Linear transducer arrangement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6672797
  • Patent Number
    6,672,797
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 27, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2004
    21 years ago
Abstract
A transducer arrangement and method that generates control signals indicating relative positions of the ends of a hydraulically movable tool of a machine. The generated control signals of the present invention are used by a conventional control circuit of the machine to control the ends of the hydraulically movable tool having elevation receivers as an desired mode of operation or when reception by one of the elevational receivers of a elevational reference, which provides an absolute position of the ends of the tool, is interrupted. The conventional control circuit of the machine uses the generated signal of the transducer arrangement of the present invention to maintain a relative elevation position of one side of the tool to the absolute position of the other side of the tool as desired or until both receiver can reacquire the elevational reference.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a linear transducer arrangement for control of a tool carried by a machine, and more specifically, to a control system of a hydraulically moveable tool carried by a machine having laser receivers receiving actual elevational positions of the ends of the tool from an external laser transmitter and a pair of linear transducer arrangement providing relative elevational positions of the ends of the tool to each other.




In concrete paving operations, after concrete is poured it is commonly finished by drawing a tool, such as a screed head, over the surface of the contour to finish the surface of the concrete before it cures. In asphalt paving operations, after asphalt is laid it is commonly leveled to a desired depth by drawing a tool, such as also a screed head of a paver, over the surface of the contour. Finally, in grading operations, a surface is graded to a desired depth by drawing a tool, such as a blade of a grader, over the surface of the contour. Thus, although the physical configurations of the types of screed heads and the grader's blade are not identical, the functions of these tools are analogous.




Typically, a hydraulic cylinder connected to each end of the tool of the machine, raise and lower the ends of the tool independently. It has been common to determine the elevational positions of the ends of the tool by using a laser transmitter or a sonic pulse as a reference in order to achieve the chosen surface level. As such, the raising and lowering of the tool is controlled by the control system and is in response to reception of the reference signal.




In the laser transmitter arrangement, a projected rotating beam of laser light defines a reference plane. A pair of laser receivers, one receiver mounted at each end of the tool on an associated mast for vertical movement with the tool, detect the reference plane and a control system of the machine then actuates hydraulic valves to supply fluid to the hydraulic cylinders in response to this detected level. As a result, the elevation of each end of the tool can be precisely controlled. In the sonic pulse arrangement, as disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 4,924,374 to Middleton, et al., a tool carried by a machine, can level a surface to a chosen depth by determining the time it takes for an acoustic pulse to travel from a transducer, such as an ultrasonic receiver, provided on a mast at each end of the tool to a reference surface and back. As a result, with this time value being used to calibrate a microprocessor-controlled distance-measuring device the elevation of each end of the tool can be precisely controlled. Accordingly, in both types of the above described arrangements, each of their respective type of receivers, either laser or sonic, provides elevational feedback to drive the hydraulics controlling the elevation of each side of the tool.




A problem may arise, however, if one the receivers is blocked by something of an appreciable height, such as, for example, a support column in a building, in the case of the laser receiver or interrupted in the case of the ultrasonic receiver. When a blockage or disruption occurs, there is a need to maintain the relative elevation of the ends of the tool until either the laser beam or sonic pulse can be reacquired by both receivers mounted at the ends of the tool. There is also a need to be able to pull the tool along a straight path, while maintaining the chosen thickness of the layer and matching forms or existing surfaces during a screeding, paving, or grading application.




One approach to this problem, in the laser arrangement is to set up two external laser transmitters at the same elevation on opposite sides of the tool. In this way, if a column blocks one of the transmitters, the other external transmitter is likely to be illuminating the receivers at the ends of the tool, thereby compensating for the blockage. Essentially, the prior art method is to eliminate all blind spots around the receivers. However, this prior art method adds an additional cost of a second external transmitter and time to properly set up the second external laser transmitter to eliminate the possibility of a column block.




Another approach to this problem is to use a gravity-based cross slope sensor, which detects the angular shifts of the tool as the tool tilts up and down. Additionally, the gravity-based cross slope sensor may be used as a reference for set up and control in a super flat, or plumb, floor application. Accordingly, when both sides of the tool are within the appropriate dead band, the desired grade of the cross slope sensor is measured and stored in memory of the tool's control system. When one laser receiver loses reception of the elevational reference, the cross slope sensor detects the height of the interrupted receiver side of the tool relative to its uninterrupted receiver side. That is, the cross slope sensor provides a relative measurement of the interrupted laser receiver which, when coupled with the absolute measurement of the uninterrupted laser receiver, provides an estimate of the absolute position of the interrupted laser receive. The control system of the tool can be used the provided absolute and estimated absolute positions to control the elevation of ends of the tool. However, several disadvantages exist in the cross slope sensor arrangement described above.




First, the gravity-based cross slope sensor is vulnerable to accelerations along its sensitive axis, resulting in miscalculations of the tool's slope. In screeding operations, it is quite common for the operator to “side shift” the tool around columns as he pulls the tool back. Since the sensitive axis of the gravity-based cross slope sensor is parallel to the length of the tool, this side shifting can cause noticeable acceleration along the sensitive axis of measurement, thus dramatically affecting the feedback of the cross slope sensor. Second, harmonics of the machine boom carrying the tool, which do not cause significant enough elevation shifts to be seen in the laser receivers at both ends of the tool, are detectable by gravity-base cross slope sensor since measuring acceleration and not machine movement. Third, in order to reduce the effects of noise and to compensate for some of the low frequency harmonics of the machine vibration, considerable low pass filtering of the cross slope sensor is required. The use of low pass filters on the output of the gravity-based cross slope sensor adds an inherent time lag to the system, which degrades the bandwidth performance of the blocked side. Finally, separate control gains for the cross slope sensor are used to compensate for the time lag, as well as, the change in loop gain, thus requiring frequent calibration adjustments in order to maintain performance of the control system.




Therefore, there is a need for providing a control system of a hydraulically moveable tool carried by a machine that does not require setting up a second external laser transmitter in order to maintain the elevation of the ends of the tool in a blocked or interrupted receiver situation.




There is also a need for providing a control system of a hydraulically moveable tool carried by a machine that does not require a gravity-based cross slope sensors to maintain the relative elevation of the ends of the tool in a blocked or interrupted situation until the reference signal(s) can be reacquired by both receivers.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




These needs are met by a linear transducer arrangement according to the present invention that provides a control signal for use by a conventional control circuit or system of a machine to maintain a selected elevational position between ends of a hydraulically moveable tool carried by the machine and a reference, when reception of the reference by one of a pair of elevation receivers at the ends of the tool is blocked or interrupted until the reference can be reacquired by both elevation receivers. Normally, absolute measurements are available on both side ends of the tool via a pair of mounted elevation receivers, such as laser or ultrasonic receivers. When reception of a reference, such as a laser beam from a laser transmitter or a sonic pulse from a transponder, by one of the of elevation receivers is interrupted, the control signal generated by the linear transducer arrangement of the present invention is used by the machine's control system to maintain the relative elevation of the side ends of the tool to each other until the reference can be reacquired by both elevation receivers. The present invention assist the control system in controlling the tool in a blocked or interrupted condition since that at any given time, at least one absolute measurement is available for an unblocked or uninterrupted side end of the tool and one relative elevational measurement from that unblocked or uninterrupted side end to the blocked or interrupted side of the tool is available to the control system of the machine. Accordingly, with the generated control signals from the transducer arrangement of the present invention the control system can maintain a relative elevation position of the interrupted receiver side to the absolute position of the uninterrupted receiver side until both receiver can reacquire the elevational reference.




In one aspect, the present invention is a linear transducer arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control circuit or system of a machine, having elevation receivers, in controlling movement of individual hydraulically moveable ends of a tool carried by a machine so as to maintain a selected elevational position between each end of the tool and a reference when reception one of the elevation receivers of the reference is interrupted, the laser transmitter comprising a first linear transducer mounted on a first end of the tool; and a second linear transducer mounted on a second end of the tool, the first and second linear transducers provide electrical outputs indicating the extension of elevation cylinders of the hydraulically moveable ends of the tool, thus providing to the control circuit the relative height of the interrupted elevation receiver to the uninterrupted elevation receiver until the disruption clears.




In another aspect, the present invention is a method of controlling the elevational position of hydraulically moveable ends of a tool of a machine in relationship to a reference detected by elevation receivers attached the ends of the tool, when reception of one of the elevation receivers of the reference is interrupted, comprising the steps of selecting a desired elevational position of the tool to the reference with the elevation receivers; generating outputs with a pair of linear transducers, each of the pair of linear transducers is associated with an elevation cylinder at each of the hydraulically moveable ends of the tool, and each of the outputs indicating the extension of the associated elevation cylinder; and using the output of the linear transducer associated with the hydraulically moveable end having the interrupted elevation receiver to maintain a constant relative height between the hydraulically moveable ends until the disruption clears.




