Liquid buffered GDF-5 formulations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7947649
  • Patent Number
    7,947,649
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 8, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 24, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Improved formulations and methods are provided for stabilizing a solution of bone morphogenetic protein. The compositions comprise an acetate buffered solution of GDF-5 and other excipients wherein the solution has a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3, thereby providing for a biologically isotonic solution having improved stability of the GDF-5 protein during storage, handling, and use.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to liquid formulations of bone morphogenetic proteins for improved stability, handling, and storage. More specifically, the invention relates to liquid formulations comprising GDF-5 in a biologically isotonic acidic solution having a pH of from about 4.0 to about 5.5, having improved protein stability during handling and delivery at body temperatures.


BACKGROUND

GDF-5 is a member of the Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP), which is a subclass of the TGF-β superfamily of proteins. GDF-5 includes several variants and mutants, including mGDF-5 first isolated from the mouse by Lee (U.S. Pat. No. 5,801,014). Other variants include MP52, which is the patented name (WO 95/04819) for the human form of GDF-5, which is also known as hGDF-5 and also as LAP-4 (Triantfilou, et al. Nature Immunology 2, 338-345 (2001)); also CDMP-1, an allelic protein variant of hGDF-5 (WO 96/14335); also rhGDF-5, the recombinant human form manufactured in bacteria (EP 0955313); also rhGDF-5-Ala83, a monomeric variant of rhGDF-5; also BMP-14, a collective term for hGDF-5/CDMP-1 like proteins; also Radotermin, the international non-proprietary name designated by the World Health Organization; also HMW MP52's, high molecular weight protein variants of MP52; also C465A, a monomeric version wherein the cysteine residue responsible for the intermolecular cross-link is substituted with alanine; also other active monomers and single amino acid substitution mutants including N445T, L441 P, R438L, and R438K. For the purposes of this applciation the term “GDF-5” is meant to include all variants and mutants of the GDF-5 protein, and rhGDF-5 is the exemplary member having 119 amino acids.


All members of the BMP family share common structural features including a carboxy terminal active domain and share a highly conserved pattern of cysteine residues that create 3 intramolecular disulfide bonds and one intermolecular disulfide bond. The active form can be either a disulfide-bonded homodimer of a single family member or a heterodimer of two different members (see Massague, et al. Annual Review of Cell Biology 6:957 (1990); Sampath, et al. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:13198 (1990); Celeste et al. PNAS 87:9843-47 (1990); U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,691, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,683). The proper folding of the GDF-5 protein and formation of these disulfide bonds are essential to biological functioning, and misfolding leads to inactive aggregates and cleaved fragments.


The production of BMP's from genetically modified bacteria, and of GDF-5 in particular, utilizes plasmid vectors to transform E. coli to produce monomer GDF-5 protein in high yield (see for example Hotten U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,994 and Makishima U.S. Pat. No. 7,235,527). The monomer is obtained from inclusion bodies, purified, and refolded into homodimers of GDF-5 protein to produce the biologically active dimer of the GDF-5 protein. The steps leading to this utilize various pharmaceutically unacceptable materials to modify the solubility in order to enable the separation and purification of the GDF-5 protein.


The degradation of proteins in general has been well described in the literature, but the storage and solubility of bone morphogenetic proteins, particularly GDF-5 has not been well described. BMP-2 is readily soluble at concentrations greater than 1 mg/ml when the pH is below 6, and above pH 6 the solubility can be increased by the addition of 1 M NaCl, 30% isopropanol, or 0.1 mM heparin (Ruppert, et al Eur J Biochem 237, 295-302 (1996). The solubility of GDF-5 is much more limited than that of BMP-2, and GDF-5 is nearly insoluble in physiological pH ranges and buffers. GDF-5 is only soluble in water at extreme pH (Honda, et al, Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 89(6), 582-589 (2000)). GDF-5 is soluble at an alkaline pH of about 9.5 to 12.0, however proteins degrade quickly under these conditions and thus acidic conditions are used for preparation of GDF-5 protein.


The use of bone morphogenetic proteins has been well described in the case of BMP-2 and the growth of bone. GDF-5 has more activity in other areas of musculoskeletal development than BMP-2, and indeed in other areas of cellular biochemistry and regulation. The use of GDF-5 in these other areas presents fertile ground for potential treatments of various diseases and medical conditions. A major challenge for storage, handling, and delivery to target tissues is the stability of the GDF-5 protein molecule. Bulk GDF-5 protein is typically stored at sub-zero temperatures and lyophilized products are stored at 2-8C to protect the protein from degradation, but liquid formulations are required for many uses, including delivering liquid product in an implantable drug delivery pump.


In the past we have shown that a high amount of excipient, such as 60% trehalose, could be used to protect the GDF-5 protein at body temperature for extended periods of time. These formulas however were not isotonic and must be diluted before reaching the injection site. Biocompatible formulations of the GDF-5 protein present great challenges to obtain reasonable solubility and concurrent stability of the GDF-5 protein. Thus there is a need for improved formulations for the storage, handling, and delivery of GDF-5 protein solutions.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to formulations of buffered isotonic GDF-5 protein solutions having improved storage and handling properties at body temperatures, providing for stability of the GDF-5 protein molecule. A preferred embodiment of the invention includes 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in a 5-10 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.5 -5 with 10% trehalose as an excipient, providing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 2 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 solution in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 3 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose and 0.1% HO-ectoine after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 4 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose and 0.1% ectoine after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 5 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0 with 10% trehalose after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 6 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0 with 10% trehalose and 0.1% GABA after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 7 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0 with 10% trehalose, 0.1% taurine and 0.01% TEA-HCI after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 8 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0 with 10% trehalose, 0.1% betaine, and 0.1% ectoine after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 9 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 10 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 10 shows the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 10 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 0.01% TEA-HCI and 0.1% betaine after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by HPLC.



