The present invention generally relates to power hand tools, and more particularly, to power reciprocating tools.
Reciprocating tools that are motor driven, such as saber saws, larger reciprocating saws and the like are usually driven by electric motors that have a rotating output shaft. The rotating motion is translated into reciprocating motion for moving a saw blade or the like in a reciprocating manner.
Reciprocating tools such as jigsaws, saber saws, as well as larger reciprocating saws are typically driven by the rotating output shaft of an electric motor. Such tools have a mechanism that translates rotary motion of the output shaft into reciprocating motion. With the recent emphasis on tool portability, drive motors are increasingly powered by rechargeable battery packs, and even relatively large reciprocating saws are now being powered by such battery packs. Because larger saws are often used for heavy duty jobs, it is important for the run time of the batteries between charges be sufficient that the user does not have to frequently change out and recharge the battery packs while working. Therefore, it is important that the design of such tools contributes to efficient operation.
Typical reciprocating saws have a plunge rod or plunger that is guided in its reciprocating movement by sliding in metal guide bushings. One of the bushings is nearly always located at the very front of the saw and is exposed to dust and debris during operation of the saw. The front bushing typically becomes loaded with dirt and also receives very little grease. Generally, poor lubrication combined with the high coefficiency of friction that sliding bushings typically have results in considerable friction heating and power loss. Sliding plunge rod action in guide bushings typically wastes 50% or more of the power used in operation because of the sliding friction. If the design is one that has counterweights to reduce vibration, such counterweights are also often designed to slide in steel guide bushings. This therefore increases waste of energy and accordingly, most commercially available battery powered reciprocating saws at the present time simply do not have counterweights. This is undesirable because the absence of counterweights substantially increases the vibration that is experienced by a user during operation.
One preferred embodiment of the present invention is a drive apparatus for a reciprocating tool that comprises a housing, a rotatable drive shaft assembly located in the housing an elongated plunger located in the housing for reciprocating motion, the plunger having a front end portion for attaching a tool thereto, a rotary joint rocker mechanism supported in the housing and operatively connected to the plunger and the drive shaft assembly so that rotation of the drive shaft assembly produces reciprocating motion of the plunger.
Another preferred embodiment is a drive apparatus for a reciprocating tool that comprises a housing, a rotatable drive shaft assembly located in the housing, an elongated plunger located in the housing for reciprocating motion, the plunger having a front end portion for attaching a tool thereto, a rotary joint rocker mechanism having an associated counterweight supported in the housing and operatively connected to the plunger and the drive shaft assembly so that rotation of the drive shaft assembly produces reciprocating motion of the plunger along a first desired path and reciprocating motion of the counterweight along a second desired path, the reciprocating motion of the counterweight being in an opposite direction of the reciprocating motion of the plunger to reduce vibration produced during operation of the apparatus, the mechanism producing motion of the plunger and counterweight along their respective desired paths without incurring any sliding friction being produced in the mechanism.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention are reciprocating drive mechanisms for a reciprocating tool such as a reciprocating saw, the general size and shape of which is similar to saws that are currently marketed. The present invention is also applicable for other types of tools such as saber saws, for example, or other types of tools that have a reciprocating action and are powered by a motor having a rotating output shaft.
As previously mentioned, because most commercially available reciprocating saws utilize a plunge rod that is guided in bushings, wherein sliding friction can consume 40% to 50% of the motor power. Sliding friction of counterweights in similar bushings can consume another 15%-20% of the motor power. Such sliding friction also causes the saw mechanism to run at higher temperatures which has the attendant effect of decreasing the life of lubricating grease in the tool and therefore decreasing the tool life.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention that are shown and described herein do not utilize guide bushings for guiding either the plunge rod or a counterweight if the preferred embodiment has a counterweight. The preferred embodiments shown and described herein utilize linkage mechanisms that have pivot connections rather than sliding components. There are significant multiple advantages including a longer run times for saws that are powered by battery packs, smaller and less expensive motors that can run at higher speeds at cooler temperatures and demonstrated improved durability. The tools can also have reciprocating counterweights that substantially reduce the amount of vibration that is generated during operation of the saw.
By employing a guide rod guiding mechanism that utilizes linkage mechanisms with needle bearings rather than poorly lubricated guide bushings, saw power consumption can be reduced by approximately 45% which leads to an approximately 80% increase in run time for a cordless, i.e., battery pack driven saw. Lowering the generated friction also lowers the operating temperature of the tool and thereby increases the comfort of the user. Significantly, linkage driven reciprocating saws can also employ counterweights with very little power loss for the reason that the counterweights are also guided by linkage mechanisms and do not require slide bushings in their design. It is expected that impending revised vibration standards will be implemented for various tools, including reciprocating saws, in the near future which will likely not be met without the employment of counterweights in their design.
While the preferred embodiments illustrated herein employ a rotatable drive shaft assembly that has an input shaft from a motor that has a pinion gear that drives a spiral gear and associated crank arm, with the crank arm driving a connecting rod to a rotary joint rocker mechanism, it should be understood that other types of rotatable drive shaft assemblies can be used, such as a scotch yoke drive, a barrel cam, gear drive or wobble arm drive, all of which are known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Turning now to the drawings, as shown in
As is best shown in
The rotary joint rocker mechanism 50 is comprised of a forward plunger guide rocker 52 and a plunger drive rocker 54 that is spaced rearwardly from the plunger guide rocker 52. The plunger 28 has a cylindrical portion 56 to which the clamping mechanism 26 is attached and it also has a relatively flat rear portion 58 with a weight reducing window 60. The plunger guide rocker 52 has a upper pivot connection 62 that interconnects the upper end portion of the rocker 52 to the rear portion 58 of the plunger 28 and a lower pivot connection 64 that connects the bottom portion of the plunger guide rocker 52 to the housing 12.
The plunger drive rocker 54 has an upper pivot connection 66 which connects the drive rocker to the rear portion 58 of the plunger 28 as well as to the outer end of the connecting rod 46. The plunger drive rocker 54 has a pivot connection 68 generally midway between its upper and lower end portions which is also connected to the housing 12. Additionally, the plunger drive rocker 54 has a lower pivot connection 70 that is not shown to be connected to anything in this embodiment but which is connected to part of a counterweight assembly which is provided in the embodiment shown in
From the foregoing, it should be understood that rotation of the spiral gear 34 causes the crank arm 38 to rotate which results in the connecting rod 46 moving the plunger drive rocker 54 from the position shown in
During reciprocating motion of the plunger 56, the configuration of the rotary joint rocker mechanism provides an orbital movement of the blade 24 during operation. As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, the orbital action aids in cutting a workpiece during operation. The amount of orbital action varies as the orientation and length (i.e., the distance between pivot connections, marked as A and B in
Also, it is possible to change the orbital path by moving the pivot connection 64 to the left or right or up and down from the location that is shown in
The embodiment of
Importantly, the counterweight structure 80 is supported only by pivot connections 70 and 78 which guide the counterweight structure 80 in a reciprocating path that is opposite that of the plunger 28. The configuration of the counterweight structure 80 provides inertia forces that are approximately equal to those that are generated by the plunger mechanism 50 which will substantially reduce vibration during operation. Also, the counterweight structure 80 is also configured so that the distribution of mass provides a center of mass that is approximately in line with the plunger axis which also contributes to the reduction in vibration to a user. Since there is no sliding contact by the counterweight structure, there is very little waste of energy caused by friction.
The only substantial friction that is experienced is in the pivot connections and that is minimized by the preferred use of needle bearings in the pivot connections. There is a very small amount of friction in the side washers on either side of the rocker and a very small amount of friction in the lip seal. In this regard and referring to
The needle bearings greatly reduce any friction and can withstand relatively high loading forces. While all of the pivot connections that have been described preferably have at least one needle bearing, it is preferred that two needle bearings be used in the pivot connection 62 which is at the forward end of the plunger 28. When the reciprocating saw is being used to cut a circular hole, for example, there may be a torque applied to the blade 24 and therefore to the plunger 28 and the use of two needle bearings in this pivot connection resists the twisting of the plunger 28 which is desired to minimize the potential damage to the rotary joint rocker mechanism 50.
Alternatively, the rotary joint needle bearings can be replaced by compliant joint mechanisms, which are generally similar to thin extremely durable leaf springs. Their use in a rotary joint rocker mechanism such as disclosed in the illustrated embodiments shown and described herein would be possible because the angular rotation of the rockers disclosed herein are within approximately plus or minus 20 degrees of movement which can be achieved with such compliant joint mechanisms. An advantage of their use is that they are essentially immune to the effects of dirt and grime and do not have to be lubricated.
As is best shown in
The seal block 108 has a cylindrical center portion 112 with an inside opening that is only slightly larger than the diameter of the plunger 28. Because the plunger 28 travels along an orbital path during operation, the seal block 108 is mounted in the nose portion 14 of the housing in a manner whereby the seal block can vertically move as well as pivot about the protrusions 110 located on each side of the seal block 108. The amount of vertical movement that can occur is a function of the length of the slot 106 in the guide channel 104, and that length is determined so that the seal block 108 does not constrain or otherwise bind the orbital movement of the plunger 28.
An elastic diaphragm 114 is also provided and it forms a static seal between the housing and the seal block 108. The diaphragm 114 is preferably made of silicon rubber but may be some other elastic material so long as it has the necessary flexibility and durability over time. The diaphragm 114 has an outer annular flange 116 that fits in a complementary shoulder 118 in the nose portion 14 and the overall configuration of the diaphragm 114 is rectangular with rounded corners as is evident. The diaphragm 114 also has an inner annular flange 120 that is slightly larger than the outside configuration of the seal block 108 so that it can slide onto the seal block 108 to form a static seal with the seal block 108. The flexibility of the diaphragm 114 is necessary so that it can move when the seal block 108 moves in response to orbital reciprocating action of the plunger 28.
As shown in
The front portion of the seal block 108 has an annular recess 128 that contains a lip seal 130 that contacts the plunger 28. An annular spring 132 is provided to bias the lip seal 130 into contact with the plunger 28 to provide a dynamic seal for the plunger 28.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that other modifications, substitutions and alternatives are apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Such modifications, substitutions and alternatives can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which should be determined from the appended claims.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1035524 | Bradley | Aug 1912 | A |
2547922 | Bechtold | Apr 1951 | A |
2601788 | Parker | Jul 1952 | A |
2619131 | Vulliet-Durand | Nov 1952 | A |
2619174 | Neale | Nov 1952 | A |
2703017 | Smith | Mar 1955 | A |
2793661 | Olson | May 1957 | A |
2858701 | Willcox | Nov 1958 | A |
3155128 | Godfrey et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3280683 | Djurberg | Oct 1966 | A |
3496972 | Rees | Feb 1970 | A |
3945120 | Ritz | Mar 1976 | A |
4498450 | Klein | Feb 1985 | A |
4941367 | Konves | Jul 1990 | A |
4989488 | Potzsch | Feb 1991 | A |
5025562 | Palm | Jun 1991 | A |
5212887 | Farmerie | May 1993 | A |
5450925 | Smith et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5555626 | Fuchs | Sep 1996 | A |
5940977 | Moores, Jr. | Aug 1999 | A |
6212781 | Marinkovich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249979 | Bednar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286217 | Dassoulas | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6568089 | Popik et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6634107 | Osada | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662455 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688005 | Tachibana et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6742267 | Marinkovich et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772662 | Marinkovich et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6877235 | Osada | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7096589 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096590 | Marinkovich et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117601 | Hai-Chun | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7188425 | Bednar et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7216433 | Haas et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7331407 | Stirm et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7448137 | Neitzell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20010007300 | Svejkovsky et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020138991 | Tachibana et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009888 | Marinkovich et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051352 | Clark, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040187324 | James et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040231170 | Neitzell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060090348 | Jiao | May 2006 | A1 |
20060180117 | Maezuru et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070074408 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080047150 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080189961 | Oberheim | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1031395 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1203628 | May 2002 | EP |
1277535 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1593448 | Nov 2005 | EP |
921857 | Dec 1945 | FR |
432063 | Jul 1935 | GB |
2042973 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2256905 | Dec 1992 | GB |
2340438 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2415661 | Jan 2006 | GB |
WO 0021707 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080189961 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |