The field of the invention is hanging and cementing liners and more particularly a setting tool latch that can release and re-latch to allow one trip functionality to perform a tack and squeeze job with a standard bottom up cement job and setting the liner hanger seal thereafter.
Liner hanging and cementing typically involves putting a liner and a liner hanger in position in a borehole with a running string. The anchor portion of the liner hanger is set either by applied pressure on a dropped ball or by expansion of a slip cage with a swage driven by a combination anchor and telescoping member that moves the swage. When the slips are set and the liner is supported from the surrounding tubular, the cement can be pumped though the liner to the lower end where there is a cement shoe. The cement goes through the cement shoe and into the annular space while displacing well fluid ahead of the cement. The well fluid is displaced by the cement through the open spaces between the set anchor in the liner hanger. After the cement is placed the anchor and stroker for the swage in the running tool is engaged to expand the seal in the liner hanger. Alternatively the seal of the liner hanger can be set with internal pressure on a piston assembly, usually done after another ball is landed on the seat inside the liner hanger or another method such as a flapper to create an internal pressure on piston assembly. After the liner hanger seal is set the lock for the running tool into the liner is released and the running tool is removed.
In some unconsolidated formation the traditional bottom up cementing through a shoe may create an unsatisfactory cement job as large voids may concentrate the cement in a single area as opposed to sealing the liner along it length as envisioned. In the past the next step would be to pull out the running tool and run in again with an assembly to set the seal after delivery of cement above the liner hanger and through the gaps in the anchor portion of the liner hanger. Thereafter the hanger seal would need to be set. The extra trip to do a tack and squeeze job was necessitated by the limitations of the existing equipment designed to release the running tool for the liner hanger only after the liner hanger seal was set. In order to do a tack and squeeze job with the known expandable liner hanger such as TORX® available from Baker Hughes Incorporated of Houston, Tex. USA the liner hanger would need to be retagged after release and raising above from an extension pipe associated with the liner hanger that is not expanded. This meant that the locking dogs would need to release to allow the running tool to be raised to do the tack and squeeze job and then the running tool dogs would need to enter an unexpanded portion of the extension pipe to re-latch a groove in the extension pipe so that the anchor and stroker can further advance a running tool swage to expand the hanger seal. This component with the locking dogs known as an RS packoff in the TORX® product family, was not designed to do anything but release one time after the packer seal was expanded. In trying to do a tack and squeeze job with the TORX® liner hanger the problem after the initial release of the RS tool would be that the dogs would stick on the taper between the expanded going into the unexpanded portions of the liner hanger extension pipe and the running tool would not be able to re-engage the liner hanger to allow use of the anchor and stroker to finish the expansion of the liner hanger seal.
The known RS packoff seal is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,132,619 with the dogs being 204 that are released from a groove 202 in the unexpanded portion of the liner as the mandrel is raised after the liner hanger anchor and packer are set. This design for the packoff seal was not amenable to release before the packer seal was set followed by a subsequent re-latching. As explained above the dogs would jam trying to re-enter a decreasing taper to re-extend into groove 202. This reference is fully incorporated herein as if actually set forth.
As a result the old design for the packoff 194 in U.S. Pat. No. 8,132,619 has been reconfigured to allow release after extending the liner hanger slips so that a tack and squeeze job can be undertaken without a trip out of the hole and then the packoff can reengage the groove in the unexpanded portion of the liner hanger extension tube so that the anchor and stroker of the running tool will be anchored to the liner as the liner hanger seal is expanded after the tack and squeeze job. In essence the present invention by providing the improved packoff latching assembly with new functionality of release and re-latching enables a method of running in a liner hanger and setting the anchor portion of the liner hanger followed by the option of doing a standard bottom up cement job and if that is not satisfactory doing a tack and squeeze job without having to pull out of the hole. In essence a standard cement job and a tack and squeeze job can be performed with a liner hanger in a single trip. In the preferred embodiment the liner hanger is set with swage expansion but the present invention contemplates other styles of liner hanger in a one trip dual cementing functionality method that still allows the liner hanger seal to be set after the final cementing operation. These and other aspects of the present invention will be more readily understood from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while appreciating that the full scope of the invention is to be determined from the appended claims.
A liner hanger is initially set to the surrounding tubular. A standard bottom up cement job through a shoe at the liner bottom can be performed. If that job does not test satisfactory then the running tool can be unlatched at the packoff and raised beyond the liner hanger extension tubular so that a tack and squeeze job can be accomplished pumping the cement top down through the gaps in the liner anchor. The running tool can be re-latched to the liner hanger extension tube that is still unexpanded. Once re-locked into a groove in the extension the running tool for the liner hanger can be operated to set the seal and release the running tool from the groove in the extension to pull out of the hole. The liner hanger anchor and seal can be expanded into the set position by the running tool.
The FIGS. discussed in detail below belong to a liner hanger assembly shown schematically as anchor slips 10 and seal 12. Their operation is the same as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,132,619 but the components that have been redesigned to provide the new functionality are the packoff 194 from that patent which is shown in various positions in detail in the FIGS. The new part is referred to by assignee Baker Hughes Incorporated is the RS packoff assembly 6. The initial expansion of the slips 10 is as described in the referenced patent using a running tool featuring an anchor and a stroker that has a swage 14 at its lower end movable relative to mandrel 1 that is secured for run in to nipple 3 through the packoff assembly 6 as shown in the
Several noteworthy features of the present invention need to be emphasized. First is that a liner hanger can permit a standard cement job as well as a tack and squeeze cement job in either order but preferably the standard cement job first without a trip out of the hole. This can be accomplished with any liner hanger whether it sets with expansion as in the preferred embodiment or whether it sets with pressure on dropped balls or some other way. The features of the packoff 6 that enable the two procedures to be done in a single trip followed by setting the seal 12 are that the dogs 2 get retained to the slick stinger 1 when unlocked and then in the process of re-latching the dogs 2 latch 4 is released to allow the stringer to further advance and lock in the dogs 2 and to enable the inner seal 22 as it travels past the flats shown in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below: