LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20110032466
  • Publication Number
    20110032466
  • Date Filed
    April 10, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Published
    February 10, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A pixel of a liquid crystal display device of the present invention includes first and second linear alignment control structures 10a, 20a. The first and second linear alignment control structures each include a first component extending along a first axis L1 and a second component extending along a second axis L2 that is different from the first axis. Each of the first and second axes generally bisects angles between the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates. At least one group of the first and second linear alignment control structures are ribs 20a. A first component 20a1 of the rib includes three or more first linear portions arranged along the first axis. The first linear portions are arranged such that adjacent two form an angle of θ1 where 50°≦θ1<180° and that the direction which bisects θ1 is generally perpendicular to the first axis. A second component 20a2 of the rib includes three or more second linear portions arranged along the second axis. The second linear portions are arranged such that adjacent two form an angle of θ2 where 50°≦θ2<180° and that the direction which bisects θ2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a liquid crystal display device and specifically to a vertical alignment mode liquid crystal display device.


BACKGROUND ART

In recent years, vertical alignment (VA) mode liquid crystal display devices which have wider viewing angles and higher contrast ratios than conventional TN mode liquid crystal display devices have been used in a wide variety of display devices, typically in large-size display devices, such as television displays and information displays.


The VA mode liquid crystal display devices have a liquid crystal layer formed of a nematic liquid crystal material of negative dielectric anisotropy. In the case where no voltage is applied across this liquid crystal layer (including a case where a voltage lower than a threshold voltage is applied), liquid crystal molecules are oriented substantially vertical (not less than 85° and not more than) 90° to the substrate surface (a surface of a vertical alignment film). In the case where a voltage is applied across the liquid crystal layer, the liquid crystal molecules incline toward orientations parallel to the substrate surface.


MVA (Multi-Domain Vertical Alignment) mode is known in which the viewing angle characteristics are further improved as compared with the VA mode liquid crystal display devices (see Patent Document 1). In the MVA mode devices, linear alignment control structures (slits or ribs) extending in two directions perpendicular to each other are provided to form four liquid crystal domains between the alignment control structures such that the azimuths of the directors which are representative of the respective domains form angles of 45° relative to the polarization axes (transmission axes) of polarizing plates placed in crossed Nicols. Assuming that the azimuthal angle of 0° is identical with the o'clock direction of the clock dial and that the counterclockwise direction is the positive direction, the azimuthal angles of the directors of the four domains are 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315°. Such a configuration in which four domains are formed in one pixel is referred to as “4-domain alignment structure” or simply “4D structure”. Note that some of the MVA mode liquid crystal display devices in which both alignment control structures provided on the liquid crystal layer sides of the pair of substrates opposing each other via the liquid crystal layer are slits formed in the electrodes are sometimes referred to as OVA (Patterned Vertical Alignment) mode.


The VA mode liquid crystal display devices perform a black display in the absence of an applied voltage, i.e., while liquid crystal molecules are oriented vertical to the substrate surface (normally black mode). Therefore, an excellent black display (low luminance) can be achieved, and as a result, a high contrast ratio can be realized.


Citation List

Patent Literature


Patent Document 1: Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 11-242225


SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem

However, in a MVA mode liquid crystal display device which uses ribs (i.e., linear dielectric protrusions) as alignment control structures, liquid crystal molecules in the vicinity of the ribs incline relative to the direction normal to the substrate surface even in the absence of an applied voltage. This is a factor which causes leakage of light in the state of black display and deteriorates the contrast ratio (as will be described later with reference to the drawings FIG. 17 and FIG. 18).


The present invention was conceived in order to solve the above problems. One of the objects of the present invention is to improve the contrast ratio of a MVA mode liquid crystal display device which includes ribs (linear dielectric protrusions) as the alignment control structures.


Solution to Problem

A liquid crystal display device of the present invention is a liquid crystal display device including a plurality of pixels, the liquid crystal display device including: a first substrate; a second substrate; a vertical alignment type liquid crystal layer interposed between the first substrate and the second substrate; a first electrode provided on a side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal; a second electrode provided on a side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal; and a pair of polarizing plates opposing each other with the liquid crystal layer interposed therebetween, the polarizing plates being in a crossed Nicols arrangement. Each of the plurality of pixels includes a plurality of first linear alignment control structures provided on the side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer and a plurality of second linear alignment control structures provided on the side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer. The plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures each include a first component extending along a first axis and a second component extending along a second axis that is different from the first axis, each of the first axis and the second axis being an axis which bisects an angle between the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates. At least one group of the plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of linear dielectric protrusions. The first component of the plurality of linear dielectric protrusions includes three or more first linear portions arranged along the first axis, the three or more first linear portions being arranged such that adjacent two of the three or more first linear portions form an angle of θ1 where 50°≦θ1<180° and that a direction which bisects θ1 is generally perpendicular to the first axis. The second component of the plurality of linear dielectric protrusions includes three or more second linear portions arranged along the second axis, the three or more second linear portions being arranged such that adjacent two of the three or more second linear portions form an angle of θ2 where 50°≦θ2<180° and that a direction which bisects 02 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


In one embodiment, the adjacent two first linear portions which define θ1 have equal lengths, and the adjacent two second linear portions which define θ2 have equal lengths.


In one embodiment, all of the three or more first linear portions and the three or more second linear portions have equal lengths.


In one embodiment, θ1 and θ2 are each independently not less than 74° and not more than 109°. More preferably, θ1 and θ2 are each independently not less than 85° and not more than 96°.


In one embodiment, θ1=θ2.


In one embodiment, θ1 and θ2 are about 90°.


In one embodiment, the three or more first linear portions and the three or more second linear portions are arranged with the pitch of not more than 10 μm.


In one embodiment, the plurality of first linear alignment control structures are a plurality of slits provided in the first electrode, and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of linear dielectric protrusions provided on a side of the second electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer.


In one embodiment, one of the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates is identical with a horizontal direction of a display plane.


Advantageous Effects of Invention

According to the present invention, the contrast ratio of a MVA mode liquid crystal display device which includes ribs (linear dielectric protrusions) as the alignment control structures can be improved. A liquid crystal display device of the present invention can be readily manufactured using a manufacture process of conventional liquid crystal display device, except that the shape of the ribs is changed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1(
a) to (d) are schematic plan views each showing one pixel of liquid crystal display devices 100a, 100b, 100c, and 100d of the embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 A schematic diagram that illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20a shown in FIG. 1(a).



FIG. 3(
a) is a schematic diagram which illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20c shown in FIG. 1(c). (b) is a schematic diagram which illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20d shown in FIG. 1(d).



FIG. 4 A diagram showing a two-dimensional cross-sectional structure of a structural unit 100p of a liquid crystal display device used in simulations.



FIG. 5 A diagram showing a linear rib 20 of a conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device (Comparative Example) which is seen in a direction normal to the substrate.



FIG. 6 A plan view of a structural unit 100p of a conventional liquid crystal display device (Comparative Example) used in simulations.



FIGS. 7(
a) and (b) are diagrams showing the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Comparative Example, (a) for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V) and (b) for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V) .



FIG. 8 A plan view showing a stair-shaped rib 20A of a structural unit 100p of Example 1.



FIGS. 9(
a) and (b) are diagrams showing the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Example 1, (a) for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V) and (b) for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).



FIG. 10 A plan view showing a stair-shaped rib 20B of a structural unit 100p of Example 2.



FIGS. 11(
a) and (b) are diagrams showing the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Example 2, (a) for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V) and (b) for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).



FIG. 12 A plan view showing a stair-shaped rib 20C of a structural unit 100p of Example 3.



FIGS. 13(
a) and (b) are diagrams showing the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Example 3, (a) for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V) and (b) for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).



FIG. 14 A plan view showing a stair-shaped rib 20D of a structural unit 100p of Example 4.



FIGS. 15(
a) and (b) are diagrams showing the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Example 4, (a) for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V) and (b) for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).



FIG. 16 A graph illustrating the relationship between the vertex angle e of an isosceles triangle which forms the stair-like shape and the contrast ratio.



FIG. 17 A schematic diagram which illustrates the azimuth of the orientations of liquid crystal molecules 30a in the vicinity of a linearly-extending rib 20 in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device.



FIG. 18 shows the result of a simulation of leakage of light in the black displaying state which may occur in the vicinity of the rib 20 shown in FIG. 17.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, a liquid crystal display device that is an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Note that, however, the present invention is not limited to examples of the liquid crystal display device of the embodiment which will be described below.



FIGS. 1(
a) to 1(d) are schematic plan views each showing one pixel of liquid crystal display devices 100a, 100b, 100c, and 100d of the embodiment of the present invention.


The liquid crystal display device of the embodiment of the present invention is a MVA mode liquid crystal display device. Specifically, the liquid crystal display device includes a first substrate (e.g., a TFT substrate), a second substrate (e.g., a color filter substrate), a vertical alignment type liquid crystal layer interposed between the first substrate and the second substrate, a first electrode provided on a side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer (e.g., a pixel electrode), a second electrode provided on a side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer (a counter electrode), and a pair of polarizing plates in a crossed Nicols arrangement with the liquid crystal layer interposed therebetween. Here, the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates extend in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction, respectively.


A plurality of pixels of the liquid crystal display devices shown in FIGS. 1(a) to 1(d) respectively includes a plurality of first linear alignment control structures 10a provided on a side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer and a plurality of second linear alignment control structures 20a, 20b, 20c20d provided on a side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer.


The plurality of first linear alignment control structures 10a and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures 20a, 20b, 20c20d respectively include first components (10a1, 20a1, 20b1, 20c1, and 20d1) extending along the first axis and second components (10a2, 20a2, 20b2, 20c2, and 20d2) extending along the second axis that is different from the first axis. At least one group of the plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of linear dielectric protrusions (hereinafter, referred to as “ribs”). The plurality of first linear alignment control structures 10a and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures 20a, 20b, 20c20d are arranged so as to alternate when seen in a direction vertical to the first substrate and the second substrate. This basic structure is the same as that of the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device see Patent Document 1).


Each of the first axis and the second axis is an axis which generally bisects the angle between the polarization axes (transmission axes) of the pair of polarizing plates and is arranged so as to form angles of 45° with the two polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates extending in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction in a display plane.


In the example described below, the plurality of first linear alignment control structures are a plurality of slits provided in the first electrode, and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of ribs provided on a side of the second electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer. At least one group of the plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures may be a plurality of ribs. When both the first linear alignment control structures and the second linear alignment control structures are ribs, the effects of the present invention can be obtained by applying the present invention to at least one group of the first and second linear alignment control structures such that they have a stair-like shape as will be described later. Note that, to obtain a high contrast ratio, it is preferable that one group consists of slits and the other consists of ribs. Also, it is preferable in terms of manufacture process that the slits are provided in the pixel electrode and the ribs are provided on a side of the counter electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer.


In the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100a of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1(a), the slit 10a provided in the pixel electrode includes a first component 10a1 and a second component 10a2, and the rib 20a provided on a side of the counter electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer includes a first component 20a1 and a second component 20a2. The first component 10a1 and the second component 10a2 of the slit 10a each have a linear shape. The rib 20a further includes a third component 20a3 which connects the first component 20a1 and the second component 20a2. The direction in which the first components 10a1, 20a1 of the slit 10a and the rib 20a extend (the first axis) and the direction in which the second components 10a2, 20a2 of the slit 10a and the rib 20a extend (the second axis) are perpendicular to each other.


A feature of the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100a resides in that the first component 20a1 and the second component 20a2 of the rib 20a each have a stair-like shape extending along the first axis or the second axis. The stair-like shape is formed by linking two sides (the two sides of equal lengths, the sides other than the base) of isosceles triangles with the vertex angle of 90°. The direction which bisects the vertex angle of the first component 20a1 of the rib 20a is generally perpendicular to the first axis. The direction which bisects the vertex angle of the second component 20a2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


Also in the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100b shown in FIG. 1(b), the slit 10a provided in the pixel electrode includes the first component 10a1 and the second component 10a2, and the rib 20b provided on a side of the counter electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer includes a first component 20b1 and a second component 20b2, as in the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100a. The rib 20b further includes a third component 20b3 which connects the first component 20b1 and the second component 20b2. The direction in which the first components 10a1, 20b1 of the slit 10a and the rib 20b extend (the first axis) and the direction in which the second component 10a2, 20b2 of the slit 10a and the rib 20b extend (the second axis) are perpendicular to each other.


Also in the rib 20b of the liquid crystal display device 100b, the first component 20b1 and the second component 20b2 of the rib 20b each have a stair-like shape extending along the first axis or the second axis. The stair-like shape of the rib 20b of the liquid crystal display device 100b is different from the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a in that the vertex portions of the right isosceles triangles are in the form of a circular arc. Although the vertex portions are in the form of a circular arc, the major part of the first component 20b1 and the second component 20b2 of the rib 20b is constituted of two equal sides of an isosceles triangle with the vertex angle of 90° as in the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a, and the angle between these two sides is 90°. Referring to this angle as “vertex angle” for the convenience of description, the direction which bisects the vertex angle of the first component 20b1 of the rib 20b is generally perpendicular to the first axis, and the direction which bisects the vertex angle of the second component 20b2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


Also in the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100c shown in FIG. 1(c), the slit 10a provided in the pixel electrode includes the first component 10a1 and the second component 10a2, and the rib 20c provided on a side of the counter electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer includes a first component 20c1 and a second component 20c2, as in the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100a. The rib 20c further includes a third component 20c3 which connects the first component 20c1 and the second component 20c2. The direction in which the first components 10a1, 20c1 of the slit 10a and the rib 20c extend (the first axis) and the direction in which the second component 10a2, 20c2 of the slit 10a and the rib 20c extend (the second axis) are perpendicular to each other.


Also in the rib 20c of the liquid crystal display device 100c, the first component 20c1 and the second component 20c2 of the rib 20c each have a stair-like shape extending along the first axis or the second, axis. The stair-like shape of the rib 20c of the liquid crystal display device 100c is different from the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a in that the angle of the vertex of the right isosceles triangles is an obtuse angle (more than 90° and less than 180°). The direction which bisects the vertex angle of the first component 20c1 of the rib 20c is generally perpendicular to the first axis, and the direction which bisects the vertex angle of the second component 20c2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


Also in the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100d shown in FIG. 1(d), the slit 10a provided in the pixel electrode includes the first component 10a1 and the second component 10a2, and the rib 20d provided on a side of the counter electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer includes a first component 20d1 and a second component 20d2, as the pixel of the liquid crystal display device 100a. The rib 20d further includes a third component 20d3 which connects the first component 20d1 and the second component 20d2. The direction in which the first components 10a1, 20d1 of the slit 10a and the rib 20d extend (the first axis) and the direction in which the second component 10a2, 20d2 of the slit 10a and the rib 20d extend (the second axis) are perpendicular to each other.


Also in the rib 20d of the liquid crystal display device 100d, the first component 20d1 and the second component 20d2 of the rib 20d each have a stair-like shape extending along the first axis or the second axis. The stair-like shape of the rib 20d of the liquid crystal display device 100d is different from the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a in that the angle of the vertex of the right isosceles triangles is an acute angle (not less than 50° and less than)90°. The direction which bisects the vertex angle of the first component 20d1 of the rib 20d is generally perpendicular to the first axis, and the direction which bisects the vertex angle of the second component 20d2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


Next, the function of the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a of the embodiment of the present invention, which has the stair-like shape, is described with reference to FIG. 2.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20a. PA denotes the polarization axis of one of the pair of polarizing plates in a crossed Nicols arrangement which is on the viewer side. PP denotes the polarization axis of the other polarizing plate which is on the rear side (backlight side).


As previously described, the rib 20a includes the first component 20a1 and the second component 20a2. The direction in which the first component 20a1 of the rib 20a extends is represented by the first axis L1. The direction in which the second component 20a2 of the rib 20a extends is represented by the second axis L2. The first axis L1 and the second axis L2 are perpendicular to each other. The first axis L1 and the second axis L2 bisect the angles between the polarization axes PP and PA)(90°.


The first component 20a1 of the rib 20a has a stair-like shape extending along the first axis L1. The second component 20a2 has a stair-like shape extending along the second axis L2. The first component 20a1 of the rib 20a includes three or more first linear portions arranged along the first axis L1. Adjacent two of these first linear portions form an angle of θa=90°. The direction which bisects the angle θa is perpendicular to the first axis L1.


As for the first linear portions which constitute the first component 20a1 of the rib 20a, the direction of rotation by which the angle θa between adjacent two first linear portions is defined (denoted by small arrows in FIG. 1) alternately changes in the order of “clockwise”, “counterclockwise”, “clockwise”, . . . , along the first axis L1 from the left upper part of FIG. 2, for example, such that the stair-like shape extends along the first axis L1. The two adjacent first linear portions which define the angle θa have equal lengths.


Likewise, as for the second linear portions which constitute the second component 20a2 of the rib 20a, the direction of rotation by which the angle θa between adjacent two second linear portions is defined (denoted by small arrows in FIG. 1) alternately changes in the order of “counterclockwise”, “clockwise”, “counterclockwise”, along the second axis L2 from the right upper part of FIG. 2, for example, such that the stair-like shape extends along the second axis L2. The two adjacent second linear portions which define the angle θa have equal lengths. Note that the third component 20a3 that connects the first component 20a1 and the second component 20a2 is shared by the first component 20a1 and the second component 20a2 as apparent from FIG. 2.


Thus, the rib 20a is constituted of linear portions extending in the horizontal direction and linear portions extending in the vertical direction.


The alignment of liquid crystal molecules 30a is regulated such that they incline in a direction perpendicular to the rib 20a. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 2, the azimuth of the inclination of the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by linear portions of the rib 20a which are parallel to the vertical direction is identical with the horizontal direction. The azimuth of the inclination of the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by linear portions of the rib 20a which are parallel to the horizontal direction is identical with the vertical direction. The liquid crystal molecules 30a in a region between two adjacent linear portions are aligned with preserved continuity such that they conform to both the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated in the horizontal direction and the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated in the vertical direction. Thus, the liquid crystal molecules 30a in this region are oriented in the direction which bisects the angle θa between two adjacent linear portions, i.e., in a direction perpendicular to the first axis L1 or the second axis L2.


As a result, the liquid crystal molecules 30a in regions which are somewhat distant from the rib 20a are alignment-regulated by the stair-shaped first component 20a1 extending along the first axis L1 such that they are oriented in two azimuths indicated by arrows A and B in FIG. 2 and are alignment-regulated by the stair-shaped second component 20a2 extending along the second axis L2 such that they are oriented in two azimuths indicated by arrows C and D in FIG. 2. Thus, as in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device, four domains characterized by four directors that are represented by the four azimuths A, B, C, and D are formed.


It should be noted herein that the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by the surface of the rib 20a are oriented parallel or perpendicular to the polarization axis PP. Specifically, the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by the surface of the rib 20a do not retard (do not have a retardation for) linear polarization that enters the liquid crystal layer 30 after being transmitted through the polarizing plate with the polarization axis PP. Therefore, in the liquid crystal display device 100a, no leakage of light occurs in the vicinity of the rib 20a even in the black displaying state. Note that the same applies to the case where the arrangement of the polarization axes PP and PA of the pair of polarizing plates is contrary.


Now, the reasons why leakage of light occurs in the black displaying state in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device are described with reference to FIGS. 17 and 18.



FIG. 17 is a schematic diagram which illustrates the azimuth of the orientations of the liquid crystal molecules 30a in the vicinity of a linearly-extending rib 20 in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device. FIG. 18 shows the result of a simulation of leakage of light in the black displaying state which may occur in the vicinity of the rib 20.


As shown in FIG. 17, in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device, the rib 20 is constituted of two linear portions extending in two mutually-orthogonal directions that bisect the angles between the polarization axes PP and PA of the pair of polarizing plates (90°). The whole shape of the rib 20 is a “<”-shape. Therefore, the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by the surface of the rib 20 are oriented to form an angle of 45° with the polarization axis PP. Thus, the four directors with the azimuths A to D can be efficiently formed.


However, the alignment regulating force provided by the surface of the rib 20 is present even in the absence of an applied voltage, and therefore, the liquid crystal molecules 30a in the vicinity of the rib 20 incline relative to a direction normal to the substrate surface even in the absence of an applied voltage. Since the azimuth of the inclination of the liquid crystal molecules 30a forms an angle of 45° with (is not parallel or perpendicular to) the polarization axis PP, the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by the surface of the rib 20a retard (have a retardation for) linear polarization that enters the liquid crystal layer 30 after being transmitted through the polarizing plate with the polarization axis PP. As a result, in the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device, a bright area BA is formed along the rib 20 in the black displaying state as shown in FIG. 18, so that leakage of light occurs. This leakage of light is a major factor which deteriorates the contrast ratio of the liquid crystal display device.


On the other hand, the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a of the embodiment of the present invention is constituted of linear portions which are parallel or perpendicular to the polarization axis PP as previously described. Therefore, the liquid crystal molecules 30a alignment-regulated by the surface of the rib 20 do not retard linear polarization that enters the liquid crystal layer 30 after being transmitted through the polarizing plate with the polarization axis PP. Thus, no leakage of light occurs in the black displaying state.


The stair-like shape of the rib 20b of the liquid crystal display device 100b shown in FIG. 1(b) is different from the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a in that the vertex portions of the right isosceles triangles are in the form of a circular arc. However, the rib 20b functions in basically the same way as the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a. Note that the circular arc portion causes the liquid crystal molecules 30a to orient in the azimuth which forms an angle of 45° with the polarization axis PP. The circular arc portion is preferably short. It is not absolutely necessary to provide the circular arc portion. Note that when photolithographically forming the rib 20a of the liquid crystal display device 100a using a photosensitive resin, for example, a circular arc portion may be formed.


Next, the functions of the rib 20c of the liquid crystal display device 100c and the rib 20d of the liquid crystal display device 100d are described with reference to FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b). FIG. 3(a) is a schematic diagram which illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20c. FIG. 3(b) is a schematic diagram which illustrates the relationship between the structure and the function of the rib 20d.


The stair-shaped rib 20c shown in FIG. 3(a) is different from the rib 20a shown in FIG. 2 in that, as previously described, the angle between adjacent linear portions, θc, is an obtuse angle (more than 90° and less than 180°). As θc increases from 90°, the deviation of the angle between the linear portion of the rib 20c and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases. As the deviation of the angle between the linear portions of the rib 20c and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases, the angle between the liquid crystal molecules alignment-regulated by the linear portions and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases, and accordingly, the leakage of light increases. If 9c is less than 180°, the leakage of light can be reduced as compared with the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device which has the linear rib 20 shown in FIG. 17. To sufficiently reduce the leakage of light, however, θc is preferably 109° or less (as will be described later with reference to FIG. 16).


The stair-shaped rib 20d shown in FIG. 3(b) is different from the rib 20a shown in FIG. 2 in that, as previously described, the angle between adjacent linear portions, θd, is an acute angle (not less than 50° and less than 90°). As θd decreases from 90°, the deviation of the angle between the linear portion of the rib 20d and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases. As the deviation of the angle between the linear portions of the rib 20d and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases, the angle between the liquid crystal molecules alignment-regulated by the linear portions and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular) increases, and accordingly, the leakage of light increases. If θd is less than 90°, the leakage of light due to the increase in the length of the rib 20d increases as θd decreases. As will be described later with reference to FIG. 16, if θd is 50° or more, the leakage of light can be reduced as compared with the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device which has the linear rib shown in FIG. 17. However, to sufficiently reduce the leakage of light, θd is preferably 74° or more.


In the ribs 20c and 20d shown in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), the third components 20c3 and 20d3 respectively extend in a different direction from the first component or the second component and are not included in any of the first and second components. Both the components 20c3 and 20d3 are linear portions extending in the vertical direction and cause no leakage of light.


The ribs 20c and 20d shown in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) may have a circular arc portion between two adjacent linear portions as in the rib 20b of FIG. 1(b). Alternatively, the circular arc portion may be replaced by a gap.


In the above-described ribs 20a to 20d, the first component extending along the first axis L1 and the second component extending along the second axis L2 have substantially the same structure Specifically, the first component and the second component are in a relationship of mirror images relative to a horizontal axis or in a relationship of rotation by 90°. However, the shape of the ribs is not limited to this configuration. The first component and the second component each may have any of the above-described shapes. Specifically, the ribs 20a, 20b, 20c, and 20d may be configured such that the first components 20a1, 20b1, 20c1, and 20d1 of the ribs 20a, 20b, 20c, and 20d each have three or more first linear portions, that two adjacent first linear portions form an angle of θ1 where 50°≦θ1<180°, that the direction which bisects θ1 is generally perpendicular to the first axis, that the second components 20a2, 20b2, 20c2, and 20d2 of the ribs 20a, 20b, 20c, and 20d each have three or more second linear portions, that two adjacent second linear portions form an angle of θ2 where 50°≦θ1<180°, and that the direction which bisects θ2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.


As apparent from FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the directions which bisect angles θ1 and θ2 between two adjacent linear components are preferably perpendicular to corresponding one of the first axis L1 or the second axis L2. Also, the two adjacent first linear portions which define θ1 preferably have equal lengths, and the two adjacent second linear portions which define θ2 preferably have equal lengths. In other words, if all of the above conditions are met, the alignment regulating forces exerted on liquid crystal molecules by two adjacent linear components are equal, so that the orientation of the liquid crystal molecules in a region between these linear components is coincident with the direction which bisects angle θ1, θ2 between the two adjacent linear components, and this orientation is coincident with a direction perpendicular to the first axis L1 or the second axis L2. Note that, in order to obtain the effect of reducing leakage of light which is obtained by the stair-like shape of the rib, the direction which bisects angle θ1, θ2 between the two adjacent linear components does not need to be strictly perpendicular to corresponding one of the first axis L1 or the second axis L2. Also, the two adjacent linear components may not have equal lengths.


Next, a configuration including the rib 20a formed by two sides of right isosceles triangles which form vertex angles as previously described with reference to FIG. 1(a) and FIG. 2 is examined as to the effects of the pitch and width of the rib 20a. Note that the pitch of the rib 20a refers to a pitch along the first axis L1 or the second axis L2 in which the stair-shaped rib 20a extends. The width of the rib 20a refers to the width of each linear portion (the length along a direction perpendicular to the direction in which the linear portion extends).


The relationship between the structure of the rib 20a and the transmittance distribution was evaluated by simulation using three-dimensional liquid crystal director/electric field/optical computation software (LCD Master 3DFEM Version 4.8 manufactured by SHINTECH Inc.).


First, a simulation as to the transmittance distribution was performed on the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device with linear ribs, which is a comparative example.



FIG. 4 shows a two-dimensional cross-sectional structure of a structural unit 100p of a liquid crystal display device used in the simulation. The structural unit 100p used herein is part of one pixel. For example, it is part of one pixel which includes only the first component extending along the first axis of a rib (e.g., corresponding to reference numeral 20a1 of FIG. 1(a)). The horizontal direction of FIG. 4 is perpendicular to the first axis L1.


In FIG. 4, the structure includes, from the top, a polarizing plate 16, a glass substrate 21, a counter electrode (ITO film) 22, the rib 20, a liquid crystal layer 30, a pixel electrode (ITO film) 12, a glass substrate 11, and a polarizing plate 15. Vertical alignment films provided over the rib 20 and a side of the counter electrode 22 which is closer to the liquid crystal layer 30 and over a side of the pixel electrode 12 which is closer to the liquid crystal layer 30 are not shown herein.


The two-dimensional size of the structural unit 100p was vertical×horizontal=100 μm×100 μm. The cell gap was 3.4 μm. The liquid crystal material was a negative-type nematic liquid crystal material. The retardation of the liquid crystal layer 30 was 320 nm. The pretilt angle of liquid crystal molecules at the interface in the absence of an applied voltage was 90°. The thickness of the ITO films of the counter electrode 22 and the pixel electrode 12 was 0 μm. The two-dimensional size of the counter electrode 22 was vertical×horizontal=100 μm×100 μm. The two-dimensional size of the pixel electrode 12 was vertical×horizontal=100 μm×64 μm. The reason why the lateral size of the pixel electrode 12 was smaller than the lateral size of the counter electrode 22 is that non-electrode portions on opposite sides of the pixel electrode 12 shown in FIG. 4 are adjusted to slits formed in the pixel electrode of an actual liquid crystal display device. Specifically, FIG. 4 shows, for example, a cross-sectional structure of a portion corresponding to a region shown in FIG. 1(a) including the first component 20a1 of the rib 20a and the first components 10a1 of the slits 10a that are provided on opposite sides of the first component 20a1, the cross-sectional structure being taken along a direction perpendicular to the first axis L1 (see FIG. 2). The polarization axes of the polarizing plates 15 and 16 extend in directions which form the angles of 45° with the first axis L1. The height of the rib was 1.2 μm. The relative dielectric constant of the rib was 3.7. The taper angle was 64.2°.


The common parameters used in the simulation are shown below in TABLE 1.













TABLE 1









Height of Rib
1.2
(μm)



Taper Angle of Rib
64.2
(°)



Relative Dielectric Constant of Rib
3.7



Vertical Length of Counter Electrode
100.0
(μm)



Horizontal Length of Counter
100.0
(μm)



Electrode



Thickness of Counter Electrode
0.0
(μm)



Vertical Length of Pixel Electrode
100.0
(μm)



Horizontal Length of Pixel Electrode
64.0
(μm)



Thickness of Pixel Electrode
0.0
(μm)



Cell Gap
3.4
(μm)



Retardation of Liquid Crystal Layer
320.0
(nm)










First, as a comparative example, the simulation as to the transmittance distribution was performed on the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device with linear ribs.



FIG. 5 shows the linear rib 20 of the conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display device which is seen in a direction normal to the substrate. Note that, in this simulation, the 30 μm areas at the top and the bottom of the structural unit 100p were shielded by shields 62 as shown in FIG. 6. This is for the purpose of removing the effects of oblique electric fields generated at the edge portions of the pixel electrode 12 and the counter electrode 22. Note that the polarization axes PP and PA of the pair of polarizing plates form angles of 45° with the direction in which the rib 20 extends.



FIGS. 7(
a) and 7(b) show the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p which were obtained by the simulation of Comparative Example. FIG. 7(a) shows the distribution for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V). FIG. 7(b) shows the distribution for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).


As seen from FIG. 7(a), two bright areas BA (leakage light) are clearly seen along the linear rib in the black displaying state. As seen from FIG. 7(b), a dark area DA is formed in the region in which the rib is provided in the white displaying state. The liquid crystal molecules in the central part of the rib do not incline in any direction and maintain their orientations near to the vertical alignment, so that they are observed as the darkest line. The transmittance across the entire structural unit 100p of Comparative Example was 0.000059 in the black displaying state, and 0.094548 in the white displaying state.


Note that, in the software LCD Master, the transmittance of the polarizing plates in a crossed Nicols arrangement is not 0% but is determined with consideration for leakage of light from the pair of polarizing plates. Here, the simulation intends to quantitatively evaluate the effect of improving leakage light which can be achieved by changing the shape of the rib, and therefore, leakage of light from the polarizing plates which is automatically considered in LCD Master is preferably omitted. The transmittance of 0.000030 for an applied voltage of 0.0 V, which was calculated by the simulation performed on the above-described configuration of Comparative Example from which however the rib was removed, was assumed as the transmittance of (leakage light from) the pair of polarizing plates, and 0.000030 was subtracted from the transmittance values obtained by simulations. The values from which the effect of leakage of light from the pair of polarizing plates in a crossed Nicols arrangement has not yet been removed are sometimes referred to as “pre-correction” values, and the values from which the effect of leakage of light has been removed are sometimes referred to as “post-correction” values.


Thus, the post-correction transmittance of Comparative Example, from which the effect of leakage of light from the pair of polarizing plates in a crossed Nicols arrangement has been removed, is 0.000029 (=0.000059−0.000030) in the black displaying state, and is 0.094518 (=0.094548−0.000030) in the white displaying state.


The black luminance, the white luminance, and the contrast ratio of the liquid crystal display device of Comparative Example were actually measured. The black luminance was 0.2020 [cd], the white luminance was 500 [cd], and the contrast ratio was 2475. As for the black luminance, 0.0910 [cd] out of 0.2020 [cd] is the amount of leakage light due to the rib. The remaining 0.111 [cd] is the total of leakage light from elements other than the rib, such as color filters, various bus lines, and slits of the pixel electrode. These values were obtained by actually measuring the black luminance of respective liquid crystal cells fabricated for evaluation, each of which includes the respective components.


Next, the simulation was performed on the structural units of Examples 1 to 4 with only the parameters relevant to the rib of the structural unit 100p which have been previously described for Comparative Example being varied. The respective parameters of Examples are shown in TABLE 2. The results are shown in TABLE 3 and TABLE 4.













TABLE 2







Shape
Pitch (μm)
Width (μm)





















Comparative
Linear

10.96



Example 1
Stair-shaped
40
10.96



Example 2
Stair-shaped
20
10.96



Example 3
Stair-shaped
10
10.96



Example 4
Stair-shaped
10
5.48










EXAMPLE 1

In the structural unit 100p of Example 1, the pitch of the stair-shaped rib 20A was 40 μm as shown in FIG. 8. The width and height of the rib 20A were equal to those of Comparative Example. FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) show the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p, which were obtained by the simulation of Example 1. FIG. 9(a) shows the distribution for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V). FIG. 9(b) shows the distribution for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).


As seen from FIG. 9(a), the bright area BA which was formed due to the rib was distributed in the form of dots, whereas it was linear in Comparative Example (see FIG. 7(a)). The bright area BA in the form of dots was formed at positions corresponding to the vertexes of the stair-like shape. As a result, the transmittance value of the entire structural unit 100p of Example 1 was 0.000001 in the black displaying state, which means an improvement of about 97% as compared with. Comparative Example.


On the other hand, the transmittance in the white displaying state was 0.060394, which was smaller than that of Comparative Example by about 36%. This is because, as understood from FIG. 9(b), large part of the liquid crystal molecules in the vicinity of the rib are more susceptible to the alignment regulating force of the rib, so that they cannot sufficiently respond to electric fields and maintain themselves oriented in a direction parallel to or perpendicular to the polarization axis PP.


From the transmittance obtained by simulation, the black luminance, the white luminance, and the contrast ratio were calculated as described below.







Black





Luminance

=



(





(

Amount





of





Leakage





Light





from





Rib





of





Comparative





Example

)

×







(

Transmittance





of





Example





1





in





Black





Displaying





State

)


(





Transmittance





of





Comparative





Example











in





Black





Displaying





State




)





)

+

(

Amount





of





Leakage





Light





from





Non


-


rib





Elements

)


=



(

0.0910
×

0.000001
/
0.000029


)

+
0.111

=



0.1141


[
cd
]








White





Luminance


=


(





(

White





Luminance





of





Comparative











Example

)

×







(

Transmittance





of





Example





1





in





White





Displaying





State

)


(




Transmittance





of





Comparative





Example






in





White





Displaying





State




)





)

=


500
×

0.060394
/
0.094518


=



320


[
cd
]







Contrast





Ratio

=



320


[
cd
]


/

0.1141


[
cd
]



=
2800











Thus, in Example 1, the black luminance decreased from 0.2020 to 0.1141 [cd], which was a decrease of about 43%, although the white luminance decreased from 500 to 320 [cd], which was a decrease of about 36%. Accordingly, the contrast ratio increased from 2475 to 2800, which was an increase of about 13%.


EXAMPLE 2

In the structural unit 100p of Example 2, the pitch of the stair-shaped rib 20B was 20 μm as shown in FIG. 10. The width and height of the rib 20B were equal to those of Comparative Example. FIGS. 11(a) and 11(b) show the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p, which were obtained by the simulation of Example 2. FIG. 11(a) shows the distribution for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V). FIG. 11(b) shows the distribution for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).


As seen from FIG. 11(a), the bright area BA which was formed due to the rib was distributed in the form of dots, whereas it was linear in Comparative Example (see FIG. 7(a)). The number of dots of the bright area BA was larger than that of Example 1 (FIG. 9(a)) because of the increased number of steps of the stair. However, the transmittance value in the black displaying state was 0.000001, which was equal to that of Example 1 and which means an improvement of about 97% as compared with Comparative Example.


On the other hand, the transmittance in the white displaying state was 0.080629, which was smaller than that of Comparative Example by about 15%. However, the rate of decrease was lower than that of Example 1. This is because, as understood from FIG. 11(b), the extent in which the alignment regulating force of the rib 20B was operative decreased due to the increased number of steps of the stair, and accordingly, the number of liquid crystal molecules which maintain their orientations parallel or perpendicular to the polarization axis PP decreased, so that the response of the liquid crystal molecules was improved.


From the transmittance obtained by simulation, the black luminance, the white luminance, and the contrast ratio were calculated as described above. The black luminance was 0.1141 [cd]. The white luminance was 432 [cd]. The contrast ratio was 3737. The black luminance was equal to that of Example 1. The white luminance was smaller than that of Comparative Example by about 15%. However, the contrast ratio was higher than that of Comparative Example by about 51%.


EXAMPLE 3

In the structural unit 100p of Example 3, the pitch of the stair-shaped rib 20C was 10 μm as shown in FIG. 12. The width and height of the rib 20C were equal to those of Comparative Example. FIGS. 13(a) and 13(b) show the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p, which were obtained by the simulation of Example 3. FIG. 13(a) shows the distribution for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V). FIG. 13(b) shows the distribution for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).


As seen from FIG. 13(a), the bright area BA was distributed in the form of dots as in Examples 1 and 2. The number of dots of the bright area BA was still larger than that of the rib 20B of Example 2 because of the still increased number of steps of the stair. The transmittance value in the black displaying state was 0.000003, which means an improvement of about 90% as compared with Comparative Example.


On the other hand, the transmittance in the white displaying state was 0.088755, which was smaller than that of Comparative Example by about 6%. The rate of decrease was still lower than that of Example 2. This is because, as understood from FIG. 13(b), the extent in which the alignment regulating force of the rib 20C was operative further decreased due to the still increased number of steps of the stair, so that the response of the liquid crystal molecules was improved.


From the transmittance obtained by simulation, the black luminance, the white luminance, and the contrast ratio were calculated as described above. The black luminance was 0.1204 [cd]. The white luminance was 470 [cd]. The contrast ratio was 3899. The black luminance was slightly smaller than those of Examples 1 and 2. However, the rate of decrease of the white luminance was only about 6% relative to Comparative Example. The contrast ratio increased by about 58%.


EXAMPLE 4

In the structural unit 100p of Example 4, as shown in FIG. 14, the pitch of the stair-shaped rib 20D was 10 μm, and the width of the rib 20D was a half of that of Comparative Example. The height of the rib 20D was equal to that of Comparative Example. FIGS. 15(a) and 15(b) show the transmittance distributions within the structural unit 100p, which were obtained by the simulation of Example 4. FIG. 15(a) shows the distribution for the black displaying state (applied voltage: 0.0 V). FIG. 15(b) shows the distribution for the white displaying state (applied voltage: 7.5 V).


As seen from FIG. 15(a), the number of dots of the bright area BA was still larger as in Example 3. The transmittance value in the black displaying state was 0.000004, which means an improvement of about 86% as compared with Comparative Example.


On the other hand, the transmittance in the white displaying state was 0.094034, which was smaller than that of Comparative Example by about 0.5%. The rate of decrease was still lower than that of Example 3. This is because, as understood from FIG. 15(b), the extent in which the alignment regulating force of the rib 20D was operative further decreased as compared with Example 3, so that the response of the liquid crystal molecules was further improved.


From the transmittance obtained by simulation, the black luminance, the white luminance, and the contrast ratio were calculated. The black luminance was 0.1236 [cd]. The white luminance was 497 [cd]. The contrast ratio was 4021. The black luminance was slightly smaller than those of Examples 1 to 3. However, the rate of decrease of the white luminance was only about 0.5% relative to Comparative Example, which can be considered as a minor error. The contrast ratio was improved by as much as about 62%.


The results of the simulations of Comparative Example and Examples 1 to 4 are shown together in TABLE 3 and TABLE 4.













TABLE 3









RIB
TRANSMITTANCE
TRANSMITTANCE












WIDTH
PITCH
(PRE-CORRECTION)
(POST-CORRECTION)*1















SHAPE
(μm)
(μm)
0.0 V
7.5 V
0.0 V
7.5 V


















COMPARATIVE
NONE


0.000030





EXAMPLE


WITHOUT RIB


COMPARATIVE
LINEAR
10.96

0.000059
0.094548
0.000029
0.094518


EXAMPLE


EXAMPLE 1
STAIR-
10.96
40
0.000031
0.060424
0.000001
0.060394



SHAPED


EXAMPLE 2
STAIR-
10.96
20
0.000031
0.080659
0.000001
0.080629



SHAPED


EXAMPLE 3
STAIR-
10.96
10
0.000033
0.088785
0.000003
0.088755



SHAPED


EXAMPLE 4
STAIR-
5.48
10
0.000034
0.094064
0.000004
0.094034



SHAPED





*1The value of transmittance (pre-correction) minus transmittance of Comparative Example without rib (=0.000030).

















TABLE 4









BLACK LUMINANCE














LEAKAGE
TOTAL OF
WHITE LUMINANCE
CONTRAST RATIO














LIGHT DUE
LEAKAGE

RATE OF

RATE OF



TO RIB
LIGHT*2

DECREASE

INCREASE



(cd)
(cd)
(cd)
(%)

(%)

















COMPARATIVE
0.0910
0.2020
500
0.00
2475
0.00


EXAMPLE


EXAMPLE 1
0.0031
0.1141
320
36.09
2800
13.10


EXAMPLE 2
0.0031
0.1141
427
14.69
3737
50.98


EXAMPLE 3
0.0094
0.1204
470
6.10
3899
57.53


EXAMPLE 4
0.0126
0.1236
497
0.51
4021
62.46





*2Including total of leakage light from non-rib elements, such as color filters, bus lines, and ITO electrode slits (=0.111[cd]).






As apparent from the above descriptions, the stair-shaped rib preferably has a smaller pitch. It is preferably not more than 10 μm. The rib preferably has a smaller width. It is preferably less than 10 μm, and is more preferably not more than 6 μm.


In the configuration described above, the rib 20a is formed by two sides which form vertex angles (θa=90°) of right isosceles triangles as described with reference to FIG. 1(a) and FIG. 2. Next, the preferable range of the vertex angle θ of the isosceles triangles which form the stair-like shape is described with reference to FIG. 16.


Black luminance values obtained from the above results of Comparative Example)(θ=180° and Example 4)(θ=90°) are:





Black Luminance MAX=Black Luminance)(180°=0.0910 [cd];





Black Luminance MIN=Black Luminance)(90°=0.0126 [cd];


and





Δ Black Luminance=Black Luminance)(180°−Black Luminance) (90°)=0.0784 [cd].


Black Luminance (θ), which is a function of the vertex angle θ, is given as Black Luminance (θ)=Black Luminance) (90°)+Black Luminance×cos2/cos(90°−θ/2)+(Amount of Leakage Light from Non-rib Elements).


Here, in the term of ΔBlack Luminance×cos2θ/cos(90°−θ/2), “cos2θ” represents the change in leakage light due to the deviation of the angle between the rib (entirely constituted of linear portions) and the polarization axis PP from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular), and “cos(90°−θ/2)” represents the length of the rib which depends on the vertex angle θ. By replacing “Black Luminance)(90°)”, “ΔBlack Luminance”, and “Amount of Leakage Light from Non-rib Elements” with the above values and using cos(90°−θ/2)=sin(θ/2), Black Luminance (θ) can be expressed as:










Black





Luminance






(
θ
)


=

0.0126
+

0.0784






cos
2



θ
/

sin


(

θ
/
2

)




+

0.111


[
cd
]









=

0.1236
+

0.0784






cos
2



θ
/



sin


(

θ
/
2

)




[
cd
]


.











White luminance values obtained in the same way from the above results of Comparative Example)(θ=180° and Example 4 (θ=90° are:





White Luminance MAX−White Luminance) (180°)=500 [cd];





White Luminance MIN=White Luminance) (90°)=497 [cd]; and





Δ White Luminance=White Luminance) (180°)−White Luminance (90°)=3 [cd].


Here, the dependence of the white luminance on the vertex angle θ is small (3 cd corresponds to 0.6%). Thus, the white luminance is approximated at a constant value of 500 cd irrespective of the vertex angle θ.


The contrast ratio is given as White Luminance/Black Luminance. Thus,





Contrast Ratio (θ)=500/{0.1236+0.0784 cos2θ/sin(θ/2)}.



FIG. 16 is a graph in which the contrast ratio (θ) is plotted over the vertex angle θ. Note that, when θ<50°, the contrast ratio is not more than the contrast ratio of Comparative Example, 2475, and hence, the graph shows the contrast ratio within the range of θ≧50°.


In the stair-shaped rib, if the angle between the rib and the polarization axis PP deviates from 0° (parallel) or 90° (perpendicular), the amount of leakage light increases. When θ<90°, the length of the rib increases, and accordingly, the amount of leakage light increases. Therefore, the graph of FIG. 16 is not symmetrical about θ=90°. In the range of θ<90°, the change in contrast ratio is sharper than in the range of θ>90°. Around θ=50°, the contrast ratio is equal to that of Comparative Example.


As understood from FIG. 16, in the range of 74°≦θ109°, the contrast ratio which can be achieved herein is not less than 1.5 times the contrast ratio of Comparative Example, 2475. In the range of 85°≦θ≦96°, a high contrast ratio can be obtained such that the decrease from the maximum contrast ratio which can be obtained in Example 4 is 1% or less.


Note that, as the vertex angle θ decreases, the difference between the orientation (azimuth) of the liquid crystal molecules in the vicinity of the rib and the orientation (azimuth) of the liquid crystal molecules in the vicinity of the slit increases. When the difference of the orientations of the liquid crystal molecules is large, the orientations of the liquid crystal molecules in the white displaying state deviate from the azimuths of 45° relative to the polarization axes, so that the viewing angle characteristics deteriorate. Therefore, the vertex angle e is preferably determined with consideration for the balance between the contrast ratio and the viewing angle characteristics. For example, to achieve a contrast ratio not less than 1.5 times the contrast ratio of Comparative Example, the range of 85≦θ≦109° is preferable.


The results shown herein are for the case where the first component and the second component of the stair-shaped rib extending in mutually orthogonal directions have equal vertex angles (θ1=θ2) as shown in FIGS. 1(a) to 1(d). However, as a matter of course, the preferable range of the vertex angle θ may be determined independently in each case.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

The present invention is applicable to a wide variety of conventional MVA mode liquid crystal display devices, typically including TV applications.


REFERENCE SIGNS LIST




  • 10
    a first linear alignment control structure (slit)


  • 10
    a
    1 first component of first linear alignment control structure


  • 10
    a
    2 second component of first linear alignment control structure


  • 11, 21 glass substrate


  • 12 pixel electrode (ITO film)


  • 15, 16 polarizing plate


  • 20 rib


  • 20
    a, 20b, 20c, 20d second linear alignment control structure (stair-shaped rib)


  • 20
    a
    1, 20b1, 20c1, 20d1 first component of second linear alignment control structure


  • 20
    a
    2, 20b2, 20c2, 20d2 second component of second linear alignment control structure


  • 20
    a
    3, 20b3, 20c3, 20d3 third component of second linear alignment control structure


  • 22 counter electrode (ITO film)


  • 30 liquid crystal layer


  • 30
    a liquid crystal molecules


  • 100
    a, 100b, 100c, 100d liquid crystal display device


  • 100
    p structural unit (part of pixel)

  • L1 first axis

  • L2 second axis


Claims
  • 1. A liquid crystal display device including a plurality of pixels, comprising: a first substrate; a second substrate; a vertical alignment type liquid crystal layer interposed between the first substrate and the second substrate; a first electrode provided on a side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer; a second electrode provided on a side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer; and a pair of polarizing plates opposing each other with the liquid crystal layer interposed therebetween, the polarizing plates being in a crossed Nicols arrangement, wherein each of the plurality of pixels includes a plurality of first linear alignment control structures provided on the side of the first substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer and a plurality of second linear alignment control structures provided on the side of the second substrate which is closer to the liquid crystal layer,the plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures each include a first component extending along a first axis and a second component extending along a second axis that is different from the first axis, each of the first axis and the second axis being an axis which bisects an angle between the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates,at least one group of the plurality of first linear alignment control structures and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of linear dielectric protrusions,the first component of the plurality of linear dielectric protrusions includes three or more first linear portions arranged along the first axis, the three or more first linear portions being arranged such that adjacent two of the three or more first linear portions form an angle of θ1 where 50°≦θ1<180° and that a direction which bisects θ1 is generally perpendicular to the first axis, andthe second component of the plurality of linear dielectric protrusions includes three or more second linear portions arranged along the second axis, the three or more second linear portions being arranged such that adjacent two of the three or more second linear portions form an angle of θ2 where 50°≦θ2<180° and that a direction which bisects θ2 is generally perpendicular to the second axis.
  • 2. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein the adjacent two first linear portions which define θ1 have equal lengths, and the adjacent two second linear portions which define θ2 have equal lengths.
  • 3. The liquid crystal display device of claim 2, wherein all of the three or more first linear portions and the three or more second linear portions have equal lengths.
  • 4. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein θ1 and θ2 are each independently not less than 74° and not more than 109°.
  • 5. The liquid crystal display device of claim 4, wherein θ1 and θ2 are each independently not less than 85° and not more than 96°.
  • 6. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein θ1=θ2.
  • 7. The liquid crystal display device of claim 6, wherein θ1 and θ2 are about 90°.
  • 8. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein the three or more first linear portions and the three or more second linear portions are arranged with the pitch of not more than 10 μm.
  • 9. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of first linear alignment control structures are a plurality of slits provided in the first electrode, and the plurality of second linear alignment control structures are a plurality of linear dielectric protrusions provided on a side of the second electrode which is closer to the liquid crystal layer.
  • 10. The liquid crystal display device of claim 1, wherein one of the polarization axes of the pair of polarizing plates is identical with a horizontal direction of a display plane.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2008-105006 Apr 2008 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/JP2009/001665 4/10/2009 WO 00 10/13/2010