Other objects, features and advantages will appear more fully in the course of the following discussion.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates a screeding operation of a typical concrete screed utilizing the control arrangement of the present invention;





FIG. 2

illustrates operation of an alternative control arrangement of the present invention;





FIG. 3

illustrates a grading operation of a typical grader utilizing the alternative control arrangement of the present invention; and





FIG. 4

illustrates a paving operation of a typical paver utilizing the alternative control arrangement of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION.




Referring to

FIG. 1

of the drawings, the device implementing the preferred embodiment of invention herein is a conventional control system


2


for a machine, such as a concrete screed


4


, that typically consist of an external laser transmitter


10


, transmitting a rotating laser beam


12


, in order to provide a reference, a pair of elevation receiver, such as laser receivers


14


, and a control box


16


for controlling electro-hydraulic control values (not shown) of the concrete screed


4


. The concrete screed


4


further includes a pair of masts


18


, each carrying one of the pair of laser receivers


14


, attached with and moved generally vertically, independently, with respective ends


20


and


21


oaf tool or screed head


22


. The screed head


22


is attached to the end of a hydraulic boom arm


23


which moves the screed head


22


in longitudinal direction Y. During normal operation, the control box


16


causes actuation of the hydraulic valves such that hydraulic cylinders


24


and


25


at the ends


20


and


21


, respectively, independently raise or lower, indicated by vertical directions Z


T


and Z


T


′, the ends


20


and


21


of the screed head


22


, as needed, as it is drawn in the direction of x over the surface of uncured concrete


26


. It is to be appreciated that the raising and lowering of the screed head


22


in the vertical directions Z and Z′ is accomplished in response to reception of the reference laser beam


12


by the pair of laser receivers


14


. The laser beam


12


rotates about an axis, as indicated at


28


, so as to define the reference as a reference plane of laser light.




As discussed above, a difficulty arises with the conventional control system


2


of this type when the path of the laser beam


12


to one of the pair of elevation receivers


14


is temporarily blocked by a column or other obstruction at a work site. In the present invention, an additional linear transducer arrangement, indicated generally by


30


, is mounted on each side of the tool or screed head


22


on the respective masts


18


to over come the above mention difficulty with the conventional control system


2


of the screed.




The linear transducer arrangement


30


, indicated by the dashed box, includes a pair of linear transducers


32


and


34


. Each of the pair of linear transducers


32


and


34


provides an electrical output indicating the extension of the associated hydraulic cylinder


24


and


25


upon which it is mounted. It is to be appreciated that any variety of linear transducers


32


and


34


, such as string encoders, sonic transducers, laser transducers, linear variable differential transformer (LVD


1


), and the like, will work in the linear transducer arrangement


30


of the present invention for measuring the extension of hydraulic cylinder


24


and


25


.




The transducer arrangement


30


, in a similar manner as the pair of elevation receivers


14


, is electrical coupled to the control system


16


via electrical lines


38


, which also provides power thereto. Thus, after an initial calibration, the transducer arrangement


30


, via the electrical lines


40


, provides to the control system


16


output signals, which indicates the relative height between the pair of masts


18


. It is to be appreciated that the control system


16


accepts the output signals from the transducer arrangement


30


as a standard input. Accordingly, the control system


16


uses the output signals of the transducer arrangement


30


to determine and therefore control the relative height of the two ends


20


and


21


of the screed head


22


when one of the normally absolute measurements provided by the pair of elevation receivers


14


is unavailable due to a column block situation or a disruption that produces a temporarily erroneous signal. When one of the pair of elevation receivers or laser receivers


14


loses the laser beam


12


, the associated linear transducer


32


or


34


for the hydraulic cylinder


24


or


25


is used as the control input for that side of the tool or screed head


22


. Since the elevation of the laser receiver


14


at the opposite end of the tool or screed head


22


is known, and the relative extension of the two hydraulic cylinders


24


and


25


is known from the outputs of the linear transducers


32


and


34


, the elevation of the tool or screed head


22


at the end at which the laser receiver


14


is blocked can be determined. Thus, the control system


2


using the output of the linear transducer


32


or


34


associated with the end


20


or


21


having the interrupted elevation receiver


14


to maintain a constant relative height between the ends


20


and


21


until the disruption clears.




