Surfactant-based products such as body washes, shampoos, dishwashing detergents, laundry detergents, and automotive detergents, among others, are often thickened by utilizing high concentration of surfactants, by combining viscosity synergistic surfactants, or by combining the surfactants with small amounts of salts, such as sodium salts. These formulations result in high viscosity products that appear rich and smooth but they are limited in that they do not provide sufficient low shear viscosity to allow for suspension of particles. Such particulates might include aesthetic agents (decorative beads, pearlescents, air bubbles, fragrance beads, etc.) or active ingredients (insoluble enzymes, encapsulated actives such as moisturizers, zeolites, exfoliating agents (e.g. alpha hydroxyl and/or glycolic acids or polyethylene beads), vitamins (e.g. vitamin E)) etc. or both.
Conventional thickeners and suspension aids such as xanthan gum, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), and many types of polyacrylates do not function well in surfactant-thickened systems and often lead to a loss of transparency due to clouding, gelling, and/or phase separation or lack sufficient suspension properties. For example, xanthan gum imparts excellent suspension properties in certain body wash formulations with low surfactant-thickening but the gum often loses its suspension ability in systems with high surfactant thickening, usually resulting in a hazy, irregular appearance, and a grainy or lumpy texture. Cellulosic products (CMC, HEC, HPMC, etc.), as another example of conventional thickeners, provide unreliable suspension and have significant limitations with respect to surfactant compatibilities. Acrylates systems are common, however, these systems do not always achieve a sufficient clarity level, require high concentrations of polymer, and are not considered natural. Salts are often capable of increasing high shear viscosity in surfactant-thickened systems but do not impart long-term suspension ability.
There is presently a desire in the consumer products industry to provide for transparent surfactant-thickened systems with particulates suspended therein, as well as a suspension aid for high surfactant systems where many alternative thickeners will not function.
It has been discovered that microfibrous cellulose (MFC), bacterially derived or otherwise, can be used to provide suspension of particulates in surfactant-thickened systems as well as in formulations with high surfactant concentrations. It was also discovered that the MFC may be used for this purpose with or without co-agents. When bacterially-derived microfibrous cellulose is utilized, cellular debris can be eliminated which results in transparent solutions at typical use levels.
The microfibrous cellulose appears unaffected by the surfactant micelle development and maintains good suspension in these systems. Microfibrous cellulose is unique in its ability to function in these systems in large part because it is dispersed rather than solubilized, thereby achieving the desired suspension properties in formulations that would otherwise display the hazing and/or precipitation often seen using alternative solubilized polymers.
Surfactant systems comprising microfibrous cellulose are described. “Surfactant systems” is intended to include but is not limited to surfactant-thickened and high surfactant systems. Microfibrous cellulose (MFC) includes MFC prepared by microbial fermentation or MFC prepared by mechanically disrupting/altering cereal, wood, or cotton-based cellulose fibers. When bacterially-derived microfibrous cellulose is utilized, cellular debris can be eliminated which results in transparent solutions at typical use levels. The present invention utilizes surfactants to achieve a very thick (highly viscous) system at high shear rates with particulates suspended therein by using microfibrous cellulose.
The surfactant concentration of these systems ranges from about 5% to about 50% (w/w active surfactant) wherein the specific concentration is product dependent. Body washes typically contain about 5% to about 15% (w/w) surfactant, dishwashing liquids typically contain about 20% to about 40% (w/w) surfactant (with 40% being an “ultra” concentrated product), and laundry detergents typically contain about 15% to about 50% (w/w) surfactant.
The MFC is present at concentrations from about 0.05% to about 1.0%, but the concentration will depend on the desired product. For example, while about 0.06% (w/w) MFC is preferred for suspending small alginate beads in a body wash, about 0.075% is preferred for suspending air bubbles in a body wash, and about 0.150% (w/w) is preferred for suspending either air bubbles or beads in a system containing about 40% (w/w) surfactant. Furthermore, the concentration of MFC will be adjusted accordingly if a highly transparent system is desired. Specifically, a very transparent body wash at about 5% to about 15% (w/w active surfactant) can be achieved with a MFC level of from about 0.055 to about 0.25% (w/w active surfactant).
Particulates to be suspended could include aesthetic agents (decorative beads, pearlescents, air bubbles, fragrance beads, etc.) or active ingredients (insoluble enzymes, encapsulated actives such as moisturizers, zeolites, exfoliating agents (e.g. alpha hydroxyl and/or glycolic acids or polyethylene beads), vitamins (e.g. vitamin E) etc. or both. Other suitable particulates would be apparent to one of skill in the art.
