This application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/MY2020/050194 filed on Dec. 4, 2020, which claims the benefit of priority from Malaysian Patent Application No. PI 2019007271, filed Dec. 6, 2019. The entire disclosures of both of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a system for recovering natural gas liquids from hydrocarbon gas streams.
Oil production facilities typically lack the infrastructure to deal with hydrocarbon gases, particularly when they are produced at low pressure due to the costs associated with the additional compression facilities for monetizing the gas. Therefore the gas often vented, flared or re-injected back into the well. However, they can be a source of valuable C4+ components which can be recovered as condensates using a liquid recovery system.
In a known liquid recovery system (LRS) a well stream may be routed to a heat exchanger where the fluid is cooled with minimal change of pressure, and then a separator where liquid (C5+) is collected and the gas (C4−) is routed to a turbo-expander which reduces the pressure to cool the gas. The resultant cooled fluid is directed to a low temperature separator where liquid (C5+) is collected, and the cool gas (C4−) is directed to back to the heat exchanger where it can provide the aforementioned cooling effect on the wellstream fluid. The remaining gas can be flared off or reinjected.
However, if the turbo expander stops working, it is possible to provide a Joule-Thompson valve for bypassing the turbo-expander, which reduces the pressure to cool the gas, but not by as much as the turbo-expander. Therefore the system is less effective at recovering condensate in such circumstances.
An aim of the invention therefore is to provide a liquid recovery system which overcomes the above problem.
In an aspect of the invention, there is provided a system for recovering natural gas liquid from a source, comprising:
Advantageously natural gas liquid condensate can be recovered from the wellstream fluid using the turbo-expander to provide a cooling effect, but if the turbo-expander stops working the system can still operate due to the provision of the Joule-Thomson valve which also reduces the pressure of the gas and as a result reduces the temperature thereof.
However in such circumstances the gas from the second separator may not be sufficiently cold enough to effectively cool the fluid flowing between the first inlet and first outlet of the heat exchanger, so alternative cooling means therefor are required.
In one embodiment if the turbo-expander is not operating, the gas from the second separator is directed away from the heat exchanger, and a refrigerant is directed from the second inlet to the second outlet. Advantageously this hybrid refrigeration system, where the cooling effect is partly provided by the JT valve and partly by the refrigerant, is relatively compact compared to a normal onshore refrigeration system, and can thus be used in offshore applications. However a possible issue with this embodiment is that the refrigerant is directed through the same pipes that were used for the gas from the second separator, and therefore there is a potential risk of contamination of the C3− refrigerant by the C4− fluid.
In one embodiment if the turbo-expander is not operating, the fluid from the first outlet of the heat exchanger is directed to a second heat exchanger prior to being directed to the first separator, refrigerant flowing through the second heat exchanger for cooling the fluid from the first heat exchanger. Again this hybrid refrigeration system, where the cooling effect is partly provided by the JT valve and partly by the refrigerant, is relatively compact compared to a normal onshore refrigeration system, and can thus be used in offshore applications. Advantageously the provision of a second heat exchanger allows the refrigerant to flow through separate pipes to the wellstream fluid to avoid the potential contamination of the refrigerant by fluid when shared pipes are used.
In a further embodiment the liquid from the first and/or second separator is used instead of refrigerant in the second heat exchanger. As liquid has a higher heat capacity than gas, this may increase condensate recovery by 50%.
Thus the alternative cooling means comprises:
In one embodiment the liquid from the first and/or second separator is directed to a stabiliser column with a side outlet for drawing out liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The side draw tray location is based on the LPG specification required. Typically the higher the side draw tray location the higher C3 content of the LPG.
In one embodiment the side outlet is slidably mounted. In an alternative embodiment the side outlet comprises a plurality of trays.
In one embodiment the system changes from the second configuration to a third, fourth or fifth configuration when the temperature of the gas from the first separator is not substantially reduced by the turbo-expander or when a threshold temperature is exceeded. Typically the threshold temperature is selected in the range of −25° C. to 10° C., typically 5° C.
In one embodiment the gas from the second outlet of the heat exchanger is directed to one or more additional separators, collected, or flared off.
In one embodiment a dehydration unit is provided upstream of the heat exchanger. Typically the dehydration unit comprises a molecular sieve, hydrate inhibitor, Monoethylene Glycol (MEG), and/or the like.
It will be convenient to further describe the present invention with respect to the accompanying drawings that illustrate possible arrangements of the invention. Other arrangements of the invention are possible, and consequently the particularity of the accompanying drawings is not to be understood as superseding the generality of the preceding description of the invention.
For the purposes of describing the invention it should be appreciated that the Figures include a plurality of valves (represented as double triangles) to control the configuration of the system, wherein a shaded valve indicates it is closed, whereas a clear valve indicates it is open.
With reference to
Therefore as the gas from the second separator 28 is not cold enough to exert the required cooling effect in the heat exchanger 12, it is diverted through bypass 34, and a refrigerant 36 at the required temperature of −22-−25° C. is directed through the heat exchanger 12 via inlet 30 instead. This is referred to as the third configuration.
However, a possible issue with the third configuration is that the refrigerant is directed through the same inlet 30 and pipes of the heat exchanger 12 that were used for the gas from the second separator, and therefore there is a potential risk of contamination of the C3− refrigerant by the C4− fluid.
As such, with reference to
With reference to
With regard to
Typically the side outlets for drawing out LPG are in the form of a plurality of trays. The number of trays in the column depends on the feed composition to the distillation column, and there may for example be 45 trays. The location of the LPG side draw is dependent on the LPG specification required, which is closely related to the heating value of the LPG−C4 has a higher heating value compared to C3.
The higher the tray location of the side draw the higher C3 content in the liquid LPG. For example, at tray number 3 the content at 54° C. and 13 barg would be 40% (mol) C3 (Propane) and 60% (mol) the rest mainly C4+. At tray 4 the LPG content at 65° C. and 13 barg would be 30% (mol) C3 (Propane) and 70% (mol) the rest mainly C4+. At tray 5 the LPG content at 74.3° C. and 13 barg would be approximately 20% (mol) C3 (Propane) and 80% (mol) the rest mainly C4+.
Gas from the second outlet 31 of the heat exchanger 12 can be directed to one or more additional separators 60, collected 62, reinjected, or flared off.
It should be appreciated that the components for the third-fifth configurations can be selected as alternatives or in any combination depending on the application requirements.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention may also include further additional modifications made to the system which does not affect the overall functioning of the system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PI 2019007271 | Dec 2019 | MY | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/MY2020/050194 | 12/4/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/112664 | 6/10/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6931889 | Foglietta | Aug 2005 | B1 |
9335092 | Madison | May 2016 | B2 |
10139157 | Currence | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20190225891 | Suppiah | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2014-169384 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA issued in PCT/MY2020/050194, mailed Apr. 8, 2021; ISA/KR. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230012234 A1 | Jan 2023 | US |