This disclosure relates generally to the field of hydrocarbon recovery, refinement, and/or reservoir management operations to enable production of subsurface hydrocarbons. Specifically, exemplary embodiments relate to methods and apparatus for liquefaction of production gas during liquefied natural gas (LNG) generation.
This section is intended to introduce various aspects of the art, which may be associated with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. This discussion is believed to assist in providing a framework to facilitate a better understanding of particular aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that this section should be read in this light, and not necessarily as admissions of prior art.
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas (predominantly methane, CH4, with some mixture of heavier hydrocarbons, such as ethane, propane, and butanes, and possibly nonhydrocarbon contaminants, such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and water) that has been cooled to liquid form for ease and safety of storage and/or transport. Gas produced from hydrocarbon deposits may contain a wide range of hydrocarbon products (with a range of boiling points), “acidic” elements, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2), together with oil, mud, water, and mercury. The range of species within the gas is generally increased for gas which is co-produced with oil or hydrocarbon condensate. Such co-produced gas is commonly referred to as “associated gas.” Associated gas is normally pre-treated to remove impurities (e.g., dust, acid gases, helium, water, and heavy hydrocarbons) and thereby generate a clean, sweetened stream of gas. The natural gas can be condensed into a liquid at close to ambient pressure by cooling the natural gas to approximately −162° C. Often, minimal processing and/or pre-treatment occurs at the well site, due at least in part to the complexities of installing and/or maintaining complex gas cleaning and refrigeration systems at remote locations, especially for small systems (e.g., <50 million standard cubic feet per day).
Conventional pre-treatment systems are large, power-intensive, and expensive. Conventional pre-treatment systems cannot be transported to remote production operations, but rather the associated gas must be transported from a well site to a refinement site for pre-treatment. Transportation of associated gas away from a well site (e.g., via pipelines) is not always practical and/or economic. Rather than transporting such gas to market or beneficially combusting the gas (e.g., for power generation), such gas may be flared. Flaring, although historically widely practiced, has been restricted in certain areas due to increased concern of lost resources and of environmental impact (e.g., CO2 generation in the flared combustion gas). An alternative to flaring is to generate and store LNG on-site. However, the economics of small-scale LNG generation is generally marginal at best, especially if the associated gas has significant contamination from CO2.
More efficient equipment and techniques to generate LNG from production gas would be beneficial, especially from associated gas which is contaminated with CO2.
Methods and apparatus for liquefying a feed gas stream comprising natural gas and carbon dioxide are discussed. In one or more embodiments disclosed herein, a method includes compressing an input fluid stream to generate a first intermediary fluid stream; cooling the first intermediary fluid stream with a first heat exchanger to generate a second intermediary fluid stream, wherein a temperature of the second intermediary fluid stream is higher than a carbon dioxide-freezing temperature for the second intermediary fluid stream; expanding the second intermediary fluid stream to generate a third intermediary fluid stream, wherein the third intermediary fluid stream comprises solid carbon dioxide; separating the third intermediary fluid stream into a fourth intermediary fluid stream and an output fluid stream, wherein the output fluid stream comprises a LNG liquid; and utilizing the fourth intermediary fluid stream as a cooling fluid stream for the first heat exchanger.
In one or more embodiments disclosed herein, a method includes: producing associated gas at a liquid hydrocarbon-producing well site; generating an LNG slurry at the well site from the associated gas, wherein generating the LNG slurry comprises: compressing an input fluid stream of the associated gas to generate a first intermediary fluid stream; cooling the first intermediary fluid stream with a first heat exchanger to generate a second intermediary fluid stream, wherein a temperature of the second intermediary fluid stream is higher than a carbon dioxide freezing temperature for the second intermediary fluid stream; expanding the second intermediary fluid stream to generate a third intermediary fluid stream, wherein the third intermediary fluid stream comprises solid carbon dioxide; and separating the LNG slurry from the third intermediary fluid stream; and transporting the LNG slurry away from the well site.
In one or more embodiments disclosed herein, a method includes: dehydrating the feed gas stream to generate a dehydrated feed gas stream; compressing the dehydrated feed gas stream to generate a compressed feed gas stream; cooling the compressed feed gas stream in a first heat exchanger to generate a first cooled feed gas stream, wherein: the first heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the compressed feed gas stream; a separated vapor stream;
a high-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream; and a low-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream, the low-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream is formed in a closed refrigerant loop by reducing a pressure of the high-pressure, mixed refrigerant stream, and cooling the compressed feed gas stream results in formation of no frozen carbon dioxide in the first heat exchanger; cooling the first cooled feed gas stream in a second heat exchanger to generate a second cooled feed gas stream, wherein: the second heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the second cooled feed gas stream; and the separated vapor stream, and cooling the first cooled feed gas stream results in formation of no frozen carbon dioxide in the second heat exchanger; throttling the second cooled feed gas stream to form a partially-liquefied feed gas stream; separating the partially-liquefied feed gas stream to form: the separated vapor stream; and a slurry of condensed feed gas and frozen carbon dioxide; and burning at least a portion of the separated vapor stream after it exits the first heat exchanger.
In one or more embodiments disclosed herein, a method includes: dehydrating the feed gas stream to generate a dehydrated feed gas stream; compressing the dehydrated feed gas stream to generate a compressed feed gas stream; cooling the compressed feed gas stream in a first heat exchanger to generate a first cooled feed gas stream, wherein: the first heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the compressed feed gas stream; a high-pressure, separated vapor stream; a high-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream; and a low-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream, the low-pressure, single mixed refrigerant stream is formed in a closed refrigerant loop by reducing a pressure of the high-pressure, mixed refrigerant stream, and cooling the compressed feed gas stream results in formation of no frozen carbon dioxide in the first heat exchanger; cooling the first cooled feed gas stream in a second heat exchanger to generate a second cooled feed gas stream, wherein: the second heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the second cooled feed gas stream; the high-pressure, separated vapor stream; and a low pressure, separated vapor stream, and cooling the first cooled feed gas stream results in formation of no frozen carbon dioxide in the second heat exchanger;
In one or more embodiments disclosed herein, a method includes: dehydrating the feed gas stream to generate a dehydrated feed gas stream; compressing the dehydrated feed gas stream to generate a compressed feed gas stream; cooling the compressed feed gas stream in a first heat exchanger to generate a first cooled feed gas stream, wherein: the first heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the compressed feed gas stream; a high-pressure, nitrogen coolant stream; and a low-pressure, nitrogen coolant stream, and cooling the compressed feed gas stream results in formation of no frozen carbon dioxide in the first heat exchanger; expanding the high-pressure, nitrogen coolant stream through a turboexpander to form the low-pressure, nitrogen coolant stream and to generate a first unit of power, wherein at least portion of the first unit of power is utilized during the compressing the dehydrated feed gas stream; throttling the first cooled feed gas stream to form a first partially-liquefied feed gas stream; separating the first partially-liquefied feed gas stream to form: a low-pressure, separated vapor stream; and a first slurry of condensed feed gas and frozen carbon dioxide; compressing the low-pressure, separated vapor stream to form a high-pressure, separated vapor stream; cooling the high-pressure, separated vapor stream in a second heat exchanger to generate a liquefied feed gas stream, wherein: the second heat exchanger comprises a plurality of fluid streams, including: the high-pressure, separated vapor stream; and a pressurized liquid nitrogen stream, upon exiting the second heat exchanger, the pressurized liquid nitrogen stream becomes the high-pressure, nitrogen coolant stream, and the pressurized liquid nitrogen stream is formed by: transporting liquid nitrogen to the site; and compressing the transported liquid nitrogen; combining the liquefied feed gas stream with the first slurry to form a combined, liquefied feed gas stream; throttling the combined, liquefied feed gas stream to form a second partially-liquefied feed gas stream; and separating the second partially-liquefied feed gas stream to form: an output vapor stream; and an output slurry of condensed feed gas and frozen carbon dioxide.
So that the manner in which the recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments and applications.
It is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to particular devices or methods, which may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include singular and plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Furthermore, the words “can” and “may” are used throughout this application in a permissive sense (i.e., having the potential to, being able to), not in a mandatory sense (i.e., must). The term “include,” and derivations thereof, mean “including, but not limited to.” The term “coupled” means directly or indirectly connected. The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any aspect described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects. The term “uniform” means substantially equal for each sub-element, within about ±10% variation.
The term “real time” generally refers to the time delay resulting from detecting, sensing, collecting, filtering, amplifying, modulating, processing, and/or transmitting relevant data or attributes from one point (e.g., an event detection/sensing location) to another (e.g., a data monitoring location). In some situations, a time delay from detection of a physical event to observance of the data representing the physical event is insignificant or imperceptible, such that real time approximates instantaneous action. Real time may also refer to longer time delays that are still short enough to allow timely use of the data to monitor, control, adjust, or otherwise impact subsequent detections of such physical events.
As used herein, a “well site” is an onshore or offshore location where at least one well connects a subsurface reservoir (e.g., containing fluids) to the surface, and the region around the well(s), including any associated physical pad or structure (e.g., foundation) to support activities and equipment directly related to the operation of the well(s). The size of a well site is typically ½ to 2 acres, but may be larger depending on the number of wells at the site (e.g., sharing equipment), vehicle access issues, and safety concerns about placing equipment close together. Large well sites may be 3 or even 5 acres in size.
If there is any conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this specification should be adopted for the purposes of understanding this disclosure.
