However, this requirement complicates the design of the rotational hinges used in linear lighting, as it prevents the hinges from both rotating and passing power through the same central axis. LED lamp 10 solves this problem by moving the rotational components of the hinge off-axis, and joining the rotational components to the central axis with a swing arm to a rack and pinion gear assembly. An embodiment of such a solution is shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The rotating hinge 13 shown in
Unlike conventional lighting devices, the present invention provides both power and rotation through the same axis by positioning the rotational components of the hinge 13 (i.e., the hinge element 16 and end cap 17) away from the rotational axis of the hinge mechanism. This is achieved, in one embodiment, by positioning the position holding gear of the hinge element 16 so that it travels around the semi-circular inner surface of the end cap 17 in an arc, whose radius is a fixed distance (d) away from the rotational axis of the hinge 13.
According to one embodiment, LED drivers 35 may comprise step down DC to DC converters that provide substantially constant current to the emission LEDs 37. Emission LEDs 37, in this example, may comprise white, blue, green, and red LEDs, but could include substantially any other combination of colors. LED drivers 35 typically supply different currents (levels or duty cycles) to each emission LED 37 to produce the desired overall color output from LED lamp 10. In some embodiments, LED drivers 35 may measure the temperature of the emission LEDs 37 through mechanisms described, e.g., in pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/970,944; 13/970,964; 13/970,990; and may periodically turn off all LEDs but one to perform optical measurements during a compensation period. The optical and temperature measurements obtained from the emission LEDs 37 may then be used to adjust the color and/or intensity of the light produced by the linear LED lamp 10 over time and with changes in temperature.
Detector 38 may be any device, such as a silicon photodiode or an LED, that produces current indicative of incident light. In at least one embodiment, however, detector 38 is preferably an LED with a peak emission wavelength in the range of approximately 550 nm to 700 nm. A detector 38 with such a peak emission wavelength will not produce photocurrent in response to infrared light, which reduces interference from ambient light. In at least one preferred embodiment, detector 38 may comprise a small red, orange or yellow LED.
Referring back to
The dome 71 may comprise substantially any optically transmissive material, such as silicone or the like, and may be formed through an overmolding process, for example. In some embodiments, a surface of the dome 71 may be lightly textured to increase light scattering and promote color mixing, as well as to reflect a small amount (e.g., about 5%) of the emitted light back toward the detector 38 mounted on the substrate 70. The size of the dome 71 (i.e., the diameter of the dome in the plane of the LEDs) is generally dependent on the size of the LED array. However, it is generally desired that the diameter of the dome be substantially larger (e.g., about 1.5 to 4 times larger) than the diameter of the LED array to prevent occurrences of total internal reflection. As described in more detail below, the size and shape (or curvature) of the dome 71 is specifically designed to enhance color mixing between the plurality of emitter modules 33.
In one example, the radius (rdome) of the shallow dome 71 in the plane of the LEDs may be approximately 4.8 mm and the radius (rcurve) of the dome curvature may be approximately 3.75 mm. The ratio of the two radii (4.8/3.75) is 1.28, which has been shown to provide the best balance between color mixing and efficiency for at least one particular combination and size of LEDs. However, one skilled in the art would understand how alternative radii and ratios may be used to achieve the same or similar color mixing results.
By configuring the dome 71 with a substantially flatter shape, the dome 71 shown in
For example, each emitter module may be rotated an additional X degrees from a preceding emitter module in the line. Generally speaking, X is a rotational angle equal to 360 degrees divided by an integer N, where N is greater than or equal to 3. The number N is dependent on the number of emitter modules included on the emitter board. For instance, with six emitter modules, each module could be rotated 60 or 120 degrees from the preceding emitter module. With eight emitter modules, each module could be rotated an additional 45 or 90 degrees. For best color mixing, the rotational angle X should be equal to 360 degrees divided by three or four depending on how many emitter modules are included on the emitter board 21.
