1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a coke drum skirt connection, and more particularly to a connecting system designed to greatly reduce or eliminate the occurrence of low cycle fatigue stresses that typically manifest at and below the circumferential drum to skirt weld of a delayed coker drum as the coke drum expands and contracts during the temperature changes experienced by the coke drum during the delayed coking processes. The described connecting system securely supports the coke drum and prevents tipping of the drum, while allowing thermal contraction and expansion without undue stress to the support system, skirt or drum.
2. Background and Related Art
Many oil refineries recover valuable products from the heavy residual hydrocarbons (commonly referred to as resid or residuum) that remain following initial refining by a thermal cracking process known as delayed coking. The processing of crude oil into gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricants, and the like, as well as many other petroleum-refining operations, produces byproducts. The value of these byproducts can be substantially increased when they are processed by “destructive distillation.” During the process of destructive distillation, a portion of the byproducts is converted to usable hydrocarbon products. The remainder is transformed into a solid carbon product called coke. In the refining industry, this process is commonly known as delayed coking.
Generally, the delayed coking process involves heating the heavy hydrocarbon feed from a fractionation unit and then pumping the heated heavy feed into a large steel vessel commonly known as a coke drum. The nongaseous portion of the heated heavy feed settles out in the coke vessel where the combined effect of retention time and temperature causes the formation of coke. Vapors from the top of the coke vessel are returned to the fractionation unit for further processing into desired light hydrocarbon products. The operating conditions of delayed coking can be quite severe. Heavy feed input temperature may vary between 800 degrees Fahrenheit and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit.
Coke drums are typically large, cylindrical vessels commonly 19 to 30 feet in diameter and up to 120 feet tall having a top head and a funnel shaped bottom portion fitted with a bottom head and are usually present in pairs so that they can be operated alternately. The size, shape, and configuration of the coke drum may vary considerably from one installation to another. Coke is formed and accumulates in the vessel until it is filled to a safe margin, at which time the heated feed is switched to the empty “sister” coke vessel. This use of multiple coke drums enables the refinery to operate the fired heater and fractionation tower continuously. Thus, while one coke vessel is being filled with heated residual material, the other vessel is being cooled and cleared of coke (between 500 and 1200 tons) formed in the vessel during the previous recovery cycle. The full vessel is isolated, steamed to remove hydrocarbon vapors, cooled by filling with water, drained, opened, and the coke is drilled out with a water jet for removal out the bottom of the drum. The drums typically operate on a cycle, switching every 10 to 30 hours.
Coke removal begins with a quench step in which steam and then water are introduced into the coke-filled vessel to complete the recovery of volatile, light hydrocarbons and to cool the mass of coke. The vessel is drained, vented to atmospheric pressure, then opened at the bottom for removal of the coke. Removal is typically achieved using a drill bit fed my high pressure water directed through a jet or jets that cut the coke into small pieces which fall out the opened bottom of the coke drum. Once the coke has been removed, the drum is closed, warmed-up, and placed on stand-by, ready to repeat the 10- to 30-hour cycle.
Coke drums are largely vertical, with heights from three to four times their diameters. This large height/diameter ratio makes the coking drums susceptible to tipping due to forces such as those from strong winds, seismic activity, and piping attached to the drum. Further compounding this problem, the coke drums must be elevated to some extent to allow room underneath the coke drums for the dislodged coke to fall out and be removed during the decoking process. This increases the susceptibility of the coke drums to winds and other forces.
A typical coke drum is supported by a skirt which is welded to a lower portion of the drum. The skirt must support the weight of the drum, the coke formed in the drum and the water used to quench the drum. The skirt of the coke drum is typically bolted to a reinforced concrete base that provides the fixed support structure for the drum. This is problematic, however, for the cyclical decoking process subjects the large and heavy coke drum to frequent large temperature fluctuations which cause the drum to expand and contract. The drum is circumscribed by the skirt which expands and contracts at a rate different than the drum. The portion of the skirt that extends outwardly from the drum and which is supported by the supporting structures undergoes stresses often referred to as hoop stress. This can often be exacerbated as the skirt is insulated near the drum and not insulated in the areas farthest away from the drum. By constraining the expansion of the drum, the stresses in the skirt welded connection are incurred both during expansion and contraction of the drum. Some studies suggest that the weld between the skirt and the drum begins to fail from low cycle fatigue at peak stress locations within a few hundred cycles. Stress also occurs in the drum, the bolts and the concrete to which the drum is bolted. The failure of the system securing the coke drum to the concrete base may be gradual, difficult to monitor and costly to inspect.