One of the many potential advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure is improved efficiency in the generation of LNG from production gas by reducing or eliminating pre-treatment processes (e.g., removal of natural gas liquids and/or solid-forming species, especially CO2). Other potential advantages include one or more of the following, among others that will be apparent to the skilled artisan with the benefit of this disclosure: gas handling costs may be reduced; gas handling costs may be significantly reduced for associated gas; gas handling procedures may be simplified at areas without ready access to pipelines; flaring procedures may be reduced or eliminated, especially for small developments, by enabling transportation of LNG liquid and/or LNG slurry away from the well site (e.g., via trucking, rail, and/or ships). In some embodiments, potential advantages include (at least partial) liquefaction of natural gas at or near a well site, thereby reducing transportation costs. Embodiments of the present disclosure can thereby be useful in the processing of hydrocarbons from subsurface formations or treating of combustion flue gases to capture and reduce CO2 emissions.
Methods and apparatus for LNG generation disclosed herein utilize one or more heat exchangers. Commonly, a heat exchanger transfers heat from a higher-temperature fluid (e.g., a process fluid) to a lower-temperature fluid (e.g., a cooling fluid), thereby reducing the temperature of the higher-temperature fluid and/or raising the temperature of the cooling fluid. Heat exchangers may utilize multiple fluid streams, with the temperature of any one fluid stream being affected by the temperatures of each of the other fluid streams. At times, reduction in temperature of a fluid stream by the action of the heat exchanger will result in freezing, solidifying, and/or precipitation of one or more components of the process fluid stream. In some embodiments, a heat exchanger may be selected with features that facilitate removal of such frozen components.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, input fluid stream 101 is generated from a production gas feed by separating out liquid-forming species (e.g., C6+ components) via conventional methods (e.g., in an oil-gas or oil-gas-water separator to form a liquid phase that is primarily stable at ambient conditions). The gas feed may be then dehydrated (e.g., dehydration with mild cooling under pressure, glycol contacting, molecular sieves, and/or solid adsorbents) to reduce the water content. For example, the water content may be sufficiently reduced such that water-ice or hydrates will not form when the gas stream is transferred to one or more subsequent heat exchangers (e.g., heat exchangers utilized in any method of LNG generation according to embodiments disclosed herein).
In some embodiments, input fluid stream 101 is an associated gas that has been co-produced with oil or other hydrocarbons from a subsurface well. Associated gas tends to be rich in C2+ components, since the gas is in phase equilibrium with the oil. Whereas methane-rich natural gas (such as may occur in non-associated gas reservoirs) may have a specific gravity (relative to air) of about 0.60, associated gas tends to have a specific gravity in a range of about 0.70 to about 0.85. In some embodiments, input fluid stream 101 has a specific gravity greater or equal to about 0.75. It should be appreciated that the energy utilized to liquefy an associated gas that is rich in C2+ components may be considerably less than the energy utilized to liquefy a natural gas with little C2+ components.
In some embodiments, the reduction in temperature of the intermediary fluid stream in the heat exchanger 130 is controlled to mitigate formation of solids in the heat exchanger 130. It should be appreciated that solid formation may be of particular concern if a substantial concentration of CO2 is present in the intermediary fluid stream. For example, the temperature of the intermediary fluid stream in the heat exchanger 130 may be maintained in a range of from about −95° C. to about −120° C., or more specifically from about −100° C. to about −115° C. for CO2 concentrations of up to several mole percent.
As another example, method 200 may augment method 100 by the extraction of a fluid stream 203 (e.g., a primarily-gaseous fluid stream) produced at separation tank 160. As illustrated, fluid stream 203 may be used as a cooling fluid stream for heat exchanger 130 before being consumed at burner 270. For example, fluid stream 203 may exit separation tank 160 and/or enter heat exchanger 130 at a temperature of about −160° C. (at ambient pressure). It should be understood that fluid stream 203 may be significantly depleted of C2+ components, due at least in part, to the higher C2+ condensation temperatures than the methane condensation temperature. In some embodiments, burner 270 is a flaring device. In some embodiments, burner 270 utilizes fluid stream 203 as fuel, such as in a boiler or a combustion engine. In some embodiments, about 20 mass % to about 30 mass % of the input fluid stream 101 may be extracted in fluid stream 203, while about 70 mass % to about 80 mass % of the input fluid stream 101 may be extracted in fluid stream 102 (e.g., as a near-ambient pressure LNG liquid and/or a LNG slurry of LNG liquid and frozen CO2). Consequently, method 200 may be referred to as a “partial-liquefaction method.” Compared to conventional methods, partial-liquefaction methods may beneficially reduce the amount of gas being flared (e.g., about 75% liquefied, with about 25% flared), and/or may beneficially capture the majority of the valuable C2+ species of the input fluid stream 101. Consuming non-liquefied gas at burner 270 may be useful, for example, for (at least partial) liquefaction of natural gas at or near a well site. Compared to other methods discussed below, a partial-liquefaction method may provide a simplified process that does not utilize recompression of the non-liquefied gas. For example, for an input fluid stream having a specific gravity of about 0.8 and a CO2 concentration of about 2 mol %, an output fluid stream may contain liquefied LNG of about 75 mass % of the input fluid stream.
Partial-liquefaction methods as disclosed herein may convert an associated gas to LNG with reduced pre-treating. For example, pre-treating the associated gas may include dehydration, but the pre-treating may include no, or minimal, CO2 reduction. While the non-liquefied portion of the gas (e.g., fluid stream 203) may be flared, the non-liquefied gas may have minimal C2+ components, since those components strongly partition into the liquid phase at LNG temperatures (e.g., about −160° C. at atmospheric pressure). Since the non-liquefied gas is primarily methane (and any nitrogen in the gas), CO2 generation is minimized in the flare as compared to flaring an equal volume of a C2+ rich gas. Moreover, destruction of fuel value is also minimized since methane has the lowest energy-per-standard-volume of species solely composed of hydrogen and carbon. Furthermore, since liquefaction of methane is an extremely energy-intensive process (due to its low boiling point), purposely and selectively rejecting a portion of the methane significantly reduces the refrigeration power for liquefaction.
In some embodiments, method 200 may be further augmented to provide more efficient partial-liquefaction methods. For example, as illustrated in
As another example, method 200 may augment method 100 by the addition of a secondary throttle 252 and secondary separation tank 261. For example, if the reduction in pressure at throttle 150 results in an intermediary fluid stream at an elevated pressure (e.g., greater than ambient pressure), output fluid stream 102 may be further decompressed at throttle 252. A next processing step of method 200 may separate a primarily-liquid component (e.g., a LNG liquid and/or a LNG slurry of LNG liquid and frozen CO2) of the further-decompressed intermediary fluid stream at secondary separation tank 261, thereby producing as output fluid stream 204. An additional fluid stream 205 (e.g., a primarily-gaseous fluid stream) may be produced at secondary separation tank 261. Method 200 may include, for example, burning fluid stream 205 as a low-pressure flare and/or as fuel (e.g., at burner 270 or similar).
In some embodiments (e.g., as an alternative to secondary throttle 252 and secondary separation tank 261), a LNG slurry of LNG liquid and frozen CO2 (e.g., output fluid stream 102, output fluid stream 204) may be transported, rather than separated at the well site. Transporting a LNG slurry (e.g., an unseparated LNG slurry) may reduce the overall complexity of the system. The LNG slurry may be transported to a central processing plant for separation and/or CO2 capture. In some embodiments, the LNG slurry may be maintained at an elevated pressure during transportation. Not expanding the LNG slurry to ambient pressure before transporting may result in increased recovery of gas in liquid form (e.g., at the central processing plant), although at the added expense of pressurized storage and transport. Transporting a LNG slurry may be useful, for example, for (at least partial) liquefaction of natural gas at or near a well site.
In some embodiments, solid CO2 may be extracted from the LNG slurry prior to transporting. For example, LNG liquid may be drawn from a holding tank (e.g., separation tank 261), leaving solid CO2 residue, and/or the LNG slurry may be passed through filters (e.g., liquid & gas filters, strainers, fully automatic backflush filters, filter separators, coalescers, cyclones, carbon bed filters & cartridge filters). In some embodiments, extracted CO2 solids may be de-sublimed via heating and vented.
In some embodiments, a control system may be used to monitor and/or maintain temperatures and/or pressures of the various fluid streams. For example, a control system may monitor and/or maintain a pre-throttle temperature (e.g., any intermediary fluid stream prior to throttle 150) above, but close to, the CO2 freeze-out temperature (e.g., from about −120° C. to about −95° C.). Note that the CO2 freeze-out temperature may vary depending on the composition of input fluid stream 101. This may be particularly important for application to associated gas, since the flow rate and/or composition typically changes with time due to decreasing pressure in an oil-producing well. The pre-throttle temperature may be maintained to ensure CO2 freeze-out does not occur in the heat exchanger, possibly resulting in blockages thereof. Moreover, the pre-throttle temperature may be maintained with variation of the flow rate and/or composition of input fluid stream 101.
For example, a pressure measurement of intermediary fluid stream 2 may be indicated as P2. Pressure P2 may be monitored and used in combination with input fluid stream composition K1 (which may also be monitored) as input to a thermodynamic model. Over time, as composition K1 varies, the model may predict the onset of CO2 precipitation and/or provide a minimum-allowable intermediary fluid stream temperature T4 and/or temperature T5 to avoid CO2 precipitation within heat exchanger HX2 and/or heat exchanger HX3. The control system may adjust operating parameters for cooler HX1, heat exchanger HX2, and/or heat exchanger HX3 based on the model. A simple, “reduced order” model may be integrated in the control system to predict (e.g., continuously, periodically, or intermittently) the precipitation temperature at the given pressure.
As another example, the pressure drop (e.g., pressure P4−pressure P3) of heat exchanger HX2 may be monitored in combination with real-time flow rate data (e.g., flow rate Q3, flow rate Q4) to detect solid formation in the heat exchanger HX2. Similar measurements and calculations may be made for heat exchanger HX3. This may be in addition to, or in lieu of, the thermodynamic model to ensure detection and/or reduction of solids build-up in the heat exchangers.
As another example, the flow of intermediary fluid stream 8 may be monitored and/or controlled at three-way bypass valve V3. Since intermediary fluid stream 8 acts as a cooling fluid stream for heat exchanger HX3, controlling the fluid flow of intermediary fluid stream 8 through heat exchanger HX3 thereby provides control of temperature T5. Maintaining temperature T5 above CO2 freezing temperature may mitigate risk of solid build up in heat exchanger HX3.
As another example, the flow of refrigerant fluid stream 11 in mixed refrigerant loop 240 may be monitored and/or controlled at compressor C2. The compressor speed and/or inlet guide vanes may be used for suction-pressure control. Suction-pressure manipulation of compressor C2 may actively control temperature T11, the temperature of the refrigerant fluid stream 11 in heat exchanger HX2. Since refrigerant fluid stream 11 acts as a cooling fluid stream for heat exchanger HX2, controlling the suction pressure of compressor C2 controls the flow of refrigerant fluid stream 11 through heat exchanger HX2, and thereby provides control of temperature T4. Maintaining temperature T4 above CO2 freezing temperature may mitigate risk of solid build-up in heat exchanger HX2.
As another example, the flow of refrigerant fluid stream 11 may be monitored and/or controlled at refrigerant throttle valve Vla. Modulating the refrigerant throttle valve V1a may achieve a superheat temperature T12 in the refrigerant fluid stream 12, and may thereby optimize, or at least increase, refrigerant utilization. For example, by modulating the refrigerant throttle valve V1a to control the temperature T12, a selected amount of refrigerant may be evaporated during the cooling process in heat exchanger HX2. For a lower cooling specification, a reduced superheat temperature may be selected, and not all of the refrigerant may be evaporated. As a result, throttling of V1a may reduce flow of refrigerant fluid stream 11 to restore superheat temperatures of the refrigerant. This may ultimately result in reduced refrigerant flow in the compressor C2. This may also ultimately result in lower energy consumption of the refrigerant loop. This may also prevent damage to the compressor C2 due to liquid refrigerant.
As another example, temperature T5 may be at least partially controlled by varying a speed of compressor C1. For example, a flow rate Q1 of input fluid stream 1 may be monitored. A speed of compressor C1 may be varied in response to changes in the flow rate Q1 to maintain a desired temperature T5.
As another example, the composition K11 of the refrigerant fluid in mixed refrigerant loop 240 may be adjusted to affect cooling capacity for heat exchanger HX2. For example, a separation tank S2 may be utilized to separate liquid and solid components of the refrigerant fluid. When the refrigerant fluid partially liquefies, the heavier components preferentially condense in separation tank S2. A liquid-level control of separation tank S2 may be utilized to adjust the composition of the refrigerant fluid. Adjusting the composition may in turn affect the cooling capacity of the mixed refrigerant loop 240. This may allow for active control in response to change in production rates and/or flow rate Q1 of input fluid stream 1.
Further, pressure P2 may be actively controlled with compressor C1. For example, active control of pressure P2 may manipulate pressure P5 to affect the pressure drop across throttle valve V2 and, therefore, temperature T6. Thus, the temperature condition of the refrigeration system (e.g., mixed refrigerant loop 240 and heat exchanger HX2) to achieve a certain temperature T4 can be relaxed if a higher pressure P5 is attainable. Active control of pressure P5 can therefore be used to optimize, or at least enhance overall energy consumption of the liquefaction process. Active control of pressure P2 to a fixed set-point may also ensure consistent operation while inlet gas pressure P1 may vary.
In some embodiments, the control system may be operated on an ongoing basis. For example, an automated process may cause the measurements to be collected and/or the model(s) to be updated at regular intervals (e.g., hourly, several times per day, daily, etc.). In some embodiments, the control system may collect measurements and/or update model(s) with a certain frequency during standard operations, and the control system may collect measurements and/or update model(s) with a higher frequency during exceptional operations. For example, a trigger (e.g., a data threshold indicative of an unplanned occurrence) may switch the control system from standard-monitoring frequency (e.g., hourly, several times per day, daily, etc.) to exception-monitoring frequency (e.g., every second, every minute, every five minutes, every half hour, etc.). In some embodiments, a function of the control system under exceptional operations may be to preserve records (e.g., making backup copies of existing data, transmitting data to remote locations, creating duplicative data records, and/or storing existing records to avoid overwriting data). In some embodiments, the control system may collect measurements on an ad hoc basis. For example, an operator may request updated data, and the control system may collect one or more types of measurements in response to the request. As another example, a trigger (e.g., a data threshold indicative of an unplanned occurrence) may cause the control system to collect one or more measurements.
In some embodiments, the reduction in pressure at throttle 150 (in
Method 400-b includes a first procedure (e.g., method 100) to partially liquefy a production gas which has been dehydrated, but not treated to reduce CO2 content (e.g., input fluid stream 101). The partial liquefaction is performed by compressing the input fluid stream 101 at compressor 110, then cooling this compressed fluid stream through cooler 120 and heat exchanger 130 to a temperature T1. In some embodiments, temperature T1 is near to, but above, the freeze-out temperature for CO2 in the intermediary fluid stream. The heat exchanger 130 may include one or more cooling fluid streams (e.g., one or more mixed refrigerant loops). In some embodiments, the heat exchanger 130 may be designed or operated so that the various cooling fluid streams exit the heat exchanger at differing temperatures. Although unequal exit temperatures may complicate the heat exchanger design and/or operation, such cooling fluid streams may increase the overall efficiency of the system, especially when the intermediary fluid stream has a high CO2 composition (e.g., 5-10 mol % CO2). Note that when the intermediary fluid stream has a high CO2 composition, the temperature of the intermediary fluid stream may most likely be maintained considerably warmer than an otherwise-optimal refrigerant temperature or the temperature of the recompressed non-liquefied gas (e.g., fluid stream 406) to avoid solids accumulation. After cooling the intermediary fluid stream with heat exchanger 130, method 400-b expands the fluid stream at throttle 150 to further cool and partially liquefy the fluid stream, and to cause freeze-out of CO2. In some embodiments, the expansion at throttle 150 may be to near-ambient pressure (e.g., about 101 kPa to about 111 kPa). In some embodiments, the expansion at throttle 150 may be to an elevated pressure (e.g., about 150 kPa to about 250 kPa). Note that expansion to an elevated pressure may reduce the volumetric flow of the intermediary fluid stream through subsequent equipment, and thereby reduce the size and/or cost of the subsequent equipment. Method 400-b continues by separating a first primarily-liquid component (e.g., a LNG liquid and/or a LNG slurry of LNG liquid and frozen CO2) from non-liquefied gas at separation tank 160, forming output fluid stream 102.
Method 400-b also includes a second procedure to further extract LNG from the fluid stream. The non-liquefied gas from the partial-liquefaction procedure becomes fluid stream 406. Note that fluid stream 406 has reduced CO2 content (compared to input fluid stream 101) due to the freeze-out of CO2 during the partial-liquefaction procedure. Method 400-b continues by recompressing fluid stream 406 at secondary compressor 412. By supplying the cold fluid stream 406 directly to the secondary compressor 412, the size and power specifications of secondary compressor 412 may be reduced. A next, optional processing step of method 400-b reduces the temperature of the intermediary fluid stream at cooler 422. Method 400-b continues by re-cooling the intermediary fluid stream to temperature T2 at heat exchanger 130. In some embodiments, the illustrated heat exchanger 130 of
After separating a first primarily-liquid component (e.g., fluid stream 102) from a non-liquefied gas (e.g., fluid stream 406) at separation tank 160, method 400-c includes utilizing fluid stream 406 as a cooling fluid stream in secondary heat exchanger 432. Method 400-c continues by recompressing fluid stream 406 at secondary compressor 412. A next, optional processing step of method 400-c reduces the temperature of the intermediary fluid stream at cooler 422. Method 400-c continues by re-cooling the intermediary fluid stream at heat exchanger 130. Method 400-c continues by further cooling the intermediary fluid stream at secondary heat exchanger 432. Note that the non-liquefied gas of fluid stream 406 is used to further cool the recompressed vapor (i.e., autorefrigeration). The intermediary fluid stream is then expanded at throttle 453. Method 400-c continues by separating a second primarily-liquid component (e.g., a LNG liquid and/or a LNG slurry of LNG liquid and frozen CO2) at secondary separation tank 462, forming output fluid stream 407. In some embodiments, an additional fluid stream 408 (e.g., a primarily-gaseous fluid stream) may be produced at secondary separation tank 462. Method 400-c may include, for example, burning fluid stream 408 as a low-pressure flare and/or as fuel (e.g., at burner 270 or similar). For example, fluid stream 408 may serve as fuel for compressor 150 and/or compressor 453.
In some embodiments, a mixed refrigerant loop (e.g., mixed refrigerant loop 240 of
In some embodiments, as an alternate and/or a supplement to a mixed refrigerant loop (e.g., mixed refrigerant loop 240), an open refrigerant loop may be used to provide one or more cooling fluid streams to heat exchanger 130 and/or secondary heat exchanger 432. For example, a consumable cooling fluid (e.g., liquid air and/or liquid nitrogen) may be used as a refrigerant fluid in an open refrigerant loop. In some embodiments, consumable cooling fluid may be generated offsite and transported (e.g., via trucks, containers, or piping) to the site of the production gas liquefaction (e.g., at or near a well site) for use in an open refrigerant loop system (e.g., vented once thermal capacity of the consumable cooling fluid has been spent). Transported consumable cooling fluid may be useful, for example, for liquefaction of production gas at or near a well site. In some embodiments, to enable venting with low environmental impact, the consumable cooling fluid may be liquid nitrogen or liquid air.
