The invention relates generally to liners used to prevent the intrusion of dust, mud, water, and other forms of debris (collectively “debris”). More specifically, the invention is a liner apparatus (the “apparatus”) and a method of making (the “method”) the apparatus.
Vehicles and other operating environments such as industrial equipment and structural surfaces can use liner apparatuses for purposes of function as well as aesthetics.
By way of example, wheel liners in the front of the vehicle can be used to keep debris from entering the engine compartment while simultaneously dampening exterior sounds and projecting a desirable aesthetic appearance. Wheel liners in the rear of the vehicle and underbody liners can be used to keep debris outside of the deep body areas of the vehicle while dampening sounds and enhancing the appearance of the vehicle. In the context of a wheel liner in a vehicle, there are three conventional approaches that individually and collectively teach away from the novel and non-obvious wheel liner disclosed in this application.
Traditional Wheel Liner. A traditional wheel liner is typically comprised of plastic that is either injection molded or thermoformed. Such a wheel liner is typically attached to the wheel areas of the vehicles through commercially standard attachment configurations. Unfortunately, the traditional wheel liner can result in an unacceptably noisy experience for human beings in the interior of the vehicle. Such wheel liners can also be aesthetically unattractive, diminishing the styling and aesthetic qualities of the vehicle.
Non-Woven Over-Patch. One approach to addressing the problems a traditional wheel liner in the prior art is to add non-woven sound proofing patches on top of the surfaces of the wheel liner. While such an approach can effectively address the sound and aesthetic issues, the approach also results in extra weight as well as extra material costs as the wheel liner possess a double surface for much of the liner. Securely fastening the non-woven surface over substantially all of the thermoformed plastic wheel liner can complicate the manufacturing process and make it substantially more expensive as the conventional wheel liner can possess a largely irregular surface and the response of the underlying plastic frame to heat and other manufacturing processes may be distinctly different to the fiber or fabric inserts.
Non-Woven Structure. Another alternative approach to the tradeoffs involving wheel liners is to replace the plastic structure of the wheel liner in its entirely and instead create a stand-alone structure using the non-woven material instead of using patches of such material on top of such a structure. This approach involves a substantially higher materials and manufacturing cost. Moreover, such an approach raises the requirements of non-standard additional mounting points.
The inventive apparatus can be characterized as a non-obvious hybrid combination of all three of the prior art approaches outlined above. The combination is not obvious in light of the prior art for several reasons. The approach is counterintuitive with respect to the teachings of the prior art while enjoying synergistic results. For example, modularity is not a goal that the prior art is generally cognizant of in the context of wheel liners. Prior art manufacturing processes also teach away from the hybrid approach of the innovative apparatus. The prior art does not teach or suggest the process for making the apparatus.
The apparatus is described in greater detail below in the Summary of the Invention section.
The invention relates generally to liners used to prevent the intrusion of dust, mud, water, and other forms of debris (collectively “debris”). More specifically, the invention is a liner apparatus (the “apparatus”) and a method of making (the “method”) the apparatus.
The apparatus is relatively rigid frame that includes various openings that are covered by relatively less rigid inserts. The combination of elements can allow the apparatus to keep out debris while dampening noise.
The apparatus can be implemented using a fully enclosing frame as well as a partially enclosing frame. The frame can be comprised of plastic, such as a foam-like plastic with a porous structure that results from using a combination of a super critical fluid (“SCF”) and a melted plastic. One or more inserts used to make the apparatus can include a hinge area and a hinge.
The apparatus can be more fully understood upon reading the drawings that are discussed briefly below.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principles and modes of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in preferred embodiments. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than is specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope. No set of drawings can expressly illustrate all of the possible variations in the shapes, sizes, material composition, and manufacturing process of the apparatus.
