Liquid electro-photographic (LEP) printing uses a special kind of ink to form images on paper and other print substrates. LEP ink includes charged polymer particles dispersed in a carrier liquid. The polymer particles are sometimes referred to as toner particles and, accordingly, LEP ink is sometimes called liquid toner. LEP ink usually also includes a charge control agent, called a “charge director”, that helps control the magnitude and polarity of the charge on the toner particles. In the LEP printing process, an electrostatic pattern of the desired printed image is formed on a photoconductor. This latent image is developed into a visible image by applying a thin layer of LEP ink to the patterned photoconductor. Charged toner particles in the ink adhere to the electrostatic pattern on the photoconductor. The ink image is transferred from the photoconductor to a heated intermediate transfer member, evaporating much of the carrier liquid to dry the ink film. The semi-solid ink film is then pressed on to the cooler print substrate and “frozen” in place at a nip between the intermediate transfer member and the substrate.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures.
A new LEP printing process has been developed in which the color ink layers are applied successively to the photoconductor one on top of another and then transferred to the intermediate transfer member (ITM) together as a single, composite ink image. In one example of the new process, the latent image for each successive ink layer is formed partly on the photoconductor and partly on the prior ink layer. Then, when the latent image is developed into an ink image, the ink will adhere to the prior, underlying ink as well as to the photoconductor. In one specific implementation, the prior ink layer on the photoconductor is separated into an inner region of mostly toner particles along the photoconductor and an outer region of mostly carrier liquid. The latent image for the next ink is formed by simultaneously charging the region of mostly carrier liquid as well as the photoconductor and then discharging select areas of both in a pattern corresponding to the desired image for the next ink.
Currently, most LEP printers use a process in which each of the color ink layers developed on the photoconductor is transferred individually from the photoconductor to the ITM and then from the ITM to the print substrate. Where four colors are used, CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow and black) for example, this conventional process is sometimes referred to as a “4 shot” process or a “1-1-4” process because the four colors are transferred individually from the photoconductor to the ITM and from the ITM to the print substrate where they are collected successively one on top of another to form the desired image.
One of the challenges implementing a 1-1-4 process is accurately aligning each successive ink layer to the underlying layer(s). The alignment of one ink layer to another ink layer is commonly referred to as “color plane registration.” A “1-4-1” process in which the ink layers are collected on the ITM and transferred to the print substrate as a single, composite has been used to help minimize color plane registration errors. In a 1-4-1 process, however, the underlying ink layers tend to dry out on the heated ITM waiting for all four layers to accumulate, causing poor transferability and inadequate adhesion to the print substrate. Optimizing the ITM to mitigate excessive drying while still maintaining good color plane registration can degrade color quality.
Examples of the new “4-1-1” LEP process help minimize color plane registration errors while maintaining good ink transferability and adhesion with high color quality. Ink layers are developed one on top of the other on the relatively cool photoconductor to avoid ink dry-out. The multi-layer composite developed on the photoconductor is transferred to the hot ITM where the carrier liquid evaporates and the toner particles fuse. With the new process, the ITM may be optimized for good ink transferability and adhesion alone without the need to also maintain good color plane registration and the attendant risk to color quality. Also, after transferring the ink to the print substrate, the ITM is allowed to rest three ink cycles before receiving the next transfer from the photoconductor, which helps the ITM recover from electrical or physical artifacts that cause unwanted ITM memories.
The examples shown in the figures and described herein illustrate but do not limit the invention which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
As used in this document, “LEP ink” means a liquid that includes toner particles in a carrier liquid suitable for electro-photographic printing.
During printing in LEP printer 10, a uniform electric charge is applied to a photoconductor 24, the photosensitive outer surface of a cylindrical drum for example, by a charging device 26 configured to charge photoconductor 24 from a distance. Because multiple ink layers are collected on photoconductor 24, charging device 26 is configured to charge photoconductor 24 and the underlying ink layers without damaging the ink. A scorotron or floating charge roller, for example, may be used for charging device 26. A scanning laser or other suitable photoimaging device 28 illuminates selected areas on photoconductor 24 and on the underlying ink layers to discharge the photoconductor and the ink in a pattern corresponding to the desired ink image. A thin layer of LEP ink is applied to the patterned photoconductor/ink using one of the developers 30, 32, 34, 36. Each developer 30-36 is a typically complex mechanism supplying a different color ink. In the example shown, four developers 30-36 supply yellow, cyan, magenta and black ink to photoconductor 24. The latent image on photoconductor 24 and on the underlying ink is developed into a visible, ink image through the application of ink that adheres to the charge pattern.
Once all of the ink layers are applied to photoconductor 24, the composite ink image is transferred to an intermediate transfer member (ITM) 38 and then from intermediate transfer member 38 to sheets or a web of print substrate 40 passing between intermediate transfer member 38 and a pressure roller 42. A lamp or other suitable discharging device 44 removes residual charge from photoconductor 24 and ink residue is removed at a cleaning station 46 after the ink image is transferred to intermediate transfer member 38 in preparation for developing the next image on photoconductor 24.
The uniformly charged photoconductor 24 is exposed to light, usually visible light, with a scanning laser or other suitable photoimaging device 28 to discharge select areas of photoconductor 24 to a lower voltage, about −70V for example, in a pattern corresponding to the desired image for the first color ink (step 104). Currently, yellow LEP ink is the most transparent and black LEP ink the least transparent to the imaging and discharge lights. Thus, it may be desirable in some implementations to apply yellow ink first and black ink last to photoconductor 24. Ink is applied to photoconductor 24 at developer 30 to “develop” the latent, discharged image on photoconductor 24 into a visible, first ink image 48 as shown in
Photoconductor 24 and yellow ink 48 are discharged to a uniform voltage, about −70V for example, as they pass a lamp or other suitable discharging device 44, as shown in
The infrared light photons create electron-hole pairs in photoconductor 24. Positive holes are attracted to the ink's negatively charged toner particles which become anchored to photoconductor 24, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In the example shown in
Referring again to
Referring again to
“A” and “an” as used in the Claims means one or more.
As noted at the beginning of this Description, the examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the invention. Other examples may be made and implemented. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5519473 | Morehouse | May 1996 | A |
5519476 | Dalal | May 1996 | A |
5561455 | Teshigawara | Oct 1996 | A |
5722017 | Caruthers, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724090 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5946533 | Omelchenko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6002907 | Berkes | Dec 1999 | A |
6097920 | Hara | Aug 2000 | A |
6205311 | Maess | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6352806 | Dalal | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6493530 | Ishii et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
7177571 | Sato et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20020051211 | Takahashi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020101493 | Tanaka | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030211412 | Ishii | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060067740 | Ishii | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080240755 | Shih | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110026991 | Izawa | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002123087 | Apr 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Grossinger; “Dual Color Development System”; Xerox Disclosure Journal; Xerox Corporation; vol. 13, No. 4; Jul. 1, 1988; XP000005049; Whole Document. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180107144 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14915529 | US | |
Child | 15845569 | US |