The present disclosure relates to data processing, and more specifically, to linking tag selections across multiple dashboards displayed to a user.
Dashboards are used for monitoring information in many different industries and settings. As used herein, a dashboard may refer to a digital display that is designed to show data about a particular topic of interest to a computer user. A dashboard may be limited to a single page. It may include a graphical presentation of the current status and historical trends relating to metrics or performance indicators associated with the particular topic of interest.
In some configurations, dashboards may include data visualizations (e.g., summaries, charts, graphs, tables, and infographics) that are generated by widgets associated with the dashboards. As used herein, a widget may refer to a simple application or application component that is designed to output a limited set of types of data visualizations based on data inputs. The type of data inputs that a given widget can accept may be limited to a narrow topic. In some configurations, each data visualization in a particular dashboard may be situated in its own sub-view or pane within the dashboard.
According to embodiments of the present disclosure, aspects of the disclosure may include a method, a system, and a computer program product for managing a plurality of dashboards. A first data visualization is provided on a first dashboard of the plurality of dashboards. The first data visualization is based on a first set of data items and a second set of data items. Each data item of the first set of data items has at least a first tag. Each data item of the second set of data items does not have the first tag. A second data visualization is provided on a second dashboard of the plurality of dashboards. The second data visualization is based on a third set of data items and a fourth set of data items. Each data item of the third set of data items has at least the first tag. Each data item of the fourth set of data items does not have the first tag. A selection of the first tag is received. In response to the selection, a third data visualization is provided in place of the first data visualization. The third data visualization is based on the first set of data items and not based on the second set of data items. Also in response to the selection, a fourth data visualization is provided in place of the second data visualization. The fourth data visualization is based on the third set of data items and not based on the fourth set of data items.
The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure.
The drawings included in the present application are incorporated into, and form part of, the specification. They illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, along with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings are only illustrative of some embodiments and do not limit the disclosure.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Aspects of the present disclosure relate to data processing, and more specifically, to linking tag selections across multiple dashboards displayed to a user. While the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to such applications, various aspects of the disclosure may be appreciated through a discussion of various examples using this context.
In some embodiments, the data used (e.g., processed) to generate data visualizations on dashboards may be organized into data items. As used herein, a data item may refer to a small collection of related data (e.g., a piece of information). These data items may have (e.g., be tagged with) one or more tags. As used herein, a tag may refer to a keyword or term that can be assigned to a data item. A tag may be metadata that helps describe or classify the data item to which it is attached. In some embodiments, tags may be non-hierarchical, with each tag being independent of other tags. Tags may be useful in filtering, compiling, or sorting data items used to generate data visualizations. For example, a more specific data visualization could be generated in place of an original data visualization by limiting the data items used to generate the more specific data visualization to only data items having a particular tag.
In some situations it may be necessary or helpful for a computer to provide a user more than one dashboard at a time. This may occur when the user wants to see visuals about multiple facets of a single topic. For example, a librarian might want to use one dashboard that shows graphics about the current status of the library's collection of books (e.g., number of books in the collection, percent of books checked out) and also might want to use a second dashboard that shows tables about the usage of the library's vending machines (e.g., how often each vending machine is used).
While it may not be possible or desirable to have all of the relevant data visualizations displayed in a single dashboard, it may be equally undesirable to have multiple dashboards that are not linked. This may be especially true in situations where data is organized into data items having tags. For example, if two dashboards are not linked, then limiting both dashboards to include information about data items having a particular tag may require the independent selection of that tag in both dashboards. This may be cumbersome. Instead, in some embodiments, two or more dashboards may be linked together whereby a single tag selection made by a user may modify both dashboards accordingly. This may result in the ability to simultaneously filter multiple dashboards as desired by the user. In some embodiments, the two or more dashboards may be on the same or different pages (e.g., different webpages) and may be displayed in the same or different views.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Also included in the dashboard 102 and shown in
Also included in the dashboard 102 and shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In the depicted example, each original data visualization 105-108 is the same as its replacement data visualization 205-208 (in terms of display type, location on dashboard, etc.) except that the replacement data visualizations 205-208 are based only on data items having the west coast region tag. For example, while data visualization 105 is based on data items relating to all of the customers A-H, data visualization 205 is based only on data items about customers in the west coast region (as represented by having the appropriate tag). Furthermore, in the depicted example, both tag selector tools 104 and 110 are updated in response to the tag selection, so they both indicate that the west coast region tag has been selected.
Referring now to
In this example, all eight data items 311-318 are used to generate the two data visualizations 105 and 106 in
To continue this example, the selection of the west coast region tag by the company's general manager causes the data items not having that particular tag to be filtered out of the database table 301 for the purpose of generating the fifth data visualization 205 and sixth data visualization 206 of
Referring now to
As shown, application 401 includes, in some embodiments, a data collection module 411, a database 412, an analytic module 414, and an interface module 415. In use, the data collection module 411 may be configured to collect relevant data (either full data items or portions thereof) and provide the data to database 412. Analytic module 414 may be configured to obtain data items from database 412 and use those data items to generate data visualizations 402 and 404, including any necessary updates thereto. The interface module 415 may be configured to display the data visualizations 402 and 404, as well as their updates, on the first dashboard 403 and the second dashboard 405, respectively. The interface module 415 may also serve to respond to the input of a new tag selection in the tag selector tool 406. In some embodiments, tag selector tool 406 may not be located within either dashboard 403 or 405, but rather may be in its own separate display or separate view altogether.
Also, shown in a call out box in
Referring now to
While in reference to
Furthermore, in some embodiments, multiple tags could be employed at the same time. For example, in reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Also included in
An example of the system of
The tag selector tool 807 also notifies the widgets 809 and 810 of the new tag selection. In response, widgets 809 and 810 filter, based on the newly selected tag, the data items that they utilize. The data items in database 813 having the new tag are then used by the widgets 809 and 810 to generate and provide new data visualizations (not shown) in place of data visualizations 803 and 804. Similarly, the tag selector tool 808 notifies the widgets 811 and 812 of the new tag selection. In response, widgets 811 and 812 filter, based on the new tag, the data items that they utilize. The data items in database 813 having the new tag are then used by the widgets 811 and 812 to generate and provide new data visualizations (not shown) in place of data visualizations 805 and 806.
While four each of data visualizations and widgets; two each of dashboards and tag selector tools; and one each of dashboard connector module and database are shown in
Referring now to
As part of the status check, per determination block 903, the widget may determine if a new tag selection has been made on the target dashboard (for example, via a tag selector tool on the target dashboard). If a determination is made that a new tag has been selected, then the widget may, per operation 906, provide notice of the updated tag selection to a dashboard connector module. By performing operation 906, the widget may provide a way for other tag selectors on other dashboards of the multiple dashboard system to be updated so that these other tag selectors are synchronized with the tag selector tool of the target dashboard. Per operation 907, the widget may filter the data items that it relies on based on the new tag selection. Per operation 908, the widget may generate a new data visualization based on the filtered data items. The widget may, per operation 901, provide the new data visualization on the target dashboard.
If, per determination block 903, a determination is made that a new tag has not been selected, then the widget may make another determination, per determination block 904, as to whether a new tag has been selected on a non-target dashboard of the multiple dashboard system. In some embodiments, a widget may perform determination 904 by receiving notices of new tag selections from the dashboard connector module. If, per determination block 904, a determination is made that a new tag has been selected on a non-target dashboard, then the widget may filter its data items (per operation 907), generate a new data visualization based on the filtered data items (per operation 908), and provide the new data visualization on the target dashboard (per operation 901).
If, per determination block 904, a determination is made that a new tag has not been selected on a non-target dashboard, then the widget may make a third determination, per determination block 905, as to whether any data items relevant to the widget have been updated. If so, then per operation 909, the widget may generate an updated data visualization based on the updated data items and, per operation 901, the updated data visualization may be provided on the target dashboard. If, however, in determination block 905, a determination is made that there are no data updates, then the widget may continue the cycle and begin another status check, per operation 902. In some embodiments, the cycling of method 900 may continue as the multiple dashboard system is utilized.
To aid understanding, another example scenario is provided. In this example, there are two system management applications. The first systems management application includes its own dashboard that has various table-driven data visualizations that show a number of details about the systems being managed. The second systems management application includes a dashboard that has graphical charts as data visualizations. These data visualizations show information about how efficiently resources (e.g., CPU, memory, hard disk) are being used by the set of systems being managed. Each of these two applications has its own set of standalone users and customers that prefer the individual function of the application they have chosen. However, there is another set of customers that really like to use both applications. Instead of merging the two applications fully, each application could be updated to allow linking to the other.
To continue the example, in some configurations, these two applications would be completely separate and when using both applications to analyze a similar set of systems the user would have to select the set of systems twice (once per application) with each selection being made with a different selection mechanism (e.g., a different tag selector tool). This might not be a streamlined process. Further, it may be difficult to confirm that the same set of systems is selected in both applications.