FIG. 11 shows an HPLC chromatogram depicting the stability of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 10 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5 with 10% trehalose 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by 90% main peak retention.



FIG. 12 shows an HPLC chromatogram depicting the degradation of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM maleate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, as evidenced by <70% main peak retention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

For the purposes of this application the definitions of the following terms will be useful to clearly and concisely point out the subject matter of the claimed invention. The term “Growth and Differentiation Factor 5” (herein referred to as “GDF-5”) as used herein is understood to include all synonyms, variants and mutations of the GDF-5 protein molecule, including, but not limited to GDF-5, mGDF-5, hGDF-5, MP-52, LAP-4, radotermin, CDMP-1, C465A, and rhGDF-5, wherein rhGDF-5 is the exemplary member of the group. It is also understood to include monomeric GDF-5 proteins, which have also been shown to be biologically active.


The term “room temperature”, herein abbreviated as “RT” or “R.T.”, is understood to mean the ambient temperature of an ordinary office or laboratory, being from about 18 to about 25 degrees Celsius. The term “body temperature” as used herein is understood to mean the average body temperature of a mammal, being from about 34 to about 40 degrees Celsius, and generally accepted to be about 37 degrees Celsius for humans.


The term “bulk” as used herein when referring to “bulk protein” or “bulk solution” is understood to mean a purified solution of GDF-5 in from about 1 to about 10 mM HCl and stored at about −80 degrees Celsius, and is equivalent with the terms “stock”, “stock protein”, and “stock solution”.


The term “buffer” is understood to have its common meanings in the literature, that as a noun being an acid and conjugate base pair capable of providing a liquid with the capacity to maintain a stable pH upon the addition of acid or base, and the term “buffer” as a verb is understood to describe the action of maintaining the pH of a solution by the addition of a buffer. Exemplary buffer conjugate bases include, but are not limited to, acetate, lactate, tartarate, maleate, citrate, and combinations thereof, wherein acetate is the exemplary member of the group.


The terms “isotonic”, “isotonicity”, and “biological isotonicity” as used herein have their common meanings in the literature and refer to a solution being or having an osmolarity equivalent to that of human blood plasma, and is about 290 mosm/L with a range of about +/−20 mosm/L.


The term “excipient” as used herein is understood to mean any extra ingredient or additive other than a buffer that is added to a protein composition. Exemplary excipients include trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, glucose, mannitol, TMAO, TEA-HCl, taurine, β-alanine, betaine, ectoine, HO-ectoine, GABA, and combinations thereof.


The term “TMAO” as used herein is understood to mean trimethylamineoxide; the term “TEA-HCl” as used herein is understood to mean triethylaminehydrochloride; the term “GABA” as used herein is understood to mean gamma-amino butyric acid.


The term “tonicity adjuster” as used herein is understood to mean a solute that is added to a protein solution for the purpose of making the solution isotonic. The solute may also have other chemical or biological properties in addition to modifying the tonicity of the solution. Exemplary tonicity adjusters include salts, such as NaCl, and certain carbohydrates, including but not limited to trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, glucose, and mannitol. Note that these tonicity adjusters may also be considered excipients, however not all excipients are useful as tonicity adjusters. The amount of some excipients that would need to be added in order to affect tonicity would create other undesirable effects and thus negate their utility as a tonicity adjuster. However, in very small quantities these other excipient materials provide useful and desirable properties without substantially affecting the tonicity of the solution.


The term “HPLC” as used herein is understood to have its common meaning of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography, also known as High Performance Liquid Chromatography, and also includes the terms “reversed phase HPLC” or “rp-HPLC”.


Since it's discovery and the subsequent development of recombinant human forms, GDF-5 has been stored in a 10 mM HCl solvent system at −80 degrees Celsius to preserve the GDF-5 protein structure. GDF-5 is less soluble than other BMP's, including BMP-2, for which the bulk of the scientific literature is directed to. There are few reports, if any, available on the solubility and stability of GDF-5. The preparation and isolation of GDF-5 monomer protein and the subsequent refolding into dimer presents a separate set of issues and problems than that of the handling and storage of the bioactive dimer. Working with the mature dimer GDF-5 protein in biocompatible formulations presents a different set of problems, and the literature yields very little physicochemical information regarding the solubility and stability of the GDF-5 dimer protein.


The broad spectrum of activity of GDF-5 in musculoskeletal development and also the expression of GDF-5 receptors in various tissues presents significant opportunities for therapies and treatment. One major drawback to using GDF-5 for treatment is the fragile nature of the protein. We have investigated the use of a number of different buffer systems and excipients in order to improve the stability of GDF-5 protein solutions during storage, handling, and delivery, and herein describe useful formulations for working with this protein.


In the past we have shown that a high amount of excipient, such as 60% trehalose, could be used to protect the GDF-5 protein at body temperature for extended periods of time. These formulas however were not isotonic, and required dilution before use. Additionally, these solutions were quite viscous and were potentially problematic to handle.


We undertook several studies of various GDF-5 solutions to investigate buffer systems and excipients for the improved storage and handling of GDF-5 protein solutions having biological isotonicity and stability, particularly at body temperature. The stability of the GDF-5 protein was determined by reversed phase HPLC (herein referred to simply as “HPLC”), and the percent retention of the main peak was used as a measure of the stability or degradation of the GDF-5 protein. Our past results have shown that this is a reliable method of determining the stability of the GDF-5 protein molecule, and degradation of the GDF-5 protein is readily observed by the reduction of the main peak and the appearance of extraneous peaks due to oxidation, deamidation, aggregation, cleavage and fragmentation. These results were also confirmed in the present experiments.


For example, FIG. 11 shows an HPLC chromatogram of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 10 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0 after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, showing 90% main peak retention and also the presence of minor additional peaks. In contrast, FIG. 12 shows the degradation of 0.1 mg/ml rhGDF-5 in 5 mM maleate buffer solution at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius, showing only 66% main peak retention and the presence of additional peaks. We also evaluated the solutions based on the visual clarity of the solutions, with a hazy or cloudy solution being evidence of poor solubility and/or aggregation of the GDF-5 protein.


Numerous compounds have been shown to be useful in other protein formulations, including buffer systems of acetate, lactate, maleate, citrate, succinate, phosphate, and tartrate, and other excipients such as trehalose, mannitol, sucrose, raffinose, trimethylamine oxide, trimethylamine hydrochloride, triethylamine hydrochloride, beta-alanine, alanine, glycine, taurine, betaine, ectoine, HO-ectoine, L-proline, potassium aspartate, sodium aspartate, heat shock protein, dextran, cyclodextrans, glycine, arginine, PEGs, pluronics, lipids, phospholipids, diacylglyecerols, vitamin E-acetate, and PEG-vitamin E succinate. However, there is no known evidence or literature of the use or benefit of these excipients with GDF-5.


Our experiments were designed to be isotonic solutions with the goal of still maintaining the solubility and stability of the GDF-5 protein molecule. A GDF-5 protein concentration of 0.1 mg/ml was used for all experiments. The results showed that a 5 mM acetate buffer solution at pH 4.5 could be used to maintain a clear liquid that showed approximately 90% retention (stability) of the GDF-5 protein HPLC main peak after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius (see FIG. 1).


The addition of other excipients did not enhance or detract from the GDF-5 protein stability under the experimental conditions studied, but these additional excipients may provide other benefits under other conditions. Thus, the addition of up to 0.2%, or possibly even up to about 0.5% of these other excipients may have little affect on the stability of the protein under the present study conditions, but may enhance the solubility or stability of the protein under other conditions. Increasing the pH of the acetate buffer to 5.0 did not detract from the stability of the GDF-5 protein (see table 2). Thus, a formulation of 5 mM acetate buffer at a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3 with 10% trehalose added to adjust the tonicity and one or more excipients at 0.1 wt. % of taurine, betaine, b-alanine, TMAO, GABA, ectoine, HO-ectoine, 0.01 wt. % of TMAO or TEA-HCl, and various combinations thereof provided for protection of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius (See table 1 &2, and also FIGS. 1-8).


We then tested a similar series of formulations and excipients at pH 5.5, however all of these samples were hazy, indicating poor solubility and/or aggregation of the GDF-5 protein (see table 3). No HPLC scans were performed on these samples.


We also tested the stability of the 0.1 mg/ml GDF-5 protein solution in several 5 mM glycine-HCl buffers ranging from pH 3.9 to 5.0. The samples were tested with and without 10% trehalose to adjust the tonicity, and also with various combinations of the excipients taurine, betaine, b-alanine, and TEA-HCl. All of these samples yielded hazy solutions (see table 4), and were not further tested by HPLC. Similarly, we also tested the stability of the 0.1 mg/ml GDF-5 protein solution in other buffer systems, including a 5 mM citrate buffer at pH 4.4 with 10% trehalose, a 0.25 mM HCl solution at pH 3.5 with 10% trehalose, and a 0.25 mM HCl solution at pH 3.5 without trehalose. All of these solutions were also hazy, indicating poor solubility and/or aggregation of the GDF-5 protein, and no HPLC scans were performed on these samples (see table 4). Thus, it is surprising that an acetate buffer system at higher pH can provide superior solubility and protection of the GDF-5 protein molecule than other commonly known buffers used for biocompatible formulations at a lower pH, when lower pH is known to enhance the stability of GDF-5.


We then further tested the stability of the 0.1 mg/ml GDF-5 protein solution in a 10 mM acetate buffer system at pH 4.5 and also at pH 5.0 with selected combinations of excipients. All of these solutions were clear, and subsequent testing after storage at 37 degrees Celsius showed that these formulations afforded protection of the GDF-5 protein molecule, as evidenced by retention of approximately 85% of the main peak after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius (see tables 5 & 6). Further testing in 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.0 with 10% sucrose instead of trehalose added as a tonicity adjuster, and with various other excipients added also gave positive results, yielding nearly 90% retention of the main peak by HPLC (see table 7).


Although many of the excipients and combinations of excipients tested did not exhibit superior results under the study conditions of time, temperature, pH, and osmolality tested, they also did not exhibit detrimental effects upon the GDF-5 protein stability. Thus, they may show benefits in other systems, methods, or conditions, such as in a specific biological tissue, organ, or cell type, or over a longer time period or at other temperatures.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a formulation of GDF-5 protein in a biocompatible buffer system that provides for improved protein stability during handling and storage at body temperature, as evidenced by the retention of at least 80% of the HPLC main peak. It is another object of the present invention to provide an isotonic solution of GDF-5 protein that is stable during storage and handling at body temperature, as evidenced by the retention of at least 80% of the HPLC main peak. It is another object of the present invention to provide an isotonic solution of GDF-5 protein having an acetate buffer with a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3, and further having 10 weight percent of a tonicity adjuster selected from the group consisting of trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, glucose, mannitol, and combinations thereof, that is stable during storage and handling at body temperature, as evidenced by the retention of at least 80% of the HPLC main peak.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of preserving a solution of GDF-5 protein by providing an acetate buffered solvent system having biological isotonicity and a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3, wherein the GDF-5 protein is stabilized during handling and storage at body temperature up to and including 37 degrees Celsius for up to 32 days, as evidenced by the retention of at least 80% of the HPLC main peak.


The following examples are meant only to be illustrative in nature of the present invention, and not to be limiting in scope. One skilled in the art would easily conceive of other embodiments that would be considered within the scope of the present invention.


EXAMPLE 1

Bulk frozen rhGDF-5 protein solution was thawed overnight. A portion of the stock solution was used in a 5 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.5 and tested with 10% trehalose to adjust the tonicity of the solution to be isotonic and various other excipients to evaluate the stability of the GDF-5 protein as evidenced by the clarity of the solution and by HPLC analysis of the main peak. Data were collected after 5, 11, 22, and 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius. Control samples having buffer only and buffer plus 10% trehalose were included in the experiment. The results are shown below in table 1. Surprisingly, the buffer alone provided nearly equivalent protection of the GDF-5 protein as compared with the other samples. None of the other excipients tested showed any noticeable improvement or reduction of the stability of the GDF-5 protein. FIG. 1 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the control sample with acetate buffer at pH 4.5 alone, showing approximately 90% retention (stability) of the GDF-5 protein after 5,11,22, and 32 days at 37 degrees Celsius. FIG. 2 shows a similar graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample with acetate buffer at pH 4.5 plus 10% trehalose, also showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days at 37 degrees Celsius. FIGS. 3 and 4 show similar graphs of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the samples with 10% trehalose plus 0.1% HO-ectoine or 0.1% ectoine, respectively, also showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days at 37 degrees Celsius. See table 1 below for a complete listing of the various combinations of excipients tested and the results obtained. Note that all of the values are nearly equivalent, showing that the acetate buffer at pH 4.5 is able to maintain the stability of the GDF-5 protein at about 90%, with or without the addition of other excipients.









TABLE 1







Data showing the stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer


at pH 4.5, also tested with 10% trehalose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak















Sample ID
Other Excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 5
Day 11
Day 22
Day 32


















RR303LN-73-
0.01% TMAO
4.4
Clear
96.35
94.56
93.58
91.90
89.25


56










RR303LN-73-
0.1% ectoine
4.3
Clear
95.83
94.68
93.41
91.73
88.67


57










RR303LN-73-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% ectoine
4.4
Clear
95.92
95.88
93.49
91.87
88.98


58










RR303LN-73-
0.1% HO-ectoine
4.3
Clear
96.27
94.42
93.42
91.54
89.35


59










RR303LN-73-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% HO-
4.4
Clear
96.16
95.68
93.59
91.64
89.32


60
ectoine









RR303LN-73-
0.1% taurine/0.1% betaine
4.3
Clear
96.07
94.39
93.21
91.15
89.68


61










RR303LN-73-
0.1% taurine/0.1% ectoine
4.3
Clear
95.53
94.65
92.96
90.95
88.96


62










RR303LN-73-
0.15 taurine/0.1% HO-
4.3
Clear
95.82
94.73
93.33
91.25
89.00


63
ectoine









RR303LN-73-
0.1% taurine/0.01% TEA-HCl
4.3
Clear
95.81
94.72
93.11
91.39
89.51


64










RR303LN-73-
0.1% taurine/0.1% b-alanine
4.6
Clear
96.36
95.00
93.54
91.36
89.30


65










RR303LN-73-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% taurine
4.4
Clear
95.21
94.42
93.15
91.56
89.09


66










RR303LN-73-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
4.6
Clear
96.14
94.76
93.51
91.73
89.34


67
alanine









RR303LN-73-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.3
Clear
95.23
93.70
93.30
91.84
89.50


68
betaine









RR303LN-73-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1% betaine
4.6
Clear
96.49
94.18
93.17
91.67
89.07


69










RR303LN-73-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1% ectoine
4.6
Clear
96.12
94.47
93.34
91.31
88.54


70










RR303LN-73-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1% HO-
4.6
Clear
95.63
95.05
93.59
91.55
89.23


71
ectoine









RR303LN-73-
0.1% betaine/0.1% ectoine
4.3
Clear
95.72
94.01
93.18
91.08
88.55


72










RR303LN-73-

10% trehalose only

4.3
Clear
96.09
94.93
93.57
91.89
89.26


73










RR303LN-73-
No trehalose or other
4.3
Clear
95.52
94.33
93.51
92.06
89.09


74
excipients









EXAMPLE 2

In this experiment rhGDF-5 was also formulated at approximately 0.1 mg/mL in 5 mM acetate buffer, but at pH 5.0 instead of pH 4.5 as in example 1. 10% trehalose was added to adjust the tonicity, and various other excipients were added as indicated in table 2. These formulations were also stable at 37 degrees Celsius for 32 days as shown in table 2. FIG. 5 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having 5 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.0 and 10% trehalose, showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius. FIG. 6 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having acetate buffer at pH 5.0 and 10% trehalose with 0.1% GABA, also showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius. FIG. 7 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having acetate buffer at pH 5.0 and 10% trehalose with 0.1% taurine and 0.01% TEA-HCl, also showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius. FIG. 8 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having acetate buffer at pH 5.0 with 10% trehalose, 0.1% betaine, and 0.1% ectoine, also showing approximately 90% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius.









TABLE 2







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 5 mM Acetate buffer at pH 5.0, also


tested with 10% trehalose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak















Sample ID
Other excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 6
Day 14
Day 21
Day 34


















RR303LN-
0.01% TMAO
4.9
Clear
96.43
96.14
95.45
93.15
92.35


76-75










RR303LN-
0.1% ectoine
4.8
Clear
96.42
95.50
94.59
93.13
90.15


76-76










RR303LN-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% ectoine
5.0
Clear
95.86
95.50
94.68
92.97
91.04


76-77










RR303LN-
0.1% GABA
5.1
Clear
96.17
95.00
94.36
92.57
91.09


76-78










RR303LN-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% GABA
5.2
Clear
95.41
95.84
94.30
93.09
91.21


76-79










RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.1% betaine
4.8
Clear
95.63
95.95
94.16
92.50
90.28


76-80










RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.1% ectoine
4.9
Clear
95.94
95.93
94.15
92.34
90.22


76-81










RR303LN-
0.15 taurine/0.1% GABA
5.1
Clear
96.34
95.63
94.74
92.02
91.01


76-82










RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.01% TEA-
4.8
Clear
95.59
95.22
93.81
91.56
90.15


76-83
HCl









RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.1% b-
5.0
Clear
95.85
94.95
94.38
91.18
90.33


76-84
alanine









RR303LN-
0.01% TMAO/0.1% taurine
4.9
Clear
95.81
94.14
93.96
91.84
91.09


76-85










RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
5.0
Clear
95.44
96.16
93.80
91.90
90.18


76-86
alanine









RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.8
Clear
95.99
95.82
93.54
91.88
90.47


76-87
betaine









RR303LN-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1%
5.0
Clear
95.58
95.72
94.49
91.61
90.74


76-88
betaine









RR303LN-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1%
5.0
Clear
95.27
95.46
94.50
92.39
90.39


76-89
ectoine









RR303LN-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1%
5.2
Clear
95.48
95.88
93.89
91.51
91.24


76-90
GABA









RR303LN-
0.1% betaine/0.1% ectoine
4.8
Clear
95.93
95.16
94.27
92.98
90.44


76-91










RR303LN-
10% trehalose only
4.8
Clear
95.90
96.33
93.60
91.61
90.74


76-92









EXAMPLE 3

Similar to examples 1 and 2, rhGDF-5 was formulated at 0.1 mg/mL in 5 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.5 with 10% trehalose and other excipients, and all of these protein solutions all hazy (see table 3). Additionally, 5 mM citrate buffer at pH 4.5, glycine-HCl buffer at pH 4.5, and 0.25 mM HCl solvents were also evaluated. These formulations were also observed to be hazy, as shown in table 4.









TABLE 3







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 5 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.5,


and also with 10% trehalose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak














Sample ID
Other Excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 11
Day 20
Day 32





RR303LN-79-
10% trehalose only
5.3
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


98









RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/0.1% betaine
5.3
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


99









RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/0.1% b-alanine
5.4
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


100









RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
5.4
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


101
alanine








RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
5.3
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


102
betaine









EXAMPLE 4

rhGDF-5 was formulated at 0.1 mg/mL in glycine and citrate buffers at various pH with 10% trehalose and other excipients, and all of these protein solutions were hazy (see table 4).









TABLE 4







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in various buffers with 10% trehalose and


other excipients.










Other
HPLC Analysis, % main peak















Sample ID
Excipients
pH
Buffer
Clarity
Time 0
Day 11
Day 20
Day 32





RR303LN-79-
10% trehalose only
3.9
5 mM gly-HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


108










RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/
5.0
5 mM gly-HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


109
0.1% betaine









RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/
5.0
5 mM gly-HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


110
0.1% b-alanine









RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/
4.9
5 mM gly-HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


111
0.1% b-alanine









RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/
3.9
5 mM gly-HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


112
0.1% betaine









RR303LN-79-
10% trehalose only
4.4
5 mM Citrate
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


114










RR303LN-79-
10% trehalose only
3.5
0.25 mM HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


115










RR303LN-79-
No trehalose
3.5
0.25 mM HCl
Hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


116










RR303LN-90-
10% trehalose only
4.45
5 mM tartrate
hazy
NA
NA
NA
NA


117










RR303LN-90-
10% trehalose only
4.32
5 mM lactate
clear
95.88
93.15
91.35
89.52


119










RR303LN-90-
10% trehalose only
3.85
5 mM maleate
clear
95.62
72.07
66.33
66.35


120









EXAMPLE 5

Similar to examples 1 and 2, rhGDF-5 was formulated at 0.1 mg/mL, but using 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.5 for example 5. The samples had 10% trehalose added to adjust the tonicity and were tested with various other excipients. These formulations were also stable at 37 degrees Celsius for 32 days as shown in table 5. FIG. 9 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.5 and 10% trehalose, showing approximately 87% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius. FIG. 10 shows a graph of the HPLC main peak % and the % recovery of concentration of the sample having 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 4.5 with 0.01% TEA-HCl and 0.1% betaine, also showing approximately 87% retention of the GDF-5 protein after 32 days storage at 37 degrees Celsius.









TABLE 5







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 10 mM Acetate buffer


at pH 4.5 with 10% trehalose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak














Sample ID
Other Excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 11
Day 20
Day 32





RR303LN-79-
10% trehalose only
4.4
Clear
95.27
93.00
91.18
87.38


103









RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/0.1% betaine
4.4
Clear
95.34
92.92
90.96
86.27


104









RR303LN-79-
0.1% taurine/0.1% b-
4.5
Clear
95.30
93.12
91.42
85.97


105
alanine








RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
4.5
Clear
94.97
94.32
91.19
86.41


106
alanine








RR303LN-79-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.3
Clear
95.34
93.00
91.74
87.27


107
betaine









EXAMPLE 6

Similar to example 5, rhGDF-5 was formulated at 0.1 mg/mL in 10 mM acetate buffer, but at pH 5.0 for example 6. The samples had 10% trehalose added to adjust the tonicity and were tested with various other excipients. These formulations were also stable at 37 degrees Celsius for 32 days as shown in table 6.









TABLE 6







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 10 mM Acetate buffer at pH 5.0, also


tested with 10% trehalose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak














Sample ID
Other excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 10
Day 20
Day 32

















RR303LN-
10% trehalose only
4.97
Clear
96.15
93.66
91.63
89.26


90-118









RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.01% TEA-
4.97
Clear
96.00
93.70
91.84
89.18


90-122
HCl








RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.1% b-
5.04
Clear
95.64
93.31
91.30
88.40


90-123
alanine








RR303LN-
0.15 taurine/0.1% betaine
4.96
Clear
96.13
93.68
91.10
88.86


90-124









RR303LN-
0.1% taurine/0.1% ectoine
4.95
Clear
95.87
93.62
91.96
89.54


90-125









RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
5.01
Clear
96.02
93.51
91.65
88.79


90-126
alanine








RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.91
Clear
94.27
93.84
91.26
89.38


90-127
betaine








RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.91
Clear
95.81
92.85
91.72
89.50


90-128
ectoine








RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1%
4.98
Clear
95.64
93.54
91.50
89.14


90-129
betaine








RR303LN-
0.1% b-alanine/0.1%
4.98
Clear
95.37
93.52
91.49
88.96


90-130
ectoine








RR303LN-
0.1% ectoine
4.89
Clear
95.83
93.97
91.31
89.87


90-131









RR303LN-
0.1% betaine
4.89
Clear
95.88
94.09
91.68
89.44


90-132









RR303LN-
0.1% b-alanine
4.99
Clear
96.04
93.77
91.47
89.16


90-133









EXAMPLE 7

Similar to example 6, rhGDF-5 was formulated at 0.1 mg/mL in 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.0. The samples in example 7 had 10% sucrose instead of trehalose added to adjust the tonicity. All of the samples yielded clear solutions and approximately 90% retention of the main peak by HPLC (see table 7).









TABLE 7







Stability of 0.1 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 10 mM acetate buffer at pH 5.0, with


10% sucrose and other excipients.









HPLC Analysis, % main peak














Sample ID
Other excipients
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 10
Day 20
Day 32

















RR303LN-
10% sucrose only
4.98
Clear
95.87
93.47
91.83
88.74


90-121









RR303LN-
0.1% taurine
4.95
Clear
95.73
94.59
91.69
89.12


90-134









RR303LN-
0.1% ectoine
4.94
Clear
95.69
94.11
92.03
89.22


90-135









RR303LN-
0.01% TEA-HCl/0.1% b-
5.01
Clear
95.92
94.40
91.46
89.00


90-136
alanine









EXAMPLE 8

Similar to Example 2, rhGDF-5 formulations were prepared at a higher concentration of 0.2 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 5 mM or 10 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5 with 10% trehalose. The formulations were tested under different storage temperatures including 37, 40 and 5° C. The stability results are presented in Table 8.









TABLE 8







Stability of 0.2 mg/mL rhGDF-5 in 5 mM or 10 mM acetate buffer with


10% trehalose at various storage temperatures










HPLC Analysis
SEC



% main peak
% aggregates




















Storage





Day
7
Day
7


Sample ID
Acetate buffer, pH 5
temp
pH
Clarity
Time 0
Day 13
Day 20
34
months
34
months





RR303LN-
 5 mM sodium acetate
37° C.
5.00
Clear
95..01
93.40
92.02
89.48

2.33



108G













RR303LN-
10 mM sodium
37° C.
4.98
Clear
95.46
93.01
91.56
89.09

2.07



108J
acetate












RR303LN-
 5 mM sodium acetate
40° C.
5.03
Clear
95.01
92.89
89.89
86.43

2.79



108G













RR303LN-
10 mM sodium
40° C.
4.93
Clear
95.46
92.18
89.77
85.47

2.33



108J
acetate












RR303LN-
 5 mM sodium acetate
 5° C.
4.99
Clear
95.01


95.51
92.45
0.49
0.61


108G













RR303LN-
10 mM sodium
 5° C.
4.96
Clear
95.46


95.66
92.53
0.36
0.49


108J
acetate









All of the samples yielded clear solutions. The samples stored at 37° C. for 34 days still had approximately 90% retention of the rHGDF-5 protein as determined by HPLC. The rHGDF-5 protein recovery from the 40° C. was slightly lower at approximately 85% recovery. No significant changes were observed with the 5° C. samples for at least 7 months.


The results indicate that rhGDF-5 formulated in acetate buffer with or without other excipients could be stored at 5° C. for long term storage. The formulation could be delivered under the body temperature for over a month. The isotonic liquid rhGDF-5 formulation is more stable at high temperatures, 5 and 37° C. than has been shown previously.

Claims
  • 1. A composition consisting essentially of a 0.1 to 0.2 mg/mL GDF-5 protein solution in a 5 to 10 mM acetate buffer having a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1 further comprising one or more excipients selected from the group consisting of trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, glucose, mannitol, and combinations thereof.
  • 3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the solution is isotonic.
  • 4. The composition of claim 2 wherein the excipient is trehalose.
  • 5. The composition of claim 2 wherein the excipient is sucrose.
  • 6. The composition of claim 2 further comprising an excipient selected from the group consisting of TMAO, TEA-HCI, taurine, β-alanine, betaine, ectoine, HO-ectoine, GABA, and combinations thereof.
  • 7. The composition of claim 6 wherein the excipient is present in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 0.5 weight percent.
  • 8. A method of stabilizing a solution of GDF-5 protein comprising the steps of: a. providing a sample of a 0.1 to 0.2 mg/mL GDF-5 protein, andb. adding a 5 to 10 mM acetate buffer having a pH of from about 4.2 to about 5.3, thereby providing for a stabilized solution of GDF-5.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of adding one or more excipients selected from the group consisting of trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, glucose, mannitol, and combinations thereof.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the excipient is added in an amount sufficient to render the protein solution isotonic.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the excipient is trehalose.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the excipient is sucrose.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, further comprising the step of adding one or more excipients selected from the group consisting of TMAO, TEA-HCl, taurine, β-alanine, betaine, ectoine, HO-ectoine, GABA, and combinations thereof.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the excipient is present in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 0.5 weight percent.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application, is a non-provisional filing of a provisional application U.S. Pat. App. No. 61/044,518, filed on Apr. 14, 2008.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
2931802 Touey Apr 1960 A
4120810 Palmer Oct 1978 A
4891319 Roser Jan 1990 A
5011691 Oppermann et al. Apr 1991 A
5013649 Wang May 1991 A
5202311 Folkman et al. Apr 1993 A
5231169 Constantz Jul 1993 A
5266683 Oppermann et al. Nov 1993 A
5318898 Israel Jun 1994 A
5385887 Yim Jan 1995 A
5411941 Grinna May 1995 A
5455231 Constantz Oct 1995 A
5516654 Israel May 1996 A
5658882 Celeste Aug 1997 A
5747058 Tipton May 1998 A
5770700 Webb et al. Jun 1998 A
5776193 Kwan Jul 1998 A
5801014 Lee Sep 1998 A
5804557 Cleland Sep 1998 A
5866165 Liu Feb 1999 A
5955448 Colaco Sep 1999 A
5968542 Tipton Oct 1999 A
5972385 Liu Oct 1999 A
5985320 Edwards Nov 1999 A
6051558 Burns Apr 2000 A
6071428 Franks Jun 2000 A
6165981 Flaa Dec 2000 A
6171584 Hotten et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171586 Lam Jan 2001 B1
6187742 Wozney Feb 2001 B1
6207718 Papadimitriou Mar 2001 B1
6281195 Rueger Aug 2001 B1
6284872 Celeste Sep 2001 B1
6288043 Spiro et al. Sep 2001 B1
6340369 Ferree Jan 2002 B1
6344058 Ferree Feb 2002 B1
6352557 Ferree Mar 2002 B1
6407060 Charette et al. Jun 2002 B1
6419702 Ferree Jul 2002 B1
6454804 Ferree Sep 2002 B1
6551801 Andou et al. Apr 2003 B1
6645247 Ferree Nov 2003 B2
6648918 Ferree Nov 2003 B2
6648919 Ferree Nov 2003 B2
6648920 Ferree Nov 2003 B2
6656492 Kajiyama Dec 2003 B2
RE38385 Franks et al. Jan 2004 E
6685695 Ferree Feb 2004 B2
6719968 Celeste Apr 2004 B2
6723170 Ohashi Apr 2004 B2
6755863 Ferree Jun 2004 B2
6764994 Hotten et al. Jul 2004 B1
6780324 Le Garrec Aug 2004 B2
6911411 Cox Jun 2005 B2
6936582 Charette Aug 2005 B1
6991790 Lam Jan 2006 B1
6992065 Okumu Jan 2006 B2
7060268 Andya et al. Jun 2006 B2
RE39497 Franks et al. Feb 2007 E
7235527 Makishima et al. Jun 2007 B2
7318840 McKay Jan 2008 B2
7323445 Zhang Jan 2008 B2
7375077 Mao May 2008 B2
7435260 Ferree Oct 2008 B2
7572440 Vukicevic Aug 2009 B2
7678764 Garigapati Mar 2010 B2
20010024823 Vukicevic Sep 2001 A1
20020032155 Ferree Mar 2002 A1
20020128718 Ferree Sep 2002 A1
20020165542 Ferree Nov 2002 A1
20020173770 Flory Nov 2002 A1
20030026788 Ferree Feb 2003 A1
20030185812 Ferree Oct 2003 A1
20030192554 Ferree Oct 2003 A1
20040022771 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040024471 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040028733 Tracy et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040132653 Ichikawa Jul 2004 A1
20040146923 Celeste Jul 2004 A1
20040197324 Liu Oct 2004 A1
20050069571 Slivka Mar 2005 A1
20050119754 Trieu Jun 2005 A1
20050191248 Hunter Sep 2005 A1
20060024346 Brody et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060088565 Kohnert et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060121113 Bartholomaeus Jun 2006 A1
20060223120 Kim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060286171 Zhou Dec 2006 A1
20060286289 Prajapati Dec 2006 A1
20060287676 Prajapati Dec 2006 A1
20070053871 Li Mar 2007 A1
20070098756 Behnam May 2007 A1
20070172479 Warne Jul 2007 A1
20070178159 Chen Aug 2007 A1
20080098614 Tchessalov May 2008 A1
20080147077 Garigapati Jun 2008 A1
20080234727 Garigapati Sep 2008 A1
20080311078 Gokarn Dec 2008 A1
20090004048 Elliott Jan 2009 A1
20090030483 Risi Jan 2009 A1
20090043078 Daniel Feb 2009 A1
20090048412 Soula Feb 2009 A1
20090060976 Rueger Mar 2009 A1
20090099089 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090286764 Kipp Nov 2009 A1
20090291062 Fraunhofer Nov 2009 A1
20100015230 Ron Jan 2010 A1
20100041870 Tchessalov Feb 2010 A1
20100130730 Garigapati May 2010 A1
20100144631 Ron Jun 2010 A1
20100255100 Margolin Oct 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (69)
Number Date Country
0955313 Nov 1999 EP
957943 May 2003 EP
1350525 Oct 2003 EP
1462126 Sep 2004 EP
1448246 Aug 2005 EP
1274459 Nov 2005 EP
1604693 Dec 2005 EP
1604963 Dec 2005 EP
955313 May 2006 EP
1915986 Apr 2008 EP
1932519 Jun 2008 EP
957943 Nov 2008 EP
WO8800205 Jan 1988 WO
WO9011366 Oct 1990 WO
WO9118098 Nov 1991 WO
WO9200382 Jan 1992 WO
WO9309229 May 1993 WO
WO9316099 Aug 1993 WO
WO9410203 May 1994 WO
WO9415949 Jul 1994 WO
WO9415965 Jul 1994 WO
WO9415966 Jul 1994 WO
WO9421681 Sep 1994 WO
WO9426892 Nov 1994 WO
WO9426893 Nov 1994 WO
WO9501801 Jan 1995 WO
WO9504819 Feb 1995 WO
WO9504819 Feb 1995 WO
WO9510539 Apr 1995 WO
WO9510802 Apr 1995 WO
WO9516035 Jun 1995 WO
WO9533830 Dec 1995 WO
WO9601316 Jan 1996 WO
WO9601845 Jan 1996 WO
WO9614335 May 1996 WO
WO9636710 Nov 1996 WO
WO0178683 Oct 2001 WO
WO03000282 Jan 2003 WO
WO03030923 Apr 2003 WO
WO03043673 May 2003 WO
WO03066120 Aug 2003 WO
WO2004037265 May 2004 WO
WO2004052336 Jun 2004 WO
WO2005060989 Jul 2005 WO
WO2005100399 Oct 2005 WO
WO2005107765 Nov 2005 WO
WO2005115438 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006138099 Dec 2006 WO
WO2006138181 Dec 2006 WO
WO2007025441 Mar 2007 WO
WO2006138099 Oct 2007 WO
WO2008009419 Jan 2008 WO
WO2008045498 Apr 2008 WO
WO2008049588 May 2008 WO
WO2008079672 Jul 2008 WO
WO2008082563 Jul 2008 WO
WO2008099190 Aug 2008 WO
WO2008099198 Aug 2008 WO
WO2008082563 Nov 2008 WO
WO2008143867 Nov 2008 WO
WO2008079672 Dec 2008 WO
WO2009006097 Jan 2009 WO
WO2008099198 Jan 2009 WO
WO2009006097 Jan 2009 WO
WO2009006301 Jan 2009 WO
WO2009015736 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009016131 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009016333 Feb 2009 WO
WO2009020744 Feb 2009 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090259023 A1 Oct 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61044518 Apr 2008 US