The foregoing description is directed to particular example embodiments of the present technological advancement. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that many modifications and variations to the embodiments described herein are possible. All such modifications and variations are intended to be within the scope of the present disclosure, as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/984,458, filed Aug. 4, 2020, which claims the priority benefit of United States Provisional Patent Application No. 62/893,422, filed Aug. 29, 2019, entitled LIQUEFACTION OF PRODUCTION GAS, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1914337 | Belt | Jun 1933 | A |
1974145 | Atwell | Sep 1934 | A |
2007271 | Frankl | Jul 1935 | A |
2011550 | Hasche | Aug 1935 | A |
2321262 | Taylor | Jun 1943 | A |
2475255 | Rollman | Jul 1949 | A |
2537045 | Garbo | Jan 1951 | A |
2900797 | Kurata et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
2975604 | McMahon | Mar 1961 | A |
2986010 | Beckwith | May 1961 | A |
3014082 | Woertz, III | Dec 1961 | A |
3018632 | Keith | Jan 1962 | A |
3103427 | Jennings | Sep 1963 | A |
3180709 | Yendall et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3347055 | Blanchard et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3370435 | Arregger | Feb 1968 | A |
3376709 | Dickey et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3398544 | Crownover | Aug 1968 | A |
3400512 | McKay | Sep 1968 | A |
3400547 | Williams et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3511058 | Becker | May 1970 | A |
3724225 | Mancini et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3724226 | Pachaly | Apr 1973 | A |
3850001 | Locke | Nov 1974 | A |
3878689 | Grenci | Apr 1975 | A |
4281518 | Muller et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4415345 | Swallow | Nov 1983 | A |
4533372 | Valencia et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4576005 | Force | Mar 1986 | A |
4604115 | Bonneton et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4609388 | Adler et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4669277 | Goldstein | Jun 1987 | A |
4769054 | Steigman | Sep 1988 | A |
4923493 | Valencia et al. | May 1990 | A |
5025860 | Mandrin | Jun 1991 | A |
5062270 | Haut et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5120338 | Potts, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5137558 | Agrawal | Aug 1992 | A |
5139547 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141543 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5638698 | Knight et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5950453 | Bowen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6003603 | Breivik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053007 | Victory et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6082118 | Endrizzi | Jul 2000 | A |
6082133 | Barclay et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6158242 | Lu | Dec 2000 | A |
6237347 | Rigby et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6295838 | Shah et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298688 | Brostow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308531 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6412302 | Foglietta | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6662589 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6889522 | Prible et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7143606 | Trainer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7219512 | Wilding et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7278281 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7325415 | Amin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7386996 | Fredheim et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7520143 | Spilsbury | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7712331 | Dee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8079321 | Balasubramanian | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8435403 | Sapper et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8464289 | Pan | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8601833 | Dee et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616012 | Duerr et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616021 | Minta | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8747520 | Bearden et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9016088 | Butts | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9149761 | Northrop et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9339752 | Reddy et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9435229 | Alekseev et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9439077 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459042 | Chantant et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9995521 | Mogilevsky | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10294433 | Grainger et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10696360 | Balasubramanian | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20030196452 | Wilding | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040177646 | Wilkinson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060000615 | Choi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070277674 | Hirano et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080087421 | Kaminsky | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080302133 | Saysset et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090217701 | Minta et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100192626 | Chantant | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100251763 | Audun | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110036121 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110126451 | Pan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110259044 | Baudat et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120060553 | Bauer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120180657 | Monereau et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120285196 | Flinn et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130074541 | Kaminsky et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130199238 | Mock et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140130542 | Brown et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150153101 | Gahier | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150285553 | Oelfke et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170010041 | Pierre, Jr. et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170016667 | Huntington et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170016668 | Pierre, Jr. et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170167785 | Pierre, Jr. et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170167786 | Pierre, Jr. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170167787 | Pierre, Jr. et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170167788 | Pierre, Jr. et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180231303 | Pierre, Jr. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180231305 | Pierre, Jr. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180292128 | Degenstein et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200248871 | Kaminsky et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102620523 | Oct 2014 | CN |
102628635 | Oct 2014 | CN |
1960515 | May 1971 | DE |
2354726 | May 1975 | DE |
3149847 | Jul 1983 | DE |
3622145 | Jan 1988 | DE |
19906602 | Aug 2000 | DE |
102013007208 | Oct 2014 | DE |
1715267 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1972875 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2157013 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2629035 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2756368 | May 1998 | FR |
1376678 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1596330 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2172388 | Sep 1986 | GB |
2333148 | Jul 1999 | GB |
2470062 | Nov 2010 | GB |
2486036 | Nov 2012 | GB |
59216785 | Dec 1984 | JP |
H0861811 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2530859 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H1130458 | Feb 1999 | JP |
5705271 | Nov 2013 | JP |
5518531 | Jun 2014 | JP |
20100112708 | Oct 2010 | KR |
20110079949 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO2006120127 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2008133785 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2011101461 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2012031782 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012162690 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2014048845 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014203355 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO2015110443 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO2016060777 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO2017011123 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO2017067871 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2018025533 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bach, Wilfried (1990) “Offshore Natural Gas Liquefaction with Nitrogen Cooling—Process Design and Comparison of Coil-Wound and Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers,” Science and Technology Reports, No. 64, Jan. 1, 1990, pp. 31-37. |
Chang, Ho-Myung et al, (2019) “Thermodynamic Design of Methane Liquefaction System Based on Reversed-Brayton Cycle” Cryogenics, pp. 226-234. |
ConocoPhillips Liquefied Natural Gas Licensing (2017) “Our Technology and Expertise Are Ready to Work Toward Your LNG Future Today,” http://lnglicensing.conocophillips.com/Documents/15-1106%20LNG%20Brochure_March2016.pdf, Apr. 25, 2017, 5 pgs. |
Danish Technologies Institute (2017) “Project—Ice Bank System with Pulsating and Flexible Heat Exchanger (IPFLEX),” https://www.dti.dk/projects/project-ice-bank-system-with-pulsating-andflexible-heat-exchanger-ipflex/37176. |
Diocee, T. S. et al. (2004) “Atlantic LNG Train 4—The Worlds Largest LNG Train”, The 14th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG 14), Doha, Qatar, Mar. 21-24, 2004, 15 pgs. |
Khoo, C. T. et al. (2009) “Execution of LNG Mega Trains—The Qatargas 2 Experience,” WCG, 2009, 8 pages. |
Laforte, C. et al. (2009) “Tensile, Torsional and Bending Strain at the Adhesive Rupture of an Iced Substrate,” ASME 28th Int'l Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Eng., OMAE2009-79458, 8 pgs. |
McLachlan, Greg (2002) “Efficient Operation of LNG From the Oman LNG Project,” Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-8. |
Olsen, Lars et al. (2017). |
Ott, C. M. et al. (2015) “Large LNG Trains: Technology Advances to Address Market Challenges”, Gastech, Singapore, Oct. 27-30, 2015, 10 pgs. |
Publication No. 43031 (2000) Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB, Feb. 1, 2000, p. 239, XP000969014, ISSN: 0374-4353, paragraphs [0004], [0005] & [0006]. |
Publication No. 37752 (1995) Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB, Sep. 1, 1995, p. 632, XP000536225, ISSN: 0374-4353, 1 page. |
Ramshaw, Ian et al. (2009) “The Layout Challenges of Large Scale Floating LNG,” ConocoPhillips Global LNG Collaboration, 2009, 24 pgs, XP009144486. |
Riordan, Frank (1986) “A Deformable Heat Exchanger Separated by a Helicoid,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, v. 19.9, pp. 1505-1515. |
Roberts, M. J. et al. (2004) “Reducing LNG Capital Cost in Today's Competitive Environment”, PS2-6, The 14th International Conference and Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG 14), Doha, Qatar, Mar. 21-24, 2004, 12 pgs. |
Shah, Pankaj et al. (2013) “Refrigeration Compressor Driver Selection and Technology Qualification Enhances Value for the Wheatstone Project,” 17th Int'l Conf. & Exh. on LNG, 27 pgs. |
Tan, Hongbo et al. (2016) “Proposal and Design of a Natural Gas Liquefaction Process Recovering the Energy Obtained from the Pressure Reducing Stations of High-Pressure Pipelines,” Cryogenics, Elsevier, Kidlington, GB, v.80, Sep. 22, 2016, pp. 82-90. |
Tianbiao, He et al. (2015), Optimal Synthesis of Expansion Liquefaction Cycle for Distributed-Scale LNG, Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, pp. 268-280. |
Tsang, T. P. et al. (2009) “Application of Novel Compressor/Driver Configuration in the Optimized Cascade Process,” 2009 Spring Mtg. and Global Conf. on Process Safety—9th Topical Conf. on Gas Utilization, 2009, Abstract, 1 pg. https://www.aiche.org/conferences/aiche-spring-meeting-and-globalcongress-on-process-safety/2009/proceeding/paper/7a-application-novel-compressordriver-configurationoptimized-cascader-process. |
Japanese Office Action from corresponding Japanese Application No. 2021-539530 dated Jan. 30, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220128299 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62893422 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16984458 | Aug 2020 | US |
Child | 17647540 | US |