N/A
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights rights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to construction of beams over concrete masonry openings, and more particularly, to apparatus and methods for forming and constructing beams over openings in concrete or block constructions.
2. Description of Related Art
A lintel or header is a horizontal beam used in the construction of buildings, and is a major architectural contribution of ancient Greece. The beam usually supports masonry above a window or door opening.
There are generally four commonly employed methods of constructing a “beam” over a concrete masonry opening. The first method involves constructing a masonry beam which consists of concrete masonry units stacked over the opening, reinforced with steel, and then poured solid with concrete grout to from a composite masonry beam. The second method involves constructing a wood form system to contain a cast-in-place concrete beam above the masonry opening. The third method involves installing a precast concrete lintel over the masonry opening. The fourth method involves installing a stay-in-place lintel (steel or other material over the opening. Each of these four methods is burdened with significant drawbacks and disadvantages.
Masonry beams are constructed by placing a wood member (typically a 2×8 for 8″ wide masonry) for the bottom form and supporting the bottom form from below with shoring. Next concrete masonry is stacked on top of the bottom form with steel reinforcement installed within the beam. The entire assembly is then grouted solid with concrete (grout) and left to cure thereby forming a beam above the opening. This method, however, has a number of drawbacks. First, mortar droppings have been found to accumulate on the bottom form potentially displacing concrete and decreasing the strength of the beam. Second, the bottom of the faun must be supported by shoring at each end and along the entire span of the beam, a time consuming and labor intensive requirement. Third, the complete concrete (grout) pour can not be inspected as the only areas that are visible after the pour are the top and bottom of the beam. Thus, any intermediate areas may contain voids that weaken the beam.
Wood formed beams are typically constructed with plywood forms for the beam sides and bottom. This construction requires the installation of bracing for the plywood sides and shoring of the bottom. The entire assembly is poured solid with concrete (grout) and left to cure, thereby forming a beam above the opening. A number of drawbacks are associated with this method. First, plywood forms must be discarded after their limited lifecycle due to repeated setting, pouring, and stripping thereby increasing material costs and labor costs associated with fabricating new forms. In addition, the entire form must be supported by shoring at each end and along the entire span of the beam to support the weight of the fond and concrete. Finally, plywood forms must be custom fabricated for each beam depth and span. As with other known methods this process is labor intensive and costly.
Pre-cast concrete lintels are delivered to the jobsite and installed directly over the masonry opening. These lintels are typically either rectangular in shape or U-shaped. The rectangular lintels are typically an 8×8 rectangular beam (for 8″ masonry) with internal rebar reinforcement. The U-shaped lintels are typically an 8×8 overall dimension (for 8″ masonry) with internal rebar reinforcement. These lintels are combined with concrete masonry units stacked above and filled with grout to form a composite beam. The drawbacks associated with precast concrete lintel construction include excessive weight making theses lintels difficult to install. The typical weight of an 8×8 lintel is approximately 65 lbs. per lineal foot (plf), which translates to about 400 lbs. for a 6-foot long lintel. Similarly, the pre-cast U-shaped lintel is also heavy and thus difficult to install. The typical weight of an 8×8 U-shaped lintel is approximately 36 plf which translates to about 220 lbs. for a 6-foot long lintel. Another limitation of these lintels relates to load value. More particularly, load values for rectangular pre-cast lintels are limited by the depth of the member. Thus, the use of an 8″ high lintel limits the load that the lintel can support.
Another drawback is that rectangular lintels are not easily incorporated into reinforced masonry structures. More specifically, these lintels are not manufactured to allow for the placement of grout at each side of the opening, nor are they manufactured to allow for a composite beam above. In addition, the complete concrete (grout) pour within U-shaped lintels is not subject for inspection as the only visible area after the pour is the top of the beam. Thus, any areas below the top may contain voids thereby weakening the beam. Further, mortar droppings within a U-shaped lintel may also create a deficiency in the beam's structural value. Finally, pre-cast lintel manufactures assign load values to their lintels and composite beams. These load values vary substantially. Thus, designers must take care when specifying precast lintels and be brand specific.
Stay-in-place lintels, typically consisting of steel, are delivered to the jobsite and installed directly over the masonry opening These lintels are typically manufactured from cold formed sheet or hot rolled steel sections (or other material) which either forms the lintel itself or a composite of the two share with concrete masonry units and grout. The drawbacks associated with these lintels include the need to protect the steel by either painting or galvanization. In addition, some manufactures assign load values to their lintels and composite beams which forces designers to take care when specifying these lintels and be brand specific.
As a result of the problems faced in the art of lintel formation, the prior art reveals a number of attempts directed to providing advancements in lintel formation and construction. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,618,148, issued to Reed, discloses a composite beam structure of preformed concrete blocks with metal retaining members. U.S. Pat. No. 5,465,538, issued to Powers, Jr. a prefabricated lintel that is placed to span a doorway and a course of blocks is laid on the shoulders formed by the lintel, with a second course laid on the first course and a rebar positioned on the upper surface. A plurality of wire stirrups, each defining a rebar receiving loop, are engaged over the rebar and extend through openings in the two courses with end portions of the stirrups engaged in each of the holes defined in the upstanding legs of the lintel. The block openings are filled with grout.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,938, also issued to Powers, Jr., discloses a box lintel that includes an elongated, hollow metal form with a lower wall, integrally formed side walls extending upwardly therefrom, and integrally formed partial upper walls extending inwardly from the side walls. The form is adapted to be positioned on upright masonry supports so as to span an opening and to be filled with grout/mortar and to receive one or more courses of masonry bricks on the upper walls.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,409,764, issued to Wilnau, discloses a system for constructing the structural framework of a building or other structure of reinforced concrete using column and beam forms of sheet metal that remains in place as permanent parts of the framework after being filled with concrete. These forms are preferably factory-assembled, together with the necessary internal metal reinforcing skeletons, and shipped to the building site ready for erection of the column forms and interconnection thereof by the beam forms.
