This invention relates generally to liquid applicators and particularly to applicators used to dispense paints, inks, stains, coating adhesives, cleaning compounds, and the like, through a valved nib.
Applicators of the type under consideration have been used since the 1950's and up until the present have always used more than four primary components to be effective.
When assembled, the components of a typical valve actuated applicator operate by pushing the nib inwardly by depressing the nib onto a hard surface. Depressing the nib onto such a surface moves the plunger or valve element backwards against spring action and fluid, primarily liquid, flows from container into the nib. When pressure is released the spring returns the plunger to its original position and flow to the nib is cut off. When thus charged with liquid the nib is ready for use. When the supply of liquid to the nib is exhausted the nib must be recharged by depressing it again on the hard surface.
A patent pertinent to the second embodiment is U.S. Pat. No. 3,640,631 issued to Sotir. A distinct improvement of the applicants' second embodiment over the Sotir patent is that in Sotir the entry of the applicator liquid to the nib is primarily by way of a lateral passage 52 into a secondary reservoir and into the end of the nib. One of the disadvantages with the Sotir structure is that the lateral passage is prone to clogging when used with viscous paints or adhesives therefore Sotir is limited to thinner fluids. The present structure, on the other hand, provides an ample supply of ink through an annular area at the end of the nib and also into the nib through channels in the closure structure without the need for a secondary reservoir.
The difference between the current applicator and prior art applicators lies in the number of components necessary to provide a working device, and in the relationship of such components to each other. The prior art applicators require additional and more complicated parts than the present applicator.
This liquid applicator overcomes the disadvantages noted above in a manner not revealed by the known prior art by requiring a smaller number of less complicated applicator parts.
This liquid applicator requires only four components, in addition to the nib, to work effectively. These four components are a closure, a plunger or valve element, a spring and a retainer. When assembled in proper order in a container, which provides the applicator body, the applicator works effectively as a valve to regulate flow from the container to the nib. In addition to the four components and the nib, only a cap is necessary, as an addition, to prevent the applicator from drying out when not in use.
This invention is a liquid applicator comprising a container for dispensable liquid, the container having an open end and a closed end with a valve assembly inserted at the open end. The valve assembly includes the closure interfitting the open end of the container and having a passage extending therethrough and a partition with an opening, the partition dividing the passage into first and second communicating portions; a valve element interfitting the opening, and cooperating with the opening to provide a valve as the valve element moves in said opening, the closure including a retainer at the inner end; a spring disposed between the retainer and the valve element to bias the valve element against inward movement of the valve element. A nib is disposed in sliding relation in the first passage and is engageable with the valve element whereby the valve element is movable by pressure of the nib against the bias of the spring to open the valve and allow liquid to flow into the nib and the valve to close when pressure is released.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide that the valve element has an intermediate tapered portion received within the opening, whereby the flow of liquid is variable.
It is another aspect of this invention to provide that the valve element has a stop engageable by the spring.
It is still another aspect of this invention to provide that the retainer has an opening allowing flow of the applicator liquid from the container therethrough and another aspect to provide that the closure includes a socket at the inner end thereof receiving the retainer in retained relation.
It is yet another aspect of this invention to provide that the first part of the closure passage provides a reservoir for the liquid and also provides a plurality of longitudinal ribs facilitating movement of the nib within said passage.
It is another aspect of this invention to provide that the valve element has a reduced diameter inner end, and to provide that the retainer has a central opening sized to receive the reduced diameter inner end of the valve element in sliding relation to maintain alignment of said valve element.
It is still another aspect of this invention to provide that the valve element has a reduced diameter outer end and a bore defining an annular face for receiving the end of the nib.
It is still another aspect of this invention to provide that the valve element has a reduced diameter outer end received by the first passage to define a reservoir between the closure and the engaged end of the valve element.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a cap adapted to overfit the closure and slidingly engage with the closure to maintain alignment of the cap and inhibit drying out of the nib.
This liquid applicator is simple in construction because of the reduction in component parts, and it is easy to manufacture and use for the same reason.
It is an aspect of this invention to provide a proper fit of the aluminum container and the closure to prevent liquid leaks. Leakage may be due to the extremes of temperature in which the applicator is used and particularly because aluminum of the container and the plastic of the closure have different coefficients of expansion. In order to resolve this problem the relative mass of the closure and the container in contact have been considered. Experiments have shown that an internal pressure applied by the retainer to the closure wall produces beneficial results because it keeps the plastic closure wall closer to the aluminum container wall during the critical thawing time. This is achieved by providing superior engagement. Another aspect of the “proper fit” is to prevent the closure from being pulled out of the container altogether. When the applicator is frozen and then thawed at room temperature pulling the cap out may carry the entire closure with it due to the differential in the coefficient of expansion of plastic and aluminum. Superior engagement is achieved by the relationship between the closure wall thickness and the container wall thickness.
Referring now by reference numerals to the drawings and first to FIG. lit will be understood that the liquid applicator 10 includes a unitarily formed, one-piece closure member 12 formed from hard plastic material such as acetal plastic which interfits the open end of a container 14. The container is a hollow cylinder having an open end 13 and a closed end 15 and is preferably of metal such as aluminum. Acetal plastic is impervious to most fluids and solvents.
The closure 12 includes a passage 26 therethrough having a partition or web 28 dividing the passage into first and second portions 25 and 27 communicating with each other by means of an opening 29. The opening 29 receives the front end of the valve element or plunger 16 in sliding relation and the socketed rear end of the closure 12 is provided with the fixedly attached retainer 22. A spring 20, constituting a bias means, is received on the rear end of the plunger 16 and engages the retainer 22. The front end of the plunger 16 is engaged by the nib 18 to apply pressure to the nib 18 to open the valve. Preferably, the plunger 16 is made of low density polyethylene, a softer material which facilitates an effective seal. The spring 20 may be a coil spring and the pressure may be controlled by varying the number of coils on the spring.
The closure 12, the plunger 16, the spring 20 and the retainer 22 constitute a valve assembly 50 which interfits tightly into the open end 13 of the liquid container 14. The cap 24 may be made of plastic or metal.
More specifically, as shown in
At its front end the closure 12 first passage portion 25 is adapted to receive the nib 18 as a push fit so that it slides within the passage 25 under resistance from the spring 20 against the retainer 22. To this end, the passage 25 is fluted to provide a plurality of longitudinal ribs 36 and recesses 35, as shown in
The plunger 16 is configurated so that it is received in an opening 29 in web 28 extending across the inside of the closure 12. As shown in
As shown in
The cap 24 is configurated to interfit the closure 12 at two longitudinal spaced places. To this end the cap 24 is indented to provide a shoulder 48 extending to the cap end 46, and engaging with the intermediate closure seating portion 38 and a seating portion 54 adapted to overfit the closure forward portion 56.
In order to fully understand the structure of the liquid applicator 10, and particularly the valve action, reference is made to
In both
Turning now to
It may take two or three depressions of the plunger 16 to open and close the valve to ensure that the nib 18 is fully charged and ready for use. The number of depressions is determined by the viscosity of the liquid, the porosity of the nib and will also depend on how long the plunger is depressed. When the nib 18 is discharged of liquid, the valve assembly 50 can again be charged or it can be closed and the cap 24 replaced.
A second embodiment is shown in
Ideally, the closure wall thickness should be no more than 2½ times the thickness of the container wall 14. The thickness of the retainer 122 should ideally be about 0.009″. Also the closure of the present structure provides a unitary one-piece component. It will be understood that some experimentation may be necessary within the scope of the claims hereunto expended.
In view of the above it will be seen that various aspects and features of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained. While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been shown and described, it will be clear to those skilled on the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention in its broader aspects as defined by the claims.
This application is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 11/245,858 filed on Oct. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,541, the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3640631 | Sotir | Feb 1972 | A |
5035524 | Sakurai | Jul 1991 | A |
5082386 | Hironaka et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5749665 | Kato et al. | May 1998 | A |
5888007 | Nicoll et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6817802 | Nishitani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7086799 | Pappageorge et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7182541 | Ziniti et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070201940 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11245858 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11679027 | US |