1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a masonry wall system and, more particularly, to an above ground lentil supported masonry wall having post tensioning elements.
2. Description of Related Art
The use of masonry walls is well known in the prior art. The significant pressures exerted by heaving soil due to freezing and melting of water requires prior art masonry walls to incorporate a significant amount of steel in the form of reinforcing bars extending through the voids or cells in the masonry block and into a foundation or a footer. A variety of other techniques have also been used in the prior art in an attempt to strengthen the wall and to provide sufficient resistance to the pressure caused by the soil pressing against the bottom of the wall; these techniques are usually complicated and are always expensive. Some prior art techniques have incorporated post tensioning rods wherein courses of block have been compressed with respect to each other and the compressed courses are then secured in some manner to a foundation. These latter techniques usually require expensive installation provisions for appropriately supporting the compressed courses on the designated foundation or footing.
The present invention incorporates a masonry wall structure that utilizes a foundation or footing for supporting a lentil upon which the courses of masonry block are built. Post tensioning rods are imbedded in concrete within the lentil and extend upwardly essentially vertically from the lentil. A plurality of courses of masonry block are then placed on the lentil with the respective post tensioning rods extending through the cells therein and beyond the next to the top course of the masonry blocks. Clamping plates extend across the cells of selected masonry blocks in the next to the top course of blocks and include an opening therein to permit the passage of the threaded end of a respective post tensioning rod. The end of each of the post tensioning rods receive a nut which is placed on the rod and threaded to engage the clamping plate and a predetermined tension is placed on the respective post tensioning rod. A top course of masonry blocks is laid with the cells therein receiving the threaded rod ends engaging the nuts and the cells are filled with grout. A column or post of H-shaped blocks defining slots on opposed sides and having an internal vertical space extends upwardly from a corresponding foundation or footing. Alternatively, such a post may be constructed of other blocks, bricks, etc. to define the slots and the vertical space. Post tensioning rods extend from within the footing upwardly through the center cells of the H blocks and is secured to the top of the post by a nut bearing against a clamping plate to post tension each post. For cost reasons or other considerations, rebar extending from the footing and grouted within the vertical space may be used in place of the tensioning rods. The lintel and lintel supported wall extend from within the laterally oriented slots in opposing relationship of adjacent posts. If the footing is at ground level, a starter course of masonry or plate is placed thereon to support the lintel above ground and the post extends upwardly therefrom. In an alternate embodiment, each lintel supported wall rests upon the footing or upon a plate on the footing and a post tensioning rod extends from within the footing upwardly through the end of the wall and is secured by a nut and clamping plate.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide an above ground block or brick wall.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an above ground lintel for supporting a block or brick wall between adjacent posts.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an above ground lintel supported block or brick wall having tensioning rods extending upwardly from within the lintel.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a lintel supported block or brick wall disposed between posts constructed of H blocks and nesting within the opposing slots of adjacent posts that accommodate vertical movement of the lintel supported wall.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a lintel supported block or brick wall secured to a footing at opposed ends by tension rods extending from within the footing and upwardly through a significant height of the wall.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a plurality of lintel supported wall sections each end of which is supported by a footing to locate the lintel above ground.
A yet further object of the present invention is to provide a method for constructing an above ground block or brick wall supported at the opposed ends by a footing and in slidable engagement with slots disposed in columns extending from the footings.
A yet further object of the present invention is to provide a method for providing post tensioning rods to anchor a lintel supported block or brick wall above ground.
A yet further object of the present invention is to provide a lintel supported wall attached to a footing at each opposed end by post tensioning rods.
These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art as the description of the invention proceeds.
The present invention will be described with greater specificity and clarity with reference to the following drawings, in which:
Referring to
Below ground foundations or footings 20, 22 support plates 24, 26 upon which posts 28, 30, respectively, are built. Preferably, these posts are of blocks known as H blocks and are commercially available from various sources. The posts also may be columns built in the conventional manner to provide vertical slots on opposed sides and a vertical space extending therethrough. A lintel 32 is supported by plates 24, 26 and nests within vertical slots 52, 54 formed in each of posts 28, 30. A plurality of courses of blocks are built upon the lintel and also extend into the slots of the posts. As illustrated, wall 16 may include post tensioning rods to greatly enhance the structural strength of the wall.
Referring jointly to
Referring jointly to
Referring to
Wall 16 is built as set forth above. That is, lintel 32 is laid upon plates 106 and tensioning rods 60 set in grout therein and extend upwardly therefrom. Furthermore, tensioning rods 102, 104 extend through the aperture or opening in the lintel. Thereafter, blocks 66 are laid in the conventional manner with tension rods 60 and 102, 104 extending therethrough. Each of these tensioning rods is anchored by a clamping plate in penetrable engagement with the respective threaded end 110. A nut 112 is brought into threaded engagement with each threaded end for placing the respective tensioning rod in tension. Top course 76 is added in the conventional manner.
By inspection of
By using both tensioning rods 60 within wall 60 and tensioning rods 102, 104 at the respective ends of the wall, the wall is maintained in significant compression. Such compression adds very measurably to the structural rigidity and robustness of the wall. Furthermore, tensioning rods 102, 104 are a significant factor to resist tilting of the wall due to externally imposed forces. As tensioning rods 102, 104 serve the function of posts 28, 30 (see
Where the strength resulting from use of tensioning rods is not necessary, rebars or like rods could be used as substitutes for the tensioning rods in the embodiments described above.
The robustness of wall 60 has a further subtle, but important attribute. When the ground heaves to an extent sufficient to contact the underside of lintel 32, forces are imposed on the lintel and the wall extending upwardly therefrom. These forces may be sufficient to stress the wall sufficiently to compromise its integrity unless the stresses are relieved. As is evident from the above description, wall 60 is located with opposed slots of the posts but it is not mechanically attached to the slots. Accordingly, the wall can rise within the slots in the posts at opposed ends upon an application of a lifting force on the lintel. Thereby, the stresses due to heaving of the ground sufficient to contact the lintel can and are relieved by a resulting upward sliding of the wall and the integrity of the wall structure will not be compromised.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
957048 | Francis | May 1910 | A |
2057018 | Dillon | Oct 1936 | A |
2815656 | Klein et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
3512759 | Resler | May 1970 | A |
3537220 | Ellis | Nov 1970 | A |
4064668 | Carter | Dec 1977 | A |
4353194 | Norton | Oct 1982 | A |
4426815 | Brown | Jan 1984 | A |
4452028 | Norton et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4726567 | Greenberg | Feb 1988 | A |
4750306 | Granieri | Jun 1988 | A |
4821483 | Adams | Apr 1989 | A |
5007218 | Bengtson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5501057 | Dawson | Mar 1996 | A |
5623797 | Gravier et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5794921 | Greenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5864999 | Wallin | Feb 1999 | A |
5893254 | Troiani et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6431797 | Greenberg | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6557830 | Sutter | May 2003 | B2 |
6560938 | Powers, Jr. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564524 | Gruita | May 2003 | B1 |
6571521 | Ameigh | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6632048 | Greenberg | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6735913 | Sanders et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6758020 | Cerrato | Jul 2004 | B2 |
20020166302 | Ogorchock | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009970 | MacDonald et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050086881 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |