According to the World Health Organization, respiratory diseases are the number one cause of world-wide mortality, with at least 20% of the world's population afflicted. Over 25 million Americans have chronic lung disease, making it the number one disabler of American workers (>$50 B/yr), and the number three cause of mortality.
Currently, most infections are treated with oral or injectable antiinfectives, even when the pathogen enters through the respiratory tract. Often the antiinfective has poor penetration into the lung, and may be dose-limited due to systemic side-effects. Many of these issues can be overcome by local delivery of the antiinfective to the lungs of patients via inhalation. For example, inhaled tobramycin (TOBI®, Chiron Corp, Emeryville, Calif.), is a nebulized form of tobramycin, that has been shown to have improved efficacy and reduced nephro- and oto-toxicity relative to injectable aminoglycosides. Unfortunately, rapid absorption of the drug necessitates that the drug product be administered twice daily over a period of ca., 20 min per administration. For pediatrics and young adults with cystic fibrosis this treatment regimen can be taxing, especially when one takes into account the fact that these patients are on multiple time-consuming therapies. Any savings in terms of treatment times would be welcomed, and would likely lead to improvements in patient compliance. Achieving improved compliance with other patient populations (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute bronchial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis) will be critically dependent on the convenience and efficacy of the treatment. Hence, it is an object of the present invention to improve patient compliance by providing formulations with sustained activity in the lungs. Sustained release formulations of antiinfectives are achieved by encapsulating the antiinfective in a liposome. Improving pulmonary targeting with sustained release formulations would further improve the therapeutic index by increasing local concentrations of drug and reducing systemic exposure. Improvements in targeting are also expected to reduce dose requirements.
Achieving sustained release of drugs in the lung is a difficult task, given the multiple clearance mechanisms that act in concert to rapidly remove inhaled drugs from the lung. These clearance methods include: (a) rapid clearance from the conducting airways over a period of hours by the mucociliary escalator; (b) clearance of particulates from the deep lung by alveolar macrophages; (c) degradation of the therapeutic by pulmonary enzymes, and; (d) rapid absorption of small molecule drugs into the systemic circulation. Absorption of small molecule drugs has been shown to be nearly quantitative, with an absorption time for hydrophilic small molecules of about 1 hr, and an absorption time for lipophilic drugs of about 1 min.
For TOBI® the absorption half-life from the lung is on the order of 1.5 hr. High initial peak concentrations of drug can lead to adaptive resistance, while a substantial time with levels below or near the effective minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), may lead to selection of resistant phenotypes. It is hypothesized that keeping the level of antiinfective above the MIC for an extended period of time (i.e., eliminating sub-therapeutic trough levels) with a pulmonary sustained release formulation may reduce the potential for development of resistant phenotypes. Hence, it is a further object of the present invention to maintain the ratio of the area under the lung concentration/time curve to the MIC at 24 hr (i.e., the AUIC), not only at an adequate sustained therapeutic level, but above a critical level, so as to reduce the potential for selection of resistant strains.
It is assumed that only the “free” (un-encapsulated) drug has bactericidal activity. One potential disadvantage of liposomal sustained release formulations is that the encapsulation of drug in the liposomal formulation decreases the concentration of free drug reaching the lung pathogens, drug which is needed to achieve efficient killing of bacteria immediately following administration. Hence, it is further an object of the present invention to provide a formulation that contains sufficient free drug, to be bactericidal immediately following administration.
The disclosures of the foregoing are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
It is an object of the present invention to use lipid-based composition encapsulation to improve the therapeutic effects of antiinfectives administered to an individual via the pulmonary route.
The subject invention results from the realization that administering a pharmaceutical composition comprising both free and liposome encapsulated antiinfective results in improved treatment of pulmonary infections.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a system for treating or providing prophylaxis against a pulmonary infection, wherein the system comprises a pharmaceutical formulation comprising mixtures of free and lipid-based composition encapsulated antiinfective, wherein the amount of free antiinfective is sufficient to provide for immediate bactericidal activity, and the amount of encapsulated antiinfective is sufficient to provide sustained bactericidal activity, and reduce the development of resistant strains of the infectious agent, and an inhalation delivery device.
The free form of the antiinfective is available to provide a bolus of immediate antimicrobial activity. The slow release of antiinfective from the lipid-based composition following pulmonary administration is analogous to continuous administration of the antiinfective, thereby providing for sustained levels of antiinfective in the lungs. The sustained AUC levels provides prolonged bactericidal activity between administrations. Further, the sustained levels provided by the release of antiinfective from the lipid-based composition is expected to provide improved protection against the development of resistant microbial strains.
Combinations of free and encapsulated drug can be achieved by: (a) formulation of mixtures of free and encapsulated drug that are stable to the nebulization; (b) formulation of encapsulated drug which leads to burst on nebulization.
The ratio of free to encapsulated drug is contemplated to be between about 1:100 w:w and about 100:1 w:w, and may be determined by the minimum inhibitory concentration of the infectious agent and the sustained release properties of the formulation. The ratio of free to encapsulated drug can be optimized for a given infectious agent and drug formulation based on known pharmacodynamic targets for bacterial killing and prevention of resistance. Schentag, J. J. J. Chemother. 1999, 11, 426-439.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the aforementioned system wherein the antiinfective is selected from the group consisting of antibiotic agents, antiviral agents, and antifungal agents. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is an antibiotic selected from the group consisting of cephalosporins, quinolones, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, beta lactamase inhibitors, carbepenems, monobactams, macrolides, lincosamines, glycopeptides, rifampin, oxazolidonones, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, streptogramins, and sulfonamides. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is an aminoglycoside. In a further embodiment the antiinfective is amikacin, gentamicin, or tobramycin.
In a further embodiment, the lipid-based composition is a liposome. In a further embodiment, the liposome comprises a mixture of unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar vesicles. In a further embodiment, the liposome comprises a phospholipid and a sterol. In a further embodiment, the liposome comprises a phosphatidylcholine and a sterol. In a further embodiment, the liposome comprises dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a sterol. In a further embodiment, the liposome comprises dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and cholesterol.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the aforementioned system wherein the antiinfective is an aminoglycoside and the liposome comprises DPPC and cholesterol. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is amikacin, the liposome comprises DPPC and cholesterol, and the liposome comprises a mixture of unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar vesicles.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the aforementioned system, wherein the ratio by weight of free antiinfective to antiinfective encapsulated in a lipid-based composition is between about 1:100 and about 100:1. In a further embodiment, the ratio by weight is between about 1:10 and about 10:1. In a further embodiment, the ratio by weight is between about 1:2 and about 2:1.
In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method for treating or providing prophylaxis against a pulmonary infection in a patient, the method comprising: administering an aerosolized pharmaceutical formulation comprising the antiinfective to the lungs of the patient, wherein the pharmaceutical formulation comprises mixtures of free and lipid-based composition encapsulated antiinfectives, and the amount of free antiinfective is sufficient to provide for bactericidal activity, and the amount of encapsulated antiinfective is sufficient to reduce the development of resistant strains of the infectious agent.
In a further embodiment, the aforementioned method comprises first determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antiinfective for inhibiting pulmonary infections, and wherein the amount of free antiinfective is at least 2 times the MIC, preferably greater than 4 times the MIC, and preferably greater than 10 times the MIC of the antiinfective agent, where the MIC is defined as either the minimum inhibitory concentration in the epithelial lining of the lung, or alternatively the minimum inhibitory concentration in the solid tissue of the lung (depending on the nature of the infection).
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the aforementioned method, wherein the aerosolized pharmaceutical formulation is administered at least once per week.
In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to the aforementioned method, wherein the antiinfective is selected from the group consisting of antibiotic agents, antiviral agents, and antifungal agents. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is an antibiotic selected from the group consisting of cephalosporins, quinolones, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, beta lactamase inhibitors, carbepenems, monobactams, macrolides, lincosamines, glycopeptides, rifampin, oxazolidonones, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, streptogramins, and sulfonamides. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is an aminoglycoside. In a further embodiment, the antiinfective is amikacin, gentamicin, or tobramycin.
In a further embodiment, the lipid-based composition is a liposome. In a further embodiment, the liposome encapsulated antiinfective comprises a phosphatidylcholine in admixture with a sterol. In a further aspect, the sterol is cholesterol. In a further aspect, the liposome encapsulated antiinfective comprises a mixture of unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar vesicles. In a further aspect, the liposome encapsulated antiinfective comprises a phosphatidylcholine in admixture with cholesterol, and wherein the liposome encapsulated antiinfective comprises a mixture of unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar vesicles.
The ratio of the area under the lung concentration/time curve to the MIC at 24 hr (i.e., the AUIC) is greater than 25, preferably greater than 100, and preferably greater than 250.
The therapeutic ratio of free/encapsulated drug and the required nominal dose can be determined with standard pharmacokinetic models, once the efficiency of pulmonary delivery and clearance of the drug product are established with the aerosol delivery device of choice.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of treating a patient for a pulmonary infection comprising a cycle of treatment with lipid-based composition encapsulated antiinfective to enhance bacterial killing and reduce development of phenotypic resistance, followed by a cycle of no treatment to reduce the development of adaptive resistance. The treatment regimen may be determined by clinical research. In one embodiment, the treatment regime may be an on-cycle treatment for about 7, 14, 21, or 30 days, followed by an off-cycle absence of treatment for about 7, 14, 21, or 30 days.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for reducing the loss of antiinfective encapsulated in lipid-based compositions upon nebulization comprising administering the antiinfective encapsulated in lipid-based compositions with free antiinfective.
The systems and methods of the present invention are useful for treating, for example, lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiectasis, acterial pneumonia, and in acute bronchial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). In addition, the technology is useful in the treatment of intracellular infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and inhaled agents of bioterror (e.g., anthrax and tularemia). The technology may also be used as a phophylactic agent to treat opportunistic fungal infections (e.g., aspergillosis) in immunocompromised patients (e.g., organ transplant or AIDS patients).
With bacteria and other infective agents becoming increasingly resistant to traditional treatments, new and more effective treatments for infective agent related illnesses are needed. The present invention addresses these issues by providing a system comprising a pharmaceutical composition comprising both free and lipid-based composition encapsulated antiinfective and an inhalation device. Formulating the antiinfective as a mixture of free and lipid-based composition encapsulated antiinfective provides several advantages, some of which include: (a) provides for a bolus of free antiinfective for immediate bactericidal activity and a sustained level of antiinfective for prevention of resistance; (b) simplifies the manufacturing process, as less free antiinfective need be removed via diafiltration; and (c) allows for greater antiinfective contents to be achieved in the drug product.
These embodiments of the present invention, other embodiments, and their features and characteristics, will be apparent from the description, drawings and claims that follow.
For convenience, before further description of the present invention, certain terms employed in the specification, examples and appended claims are collected here. These definitions should be read in light of the remainder of the disclosure and understood as by a person of skill in the art. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or to more than one (i.e. to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, “an element” means one element or more than one element.
The term “antibacterial” is art-recognized and refers to the ability of the compounds of the present invention to prevent, inhibit or destroy the growth of microbes of bacteria.
The terms “antiinfective” and “antiinfective agent” are used interchangeably throughout the specification to describe a biologically active agent which can kill or inhibit the growth of certain other harmful pathogenic organisms, including but not limited to bacteria, yeasts and fungi, viruses, protozoa or parasites, and which can be administered to living organisms, especially animals such as mammals, particularly humans.
The term “antimicrobial” is art-recognized and refers to the ability of the compounds of the present invention to prevent, inhibit or destroy the growth of microbes such as bacteria, fungi, protozoa and viruses.
The term “bioavailable” is art-recognized and refers to a form of the subject invention that allows for it, or a portion of the amount administered, to be absorbed by, incorporated to, or otherwise physiologically available to a subject or patient to whom it is administered.
The terms “comprise” and “comprising” are used in the inclusive, open sense, meaning that additional elements may be included.
The term “illness” as used herein refers to any illness caused by or related to infection by an organism.
The term “including” is used herein to mean “including but not limited to”. “Including” and “including but not limited to” are used interchangeably.
The term “lipid-based composition” as used herein refers to compositions that primarily comprise lipids. Non-limiting examples of lipid-based compositions may take the form of coated lipid particles, liposomes, emulsions, micelles, and the like.
The term “mammal” is known in the art, and exemplary mammals include humans, primates, bovines, porcines, canines, felines, and rodents (e.g., mice and rats).
The term “microbe” is art-recognized and refers to a microscopic organism. In certain embodiments the term microbe is applied to bacteria. In other embodiments the term refers to pathogenic forms of a microscopic organism.
A “patient,” “subject” or “host” to be treated by the subject method may mean either a human or non-human animal.
The term “pharmaceutically-acceptable salts” is art-recognized and refers to the relatively non-toxic, inorganic and organic acid addition salts of compounds, including, for example, those contained in compositions of the present invention.
The term “prodrug” is art-recognized and is intended to encompass compounds which, under physiological conditions, are converted into the antibacterial agents of the present invention. A common method for making a prodrug is to select moieties which are hydrolyzed under physiological conditions to provide the desired compound. In other embodiments, the prodrug is converted by an enzymatic activity of the host animal or the target bacteria.
The term “treating” is art-recognized and refers to curing as well as ameliorating at least one symptom of any condition or disease.
Lipids
The lipids used in the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention can be synthetic, semi-synthetic or naturally-occurring lipids, including phospholipids, tocopherols, sterols, fatty acids, glycoproteins such as albumin, negatively-charged lipids and cationic lipids. In terms of phospholipids, they could include such lipids as egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC), egg phosphatidylglycerol (EPG), egg phosphatidylinositol (EPI), egg phosphatidylserine (EPS), phosphatidylethanolamine (EPE), and phosphatidic acid (EPA); the soya counterparts, soy phosphatidylcholine (SPC); SPG, SPS, SPI, SPE, and SPA; the hydrogenated egg and soya counterparts (e.g., HEPC, HSPC), other phospholipids made up of ester linkages of fatty acids in the 2 and 3 of glycerol positions containing chains of 12 to 26 carbon atoms and different head groups in the I position of glycerol that include choline, glycerol, inositol, serine, ethanolamine, as well as the corresponding phosphatidic acids. The chains on these fatty acids can be saturated or unsaturated, and the phospholipid may be made up of fatty acids of different chain lengths and different degrees of unsaturation. In particular, the compositions of the formulations can include dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), a major constituent of naturally-occurring lung surfactant. Other examples include dimyristoylphosphatidycholine (DMPC) and dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG) dipalmitoylphosphatidcholine (DPPQ and dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG) distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPQ and distearoylphosphatidylglycerol (DSPG), dioleylphosphatidyl-ethanolamine (DOPE) and mixed phospholipids like palmitoylstearoylphosphatidyl-choline (PSPC) and palmitoylstearolphosphatidylglycerol (PSPG), and single acylated phospholipids like mono-oleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (MOPE).
The sterols can include, cholesterol, esters of cholesterol including cholesterol hemi-succinate, salts of cholesterol including cholesterol hydrogen sulfate and cholesterol sulfate, ergosterol, esters of ergosterol including ergosterol hemi-succinate, salts of ergosterol including ergosterol hydrogen sulfate and ergosterol sulfate, lanosterol, esters of lanosterol including lanosterol hemi-succinate, salts of lanosterol including lanosterol hydrogen sulfate and lanosterol sulfate. The tocopherols can include tocopherols, esters of tocopherols including tocopherol hemi-succinates, salts of tocopherols including tocopherol hydrogen sulfates and tocopherol sulfates. The term “sterol compound” includes sterols, tocopherols and the like.
The cationic lipids used can include ammonium salts of fatty acids, phospholipids and glycerides. The fatty acids include fatty acids of carbon chain lengths of 12 to 26 carbon atoms that are either saturated or unsaturated. Some specific examples include: myristylamine, palmitylamine, laurylamine and stearylamine, dilauroyl ethylphosphocholine (DLEP), dimyristoyl ethylphosphocholine (DMEP), dipalmitoyl ethylphosphocholine (DPEP) and distearoyl ethylphosphocholine (DSEP), N-(2, 3-di-(9-(Z)-octadecenyloxy)-prop-1-yl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (DOTMA) and 1, 2-bis(oleoyloxy)-3-(trimethylammonio)propane (DOTAP).
The negatively-charged lipids which can be used include phosphatidyl-glycerols (PGs), phosphatidic acids (PAs), phosphatidylinositols (Pls) and the phosphatidyl serines (PSs). Examples include DMPG, DPPG, DSPG, DMPA, DPPA, DSPA, DMPI, DPPI, DSPI, DMPS, DPPS and DSPS.
Phosphatidylcholines, such as DPPC, aid in the uptake by the cells in the lung (e.g., the alveolar macrophages) and helps to sustain release of the bioactive agent in the lung. The negatively charged lipids such as the PGs, PAs, PSs and PIs, in addition to reducing particle aggregation, are believed to play a role in the sustained release characteristics of the inhalation formulation as well as in the transport of the formulation across the lung (transcytosis) for systemic uptake. The sterol compounds are believed to affect the release characteristics of the formulation.
Liposomes
Liposomes are completely closed lipid bilayer membranes containing an entrapped aqueous volume. Liposomes may be unilamellar vesicles (possessing a single membrane bilayer) or multilamellar vesicles (onion-like structures characterized by multiple membrane bilayers, each separated from the next by an aqueous layer). The bilayer is composed of two lipid monolayers having a hydrophobic “tail” region and a hydrophilic “head” region. The structure of the membrane bilayer is such that the hydrophobic (nonpolar) “tails” of the lipid monolayers orient toward the center of the bilayer while the hydrophilic “heads” orient towards the aqueous phase.
Liposomes can be produced by a variety of methods (for a review, see, e.g., Cullis et al. (1987)). Bangham's procedure (J. Mol. Biol. (1965)) produces ordinary multilamellar vesicles (MLVs). Lenk et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,522,803, 5,030,453 and 5,169,637), Fountain et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,578) and Cullis et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,282) disclose methods for producing multilamellar liposomes having substantially equal interlamellar solute distribution in each of their aqueous compartments. Paphadjopoulos et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,871, discloses preparation of oligolamellar liposomes by reverse phase evaporation.
Unilamellar vesicles can be produced from MLVs by a number of techniques, for example, the extrusion of Cullis et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,008,050) and Loughrey et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,421)). Sonication and homogenization cab be so used to produce smaller unilamellar liposomes from larger liposomes (see, for example, Paphadjopoulos et al. (1968); Deamer and Uster (1983); and Chapman et al. (1968)).
The original liposome preparation of Bangham et al. (J. Mol. Biol., 1965, 13:238-252) involves suspending phospholipids in an organic solvent which is then evaporated to dryness leaving a phospholipid film on the reaction vessel. Next, an appropriate amount of aqueous phase is added, the 60 mixture is allowed to “swell”, and the resulting liposomes which consist of multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) are dispersed by mechanical means. This preparation provides the basis for the development of the small sonicated unilamellar vesicles described by Papahadjopoulos et al. (Biochim. Biophys, Acta., 1967, 135:624-638), and large unilamellar vesicles.
Techniques for producing large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs), such as, reverse phase evaporation, infusion procedures, and detergent dilution, can be used to produce liposomes. A review of these and other methods for producing liposomes may be found in the text Liposomes, Marc Ostro, ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1983, Chapter 1, the pertinent portions of which are incorporated herein by reference. See also Szoka, Jr. et al., (1980, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 9:467), the pertinent portions of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
Other techniques that are used to prepare vesicles include those that form reverse-phase evaporation vesicles (REV), Papahadjopoulos et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,871. Another class of liposomes that may be used are those characterized as having substantially equal lamellar solute distribution. This class of liposomes is denominated as stable plurilamellar vesicles (SPLV) as defined in U.S. Pat. No. 4,522,803 to Lenk, et al. and includes monophasic vesicles as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,578 to Fountain, et al. and frozen and thawed multilamellar vesicles (FATMLV) as described above.
A variety of sterols and their water soluble derivatives such as cholesterol hemisuccinate have been used to form liposomes; see specifically Janoff et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,721,612, issued Jan. 26, 1988, entitled “Steroidal Liposomes.” Mayhew et al., PCT Publication No. WO 85/00968, published Mar. 14, 1985, described a method for reducing the toxicity of drugs by encapsulating them in liposomes comprising alpha-tocopherol and certain derivatives thereof. Also, a variety of tocopherols and their water soluble derivatives have been used to form liposomes, see Janoff et al., PCT Publication No. 87/02219, published Apr. 23, 1987, entitled “Alpha Tocopherol-Based Vesicles”.
The liposomes are comprised of particles with a mean diameter of approximately 0.01 microns to approximately 3.0 microns, preferably in the range about 0.2 to 1.0 microns. The sustained release property of the liposomal product can be regulated by the nature of the lipid membrane and by inclusion of other excipients (e.g., sterols) in the composition.
Infective Agent
The infective agent included in the scope of the present invention may be a bacteria. The bacteria can be selected from: Pseudomonas aeruginosa., Bacillus anthracis, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmenellosis, Yersina pestis, Mycobacterium leprae, M. africanum, M. asiaticum, M. avium-intracellulaire, M. chelonei abscessus, M. fallax, M. fortuitum, M. kansasii, M. leprae, M. malmoense, M. shimoidei, M. simiae, M. szulgai, M. xenopi, M. tuberculosis, Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis, Brucella abortus, Brucella canis, Legionella pneumonophilia, Francisella tularensis, Pneumocystis carinii, mycoplasma, and Burkholderia cepacia.
The infective agent included in the scope of the present invention can be a virus. The virus can be selected from: hantavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, and viral pneumonia.
The infective agent included in the scope of the present invention can be a fungus. Fungal diseases of note include: aspergillosis, disseminated candidiasis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, mucormycosis, and sporotrichosis.
Antiinfectives
The term antiinfective agent is used throughout the specification to describe a biologically active agent which can kill or inhibit the growth of certain other harmful pathogenic organisms, including but not limited to bacteria, yeasts and fungi, viruses, protozoa or parasites, and which can be administered to living organisms, especially animals such as mammals, particularly humans.
Non-limiting examples of antibiotic agents that may be used in the antiinfective compositions of the present invention include cephalosporins, quinolones and fluoroquinolones, penicillins, and beta lactamase inhibitors, carbepenems, monobactams, macrolides and lincosamines, glycopeptides, rifampin, oxazolidonones, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, streptogramins, sulfonamides, and others. Each family comprises many members.
Cephalosporins
Cephalosporins are further categorized by generation. Non-limiting examples of cephalosporins by generation include the following. Examples of cephalosporins I generation include Cefadroxil, Cefazolin, Cephalexin, Cephalothin, Cephapirin, and Cephradine. Examples of cephalosporins II generation include Cefaclor, Cefamandol, Cefonicid, Cefotetan, Cefoxitin, Cefprozil, Ceftmetazole, Cefuroxime, Cefuroxime axetil, and Loracarbef. Examples of cephalosporins III generation include Cefdinir, Ceftibuten, Cefditoren, Cefetamet, Cefpodoxime, Cefprozil, Cefuroxime (axetil), Cefuroxime (sodium), Cefoperazone, Cefixime, Cefotaxime, Cefpodoxime proxetil, Ceftazidime, Ceftizoxime, and Ceftriaxone. Examples of cephalosporins IV generation include Cefepime.
Quinolones and Fluoroquinolones
Non-limiting examples of quinolones and fluoroquinolones include Cinoxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Enoxacin, Gatifloxacin, Grepafloxacin, Levofloxacin, Lomefloxacin, Moxifloxacin, Nalidixic acid, Norfloxacin, Ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, Trovafloxacin, Oxolinic acid, Gemifloxacin, and Perfloxacin.
Penicillins
Non-limiting examples of penicillins include Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Bacampicillin, Carbenicillin Indanyl, Mezlocillin, Piperacillin, and Ticarcillin.
Penicillins and Beta Lactamase Inhibitors
Non-limiting examples of penicillins and beta lactamase inhibitors include Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Sulfactam, Tazobactam, Benzylpenicillin, Cloxacillin, Dicloxacillin, Methicillin, Oxacillin, Penicillin G (Benzathine, Potassium, Procaine), Penicillin V, Penicillinase-resistant penicillins, Isoxazoylpenicillins, Aminopenicillins, Ureidopenicillins, Piperacillin+Tazobactam, Ticarcillin+Clavulanic Acid, and Nafcillin.
Carbepenems
Non-limiting examples of carbepenems include Imipenem-Cilastatin and Meropenem.
Monobactams
A non-limiting example of a monobactam includes Aztreonam.
Macrolides and Lincosamines
Non-limiting examples of macrolides and lincosamines include Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Clindamycin, Dirithromycin, Erythromycin, Lincomycin, and Troleandomycin.
Glycopeptides
Non-limiting examples of glycopeptides include Teicoplanin and Vancomycin.
Rifampin
Non-limiting examples of rifampins include Rifabutin, Rifampin, and Rifapentine.
Oxazolidonones
A non-limiting example of oxazolidonones includes Linezolid.
Tetracyclines
Non-limiting examples of tetracyclines include Demeclocycline, Doxycycline, Methacycline, Minocycline, Oxytetracycline, Tetracycline, and Chlortetracycline.
Aminoglycosides
Non-limiting examples of aminoglycosides include Amikacin, Gentamicin, Kanamycin, Neomycin, Netilmicin, Streptomycin, Tobramycin, and Paromomycin.
Streptogramins
A non-limiting example of streptogramins includes Quinopristin+Dalfopristin.
Sulfonamides
Non-limiting examples of sulfonamides include Mafenide, Silver Sulfadiazine, Sulfacetamide, Sulfadiazine, Sulfamethoxazole, Sulfasalazine, Sulfisoxazole, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, and Sulfamethizole.
Others
Non-limiting examples of other antibiotic agents include Bacitracin, Chloramphenicol, Colistemetate, Fosfomycin, Isoniazid, Methenamine, Metronidazol, Mupirocin, Nitrofurantoin, Nitrofurazone, Novobiocin, Polymyxin B, Spectinomycin, Trimethoprine, Trimethoprine/Sulfamethoxazole, Cationic peptides, Colistin, Iseganan, Cycloserine, Capreomycin, Pyrazinamide, Para-aminosalicyclic acid, and Erythromycin ethylsuccinate+sulfisoxazole.
Antiviral agents include, but are not limited to: zidovudine, acyclovir, ganciclovir, vidarabine, idoxuridine, trifluridine, ribavirin, interferon alpha-2a, interferon alpha-2b, interferon beta, interferon gamma).
Anifungal agents include, but are not limited to: amphotericin B, nystatin, hamycin, natamycin, pimaricin, ambruticin, itraconazole, terconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole, miconazole, nikkomycin Z, griseofulvin, candicidin, cilofungin, chlotrimazole, clioquinol, caspufungin, tolnaftate.
Dosages
The dosage of any compositions of the present invention will vary depending on the symptoms, age and body weight of the patient, the nature and severity of the disorder to be treated or prevented, the route of administration, and the form of the subject composition. Any of the subject formulations may be administered in a single dose or in divided doses. Dosages for the compositions of the present invention may be readily determined by techniques known to those of skill in the art or as taught herein.
In certain embodiments, the dosage of the subject compounds will generally be in the range of about 0.01 ng to about 10 g per kg body weight, specifically in the range of about 1 ng to about 0.1 g per kg, and more specifically in the range of about 100 ng to about 10 mg per kg.
An effective dose or amount, and any possible affects on the timing of administration of the formulation, may need to be identified for any particular composition of the present invention. This may be accomplished by routine experiment as described herein, using one or more groups of animals (preferably at least 5 animals per group), or in human trials if appropriate. The effectiveness of any subject composition and method of treatment or prevention may be assessed by administering the composition and assessing the effect of the administration by measuring one or more applicable indices, and comparing the post-treatment values of these indices to the values of the same indices prior to treatment.
The precise time of administration and amount of any particular subject composition that will yield the most effective treatment in a given patient will depend upon the activity, pharmacokinetics, and bioavailability of a subject composition, physiological condition of the patient (including age, sex, disease type and stage, general physical condition, responsiveness to a given dosage and type of medication), route of administration, and the like. The guidelines presented herein may be used to optimize the treatment, e.g., determining the optimum time and/or amount of administration, which will require no more than routine experimentation consisting of monitoring the subject and adjusting the dosage and/or timing.
While the subject is being treated, the health of the patient may be monitored by measuring one or more of the relevant indices at predetermined times during the treatment period. Treatment, including composition, amounts, times of administration and formulation, may be optimized according to the results of such monitoring. The patient may be periodically reevaluated to determine the extent of improvement by measuring the same parameters. Adjustments to the amount(s) of subject composition administered and possibly to the time of administration may be made based on these reevaluations.
Treatment may be initiated with smaller dosages which are less than the optimum dose of the compound. Thereafter, the dosage may be increased by small increments until the optimum therapeutic effect is attained.
The use of the subject compositions may reduce the required dosage for any individual agent contained in the compositions (e.g., the FabI inhibitor) because the onset and duration of effect of the different agents may be complimentary.
Toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of subject compositions may be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures in cell cultures or experimental animals, e.g., for determining the LD50 and the ED50.
The data obtained from the cell culture assays and animal studies may be used in formulating a range of dosage for use in humans. The dosage of any subject composition lies preferably within a range of circulating concentrations that include the ED50 with little or no toxicity. The dosage may vary within this range depending upon the dosage form employed and the route of administration utilized. For compositions of the present invention, the therapeutically effective dose may be estimated initially from cell culture assays.
Pharmaceutical Formulation
The pharmaceutical formulation of the antiinfective may be comprised of either an aqueous dispersion of liposomes and free antiinfective, or a dehydrated powder containing liposomes and free antiinfective. The formulation may contain lipid excipients to form the liposomes, and salts/buffers to provide the appropriate osmolarity and pH. The dry powder formulations may contain additional excipients to prevent the leakage of encapsulated antiinfective during the drying and potential milling steps needed to create a suitable particle size for inhalation (i.e., 1-5 μm). Such excipients are designed to increase the glass transition temperature of the antiinfective formulation. The pharmaceutical excipient may be a liquid or solid filler, diluent, solvent or encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting any subject composition or component thereof from one organ, or portion of the body, to another organ, or portion of the body. Each excipient must be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the subject composition and its components and not injurious to the patient. Suitable excipients include trehalose, raffinose, mannitol, sucrose, leucine, trileucine, and calcium chloride. Examples of other suitable excipients include (1) sugars, such as lactose, and glucose; (2) starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; (3) cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate; (4) powdered tragacanth; (5) malt; (6) gelatin; (7) talc; (8) excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; (9) oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; (10) glycols, such as propylene glycol; (11) polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, and polyethylene glycol; (12) esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; (13) agar; (14) buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; (15) alginic acid; (16) pyrogen-free water; (17) isotonic saline; (18) Ringer's solution; (19) ethyl alcohol; (20) phosphate buffer solutions; and (21) other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations.
Inhalation Device
The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may be used in any dosage dispensing device adapted for intranasal administration. The device should be constructed with a view to ascertaining optimum metering accuracy and compatibility of its constructive elements, such as container, valve and actuator with the nasal formulation and could be based on a mechanical pump system, e.g., that of a metered-dose nebulizer, dry powder inhaler, soft mist inhaler, or a nebulizer. Due to the large administered dose, preferred devices include jet nebulizers (e.g., PARI LC Star, AKITA), soft mist inhalers (e.g., PARI e-Flow), and capsule-based dry powder inhalers (e.g., PH&T Turbospin). Suitable propellants may be selected among such gases as fluorocarbons, hydrocarbons, nitrogen and dinitrogen oxide or mixtures thereof.
The inhalation delivery device can be a nebulizer or a metered dose inhaler (MDI), or any other suitable inhalation delivery device known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The device can contain and be used to deliver a single dose of the antiinfective compositions or the device can contain and be used to deliver multi-doses of the compositions of the present invention.
A nebulizer type inhalation delivery device can contain the compositions of the present invention as a solution, usually aqueous, or a suspension. In generating the nebulized spray of the compositions for inhalation, the nebulizer type delivery device may be driven ultrasonically, by compressed air, by other gases, electronically or mechanically. The ultrasonic nebulizer device usually works by imposing a rapidly oscillating waveform onto the liquid film of the formulation via an electrochemical vibrating surface. At a given amplitude the waveform becomes unstable, whereby it disintegrates the liquids film, and it produces small droplets of the formulation. The nebulizer device driven by air or other gases operates on the basis that a high pressure gas stream produces a local pressure drop that draws the liquid formulation into the stream of gases via capillary action. This fine liquid stream is then disintegrated by shear forces.
The nebulizer may be portable and hand held in design, and may be equipped with a self contained electrical unit. The nebulizer device may comprise a nozzle that has two coincident outlet channels of defined aperture size through which the liquid formulation can be accelerated. This results in impaction of the two streams and atomization of the formulation. The nebulizer may use a mechanical actuator to force the liquid formulation through a multiorifice nozzle of defined aperture size(s) to produce an aerosol of the formulation for inhalation. In the design of single dose nebulizers, blister packs containing single doses of the formulation may be employed.
In the present invention the nebulizer may be employed to ensure the sizing of particles is optimal for positioning of the particle within, for example, the pulmonary membrane.
A metered dose inhalator (MDI) may be employed as the inhalation delivery device for the compositions of the present invention. This device is pressurized (pMDI) and its basic structure comprises a metering valve, an actuator and a container. A propellant is used to discharge the formulation from the device. The composition may consist of particles of a defined size suspended in the pressurized propellant(s) liquid, or the composition can be in a solution or suspension of pressurized liquid propellant(s). The propellants used are primarily atmospheric friendly hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) such as 134a and 227. Traditional chloroflourocarbons like CFC-11, 12 and 114 are used only when essential. The device of the inhalation system may deliver a single dose via, e.g., a blister pack, or it may be multi dose in design. The pressurized metered dose inhalator of the inhalation system can be breath actuated to deliver an accurate dose of the lipid-containing formulation. To insure accuracy of dosing, the delivery of the formulation may be programmed via a microprocessor to occur at a certain point in the inhalation cycle. The MDI may be portable and hand held.
The nebulized liposomal amikacin contains a mixture of encapsulated (ca., 60%) and free amikacin (ca., 40%). Following inhalation in healthy volunteers the corrected nominal dose was 100 mg as determined by gamma scintigraphy.
Liposomal preparations of amikacin may exhibit significant leakage of encapsulated drug during nebulization. As detailed in Table 1 below, the presence of free amikacin in solution was shown to surprisingly decrease the leakage of antiinfective by about four-fold from the liposome. While not wishing to be limited to any particular theory, it is hypothesized that liposomes break-up and re-form during nebulization, losing encapsulated antiinfective in the process. Alternatively, encapsulated antiinfective is lost during nebulization because the liposome membrane becomes leaky. When an excess of free antiinfective is present in solution, the free antiinfective is readily available in close proximity to the liposome, and is available to be taken back up into the liposome on re-formation.
Wherein n is the number of measurements.
All of the patents and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/527,213, filed Jun. 19, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/634,343, filed Dec. 5, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,226,975, which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/748,468, filed Dec. 8, 2005, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4235871 | Papahadjopoulos et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4372949 | Kodama et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4394448 | Szoka, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4396630 | Riedl et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4451447 | Kaplan et al. | May 1984 | A |
4515736 | Deamer | May 1985 | A |
4522803 | Lenk et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4547490 | Ecanow et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4588578 | Fountain et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606939 | Frank et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4684625 | Eppstein et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4693999 | Axelsson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4721612 | Janoff et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4767874 | Shima et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4833134 | Kishimoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
4857311 | Domb et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4895452 | Yiournas et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4895719 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897384 | Janoff et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4933121 | Law et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4952405 | Yau-Young | Aug 1990 | A |
4963367 | Ecanow | Oct 1990 | A |
4975282 | Cullis et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4981692 | Popescu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5000958 | Fountain et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006343 | Benson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5008050 | Cullis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023087 | Yau-Young | Jun 1991 | A |
5030453 | Lenk et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041278 | Janoff et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049388 | Knight et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5049389 | Radhakrishnan | Sep 1991 | A |
5059421 | Loughrey et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059591 | Janoff et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077056 | Bally et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5169637 | Lenk et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178876 | Khokhar et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192549 | Barenolz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211955 | Legros et al. | May 1993 | A |
5252339 | Cristofori et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5264618 | Felgner et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269979 | Fountain | Dec 1993 | A |
5279833 | Rose | Jan 1994 | A |
5316771 | Barenholz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320906 | Eley et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334761 | Gebeyehu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5409704 | Bally et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5459127 | Felgner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5508269 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540936 | Coe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543152 | Webb et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569464 | Endo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578320 | Janoff et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5610198 | Barry, III et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616334 | Janoff et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631018 | Zalipsky et al. | May 1997 | A |
5641662 | Debs et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643599 | Lee et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662929 | Lagace et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5665383 | Grinstaff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5723147 | Kim et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736155 | Bally et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741516 | Webb et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5753613 | Ansell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756120 | Hersch et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756121 | Bracken | May 1998 | A |
5756353 | Debs | May 1998 | A |
5759571 | Hersch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766627 | Sankaram et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785987 | Hope et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795589 | Mayer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820848 | Boni et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5837279 | Janoff et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837282 | Fenske et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840702 | Bedwell | Nov 1998 | A |
5843473 | Woodle et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849490 | Schonwetter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861159 | Pardoll et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871710 | Bogdanov et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875776 | Vaghefi | Mar 1999 | A |
5922350 | Janoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945122 | Abra et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958449 | Hersch et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5993850 | Sankaram et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045828 | Bystrom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051251 | Zalipsky et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051549 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6086851 | Boni et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090407 | Knight et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106858 | Ye et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124273 | Drohan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147060 | Zasloff et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162462 | Bolotin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6211162 | Dale et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221388 | Hersch et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6274175 | Gombotz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338859 | Leroux et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348069 | Vacanti et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352996 | Cao et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387886 | Montgomery et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419901 | Placke et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6440393 | Waldrep et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443898 | Unger et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447753 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6451784 | Placke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458373 | Lambert et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468532 | Hsei et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475779 | Mathiowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6492560 | Wilbur et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497901 | Royer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509323 | Davis et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511676 | Boulikas | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6521211 | Unger et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521736 | Watterson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6596305 | Edgerly-Plug | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599912 | Au et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613352 | Lagace et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6615824 | Power | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6843942 | Katinger et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6855296 | Baker et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6900184 | Cohen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916490 | Garver et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6948491 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962151 | Knoch et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6991809 | Anderson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7063860 | Chancellor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7100600 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7331339 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7368102 | Tarara et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7544369 | Boni et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7600511 | Power et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7718189 | Boni et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7748377 | Smith et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7879351 | Li et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7971588 | Fink et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8100162 | Joern et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8226975 | Weers | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010006660 | Lagace et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020035061 | Krieger et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020086852 | Cantor et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020187105 | Zou et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030059375 | Perez-Soler et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030118636 | Friesen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138481 | Zadi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030224039 | Boni et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009126 | Pilkiewicz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101553 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040142025 | MacLachlan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142026 | Boni et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050019926 | Gonda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042341 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050113337 | Taneja et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050214224 | Weers et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220752 | Charmot et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249795 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060067998 | Kurzrock et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073198 | Boni et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070077290 | Li et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070081963 | Oh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070196461 | Weers | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080089927 | Malinin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080246472 | Igney et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090104256 | Gupta | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090269396 | Cipolla et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274754 | Cipolla et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100068257 | Boni et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100196455 | Malinin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100260829 | Boni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110159079 | Li et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120010162 | Norling | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130028960 | Weers | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130052260 | Weers | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071468 | Weers | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130071469 | Weers | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130089598 | Gupta | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130136788 | Gupta | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0069307 | Jan 1983 | EP |
2145107 | Mar 1985 | GB |
63-500175 | Jan 1988 | JP |
63-239213 | May 1988 | JP |
10-511363 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2006-028069 | Feb 2006 | JP |
WO 8500968 | Mar 1985 | WO |
WO 8606959 | Dec 1986 | WO |
WO 8700043 | Jan 1987 | WO |
WO 8702219 | Apr 1987 | WO |
WO 8804573 | Jun 1988 | WO |
WO 9116882 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9312240 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9412155 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9412156 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9422430 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO 9608235 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9619199 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9619972 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9729851 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9930686 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9965466 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0027359 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0029103 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 00045791 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0118280 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0132246 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0232400 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0243699 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03045965 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03075889 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03075890 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004054499 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004110346 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2007011940 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007067520 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007117509 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007117550 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008137717 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008137917 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2010045209 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,830, mailed Mar. 7, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/062469, mailed Sep. 18, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/062469, dated Nov. 10, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,412, mailed Dec. 2, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/250,412, mailed Jun. 27, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/062868, mailed Sep. 18, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/062868, dated Nov. 10, 2009. |
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2009303542, dated Jun. 20, 2012. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980140740.2, dated Jul. 3, 2012. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 592217, mailed Sep. 1, 2011. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/060468, mailed Jun. 24, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2009/060468, dated Apr. 19, 2011. |
Office Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2003304204, mailed Jun. 25, 2008. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2504317, dated Jan. 27, 2011. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2504317, dated Jun. 16, 2010. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200380106534.2, dated Aug. 11, 2006. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200380106534.2 [no date]. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200380106534.2, dated May 22, 2009. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 03816990.0, mailed Jan. 12, 2009. |
Summons to Attend Oral Hearing for European Application No. 03816990.0, mailed Dec. 21, 2011. |
Office Action for European Application No. 03816990.0, mailed Jun. 17, 2011. |
Office Action for European Application No. 03816990.0, mailed Apr. 24, 2009. |
Office Action for European Application No. 03816990.0, mailed Jun. 5, 2012. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 168279, dated Nov. 3, 2010. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 168279, dated Aug. 17, 2009. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 168279, dated Jun. 23, 2008. |
Decision of Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-500829, dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-500829, dated Feb. 15, 2011. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-500829, dated Jul. 6, 2010. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2005-7007679, dated Dec. 26, 2011. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2005-7007679, dated Jan. 18, 2011. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/004580, mailed Aug. 25, 2009. |
Third Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/004580, mailed Dec. 10, 2008. |
Second Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/004580, mailed May 9, 2008. |
First Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/004580, mailed Jan. 30, 2008. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 540087, dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 540087, dated Sep. 14, 2006. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/696,389, mailed Nov. 14, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/696,389, mailed Mar. 28, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/696,389, mailed Oct. 10, 2007. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/696,389, mailed Apr. 2, 2007. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2003/034240, mailed Jul. 12, 2005. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/000195, mailed Feb. 1, 2012. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/000195, mailed Jul. 27, 2011. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 564543, mailed Jan. 4, 2008. |
Examiner's First Report for Australian Application No. 2006270008, dated Dec. 10, 2010. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680034397.X, dated Feb. 9, 2011. |
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680034397.X, dated Jan. 22, 2010. |
Office Action for Egyptian Patent Application No. PCT 84/2008. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 06787716.7, mailed Dec. 29, 2011. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 188406, dated Jun. 13, 2011. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 188406, dated Apr. 26, 2010. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-522895, dated Apr. 17, 2012. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/000425, dated Jun. 2, 2010. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 565300, dated Feb. 24, 2011. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 565300, dated Nov. 11, 2009. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 565300, dated May 31, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/185,448, mailed Dec. 17, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/185,448, mailed Jun. 30, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/027859, mailed Aug. 14, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/027859, dated Jan. 22, 2008. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/012684, dated Jul. 8, 2011. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/012684, dated Apr. 5, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,859, mailed Jun. 4, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,859, mailed Sep. 11, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/008404, mailed Sep. 26, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2007/008404, dated Oct. 21, 2008. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11159754, mailed Jun. 22, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,177, mailed Mar. 16, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,177, mailed Aug. 31, 2011. |
Office Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2006322076, mailed Sep. 23, 2011. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-544430, mailed May 26, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Jan. 17, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Aug. 4, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Apr. 5, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Sep. 14, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Feb. 23, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/634,343, mailed Jun. 19, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/046360, mailed Oct. 17, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/046360, dated Jun. 11, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,343, mailed Oct. 21, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,343, mailed May 10, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/008500, mailed Sep. 26, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2007/008500, dated Oct. 21, 2008. |
Zhang, X. et al., “Antibacterial drug treatment of community acquired pneumonia,” Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 4(4):258-260 (2005). |
Huang, L. et al., “Progress of liposome's applications in biomedicine,” International Journal of Biologicals, 29(3):130-132 and 137 (2006). |
Allen, T. M. et al., “Effect of liposome size and drug release properties of pharmacokinetics of encapsulated drug to rats,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 226(2):539-544 (1983). |
Alton et al., “Cationic lipid-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the lungs and nose of patients with cystic fibrosis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet, 353(9157):947-954 (1999). |
Andrews, J. M., “Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 48(S1):5-14 (2001). |
Antos, M. et al., “Antibacterial activity of liposomal amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro,” Pharmacological Research, 32(1/2):84-87 (1995). |
Bakker-Woudenberg, I. et al., “Efficacy of gentamicin or ceftazidine entrapped in liposomes with prolonged blood circulation and enhanced localization in Klebsiella pneumoniae-infected lung tissue,” The Journal Infectious Diseases, 171:938-947 (1995). |
Ball, V. et al., “Complexation mechanism of bovine serum albumin and poly(allylamine hydrochloride),” J. Phys. Chem. B., 106(9):2357-2364 (2002). |
Bangham, A. D., Introduction, “Liposomes: An Historical Perspective,” in: Liposomes, Ostro, M. J. (ed.), pp. 1-29, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1983). |
Bargoni, A. et al., “Transmucosal transport of tobramycin incorporated in solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) after duodenal administration to rats. Part I I—Tissue distribution,” Pharmacological Research, 43(5):497-502 (2001). |
Beaulac, C. et al., “Eradication of Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Fluid Liposome-Encapsulated Tobramycin in an Animal Model of Chronic Pulmonary Infection,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 40(3):665-669 (1996). |
Beaulac, C. et al., “In-vitro bactericidal efficacy of sub-MIC concentrations of liposome-encapsulated antibiotic against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 41:35-41 (1998). |
Beaulac, C. et al., “Aerolization of low phase transition temperature liposomal tobramycin as a dry powder in an animal model of chronic pulmonary infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal Drug Targeting, 7(1):33-41 (1999). |
Beaulac, C. et al., “In vitro kinetics of drug release and pulmonary retention of microencapsulated antibiotic in liposomal formulations in relation to the lipid composition,” Journal Microencapsulation 14(3):335-348 (1997). |
Bermudez, L. E. et al., “Treatment of disseminated mycobacterium avium complex infection of beige mice with liposome-encapsulated aminoglycosides,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 161:1262-1268 (1999). |
Bucke, W. E. et al., “Surface-modified amikacin-liposomes: organ distribution and interaction with plasma proteins,” Journal of Drug Targeting, 5(2):99-108 (1997). |
Bunderberg de Jong, H. G. et al., Koazevation (Entmischung in Kolloidalen Systemen), Koll, Zeitsch, 50(10):39-48 (1930). |
Carlier, M. B. et al., “Inhibition of lysosomal phospholipases by aminoglycoside antibiotics: in vitro comparative studies,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 23(3):440-449 (1983). |
Cantin, A. M. et al., “Aerosolized prolastin suppresses bacterial proliferation in a model of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 160:1130-1135 (1999). |
Cash, H. A. et al., “A rat model of chronic respiratory infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” American Review of Respiratory Disease, 119(3):453-459 (1979). |
Challoner, P. B. et al., “Gamma Scintigraphy Lung Deposition Comparison of TOBI in the PARI LC PLUS Nebulizer and the Aerodose Inhaler,” American Thoracic Society 97th International Conference, San Francisco, California, Aerogen, Inc. (2001). |
Chambless, J. D. et al., “A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 72(3):2005-2013 (2006). |
Chapman, D., “Physicochemical Properties of Phospholipids and Lipid-Water Systems,” In: Liposome Technology, Chapter 1, vol. I, Preparation of Liposomes, Gregoriadis G. (ed.), CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 1-18 (1984). |
Chmiel, J. F. et al., “State of the art: why do the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis become infected and why can't they clear the infection?”, Respiratory Research, 4:8-20 (2003). |
Comis, R. L., “Carboplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a review,” Oncology, 50(2):37-41 (1993). |
Costerton, J. W. et al., “Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections,” Science, 284:1318-1322 (1999). |
Couvreur, P. et al., “Liposomes and nanoparticles in the treatment of intracellular bacterial infections,” Pharmaceutical Research, 8(9):1079-1085 (1991). |
Cynamon, M. H. et al., “Liposome-Encapsulated-Amikacin Therapy of Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection in Geige Mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 33(8):1179-1183 (1989). |
Damaso, D. et al., “Susceptibility of current clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enteric gram-negative bacilli to amikacin and other aminoglycoside antibiotics,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 134:S394-S390 (1976). |
Dees, C. et al., “The mechanism of enhanced intraphagocytic killing of bacteria by liposomes containing antibiotics,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 24:135-146 (1990). |
Demaeyer, P. et al., “Disposition of liposomal gentamicin following intrabronchial administration in rabbits,” Journal Microencapsulation, 10(1):77-88 (1993). |
Deol, P. et al., “Lung specific stealth liposomes: stability, biodistribution and toxicity of liposomal antitubular drugs in mice,” Biochemica et Biophysica Acta, 1334:161-172 (1997). |
Dong, C. et al., “Acacia-gelatin microencapsulated liposomes: preparation, stability and release of acetylsalicylic acid,” Pharmaceutical Research, 10(1):141-146 (1993). |
Doring, G. et al., “Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus,” Eur Respir J., 16(4):749-767 (2000). |
Drenkard, E. et al., “Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation,” Nature, 416:740-743 (2002). |
Ehlers, S. et al., “Liposomal amikacin for treatment of M. avium Infections in clinically relevant experimental settings,” Zbl. Bakt., 284:218-231 (1996). |
Fielding, R. M. et al., “Pharmacokinetics and Urinary Excretion of Amikacin in Low-Clearance Unilamellar Liposomes after a Single or Repeated Intravenous Administration in the Rhesus Monkey,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 43(3):503-509 (1999). |
Fountain, M. W. et al., “Treatment of Brucella canis and Brucella abortus in vitro and in vivo by stable plurilamellar vesicle-encapsulated aminoolycosides,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 152(3):529-535 (1985). |
Geller, D. E. et al., “Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of aerosolized tobramycin in cystic fibrosis,” Chest, 122(1):219-226 (2002). |
Gibson, R. L. et al., “Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 168(8):918-951 (2003). |
Gibson, R. L. et al., “Significant microbiological effect of inhaled tobramycin in young children with cystic fibrosis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 167(6):841-849 (2003). |
Gilbert, B. E. et al., “Tolerance of volunteers to cyclosporine A-dilauroylphosphatidylcholine liposome aerosol,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 156(6):1789-1793 (1997). |
Gleiser, C. A. et al., “Pathology of experimental respiratory anthrax in Macaca mulatta,” Brit. J. Exp. Path., 44:416-426 (1963). |
Gonzales-Rothi, R. J. et al., “Liposomes and pulmonary alveolar macrophages: functional and morphologic interactions,” Experimental Lung Research, 17:685-705 (1991). |
Goss, C. H. et al., “Update on cystic fibrosis epidemiology,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 10(6):510-514 (2004). |
Gunther, A. et al., “Surfactant alteration and replacement in acute respiratory distress syndrome,” Respiratory Research, 2(6): 353-364 (2001). |
Hagwood, S. et al., “Structure and properties of surfactant protein B,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta., 1408:150-160 (1998). |
Hansen, C. R. et al., “Long-term azithromycin treatment of cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: an observational cohort study,” Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 4(1):35-40 (2005). |
Hoffman, L. R. et al., “Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation,” Nature, 436:1171-1175 (2005). |
Howell, S. B., “Clinical applications of a novel sustained-release injectable drug delivery system: Depofoam Technology,” Cancer Journal, 7:219-227 (2001). |
Hrkach, J. S. et al., “Synthesis of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-lysine) graft copolymers,” Macromolecules, 28:4736-4739 (1995). |
Hrkach, J. S. et al., “Poly(L-Lactic acid-co-amino acid) graft copolymers: a class of functional biodegradable biomaterials,” In: Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers for Bioapplications, Chapter 8, ACS Symposium Series No. 627, Ottenbrite, R. M. et al. (eds.), American Chemical Society, pp. 93-102 (1996). |
Hung, O. R. et al., “Pharmacokinetics of inhaled liposome-encapsulated fentanyl,” Anesthesiology, 83(2): 277-284 (1995). |
Hunt, B. E. et al., “Macromolecular mechanisms of sputum inhibition of tobramycin activity,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 39(1):34-39 (1995). |
Ikegami, M. et al., “Surfactant protein metabolism in vivo,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1408:218-225 (1998). |
Janoff, A. S. et al., “Unusual lipid structures selectively reduce the toxicity of amphotericin B,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:6122-6126 (1988). |
Johansson, J., “Structure and properties of surfactant protein C,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1408:161-172 (1998). |
Katare, O. P. et al., “Enhanced in vivo Performance of Liposomallndomethacin Derived From Effervescent Granule Based Proliposomes,” J. Microencapsulation, 12(5):487-493 (1995). |
Kesavalu, L. et al., “Differential effects of free and liposome encapsulated amikacin on the survival of Mycobacterium avium complex in mouse peritoneal macrophages,” Tubercle, 71:215-218 (1990). |
Kim, E. K. et al., “Pharmacokinetics of intravitreally injected liposomes encapsulated tobramycin in normal rabbits,” Yonsei Medical Journal, 31(4):308-314 (1990). |
Klemens, S. P. et al., “Liposome-encapsulated-gentamicin therapy of Mycobacterium avium complex infection in beige mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 34(6):967-970 (1990). |
Knoch, M. et al., “The customised electronic nebuliser: a new category of liquid aerosol drug delivery systems,” Expert Opin. Drug Deliv., 2(2):377-390 (2005). |
Lagace, J. et al., “Liposome-encapsulated antibiotics: preparation, drug release and antimicrobial activity against Pseudomona aeruginosa,” Journal Microencapsulation, 8(1) 53-61 (1991). |
Landyshev, Y. S. et al., “Clinical and experimental aspects of liposomal hydrocortisone treatment of bronchial asthma,” Ter. Arkh., 74(8):45-48 (2002). |
Lass, J. S. et al., “New advances in aerosolised drug delivery: vibrating membrane nebuliser technology,” Expert Opin Drug Deliv., 3(5):693-702 (2006). |
Le Brun, P. P. H. et al., “A review of the technical aspects of drug nebulization,” Pharmacy World & Science, 22(3):75-81 (2000). |
Le Brun, P. P. H. et al., “Inhalation of tobramycin in cystic fibrosis part 1: The choice of a nebulizer,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 189:205-214 (1999). |
Le Brun, P. P. H. et al., “Inhalation of tobramycin in cystic fibrosis part 2: Optimization of the tobramycin solution for a jet and ultrasonic nebulizer,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 189:215-225 (1999). |
Le Brun, P. P. H. et al., “Dry powder inhalation of antibiotics in cystic fibrosis therapy: part 2. Inhalation of a novel colistin dry powder formulation: a feasibility study in healthy volunteers and patients,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 54:25-32 (2002). |
Lutwyche, P. et al., “Intracellular delivery and antibacterial activity of gentamicin encapsulated in pH-sensitive liposomes,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 42(10):2511-2520 (1998). |
Marier, J. F. et al., “Liposomal tobramycin against pulmonary infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a pharmacokinetic and efficacy study following single and multiple intratracheal administrations in rats,” Journal Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 52:247-252 (2003). |
Marier, J-F. et al., “Pharmacokinetics and efficacies of liposomal and conventional formulations of tobramycin after intratracheal administration in rats with pulmonary burkholderia cepacia infection,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 46(12):3776-3781 (2002). |
Martini, W. Z. et al., “Lung surfactant kinetics in conscious pigs,” Am J Physiol., 277(1 Pt 1): E187-E195 (1999). |
McALLISTER, S. M. et al., “Antimicrobial properties of liposomal polymyxin B,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 43:203-210 (1999). |
Mendelman, P. M. et al., “Aminoglycoside penetration, inactivation, and efficacy in cystic fibrosis sputum,” American Review of Respiratory Disease, 132(4):761-765 (1985). |
Mohanty, B. et al., “Systematic of alcohol-induced simple coacervation in aqueous gelatin solutions,” Biomacromolecules, 4:1080-1086 (2003). |
Morgan, J. R. et al., “Preparation and properties of liposome-associated gentamicin,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 17(4):544-548 (1980). |
Myers, M. A. et al., “Pulmonary effects of chronic exposure to liposome aerosols in mice,” Experimental Lung Research, 19:1-19 (1993). |
Nasu, M. et al., “Appropriate use of antimicrobial agents,” Selection of Anti-infective, Clinic in Japan (Special Number) Infection Disease Study in New Era (first volume), 2003, 61st issue, pp. 718-723. |
Newton, D. W. et al., Chapter 4: “Coacervation: Principles and Applications,” In: Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery, Tarcha, P. J. (ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 67-81 (1991). |
Nightingale, S. D. et al., “Liposome-encapsulated gentamicin treatment of Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare complex bacteremia in AIDS patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 37(9) 1869-1872 (1993). |
Niven, R. W. et al., “Nebulization of liposomes. I. Effects of lipid composition,” Pharmaceutical Research, 7(11):1127-1133 (1990). |
Niven, R. W. et al., “Nebulization of liposomes. II. The effects of size and modeling of solute release profiles,” Pharmaceutical Research, 8(2):217-221 (1991). |
Niven, R. W. et al., “Nebulization of liposomes. III. The effects of operating conditions and local environment,” Pharmaceutical Research, 9(4):515-520 (1992). |
Omri, A. et al., “Incorporation, release and in-vitro antibacterial activity of liposomal aminoglycosides against Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 36:631-639 (1995). |
Omri, A. et al., “Comparison of the Bactericidal Action of Amikacin, Netilmicin and Tobramtcin in Free and Liposomal Formulation against Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Chemotherapy, 42:170-176 (1996). |
Omri, A. et al., “Pulmonary retention of free and liposome-encapsulated tobramycin after intratracheal administration in uninfected rats and rats infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 38(5):1090-1095 (1994). |
Pai, V. B. et al., “Efficacy and safety of aerosolized tobramycin in cystic fibrosis,” Pediatric Pulmonology, 32(4):314-327 (2001). |
Parsek, M. R. et al., “Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing gram-negative bacteria: a signaling mechanism involved in associations with higher organisms,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 97(16):6789-6793 (2000). |
Patton, J. S. et al., “The lungs as a portal of entry for systemic drug delivery,” Proc. Am. Thor. Soc., 1:338-344 (2004). |
Petersen, E. A. et al., “Liposomal amikacin: improved treatment of Mycibacterium avium complex infection in the beige mouse model,” Journal Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 38:819-828 (1996). |
Petkowicz, J. et al., “Hypoglycemic Effect of Liposome-Entrapped Insulin Administered by Various Routes into Normal Rats,” Pol. J. Pharmacal. Pharrn., 41:299-304 (1989). |
Pilewski, J. M. et al., “Role of CFTR in airway disease,” Physiological Reviews, 79(1):5215-5255 (1999). |
Poyner, E. A. et al., “A comparative study on the pulmonary delivery of tobramycin encapsulated into liposomes and PLA microspheres following intravenous and endotracheal delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, 35(1):41-48 (1995). |
Poyner, E. A. et al., “Preparation, properties and the effects of free and liposomal tobramycin on siderophore production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 34:43-52 (1993). |
Price, C. I. et al., “Liposome delivery of aminoglycosides in burn wounds,” Surgery, Gynecolooy & Obstetrics, 174:414-418 (1992). |
Price, C. I. et al., “Liposome encapsulation: a method for enhancing the effectiveness of local antibiotics,” Surgery, 115(4):480-487 (1994). |
Price, C. I. et al., “Enhanced effectiveness of intraperitoneal antibiotics administered via liposomal carrier,” Arch Surgery, 124:1411-1415 (1989). |
Price, K. E. et al., “Amikacin, an aminoglycoside with marked activity against antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 134:S249-S261 (1976). |
Ramsammy, L. S. et al., “The effect of gentamicin on the biophysical properties of phosphatidic acid liposomes is influenced by the O-C=O group of the lipid,” Biochemistry, 27:8249-8254 (1988). |
Ramsey, B. W. et al., “Intermittent administration of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis Inhaled Tobramycin Study Group,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 340(1):23-30 (1999). |
Ramsey, B. W. et al., “Efficacy of aerosolized tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 328:1740-1746 (1993). |
Roehrborn, A. A. et al., “Lipid-based slow-release formulation of amikacin sulfate reduces foreign body-associated infections in mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 39(8):1752-1755 (1995). |
Sabra, W. et al., “Physiological responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 to oxidative stress in controlled microaerobic and aerobic cultures,” Microbiology, 148:3195-3202 (2002). |
Schentag, J. J., Antimicrobial action and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics: the use of AUIC to improve efficacy and avoid resistance, Journal of Chemotherapy, 11(6):426-439 (1999). |
Schiffelers, R. M. et al., “Therapeutic efficacy of liposomal gentamicin in clinically relevant rat models,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 214:103-105 (2001). |
Schiffelers, R. M. et al., “In vivo synergistic interaction of liposomecoencapsulated gentamicin and ceftazidime,” Journal Pharmacology Experimental Therapeutics, 298(1):369-375 (2001). |
Schreier, H. et al., “Pulmonary delivery of amikacin liposomes and acute liposome toxicity in the sheep,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 87(1-3):183-193 (1992). |
Schreier, H. et al., “Pulmonary delivery of liposomes,” Journal of Controlled Release, 24(1):209-223 (1993). |
Stott, P. W. et al., “Characterization of complex coacervates of some tricyclic antidepressants and evaluation of their potential for enhancing transdermal flux,” Journal of Controlled Release, 41(3):215-227 (1996). |
Sermet-Gaudelus, I. et al., “Nebulized antibiotics in cystic fibrosis,” Paediatric Drugs, 4(7):455-467 (2002). |
Shah, S. P. et al., “Liposomal amikacin dry powder inhaler: effect of fines on in vitro performance,” AAPS PharmSciTech, 5(4):e65:1-7 (2004). |
Singh, P. K. et al., “Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms,” Nature, 407:762-764 (2000). |
Skubitz, K. M. et al., “Inhalational interleukin-2 liposomes for pulmonary metastases: a phase I clinical trial,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, 11(7): 555-563 (2000). |
Swenson, K. A. et al., “Pharmacokinetics and in vivo activity of liposome-encapsulated gentamicin,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 34(2)235-240 (1990). |
Swenson, C. E. et al., “Liposomal aminoglycosides and TLC G-65,” Aids Patient Care, pp. 290-296 (1991). |
Szoka, F. Jr. et al., “Comparative properties and methods of preparation of lipid vesicles (liposomes),” Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 9:467-508 (1980). |
Taylor, K. M. G. et al., “The influence of liposomal encapsulation on sodium cromoglycate pharmacokinetics in man,” Pharmaceutical Research, 6(7):633-636 (1989). |
Ten, R. M. et al., “Interleukin-2 liposomes for primary immune deficiency using the aerosol route,” International Immunopharmacology, 2(2-3):333-344 (2002). |
Thomas, D. A. et al., “Acute effects of liposome aerosol inhalation on pulmonary function in healthy human volunteers,” Chest, 99(5):1268-1270 (1991). |
Thomasin, C. et al., “Drug microencapsulation by PLA/PLGA coacervation in the light of thermodynamics. 2. Parameters determining microsphere formation,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 87(3):269-275 (1998). |
Trafny, E. A. et al., “Effects of free and liposome-encapsulated antibiotics on adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to collagen type I,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 39(12):2645-2649 (1995). |
Vecellio, L., “The mesh nebuliser: a recent technical innovation for aerosol delivery,” Breathe, 2(3):253-260 (2006). |
Veldhuizen, R. et al., “The role of lipids in pulmonary surfactant,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1408:90-108 (1998). |
Vidgren, M. et al., “A study of 99m technetium-labelled beclomethasone dipropionate dilauroylphosphatidylcholine liposome aerosol in normal volunteers,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 115:209-216 (1995). |
Vitas, A. I. et al., “Effect of composition and method of preparation of liposomes on their stability and interaction with murine monocytes infected with Brucella abortus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 40(11:146-151 (1996). |
