This description relates to method and system for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analyses of biological analytes such as proteins and/or peptides, and more particularly to data dependent nano-LC/MS acquisitions.
Liquid chromatography (LC) is a well-established analytical technique for separating components of a fluidic mixture for subsequent analysis and/or identification, in which a column, microfluidic chip-based channel, or tube is packed with a stationary phase material that typically is a finely divided solid or gel such as small particles with diameter of a few microns. The small particle size provides a large surface area that can be modified with various chemistries creating a stationary phase. A liquid eluent is pumped through the liquid chromatographic column (“LC column”) at a desired flow rate based on the column dimensions and particle size. This liquid eluent is sometimes referred to as the mobile phase. The sample to be analyzed is introduced (e.g., injected) in a small volume into the stream of the mobile phase prior to the LC column. The analytes in the sample are retarded by specific chemical and/or physical interactions with the stationary phase as they traverse the length of the column. The amount of retardation depends on the nature of the analyte, stationary phase and mobile phase composition. The time at which a specific analyte elutes or comes out of the end of the column is called the retention time or elution time and can be a reasonably identifying characteristic of a given analyte especially when combined with other analyzing characteristics such as the accurate mass of a given analyte. Or in other words, the analytes interact with the stationary phase based on the partition coefficients for each of the analytes. The partition coefficient is defined as the ratio of the time an analyte spends interacting with the stationary phase to the time spent interacting with the mobile phase. The longer an analyte interacts with the stationary phase, the higher the partition coefficient and the longer the analyte is retained on the LC column. An isocratic flow in LC describes a mobile phase of a constant composition. In contrast to this is the so called “gradient elution”, which is a separation where the mobile phase composition changes during a separation process. For example, a 20-minute gradient starts from 10% MeOH and ends up with 30% MeOH within 20 minutes.
Detection of analytes separated on an LC or nanoLC column can be accomplished by use of a variety of different detectors. Spectroscopic detectors rely on a change in refractive index, ultraviolet and/or visible light absorption, or fluorescence after excitation with a suitable wavelength to detect the separated components. Additionally, the separated components may be passed from the liquid chromatographic column into other types of analytical instruments for further analysis, e.g., liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS or LC-MS) separates compounds chromatographically before they are introduced to the ion source of a mass spectrometer.
The purpose of the LC column is to separate analytes such that a unique response (e.g., a UV absorption peak) for each analyte from a chosen detector can be acquired for a quantitative or qualitative measurement. The ability of a LC column to generate a separation is determined by the dimensions of the column and the particle size supporting the stationary phase. The retention time of an analyte can be adjusted by varying the mobile phase composition and the partition coefficient for an analyte. Increases in chromatographic separation can be achieved via a reduction in the LC column diameter, increasing LC column length and/or a reduction of stationary phase particle dimensions.
Mass spectrometry (“MS” or “mass-spec”) is an analytical technique used to measure the mass-to-charge ratio of gas phase ions. This is achieved by ionizing the sample and separating ions of differing masses and recording their relative abundance by measuring intensities of ion flux. A typical mass spectrometer comprises three parts: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector system. The ion source is the part of the mass spectrometer that ionizes the substance under analysis (the analyte). The ions are then transported by magnetic or electric fields to the mass analyzer that separates the ions according to their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). Many mass spectrometers use two or more mass analyzers for tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The detector records the charge induced or current produced when an ion passes by or hits a surface. A mass spectrum is the result of measuring the signal produced in the detector when scanning m/z ions with a mass analyzer.
Mass spectrometry has rapidly developed as an important emerging method for the characterization of proteins. The two primary methods for ionization of whole proteins are electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). In keeping with the performance and mass range of available mass spectrometers, two approaches are used for characterizing proteins. In the first, intact proteins are ionized by either of the two techniques described above, and then introduced to a mass analyzer. In the second, proteins are enzymatically digested into smaller peptides using an agent such as trypsin or pepsin. The collection of peptide products are then introduced to the mass analyzer. The latter is often referred to as the “bottom-up” approach of protein analysis.
Proteins and/or peptides of interest to biological researchers are usually part of a very complex mixture of other proteins and molecules that co-exist in the biological medium. The high complexity of biological mixtures often makes coupling a separation technique, such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), highly desirable or even required after enzymatic digestion. In addition, HPLC on-line connected to ESI-MS offers the possibility for pre-concentration of dilute samples, desalting and removal of detergents. In many applications, and especially where relatively small volumes of sample are under analysis, improving detection sensitivity can become especially important. Improvement of detection sensitivity using concentration sensitive detectors such as UV/Vis absorbance and ESI mass spectrometers can be achieved by employing HPLC columns with smaller internal diameters (i.d.). For example, increased sensitivity during peptide analysis can result from using nano-LC (e.g., column i.d. of 50-100 μm) and capillary LC (e.g., column i.d. of 320 μm). Flow rate of the mobile phase through such columns is from several nanoliters per minute (nL/min), to several microliters per minute (μL/min), and the mobile phase can be sprayed directly without post-column splitting. The process of electrospray ionization at flow rates on the order of nanoliters (“nL”) per minute has been referred to as “nanoelectrospray ionization” (nanoESI).
Electrospray ionization (ESI) or nanoESI is a commonly applied ionization technique when dealing with biomolecules such as peptides and proteins. The electrospray process creates highly-charged droplets that, under evaporation, create ions representative of the species contained in the solution. An ion-sampling orifice of a mass spectrometer may be used to sample these gas phase ions for mass analysis. When an electric potential or field is applied to the outlet of a conducting needle (often referred to as a sprayer or emitter) relative to an extracting electrode, such as one provided at the ion-sampling orifice of a mass spectrometer, the electric field generated on the needle causes the separation of positively and negatively charged ions in solution and pushes ions of one polarity (e.g., positively charged or negatively charged) to the solution surface. The higher the electric field is the greater the surface charge repulsion force that counteracts the fluid surface tension is. When the repulsion force of the solvated ions exceeds the surface tension of the fluid being electrosprayed, a volume of the fluid is pulled into the shape of a cone, known as a Taylor cone, which extends from the tip of the needle. A liquid jet extends from the tip of the Taylor cone and becomes unstable and generates charged-droplets. These small charged droplets are drawn toward the extracting electrode, e.g., the sampling electrode of a mass spectrometer. The small droplets are highly-charged and solvent evaporation from the droplets results in the excess charge in the droplet residing on the analyte molecules in the electrosprayed fluid. The charged molecules or ions are drawn through the ion-sampling orifice of the mass spectrometer for mass analysis. The potential voltage (“V”) required to initiate an electrospray is dependent on the size of the sprayer, the surface tension of the solution, and the electric field can be on the order of approximately 106 V/m. The physical size of the needle and the fluid surface tension determines the density of electric field lines necessary to initiate electrospray.
In so-called nanoelectrospray, the sample is sprayed from a needle with a tip diameter less than about 5 μm, using a sample flow rate between 5 nL/min and 50 nL/min, for example. Charged droplets with diameters less than 1 micron can be formed at flow rates less than 40 nL/min. These small, highly-charged droplets can provide more efficient ionization of analytes contained within the droplets due to higher surface-to-volume ratios and smaller radii through which analytes need to diffuse to reach the charged surface of the droplets compared to conventional ESI. NanoESI-MS can thus be used for analyzing small amounts of sample with low sample concentrations (e.g., femtomole/microliter). Moreover, with nanoESI, the ion response for analytes contained in a sample solution is proportional to its concentration instead of its total amount. What this means is that if a solution is being sprayed at 200 nL/min or 50 nL/min or 20 nL/min the signal intensity as measured using mass spectrometry would be the same. Thus reducing a flow rate by a factor of 5 roughly increases mass spectrometry scans to be acquired for the same amount of sample by a factor of 5. As a result, signal averaging from the increased number of scans improves signal-to-noise ratios and ion statistics which enable multiple MS/MS experiments on the analytes and high accuracy in identifying analytes.
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a popular experimental method for identifying biomolecules such as proteins. Tandem MS involves multiple steps of mass selection or analysis, usually separated by some form of fragmentation. A tandem mass spectrometer is capable of multiple stages of mass spectrometry. For example, one mass analyzer can isolate one peptide from many others entering a mass spectrometer. A second mass analyzer then stabilizes the peptide ions while they collide with a gas, causing them to fragment by collision-induced dissociation (CID). A third mass analyzer then characterizes the fragments produced from the peptides. Tandem MS can also be done in a single mass analyzer over time as in a quadrupole ion trap. There are various methods for fragmenting molecules for tandem MS, including collision-induced dissociation (CID), electron capture dissociation (ECD), electron transfer dissociation (ETD), infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) and blackbody infrared radiative dissociation (BIRD).
Characterization of total digests (peptides) of complex protein mixtures using HPLC/MS is also called shotgun proteomics. Shotgun analysis involves direct digestion of protein mixtures to complex peptide mixtures, followed by the automated identification of the peptides by liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The development of shotgun proteomics today couples nano-LC for peptide analysis, automated MS to MS/MS data acquisition software and hardware on modern tandem mass spectrometers, along with data searching software of modern search engines. Modern mass spectrometers with data dependent scanning software are capable of acquiring MS and MS/MS data from many hundreds of peptides per hour.
The principle of shotgun analysis is to first “spread out” peptides in complex mixtures by multidimensional chromatographic separation. Tandem MS instruments then acquire peptide MS/MS spectra, which encode the peptide sequences. This acquisition can be done in a data-dependent way, whereby the instrument relies on a preliminary scan, performed as the peptides enter the instrument, to select peptides for fragmentation and generation of MS/MS spectra.
In one aspect, in general, a liquid chromatography system includes: a chromatographic column through which an effluent passes, wherein the effluent comprises a plurality of analytes that correspond to a plurality of chromatographic peaks and an eluent; a post-column splitter having at least two output ports through which the effluent of the column is split to at least a first portion and a second portion; a mass spectrometer configured to receive the first portion from a first of the output ports for analysis; and a tube connected to a second of the output ports configured to prevent substantial evaporation of the eluent in the second portion until undergoing mass spectrometry. The second portion has a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least two chromatographic peaks.
Aspects can include one or more of the following features.
The system is configured to direct the second portion to the mass spectrometer after the first portion is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The system further comprises a pump connected to the tube to pump the second portion to the mass spectrometer after the first portion is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The system further comprises a second detector configured to receive the second portion from the tube after the first portion is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The second detector comprises a mass spectrometer.
The second detector comprises an infusion nanoESI/MS device.
The tube is configured to substantially reduce the diffusion of the analytes in the effluent stored in the tube.
The tube is configured to stay at a temperature lower than the room temperature.
The tube comprises an electrolysis electrode to electrolyze the eluent to produce a gas segment between any two eluent segments.
The electrolysis is triggered by an analytical device.
The device is an ultraviolet detector, fluorescence detector, an electrochemical detector, evaporative light scattering detector, nuclear magnetic resonant spectrometer, charged aerosol detector, refractive index detector, or a mass spectrometer.
The mass spectrometer comprises an electrospray sprayer.
The mass spectrometer comprises an ESI/MS device.
The mass spectrometer comprises an infusion nanoESI/MS device.
The infusion nanoESI/MS device comprises a nanoESI sprayer.
The nanoESI sprayer comprises a pulled tip of a fused silica capillary.
The infusion nanoESI/MS device comprises a chip containing an array of nanoelectrospray nozzles.
The tube comprises a fused silica capillary.
The tube has a diameter of 250 μm or less.
The tube has a diameter of 100 μm or less.
The tube has a diameter of 75 μm or less.
The tube has a diameter of 50 μm or less.
The tube has a length of about 1 meter or more.
The tube has a length of about 10 meters or less.
The tube has a length of about 6 meters.
The second portion is directed for mass spectrometry at a lower flow rate than the first portion is.
The splitter comprises a T-shape piece that creates a volume ratio of about 4:1 to about 1:1 of the second portion to the first potion.
