This invention relates an active artificial magnetic conductor (AAMC) which includes a periodic array of unit cells which reflects electromagnetic waves incident on its surface with zero-degree phase shift.
It is often desirable to place antennas near and parallel to metallic surfaces. However these surfaces reflect electromagnetic waves out of phase with the incident wave, thus short circuiting the antennas. While naturally occurring materials reflect electromagnetic waves out of phase, artificial magnetic conductors (AMCs) are metasurfaces that reflect incident electromagnetic waves in phase. An Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC) is a type of metamaterial that emulates a magnetic conductor over a limited bandwidth. See, in this regard, Gregoire, D.; White, C.; Colburn, J.; “Wideband artificial magnetic conductors loaded with non-Foster negative inductors,” Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE, vol. 10, 1586-1589, 2011 (hereinafter Gregoire) and D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. Broas, N. Alexopolous, and E. Yablonovitch, “High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 47, pp. 2059-2074, November 1999 (hereinafter Sievenpiper).
An AMC ground plane enables conformal antennas with currents flowing parallel to the surface because parallel image currents in the AMC ground plane enhance their sources. In the prior art, AMCs have been realized with a laminated structure composed of a periodic grid of metallic patches distributed on a grounded dielectric layer. See, in this regard, the prior art documents mentioned above as well as: F. Costa, S. Genovesi, and A. Monorchio, “On the bandwidth of high-impedance frequency selective surfaces”, IEEE AWPL, vol. 8, pp. 1341-1344, 2009 (hereinafter Costa).
AMCs are typically composed of unit cells that are less than a half-wavelength in size and achieve their properties by resonance. But such AMCs have limited bandwidth. Their bandwidth is proportional to the substrate thickness and its permeability. See, in this regard, the prior art documents mentioned above as well as: D. J. Kern, D. H. Werner and M. H. Wilhelm, “Active negative impedance loaded EBG structures for the realization of ultra-wideband Artificial Magnetic Conductors,” Proc. IEEE Ant. Prop. Int. Symp., vol. 2, 2003, pp. 427-430 (hereinafter Kern). At VHF-UHF frequencies, the thickness and/or permeability necessary for reasonable AMC bandwidth is excessively large for antenna ground-plane applications.
A passive AMC typically comprises metallic patches disposed above a ground plane with via holes connecting the patches to the RF ground with a dielectric medium between the patches and the RF ground. Passive AMCs must be very thick to have the operational bandwidths comparable to those achievable with much thinner active AMCs (AAMCs).
AAMC technology is applicable to a number of antenna applications including:
(1) increasing antenna bandwidth (see in this regard: White, C. R.; May, J. W.; Colburn, J. S.; “A variable negative-inductance integrated circuit at UHF frequencies,” Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, IEEE, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 35-37, 2011 (hereinafter White) and S. E. Sussman-Fort and R. M. Rudish, “Non-Foster impedance matching of electrically-small antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 57, no. 8, August 2009 (hereinafter Sussman-Fort).
(2) reducing finite ground plane edge effects for antennas mounted on structures to improve their radiation pattern,
(3) reducing coupling between closely spaced (<1λ) antenna elements on structures to mitigate co-site interference,
(4) enabling the radiation of energy polarized parallel to and directed along structural metal surfaces, and
(5) increasing the bandwidth and efficiency of cavity-backed slot antennas while reducing cavity size.
This AAMC technology is particularly applicable for frequencies <1 GHz where the physical size of the traditional AMC become prohibitive for most practical applications.
Active circuits (e.g. negative inductors or NFCs) may be employed to increase the bandwidth of a AMC, thus constituting the AAMC. The AAMC is loaded with non-Foster circuit (NFC) negative inductors to increase it bandwidth by 10 times or more. When the AMC is loaded with the NFC, its negative inductance in parallel with the substrate inductance results in a much larger net inductance and hence, a much larger AMC bandwidth. An AAMC architecture is shown in
In one aspect the present invention provides an active artificial magnetic conductor comprising an array of unit cells, each unit cell comprising an impedance element that is connected to neighboring impedance elements with non-Foster negative inductors parallel to the E plane, and having RF isolating plates between rows of unit cells parallel to the H plane. These isolating plates eliminate the undesirable cross coupling between the non-Foster negative inductors. The impedance elements may be formed by metallic patches preferably arranged in the 2D array of such patches. The metallic patches may be called impedance elements dues to the fact that present an impedance to an incoming wave. They impedance is represented by the grid admittance Yg in Eqn. 3 below.
In another aspect the present invention provides a method of electrically stabilizing an active artificial magnetic conductor comprising an array of unit cells, each unit cell comprising an impedance element that is connected to neighboring impedance elements with non-Foster negative inductors parallel to the E plane of incident RF energy, the method comprising reducing E-plane coupling between the negative inductors of the active artificial magnetic conductor by inserting RF isolating plates between rows of unit cells parallel to the H plane of the incident RF energy, each RF isolating plate extending between a ground plane of the active artificial magnetic conductor and the impedance element of each unit cell in a row thereof.
1, 4a2, and 4a3 depict embodiments of a linearly-polarized AAMC with respective plan (
1 and 4b2 show a plan (or top) view and a side elevational perspective (or end perspective) view, respectively, of a prototype AAMC with isolating plates therein. Since this is a prototype, dielectric tape can be seen, particularly in
This invention comprises an AAMC having a plurality of unit cells 19, each unit cell 19 comprising a metallic patch 22 disposed spaced from a ground plane 24 by a substrate 28. See
But before discussing the use of such isolation plates 20 to stabilize the AAMC it might be useful to first discuss the theoretical underpinnings of AMCs and AAMCs in general and how NFCs 30 may be implemented.
AMCs and AAMCs
An AMC is characterized by its resonant frequency, ω0, which is where an incident wave is reflected with 0° phase shift, and by its ±90° bandwidth, which is defined as the frequency range where the reflected phase is within the range |φr|<90°. AMC response can be accurately modeled over a limited frequency range using an equivalent parallel LRC circuit with LAMC, CAMC, and RAMC as the circuits' inductance, capacitance and resistance respectively. See the papers by Gregoire, Costa, Kern, White identified above as well as U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077 issued Mar. 10, 2015 noted above. The circuit impedance is
The resonant frequency and approximate fractional bandwidth (see the paper by Sievenpiper identified above) in the limit ω0LAMC<<Z0 are
where Z0 is the incident wave impedance.
An AMC of the form shown in
where d is the dielectric thickness, and ε and μ are the substrate's permittivity and permeability respectively. Ysub is expressed in terms of a frequency-dependent inductance, Lsub=−j/(ωYsub) which is approximately a constant Lsub≅μd for thin substrates with √{square root over (εμ)}ωd<<1. The grid impedance of the impedance elements formed by the electrically conductive patches (which may be embodied, without implying a limitation, as metallic square shaped elements) is capacitive, Yg=jω Cg, and can be accurately estimated analytically. See, in this regard, the paper by Sievenpiper identified above as well as O. Luukkonen et al, “Simple and accurate analytical model of planar grids and high-impedance surfaces”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Prop., vol. 56, 1624, 2008. The electrically conductive patches may assume other geometric shapes than a square shape (
The loaded AMC reflection properties can be estimated by equating the LRC circuit parameters of Eqn. 1 to quantities in the transmission line model (see Eqns. 3 and 4). If the load is capacitive, then the equivalent LRC circuit parameters are
LAMC=Lsub, CAMC=Cg+Cload and RAMC=Rload. (Eqn. 5)
If the load is inductive as it is in the AAMC, then they are
An active AMC is created when the load inductance is negative, and LAMC increases according to (Eqn. 6). When Lload<0 and |Lload|>Lsub>0, then LAMC>Lsub, resulting in an increase in the AMC bandwidth, and a decrease in the resonant frequency according to (Eqn. 2). When Lload approaches −Lsub, then LAMC is maximized, the resonant frequency is minimized and the bandwidth is maximized. The bandwidth and resonant frequency are prevented from going to infinity and 0 respectively by loss and capacitance in the NFC and the AMC structure.
AAMCs and Non-Foster Circuits
The AAMC is loaded with non-Foster circuit (NFC) negative inductors (see the papers by Gregiore and White identified above). The NFC is the semiconductor element that enables realization of the AAMC with a relatively high bandwidth when compared with an AMC without NFCs. The words “non-Foster” in non-Foster circuit (NFC) allude to the fact that the NFC circumvents Foster's reactance theorem (see R. M. Foster., “A reactance theorem”, Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 259-267, 1924 (hereinafter Foster)) utilizing an active circuit (preferably formed by a small semiconductor circuit) to cause the NFC to synthesize either a capacitor having a negative value or an inductor having a negative value depending upon the type of NFC utilized. The NFCs used with the AAMC herein preferably synthesize an inductor having a negative value. Details of an NFC circuit design and fabrication are given in the paper by White noted above, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. A NFC synthesizing an inductor having a negative value can be represented by the equivalent circuit model shown in
Non-Foster Circuits and AAMC Instability
The NFCs noted above can become unstable when the bias voltage goes too high and when they have detrimental coupling with neighboring NFCs. Instability is manifested as circuit oscillation and emission of unwanted radiation. Coupling between neighboring NFCs in the E plane (i.e. between NFCs in neighboring rows in
The present invention addresses the second instability problem noted in the preceding paragraph (the instability caused due to detrimental coupling with neighboring NFCs 30) by introducing RF isolation plates 20 disposed parallel to the H plane of incident RF waves on the AAMC. These isolation plates 20 preferably span the substrate 28 of the AAMC between the rows of the metallic elements or patches 22 and a ground plane 24 of the AAMC. Each isolation plate 20, when viewed in a top down view such as that seen in
See
In the upper left hand corner of
Impedance load elements 30, preferably formed by negative inductance NFCs, couple neighboring patch elements 22 arranged in columns following the y axis of
See also
Openings (not shown) may be provided in substrate 28 to allow for electrical connections to be made to the DC connections or pads (see for example
The AAMC operates for incident RF waves polarized perpendicular to the isolation plates 20 as denoted by the arrow on
Optionally, as is depicted by
These graphs show stability when the AAMC includes the RF isolation plates 20 disclosed herein. Building the AAMC without the RF isolation plates 20 disclosed herein resulted in instability.
The substrate 28 shown in
The RF isolation plates 20 couple the patches 22 to the ground plane in some ways similar the single post (see the “via to ground”) shown in
The spacings of the posts 21 in the embodiment of
Also instead of making the RF isolation plate 20 from a solid wall of metallic material or from rows of posts 21, the RF isolation plate 20 may alternatively be formed from a screen or mesh of electrically conductive material if desired. But if a mesh or screen is used in lieu of a solid wall of material, the fill factor of the metal in the screen or mesh would preferably be greater than 50% to better achieve the desired isolation between the NFCs 30. To help connote that fact that the isolation plate 20 need not necessarily be formed solid metallic material, the term isolating wall is used in the appended claims.
Each patch 22 is coupled to the ground plane 24 preferably by the aforementioned RF isolation plates 20 (or posts 21). The patches 22 may also be coupled to ground by other means such as by installing the AAMC in a metallic cavity (when used with cavity-backed slot antenna for example) so that the edges of the metallic cavity also act to couple patches at the edges of the cavity to ground. The patches 22 and the ground plane 24 may be formed of copper and may each be of the same thickness.
Having now described the invention in accordance with the requirements of the patent statute, those skilled in this art will understand how to make changes and modifications to the present invention to meet their specific requirements or conditions. Such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as disclosed herein.
The foregoing Detailed Description of exemplary embodiments is presented for purposes of illustration and disclosure in accordance with the requirements of the patent statute. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form(s) described, but only to enable others skilled in the art to understand how the invention may be suited for a particular use or implementation. The possibility of modifications and variations will now be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. No limitation is intended by the description of exemplary embodiments which may have included tolerances, feature dimensions, specific operating conditions, engineering specifications, or the like, and which may vary between implementations or with changes to the state of the art, and no limitation should be implied therefrom. Applicant has made this disclosure with respect to the current state of the art, but also contemplates advancements and that adaptations in the future may take into consideration of those advancements, namely in accordance with the then current state of the art. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims as written and equivalents as applicable. Reference to a claim element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated. Moreover, no element, component, nor method or process step in this disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or step is explicitly recited in the Claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for . . . ” and no method or process step herein is to be construed under those provisions unless the step, or steps, are expressly recited using the phrase “comprising the step(s) of . . . ”.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/051,778, filed Sep. 17, 2014 and entitled “Linearly polarized active artificial magnetic conductor”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to (i) U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077 issued Mar. 10, 2015 and entitled “Wideband Tunable Impedance Surfaces” and also to (ii) U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,173 issued Mar. 24, 2015 and entitled “Differential Negative Impedance Converters and Inverters with Tunable Conversion Ratios”, the disclosures of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234960 | Spilsbury et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4904952 | Tanimoto et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5392002 | Delano | Feb 1995 | A |
5489878 | Gilbert | Feb 1996 | A |
6081167 | Kromat | Jun 2000 | A |
6121940 | Skahill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6411261 | Lilly | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6483480 | Sievenpiper et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509875 | Nair et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518930 | Itoh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538621 | Sievenpiper et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6768472 | Alexopoulos et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6952565 | Takeda et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7042419 | Werner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7245269 | Sievenpiper et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7586384 | Ranta | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619568 | Gillette | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7847633 | Kinget | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852174 | Cathelin et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880568 | Amin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7941022 | Schaffner et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8111111 | Bezooijen | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8263939 | Delaney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8358989 | Kakuya et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374561 | Yung et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8436785 | Lai et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8451189 | Fluhler | May 2013 | B1 |
8639203 | Robert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8957831 | Gregoire et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8959831 | Smith | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8976077 | Colburn et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988173 | Hitko et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020041205 | Oppelt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040227668 | Sievenpiper | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050184922 | Ida et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070182639 | Sievenpiper et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080094300 | Lee | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164955 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080242237 | Rofougaran et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284674 | Herz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025973 | Kazantsev et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100039111 | Luekeke et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039343 | Uno et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100149430 | Fulga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100225395 | Patterson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231470 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110018649 | David et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110115584 | Kiji | May 2011 | A1 |
20120256811 | Colburn | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130009720 | White et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009722 | White et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130200947 | Alexopoulos et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150244079 | White et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244080 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150263432 | White et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101853974 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102005648 | Apr 2011 | CN |
0295704 | Dec 1988 | EP |
2290745 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2288502 | Oct 1995 | GB |
2008278159 | Nov 2008 | JP |
200845482 | Nov 2008 | TW |
2006054246 | May 2006 | WO |
2009090244 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039, Gregoire et al., filed Jun. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,737, White et al., filed Jul. 18, 2014. |
Adonin et al., “Monolith Optoelectronic Integrated Circuit With Built-In Photo-Voltaic Supply for Control and Monitoring,” 1998 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 529-531, (1998). |
Bezooijen et al. “RF-MEMS Based Adaptive Antenna Matching Module,” IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 573-576, (2007). |
Brennan et al., “The CMOS Negative Impedance Converter,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1272-1275, (Oct. 1988). |
Chen, Y., “Wideband Varactorless LC VCO Using a Tunable Negative-Inductance Cell,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, I: Regular Papers, vol. 57, No. 10, pp. 2609-2617, (Oct. 1, 2010). |
Colburn et al., “Adaptive Artificial Impedance Surface Conformal Antennas,” Proceedings IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 1-4, (2009). |
Costa et al., “On the Bandwidth of High-Impedance Frequency Selective Surfaces,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 1341-1344, (2009). |
Fong et al., “Scalar and Tensor Holographic Artificial Impedance Surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 3212-3221, (Oct. 2010). |
Foster, R. M., “A Reactance Theorem,” Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 259-267, (1924). |
Gower, J., Optical Communications Systems, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, pp. 40-46, (1993). |
Gregoire et al., “A Coaxial TEM Cell for Direct Measurement of UHF Artificial Magnetic Conductors,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 251-259, (Apr. 2012). |
Gregoire et al., “Non-Foster Metamaterials,” Antenna Applications Symposium 2011, (Sep. 2011). |
Gregoire et al., “Wideband Artificial Magnetic Conductors Loaded With Non-Foster Negative Inductors,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, No. 26, pp. 1586-1589, (Dec. 26, 2011). |
Hrabar et al., “Towards Active Dispersionless ENZ Metamaterial for Cloaking Applications,” Metamaterials, vol. 4, No. 2-3, pp. 89-97, (Aug. 1, 2010). |
Kern et al., “Active Negative Impedance Loaded EBG Structures for the Realization of Ultra-Wideband Artificial Magnetic Conductors,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 427-430, (2003). |
Kern et al., “Design of Reconfigurable Electromagnetic Bandgap Surfaces as Artificial Magnetic Conducting Ground Planes and Absorbers,” 2006 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 197-200, (Jul. 9, 2006). |
Linvill, J. G., “Transistor Negative-Impedance Converters,” Proceedings of the I.R.E., vol. 41, pp. 725-729, (Jun. 1953). |
Luukkonen et al, “Simple and Accurate Analytical Model of Planar Grids and High-Impedance Surfaces Comprising Metal Strips or Patches,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation, vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 1624-1632, (Jun. 2008). |
Mechkov, C. S., “A Heuristic Approach to Teaching Negative Resistance Phenomenon,” Third International Conference—Computer Science '06, Istanbul, Turkey, 6 pages, (Oct. 12-15, 2006). |
Mirzaei et al., “A Wideband Metamaterial-Inspired Compact Antenna Using Embedded Non-Foster Matching,” 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), pp. 1950-1953, (Jul. 3, 2011). |
Pozar, David M., Microwave Engineering, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 89-90 and 629-631, (16 pages with table of contents), (1998). |