The invention is also directed to the use of co-agents and/or co-processing agents such as CMC, xanthan, and/or guar gum with the microfibrous cellulose in the surfactant systems described herein. Microfibrous cellulose blends are microfibrous cellulose products which contain co-agents. Two blends are described MFC, xanthan gum, and CMC in a ratio of 6:3:1, and MFC, guar gum, and CMC in a ratio of 3:1:1. These blends allow MFC to be prepared as a dry product which can be “activated” with high shear or high extensional mixing into water or other water-based solutions. “Activation” occurs when the MFC blends are added to water and the co-agents/co-processing agents are hydrated. After the hydration of the co-agents/co-processing agents, high shear is generally then needed to effectively disperse the microfibrous cellulose fibers to produce a three-dimensional functional network that exhibits a true yield point. Unexpectedly, the co-agent and/or co-processing agents CMC, xanthan, and/or guar gum present in these microfibrous cellulose blends appear to remain solubilized (after activation in water) in many high surfactant formulations despite their general lack of compatibility in the high surfactant systems, most likely due to the low use level of these polymers in these formulations with MFC.
The invention is further directed to methods of making the surfactant systems described, with or without co-agents and/or co-processing agents.
Body wash formulations demonstrating both the surfactant-thickening and suspension properties using a 0.125% MFC/xanthan/CMC (6:3:1) blend are described in Examples 1 and 2. The body washes exhibit very good clarity and the ability to suspend air bubbles and beads.
Manual dishwashing liquid and liquid laundry detergents, which have a higher surfactant level than found in body washes, are also described. Manual dishwashing liquids with alginate suspended therein are described in Example 3.
A liquid laundry detergent with fragrance beads suspended therein is described in Example 4.
A wet-cake form of microfibrous cellulose was used in Example 5 for preparing a high surfactant system comprising a concentrated liquid laundry soap with air bubbles suspended therein.
A liquid body wash with air bubbles was prepared.
Step A: Deionizied water, 10% NaCl solution, and Kathon® CG were added to a small Oster® mixing jar. Microfibrous cellulose (MFC/xanthan/CMC 6:3:1 blend) was added to the top of the water and then the Oster® mixer blade was assembled and the combination was mixed at top speed for 5 minutes (“Liquify” speed).
Step B: The contents were transferred to a 400 mL tall-form beaker with a paint mixing blade. Sodium laureth sulfate (JEELATE® ES-3) was added to the solution described in Step A and mixed at about 1000 rpm for 5 minutes. Sodium cocamidopropyl betaine (JEETERIC® CAB-LC) was then added to the mix and mixed an additional 5 minutes at 1000 rpm. Fragrance was then added.
Step C: Cocamide DEA was added to the solution described in Step B. Thickening occurred as more DEA was added. Citric Acid was then added as a 50% solution to reduce the pH to the desired level (pH 5.5 in this case). The contents were removed form the mixer. Air entrained during mixing was stabilized by the presence of the MFC/xanthan/CMC 6:3:1 blend.
A body wash was prepared as described in Example 1 but incorporated the suspension of beads instead of air bubbles. Alginate beads were added as the conclusion of step C. A visual representation of this embodiment can be seen in
High surfactant systems were prepared using manual dishwashing liquid and laundry detergent. Alginate beads or air was suspended in the solutions. Palmolive Ultra® dish soap was diluted in half to make a “normal” concentration dish soap. A concentrate was first prepared containing 0.25% microfibrous cellulose blend (MFC/xanthan/CMC 6:3:1 blend) in deionized water. The concentrate was made by mixing the solution in an Oster® blender at “liquefy” (top speed) for 5 minutes. The microfibrous cellulose mixture was then diluted 1:1 with Palmolive Ultra® detergent or Dawn Ultra® detergent (the Palmolive® contained 0.1% triclosan) using a paint mixing or propeller blade. The dish soap was added to the microfibrous cellulose solution while mixing. Excellent clarity and suspension of air and/or alginate beads were achieved for both the Palmolive Ultra® detergent and Dawn Ultra® detergent samples. The microfibrous cellulose diluted well notwithstanding the relative low shear of the paint or propeller mixing blade. The yield point for these solutions was about 2.5 Pa. A visual representation can be found in
A high surfactant system using a concentrated liquid laundry soap was prepared. “All Small and Mighty® three times concentrated” detergent was used. A 0.25% microfibrous cellulose blend (MFC/xanthan/CMC 6:3:1 blend) concentrate was activated in distilled water with an Oster® blender set at top speed (liquefy). Mix time was 5 minutes. The microfibrous cellulose solution was diluted 1:1 with All Small and Mighty® three times concentrated detergent. Very good clarity and suspension was achieved for the dilution resulting in a yield point of 0.62 Pa. The detergents were put in a 45° C. oven to assess heat stability and showed excellent stability with no loss in clarity or suspension over 4 weeks of aging. A visual representation can be seen in
A high surfactant system using a concentrated liquid laundry soap was prepared using the wet-cake version of microfibrous cellulose. “All Small and Mighty® three times concentrated” detergent was used. A 1.56% wet-cake microfibrous cellulose concentrate was activated in distilled water with an Oster® blender set at top speed (liquefy). Mix time was 5 minutes. The activity (% solids) of this wet-cake form of MFC was about 16% so the active MFC level was about 0.25% in the concentrate. The microfibrous cellulose solution was diluted 1:1 with All Small and Mighty® three times concentrated detergent. Very good suspension was achieved for the dilution resulting in a yield point of 13 Pa. A visual representation can be seen in
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/557,622, filed on Nov. 8, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3858854 | Win et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3975536 | Stevenson et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4378381 | Turbak et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4379059 | Hockey et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4452722 | Turbak et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4483743 | Turbak et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4500546 | Turbak et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
5087471 | Combes et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5441753 | McGinley et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5951910 | Skaggs | Sep 1999 | A |
5998349 | Guillou | Dec 1999 | A |
6224663 | Cantiani et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231651 | Schultz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241812 | Smith et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302209 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306207 | Cantiani et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6846785 | Patel et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6967027 | Heux et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7776807 | Canto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7888308 | Swazey | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7981855 | Palla-Venkata et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7994111 | Caggioni et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8097574 | Heath et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8361239 | Bettiol et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8470755 | Tajmamet et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8541355 | Fleckenstein et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8546318 | D'Ambrogio et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8642529 | Palla-Venkata et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8772359 | Swazey | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9045716 | Swazey | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20030109391 | Midha et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030162689 | Schymitzele | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040267006 | Yamane | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050119151 | Mayer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060029625 | Niebauer | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060083761 | Yoshimi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060110416 | Ryles et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060127345 | Hilvert et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060281859 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027108 | Yang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070197779 | Yang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080108541 | Swazey | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108714 | Swazey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090306254 | van der Wielen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100009891 | Canto et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016575 | Yang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110039744 | Heath et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110059883 | Swazey et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110104096 | Swazey | May 2011 | A1 |
20120122998 | Palla-Venkata et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120309662 | D'Ambrogio et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130274149 | Lafitte et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140128480 | Swazey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150240191 | Swazey | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150240193 | Swazey | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0859011 | Aug 1998 | EP |
2379223 | May 2003 | GB |
62172099 | Jul 1987 | JP |
6043600 | Jun 1994 | JP |
09165402 | Jun 1997 | JP |
11255806 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000026229 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2003095904 | Apr 2003 | JP |
9940153 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0047626 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0105837 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0105838 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0218486 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03062361 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03085074 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004074420 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005048986 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of Publ. No. JP 11-255806 A, published Sep. 1999, Japan Patent Office, Tokyo, Japan, online at https://dossier1.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp/tri/all/odse/ODSE_GM101_Top.action (Downloaded Jun. 26, 2017), pp. 1-13. |
Machine Translation of Publ. No. JP 09-165402 A, published Jun. 1997, Japan Patent Office, Tokyo, Japan, online at https://dossier1.j-platpat.inpit.go.jp/tri/all/odse/ODSE_GM101_Top.action (Downloaded Jun. 26, 2017), pp. 1-24. |
Ash, Michael Ash, Irene (2005:2008). Handbook of Industrial Surfactants (4th Edition), pp. 1596 & 5487, Synapse Information Resources, Inc.. Online version available at: http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpHISE000G/handbook-industrial-surfactants, (downloaded Oct. 17, 2013). |
Gangolli, S. (2005). Dictionary of Substances and Their Effects (DOSE, 3rd Electronic Edition). Royal Society of Chemistry, p. C381. Online version available at http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpDSTEDOS3/dictionary-substances (downloaded Oct. 17, 2013). |
Jeen International Corp., JEETERIC CAB-LC Coco-amido-N-propyl-Betaine, Technical data sheet, (revision date Mar. 1, 2001), p. 1 of 1, online @ http://www.jeen.com/technical/SPEC%20JEETERIC%20CAB-LC.pdf (downloaded Oct. 17, 2013). |
Australian Examination Report of Singapore 200903483-6, dated Jan. 25, 2011, Australian Patent Office, pp. 1-7. |
Extended European Search Report/Opinion of EP07863824.4, dated Mar. 9, 2011, EPO, The Hague, pp. 1-13. |
Chinese Office Action Application No. 200780041617.6 dated Dec. 21, 2010. |
PCT Search Report for PCT/US07/83422 dated Mar. 19, 2008. |
PCT Search Report for PCT/US07/87229 dated Apr. 9, 2008. |
Milton, Rosen J., “Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena”, Third Edition, (Published Online: Aug. 31, 2004), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, pp. 105-106, 120-121, 127-130, 138-139. |
European Search Report/Opinion of EP07865575, dated Dec. 1, 2011, EPO, The Hague, pp. 1-9. |
PCT/US2007/087216, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 6, 2008, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150240193 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11557622 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 14709092 | US |