The overall shape and size of the louvers 110-115 determine the shape, and to some extent the color, of the output beam. As shown in
As further depicted in
As further shown in
In addition the features described above (e.g., the flattened dome shape, the rotated emitter modules, the reflector with floating louvers, etc.), the exit lens 24 of the linear LED lamp 10 provides an additional measure of color mixing and beam shaping for the output beam. In general, the exit lens 24 is preferably configured with some combination of differently textured surfaces and/or patterns on opposing sides of the exit lens. The exit lens 24 preferably comprises injection modeled PMMA (acrylic), but could comprise substantially any other optically transparent material.
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that this invention is believed to provide color mixing optics and optical feedback to produce uniform color throughout the output light beam of a multi-color linear LED illumination device. More specifically, the invention provides an emitter module comprising a plurality of emission LEDs and a detector LED, all of which are mounted on a substrate and encapsulated in a shallow dome. The shallow dome allows a significant portion of the emitted light to emanate from the side of the emitter module, where it can mix with light from other emitter modules to improve color mixing. The invention further improves color mixing within a multi-color linear LED illumination device by rotating sets of the emitter modules relative to each other and providing a reflector comprising a plurality of floating louvers, which are centered upon and suspended above each of the emitter modules. The floating louvers allow a portion of the light emitted from each emitter module to mix with light from other emitter modules to produce uniform color throughout the resulting output beam. Further modifications and alternative embodiments of various aspects of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of this description. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such modifications and changes and, accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4029976 | Fish et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4402090 | Gfeller et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4713841 | Porter et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4745402 | Auerbach | May 1988 | A |
4809359 | Dockery | Feb 1989 | A |
5018057 | Biggs et al. | May 1991 | A |
5103466 | Bazes | Apr 1992 | A |
5181015 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5193201 | Tymes | Mar 1993 | A |
5218356 | Knapp | Jun 1993 | A |
5299046 | Spaeth et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317441 | Sidman | May 1994 | A |
5541759 | Neff et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5619262 | Uno | Apr 1997 | A |
5657145 | Smith | Aug 1997 | A |
5797085 | Beuk et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5905445 | Gurney et al. | May 1999 | A |
6016038 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6067595 | Lindenstruth | May 2000 | A |
6069929 | Yabe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084231 | Popat | Jul 2000 | A |
6094014 | Bucks et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094340 | Min | Jul 2000 | A |
6108114 | Gilliland et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6127783 | Pashley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147458 | Bucks et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150774 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6234645 | Borner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234648 | Borner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250774 | Begemann et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6333605 | Grouev et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344641 | Blalock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356774 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359712 | Kamitani | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384545 | Lau | May 2002 | B1 |
6396815 | Greaves et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414661 | Shen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441558 | Muthu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448550 | Nishimura | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6495964 | Muthu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498440 | Stam et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6513949 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6577512 | Tripathi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6617795 | Bruning | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636003 | Rahm et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639574 | Scheibe | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6664744 | Dietz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692136 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6741351 | Marshall et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6753661 | Muthu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6788011 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806659 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831569 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831626 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6853150 | Clauberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6879263 | Pederson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6965205 | Piepgras et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969954 | Lys | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975079 | Lys et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7006768 | Franklin | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7014336 | Ducharme et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7038399 | Lys et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046160 | Pederson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072587 | Dietz et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088031 | Brantner et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7119500 | Young | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135824 | Lys et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161311 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166966 | Naugler, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7194209 | Robbins et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7233115 | Lys | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233831 | Blackwell | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252408 | Mazzochette et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255458 | Ashdown | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7256554 | Lys | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262559 | Tripathi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294816 | Ng et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315139 | Selvan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7319298 | Jungwirth et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329998 | Jungwirth | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330002 | Joung | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330662 | Zimmerman | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352972 | Franklin | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358706 | Lys | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359640 | Onde et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362320 | Payne et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372859 | Hall et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7400310 | LeMay | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445340 | Conner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7511695 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7525611 | Zagar et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7554514 | Nozawa | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573210 | Ashdown et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583901 | Nakagawa et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7606451 | Morita | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607798 | Panotopoulos | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619193 | Deurenberg | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649527 | Cho et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7659672 | Yang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683864 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7701151 | Petrucci et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7737936 | Daly | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7828479 | Aslan et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8013538 | Zampini et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8018135 | Van De Ven et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8040299 | Kretz et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044899 | Ng et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044918 | Choi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057072 | Takenaka | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075182 | Dai et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8076869 | Shatford et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8159150 | Ashdown et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8174197 | Ghanem et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8174205 | Myers et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8283876 | Ji | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299722 | Melanson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8362707 | Draper et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8471496 | Knapp | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8521035 | Knapp et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8556438 | McKenzie et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569974 | Chobot | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595748 | Haggerty et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8633655 | Kao et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8653758 | Radermacher et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8680787 | Veskovic | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8704666 | Baker, Jr. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721115 | Ing | May 2014 | B2 |
8749172 | Knapp | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8773032 | May et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791647 | Kesterson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8816600 | Elder | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8911160 | Seo | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010020123 | Diab et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010030668 | Erten et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020014643 | Kubo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033981 | Keller et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020047624 | Stam et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049933 | Nyu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020134908 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138850 | Basil et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020171608 | Kanai et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030103413 | Jacobi, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030122749 | Booth, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133491 | Shih | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179721 | Shurmantine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040044709 | Cabrera et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052076 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052299 | Jay et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040101312 | Cabrera | May 2004 | A1 |
20040136682 | Watanabe | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040201793 | Anandan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220922 | Lovison et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040257311 | Kanai et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004727 | Remboski et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030203 | Sharp et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030267 | Tanghe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053378 | Stanchfield et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077838 | Blumel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110777 | Geaghan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050169643 | Franklin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050200292 | Naugler, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207157 | Tani | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242742 | Cheang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265731 | Keum et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060145887 | McMahon | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164291 | Gunnarsson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060198463 | Godin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220990 | Coushaine et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227085 | Boldt, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040512 | Jungwirth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070109239 | den Boer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132592 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139957 | Haim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070248180 | Bowman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254694 | Nakagwa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279346 | den Boer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080061717 | Bogner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080107029 | Hall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120559 | Yee | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136334 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136770 | Peker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136771 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150864 | Bergquist | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186898 | Petite | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222367 | Co | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235418 | Werthen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253766 | Yu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265799 | Sibert | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297070 | Kuenzler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080304833 | Zheng | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309255 | Myers et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080317475 | Pederson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090026978 | Robinson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040154 | Scheibe | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049295 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051496 | Pahlavan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090121238 | Peck | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171571 | Son et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196282 | Fellman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245101 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278789 | Declercq et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284511 | Takasugi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303972 | Flammer, III et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005533 | Shamir | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100054748 | Sato | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061734 | Knapp | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100096447 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100134021 | Ayres | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100134024 | Brandes | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141159 | Shiu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182294 | Roshan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188443 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188972 | Knapp | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194299 | Ye et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100213856 | Mizusako | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100272437 | Yoon et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100301777 | Kraemer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327764 | Knapp | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110031894 | Van De Ven | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044343 | Sethuram et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052214 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062874 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063214 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063268 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068699 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069094 | Knapp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069960 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110133654 | McKenzie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148315 | Van Der Veen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150028 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110248640 | Welten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253915 | Knapp | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110299854 | Jonsson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309754 | Ashdown et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120056545 | Radermacher et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120153839 | Farley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120229032 | Van De Ven et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120299481 | Stevens | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306370 | Van De Ven et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016978 | Son et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130088522 | Gettemy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130201690 | Vissenberg | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257314 | Alvord et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293147 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140028377 | Rosik et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150022110 | Sisto | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1291282 | Apr 2001 | CN |