The following drawings illustrate different examples and embodiments of the apparatus:
a is a block diagram illustrating an example of an apparatus interacting with an operating environment, with the apparatus being comprised of a frame and an insert.
b is a hierarchy diagram illustrating an example of the different categories and subcategories of operating environments that can benefit from use of the apparatus.
a is diagram illustrating an example of a front exploded view of a liner apparatus and its component frame and inserts.
b is diagram illustrating an example of a frame without any inserts.
c is a diagram illustrating an example of two inserts that are shaped to be used with the frame illustrated in
d is a perspective diagram illustrating an example of an exploded view of an apparatus comprised of three inserts and two frames, with one of the inserts including a hinge area and a hinge.
e is a perspective diagram corresponding with
a is a perspective view diagram illustrating an example of an apparatus for use with a front wheel.
b is a front view diagram illustrating an example of an apparatus for use with a front wheel.
c is a diagram illustrating an example of two assemblies that can be combined and used in the aggregate as a wheel liner apparatus.
d is a diagram illustrating an example of exploded views of the assemblies illustrated in
e is a diagram illustrating an example of the bonding between a boundary area on a frame and an overlap area on an insert.
a is a high-level flow chart diagram illustrating an example of a process for making the apparatus.
b is a detailed flow chart diagram illustrating an example of a process for making the apparatus.
c is a flow chart diagram illustrating an example of various subsets that can comprise the step of molding the frame around the insert (i.e. overmolding the frame).
The wheel liner apparatus can be better understood in reference to the Detailed Description section set forth below.
The invention relates generally to liners used to prevent the intrusion of dust, mud, water, and other forms of debris (collectively “debris”). More specifically, the invention is a liner apparatus (the “apparatus” or “liner”) and a method of making (the “method”) the apparatus.
All element numbers and their corresponding element names and descriptions/definitions are listed in Table 1.
I. OVERVIEW
a is a block diagram illustrating a liner apparatus 200 interacting with an operating environment 120. The apparatus 200 is comprised of a frame 300 and an insert3000. The apparatus 200 can be comprised of a wide variety of different frame 300 and insert3000 configurations. One or more frames 300 and one or more inserts3000 can be configured in a wide variety of different geometries, comprised of a wide variety of different materials, and manufactured using a wide variety of different processes.
As illustrated in
Liners 200 can be implemented in a geometry that fits their desired operating environment 120. So for example, a liner 200 in the context of an underbody 125 for an automobile 123 may be more flat than a wheel liner 200. A liner apparatus 200 for a front wheel of an automobile 123 will often be larger than a liner apparatus 200 for a rear wheel of an automobile 123.
A. Frames
The frames 300 of the apparatus 200 are at least relatively more rigid than the corresponding inserts3000. The frame 300 is intended to provide the necessary rigidity that allows the position of the apparatus 200 to be secured within the desirable operating environment 120. Frames 300 can include one or more attachment components 380 that are used to secured the apparatus 200 in the desired location within the desired operating environment 120. Frames 300 also serve to secure the position and shape of the inserts3000 in the apparatus 200.
A frame 300 is comprised of interconnected members 360 that create open spaces (openings 370) in which inserts3000 are located. In many of the processes that can be used to manufacture the apparatus 200, the frames 300 are molded over (i.e. overmolded) the insert3000.
a, 2b, 2d, 2e, 3a, 3b, 3c, and 3d illustrate examples of frames 300 comprised of members 360.
As illustrated in
The frame 310 can be comprised of a variety of different materials but often some type of plastic 310. A foam-like plastic 312 with a porous structure 314 can be a particular desirable material for making the frame 310. A foam-like plastic 312 can be created by combining a gas 322 such as Nitrogen gas (N2) 324, Carbon Dioxide gas (CO2) 326, or other similar gasses 322 with a melted plastic 332 to form a super critical fluid (SCF) 320 can be cooled to solidify as the frame 300. A small amount of Nitrogen gas 324 or Carbon Dioxide gas 326 (typically between about 0.001% and about 1% by mass) can be combined with melted plastic 310 to form the foam-like plastic 312. Processes for making the apparatus 2000 are illustrated in
A foam-like plastic 312 can be associated with a variety of enhanced attributes 340 with respect to plastic 310 which does not have a porous structure 314. Such attributes 340 can include a reduced mass 341, a reduced warp 342, a reduced cycle time 343, a reduced clamping requirement 344, and an improved sound insulation.
B. Inserts
The majority of the surface of the apparatus 200 can be comprised of one or more inserts3000. The purpose of the frame 300 is to secure the position and structural integrity of the inserts3000. The inserts3000 provide the primary functionality of blocking debris, dampening sound, and taking up the space/serving as a barrier. As discussed above and as illustrated in
Inserts3000 can be comprised of a woven material 422 (i.e. a woven insert 420) as well as a non-woven material 412 (i.e. a non-woven insert 412). Inserts3000 can be configured in a wide variety of different contours 430, such as shapes that are at least substantially flat (i.e. flat inserts 434) and inserts3000 that are at least substantially three-dimensional (i.e, 3-D inserts 432).
Inserts are illustrated in
The increased complexity in terms of part definitions can be particularly useful in the context of wheel liners 124 and underbody liners 125.
As collectively illustrated in
The frames 300 can be comprised of a porous structure 314 such as foam-like plastic 312. The foam-like plastic 312 can be created by the use of a supercritical fluid (SCF) 320 fluid injection feature. This subprocess creating a foam-like plastic frame 312 is illustrated in
II. Automobile Operating Environments
Although the apparatus 200 can be implemented in a wide variety of different operating environments, vehicles 122 such as automobiles 123 are anticipated to be the primary beneficiary of the apparatus 200.
A. Vehicle and Environmental Components
A wide variety of different wheel liner apparatuses 124 can be used in conjunction with a wide variety of different vehicles, such as automobiles 123. Certain design attributes of the apparatus 200 will be impacted by the wheel areas of the vehicle on which the apparatus 200 is to be used. In most operational contexts, the apparatuses 200 used in conjunction with the front wheels of the vehicle 122 will be different that the apparatuses 200 used in conjunction with the rear wheels of the automobile 123. The apparatus 200 illustrated in
The apparatus 200 can be implemented in a manner that is fully compatible with existing prior art wheel liners such that the apparatus 200 can be used to replace prior art wheel liners. Compatibility of the apparatus 200 is achieved by including a compatible mating geometry in the apparatus 200 to facilitate installment of the apparatus 200 within the automobile 123.
1. Automobile
The apparatus 200 can be installed in a wide variety of different automobiles 123. Examples of automobiles 123 that can benefit from use of the apparatus 200 include cars, trucks, SUVs, and any other type of automobile 123 that uses a prior art wheel liner apparatus. The apparatus 200 can be particularly desirable in a context where performance, weight, aesthetics, noise dampening, shape, modularity, and cost are each important. An area of the automobile 123 in which the apparatus 200 is attached is a wheel area.
2. Wheel Area
The apparatus 200 is applied within the wheel area of an automobile 123. The apparatus 200 can be securely but removeably fixed to the wheel area using an attachment component 380 or a configuration of multiple attachment components 380 (see
3. Connection Points
Connection points are connectors in the wheel area of the automobile 123 that are designed to mate with the attachment components 380 on the apparatus 200 to securely fix the apparatus 200 to the automobile 123. The apparatus 200 can be configured to be installed in virtually any prior configuration of connection points. In a preferred embodiment of the apparatus 200, conventional “industry standard” connection points are used to secure the position of the apparatus 200 with respect to the wheel area. Connection points are typically constructed of a material similar to the material of the attachment components 380, which will often be some form of plastic. The number of connection points and mating attachment components 380 will typically differ with respect to front wheel applications and rear wheel applications as well as between different types of vehicles. Such variations also exist in the prior art, and the apparatus 200 can be implemented in a manner that is fully compatible with prior art liners and wheel areas.
B. Apparatus and its Component Parts
The apparatus 200 can be implemented in a wide variety of alternative embodiments for use in a wide variety of different vehicle environments. In many instances, embodiments of the apparatus 200 will differ based on whether the apparatus 200 is used for the front wheel of the automobile 123 (for example, see
Although front and rear wheel apparatuses 200 can be configured differently with respect to shape, size, geometry, number of openings 370, number of attachment components 380, etc. to fit in their respective wheel areas, the various elements of the apparatus 200 can be defined and described generically with respect to both front and rear wheel applications.
As illustrated in
1. Frame
A frame 300 is the substantially rigid body that shapes the apparatus 200. In many instances, the frame 300 is comprised of a plastic, typically a thermoformed injection molded plastic. A frame 300 can be comprised of a wide variety of different materials or material combinations, but will in most instances be at least relatively more rigid that the material comprising the inserts 400. The frame 300 is a subassembly of various components serving different functions. As discussed above, it can be desirable to make the frame 300 from an SCF 320 that is made by adding some gas 322 to a melted plastic 322. After cooling, the resulting foam-like plastic 312 can be porous 314 and possess a variety of desirable enhanced attributes 340.
a. Member
A frame 300 is combination of one or more members 360. In
b. Opening
An opening 370 is a space within the frame 300 between the various members 360 of the frame 300. The opening 370 is the space within the frame that an insert 400 covers. A rear wheel embodiment of the apparatus 200 will typically have two openings 370 and two corresponding inserts 400 with alternative embodiments having a range between about 1 and 4 openings 400. A front wheel embodiment of the apparatus 200 will typically have four openings 370 and four corresponding inserts 400, with alternative embodiments having a range between about 1 and 8 openings 370.
c. Attachment Components
One of the functions of the frame 300 is to provide the apparatus 200 with the ability to be secured into a fixed position within the wheel area. An attachment component 380 is a component of the frame 300 that mates with a corresponding connection point on the wheel area of the automobile 123. Any prior art technology of securing a prior art wheel liner apparatus on an automobile 123 can be used as an attachment component 380 for the apparatus 200. A wide variety of different technologies can be incorporated into the apparatus 200 as attachment components 380. Attachment components 380 allow the apparatus 200 to be compatible with prior art wheel liners because the configuration of attachment components 380 of the apparatus 200 can correspond to similar mechanisms on prior art wheel liners.
d. Boundary Surface
The apparatus 200 is comprised of a frame 300 that is connected to one or more inserts 400. A boundary surface 390 is the area on the frame 300 that is directly mated with an overlap surface 470 on the insert 40. The bonding between the boundary surface 390 of the frame 300 and the overlap surface 470 of the insert 400 keeps the apparatus 200 as a unified whole when the apparatus 200 is installed and used on the automobile 123. The bonding between the boundary surface 48 of the frame 300 and the overlap surface 470 of the insert 400 is typically implemented through the overmolding process used to form the frame 300 around the insert 400. Alternatively, a wide variety of bonding agents can be used. In a preferred embodiment, the frame 300 is overmolded onto the insert 400. The bonding between the frame 300 and insert 400 can increase the performance of the apparatus 200.
2. Insert
c illustrates an example of inserts 400 that correspond to the frame 300 illustrated in
a. Insert Body
The main body 460 of the insert 400 is the portion of the insert 400 that does not overlap with the frame 300. The insert body 460 will typically comprise the vast majority of the insert 50.
b. Overlap Surface
The overlap surface 470 of the insert 400 is the portion of the insert 400 that overlaps with the boundary surface 390 of the frame 300. In many embodiments, the frame 300 is actually formed directly on the overlap surface 470 of the insert 400.
III. Advantages Over the Prior Art
The apparatus 200 can be configured and implemented in such a manner as to be perform the function of keeping out mud, water, dirt, snow, stones, water and other debris (collectively the “debris”) outside the engine compartment (in the case of front wheel liners) and deep body areas of the vehicle (in the case of rear wheel liners).
The apparatus 200 can also perform the secondary functions of dampening the noise perceived from within the occupant area of the automobile 123 and while conveying a desirable aesthetic appearance to observers positioned outside the automobile 123. Rather than seeing mechanical parts and different components of the automobile 123, such parts and components are tucked in the back of the apparatus 200 that ultimately provides a nice looking, continuous surface. The noise of the wheels running (i.e. turning) is amplified and transferred inside the automobile 123, therefore the ability of the apparatus 200 to improve the sound proofing of the inside of the vehicle is material function.
In addition to the considerations mentioned above, there is also an advantage to reducing weight for components. Use of the apparatus 200 as a replacement for prior art lines allows the apparatus 200 to replace heavier parts with lighter materials.
The apparatus 200 is an improved solution over the prior art. The apparatus 200 combines the advantages of prior previous designs while reducing/eliminating the negative aspects. The hybrid approach for the apparatus 200 is completely inter-changeable with the traditional, plastic-only design and therefore the number of attachment points on the vehicles is unchanged and kept to a minimum (compared with the non-woven only solution). The apparatus 200 provides opportunity for weight savings as most of the part surface is moved from hard plastic towards the non-woven material. The apparatus 200 can use rigid material such as hard plastic in key areas allows for the same overall part rigidity and consistency while allowing for the use of less rigid materials for the inserts 400. As the amount of rigid material is reduced and optimized, the overall cost of the apparatus 200 gets significantly lower than the non-woven only option.
The apparatus 200 represents an innovative solution pertaining to the interface between the non-woven inserts 400 and the hard plastic frame 300. This interface accommodates over-lapping of the two materials and a consequential thickness variation. The thickness variation allows for improved manufacturability of the assembly, compensating for tolerance spread of components as well as positioning variations. Another feature that can be incorporated into the apparatus 200 pertains to insert handling and positioning in the over-molding tool 500, allowing the frame 300 to be molded around the applicable insert 400. The innovative apparatus 200 can be created using a manufacturing process that includes retention features in the mold that allow for proper insert holding prior to the over-molding cycle.
By using a plastic frame 300 in conjunction with less rigid non-woven inserts 400 the aggregate result for the apparatus 200 is desirable tradeoff between the benefits structural strength and flexibility. The apparatus 200 can be characterized as a non-obvious combination of certain aspects found in existing prior art wheel liners. The apparatus 200 is contrasted with the plastic, plastic+patch, and non-woven liners below. The manufacturing process that can be used to create a preferred embodiment of the apparatus 200 and prior art teachings regarding conflicting tradeoffs that affirmatively teach away from the apparatus 200 render the apparatus both novel and non-obvious.
A. Apparatus vs. Traditional Plastic Wheel Liner
A traditional wheel liner is typically comprised of plastic (“plastic liner”) that is either injection molded or thermoformed. Such a wheel liner is typically attached to the wheel areas of the vehicles through commercially standard attachment configurations. Unfortunately, the traditional wheel liner can result in an unacceptably noisy experience for human beings in the interior of the vehicle. Such wheel liners can also be aesthetically unattractive, diminishing the styling and aesthetic qualities of the vehicle.
Unlike a traditional plastic liner, the apparatus 200 utilizes the plastic material for the frame 300, not the entire apparatus 200. The openings on the frame 300 are filled with the non-woven insert 50. The apparatus 200 can be aesthetically superior, 15-30% lighter, and 2-3 dB less noisy than a traditional plastic liner, while being only 300-60% as expensive.
B. Apparatus vs. Non-Woven Over-Patch
One alternative prior art approach is the use of non-woven patches on top of a traditional plastic liner (“plastic+patch liner”). The non-woven patches are added on to the traditional apparatus, making this alternative more expensive and heavier than a traditional plastic liner. While such an approach can effectively address the sound and aesthetic issues, the approach also results in extra weight as well as extra material costs as the wheel liner possess a double surface for much of the liner. Securely fastening the non-woven surface over substantially all of the thermoformed plastic wheel liner can complicate the manufacturing process and make it more expensive as the conventional wheel liner can possess a largely irregular surface and the response of the underlying plastic frame to heat and other manufacturing processes may be distinctly different to the fiber or fabric inserts.
In contrast, the apparatus 200 uses only a plastic frame 300 that includes substantial openings 370 covered by non-woven inserts 400. The apparatus 200 is thus aesthetically equivalent to a plastic+patch liner while having 15-30% less mass, a mere 1 dB decrease in sound dampening coupled with a 50% reduction in cost.
C. Apparatus v. Non-Woven Structure
Another alternative approach to the tradeoffs involving wheel liners is to replace the plastic structure of the wheel liner in its entirely and instead create a stand-alone structure using the non-woven material instead of using patches of such material on top of a plastic structure (“non-woven liner”). This approach involves a substantially higher materials and manufacturing cost. Moreover, such an approach raises the requirements of non-standard additional mounting points.
By utilizing a plastic frame 300, the apparatus 200 is 50% less expensive than a non-woven structure, while possessing the same sound dampening and aesthetic qualities. The apparatus 200 is somewhat heavier than an equivalent non-woven liner, but the hybrid design provides for complete interchangeability with plastic liners because installment of the non-woven liners requires a greater number of attachment components and connection points.
D. Additional Attributes of the Apparatus
Varying the geometry of the non-woven inserts 400 allows for greater flexibility in the manufacturing of the apparatus 200 because the frame 300 can be molded around the inserts 400 (i.e. the geometry of the inserts 400 can be specified while keeping in mind the tool position for the mold over plastic used to create the frame 300). This design in return allows for increased manufacturability of the apparatus 200 in regular production environment, eliminating the need for very precise, high tolerance inserts 400. In a preferred embodiment of the apparatus 200, there is overlap between the frame 300 and the insert 400. The overlapped areas (the overlap surface 470 of the insert 400 and the boundary surface 390 of the frame 300) allow for improved bonding between the two materials of the frame 300 and insert 400, increasing the overall performance of the resulted assembly.
While the attachment components 380 of the apparatus 200 are impacted by compatibility/interchangeability concerns, the shape and contour of the components of the apparatus 200 can be optimized in order to achieve maximum material yield for the non-woven insert 400. By building a multiple cavity tool for the forming process further cost reductions become possible.
The apparatus 200 can be manufactured in which an insert 400 is subjected to an over-molding process in which the frame 300 is formed. The tool used to manufacture the apparatus 200 can include retention features built in the core, allowing for precise positioning and retention of the inserts 400 prior to the tool closing.
One advantage of the apparatus 200 is the ability to develop multiple design alternatives using the same tooling. The design of the apparatus 200 is such that first apparatus 200 tool would do forming of the inserts 400 and then consequently take those and insert them into an injection molding tool, this allows for a large flexibility in terms of insert definition. Manufacturers could use various performance materials and generate different outcome by simply switching between raw material specs for the non-woven inserts 400. Manufacturers could also implement inserts 400 that have up to 300-60% vegetal/renewable fiber, again by simply using a different non-woven raw material.
The design of the apparatus 200 and the manufacturing process used to create the apparatus 200 addresses several design and manufacturing related issues and solves them: interface between non-woven inserts 400 and injection molded frame 300; the geometry of the non-woven inserts 400; and the positioning of inserts 400 in the over-molding tool use to create the frame 300, a process that enhances repeatability and quality.
It is anticipated that the innovative aspects of the apparatus 200 can also be applied to other vehicle components, including panels (such as side panels and door panels) and trunk garnish (spare wheel cover) can be switched towards a somewhat similar frame 300/insert 400 design.
Some embodiments of the apparatus 200 can include additional components. For example, some embodiments of the apparatus 200 can include a soft rubber-like edge to eliminate potential rattle noise.
IV. Front Wheel Embodiments
The apparatus 200 can be embodied using a variety of different materials, geometric shapes, and component configurations. In a typical automobile, the apparatus 200 used in the front of the automobile 123 will be different than the apparatus 200 used in the rear of the automobile 123. The distinction between front wheel and rear wheel configurations is a distinction that exists in the prior art, and thus must be mirrored by the apparatus 200 if the apparatus 200 is to be compatible and interchangeable with conventional prior art wheel liners.
a, 2b, and 2c disclose an example of an apparatus 200 suitable for use on the rear wheels of an automobile 123. The fact that the apparatus 200 is intended for use in a rear wheel location on the automobile 123 impacts the size and geometry of the apparatus 200 as well as the number and location of the attachment components 380. However, the different components of the frame 300 and inserts 400 found in a rear wheel embodiment of the apparatus 200 are also present in a front wheel embodiment of the apparatus 200.
a is a perspective view illustrating an example of a front wheel embodiment of the apparatus 200.
The overmolding of the frame 300 onto the inserts 400 is the conceptually the same for front wheel liners as it is for rear wheel liners. As illustrated in
V. Method of Making the Apparatus
The apparatus 200 represents a non-obvious improvement over the prior art in a variety of different respects. Some of the bases for non-obviousness can be found in the process for manufacturing the apparatus 200. In a preferred embodiment of the apparatus 200, the inserts 400 are created first, and then the frame 300 is subsequently molded over the inserts 50.
A. Tool
A needle holder 560 in a steel tool 500 can hold a needle 560 that secures the position of the non-woven insert 400 with respect to the tool 500. A threaded insert 580 and a die draw 570 can mold a plastic frame 300 around the insert 40. The process for overmolding the apparatus 200 is described below.