In some embodiments, the two systems management applications may be linked (e.g., via a dashboard connector module). Once linked, tags selected in one application can automatically be applied in the second application. This can help to ensure that the applications are matched up and the user who prefers using both applications together is provided an easily understandable display.
Referring now to
The computer system 1001 may contain one or more general-purpose programmable central processing units (CPUs) 1002A, 1002B, 1002C, and 1002D, herein generically referred to as the CPU 1002. In some embodiments, the computer system 1001 may contain multiple processors typical of a relatively large system; however, in other embodiments the computer system 1001 may alternatively be a single CPU system. Each CPU 1002 may execute instructions stored in the memory subsystem 1004 and may comprise one or more levels of on-board cache.
In some embodiments, the memory subsystem 1004 may comprise a random-access semiconductor memory, storage device, or storage medium (either volatile or non-volatile) for storing data and programs. In some embodiments, the memory subsystem 1004 may represent the entire virtual memory of the computer system 1001, and may also include the virtual memory of other computer systems coupled to the computer system 1001 or connected via a network. The memory subsystem 1004 may be conceptually a single monolithic entity, but, in some embodiments, the memory subsystem 1004 may be a more complex arrangement, such as a hierarchy of caches and other memory devices. For example, memory may exist in multiple levels of caches, and these caches may be further divided by function, so that one cache holds instructions while another holds non-instruction data, which is used by the processor or processors. Memory may be further distributed and associated with different CPUs or sets of CPUs, as is known in any of various so-called non-uniform memory access (NUMA) computer architectures.
In some embodiments, the main memory or memory subsystem 1004 may contain elements for control and flow of memory used by the CPU 1002. This may include all or a portion of the following: a memory controller 1005, one or more memory buffers 1006A and 1006B and one or more memory devices 1025A and 1025B. In some embodiments, the memory devices 1025A and 1025B may be dual in-line memory modules (DIMMs), which are a series of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips 1007A-1007D (collectively referred to as 1007) mounted on a printed circuit board and designed for use in personal computers, workstations, and servers. The use of DRAMs 1007 in the illustration is exemplary only and the memory array used may vary in type as previously mentioned.
Although the memory bus 1003 is shown in
In some embodiments, the computer system 1001 may be a multi-user mainframe computer system, a single-user system, or a server computer or similar device that has little or no direct user interface, but receives requests from other computer systems (clients). Further, in some embodiments, the computer system 1001 may be implemented as a desktop computer, portable computer, laptop or notebook computer, tablet computer, pocket computer, telephone, smart phone, network switches or routers, or any other appropriate type of electronic device.
It is noted that
As discussed in more detail below, it is contemplated that some or all of the operations of some of the embodiments of methods described herein may be performed in alternative orders or may not be performed at all; furthermore, multiple operations may occur at the same time or as an internal part of a larger process.
The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the Figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6279016 | De Vorchik | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6995768 | Jou | Feb 2006 | B2 |
8291330 | Branson et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8711148 | Breeds et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719243 | Tobin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20060294098 | Thomson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070239746 | Masselle | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080127052 | Rostoker | May 2008 | A1 |
20080256443 | Li | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090006319 | Lehtipalo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090265631 | Sigurbjornsson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322756 | Robertson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100287135 | Bruland | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120173553 | Johansson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140033079 | Sage et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140059069 | Taft et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140280062 | Augustin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160092530 | Jakubiak | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Dalgleish, D., “Filter Multiple Pivot Tables with Excel 2010 Slicers,” http://blog.contextures.com/archives/2011/03/07/filter-multiple-pivot-tab . . . (last modified Mar. 7, 2011; last accessed Oct. 13, 2014 3:57 PM). |
Mell, P. et al., “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Special Publication 800-145, 7 pgs., Sep. 2011. |
“VMware vCenter Operations Manager Getting Started Guide,” Customer User Interface, vCenter Operations Manager 5.7.1, EN-000929-01. |
“Yet Another DataTables col. Filter (Yadcf) 0.8.5.beta.1 Multiple tables example,” http://yadcf-showcase.appspot.com/multiple_tables.html (last accessed Oct. 13, 2014 3:55 PM). |
Bertam et al., “Linking Tag Selections Across Multiple Dashboards,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/569,824, filed Dec. 15, 2014. |
IBM, “List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related.” |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160170610 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14569824 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 14572868 | US |