Westerman, E. M. et al., “Effect of nebulized colistin sulphate and colistin sulphomethate on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study,” Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 3(1):23-28 (2004). |
Whitehead, T. C. et al., “Kinetics and Toxicity of Liposomal and Conventional Amikacin in a Patient with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis,” Eur J Clin Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 17:794-797 (1998). |
Wichert, B. V. et al., “Amikacin liposomes: characterization, aerosolization, and in vitro activity against Mycobacterium avium—intracellulare in alveolar macrophages,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 78(23):227-235 (1992). |
Wolff, R. K. et al., “Toxicologic testing of inhaled pharmaceutical aerosols,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 23(4):343-369 (1993). |
Worlitzsch, D. et al., “Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients,” J. Clin. Invest., 109:317-325 (2002). |
Xiu, L. et al., “Drug Resistant Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patients with Mechanical Ventilation,” Med. J. Chin. PLA, 27(6):544-545 (2002). |
Yanagihara, K. et al., “Design of anti-bacterial drug and anti-Mycobacterial drug for drug delivery system,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, 8:475-482 (2002). |
Zeng, S. et al., “Intravitreal Pharmacokinetics of Liposome-encapsulated Amikacin in a Rabbit Model,” Opthamology, 100:1640-1644 (1993). |
Zhang, J. H. et al., “A Novel Method to Prepare Liposomes Containing Amikacin,” Journal Microencapsulation, 16(4):511-516 (1999). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/748,756, mailed Jan. 27, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/598,830, mailed Oct. 23, 2012. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 201102419-7, mailed Sep. 7, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,246, mailed Jan. 10, 2013. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 168279, dated Aug. 1, 2012. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200680034397.X, dated May 27, 2012. |
Office Action for Columbian Application No. 08016117, dated Jun. 26, 2012. |
Office Action for European Application No. 06787716.7, dated Oct. 26, 2012. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2009-504281, dated Sep. 4, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/748,756, mailed Aug. 23, 2012. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2009-504301, dated Sep. 4, 2012. |
Ishii, F. et al., “Procedure for Preparation of Lipid Vesicles (Liposomes) Using the Coacervation (Phase Separation) Technique,” Langmuir, 11(2):483-486 (1995). |
Supplementary European Search Report and Written Opinion for European Application No. 07754936, mailed Jan. 18, 2013. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980140740.2, dated Jun. 4, 2013. |
Office Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 592217, mailed Feb. 5, 2013. |
First Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 606383, dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
Office Action for Indian Patent Application No. 2219/DELNP/2005, dated Jan. 3, 2007. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2005-7007679, dated Dec. 26, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2003/034240, mailed May 6, 2013. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-001318, mailed Feb. 12, 2013. |
Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/000195, mailed Oct. 2, 2012. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,614,764, dated Nov. 14, 2012. |
Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680034397.X, dated Dec. 4, 2012. |
Office Action for Columbian Patent Application No. 08016117, dated Jan. 14, 2013. |
Office Action for Costa Rican Patent Application No. 9736, dated Apr. 22, 2013. |
Office Action for Israel Patent Application No. 188406, dated Jan. 6, 2013. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2008-7002031, dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,646,255, dated Feb. 4, 2013. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 07754853, mailed Jan. 16, 2013. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,631,872, dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 06847502, mailed Dec. 5, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,213, mailed Mar. 11, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/664,181, mailed Feb. 12, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/675,559, mailed Mar. 19, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/675,587, mailed Apr. 4, 2013. |
Clay. M. M. et al., “Assessment of jet nebulisers for lung aerosol therapy,” Lancet, 2:592-594 (1983). |
Deamer, D. W. et al., “Liposome Preparation: Methods and Mechanisms,” Chapter 1 in: Liposomes, Ostro, M. J. (ed.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1983), 27 pages. |
Hess, D. et al., “Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand,” Chest, 110:498-505 (1996). |
Hess, D. R., “Nebulizers: Principles and Performance,” Respiratory Care, 45(6):609-622 (2000). |
Wang, W. et al., “Research progress in pulmonary administration of liposome,” Journal of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 17(3):226-229 (2000). |
Bangham, A. D. et al., “Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids,” J. Mol. Biol., 13:238-252 (1965). |
Papahadjopoulos, D. et al., “Phospholipid model membrames. I. Structrual characteristics of hydrated liquid crystals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta., 135:624-638 (1967). |
Bilodeau, M. et al.,“Kanamycin aerosol therapy in 200 cases of bronchopulmonary suppurations,” Can. Med. Assoc. J., 89:537-541 (1963) (with English Abstract). |
Chan, C. H. S. et al., “Mycobacteria as a cause of infective exacerbation in bronchiectasis,” Postgrad. Med. J., 68:896-899 (1992). |
Colardyn, F., “The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection,” Journal of Chemotherapy, 7(2):129-135 (1995). |
Coleman, L. T. et al., “Bronchiectasis in children,” Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 10(4)268-279 (1995). |
Cremades, M. J. et al., “Repeated pulmonary infection by Nocardia asteroides complex in a patient with bronchiectasis,” Respiration, 65:211-213 (1998). |
Crowther, N. R. et al., “Inhaled aminoglycoside (gentamicin) in bronchiectasis: Dry powder vs. nebulization vs. intravenous therapy,” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and Participating Societies, Toronto, Canada, Abstract 530 (Sep. 24-27, 1998). |
Currie, D. C., “Nebulisers for bronchiectasis,” Thorax, 52(Suppl. 2):S72-S74 (1997). |
Dally, M. B. et al., “Ventilatory effects of aerosol gentamicin,” Thorax, 33:54-56 (1978). |
Dickie, K. J. et al., “Ventilatory effects of aerosolized kanamycin and polymyxin,” Chest, 63(5):694-697 (1973). |
El-Din, M. A. T. et al., “Nebulizer therapy with antibiotics in chronic suppurative lung disease,” Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 7(4):345-350 (1994). |
Eller, J. M. et al., “The therapy of bronchiectasis,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 118(44):1608-1610 (1993). |
Farber, J. E. et al., “The use of aerosol penicillin and streptomycin in bronchopulmonary infections,” California Medicine, 73(3):214-217 (1950). |
Finke, W., “Long-term antibiotic therapy in chronic bronchitis and infectious asthma. Control and prevention of bronchopulmonary disease.” Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, 4(3):319-329 (1954). |
Garcia, A. T., “Efficacy of amikacin sulfate in lower respiratory infections,” Investigacion Medica Internacional, 9(3):235-240 (1982) (with English Abstract). |
Goldman, J. M. et al., “Inhaled micronised gentamicin poweder: a new delivery system,” Thorax, 45:939-940 (1990). |
Graczyk, J. et al., “Staphylococcal pneumonia—analysis of material of patients treated in lung diseases hospital in years 1981-1994,” Pneumonologia I Alergologia Polska, 65(11-12):767-774 (1997) (with English Abstract). |
Greene, K. E. et al., “Radiographic changes in acute exacerbations of cystic fibrosis in adults: A pilot study,” AJR, 163:557-562 (1994). |
Helbich, T. et al., “High-resolution computed tomography of the lung in young patients with cystic fibrosis,” Radiologe, 33(3):142-146 (1993) (English Abstract). |
Hewitt, W. L. et al., “Antibiotic therapy of abscess of the lung and bronchiectasis,” California Medicine, 76(5):319-324 (1952). |
Hubble, D., “Discussion on respiratory catarrh in children,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 52(9):701-710 (1959). |
Ikemoto, H. et al., “Susceptibility of bacteria isolated from the patients with lower respiratory tract infections to antibiotics,” The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 42(11):2350-2353 (1989). |
Ip, M. S. M. et al., “Bronchiectasis and related disorders,” Respirology, 1:107-114 (1996). |
Knox, K. et al., “Chronic bronchitis. An attempt to control chronic infection with Haemophilus influenzae by aerosol therapy,” The Lancet, pp. 120-122 (1955). |
Lin, H.-C. et al., “Inhaled gentamicin reduces airway neutrophil activity and mucus secretion in bronchiectasis,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 155:2024-2029 (1997). |
Marcotte, G. V. et al., “Chronic productive cough and bronchiectasis in a 40-year-old woman,” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 78(6):559-564 (1997). |
Mariotti, A. B. et al., “Aerosol therapy with tobramycin in exacerbations of chronic obstructive lung disease (7 cases),” 66(2):198-202 (1996) (with English Abstract). |
Marwah, O. S. et al., “Bronchiectasis. How to identify, treat and prevent,” Postgrad. Med., 97(2):149-150, 153-156, 159 (1995) (Abstract). |
Mombelli, G. et al., “Anti-pseudomonas activity in bronchial secretions of patients receiving amikacin or tobramycin as a continuous infusion,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 19(1):72-75 (1981). |
Nakazawa, S. et al., “Studies on a new aminoglycoside antibiotic, amikacin (BB-K8) in pediatrics,” The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 27(4):438-445 (1974). |
Oizumi, K. et al., “Therapeutic effect of amikacin for infections with gram-negative bacilli, especially for stubborn respiratory infections,” The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 31(1):15-23 (1978). |
Olsen, A. M., “Streptomycin aerosol in the treatment of chronic bronchiectasis: preliminary report,” Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic, pp. 53-54 (1946). |
Olsen, A. M., “Nebulization therapy in bronchiectasis: The use of penicillin and streptomycin aerosols,” in: Collected Papers of The Mayo Clinic and The Mayo Foundation, Hewitt, R. M. et al. (eds.), 38:579-586 (1946). |
Olsen, A. M., “Nebulization therapy in bronchiectasis: The use of penicillin and streptomycin aerosols,” J.A.M.A., 134(11):947-953 (1947). |
Paradisi, F. et al, “Acute and chronic bronchopulmonary infections and aminoglycoside antibiotics,” Chemioterapia Antimicrobica, 1(2):224-227 (1978). |
Pines, A. et al., “Treatment of severe Pseudomonas infections of the bronchi,” British Medical Journal, 1:663665 (1970). |
Pines, A. et al., “Gentamicin and colistin in chronic purulent bronchial infections,” British Medical Journal, 2:543-545 (1967). |
Potter, B. P., “Aerosol antibiotic therapy in suppurative diseases of the lung and bronchi,” Aerosol Antibiotic Therapy, 25:436-448 (1949). |
Shima, K. et al., “A study of amikacin (BB-K8) on the clinical effects on the respiratory infection,” Chemotherapy, 23(6):2128-2130 (1975) (with English Abstract). |
Smith, A. L. et al., “Safety of aerosol tobramycin administration for 3 months to patients with cystic fibrosis,” Pediatric Pulmonology, 7:265-271 (1989). |
Takamoto, M. et al., “Imipenem/cilastatin sodium alone or combined with amikacin sulfate in respiratory infections,” The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 47(9):1131-1144 (1994) (with English Abstract). |
Terzano, C. et al., “Tobramycin aerosol: could the delivery system influence the particle size and deposition in the lower airways?” Recenti. Prog. Med., 89(5):245-249 (1998) (English Abstract). |
Van Der Straeten, M. et al., “Amikacin in the treatment of gram-negative bronchopulmonary infections,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 134:S391-S393 (1976). |
Zlatanov, Zi. et al., “Gentamycin-pharmachim. Aerosol inhalation treatment of patients with chronic bronchitis,” Medico Biologic Information 2, pp. 5-8 (1976). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/664,181, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/675,559, mailed Aug. 20, 2013, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/675,587, mailed Aug. 21, 2013, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130064883 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60748468 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13527213 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13666420 | US | |
Parent | 11634343 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 13527213 | US |