The transducer arrangement of the invention may also be used in combination with an alternative conventional control system that employs for elevational receivers ultrasonic distance measuring devices or followers, such as commercially available “Tracers” from Spectra Precision, Inc., Dayton, Ohio, to work a surface to a predetermined elevation. Commonly assigned U. S. Pat. No. 4,924,374 to Middleton, et al. teach such a control system employing followers, which is incorporated by reference herein.





FIG. 2

of the drawings illustrates the use of the present invention, in combination with a pair of followers


40


and


41


, to screed concrete that has been poured into a form


42


where the surface of the finished concrete


26


is to have a predetermined inclination I.

FIG. 2

also depicts the longitudinal movement of the screed head


22


in the direction Y. An additional linear transducer


43


, see

FIG. 1

, is provided to monitor both distant and speed of the screed head's


22


longitudinal movement, via extension/retraction of boom


23


, where the present longitudinal position of the screed head


22


in the Y direction is indicated by Y′. In this alternative embodiment of the control system for the concrete screed


4


, elevation cylinders or hydraulic cylinders


44


and


46


that raise and lower the screed head


22


are also depicted diagrammatically in FIG.


2


. Accordingly, with the depicted alternative control system the linear transducers


32


and


34


of the present invention can be employed in a concrete paving application by the control system to finish the concrete surface


26


, as discussed hereafter.




In the concrete paving application a desired elevational position of the tool or screed head


22


to a reference


48


, such as a surface or surveyor's string, can be maintained by the alternative control system using the output signal of the linear transducer


32


on end


20


of the tool or screen head


22


and a follower


40


on end


21


. The control system maintains the pull at a proper elevation for a desired concrete pad thickness T by initially benching the screed head


22


all the way in or at first position Y


1


. A reading for Z


1


and Y


1


are taken, which represent the required elevation and distance for end


20


at a proximal end


50


of the form


42


at the completion of a pull. Next the boom arm


23


is extended out to a surface or form and benched in an extended position or second position Y


2


. A reading for Z


2


and Y


2


is then taken at this point, representing the required elevation and distance for end


20


at a distal end


52


of the form


42


at the start of the pull. Additionally, at the second position Y


2


the follower


40


is benched to the reference


48


by measuring the sonic pulse distant Z


T


. A relationship between these points is represented by the following equation:








Z




R


=((


Z




1




−Z




2


)/


Y


)(


Y


′)  (1)






where Z


R


a solved for relative reference line,




Y=Y


2


−Y


1


, which is the total length of a screed head pull, and




Y′=the current position of the screed head during the pull.




Accordingly, the control system using equation (


1


) can calculate the adjustment necessary for the side without the elevation receiver relative to the absolute position of the side with the receiver. Accordingly, during a pull of the screed head over the form


42


from Y


2


to Y


1


, the relative reference line Z


R


is maintained by using the output signal of the linear transducer


32


and the reference signal generated by the available follower


40


tracking the reference


48


with sonic pulses in order to match the form


42


.




It is to be appreciated that the transducer arrangement of the present invention could also be used in combination with conventional control systems of other types of machines. As depicted in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, the conventional control systems of a grader


54


and a paver


56


, operate essentially in the same manner as on the alternative control system of the concrete screed


4


, with certain differences to be described below. References made to the concrete screed


4


, in the alternative embodiment of

FIG. 2

, may be taken as references also to the grader


52


and paver


56


, with the differences in the paver embodiment being discussed below, after a complete discussion relating to the embodiments utilizing the grader


54


.




Referring to

FIG. 3

of the drawings, the control system implementing the invention herein includes the pair of followers


40


and


41


, which are mounted on frames


62


and


63


carried by the earth grader


54


. The frames


62


and


63


are mounted on a mold board or blade


64


, which is itself carried by the grader


54


. The frames


62


and


63


and the blade


64


are vertically adjustable by means of hydraulic rams or elevation cylinders


44


and


46


. In an alternative embodiment, the blade may be mounted on the frame, and the frame in turn carried by the grader. As mentioned above, each elevation cylinder


44


and


46


governs the height of one side of the blade


64


, and the elevation cylinders


44


and


46


are in turn governed by a hydraulic valve system


70


. The valve system


70


is controlled by the pair of followers


40


and


41


, in the manner taught by commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,924,374 to Middleton, et al, thus no further discussion is provided. With each elevation cylinder


44


and


46


attached, in a similar fashion as depicted in

FIG. 2

, is the linear transducer


32


and


34


, respectively, in accordance with the present invention. Each transducer


32


and


34


in the same manner as each one of the pair of followers


40


and


41


is connected, via electrical lines


76


, to a control system


80


. The control system


80


is mounted in a cab


90


of the grader


54


for viewing and operation by an operator of the grader. The structure and operation of the invention will hereinafter be described relative to one of the followers


40


and frame


62


maintaining a first reference surface


160


, but apply equally to the other follower


41


and frame


63


maintaining a second reference surface


170


.




It is to be appreciated that each of the followers


40


and


41


emits acoustic chirps, i.e. a series of acoustic pulses, which travels to either the first reference surface


160


and the second reference surface


170


, respectively, and are reflected back to their respective followers


40


and


41


. The control system


80


counts the total time of travel for a single chirp from each follower


40


and


41


to echo back by stopping a counter for each follower


40


and


41


, which was started when the chirp was emitted. The microprocessor (not shown) of the control system


80


uses the time values to control the side levels of the blade


64


and to “lock-on” to the desired depth. Thereafter, as the operator drives the grader


54


, the followers


40


and


41


continue to emit acoustic chirps, thus detecting any changes in the level of the first reference surface


160


. If, for instance, the level of the first reference surface


170


rises, the follower


40


detects the returned sonic pulse in a shorter time period, and this shorten time period indicated to the control system


80


that it needs to raise the blade


64


on that side, such that a constant distance is maintained between follower


40


and the reference surface


160


, thus ensuring that the blade


64


remains at a constant depth or offset relative to the surface


160


. Accordingly, should one of the followers


40


and


41


become interrupted causing a temporarily erroneous signal the control system


80


of the earth grader


54


can use the output signal from the linear transducer


32


or


34


on the interrupted side to maintain a desired depth of that side of the blade


64


relative to the reference ground surface


160


or


170


in a similar fashion as described previously above with regards to control system embodiments of the concrete screed


4


.




The transducer arrangement of the invention may also be used on a paver


56


, as depicted in

FIG. 4

, wherein the follower


40


and paver control box


85


are mounted on the paver


180


in essentially the same manner as on the concrete screed


4


and grader


54


, with certain differences to be described below. The paver


56


includes a paver blade or screed


280


, which pushes before it, as the operator of the paver drives along, a quantity of paving material


290


, which may be sand, asphalt or the like. The paving material


290


is leveled by the blade


280


into the desired surface configuration. The basic operation of the paver


56


is analogous to that of the grader


30


, in that the blade


280


is raised and lowered to compensate for the level of the reference surface


160


. The arrangement of the blade


280


of the paver


56


is, of course, somewhat different than that of the blade


40


of the grader


30


. Thus, the blade


280


is connected at the forward end of the paver


56


to the hydraulic rams or elevation cylinders


44


and


46


via draw bars


285


, one of which appears in FIG.


4


and the other of which would be located symmetrically opposite the draw bar


285


on the other side of the paver. With each elevation cylinder


44


and


46


, attached in a similar fashion as depicted in

FIG. 2

, is the linear transducer


32


and


34


, one of which appears in FIG.


4


and the other also of which would be located symmetrically opposite the shown transducer


32


on the other side of the paver. Each transducer


32


and


34


in the same manner as each one of the pair of followers


40


and


41


is connected, via electrical lines


76


, to the control system


85


.




As the forward ends of the draw bars


285


are raised, the change in the height of the leading edge of the blade


280


, which would be beneath the paver


56


, causes the blade level to travel upwards, due in part to a change in the angle of attack of the blade


280


relative to the paving material


290


. Conversely, as the draw bars are lowered, the leading edge of the blade


280


lowers, and digs into the paving material


290


somewhat, resulting in a lower pavement surface


300


relative to the first reference surface


160


. Thus, although the physical configurations of the screed head


22


, the grader blade


40


and the paver blade


280


are not identical, the functions of these blades are analogous. Accordingly, should one of the followers


40


and


41


become interrupted causing a temporarily erroneous signal, the control system


85


of the paver


56


can use the output signal from the linear transducer


32


or


34


on the interrupted side to maintain a desired depth of that side of the blade


280


relative to the reference ground surface


160


or lower pavement surface


300


in a similar fashion as described previously above with regards to control system embodiments of the concrete screed


4


.




The linear transducer arrangement


30


of the present invention provides a number of advantages over conventional control systems in which the slope across the tool is measured with a gravity based slope sensor to compensate of the loss of reception of the reference by one of the pair of elevation receivers. Unlike those types of control systems that incorporates a gravity-based sensor, the linear transducer arrangement of the present invention is unaffected by accelerations experienced by the tool (screed head


22


, grader blade


64


, or paver blade


280


). In normal screeding, paving, or grating operations, the tool


22


,


64


,


280


of the machine


4


,


54


,


56


, receptively, often rotates or shifts laterally. This movement applies an acceleration along the sensitive centerline axis of a slope sensor that is oriented to measure the angle of the tool's cross slope. Accordingly, the linear transducer arrangement of the present invention are completely immune to such acceleration. Additionally, since the linear transducers measure true movement and not just acceleration, they are not as vulnerable to possible machine vibration as would be the case with gravity-based cross slope sensors. Essentially, the linear transducer arrangement is no more sensitive to machine vibration than the pair of elevation receivers


14


or


40


and


41


. As a consequence, extensive low pass filtering of the output signal from each of the linear transducers


32


and


34


at low frequencies is not needed. Hence, the linear transducers


32


and


34


induce no appreciable time lag in it output signal into any of the conventional control systems


16


,


80


or


85


and thus is not limited to being sampled at 10 Hz, as is the case with the pair of conventional laser receivers


14


. Furthermore, for example, a user display


92


of the control system


85


, easily communicates with the linear transducers


32


and


34


for modes of operation where adjusting the elevation of the side with the blocked or interrupted follower


40


or


41


is desired (i.e. an indicate mode).



Claims
  • 1. An arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control system of a machine in controlling movement of individual hydraulically moveable ends of a tool carried by the machine so as to maintain a selected elevational position between each end of the tool and a reference when reception of one of the elevation receivers of the reference is interrupted, comprising:a pair of elevation receivers mounted for movement with opposite ends of said tool carried by said machine to provide signals to the control system indicating the elevational position between each end of said tool and said reference, a first linear transducer mounted on a first end of the tool; and a second linear transducer mounted on a second end of the tool, the first and second linear transducers providing electrical outputs indicating the extension of elevation cylinders of the hydraulically moveable ends of the tool, thus providing to the control system the relative height of the interrupted elevation receiver to the uninterrupted elevation receiver until the disruption clears.
  • 2. An arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control system as provided in claim 1, wherein said machine is selected from the group consisting of a concrete screed, a paver, and a grader.
  • 3. An arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control system as provided in claim 1, wherein said reference is a rotating laser beam of a laser transmitter and said pair of elevation receivers are laser receivers.
  • 4. An arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control system as provided in claim 1, wherein said reference is an sonic pulse from a transponder and said pair of elevational receivers are ultrasonic receivers.
  • 5. An arrangement for generating control signals for use by a conventional control system as provided in claim 1, wherein said first and second linear transducers are selected from a group consisting of string encoders, sonic transducers, laser transducers, and linear variable differential transformer.
  • 6. A method of controlling the elevational position of hydraulically moveable ends of a tool of a machine in relationship to a reference detected by elevation receivers attached to the ends of the tool, when reception of one of the elevation receivers of the reference is interrupted, comprising the steps of:(a) selecting a desired elevational position of the tool to the reference with the elevation receivers; (b) generating outputs with a pair of linear transducers, each of said pair of linear transducers associated with an elevation cylinder at one of the hydraulically moveable ends of the tool, and each of said outputs indicating the extension of said associated elevation cylinder; and (c) using said output of said linear transducer associated with the hydraulically moveable end having the interrupted elevation receiver to maintain a constant relative height between the hydraulically moveable ends until the disruption clears.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/117,348, filed Jan. 27, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
3674094 Kuntz Jul 1972 A
3953145 Teach Apr 1976 A
4807131 Clegg Feb 1989 A
4924374 Middleton et al. May 1990 A
4925340 Heiser et al. May 1990 A
4930935 Quenzi et al. Jun 1990 A
5156487 Haid Oct 1992 A
5288167 Gaffard et al. Feb 1994 A
5401115 Musil et al. Mar 1995 A
5556226 Hohmann, Jr. Sep 1996 A
5987371 Bailey et al. Nov 1999 A
6082927 Dahlinger et al. Jul 2000 A
6129481 Tapio et al. Oct 2000 A
6227761 Kieranen et al. May 2001 B1
6530720 Green Mar 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 9401812 Jan 1994 SE
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/117348 Jan 1999 US