1396616 | Feb 2003 | CN |
1573881 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1650673 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1849707 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101083866 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101150904 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101331798 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101458067 | Jun 2009 | CN |
0196347 | Oct 1986 | EP |
0456462 | Nov 1991 | EP |
2273851 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2307577 | May 1997 | GB |
06-302384 | Oct 1994 | JP |
08-201472 | Aug 1996 | JP |
11-025822 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2001-514432 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2004-325643 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-539247 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-260927 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-266974 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-267037 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008-507150 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-300152 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-134877 | Jun 2009 | JP |
0037904 | Jun 2000 | WO |
03075617 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2005024898 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2007069149 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008065607 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008129453 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2010124315 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2012005771 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012042429 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2013142437 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,990 mailed Aug. 20, 2015. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2015/037660 mailed Aug. 21, 2015. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,322 mailed Sep. 2, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,944 mailed Sep. 11, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/604,886 mailed Sep. 25, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/604,881 mailed Oct. 9, 2015. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2014 for JP Application 2012-523605. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2014 for JP Application 2012-523605. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 25, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/305,472. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,355. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/305,456. |
Notice of Allowance mailed May 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,212. |
Office Action mailed May 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
Partial International Search Report mailed Mar. 27, 2015 for PCT/US2014/068556. |
Office Action mailed Apr. 22, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,114. |
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/231,077. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
“LED Fundamentals, How to Read a Datasheet (Part 2 of 2) Characteristic Curves, Dimensions and Packaging,” Aug. 19, 2011, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, 17 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/068556 mailed Jun. 22, 2015. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/803,805 mailed Jun. 23, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,964 mailed Jun. 29, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,243 mailed Jul. 28, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,283 mailed Jul. 29, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,266 mailed Jul. 31, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,143. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/803,805. |
“Color Management of a Red, Green, and Blue LED Combinational Light Source,” Avago Technologies, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-8. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 28, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
Office Action mailed Mar. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,322. |
Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2015 for CN Application 201080035731.X. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2014 for JP Application 2012-520587. |
Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2015 for JP Application 2012-520587. |
Hall et al., “Jet Engine Control Using Ethernet with a BRAIN (Postprint),” AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, Jul. 2008, pp. 1-18. |
Kebemou, “A Partitioning-Centric Approach for the Modeling and the Methodical Design of Automotive Embedded System Architectures,” Dissertation of Technical University of Berlin, 2008, 176 pages. |
O'Brien et al., “Visible Light Communications and Other Developments in Optical Wireless,” Wireless World Research Forum, 2006, 26 pages. |
Zalewski et al., “Safety Issues in Avionics and Automotive Databuses,” IFAC World Congress, Jul. 2005, 6 pages. |
“Visible Light Communication: Tutorial,” Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), Mar. 2008. |
Johnson, “Visible Light Communications,” CTC Tech Brief, Nov. 2009, 2 pages. |
Chonko, “Use Forward Voltage Drop to Measure Junction Temperature,” Dec. 2005, (c) 2013 Penton Media, Inc., 5 pages. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/000219, mailed Oct. 12, 2010. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/002171, mailed Nov. 24, 2010. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/004953, mailed Mar. 22, 2010. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/001919, mailed Feb. 24, 2011. |
Office Action mailed May 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,467. |
Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,467. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,467. |
Office Action Mailed Feb. 1, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,143. |
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,143. |
Office Action Mailed Aug. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,114. |
Office Action Mailed Oct. 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
Office Action Mailed Jul. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,121. |
Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 11, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,121. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,118. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,126. |
Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,113. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 15, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,113. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion mailed Sep. 19, 2012 for PCT/US2012/045392. |
Partial International Search Report mailed Nov. 16, 2012 for PCT/US2012/052774. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/052774 mailed Feb. 4, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,113. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 25, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,121. |
Notice of Allowance mailed May 3, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,126. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/027157, May 16, 2013. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/924,628. |
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/178,686. |
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,118. |
Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 31, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/924,628. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/231,077. |
Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/803,805. |
Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2013 for CN Application No. 201080032373.7. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/178,686. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,118. |
Bouchet et al., “Visible-light communication system enabling 73 Mb/s data streaming,” IEEE Globecom Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications, 2010, pp. 1042-1046. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/U52015/037660 mailed Oct. 28, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/573,207 mailed Nov. 4, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/510,243 mailed Nov. 6, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/806,117 mailed Nov. 18, 2015. |
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2015/045252 mailed Nov. 18, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150159818 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |