The present invention relates generally to micro electro-mechanical (MEM) liquid emission devices such as, for example, inkjet printing systems, and more particularly such devices which employ a thermal actuator in some aspect of drop formation.
Ink jet printing systems are one example of digitally controlled liquid emission devices. Ink jet printing systems are typically categorized as either drop-on-demand printing systems or continuous printing systems.
Until recently, conventional continuous ink jet techniques all utilized, in one form or another, electrostatic charging tunnels that were placed close to the point where the drops are formed in a stream. In the tunnels, individual drops may be charged selectively. The selected drops are charged and deflected downstream by the presence of deflector plates that have a large potential difference between them. A gutter (sometimes referred to as a “catcher”) is normally used to intercept the charged drops and establish a non-print mode, while the uncharged drops are free to strike the recording medium in a print mode as the ink stream is thereby deflected, between the “non-print” mode and the “print” mode.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,821, issued to Chwalek et al., Jun. 27, 2000, discloses an apparatus for controlling ink in a continuous ink jet printer. The apparatus includes a source of pressurized ink communicating with an ink delivery channel. A nozzle bore opens into the ink delivery channel to establish a continuous flow of ink in a stream with the nozzle bore defining a nozzle bore perimeter. A heater causes the stream to break up into a plurality of droplets at a position spaced from the nozzle bore. The heater has a selectively-actuated section associated with only a portion of the nozzle bore perimeter such that actuation of the heater section produces an asymmetric application of heat to the stream to control the direction of the stream between a print direction and a non-print direction.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,554,410 and 6,588,888, both of which issued to Jeanmaire et al., on Apr. 29, 2003 and Jul. 8, 2003, respectively, disclose continuous ink jet printing systems which use a gas flow to control the direction of the ink stream between a print direction and a non-print direction. Controlling the ink stream with a gas flow reduces the amount of energy consumed by the printing system.
Drop-on-demand printing systems incorporating a heater in some aspect of the drop forming mechanism are known. Often referred to as “bubble jet drop ejectors”, these mechanisms include a resistive heating element(s) that, when actuated (for example, by applying an electric current to the resistive heating element(s)), vaporize a portion of a liquid contained in a liquid chamber creating a vapor bubble. As the vapor bubble expands, liquid in the liquid chamber is expelled through a nozzle orifice. When the mechanism is de-actuated (for example, by removing the electric current to the resistive heating element(s)), the vapor bubble collapses allowing the liquid chamber to refill with liquid.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,460,961 B2, issued to Lee et al., on Oct. 8, 2002, discloses resistive heating elements that, when actuated, form a vapor bubble (or “virtual” ink chamber) around a nozzle orifice to eject ink through the nozzle orifice. However, these types of liquid emitting devices have nozzle orifices that share a common ink chamber. As such, adjacent nozzle orifices are susceptible to nozzle cross talk when corresponding resistive heating elements are actuated.
Attempts have been made to reduce nozzle cross talk. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,691 B1, issued to Lee et al., on Aug. 27, 2002, positions barriers at various locations in the common ink chamber. This, however, increases the complexity associated with manufacturing the liquid emitting device because the common ink chamber is maintained. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,102,530 and 6,273,553, issued to Kim et al., on Aug. 15, 2000, and Aug. 14, 2001, respectively, also attempt to reduce nozzle cross talk by offsetting each nozzle orifice relative to the common ink chamber. Doing this, however, provides only one refill port necessary to refill the portion of the ink chamber located under the nozzle orifice. Having only one refill port can reduce overall speeds associated with ejecting the liquid because the time associated with chamber refill is increased.
According to a feature of the present invention, a print head includes a body. Portions of the body define an ink delivery channel and other portions of the body defining a nozzle bore. The nozzle bore is in fluid communication with the ink delivery channel. An obstruction having an imperforate surface is positioned in the ink delivery channel.
According to another feature of the present invention, a print head includes a fluid delivery channel. A nozzle bore is in fluid communication with the fluid delivery channel. A heater is positioned proximate to the nozzle bore. An insulating material is located between the heater and at least one of the fluid delivery channel and the nozzle bore. An obstruction having an imperforate surface is positioned in the fluid delivery channel.
According to another feature of the present invention, a liquid emission device includes a body. Portions of the body define a fluid delivery channel. Other portions of the body define a nozzle bore. The nozzle bore is in fluid communication with the fluid delivery channel. An obstruction having an imperforate surface is positioned in the fluid delivery channel. A drop forming mechanism is operatively associated with the nozzle bore. An insulating material is positioned between drop forming mechanism and the body.
According to another feature of the present invention, a liquid emission device includes an ink delivery channel. A nozzle bore is in fluid communication with the ink delivery channel. An ink drop forming mechanism is operatively associated with the nozzle bore. An obstruction having an imperforate surface is positioned in the ink delivery channel.
The present description will be directed, in particular, to elements forming part of, or cooperating directly with, apparatus or processes of the present invention. It is to be understood that elements not specifically shown or described may take various forms well known to those skilled in the art.
As described herein, the present invention provides a liquid emission device and a method of operating the same. The most familiar of such devices are used as print heads in inkjet printing systems. The liquid emission device described herein can be operated in a continuous mode and/or in a drop-on-demand mode.
Many other applications are emerging which make use of devices similar to inkjet print heads, but which emit liquids (other than inks) that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision. As such, as described herein, the term liquid refers to any material that can be ejected by the liquid emission device described below.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The ink in the delivery channel emanates from pressurized reservoir 28 (shown in
Referring to
The deflection enhancement may be seen by comparing for example the margins of difference between θ1 of
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Obstruction 48 is positioned in delivery channel 30. Obstruction 48 can be centered over nozzle bore 56 with a lateral wall 64 that extends perpendicular to nozzle bore 56 as viewed along a plane that is perpendicular to nozzle bore 56, as shown in
A surface 66 of wall 64 is imperforate which causes fluid in delivery channel 30 to flow around obstruction 48 to arrive at and pass through nozzle bore 56. Imperforate surface 66 at least partially creates lateral flow 54 when ejection mechanism 22 is operated in a continuous manner, as described above. Imperforate surface 66 also at least partially creates ejection chamber 68 when ejection mechanism 22 is operated in a drop on demand manner, described below.
A vertical wall or walls 70 of obstruction 48 is positioned in delivery channel 30 at a location relative to nozzle bore 56 that causes surface 66 to overlap nozzle bore 56. This helps to further define ejection chamber 68 and/or create lateral flow 54. Alternatively, vertical wall(s) 70 can be located such that surface 66 extends through the diameter of nozzle bore 56, as shown in
Heater 24 is operatively associated with nozzle bore 56 and in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In another example embodiment, vapor bubble(s) 78 expand at least partially sealing ejection chamber 68 from delivery channels 30. The expansion of vapor bubble(s) 78 also forces fluid in ejection chamber 68 to be ejected through nozzle bore 56 in the form of a drop 80. The direction of vapor bubble(s) 78 expansion is opposite to the direction of drop 80 ejection. Vapor bubble(s) 78 collapse after heater 24 (or 74) is de-energized. This allows delivery channels 30 to refill ejection chamber 68. The process is repeated when an additional fluid drop(s) is desired.
In another example embodiment, vapor bubble(s) 78 expand and contact obstruction 48 (or a portion of wall 52) sealing ejection chamber 68 from delivery channels 30. The expansion of vapor bubble(s) 78 also forces fluid in ejection chamber 68 to be ejected through nozzle bore 56 in the form of a drop 80. The direction of vapor bubble(s) 78 expansion is opposite to the direction of drop 80 ejection. Vapor bubble(s) 78 collapse after heater 24 (or 74) is de-energized. This allows delivery channels 30 to refill ejection chamber 68. The process is repeated when an additional fluid drop(s) is desired.
Heater 24 (or 74) activation pulse can take the shape of any wave form (including period, amplitude, etc.) known in the industry. For example, heater 24 (or 74) activation pulse can be shaped like one of the waves forms, or a combination of the wave forms, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,728, issued to Vaught et al. on Dec. 25, 1984. However, other wave form shapes are also possible.
Although ejection mechanism 22 can be fabricated such that one or more delivery channels 30 feed ejection chamber 68, it has been discovered that two delivery channels 30 adequately allow ejection chamber 68 to be refilled without sacrificing fluid ejection speeds while reducing nozzle to nozzle cross talk. However, alternative embodiments of ejection mechanism 22 can include more or less delivery channels 30 feeding ejection chamber 68 depending on the application specifically contemplated for ejection mechanism 22.
Additionally, positioning delivery channels 30 on opposing sides of ejection chamber 68 facilitates implementation of heater 24 having individually actuateable sections 24a and 24a′ as the drop forming mechanism. Heater section 24a is positioned to seal off one delivery channel 30 when section 24a is activated while heater section 24a′ is positioned to seal off the other delivery channel 30 when section 24a′ is activated.
Experimental Results
An ejection mechanism 22 was fabricated using known CMOS and/or MEMS fabrication techniques. Ejection mechanism 22 included a nozzle bore 56 (having a diameter of approximately 10 microns) and a heater 24 (or 74) (having a width of approximately 2 microns) positioned approximately 0.6 microns from nozzle bore 56. Heater 24 (or 74) was positioned on wall (or “orifice membrane”) 52 (having a thickness of approximately 1.5 microns). Obstruction 48 in conjunction with walls 52 formed ejection chamber 68. (Ejection chamber 68 had a height of approximately 4 microns, the distance between wall 52 and obstruction 48, and a width of approximately 30 microns, the distance between delivery channels or the width of obstruction 48). Ejection chamber 68 was in fluid communication with two delivery channels 30 (each delivery channel having dimensions of approximately 30 microns×120 microns).
Experimental ejection mechanism 22 was operated in the manner described above. Heater 24 (or 74, a 234 ohm heater) was supplied through a cable with a 6 volt electrical pulse having a duration of approximately 2.8 microseconds causing a drop of approximately 1 pico-liter to be ejected through nozzle bore 56. The energy required to accomplish this was approximately 0.4 micro-joules. Subsequent math modeling, a common form of experimentation in the CMOS and/or MEMS industry, has shown that this energy requirement can be substantially reduced to approximately 0.2 micro-joules or less.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/273,916, filed Oct. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,761,437 B2, and assigned to the Eastman Kodak Company which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/470,638, filed Dec. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,510, and assigned to the Eastman Kodak Company.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1941001 | Hansell | Dec 1933 | A |
3373437 | Sweet et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3416153 | Hertz et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3878519 | Eaton | Apr 1975 | A |
3893623 | Toupin | Jul 1975 | A |
4346387 | Hertz | Aug 1982 | A |
4490728 | Vaught et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4580149 | Domoto et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4847630 | Bhaskar et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4982199 | Dunn | Jan 1991 | A |
5016024 | Lam et al. | May 1991 | A |
5109234 | Otis, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5502471 | Obermeier et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5734395 | Kamisuki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746373 | Sanada | May 1998 | A |
5760804 | Heinzl et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5841452 | Silverbrook | Nov 1998 | A |
5886716 | Heinzl et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5966154 | DeBoer | Oct 1999 | A |
6019457 | Silverbrook | Feb 2000 | A |
6022099 | Chwalek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023091 | Koch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045214 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6079821 | Chwalek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102530 | Kim et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6193344 | Otsuka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6273553 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296350 | Cornell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331039 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6382782 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412928 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422677 | Deshpande et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439691 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439703 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460961 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471338 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6497510 | Delametter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6554410 | Jeanmaire et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561625 | Maeng et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561626 | Min et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6588888 | Jeanmaire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6761437 | Delametter et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
20020113843 | Anagnostopoulos et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 354 982 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0 474 472 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 805 036 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 308 272 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 911 167 | Apr 1999 | EP |
6-183029 | Jul 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040179069 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10273916 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10706199 | US | |
Parent | 09470638 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 10273916 | US |