This invention relates to a process for the separation of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons or propane and heavier hydrocarbons from liquefied natural gas (hereinafter referred to as LNG) combined with the separation of a gas containing hydrocarbons to provide a volatile methane-rich gas stream and a less volatile natural gas liquids (NGL) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stream.
As an alternative to transportation in pipelines, natural gas at remote locations is sometimes liquefied and transported in special LNG tankers to appropriate LNG receiving and storage terminals. The LNG can then be re-vaporized and used as a gaseous fuel in the same fashion as natural gas. Although LNG usually has a major proportion of methane, i.e., methane comprises at least 50 mole percent of the LNG, it also contains relatively lesser amounts of heavier hydrocarbons such as ethane, propane, butanes, and the like, as well as nitrogen. It is often necessary to separate some or all of the heavier hydrocarbons from the methane in the LNG so that the gaseous fuel resulting from vaporizing the LNG conforms to pipeline specifications for heating value. In addition, it is often also desirable to separate the heavier hydrocarbons from the methane and ethane because these hydrocarbons have a higher value as liquid products (for use as petrochemical feedstocks, as an example) than their value as fuel.
Although there are many processes which may be used to separate ethane and/or propane and heavier hydrocarbons from LNG, these processes often must compromise between high recovery, low utility costs, and process simplicity (and hence low capital investment). U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,952,984; 3,837,172; 5,114,451; and 7,155,931 describe relevant LNG processes capable of ethane or propane recovery while producing the lean LNG as a vapor stream that is thereafter compressed to delivery pressure to enter a gas distribution network. However, lower utility costs may be possible if the lean LNG is instead produced as a liquid stream that can be pumped (rather than compressed) to the delivery pressure of the gas distribution network, with the lean LNG subsequently vaporized using a low level source of external heat or other means. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,604,380; 6,907,752; 6,941,771; 7,069,743; and 7,216,507 and co-pending application Ser. Nos. 11/749,268 and 12/060,362 describe such processes.
Economics and logistics often dictate that LNG receiving terminals be located close to the natural gas transmission lines that will transport the re-vaporized LNG to consumers. In many cases, these areas also have plants for processing natural gas produced in the region to recover the heavier hydrocarbons contained in the natural gas. Available processes for separating these heavier hydrocarbons include those based upon cooling and refrigeration of gas, oil absorption, and refrigerated oil absorption. Additionally, cryogenic processes have become popular because of the availability of economical equipment that produces power while simultaneously expanding and extracting heat from the gas being processed. Depending upon the pressure of the gas source, the richness (ethane, ethylene, and heavier hydrocarbons content) of the gas, and the desired end products, each of these processes or a combination thereof may be employed.
The cryogenic expansion process is now generally preferred for natural gas liquids recovery because it provides maximum simplicity with ease of startup, operating flexibility, good efficiency, safety, and good reliability. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,292,380; 4,061,481; 4,140,504; 4,157,904; 4,171,964; 4,185,978; 4,251,249; 4,278,457; 4,519,824; 4,617,039; 4,687,499; 4,689,063; 4,690,702; 4,854,955; 4,869,740; 4,889,545; 5,275,005; 5,555,748; 5,566,554; 5,568,737; 5,771,712; 5,799,507; 5,881,569; 5,890,378; 5,983,664; 6,182,469; 6,578,379; 6,712,880; 6,915,662; 7,191,617; 7,219,513; reissue U.S. Pat. No. 33,408; and co-pending application Ser. Nos. 11/430,412; 11/839,693; 11/971,491; and 12/206,230 describe relevant processes (although the description of the present invention is based on different processing conditions than those described in the cited U.S. patents).
The present invention is generally concerned with the integrated recovery of ethylene, ethane, propylene, propane, and heavier hydrocarbons from such LNG and gas streams. It uses a novel process arrangement to integrate the heating of the LNG stream and the cooling of the gas stream to eliminate the need for a separate vaporizer and the need for external refrigeration, allowing high C2 component recovery while keeping the processing equipment simple and the capital investment low. Further, the present invention offers a reduction in the utilities (power and heat) required to process the LNG and gas streams, resulting in lower operating costs than other processes, and also offering significant reduction in capital investment.
Heretofore, assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 7,216,507 has been used to recover C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components in plants processing LNG, while assignee's co-pending application Ser. No. 11/430,412 could be used to recover C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components in plants processing natural gas. Surprisingly, applicants have found that by integrating certain features of the assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 7,216,507 invention with certain features of the assignee's co-pending application Ser. No. 11/430,412, extremely high C2 component recovery levels can be accomplished using less energy than that required by individual plants to process the LNG and natural gas separately.
A typical analysis of an LNG stream to be processed in accordance with this invention would be, in approximate mole percent, 92.2% methane, 6.0% ethane and other C2 components, 1.1% propane and other C3 components, and traces of butanes plus, with the balance made up of nitrogen. A typical analysis of a gas stream to be processed in accordance with this invention would be, in approximate mole percent, 80.1% methane, 9.5% ethane and other C2 components, 5.6% propane and other C3 components, 1.3% iso-butane, 1.1% normal butane, 0.8% pentanes plus, with the balance made up of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Sulfur containing gases are also sometimes present.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following examples and drawings. Referring to the drawings:
In the following explanation of the above figures, tables are provided summarizing flow rates calculated for representative process conditions. In the tables appearing herein, the values for flow rates (in moles per hour) have been rounded to the nearest whole number for convenience. The total stream rates shown in the tables include all non-hydrocarbon components and hence are generally larger than the sum of the stream flow rates for the hydrocarbon components. Temperatures indicated are approximate values rounded to the nearest degree. It should also be noted that the process design calculations performed for the purpose of comparing the processes depicted in the figures are based on the assumption of no heat leak from (or to) the surroundings to (or from) the process. The quality of commercially available insulating materials makes this a very reasonable assumption and one that is typically made by those skilled in the art.
For convenience, process parameters are reported in both the traditional British units and in the units of the Système International d'Unités (SI). The molar flow rates given in the tables may be interpreted as either pound moles per hour or kilogram moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as horsepower (HP) and/or thousand British Thermal Units per hour (MBTU/Hr) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in pound moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as kilowatts (kW) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in kilogram moles per hour.
The inlet gas stream 31 is cooled in heat exchanger 12 by heat exchange with a portion (stream 72a) of partially warmed LNG at −174° F. [−114° C.] and cool distillation stream 38a at −107° F. [−77° C.]. The cooled stream 31a enters separator 13 at −79° F. [−62° C.] and 584 psia [4,027 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 34) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). Liquid stream 35 is flash expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as expansion valve 17, to the operating pressure (approximately 430 psia [2,965 kPa(a)]) of fractionation tower 20. The expanded stream 35a leaving expansion valve 17 reaches a temperature of −93° F. [−70° C.] and is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a first mid-column feed point.
The vapor from separator 13 (stream 34) enters a work expansion machine 10 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 10 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to slightly above the tower operating pressure, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 34a to a temperature of approximately −101° F. [−74° C.]. The typical commercially available expanders are capable of recovering on the order of 80-88% of the work theoretically available in an ideal isentropic expansion. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 11) that can be used to re-compress the heated distillation stream (stream 38b), for example. The expanded stream 34a is further cooled to −124° F. [−87° C.] in heat exchanger 14 by heat exchange with cold distillation stream 38 at −143° F. [−97° C.], whereupon the partially condensed expanded stream 34b is thereafter supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second mid-column feed point.
The demethanizer in tower 20 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing to provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. The column also includes reboilers (such as reboiler 19) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column to strip the liquid product, stream 41, of methane and lighter components. Liquid product stream 41 exits the bottom of the tower at 99° F. [37° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product.
Overhead distillation stream 43 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 20 at −143° F. [−97° C.] and is divided into two portions, streams 44 and 47. The first portion, stream 44, flows to reflux condenser 23 where it is cooled to −237° F. [−149° C.] and totally condensed by heat exchange with a portion (stream 72) of the cold LNG (stream 71a). Condensed stream 44a enters reflux separator 24 wherein the condensed liquid (stream 46) is separated from any uncondensed vapor (stream 45). The liquid stream 46 from reflux separator 24 is pumped by reflux pump 25 to a pressure slightly above the operating pressure of demethanizer 20 and stream 46a is then supplied as cold top column feed (reflux) to demethanizer 20. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors rising in the upper section of demethanizer 20.
The second portion (stream 47) of overhead vapor stream 43 combines with any uncondensed vapor (stream 45) from reflux separator 24 to form cold distillation stream 38 at −143° F. [−97° C.]. Distillation stream 38 passes countercurrently to expanded stream 34a in heat exchanger 14 where it is heated to −107° F. [−77° C.] (stream 38a), and countercurrently to inlet gas in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to 47° F. [8° C.] (stream 38b). The distillation stream is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage is compressor 11 driven by expansion machine 10. The second stage is compressor 21 driven by a supplemental power source which compresses stream 38c to sales line pressure (stream 38d). After cooling to 126° F. [52° C.] in discharge cooler 22, stream 38e combines with warm LNG stream 71b to form the residue gas product (stream 42). Residue gas stream 42 flows to the sales gas pipeline at 1262 psia [8,701 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements.
The LNG (stream 71) from LNG tank 50 enters pump 51 at −251° F. [−157° C.]. Pump 51 elevates the pressure of the LNG sufficiently so that it can flow through heat exchangers and thence to the sales gas pipeline. Stream 71a exits the pump 51 at −242° F. [−152° C.] and 1364 psia [9,404 kPa(a)] and is divided into two portions, streams 72 and 73. The first portion, stream 72, is heated as described previously to −174° F. [−114° C.] in reflux condenser 23 as it provides cooling to the portion (stream 44) of overhead vapor stream 43 from fractionation tower 20, and to 43° F. [6° C.] in heat exchanger 12 as it provides cooling to the inlet gas. The second portion, stream 73, is heated to 35° F. [2° C.] in heat exchanger 53 using low level utility heat. The heated streams 72b and 73a recombine to form warm LNG stream 71b at 40° F. [4° C.], which thereafter combines with distillation stream 38e to form residue gas stream 42 as described previously.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
The recoveries reported in Table I are computed relative to the total quantities of ethane, propane, and butanes+ contained in the gas stream being processed in the plant and in the LNG stream. Although the recoveries are quite high relative to the heavier hydrocarbons contained in the gas being processed (99.58%, 100.00%, and 100.00%, respectively, for ethane, propane, and butanes+), none of the heavier hydrocarbons contained in the LNG stream are captured in the
In the simulation of the
The second portion, stream 76, is heated to −79° F. [−62° C.] in heat exchanger 52 by cooling compressed overhead distillation stream 79a at −70° F. [−57° C.] and reflux stream 82 at −128° F. [−89° C.]. The partially heated stream 76a is further heated and vaporized in heat exchanger 53 using low level utility heat. The heated stream 76b at −5° F. [−20° C.] and 1334 psia [9,198 kPa(a)] enters work expansion machine 55 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 55 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 76c to a temperature of approximately −107° F. [−77° C.] before it is supplied as feed to fractionation column 62 at a lower mid-column feed point.
The demethanizer in fractionation column 62 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing consisting of two sections. The upper absorbing (rectification) section contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the vapors rising upward and cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb the ethane and heavier components; the lower stripping (demethanizing) section contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. The demethanizing section also includes one or more reboilers (such as side reboiler 60 using low level utility heat, and reboiler 61 using high level utility heat) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column. The column liquid stream 80 exits the bottom of the tower at 54° F. [12° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product.
Overhead distillation stream 79 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 62 at −144° F. [−98° C.] and flows to compressor 56 driven by expansion machine 55, where it is compressed to 807 psia [5,567 kPa(a)] (stream 79a). At this pressure, the stream is totally condensed as it is cooled to −128° F. [−89° C.] in heat exchanger 52 as described previously. The condensed liquid (stream 79b) is then divided into two portions, streams 83 and 82. The first portion (stream 83) is the methane-rich lean LNG stream, which is pumped by pump 63 to 1278 psia [8,809 kPa(a)] for subsequent vaporization in heat exchangers 14 and 12, heating stream 83a to −114° F. [−81° C.] and then to 40° F. [4° C.] as described in paragraphs [0036] and [0033] below to produce warm lean LNG stream 83c.
The remaining portion of condensed liquid stream 79b, reflux stream 82, flows to heat exchanger 52 where it is subcooled to −237° F. [−149° C.] by heat exchange with a portion of the cold LNG (stream 76) as described previously. The subcooled stream 82a is then expanded to the operating pressure of demethanizer 62 by expansion valve 57. The expanded stream 82b at −236° F. [−149° C.] is then supplied as cold top column feed (reflux) to demethanizer 62. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors rising in the upper rectification section of demethanizer 62.
In the simulation of the
Vapor stream 34 from separator 13 enters a work expansion machine 10 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 10 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 34a to a temperature of approximately −121° F. [−85° C.]. The partially condensed expanded stream 34a is thereafter supplied as feed to fractionation tower 20 at a second lower mid-column feed point.
The demethanizer in fractionation column 20 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing consisting of two sections. The upper absorbing (rectification) section contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the vapors rising upward and cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb the ethane and heavier components; the lower stripping (demethanizing) section contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. The demethanizing section also includes one or more reboilers (such as the side reboiler in heat exchanger 12 described previously, and reboiler 19 using high level utility heat) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column. The column liquid stream 40 exits the bottom of the tower at 89° F. [31° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product, and combines with stream 80 to form the liquid product (stream 41).
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 44) is withdrawn from the upper region of the stripping section of fractionation column 20 at −125° F. [−87° C.] and compressed to 545 psia [3,756 kPa(a)] by compressor 26. The compressed stream 44a is then cooled from −87° F. [−66° C.] to −143° F. [−97° C.] and condensed (stream 44b) in heat exchanger 14 by heat exchange with cold overhead distillation stream 38 exiting the top of demethanizer 20 and cold lean LNG (stream 83a) at −116° F. [−82° C.]. Condensed liquid stream 44b is expanded by expansion valve 16 to a pressure slightly above the operating pressure of demethanizer 20, and the resulting stream 44c at −146° F. [−99° C.] is then supplied as cold liquid reflux to an intermediate region in the absorbing section of demethanizer 20. This supplemental reflux absorbs and condenses most of the C3 components and heavier components (as well as some of the C2 components) from the vapors rising in the lower rectification region of the absorbing section so that only a small amount of recycle (stream 36) must be cooled, condensed, subcooled, and flash expanded to produce the top reflux stream 36c that provides the final rectification in the upper region of the absorbing section of demethanizer 20. As the cold reflux stream 36c contacts the rising vapors in the upper region of the absorbing section, it condenses and absorbs the C2 components and any remaining C3 components and heavier components from the vapors so that they can be captured in the bottom product (stream 40) from demethanizer 20.
Overhead distillation stream 38 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 20 at −148° F. [−100° C.]. It passes countercurrently to compressed distillation vapor stream 44a and recycle stream 36a in heat exchanger 14 where it is heated to −114° F. [−81° C.] (stream 38a), and countercurrently to inlet gas stream 31 and recycle stream 36 in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to 20° F. [−7° C.] (stream 38b). The distillation stream is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage is compressor 11 driven by expansion machine 10. The second stage is compressor 21 driven by a supplemental power source which compresses stream 38c to sales line pressure (stream 38d). After cooling to 126° F. [52° C.] in discharge cooler 22, stream 38e is divided into two portions, stream 37 and recycle stream 36. Stream 37 combines with warm lean LNG stream 83c to form the residue gas product (stream 42). Residue gas stream 42 flows to the sales gas pipeline at 1262 psia [8,701 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements.
Recycle stream 36 flows to heat exchanger 12 and is cooled to −105° F. [−76° C.] by heat exchange with cool lean LNG (stream 83b), cool overhead distillation stream 38a, and demethanizer liquids (stream 39) as described previously. Stream 36a is further cooled to −143° F. [−97° C.] by heat exchange with cold lean LNG stream 83a and cold overhead distillation stream 38 in heat exchanger 14 as described previously. The substantially condensed stream 36b is then expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as expansion valve 15, to the demethanizer operating pressure, resulting in cooling of the total stream to −151° F. [−102° C.]. The expanded stream 36c is then supplied to fractionation tower 20 as the top column feed. Any vapor portion of stream 36c combines with the vapors rising from the top fractionation stage of the column to form overhead distillation stream 38, which is withdrawn from an upper region of the tower as described previously.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
Comparison of the recovery levels displayed in Tables I and II shows that the liquids recovery of the
In the simulation of the
The heated stream 71c enters separator 54 at 11° F. [−12° C.] and 1334 psia [9,198 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 77) is separated from any remaining liquid (stream 78). Vapor stream 77 enters a work expansion machine 55 in which mechanical energy is extracted from the high pressure feed. The machine 55 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure (approximately 412 psia [2,839 kPa(a)]), with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 77a to a temperature of approximately −100° F. [−73° C.]. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 56) that can be used to re-compress a portion (stream 81) of the column overhead vapor (stream 79), for example. The partially condensed expanded stream 77a is thereafter supplied as feed to fractionation column 20 at a first mid-column feed point. The separator liquid (stream 78), if any, is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 59 before expanded stream 78a is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a first lower mid-column feed point.
In the simulation of the
The vapor (stream 34) from separator 13 enters a work expansion machine 10 in which mechanical energy is extracted from this portion of the high pressure feed. The machine 10 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 20, with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 34a to a temperature of approximately −108° F. [−78° C.]. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 11) that can be used to re-compress the heated distillation stream (stream 38a), for example. The expanded partially condensed stream 34a is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second mid-column feed point. Liquid stream 35 is flash expanded through an appropriate expansion device, such as expansion valve 17, to the operating pressure of fractionation tower 20. The expanded stream 35a leaving expansion valve 17 reaches a temperature of −99° F. [−73° C.] and is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second lower mid-column feed point.
The demethanizer in fractionation column 20 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing. The fractionation tower 20 may consist of two sections. The upper absorbing (rectification) section 20a contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the vapors rising upward and cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb the ethane and heavier components; the lower stripping (demethanizing) section 20b contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. Demethanizing section 20b also includes one or more reboilers (such as the side reboiler in heat exchanger 12 described previously, side reboiler 18 using low level utility heat, and reboiler 19 using high level utility heat) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquids flowing down the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column. The column liquid stream 41 exits the bottom of the tower at 83° F. [28° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product.
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 44) is withdrawn from the upper region of stripping section 20b of fractionation column 20 at −120° F. [−84° C.] and is cooled to −143° F. [−97° C.] and condensed (stream 44a) in heat exchanger 52 by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a). Condensed liquid stream 44a is pumped to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by pump 27, whereupon stream 44b at −143° F. [−97° C.] is then supplied as cold liquid reflux to an intermediate region in absorbing section 20a of fractionation column 20. This supplemental reflux absorbs and condenses most of the C3 components and heavier components (as well as some of the C2 components) from the vapors rising in the lower rectification region of absorbing section 20a so that only a small amount of the lean LNG (stream 82) must be subcooled to produce the top reflux stream 82b that provides the final rectification in the upper region of absorbing section 20a of fractionation column 20.
Overhead distillation stream 79 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 20 at −145° F. [−98° C.] and is divided into two portions, stream 81 and stream 38. The first portion (stream 81) flows to compressor 56 driven by expansion machine 55, where it is compressed to 1092 psia [7,529 kPa(a)] (stream 81a). At this pressure, the stream is totally condensed as it is cooled to −106° F. [−77° C.] in heat exchanger 52 as described previously. The condensed liquid (stream 81b) is then divided into two portions, streams 83 and 82. The first portion (stream 83) is the methane-rich lean LNG stream, which is pumped by pump 63 to 1273 psia [8,777 kPa(a)] for subsequent vaporization in heat exchanger 12, heating stream 83a to 65° F. [18° C.] as described previously to produce warm lean LNG stream 83b.
The remaining portion of stream 81b (stream 82) flows to heat exchanger 52 where it is subcooled to −234° F. [−148° C.] by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a) as described previously. The subcooled stream 82a is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 57. The expanded stream 82b at −232° F. [−146° C.] is then supplied as cold top column feed (reflux) to demethanizer 20. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors rising in the upper rectification region of absorbing section 20a of demethanizer 20.
The second portion of overhead distillation stream 79 (stream 38) flows countercurrently to inlet gas stream 31 in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to −62° F. [−52° C.] (stream 38a). The distillation stream is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage is compressor 11 driven by expansion machine 10. The second stage is compressor 21 driven by a supplemental power source which compresses stream 38b to sales gas line pressure (stream 38c). (Note that discharge cooler 22 is not needed in this example. Some applications may require cooling of compressed distillation stream 38c so that the resultant temperature when mixed with warm lean LNG stream 83b is sufficiently cool to comply with the requirements of the sales gas pipeline.) Stream 38c/38d then combines with warm lean LNG stream 83b to form the residue gas product (stream 42). Residue gas stream 42 at 89° F. [32° C.] flows to the sales gas pipeline at 1262 psia [8,701 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
The improvement offered by the
Comparing the recovery levels displayed in Table III for the
There are five primary factors that account for the improved efficiency of the present invention. First, compared to many prior art processes, the present invention does not depend on the LNG feed itself to directly serve as the reflux for fractionation column 20. Rather, the refrigeration inherent in the cold LNG is used in heat exchanger 52 to generate a liquid reflux stream (stream 82) that contains very little of the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components that are to be recovered, resulting in efficient rectification in the upper region of absorbing section 20a in fractionation tower 20 and avoiding the equilibrium limitations of such prior art processes. Second, using distillation vapor stream 44 to produce supplemental reflux for the lower region of absorbing section 20a in fractionation column 20 allows using less top reflux (stream 82b) for fractionation tower 20. The lower top reflux flow, plus the greater degree of heating using low level utility heat in heat exchanger 53, results in less total liquid feeding fractionation column 20, reducing the duty required in reboiler 19 and minimizing the amount of high level utility heat needed to meet the specification for the bottom liquid product from demethanizer 20. Third, the rectification of the column vapors provided by absorbing section 20a allows all of the LNG feed to be vaporized before entering work expansion machine 55 as stream 77, resulting in significant power recovery. This power can then be used to compress the first portion (stream 81) of distillation overhead stream 79 to a pressure sufficiently high so that it can be condensed in heat exchanger 52 and so that the resulting lean LNG (stream 83) can then be pumped to the pipeline delivery pressure. (Pumping uses significantly less power than compressing.)
Fourth, using the cold lean LNG stream 83a to provide “free” refrigeration to the gas stream in heat exchanger 12 eliminates the need for a separate vaporization means (such as heat exchanger 53 in the
An alternative method of processing LNG and natural gas is shown in another embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in
In the simulation of the
The heated stream 71c enters separator 54 at 3° F. [−16° C.] and 1334 psia [9,198 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 77) is separated from any remaining liquid (stream 78). Vapor stream 77 enters a work expansion machine 55 in which mechanical energy is extracted from the high pressure feed. The machine 55 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure (approximately 420 psia [2,896 kPa(a)]), with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 77a to a temperature of approximately −102° F. [−75° C.]. The partially condensed expanded stream 77a is thereafter supplied as feed to fractionation column 20 at a first mid-column feed point. The separator liquid (stream 78), if any, is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 59 before expanded stream 78a is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a first lower mid-column feed point.
In the simulation of the
The cooled stream 31b enters separator 13 at −81° F. [−63° C.] and 428 psia [2,949 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 34) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). Vapor stream 34 is cooled to −122° F. [−86° C.] in heat exchanger 14 by heat exchange with cold distillation stream 38, and the partially condensed stream 34a is then supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second mid-column feed point. Liquid stream 35 is directed through valve 17 and is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second lower mid-column feed point.
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 44) is withdrawn from the upper region of the stripping section of fractionation column 20 at −119° F. [−84° C.] and is cooled to −145° F. [−98° C.] and condensed (stream 44a) in heat exchanger 52 by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a). Condensed liquid stream 44a is pumped to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by pump 27, whereupon stream 44b at −144° F. [−98° C.] is then supplied as cold liquid reflux to an intermediate region in the absorbing section of fractionation column 20. This supplemental reflux absorbs and condenses most of the C3 components and heavier components (as well as some of the C2 components) from the vapors rising in the lower rectification region of the absorbing section of fractionation column 20.
The column liquid stream 41 exits the bottom of the tower at 85° F. [29° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product. Overhead distillation stream 79 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 20 at −144° F. [−98° C.] and is divided into two portions, stream 81 and stream 38. The first portion (stream 81) flows to compressor 56 driven by expansion machine 55, where it is compressed to 929 psia [6,405 kPa(a)] (stream 81a). At this pressure, the stream is totally condensed as it is cooled to −108° F. [−78° C.] in heat exchanger 52 as described previously. The condensed liquid (stream 81b) is then divided into two portions, streams 83 and 82. The first portion (stream 83) is the methane-rich lean LNG stream, which is pumped by pump 63 to 1273 psia [8,777 kPa(a)] for subsequent vaporization in heat exchanger 12, heating stream 83a to 65° F. [18° C.] as described previously to produce warm lean LNG stream 83b.
The remaining portion of stream 81b (stream 82) flows to heat exchanger 52 where it is subcooled to −235° F. [−148° C.] by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a) as described previously. The subcooled stream 82a is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 57. The expanded stream 82b at −233° F. [−147° C.] is then supplied as cold top column feed (reflux) to demethanizer 20. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors rising in the upper rectification region of the absorbing section of demethanizer 20.
The second portion of overhead distillation stream 79 (stream 38) flows countercurrently to separator vapor stream 34 in heat exchanger 14 where it is heated to −87° F. [−66° C.] (stream 38a), and to expanded inlet gas stream 31a in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to −47° F. [−44° C.] (stream 38b). The distillation stream is then re-compressed in two stages. The first stage is compressor 11 driven by expansion machine 10. The second stage is compressor 21 driven by a supplemental power source which compresses stream 38c to sales gas line pressure (stream 38d). Stream 38d/38e then combines with warm lean LNG stream 83b to form the residue gas product (stream 42). Residue gas stream 42 at 99° F. [37° C.] flows to the sales gas pipeline at 1262 psia [8,701 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
A comparison of Tables III and IV shows that the
Another alternative method of processing LNG and natural gas is shown in the embodiment of the present invention as illustrated in
In the simulation of the
The heated stream 71c enters separator 54 at 1° F. [−17° C.] and 1334 psia [9,198 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 77) is separated from any remaining liquid (stream 78). Vapor stream 77 enters a work expansion machine 55 in which mechanical energy is extracted from the high pressure feed. The machine 55 expands the vapor substantially isentropically to the tower operating pressure (approximately 395 psia [2,721 kPa(a)]), with the work expansion cooling the expanded stream 77a to a temperature of approximately −107° F. [−77° C.]. The partially condensed expanded stream 77a is thereafter supplied as feed to fractionation column 20 at a first mid-column feed point. The separator liquid (stream 78), if any, is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 59 before expanded stream 78a is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a first lower mid-column feed point.
In the simulation of the
The cooled stream 31b enters separator 13 at −81° F. [−63° C.] and 403 psia [2,777 kPa(a)] where the vapor (stream 34) is separated from the condensed liquid (stream 35). Vapor stream 34 is cooled to −117° F. [−83° C.] in heat exchanger 52 by heat exchange with cold LNG stream 71a and compressed distillation stream 38a, and the partially condensed stream 34a is then supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second mid-column feed point. Liquid stream 35 is directed through valve 17 and is supplied to fractionation tower 20 at a second lower mid-column feed point.
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 44) is withdrawn from the upper region of the stripping section of fractionation column 20 at −119° F. [−84° C.] and is cooled to −145° F. [−98° C.] and condensed (stream 44a) in heat exchanger 52 by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a). Condensed liquid stream 44a is pumped to slightly above the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by pump 27, whereupon stream 44b at −144° F. [−98° C.] is then supplied as cold liquid reflux to an intermediate region in the absorbing section of fractionation column 20. This supplemental reflux absorbs and condenses most of the C3 components and heavier components (as well as some of the C2 components) from the vapors rising in the lower rectification region of the absorbing section of fractionation column 20.
The column liquid stream 41 exits the bottom of the tower at 79° F. [26° C.], based on a typical specification of a methane to ethane ratio of 0.020:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product. Overhead distillation stream 79 is withdrawn from the upper section of fractionation tower 20 at −147° F. [−99° C.] and is divided into two portions, stream 81 and stream 38. The first portion (stream 81) flows to compressor 56 driven by expansion machine 55, where it is compressed to 1124 psia [7,750 kPa(a)] (stream 81a). At this pressure, the stream is totally condensed as it is cooled to −103° F. [−75° C.] in heat exchanger 52 as described previously. The condensed liquid (stream 81b) is then divided into two portions, streams 83 and 82. The first portion (stream 83) is the methane-rich lean LNG stream, which is pumped by pump 63 to 1273 psia [8,777 kPa(a)] for subsequent vaporization in heat exchanger 12, heating stream 83a to 65° F. [18° C.] as described previously to produce warm lean LNG stream 83b.
The remaining portion of stream 81b (stream 82) flows to heat exchanger 52 where it is subcooled to −236° F. [−149° C.] by heat exchange with the cold LNG (stream 71a) as described previously. The subcooled stream 82a is expanded to the operating pressure of fractionation column 20 by expansion valve 57. The expanded stream 82b at −233° F. [−147° C.] is then supplied as cold top column feed (reflux) to demethanizer 20. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components from the vapors rising in the upper rectification region of the absorbing section of demethanizer 20.
The second portion of overhead distillation stream 79 (stream 38) is compressed to 625 psia [4,309 kPa(a)] by compressor 11 driven by expansion machine 10. It then flows countercurrently to separator vapor stream 34 in heat exchanger 52 where it is heated from −97° F. [−72° C.] to −65° F. [−53° C.] (stream 38b), and to expanded inlet gas stream 31a in heat exchanger 12 where it is heated to 12° F. [−11° C.] (stream 38c). The distillation stream is then further compressed to sales gas line pressure (stream 38d) in compressor 21 driven by a supplemental power source, and stream 38d/38e then combines with warm lean LNG stream 83b to form the residue gas product (stream 42). Residue gas stream 42 at 107° F. [42° C.] flows to the sales gas pipeline at 1262 psia [8,701 kPa(a)], sufficient to meet line requirements.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
A comparison of Tables III, IV, and V shows that the
In accordance with this invention, it is generally advantageous to design the absorbing (rectification) section of the demethanizer to contain multiple theoretical separation stages. However, the benefits of the present invention can be achieved with as few as one theoretical stage, and it is believed that even the equivalent of a fractional theoretical stage may allow achieving these benefits. For instance, all or a part of the cold reflux (stream 82b), all or a part of the condensed liquid (stream 44b), and all or a part of streams 77a and 34a can be combined (such as in the piping to the demethanizer) and if thoroughly intermingled, the vapors and liquids will mix together and separate in accordance with the relative volatilities of the various components of the total combined streams. Such commingling of these streams shall be considered for the purposes of this invention as constituting an absorbing section.
In the examples shown, total condensation of streams 44a and 81b is illustrated in
When the inlet gas is leaner, separator 13 in
Feed gas conditions, LNG conditions, plant size, available equipment, or other factors may indicate that elimination of work expansion machines 10 and/or 55, or replacement with an alternate expansion device (such as an expansion valve), is feasible. Although individual stream expansion is depicted in particular expansion devices, alternative expansion means may be employed where appropriate.
In
In the embodiments of the present invention illustrated in
The relative locations of the mid-column feeds may vary depending on inlet gas composition, LNG composition, or other factors such as the desired recovery level and the amount of vapor formed during heating of the LNG stream. Moreover, two or more of the feed streams, or portions thereof, may be combined depending on the relative temperatures and quantities of individual streams, and the combined stream then fed to a mid-column feed position.
The present invention provides improved recovery of C2 components and heavier hydrocarbon components per amount of utility consumption required to operate the process. An improvement in utility consumption required for operating the process may appear in the form of reduced power requirements for compression or pumping, reduced energy requirements for tower reboilers, or a combination thereof. Alternatively, the advantages of the present invention may be realized by accomplishing higher recovery levels for a given amount of utility consumption, or through some combination of higher recovery and improvement in utility consumption.
In the examples given for the
While there have been described what are believed to be preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further modifications may be made thereto, e.g. to adapt the invention to various conditions, types of feed, or other requirements without departing from the spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/466,661, filed May 15, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2603310 | Gilmore | Jul 1952 | A |
2880592 | Davison et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2952984 | Marshall, Jr. | Sep 1960 | A |
3292380 | Bucklin | Dec 1966 | A |
3507127 | De Marco | Apr 1970 | A |
3516261 | Hoffman | Jun 1970 | A |
3524897 | Kniel | Aug 1970 | A |
3656311 | Kaiser | Apr 1972 | A |
3675435 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3724226 | Pachaly | Apr 1973 | A |
3763658 | Gaumer, Jr. et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3837172 | Markbreiter et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3902329 | King, III et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3983711 | Solomon | Oct 1976 | A |
4002042 | Pryor et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004430 | Solomon et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4033735 | Swenson | Jul 1977 | A |
4061481 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4065278 | Newton et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4115086 | Jordan et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4132604 | Alexion et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4140504 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4157904 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4171964 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4185978 | McGalliard et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4203741 | Bellinger et al. | May 1980 | A |
4251249 | Gulsby | Feb 1981 | A |
4278457 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4284423 | Eakman et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4318723 | Holmes et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4322225 | Bellinger et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4356014 | Higgins | Oct 1982 | A |
4368061 | Mestrallet et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4404008 | Rentler et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4430103 | Gray et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4445916 | Newton | May 1984 | A |
4445917 | Chiu | May 1984 | A |
4453958 | Gulsby et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4507133 | Khan et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519824 | Huebel | May 1985 | A |
4525185 | Newton | Jun 1985 | A |
4545795 | Liu et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4592766 | Kumman et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4596588 | Cook | Jun 1986 | A |
4600421 | Kummann | Jul 1986 | A |
4617039 | Buck | Oct 1986 | A |
4657571 | Gazzi | Apr 1987 | A |
4676812 | Kummann | Jun 1987 | A |
4687499 | Aghili | Aug 1987 | A |
4689063 | Paradowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690702 | Paradowski et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698081 | Aghili | Oct 1987 | A |
4705549 | Sapper | Nov 1987 | A |
4707170 | Ayres et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710214 | Sharma et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4711651 | Sharma et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4718927 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4720294 | Lucadamo et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738699 | Apffel | Apr 1988 | A |
4746342 | DeLong et al. | May 1988 | A |
4752312 | Prible | Jun 1988 | A |
4755200 | Liu et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4793841 | Burr | Dec 1988 | A |
4851020 | Montgomery, IV | Jul 1989 | A |
4854955 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869740 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4881960 | Ranke et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4889545 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895584 | Buck et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
RE33408 | Khan et al. | Oct 1990 | E |
4966612 | Bauer | Oct 1990 | A |
4970867 | Herron et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5114451 | Rambo et al. | May 1992 | A |
5275005 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291736 | Paradowski | Mar 1994 | A |
5325673 | Durr et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335504 | Durr et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5363655 | Kikkawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365740 | Kikkawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421165 | Paradowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5537827 | Low et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546764 | Mehra | Aug 1996 | A |
5555748 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566554 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568737 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600969 | Low | Feb 1997 | A |
5615561 | Houshmand et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5651269 | Prevost et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669234 | Houser et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675054 | Manley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685170 | Sorensen | Nov 1997 | A |
5737940 | Yao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755114 | Foglietta | May 1998 | A |
5755115 | Manley | May 1998 | A |
5771712 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799507 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5881569 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890377 | Foglietta | Apr 1999 | A |
5890378 | Rambo et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893274 | Nagelvoort et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5950453 | Bowen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983664 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992175 | Yao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014869 | Elion et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016665 | Cole et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023942 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053007 | Victory et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062041 | Kikkawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6116050 | Yao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119479 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125653 | Shu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6182469 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237365 | Trebble | May 2001 | B1 |
6244070 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250105 | Kimble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269655 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272882 | Hodges et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308531 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324867 | Fanning et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336344 | O'Brien | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347532 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361582 | Pinnau et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363744 | Finn et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6367286 | Price | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401486 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6453698 | Jain et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6516631 | Trebble | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526777 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564579 | McCartney | May 2003 | B1 |
6565626 | Baker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578379 | Paradowski | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604380 | Reddick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6694775 | Higginbotham et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712880 | Foglietta et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742358 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6889523 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907752 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915662 | Wilkinson et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6941771 | Reddick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945075 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986266 | Narinsky | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010937 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7069743 | Prim | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7155931 | Wilkinson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159417 | Foglietta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165423 | Winningham | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7191617 | Cuellar et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7204100 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210311 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216507 | Cuellar et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219513 | Mostafa | May 2007 | B1 |
7273542 | Duhon et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278281 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7565815 | Wilkinson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7631516 | Cuellar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7714180 | Duhon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8434325 | Martinez et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8590340 | Pitman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020166336 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005722 | Wilkinson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040079107 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040172967 | Patel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177646 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050066686 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050204774 | Foglietta et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229634 | Huebel et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247078 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268649 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000234 | Cuellar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032269 | Cuellar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060086139 | Eaton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130521 | Patel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060260355 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260356 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277943 | Yokohata et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283207 | Pitman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001322 | Aikhorin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070231244 | Shah et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080000265 | Cuellar et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080078205 | Cuellar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080271480 | Mak | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282731 | Cuellar et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090100862 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107174 | Ambari et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107175 | Patel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113930 | Patel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100236285 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251764 | Johnke et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275647 | Johnke et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287983 | Johnke et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287984 | Johnke et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100326134 | Johnke et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110067441 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067442 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067443 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110167868 | Pierce et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110226011 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226012 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226013 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110226014 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232328 | Johnke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110296867 | Cuellar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 182 643 | May 1986 | EP |
1 114 808 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1535846 | Aug 1968 | FR |
2102931 | Feb 1983 | GB |
1606828 | Oct 1986 | SU |
9923428 | May 1999 | WO |
9937962 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0033006 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0034724 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0188447 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0214763 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2004076946 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004109180 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005015100 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005035692 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2007001669 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Huang et al., “Select the Optimum Extraction Method for LNG Regasification; Varying Energy Compositions of LNG Imports may Require Terminal Operators to Remove C2+ Compounds before Injecting Regasified LNG into Pipelines”, Hydrocarbon ProcessinJL 83, 57-62, Jul. 2004. |
Yang et al., “Cost-Effective Design Reduces C2 and C3 at LNG Receiving Terminals”, Oil & Gas Journal, 50-53, May 26, 2003. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/034732 dated Jul. 15, 2010—1 page. |
Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/034732 dated Jul. 15, 2010—10 pages. |
B.C. Price et al., “LNG Production for Peak Shaving Operations”, Proceedings of the Seventy-eighth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Nashville, Tennessee, Mar. 1-3, 1999, 8 sheets. |
FIG. 16-33, on p. 16-24 of the Engineering Data Book, Twelfth Edition, published by the Gas Processors Suppliers Association 2004. |
Finn et al., “LNG Technology for Offshore and Mid-scale Plants”, Proceedings of the Seventy-ninth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 13-15, 2003, 23 sheets. |
Kikkawa et al., “Optimize the Power System of Baseload LNG Plant”, Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, San Antonio, Texas, Mar. 12-14, 2001, 23 sheets. |
Mowrey, E. Ross., “Efficient, High Recovery of Liquids from Natural Gas Utilizing a High Pressure Absorber,” Proceedings of the Eighty-First Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Dallas, Texas, Mar. 11-13, 2002—10 pages. |
“Dew Point Control Gas Conditioning Units,” SME Products Brochure, Gas Processors Assoc. Conference (Apr. 5, 2009)—2 pages. |
“Fuel Gas Conditioning Units for Compressor Engines,” SME Products Brochure, Gas Processors Assoc. Conference (Apr. 5, 2009)—2 pages. |
“P&ID Fuel Gas Conditioner,” Drawing No. SMEP-901, Date Drawn: Aug. 29, 2007, SME, available at http://www.sme-llc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009)—1 page. |
“Fuel Gas Conditioner Preliminary Arrangement,” Drawing No. SMP-1007-00, Date Drawn: Nov. 11, 2008, SME, available at http://www.sme-llc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009)—2 pages. |
“Product: Fuel Gas Conditioning Units,” SME Associates, LLC, available at http://www.smellc.com/sme.cfm?a=prd&catID=58&subID=44&prdID=155 (Apr. 24, 2009)—1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130283853 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12466661 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 13790873 | US |