The splitter comprises a valve that has at least five ports, a first connector connecting two of said ports, and a second connector connecting three or more of the rest said ports to split the effluent.
The valve has at least six ports.
The valve has at least one port connected to a flow controller.
The valve has two ports that are connected by the tube.
The valve is switchable between at least two configurations, including a first configuration in which the second connector connects a first set of three ports, and a second configuration in which the second connector connects a second set of ports different from the first set.
The analytes in the second portion exit the tube in the same order in which the analytes exit the chromatographic column.
The analytes in the second portion exit the tube in a reversed order in which the analytes exit the chromatographic column.
The second portion is mixed with a stream of liquid before the portion undergoes mass spectrometry.
The second portion has a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least half of the plurality of chromatographic peaks corresponding to the analytes that pass through the chromatographic column.
The second portion has a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least 90% of the plurality of chromatographic peaks corresponding to the analytes that pass through the chromatographic column.
The system further comprises a second chromatographic column, wherein the inner diameter of the second column is smaller than that of the first column.
In another aspect, in general, a method of characterizing an analyte in a sample includes: passing an effluent comprising a plurality of analytes and an eluent through a chromatographic column, the analytes corresponding to a plurality of chromatographic peaks; splitting at least a first portion and a second portion of the effluent from respective output ports of a post-column splitter, the first portion being directed from a first of the output ports to a mass spectrometer for analysis; and receiving the second portion having a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least two chromatographic peaks in a tube connected to a second of the output ports to prevent substantial evaporation of the eluent before undergoing mass spectrometry.
The method further comprises directing the second portion from the tube to the mass spectrometer after the first portion is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The method further comprises directing the second portion from the tube to a second mass spectrometer after the first portion is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The method further comprises analyzing a first analyte from the stored second portion after a second analyte from the first portion has been analyzed by the mass spectrometer, wherein the first analyte passed out of the chromatographic column before the second analyte passed out of the chromatographic column.
The method further comprises analyzing a first analyte from the stored second portion after a second analyte from the second stored portion has been analyzed by the mass spectrometer, wherein the first analyte passed out of the chromatographic column before the second analyte passed out of the chromatographic column.
The method further comprises analyzing a first analyte from the stored second portion before a second analyte from the second stored portion has been analyzed by the mass spectrometer, wherein the first analyte passed out of the chromatographic column before the second analyte passed out of the chromatographic column.
The method further comprises cooling the second portion to substantially reduce diffusion of the analytes in the eluent captured in the tube.
The method further comprises segmenting the stored second portion into a least two segments in the tube by a gas bubble wherein the gas bubble creates a diffusion boundary to the analytes in the portion.
The gas bubble is formed by electrolysis of the eluent of the second portion.
The method further comprises recording the segment positions in the tube by counting gas bubbles.
The method further comprises segmenting the stored second portion into at least two segments in the tube by a non-mixing liquid segment wherein the non-mixing liquid segment creates a diffusion boundary to the analytes in the portion.
The method further comprises directing the stored second portion in the tube to the mass spectrometer at a calibrated flow rate controlled by a pump connected to the tube.
The calibrated flow rate is less than 5,000 nL/min.
The calibrated flow rate is less than 1,000 nL/min.
The calibrated flow rate is less than 200 nL/min.
The second portion has a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least half of the plurality of chromatographic peaks corresponding to the analytes that pass through the chromatographic column.
The second portion has a plurality of separated analytes corresponding to at least 90% of the plurality of chromatographic peaks corresponding to the analytes that pass through the chromatographic column.
The method further comprises directing the effluent into a second chromatographic column.
The directing is performed by controlling back pressures of the splitter by connecting a pump to a port of the splitter.
Aspects may include one or more of the following advantages.
A post-column splitter can divide a liquid chromatographic effluent such that a first fraction of the effluent is subjected to immediate nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry analysis while a second fraction is captured and stored in a tube, e.g., a capillary tube with i.d. of about a few tens of microns. The splitter can be a T-shape piece, or chip-based channels, or a multi-port valve that can divide the effluent. The splitter can also be configured to divide the effluent to more than two fractions thus allow more than one fractions to be captured and stored in individual tubes for later usage. The dimension of the capture tube is selected to control diffusion of analytes molecules so that the degree of remixing of the separated analytes can be controlled or minimized. Gas segments can be introduced to the captured fraction to further limit diffusion of LC-separated analytes to confined regions and thus greatly increase storing time of the faction. Moreover, using a tube to store a fraction of the LC effluent allows the analyte molecules maintained in a solution, e.g., to prevent decomposition of the analyte upon drying or to prevent loss of precious sample by drying and redissolving it in a solvent. The second fraction collected in the tube can be redirected to a nanoESI sprayer to enable additional MS data to be acquired from the same sample injection based on the initial MS analysis of the first fraction, e.g., at a lower flow rate to the sprayer for targeted analytes or skipping analysis of less interesting analytes in the fraction to save time. The captured fraction can also be modified or treated before MS analysis by, e.g., adding another solvent, or undergoing another LC analysis, e.g., ion exchange chromatography.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Liquid chromatography (LC) with columns of small internal diameters, e.g., capillary LC and nano-LC columns, can be coupled with nanoESI to combine the benefits of sample separation and/or concentration in columns of small diameters and improved ionization efficiencies with nanoESI. For good LC separation resolution, peak widths should be narrow, but narrow peaks limit the acquisition time for mass spectral data. Preferably, an analytical system should enable separation of all compounds within an HPLC system (narrow peaks and high peak capacity), while enabling essentially unlimited time to acquire mass spectrometric data for each separated compound. For example, peak width at half height of compounds eluting from capillary- or nano-LC columns is generally in the range of 5 seconds to 30 seconds. During this period, the peptide needs to be sequenced, which may require multiple stages of MS detection. Sequencing of the peptides is performed by comparing measured and calculated fragment spectra. These scan cycles take approximately a few hundred milliseconds to a few seconds, which allows the experiment to perform only limited numbers of cycles during the elution of a chromatographic peak.
Some nano-LC/nanoESI-MS techniques spray the entire effluent exiting the nano-LC column with a nanoESI sprayer. As discussed above, each analyte eluting from a column occurs as a transient with a time profile of seconds. When samples become complex and contain multiple analytes that are co-eluting, data-dependent scanning or other methods of MS/MS such as ECD or ETD may not be able to acquire spectra fast enough to identify all the analytes, e.g., peptides, as they enter the MS instrument, thus many analyte identifications can be missed. Often times it is only possible to collect MS/MS data on components of highest intensities in the initial MS scanning, thus restricting dynamic range for component identification.
The present disclosure includes description of techniques that are able to solve these problems. For example, the strengths of nano liquid chromatography/mass spectrometery (nanoLC/MS) and infusion nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry (nanoESI/MS) can be combined with a post-column splitter that divides the LC effluent such that a first portion or fraction of the effluent is subjected to nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry analysis immediately after chromatographic separation and a second portion or fraction is captured and stored in a tube, e.g., a capillary tube with i.d. of about 20-50 μm. After a short time, e.g., following completion of the LC separation of the entire or partial sample injection, and/or completion of an initial MS analysis of the first portion of the effluent, the second portion collected in the tube can be redirected to a nanoESI sprayer to enable additional MS data to be acquired from the same sample injection based on the initial MS analysis to allow more signal averaging and improve accuracy of sample identification or proteome coverage in a shotgun experiment, for instance.
Referring to
In some embodiments, column 12 can be an HPLC column with an internal diameter in the micrometer scale, e.g., a nano-LC column of 75 μm i.d., and the flow rate can be controlled by a nano-LC pump to range between about 10 nL/min to 1000 nL/min, e.g., about 200 nL/min to 300 nL/min.
The post-column splitter 14 can be a T-shape piece (“Tee”) as shown in
The flow rate ratio can be adjusted by controlling the back pressures of the output ports of the splitter. There are several factors that influence back pressure, such as the inner diameters and lengths of the output ports and tubes connected to them. In some embodiments, the inner diameters of the output ports and/or the tubes connected to them can be about 5 μm to 750 μm, e.g., 10 to 500 μm, 20 to 200 μm, or 50 to 100 μm. For example, in a particular embodiment, port 13 can have 15 μm i.d. with 15 centimeters of total tubing length while port 15 has 50 μm i.d. with 600 cm of total tube length to achieve a flow rate ratio of 1:3. Back pressure can also be affected by applying external pressure to the split portions via, e.g., a spit adjustor, more detail of which follows.
Referring particularly to
For system 10 to be in the second mode as shown in
In other embodiments, splitter 14 can be a multiple-port micro switching valve with at least one groove or channel that connects three or more ports simultaneously so that the valve can not only exhibit the same function as a T-shape splitter but also have additional functional features. As an example, a 6-port valve is shown in
In some embodiments, composition modification or treatment of the captured portion of the separated analytes in tube 16 may be desired, e.g., adding a different mobile phase to increase ionization of the analytes for mass spectrometry experiment. The modification of the captured portion may achieve, e.g., changes in ionization, electrochemical modification of captured components, enzyme degradation of intact proteins or peptides, mass tagging, or enzymatic de-phosphorylation of peptides or proteins, thus providing additional assistance in sample characterization. Two exemplary approaches of introducing a ‘treating’ flow of, e.g., a compound, a reactant to a given analyte, a salt, and/or a mobile phase, to the captured portion in tube 16 are illustrated in
Referring particularly to
Referring particularly to
In embodiments, the flow rate can be controlled by a feedback loop including a flow sensor and a split adjuster or a flow controller. As shown is
In some embodiments, more other features or devices can be included in the LC/MS system 10 to further improve the performance of the system. For example, another LC column (e.g., a nano-LC column) can be placed, e.g., between port 1 and mass spectrometer 18 (e.g., as in
As discussed above, splitting an LC (e.g., HPLC) effluent prior to a nanoESI analytical device and mass spectrometer enables the acquisition of MS data on all of the components or analytes in the sample, searching the component MS data against a database, then redirecting the portion captured in the capillary tube to the nanoESI/MS device and conducting the MS experiments (e.g., MS/MS) based on the database search results. For example, this disclosure would be useful to analyze a mixture of peptides formed from enzymatically digesting a protein(s) using nanoLC/MS while simultaneously capturing the separated peptides into a tube. At the end of the initial round of nanoLC/MS experiment on the first portion of the sample, the MS data acquired can be analyzed against a database to propose the most probable proteins. Then an intelligent MS experiment targeting peptides that should be present in the second portion of the same sample (i.e., the captured chromatogram in the tube) can be produced to increase the probability of correctly identifying the protein(s), especially if the peptides have very low signal intensities in the initial round of MS. In another example, analysis of intact proteins, which is traditionally difficult for MS to acquire enough data to identify the protein during a single LC/MS experiment, can be achieved with improved accuracy and sensitivity by combining the LC experiment with infusion nanoESI/MS analysis of captured proteins in a tube which substantially remain separated corresponding to the chromatogram. The proteins coming out of the tube may correspond to broader peaks due to diffusion forces, which enables a second, longer MS experiment to be performed on the same injection of a sample. The extended time can allow more signal averaging or multiple MS or MS/MS acquisitions than those using conventional techniques. The diffusion of separated components or analytes in the capture tube can be controlled by various means, such as tube inner diameter, tube length, time in the tube (controlled by length of the nanoLC experiment, for example), or by lowering the tube temperature or introducing barriers between two components to prevent remixing. More discussion follows.
The tube 16 is configured to capture and store a portion of the effluent of the column for a later round of analysis, e.g., with extended analysis time compared to that available for the initial MS scanning of portion 24. In some embodiments, the tube 16 is a capillary tube and its dimension (e.g., inner diameter) is chosen to define a desired range of diffusion of analytes for a desired outcome. For example, the capillary dimensions can be chosen based on the chromatographic peak volume exiting the LC column coupled to the capillary. When using 300 nL/min flow rate from a nano-LC column, peaks that are 12 seconds wide correspond to peak volumes of 60 nL. If a 50 micron inner diameter capillary tube is used as the capture and storing tube, 60 nL corresponds to a length of about 30 mm of the tube. The length of tube can therefore be predetermined to capture and store one or more analyte peaks. In a particular embodiment, the tube can be a fused silica tube with an inner diameter of about 50 μm and a length of around 600 cm. The diameter of the tube is selected to be on the micrometer scale so that diffusion of the captured LC-separated analytes can be controlled, e.g., reducing the likelihood of remixing the separated compounds and losing chromatographic separation.
The techniques described in the present disclosure can take into account characteristics of molecular diffusion in fluids (e.g., eluents) captured in a tube. Molecules (e.g., peptides or proteins) in solution can diffuse randomly in all directions. Molecular diffusion e.g., in a capillary tube, can be predicted based on capillary diameter, size of molecule, bulk solution properties and temperature. The volume of solution where molecules of a given analyte spread per unit length of a capillary is proportional to the square radius of the capillary. In other words, the spreading length of molecules in a solution of fixed volume is inversely proportional to the square radius of the capillary. In addition, the smaller the surface area (e.g. the square radius of the capillary) is, the less frequently or less likely diffusion takes place. As a consequence, reducing or minimizing the change in the volume of a solution of analyte molecules in a tube caused by molecular diffusion and/or reducing the surface area at the boundaries of two analyte zones can be accomplished by use of a capillary with reduced diameter. The effect is to stretch a fixed volume along the length of a capillary. For example, a typical analyte separated by nano-LC at a flow rate of 200 nL/min exits the column in a volume of approximately 50 nL. The length of a 50 nL volume which is dependent on the capillary diameter can vary from about 1 mm to about 2500 mm with capillary diameter changing from 250 μm to 5 μm.
In some embodiments, molecular diffusion in the tube can be controlled for example, by inserting gas bubbles into the capillary to segment the solution, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, diffusion can be reduced by cooling the solution to a temperature below the room temperature, e.g., about 4° C. In yet some other embodiments, controlled diffusion (e.g., enhanced diffusion) may be beneficial when the sample is analyzed by infusion nanoESI/MS since the time for acquiring analyte signals and for more MS analyzing cycles will be extended as the analyte diffuses to spread within higher volume which leads to longer time for the analyte to exit the tube at a fixed flow rate. Different embodiments might be combined to achieve the best control of diffusion based on specific requirement of the experiments.
Moreover, other potential benefits of using a tube to store a portion of the LC effluent include keeping the analyte molecules in a solution, e.g., to prevent decomposition of the analyte upon drying or to prevent loss of precious sample by drying and redissolving it in a solvent.
In some embodiments, temperature can be increased. For example, the system can capture intact protein separation, heat and digest proteins with the stored mobile phase.
Mass spectrometer or MS device 18 can be used for tandem MS, e.g., an infusion nanoESI/MS device. The nanoESI sprayer or emitter can be a fused silica capillary with a pulled tip which has an i.d. of about 1-15 μm, or an ESI Chip® available from Advion Biosciences, Inc., which is a microfluidics chip containing an array of nanoelectrospray nozzles, each one-fifth the diameter of a human hair, etched in a silicon wafer for nanoelectrospray.
Many advantages of the techniques described in present disclosure including reserving or storing a portion of a sample have been apparent from the description of different embodiments. One exemplary advantage is that storing a portion of a sample allows subsequent MS experiments to be adjusted to focus on analysis of components or analytes of the sample missed by initial nanoLC/MS experiments. For example, previously identified components of the sample can be excluded from the data dependent acquisition during the subsequent infusion experiment (from the portion stored in the tube), therefore, infusion experiments are able to acquire MS/MS data on the lower-intensity components missed during the initial nanoLC/MS/MS experiment. In some cases, previously identified components of the sample can be included in data dependent acquisition (and others excluded) during the subsequent infusion experiment to further analyze those components in more detail.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the ancillary control device 90 in
In some embodiments, the split ratio of the LC effluent can be fixed or varied during the division process, e.g., according to the different abundances of analytes, by adjusting the backpressure of the output ports. For example, if analyte A is 10 times as much as analyte B in the sample, when they are separated in the LC column, split ratio of effluent with analyte A may be set to 1:10 while split ratio of effluent with analyte B may be set to 1:1.
In some embodiments, LC effluent directed to the capture capillary could be segmented and fraction collected into individual tubes (e.g., capillaries) with a tapered end on which a nanoESI sprayer could be formed. For example, each of N capillary tube can be connected to a port of a 1:N splitter.
In some embodiments, LC effluent can be divided to more than two portions and at least two portions are captured and stored in individual tubes (e.g., capillaries). For example, as shown in
In some embodiments, one portion of the effluent of a nanoLC column is driven to the mass spectrometer while another portion is captured by a capillary tube. Referring to
The effluent can be directed into column 70 or into capillary tube 80b by controlling the back pressures of the output ports of the splitter. Factors that influence back pressure include the inner diameters and the lengths of the output ports as well as the tubes connected to them. In some embodiments, the inner diameters of the output ports and/or the tubes connected to them can be about 5 microns to 750 microns, e.g., 10 to 500 microns, 20 to 200 microns, or 50 to 100 microns. For example, in a particular embodiment, the port leading to column 70 can have an i.d. of 15 microns and 15 centimeters of total tubing length while the capillary 80b can have an i.d. of 50 microns and 15 centimeters of total tube length to achieve a flow rate ratio of 1:3. Back pressure can also be affected by applying an external pressure to the split portions via, e.g., a spit adjustor.
Referring to
Referring to
A person of skill in the art will appreciate that the additional techniques of temperature control and diffusion control, described earlier in the application, can be combined with the embodiments involving an effluent that is separated into multiple portions.
All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein including the appendix, are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Still other embodiments are within the following claims.
This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. 60/896,692, filed on Mar. 23, 2007, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4670404 | Swift et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5387397 | Strauss et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5614154 | Glatz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5808020 | Ferrieri et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5842787 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856671 | Henion et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858187 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859070 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5921678 | Desai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922591 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961932 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5965092 | Chatterjee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976472 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001229 | Ramsey | Dec 1999 | A |
6010607 | Ramsey | Jan 2000 | A |
6033546 | Ramsey | Mar 2000 | A |
6036927 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6062261 | Jacobson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6106710 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110343 | Ramsey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117396 | Demers | Sep 2000 | A |
6120666 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139734 | Settlage et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180372 | Franzen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187206 | Bernier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6231737 | Ramsey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235471 | Knapp et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241953 | Krijgsman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284525 | Mathies et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315905 | Settlage et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319476 | Victor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342142 | Ramsey | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6376181 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6409072 | Breuer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440669 | Bass et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444461 | Knapp et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475363 | Ramsey | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485692 | Freitag et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524456 | Ramsey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537506 | Schwalbe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541274 | Nagle et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6572830 | Burdon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6620386 | Welch | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632656 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6706538 | Karg et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6749814 | Bergh et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6794148 | Jindal et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806087 | Kibby et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818189 | Adris et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828143 | Bard | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6858435 | Chervet et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6890493 | Bergh et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6896855 | Kohler et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6926313 | Renzi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6958122 | Gidner et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6977064 | Adris et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7182371 | Renzi | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7244961 | Jovanovich et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20040022696 | Zigler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040208794 | Karg et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040258615 | Buchanan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050019213 | Kechagia et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052509 | Gilligan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050181519 | Karg et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050221373 | Enzelberger et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050226776 | Brady et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232387 | Padgett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252840 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060150385 | Gilligan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060289737 | Bassmann et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070071664 | Bellos et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005025499 | Dec 2006 | DE |
9-263591 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2000-249694 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2005-065632 | Mar 2005 | JP |
0264094 | Sep 1988 | PL |
WO 9967656 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0134660 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0211880 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03002157 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03002489 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03078358 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2005056872 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082535 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080314129 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60896692 | Mar 2007 | US |