The references of the background art fail to overcome the significant limitations and disadvantages present in the formation of lintels in construction masonry constructions.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art for an improved concrete construction lintel form and forming process. The present invention substantially departs from the conventional concepts and designs of the prior art, and in doing so provides a concrete lintel form and forming process that overcomes the limitations and disadvantages present in the art.
The present invention overcomes the limitations and disadvantages in the art by providing an improved lintel form for use with masonry construction to provide a cavity for the formation of a poured concrete lintel. Additionally, the form can support concrete masonry block placed on top of the form prior to the placement of concrete (grout) pouring. This allows for one single pour in which the lintel is created. The forms are removed after the poured lintel has cured. Unlike prior art systems, the finished lintel is easy to inspect for voids. A form in accordance with the present invention is lightweight for ease of shipping and handling. Once on the job site, the form can be cut to a desired length and used. Once the beam has cured, the form may be removed and re-used.
A concrete lintel form in accordance with the present invention comprises a pair of elongate side members for installation in opposing face-to-face relation spanning a structure opening, such as a window or door opening to form a lintel form cavity. Each form member comprises a generally vertical side wall having inwardly projecting top and bottom legs running the substantially the entire length of the member. The top legs function to support masonry block stacked on top of the form to allow for the construction of a composite cast in place beam. The bottom legs function to support a bottom form that may be inserted after masonry has been stacked and secured with mortar, thereby allowing the workers to leave an opening that allows mortar droppings to fall through and not collect in the form. In addition, each form member includes at least one outwardly projecting stiffener running substantially the entire length of the member between the top and bottom. The stiffener functions to resist outward expansion of the form as concrete is placed into the form thereby minimizing bracing requirements. The form may be fabricated from extruded plastic or plastic blend, extruded aluminum or aluminum blend, or fiber reinforced polymer (“FRP”). In a preferred embodiment, the form is fabricated from FRP via a pultrusion process.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved concrete construction lintel form and forming process.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form that is light-weight for ease of shipping, handling, and installation.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form adapted to yield a composite cast-in-place beam or a typical cast-in-place concrete beam.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form that yields such a cast-in-place beam capable of visual inspection.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form adapted to support a removable bottom.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form fabricated from pultruded FRP.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel form that is reusable.
In accordance with these and other objects, which will become apparent hereinafter, the instant invention will now be described with particular reference to the accompanying drawings.
With reference to the drawings,
In a preferred embodiment, form members 10 are fabricated from fiber-reinforced polymer (“FRP”) using a pultrusion process. Fabricating form members 10 from FRP provides a form that is sufficiently strong, lightweight, and durable such that the forms are capable of repeated use. The form members may, however, be fabricated from extruded plastic or plastic blend, extruded aluminum or aluminum blend, or fiber reinforced polymer (“FRP”), with out departing from the scope of the present invention.
A further significant aspect of the present invention relates to providing support apparatus for the lintel form members.
A further significant aspect of the present invention involves providing clamps for supporting lintel form members.
Yet another significant aspect of the present invention relates to providing shore support structure for mid span support.
The instant invention has been shown and described herein in what is considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment. It is recognized, however, that departures may be made therefrom within the scope of the invention and that obvious modifications will occur to a person skilled in the art.
This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/902,802, filed on Feb. 22, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1101484 | Clark | Jun 1914 | A |
1119969 | Longevin | Dec 1914 | A |
1285051 | Cramer | Nov 1918 | A |
1374717 | Bolton | Apr 1921 | A |
1502092 | Duncan et al. | Jul 1924 | A |
1502323 | Acher | Jul 1924 | A |
1628385 | Bauer | May 1927 | A |
1965686 | Bruce | Jul 1934 | A |
1997876 | Sheldon | Apr 1935 | A |
2218705 | Faber | Oct 1940 | A |
2618148 | Reed | Nov 1952 | A |
3224154 | Toti et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3341991 | Dupre | Sep 1967 | A |
3376011 | Petchuk | Apr 1968 | A |
3837135 | Zachman | Sep 1974 | A |
4185804 | Baculo | Jan 1980 | A |
4409764 | Wilnau | Oct 1983 | A |
4580388 | Maisch | Apr 1986 | A |
4646496 | Wilnau | Mar 1987 | A |
5317847 | Scairono | Jun 1994 | A |
5465538 | Powers, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5927041 | Sedlmeier et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6167669 | Lanc | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6560938 | Powers, Jr. | May 2003 | B1 |
20030102421 | Mertens | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060179738 | Parrino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60902802 | Feb 2007 | US |