The present disclosure relates to liquefaction processes and systems as well as liquefaction process intermediate compositions. These systems and processes can be used in the form of hydrothermal liquefaction and they can be used to perform hydrothermal liquefaction on biomass solutions to create a bio-oil.
Bio-oils can be created from the hydrothermal liquefaction of a biomass slurry. These processes present many challenges for performing the process efficiently on many levels. One challenge is the pumping of biomass slurries through process systems, as well as the separation of the bio-oils from the reaction solutions. The present disclosure provides liquefaction process systems and intermediate compositions that overcome drawbacks of the prior art.
Liquefaction processes are provided that can include: providing a biomass slurry solution having a temperature of at least 300° C. at a pressure of at least 2000 psig; cooling the solution to a temperature of less than 150° C.; and depressurizing the solution to release carbon dioxide from the solution and form at least part of a bio-oil foam.
Liquefaction processes are also provided that can include: filtering the biomass slurry to remove particulates; and cooling and depressurizing the filtered solution to form a bio-oil foam.
Liquefaction systems are provided that can include: a heated biomass slurry reaction zone maintained above 300° C. and at least 2000 psig and in continuous fluid communication with a flash cooling/depressurization zone maintained below 150° C. and about atmospheric pressure.
Liquefaction systems are also provided that can include a flash depressurization zone maintained between about 125 psig and about atmospheric pressure in fluid communication with foam/liquid separation system.
Liquefaction process intermediate compositions are provided that can include a bio-oil foam phase separated from an aqueous biomass solids solution.
Embodiments of the disclosure are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings.
This disclosure is submitted in furtherance of the constitutional purposes of the U.S. Patent Laws “to promote the progress of science and useful arts” (Article 1, Section 8).
The process systems and intermediate compositions of the present disclosure will be described with reference to
Biomass sources suitable for use in this solution include but are not limited to agricultural residues (e.g., corn stover), forest residue (e.g., pine), industrial/municipal sludges, aquatic biomass sources (e.g., algae, kelp), high moisture biomass slurries, biosludge from wastewater treatment systems, sewage sludge from municipal treatment systems, wet biproducts from biorefinary operations, wet byproducts and residues from food processing, animal waste and waste from centralized animal raising facilities, organic chemical manufacturing wastewater streams, other organic contaminated industrial wastewaters. These biomass materials may be derived from, for example, organic materials, plants, algae, macroalgae, microalgae, photosynthetic cyanobacteria, animal waste, food processing wastes including, e.g., trimmings, culls, pomace, cooking water, washings, fermentation residuals, meat solid wastes, dairy liquid wastes, wood and other biomass materials, raw materials such as fruits, vegetables, fish, poultry, livestock, and combinations of these raw materials and others sources and feedstock materials including combinations of these various sources. Biomass slurry solution can be substantially liquid and have density of from 0.95 mg/ml to about 1.15 mg/ml. Wood oils are examples of liquid biomass slurry solutions and this liquid biomass may have a density within the 0.95 to 1.15 range.
The biomass slurry solution can have a minimum wt % of about 8 wt/wt % and can range up to as high as 35 wt/wt % with the balance being water. The balance can also include saltwater and/or mixtures of water and inorganics. The slurry solutions can be maintained at this concentration to allow efficient pumping of these solutions in a continuous or steady state reaction system as disclosed herein.
This biomass slurry solution can be provided to reaction zone 12, and within reaction zone 12, the biomass slurry solution can be increased to a temperature of at least 300° C. and a pressure of at least 2000 psig. According to example implementations, reaction zone 12 can also be configured to maintain the slurry from about 300° C. to about 350° C. and a pressure of from about 2000 psig to about 3000 psig. The biomass slurry solution can be processed at a liquid hourly space velocity in zone 12 from about 1 to about 10 L/L/h
From reaction zone 12, the reacted slurry solution can proceed to production zone 14. Production zone 14 can provide for the cooling, (which may be via heat exchange) of the reacted slurry solution to a temperature of less than 150° C. and/or the depressurizing of the solution to about atmospheric pressure. The reacted slurry solution can be cooled to below 110° C. as well. Upon depressurization, carbon dioxide can be released from the reacted slurry solution and form at least part of process intermediate 16 as a bio-oil foam. The bio-oil foam 17 that is formed resides above or is phase separated from the reacted aqueous solution 18 of the biomass slurry solution. The bio-oil foam composition 16 can be provided from production zone 14 as shown in
Referring next to
Referring next to
Cooling zone 32 can be in fluid communication with, for example, filter zone 20 of
It has been discovered that this bio-oil foam or froth resides above the aqueous solution at atmospheric pressure and provides intermediate composition 16 that can be exploited to separate the foam from the liquid solution, and thereby acquire the bio-oil produced during the reaction phase. This foam can be separated from the solution in a separation zone that can be coupled in fluid communication to the production zone.
Referring to
Referring next to
In fluid communication with reactor 64 can be an oil jacketed filter system 66 than can have an interior volume of about 670 ml. One side of this filter can be mixture and blow out pot assemblies 68 and 70. In fluid communication with the filter can be a heat exchanger outlet 72 which can be maintained at about 60° C. to 70° C. as described in this particular embodiment, but as indicated herein can be maintained at less than 150° C., or 110° C. or between 20° C. and 100° C.
In direct fluid communication with this heat exchanger outlet can be a bypass direct pressure let down conduit 78 which provides the reacted, filtered, and cooled solution to a separation zone. This bypass system 78 can bypass oil jacketed liquid collectors 76 with valve system 74, for example. Upon providing the cooled reacted solution to a separation zone which can include elements 80-88, the foam from the formed foam intermediate process composition can be separated utilizing a system that includes a back pressure regulator 80 that can be maintained at about 20° C. as well as a float trap 82 which can be in fluid communication with a container 84 configured to receive overfill from float trap 82. In fluid communication with float trap 82 can be sample collection assemblies 86 and 88, for example, which are also coupled to exhaust system 90.
Referring next to
As shown in
In compliance with the statute, embodiments of the invention have been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the entire invention is not limited to the specific features and/or embodiments shown and/or described, since the disclosed embodiments comprise forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract DE-ACO5-76RL01830 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4442006 | Ishida et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
20050113611 | Adams | May 2005 | A1 |
20110167713 | Quignard et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120055077 | Savage et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130206571 | Heilmann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102382683 | Mar 2012 | CN |
WO2011143380 | Nov 2011 | WO |
PCTUS2013041214 | Oct 2013 | WO |
PCTUS2013041214 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Elliott, D.C., et al., Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: Developments from batch to continuous process, Oct. 2014, Bioresource Technology, 178 (2015) pp. 147-156. |
Or, C., et al., Numerical Simulation of CO2 gas microbubbles of foamy oil, 2014, Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 7821-7829. |
Peterson, A.A, et al., Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sup- and supercritical water technologies, 2008, Energy Enviorn. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 32-65. |
Elliott, D.C., “Chemical Processing in High-Pressure Aqueous Environments. 7. Process Development for Catalytic Gasification of Wet Biomess Feedstocks”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (2004), 43, pp. 1999-2004. |
Elliott, D.C., et al., “Catalytic Hydrothermal Gasification of Lignin-Rich Biorefinery Residues and Algae”, Final Report, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830, PNNL-18944, (2009). |
Frank, E.D., et al. Life cycle comparison of hydrothermal liquefaction and lipid extraction pathways to renewable diesel from algae, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, vol. 18, Issue 1, (2012), 137-158. |
Haiduc, A.G., “SunCHem: an integrated process for the hydrothermal production of methane from microalgae and CO2 mitigation”, J. Appl. Phycol. (2009), 21, pp. 529-541. |
Toor, Saqib S., et al. “Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subscritical water technologies”, Energy, 36 (2011), pp. 2328-2342. |
Zhang, L., et al. Supercritical water gasification of an aqueous by-product from biomass hydrothermal liquefaction with novel Ru modified Ni catlaysts, Bioresource Technology, 102 (2011) 8279-8287. |