Recent trends in the coking industry have elevated skirt failure concerns. Economic pressures have encouraged refineries to reduce the cycle times so that more coke may be produced in a given period. Faster production necessitates faster drum quenching causing more rapid cooling of the drum wall causing more stresses on the skirt connection.
A linked coke drum support provides a secure connection between a coke drum and supporting structures to allow for reduced-stress thermal expansion and contraction of the coke drum during operation of the coke drum during the delayed coking/decoking processes. The connection that provides for the reduced-stress thermal expansion and contraction is a pivoting link assembly affixed between the coke drum and supporting structures.
A circumferential connection plate is welded to the outside of the coke drum. This circumferential connection plate is segmented in some embodiments. Bolted or otherwise attached to the circumferential connection plate are a series of coke drum links. Pivotally connected to the coke drum links are connecting links which extend to and pivotally connect with a series of ground links. The ground links are connected to support structures such as one or several concrete or steel walls capable of supporting the weight of the coke drum. In one embodiment, the coke drum links are attached directly to the drum instead of to the circumferential connection plate. In this embodiment, backing plates may be welded to the inside of the drum to improve the strength of the connection.
When the coke drum expands, the circumferential connection plate expands causing the coke drum link to move outwardly. The connecting link, pivotally attached to both the moving coke drum link and the fixed ground link pivots along a shallow arc centered at a pivoting connecting pin joining the connecting link to the ground link. The low friction pivoting of the connecting link allows expansion and contraction of the coke drum to occur without exerting stresses on the connection between the coke drum and the supporting structures. As the connecting links are located about the circumference of the drum, circumferential expansion about the pivot axis is allowed, yet resistance to lateral loads applied to the drum such as wind is provided by those connecting links located normal to the direction of lateral load. The linkage assembly thereby allows the drum to float suspended by the connecting links, yet is still restricted from lateral movement.
The objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring now to the Figures, a description of the embodiments of the present invention will be given. It is expected that the present invention may take many other forms and shapes, hence the following disclosure is intended to be illustrative and not limiting, and the scope of the invention should be determined by reference to the appended claims.
In
The embodiment illustrated in
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/018,468, filed Jan. 23, 2008 titled Coke Drum Skirt.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
899503 | Bernhard | Sep 1908 | A |
1577487 | Otto | Mar 1926 | A |
1656355 | Huffmann | Jan 1928 | A |
1991621 | Noll | Feb 1935 | A |
2064567 | Riley | Dec 1936 | A |
2245554 | Court | Jun 1941 | A |
2317566 | Utterback | Apr 1943 | A |
2403608 | Payne et al. | Jul 1946 | A |
2562285 | Timmer | Jul 1951 | A |
2717865 | Kimberlin, Jr. et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2734715 | Knox | Feb 1956 | A |
2761160 | Manning | Sep 1956 | A |
2950897 | Bryant | Aug 1960 | A |
3215399 | McInerney et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3367625 | Fortune | Feb 1968 | A |
3379623 | Forsyth | Apr 1968 | A |
3617480 | Keel | Nov 1971 | A |
3646947 | Rochelle et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3716310 | Guenther | Feb 1973 | A |
3837356 | Selep et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3852047 | Schlinger et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4125438 | Kelly et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4174728 | Usnick et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4253487 | Worley et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4275842 | Purton et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4335733 | Richards | Jun 1982 | A |
4410398 | Chipman et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
RE31439 | Rosensweig | Nov 1983 | E |
4492103 | Naumann | Jan 1985 | A |
4531539 | Jandrasi et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4611613 | Kaplan | Sep 1986 | A |
4626320 | Alworth et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4666585 | Figgins et al. | May 1987 | A |
4726109 | Malsbury et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4738399 | Adams | Apr 1988 | A |
4771805 | Maa | Sep 1988 | A |
4773630 | Carminati et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4797197 | Mallari | Jan 1989 | A |
4824016 | Cody et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4877488 | Cody et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4923021 | Courmier et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929339 | Elliot, Jr. et al. | May 1990 | A |
4953480 | Collins, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
4960358 | Digiacomo et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973386 | Callegari et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4988411 | Schroter | Jan 1991 | A |
4993264 | Cody et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004152 | Baker et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022266 | Cody et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022268 | Wolf et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024730 | Colvert | Jun 1991 | A |
5035221 | Martin | Jul 1991 | A |
5041207 | Harrington et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5048876 | Wallskog | Sep 1991 | A |
5059331 | Goyal | Oct 1991 | A |
5107873 | Clinger | Apr 1992 | A |
5116022 | Genreith et al. | May 1992 | A |
5221019 | Pechacek et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228525 | Denney et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5228825 | Fruchtbaum et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5299841 | Schaefer | Apr 1994 | A |
5417811 | Malsbury | May 1995 | A |
5464035 | Heinecke | Nov 1995 | A |
5581864 | Rabet | Dec 1996 | A |
5633462 | Heaslip et al. | May 1997 | A |
5652145 | Cody et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5785843 | Antalffy et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800680 | Guerra | Sep 1998 | A |
5816505 | Tran et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5816787 | Brinkerhoff | Oct 1998 | A |
5876568 | Kindersley | Mar 1999 | A |
5891310 | Nelsen | Apr 1999 | A |
5907491 | Canada et al. | May 1999 | A |
5927684 | Marx et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947674 | Malsbury et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974887 | Cody et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007068 | Dellacorte | Dec 1999 | A |
6039844 | Malik | Mar 2000 | A |
6060015 | Kågstrom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066237 | Kindersley | May 2000 | A |
6113745 | Maitland et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117308 | Gangi | Sep 2000 | A |
6223925 | Malsbury et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228225 | Meher-Homji | May 2001 | B1 |
6254733 | Lu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264797 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264829 | Antalffy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286442 | Ranki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6367843 | Fetzer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6539805 | Heaslip et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547250 | Noble et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565714 | Lah | May 2003 | B2 |
6644436 | Hofmann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6644567 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660131 | Lah | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6738697 | Breed | May 2004 | B2 |
6751852 | Malsbury et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6843889 | Lah | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6926807 | Bosi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964727 | Lah | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989081 | Lah | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7033460 | Lah | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037408 | Wilborn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7115190 | Lah | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117959 | Lah | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7316762 | Lah | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7666279 | Cihlar et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20020134658 | Lah | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157897 | Hoffmann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166862 | Malsbury et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170814 | Lah | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030047153 | Kubel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030089589 | Malsbury | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127314 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159737 | Stares | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185718 | Sellakumar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040118746 | Wilborn et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040154913 | Lah | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2043604 | Oct 1995 | RU |
Entry |
---|
J. J. Kelley, “Applied Artificial Intelligence for Delayed Coking”, Hydrocarbon Processing, Nov. 2000, 144-A-144-J, Gulf Publishing Company, USA. |
Claudio Allevato & Richard S. Boswell, “Assessing the Structural Integrity and Remaining Life of Coke Drums with Acoustic Emission Testing, Stain Gaging, and Finite Element Analysis,” ETCE 99—Symposium on Plant and Facilities Reliability and Mechanical Integrity, 1999 Engineering Source Technology Conference & Exhibition, Stress Engineering Services, Inc. |
Paul J. Ellis & Christopher A. Paul, “Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals,” AlChE 1998 Spring National Meeting's International Conference on Refinery Processes Topical Conference Preprints 1998, 1998, Great Lakes Carbon Corporation. |
Zappe, R.W., Valve Selection Handbook, Fourth Edition, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, (1912) pp. 68-79,158,159,170,171,178,179,186-189. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090236212 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12018468 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12408582 | US |