A. Example #1
a is high-level flowchart illustrating an example of a process for manufacturing the apparatus 200.
At 700, the inserts 400 are created. As discussed above, the inserts 400 are preferably comprised of a non-woven material.
At 800, the frame 300 is overmolded over and around the insert 400 created at 700.
In some embodiments, the apparatus 200 is an assembled collection of assemblies 210. In some embodiments, individual assemblies 210 are installed in the operating environment 120. In other embodiments, the assemblies 210 are combined into the apparatus 200 prior to installation in the operating environment 120
B. Example #2
b is a detailed flow chart diagram illustrating an example of a process for manufacturing the apparatus 200. There are two overarching categories of activities performed in the creation of the apparatus 200. Inserts 400 are formed at 700, and a frame 300 is then overmolded over the inserts 400 at 800.
At 710, a portion of the raw material used to form the insert 400 is cut from a roll. The material is cut to a predefined length that corresponds to the size of the insert 400.
At 720, the cut portion is heated. In order to achieve a permanent predefined for from a flexible non-woven roll the material must be heated close to the melting point of the non-woven fibers. Different materials will have different melting points, and thus different materials will involve different target temperatures.
At 730, the heated material is placed into a mold. The material is cooled down against a 3-D mold that shapes the material into the geometric form/contour of the desired insert 400.
At 740, the insert 400 is formed within the mold.
At 750, the formed sheet resulting from the 3-D mold (there could be several inserts 400 bundled in the same sheet and a multiple mode cavity) is removed from the mold and subjected to a secondary tool for trimming the formed sheets.
At 760, the inserts 400 are positioned on a predefined table, near the injection molding machine used to create the frame 300.
At 810, a pre-programmed end of arm tooling selects the inserts 400 from the table and prepares them for inserting into the mold tool 500. The end of the arm tool has grippers on retractable needles.
At 820, the end of arm tool gets inside the overmold tool 500 (illustrated in
At 830, the inserts 400 are positioned within the injection tool illustrated in
At 840, the tool 500 shuts closed and the plastic is molded around the inserts 400. As melted plastic reaches the non-woven inserts 400 the plastic forms the double layer area of plastic on top of the non-woven material (i.e. the boundary surface 370 of the frame 300 that overlays the overlap area 470 of the insert 400). As discussed above and illustrated in
Returning to
The process can be characterized as a complex one-shot injection that uses automated tools to place the inserts 400 in the overmolding tool 500. A complex one-shot injection approach shortens the cycle time while facilitating a more reliable working environment.
C. Example of Overmolding Process that uses SCF
c is a flow chart diagram illustrating an example of an overmolding process 840 that utilizes SCF 320.
At 842, the gas 322 is combined with melted plastic 310 to form the SCP 320.
At 844, the SCF 320 is injected into the applicable cavity or cavaties.
At 846, the fluid is allowed to cool, forming the foam-like plastic 312.
VI. Alternative Embodiments
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principles and modes of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in preferred embodiments. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than is specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope. For example, virtually any prior art variations in different mating configurations between attachment components 380 and connection points can be incorporated into the apparatus 200. Other prior art variations pertaining to geometric shape, material composition, etc. can also be incorporated into the hybrid approaches embodied in the various alternative embodiments of the apparatus 200.
Different processes 700, 800 can be utilized to manufacture the apparatus 200, and there are many different variations that can be implemented into the apparatus 200.
VII. Glossary/Index
Table 1 below discloses a list of element numbers and names.
This utility patent application is a continuation-in-part of the following patent applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety: (a) U.S. utility patent application titled “WHEEL LINER APPARATUS” (Ser. No. 13/705,165) filed on Dec. 4, 2012 (“First Application”); (b) PCT patent application titled “WHEEL LINER APPARATUS” (Application Number PCT/US13/73203) filed on Dec. 4, 2013 (“Second Application”); and (c) “WHEEL LINER APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME” (Ser. No. 14/720,971) filed on May 25, 2015 (“Third Application”). The Second Application claims priority to the First Application and the Third Application claims priority to the First Application.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14720971 | May 2015 | US |
Child | PCT/US2013/073203 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2013/073203 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14731405 | US |