This invention relates to a process for the separation of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons or propane and heavier hydrocarbons from liquefied natural gas, hereinafter referred to as LNG, to provide a volatile methane-rich gas stream and a less volatile natural gas liquids (NGL) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) stream.
As an alternative to transportation in pipelines, natural gas at remote locations is sometimes liquefied and transported in special LNG tankers to appropriate LNG receiving and storage terminals. The LNG can then be re-vaporized and used as a gaseous fuel in the same fashion as natural gas. Although LNG usually has a major proportion of methane, i.e., methane comprises at least 50 mole percent of the LNG, it also contains relatively lesser amounts of heavier hydrocarbons such as ethane, propane, butanes, and the like, as well as nitrogen. It is often necessary to separate some or all of the heavier hydrocarbons from the methane in the LNG so that the gaseous fuel resulting from vaporizing the LNG conforms to pipeline specifications for heating value. In addition, it is often also desirable to separate the heavier hydrocarbons from the methane and ethane because these hydrocarbons have a higher value as liquid products (for use as petrochemical feedstocks, as an example) than their value as fuel.
Although there are many processes which may be used to separate ethane and/or propane and heavier hydrocarbons from LNG, these processes often must compromise between high recovery, low utility costs, and process simplicity (and hence low capital investment). U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,952,984; 3,837,172; 5,114,451; and 7,155,931 describe relevant LNG processes capable of ethane or propane recovery while producing the lean LNG as a vapor stream that is thereafter compressed to delivery pressure to enter a gas distribution network. However, lower utility costs may be possible if the lean LNG is instead produced as a liquid stream that can be pumped (rather than compressed) to the delivery pressure of the gas distribution network, with the lean LNG subsequently vaporized using a low level source of external heat or other means. U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,069,743 and 7,216,507 and co-pending application Ser. No. 11/749,268 describe such processes.
The present invention is generally concerned with the recovery of propylene, propane, and heavier hydrocarbons from such LNG streams. It uses a novel process arrangement to allow high propane recovery while keeping the processing equipment simple and the capital investment low. Further, the present invention offers a reduction in the utilities (power and heat) required to process the LNG to give lower operating cost than the prior art processes, and also offers significant reduction in capital investment. A typical analysis of an LNG stream to be processed in accordance with this invention would be, in approximate mole percent, 86.7% methane, 8.9% ethane and other C2 components, 2.9% propane and other C3 components, and 1.0% butanes plus, with the balance made up of nitrogen.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following examples and drawings. Referring to the drawings:
In the following explanation of the above figures, tables are provided summarizing flow rates calculated for representative process conditions. In the tables appearing herein, the values for flow rates (in moles per hour) have been rounded to the nearest whole number for convenience. The total stream rates shown in the tables include all non-hydrocarbon components and hence are generally larger than the sum of the stream flow rates for the hydrocarbon components. Temperatures indicated are approximate values rounded to the nearest degree. It should also be noted that the process design calculations performed for the purpose of comparing the processes depicted in the figures are based on the assumption of no heat leak from (or to) the surroundings to (or from) the process. The quality of commercially available insulating materials makes this a very reasonable assumption and one that is typically made by those skilled in the art.
For convenience, process parameters are reported in both the traditional British units and in the units of the Système International d'Unités (SI). The molar flow rates given in the tables may be interpreted as either pound moles per hour or kilogram moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as horsepower (HP) and/or thousand British Thermal Units per hour (MBTU/Hr) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in pound moles per hour. The energy consumptions reported as kilowatts (kW) correspond to the stated molar flow rates in kilogram moles per hour.
In the simulation of the
The deethanizer in tower 21 is a conventional distillation column containing a plurality of vertically spaced trays, one or more packed beds, or some combination of trays and packing. The deethanizer tower consists of two sections: an upper absorbing (rectification) section 21a that contains the necessary trays or packing to provide the necessary contact between the vapor portion of stream 41c rising upward and cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb propane and heavier components from the vapor portion; and a lower, stripping section 21b that contains the trays and/or packing to provide the necessary contact between the liquids falling downward and the vapors rising upward. The deethanizer stripping section 21b also includes one or more reboilers (such as reboiler 25) which heat and vaporize a portion of the liquid at the bottom of the column to provide the stripping vapors which flow up the column. These vapors strip the methane and C2 components from the liquids, so that the bottom liquid product (stream 51) is substantially devoid of methane and C2 components and is comprised of the majority of the C3 components and heavier hydrocarbons contained in the LNG feed stream.
Stream 41c enters fractionation column 21 at an upper mid-column feed position located in the lower region of absorbing section 21a of fractionation column 21. The liquid portion of stream 41c comingles with the liquids falling downward from the absorbing section and the combined liquid proceeds downward into stripping section 21b of deethanizer 21. The vapor portion of stream 41c rises upward through absorbing section 21a and is contacted with cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb the C3 components and heavier components.
A liquid stream 49 from deethanizer 21 is withdrawn from the lower region of absorbing section 21a and is routed to heat exchanger 13 where it is heated as it provides cooling of distillation vapor stream 50 as described earlier. Typically, the flow of this liquid from the deethanizer is via a thermosiphon circulation, but a pump could be used. The liquid stream is heated from −86° F. [−65° C.] to −65° F. [−54° C.], partially vaporizing stream 49c before it is returned as a mid-column feed to deethanizer 21, typically in the middle region of stripping section 21b. Alternatively, the liquid stream 49 may be routed directly without heating to the lower mid-column feed point in the stripping section 21b of deethanizer 21 as shown by dashed line 49a.
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 50) is withdrawn from the upper region of stripping section 21b at −10° F. [−23° C.]. This stream is then cooled and partially condensed (stream 50a) in exchanger 13 by heat exchange with LNG stream 41a and liquid stream 49 (if applicable) as described previously. The partially condensed stream 50a then flows to reflux separator 19 at −85° F. [−65° C.].
The operating pressure in reflux separator 19 (406 psia [2,797 kPa(a)]) is maintained slightly below the operating pressure of deethanizer 21 (415 psia [2,859 kPa(a)]). This provides the driving force which causes distillation vapor stream 50 to flow through heat exchanger 13 and thence into reflux separator 19 wherein the condensed liquid (stream 53) is separated from any uncondensed vapor (stream 52). Stream 52 then combines with the deethanizer overhead stream 48 to form cold residue gas stream 56 at −95° F. [−71° C.], which is then heated to 40° F. [4° C.] using low level utility heat in heat exchanger 27 before flowing to the sales gas pipeline at 381 psia [2,625 kPa(a)].
The liquid stream 53 from reflux separator 19 is pumped by pump 20 to a pressure slightly above the operating pressure of deethanizer 21, and the pumped stream 53a is then divided into at least two portions. One portion, stream 54, is supplied as top column feed (reflux) to deethanizer 21. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C3 components and heavier components rising in the upper rectification region of absorbing section 21a of deethanizer 21. The other portion, stream 55, is supplied to deethanizer 21 at a mid-column feed position located in the upper region of stripping section 21b, in substantially the same region where distillation vapor stream 50 is withdrawn, to provide partial rectification of stream 50.
The deethanizer overhead vapor (stream 48) exits the top of deethanizer 21 at −94° F. [−70° C.] and is combined with vapor stream 52 as described previously. The liquid product stream 51 exits the bottom of the tower at 185° F. [85° C.] based on an ethane:propane ratio of 0.02:1 on a molar basis in the bottom product, and flows to storage or further processing.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
There are three primary factors that account for the improved efficiency of the present invention. First, compared to many prior art processes, the present invention does not depend on the LNG feed itself to directly serve as the reflux for fractionation column 21. Rather, the refrigeration inherent in the cold LNG is used in heat exchanger 13 to generate a liquid reflux stream (stream 54) that contains very little of the C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components that are to be recovered, resulting in efficient rectification in absorbing section 21a of fractionation tower 21 and avoiding the equilibrium limitations of such prior art processes. Second, the partial rectification of distillation vapor stream 50 by reflux stream 55 results in a top reflux stream 54 that is predominantly liquid methane and C2 components and contains very little C3 components and heavier hydrocarbon components. As a result, nearly 100% of the C3 components and substantially all of the heavier hydrocarbon components are recovered in liquid product 51 leaving the bottom of deethanizer 21. Third, the rectification of the column vapors provided by absorbing section 21a allows the majority of the LNG feed to be vaporized before entering deethanizer 21 as stream 41c (with much of the vaporization duty provided by low level utility heat in heat exchanger 14). With less total liquid feeding fractionation column 21, the high level utility heat consumed by reboiler 25 to meet the specification for the bottom liquid product from the deethanizer is minimized.
In the simulation of the
The further heated stream 41d is then supplied to expansion machine 16 in which mechanical energy is extracted from the high pressure feed. The machine 16 expands the vapor substantially isentropically from a pressure of about 1190 psia [8,205 kPa(a)] to a pressure of about 415 psia [2,859 kPa(a)] (the operating pressure of fractionation column 21). The work expansion cools the expanded stream 42a to a temperature of approximately −94° F. [−70° C.]. The typical commercially available expanders are capable of recovering on the order of 80-88% of the work theoretically available in an ideal isentropic expansion. The work recovered is often used to drive a centrifugal compressor (such as item 17) that can be used to re-compress the cold vapor stream (stream 56), for example. The expanded and partially condensed stream 42a is thereafter supplied to fractionation column 21 at an upper mid-column feed point.
For the composition and conditions illustrated in
Expanded stream 42a enters fractionation column 21 at an upper mid-column feed position located in the lower region of the absorbing section of fractionation column 21. The liquid portion of stream 42a comingles with the liquids falling downward from the absorbing section and the combined liquid proceeds downward into the stripping section of deethanizer 21. The vapor portion of expanded stream 42a rises upward through the absorbing section and is contacted with cold liquid falling downward to condense and absorb the C3 components and heavier components.
A liquid stream 49 from deethanizer 21 is withdrawn from the lower region of the absorbing section and is routed to heat exchanger 13 where it is heated as it provides cooling of distillation vapor stream 50 as described earlier. The liquid stream is heated from −90° F. [−68° C.] to −61° F. [−52° C.], partially vaporizing stream 49c before it is returned as a mid-column feed to deethanizer 21, typically in the middle region of the stripping section. Alternatively, the liquid stream 49 may be routed directly without heating to the lower mid-column feed point in the stripping section of deethanizer 21 as shown by dashed line 49a.
A portion of the distillation vapor (stream 50) is withdrawn from the upper region of the stripping section at −15° F. [−26° C.]. This stream is then cooled and partially condensed (stream 50a) in exchanger 13 by heat exchange with LNG stream 41b and liquid stream 49 (if applicable). The partially condensed stream 50a at −85° F. [−65° C.] then combines with overhead vapor stream 48 from deethanizer 21 and the combined stream 57 flows to reflux separator 19 at −95° F. [−71° C.]. (It should be noted that the combining of streams 50a and 48 can occur in the piping upstream of reflux separator 19 as shown in
The operating pressure of reflux separator 19 (406 psia [2,797 kPa(a)]) is maintained slightly below the operating pressure of deethanizer 21. This provides the driving force which causes distillation vapor stream 50 to flow through heat exchanger 13, combine with column overhead vapor stream 48 if appropriate, and thence flow into reflux separator 19 wherein the condensed liquid (stream 53) is separated from any uncondensed vapor (stream 56).
The liquid stream 53 from reflux separator 19 is pumped by pump 20 to a pressure slightly above the operating pressure of deethanizer 21, and the pumped stream 53a is then divided into at least two portions. One portion, stream 54, is supplied as top column feed (reflux) to deethanizer 21. This cold liquid reflux absorbs and condenses the C3 components and heavier components rising in the upper rectification region of the absorbing section of deethanizer 21. The other portion, stream 55, is supplied to deethanizer 21 at a mid-column feed position located in the upper region of the stripping section in substantially the same region where distillation vapor stream 50 is withdrawn, to provide partial rectification of stream 50. The deethanizer overhead vapor (stream 48) exits the top of deethanizer 21 at −98° F. [−72° C.] and is combined with partially condensed stream 50a as described previously. The liquid product stream 51 exits the bottom of the tower at 185° F. [85° C.] and flows to storage or further processing.
The cold vapor stream 56 from separator 19 flows to compressor 17 driven by expansion machine 16 to increase the pressure of stream 56a sufficiently so that it can be totally condensed in heat exchanger 12. Stream 56a exits the compressor at −24° F. [−31° C.] and 718 psia [4,953 kPa(a)] and is cooled to −109° F. [−79° C.] (stream 56b) by heat exchange with the high pressure LNG feed stream 41a as discussed previously. Condensed stream 56b is pumped by pump 26 to a pressure slightly above the sales gas delivery pressure. Pumped stream 56c is then heated from −95° F. [−70° C.] to 40° F. [4° C.] in heat exchanger 27 before flowing to the sales gas pipeline at 1215 psia [8,377 kPa(a)] as residue gas stream 56d.
A summary of stream flow rates and energy consumption for the process illustrated in
A comparison of Tables I and II shows that both the
In accordance with this invention, it is generally advantageous to design the absorbing (rectification) section of the deethanizer to contain multiple theoretical separation stages. However, the benefits of the present invention can be achieved with as few as one theoretical stage, and it is believed that even the equivalent of a fractional theoretical stage may allow achieving these benefits. For instance, all or a part of the condensed liquid (stream 53) leaving reflux separator 19 and all or a part of stream 42a can be combined (such as in the piping to the deethanizer) and if thoroughly intermingled, the vapors and liquids will mix together and separate in accordance with the relative volatilities of the various components of the total combined streams. Such commingling of the two streams shall be considered for the purposes of this invention as constituting an absorbing section.
As described earlier, the distillation vapor stream 50 is partially condensed and the resulting condensate used to absorb valuable C3 components and heavier components from the vapors in stream 42a. However, the present invention is not limited to this embodiment. It may be advantageous, for instance, to treat only a portion of these vapors in this manner, or to use only a portion of the condensate as an absorbent, in cases where other design considerations indicate portions of the vapors or the condensate should bypass the absorbing section of the deethanizer. LNG conditions, plant size, available equipment, or other factors may indicate that elimination of work expansion machine 16 in
In the practice of the present invention, there will necessarily be a slight pressure difference between deethanizer 21 and reflux separator 19 which must be taken into account. If the distillation vapor stream 50 passes through heat exchanger 13 and into reflux separator 19 without any boost in pressure, reflux separator 19 shall necessarily assume an operating pressure slightly below the operating pressure of deethanizer 21. In this case, the liquid stream withdrawn from reflux separator 19 can be pumped to its feed position(s) on deethanizer 21. An alternative is to provide a booster blower for distillation vapor stream 50 to raise the operating pressure in heat exchanger 13 and reflux separator 19 sufficiently so that the liquid stream 53 can be supplied to deethanizer 21 without pumping.
Some circumstances may favor pumping the LNG stream to a higher pressure than that shown in
In some circumstance it may be desirable to bypass some or all of liquid stream 49 around heat exchanger 13. If a partial bypass is desirable, the bypass stream 49a would then be mixed with the outlet stream 49b from exchanger 13 and the combined stream 49c returned to the stripping section of fractionation column 21. The use and distribution of the liquid stream 49 for process heat exchange, the particular arrangement of heat exchangers for LNG stream heating and distillation vapor stream cooling, and the choice of process streams for specific heat exchange services must be evaluated for each particular application.
It will also be recognized that the relative amount of feed found in each branch of the condensed liquid contained in stream 53a that is split between the two column feeds in
The mid-column feed positions depicted in
In
The present invention provides improved recovery of C3 components per amount of utility consumption required to operate the process. It also provides for reduced capital expenditure in that all fractionation can be done in a single column. An improvement in utility consumption required for operating the deethanizer process may appear in the form of reduced power requirements for compression or re-compression, reduced power requirements for pumping, reduced energy requirements for tower reboilers, or a combination thereof. Alternatively, if desired, increased C3 component recovery can be obtained for a fixed utility consumption.
In the examples given for the
While there have been described what are believed to be preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will recognize that other and further modifications may be made thereto, e.g. to adapt the invention to various conditions, types of feed, or other requirements without departing from the spirit of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
The applicants claim the benefits under Title 35, United States Code, Section 119(e) of prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/938,489 which was filed on May 17, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2603310 | Gilmore | Jul 1952 | A |
2880592 | Davison et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2925984 | Kowalski | Feb 1960 | A |
3292380 | Bucklin | Dec 1966 | A |
3524897 | Kniel | Aug 1970 | A |
3724226 | Pachaly | Apr 1973 | A |
3763658 | Gaumer, Jr. et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3837172 | Markbreiter et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4033735 | Swenson | Jul 1977 | A |
4061481 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4065278 | Newton et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4140504 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4157904 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4171964 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4185978 | McGalliard et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4251249 | Gulsby | Feb 1981 | A |
4278457 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4368061 | Mestrallet et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4404008 | Rentler et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4430103 | Gray et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4445916 | Newton | May 1984 | A |
4445917 | Chiu | May 1984 | A |
4453958 | Gulsby et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4519824 | Huebel | May 1985 | A |
4525185 | Newton | Jun 1985 | A |
4545795 | Liu et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4559070 | Sweet | Dec 1985 | A |
4592766 | Kumman et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4596588 | Cook | Jun 1986 | A |
4600421 | Kummann | Jul 1986 | A |
4617039 | Buck | Oct 1986 | A |
4657571 | Gazzi | Apr 1987 | A |
4676812 | Kummann | Jun 1987 | A |
4687499 | Aghili | Aug 1987 | A |
4689063 | Paradowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4690702 | Paradowski et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698081 | Aghili | Oct 1987 | A |
4707170 | Ayres et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710214 | Sharma et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4711651 | Sharma et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4718927 | Bauer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4720294 | Lucadamo et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738699 | Apffel | Apr 1988 | A |
4752312 | Prible | Jun 1988 | A |
4755200 | Liu et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4793841 | Burr | Dec 1988 | A |
4851020 | Montgomery, IV | Jul 1989 | A |
4854955 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869740 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4881960 | Ranke et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4889545 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4895584 | Buck et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
RE33408 | Khan et al. | Oct 1990 | E |
4970867 | Herron et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5114451 | Rambo et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114541 | Bayer | May 1992 | A |
5275005 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291736 | Paradowski | Mar 1994 | A |
5325673 | Durr et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5363655 | Kikkawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365740 | Kikkawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5421165 | Paradowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5537827 | Low et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555748 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566554 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568737 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600969 | Low | Feb 1997 | A |
5615561 | Houshmand et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5651269 | Prevost et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669234 | Houser et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5737940 | Yao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755114 | Foglietta | May 1998 | A |
5755115 | Manley | May 1998 | A |
5771712 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799507 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5881569 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890378 | Rambo et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893274 | Nagelvoort et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5950453 | Bowen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983664 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014869 | Elion et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016665 | Cole et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023942 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053007 | Victory et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062041 | Kikkawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6116050 | Yao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119479 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125653 | Shu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6182469 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6250105 | Kimble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269655 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272882 | Hodges et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308531 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324867 | Fanning et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336344 | O'Brien | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347532 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363744 | Finn et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6367286 | Price | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401486 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6526777 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6564579 | McCartney | May 2003 | B1 |
6604380 | Reddick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6742358 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6889523 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907752 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941771 | Reddick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986266 | Narinsky | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7069743 | Prim | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7155931 | Wilkinson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216507 | Cuellar et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7278281 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7631516 | Cuellar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20040079107 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050066686 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050247078 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268649 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000234 | Cuellar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060032269 | Cuellar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060130521 | Patel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060260355 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260356 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277943 | Yokohata et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283207 | Pitman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001322 | Aikhorin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1535846 | Aug 1968 | FR |
2102931 | Feb 1983 | GB |
1606828 | Oct 1986 | SU |
0188447 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004109180 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005015100 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005035692 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority, or The Declaration (Form PCT/ISA/220), PCT International Search Report (Form PCT/ISA/210) and PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (Form PCT/ISA/237) of International Application No. PCT/US 08/59712. |
Huang et al., “Select the Optimum Extraction Method for LNG Regasification; Varying Energy Compositions of LNG Imports may Require Terminal Operators to Remove C2+ Compounds before Injecting Regasified LNG into Pipelines”, Hydrocarbon ProcessinJL 83, 57-62, Jul. 2004. |
Yang et al., “Cost-Effective Design Reduces C2 and C3 at LNG Receiving Terminals”, Oil & Gas Journal, 50-53, May 26, 2003. |
B.C. Price et al., “LNG Production for Peak Shaving Operations”, Proceedings of the Seventy-eighth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Nashville, Tennessee, Mar. 1-3, 1999, 8 sheets. |
Finn et al., “LNG Technology for Offshore and Mid-scale Plants”, Proceedings of the Seventy-ninth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 13-15, 2003, 23 sheets. |
Kikkawa et al., “Optimize The Power System of Baseload LNG Plant”, Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Convention of The Gas Processors Association, San Antonio, Texas, Mar. 12-14, 2001, 23 sheets. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080282731 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60938489 | May 2007 | US |