The present invention is directed generally to linear actuators, and more particularly to compensating magnetic flux generated by the current in the moving coil of voice coil actuators.
Voice coil actuators are electromagnetic devices which provide force proportional to current applied to a coil. U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,963, assigned to the assignee of the present application, is a example of such voice coil actuators, and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Different configurations of linear voice coil actuators can provide different shapes of the Force vs. Stroke curves. However, these shapes cannot be changed without increasing the power level in the moving coil. But even this measure achieves only limited results due to a given distribution of the primary magnetic field and the armature reaction.
In a servo system, it may be necessary to maintain constant force or constant speed within a certain stroke. U.S. Pat. No. 5,177,383, entitled “Voice coil motor,” discloses coils with shorted turns employed in an attempt to achieve such characteristics. Because the turns in those coils are shorted, however, current in those turns cannot be adjusted when the moving coil moves from one position to another.
In accordance with the present invention, one or more separate compensating coils are employed to alter the distribution of the magnetic flux density in the air gap to produce a constant force throughout as much stroke as possible. Current in the separate compensating coils can be adjusted with the stroke using separate power supplies and a position feedback.
These and other features of the present invention will be more readily appreciated upon consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Referring to
As can be seen in the closed-ended embodiment of the invention illustrated in
A voice coil actuator in accordance with the present invention can have a variety of shapes, including a rectangular configuration and a cylindrical configuration. A rectangular embodiment will be described in the following sections, as an example, it being understood that other shapes are contemplated within the spirit of the present invention. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, although not shown in the figures, brackets or other linkages can be used to connect the moving coil to the load of the actuator. These brackets or other linkages can extend through longitudinal slots formed in the field blank 22 of the actuator.
In the embodiment of
In the closed-ended embodiment of the present invention, compensating coils 10-B or 10-C can be positioned in one or both of the cavities 14 or 16, respectively, which have been formed between the permanent magnet 18 and the inside surfaces 20 of the field blank 22. Alternatively, a core compensating coil 10-A can be employed which is wound around the core. The core compensating coil 10-A can be constructed to extend substantially the entire length of the core 12.
The structure provided in
The open-ended embodiment of
Stationary compensating coils 10-A, 10-B and 10-C can be connected in series with the moving coil 24 in such a way that their magnetic fluxes work against magnetic flux created by current in the moving coil 24, thereby reducing armature reaction and resultant inductance, and leading to a faster response of the actuator. In this case, a new Force vs. Stroke curve would generally reflect the increased output force throughout the stroke.
However, if there is a need for a “tailored” force throughout most of the stroke, then the compensating coils should be connected to a separate power supply 26, as shown in
Comparison of the above curves of
The Force vs. Stroke characteristics with the two different types of compensating coils are presented in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6.
From
Depending upon a particular application, both types of the compensating coils 10-A and 10-B, 10-C can conceivably be utilized.
It should be noted that the utilization of such compensating coils increases the input power to the actuator. However, the increased dissipation occurs in the stationary coils attached to a relatively large heat sink, as opposed to a moving coil which does not have such a heat sink. Further, heat generated within a moving coil doesn't change.
The compensating coil arrangement has been described as applied to linear voice coil actuators as an example only. The same approach can be used on rotary voice coil actuators.
The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are intended as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intent in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described, or portions thereof, it being recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/817,925, filed Mar. 27, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,713,904, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/192,999, filed on Mar. 28, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3619673 | Helms | Nov 1971 | A |
3863082 | Gillott et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3867675 | Kitz et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4243838 | Coffey | Jan 1981 | A |
4322584 | Shimada et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4357490 | Dickey | Nov 1982 | A |
5177383 | Sim | Jan 1993 | A |
5521774 | Parks et al. | May 1996 | A |
5677963 | Morcos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5729617 | Gruber | Mar 1998 | A |
5777403 | Yuan | Jul 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1308349 | Feb 1973 | GB |
224363 | Aug 1997 | JP |
308325 | Nov 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040130222 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60192999 | Mar 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09817925 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10741133 | US |