Ramirez-Angulo, J. and Holmes, M., “Simple Technique Using Local CMFB to Enhance Slew Rate and Bandwidth of One-Stage CMOS op-amps,” Electronics Letters, vol., 38, No. 23, pp. 1409-1411, (Nov. 7, 2002). |
Sandel, B., Chapter 23, Radio Frequency Amplifiers, A.S.T.C., pp. 912-946, (1960). |
Sievenpiper et al., “High-Impedance Electromagnetic Surfaces With a Forbidden Frequency Band,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 2059-2074, (Nov. 1999). |
Song, K.-S. and Rojas, R. G., “Non-Foster Impedance Matching of Electrically Small Antennas,” Proceedings IEEE Antennas Propagation International Symposium, (Jul. 2010). |
Staple et al., “The End of Spectrum Scarcity,” published by IEEE Spectrum, pp. 1-5, (Mar. 2004). |
Stearns, S., “Non-Foster Circuits and Stability Theory,” Proceedings IEEE Antennas and Propagation International Symposium, pp. 1942-1945, (2011). |
Sussman-Fort, S., “Gyrator-Based Biquad Filters and Negative Impedance Converters for Microwaves,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 86-101, (1998). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E. and Rudish, R. M., “Increasing Efficiency or Bandwidth of Electrically Small Transmit Antennas By Impedance Matching With Non-Foster Circuits,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium 2006, pp. 137 and pp. 1-22, (Mar. 26-29, 2006). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E., “Matching Network Design Using Non-Foster Impedances,”International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 1-8, (Mar. 2006). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E., Slideshow for “Matching Network Design Using Non-Foster Impedances,” EDO Corporation, (43 pages), (Printed from the Internet on Jun. 30, 2011). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E. and Rudish, R. M., “Non-Foster Impedance Matching for Transmit Applications,” IEEE Xplore, EDO Corporation and Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 53-56, (Mar. 6-8, 2006). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E. and Rudish, R. M., “Non-Foster Impedance Matching of Electrically Small Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 2230-2241, (Aug. 2009). |
White et al., “A Variable Negative-Inductance Integrated Circuit at UHF Frequencies,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 35-37, (Jan. 2012). |
White Paper by the Virginia Tech Antenna Group of Wireless @ Virgina Tech, “Non-Foster Reactance Matching for Antennas,” pp. 1-5, <http://wireless.vt.edu/research/Antennas_Propagation/Whitepapers/Whitepaper-Non-Foster_Reactance_Matching_for_Antennas.pdf>. |
White, C. R. and Rebeiz, G. M., “A Shallow Varact-Tuned Cavity-Backed-Slot Antenna With a 1.9:1 Tuning Range,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation, vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 633-639, (Mar. 2010). |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021449.5, PRC Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 with English translation. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021746.X, PRC Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2015 with brief English summary. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021746.X, PRC Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2014 with English summary. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280033448.2, PRC Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2014 with English translation. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280033448.2, PRC Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2015 with machine English translation. |
From European Patent Application No. 12767559.3, EPO Supplementary European Search Report with European Search Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2014. |
From European Patent Application No. 12768357.1, EPO Supplementary European Search Report with European Search Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
From European Patent Application No. 12806913.5, EPO Search Report with Search Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2015. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032638, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Oct. 29, 2012. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032638, Chapter II, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Jun. 27, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032648, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Dec. 14, 2012. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032648, Chapter I, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Oct. 8, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/045632, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Jan. 10, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/045632, Chapter II, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Jul. 10, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072233, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR &WO) dated Mar. 16, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,563 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,374,561), Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,563 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,374,561), Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,563 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,374,561), Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 23, 2012. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,479 (Now Published as US 2013/0009720), Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 4, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,479 (Now Published as US 2013/0009720), Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 24, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Final Rejection dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,173), Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 13, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,173), Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,173), Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 10, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396 (Now U. S. Publication No. 2013/0009722 A1), Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396 (Now U. S. Publication No. 2013/0009722 A1), Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396 (Now U. S. Publication No. 2013/0009722 A1), Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396 (Now U. S. Publication No. 2013/0009722 Al), Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (Unpublished, Non Publication Requested), Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,225 (filed Feb. 24, 2014; Now U.S. Publication No. 2015/0244080), Application and Office Actions. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,264 (filed Feb. 24, 2014; Now U.S. Publication No. 2015/0244079), Application and Office Actions. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,737 (filed Jul. 18, 2014; Unpublished, Non Publication Requested), Application and Office Actions. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,076 (filed Feb. 20, 2015; Now U.S. Publication No. 2015/0263432 A1), Application and Office Actions. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62051778 | Sep 2014 | US |