The present invention relates to closures or caps used to close containers. More particularly, this invention relates to an improved closure or cap for sealing a container aseptically filled with a liquid nutritional product, such as infant formula for example. Whether or not the container is equipped with a metal foil membrane seal hermetically covering the container opening, the present invention provides a linerless cap for sealing the container. Advantageously, the cap of this invention can be used to securely reseal a foil membrane sealed container after the membrane has been punctured. The need for a separate liner installed in the cap is eliminated.
Closures or caps are often utilized to close the mouth or opening of a container. It is sometimes desirable that these closures be capable of repeatedly sealing the container. Prior art closures have included the following features: a sealing member positioned inside the container opening, use of a separate foam liner, and an inflexible or permanently deformable sealing member. All of these features contain certain shortcomings.
Closures having a sealing member positioned inside the opening of a container are undesirable where a container has been initially closed with a membrane seal. The membrane-sealed container is usually shipped with a closure fastened over the membrane. In this case, a closure that seals the container through penetration within the opening of the container is impractical since it would interfere with or damage the membrane seal.
The rim about a container opening will typically have variations in its finish and/or height. When a metal foil membrane is attached in covering relation to the container rim additional variation can result. A separate foam liner installed in the cap is often required to overcome these problems. In this situation a liner is provided between the closure and the container where the closure is insufficient to effectively seal the container by itself. These liners are typically attached to the closure prior to the closure being fastened to the container. The use of a liner is undesirable since it requires increased manufacturing complexity and cost.
Further, an inflexible or permanently deformable sealing member will be unable to accommodate the uneven rim with repeated use. Closures having a sealing member that is inflexible or permanently deformable are unsatisfactory for accommodating manufacturing variations in containers. Closures that are inflexible or permanently deformable may be unable to tolerate finish variations, resulting in an imperfect or failed seal.
Therefore, a principal object of this invention is to provide a sealing closure capable of sealing a container without penetrating an opening in the container.
Another object of the invention is to provide a sealing closure that effectively eliminates the need for a liner to maintain a seal between a container and the sealing closure.
A further object of the invention is to provide a sealing closure capable of sealing a container while accommodating height, finish or other surface variations at the rim of the container.
These and other objects will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
A sealing closure for use with a container includes a top wall, an annular skirt, an annular flange, and at least one stop rib. The annular skirt extends downwardly from the top wall. The annular flange extends downwardly from the top wall and radially outwardly toward the annular skirt. The stop rib extends downwardly from the top wall extends radially inwardly between the annular skirt and the annular flange. The stop rib is adapted to abut the rim or a portion of a membrane covering the rim and thereby limits a distance of upward deflection of the annular flange, which contacts the rim or a membrane residing thereon to provide an effective surface area of sealing.
The sealing closure of this invention is generally shown in
An annular skirt 18 extends downwardly from the top wall 12. The annular skirt 18 has an outer surface 20 and an inner surface 22.
A container engaging element 24 is formed on the inner surface 22 of the annular skirt 18. The container engaging element 24 allows the sealing closure 10 to be removably fastened to a container. The container engaging element 24 is shown as a helical or spiral thread, but it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that other means may be provided for engaging the container without departing from the scope of the present invention.
An annular flange 26 is shown in its preferred form as a single uninterrupted structure. The annular flange 26 extends downwardly from the lower surface 16 of top wall 12 and radially outwardly toward the inner surface 22 of the annular skirt 18.
At least the annular flange is formed of a resilient flexible material. Preferably the whole closure is formed as a single piece of any thermoplastic material conveniently injection molded that has sufficient stiffness to give integrity to threads and sufficient flexibility to the annular flange. More preferably, the closure is formed of a polypropylene homopolymer, polypropylene random copolymer, or a polypropylene impact copolymer with a melt flow rate and flexural modulus as described in the following table:
The material currently most preferred for a closure for a thirty-two ounce container for infant formula is medium impact copolymer PP7684 E2 available from Exxon Mobil Chemical Company.
With reference to
Stop ribs 38 extend downwardly from the lower surface 16 of the top wall 12 and extend radially inwardly from the inner surface 22 of the annular skirt 18. The stop ribs 38 effectively limit the distance of upward deflection experienced by the annular flange 26. With reference to
With reference to
An annular ridge 42 extends upwardly from the upper surface 14 of the top wall 12. The annular ridge 42 has a vertical dimension at least as great as a vertical dimension of the piercing member 40. The annular ridge 42 reduces the likelihood of injury to a user or damage to surrounding objects from the piercing member 40.
With reference to
With reference to
As the sealing closure 10 is fastened to the container 50, the tip 30 of the annular flange 26 engages the upper surface 55 of the rim 54. As the sealing closure 10 is fully tightened, the rim 54 directly abuts stop ribs 38 and the inner surface 32 of the annular flange 26 seals against the rim 54 when the flange 26 flexes and deflects upwardly.
The upper surface 55 of the rim 54 often has an uneven finish and surface height variations. Due to these factors, the annular flange 26 flexes and is upwardly deflected a given distance depending on the variations. The highest portions of the uneven upper surface 55 will be engaged by the stop ribs 38 and will deflect the annular flange 26 to the maximum extent. The lowest portions of the uneven upper surface 55 will deflect the annular flange 26 to a lesser extent. The inner surface 32 of the annular flange 26 will provide an effective annular surface seal of a substantial width about the entire circumference of the uneven upper surface 55 due to the flexibility of the annular flange 26.
It is therefore seen that the present invention provides a sealing closure 10 that overcomes the failures of the prior art.
As seen in
As mentioned earlier, the uneven finish or height of the upper surfaces 55 and 60 create difficulties when attempts are made to seal to the rim 54. Prior art closures often require a liner or multiple sealing flanges to overcome this problem. The present invention avoids such additional complexity and cost. It should also be noted that an inflexible or permanently deformable sealing member would be unable to accommodate the surface variations, especially with repeated use. Accordingly, the sealing closure 10 provides an annular flange 26 that is very flexible and may be repeatedly flexed and/or deflected by the rim 54 without permanent deformation; as well as an annular flange 26 capable of being the only element sealing the rim 54 to the sealing closure 10.
Specifically, the annular flange 26 is very flexible due to the sloped inner and outer surfaces 32 and 34, as well as the bend 36 in the base 28. These features reduce the rigidity of the annular flange 26 while providing sufficient durability to withstand repeated deflection.
In addition to being very flexible and resilient, the annular flange 26 is protected from permanent deformation by the stop ribs 38. The stop ribs 38 are adapted to contact the rim 54 (or membrane 58 attached thereto) to limit a distance of upward deflection of the annular flange 26. The vertical dimension of the annular flange 26 and the stop ribs are sized so that the distance of upward deflection of the annular flange 26 is no greater than 0.03 inches. This limit on the distance of upward deflection allows the annular flange 26 to be very flexible, while at the same time limiting the risk of permanent deformation.
It is therefore seen that the present invention provides a sealing closure capable of repeatedly sealing a container without penetrating an opening in the container. The present invention further provides a sealing closure that effectively eliminates the need for a liner to maintain a seal between a container and the sealing closure. The present invention also provides a sealing closure capable of sealing a container while accommodating finish or height variations in a rim of the container.
It is therefore seen that this invention will accomplish at least all of its stated objectives.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
747461 | Millett | Dec 1903 | A |
1625963 | Snyder | Apr 1927 | A |
1854451 | Cooney | Dec 1928 | A |
1712977 | Bohnhardt | May 1929 | A |
1786802 | Wamelink | Dec 1930 | A |
2014093 | Terrill | Sep 1935 | A |
2308126 | Stover et al. | Jan 1943 | A |
2348014 | Mallard | May 1944 | A |
2364678 | White | Dec 1944 | A |
2633264 | Dinsmore et al. | Mar 1953 | A |
2731165 | Hohl | Jan 1956 | A |
3286868 | Mumford | Oct 1965 | A |
3435976 | Owens | Apr 1969 | A |
3589545 | Carpenter et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3701452 | Tonn | Oct 1972 | A |
3891118 | Laurizio | Jun 1975 | A |
4069937 | Smalley | Jan 1978 | A |
4089463 | Babiol | May 1978 | A |
4253581 | Aichinger et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4402416 | Mumford et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4549667 | Dullabaun | Oct 1985 | A |
4616759 | Mahler | Oct 1986 | A |
4821899 | Nycz et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4936483 | Ballu | Jun 1990 | A |
4957211 | Ekkert et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4993569 | Osip et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5259522 | Morton | Nov 1993 | A |
5275287 | Thompson | Jan 1994 | A |
5297688 | Beck et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337912 | Jochem | Aug 1994 | A |
5374121 | Draenert | Dec 1994 | A |
5458854 | Burns | Oct 1995 | A |
5487481 | Sander et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498333 | Canther | Mar 1996 | A |
5611446 | Ingram et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5680945 | Sander et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5941422 | Struble | Aug 1999 | A |
6021912 | Hertrampf | Feb 2000 | A |
6024234 | Rink et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6209762 | Haffner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6276543 | German et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6371319 | Yeaton et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6488165 | Hidding | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6581792 | Limanjaya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
20030121877 | Brozell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 160 798 | Jun 1973 | DE |
42 26 935 | Feb 1994 | DE |
0 146 011 | Nov 1984 | EP |
000845166 | Aug 1939 | FR |
1 489 287 | Oct 1977 | GB |
2 022 064 | May 1979 | GB |
2 235 186 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2 222 821 | Mar 1990 | GB |
2001069666 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040149675 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |