The present invention relates to heat engines and more particularly to Liquid Ring Rotating Casing Compressor (LRRCC) heat engines.
In a liquid ring expander, an impeller with blades mounted on it is mounted eccentrically in an expander body. A service liquid is present in the expander body and is flung against the wall of the expander body as a result of the centrifugal forces generated by rotation of the impeller. The volume of the service liquid is less than the volume of the expander body. In this way, the service liquid in the expander body forms a circumferential liquid ring which forms chambers bounded in each case by two blades and the liquid ring. Owing to the eccentric positioning of the impeller in the expander body, the size of the chambers increases in the direction of rotation of the impeller, thus allowing gas introduced at high pressure into the narrow chambers of the expander to expand and thereby rotate the impeller.
A liquid ring compressor operates in an analogous manner, only in this case gas is introduced into the widest chamber of the expander such that the size of the chambers decreases in the direction of rotation of the impeller. Owing to the rotation of the impeller and the reduction in the size of the chambers, the gas which has been drawn in is compressed and ejected from the liquid ring expander on the high pressure side.
US 2008/0314041 (corresponding to IL 163263) in the name of the present inventor discloses a heat engine that includes at least one Liquid Ring Rotating Casing Compressor (LRRCC) having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet, a combustion chamber in fluid communication with the output of the LRRCC, and at least one expander having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet. The fluid inlet communicates with the combustion chamber. Efficient LRRCC compressors/turbines are also known from EP 804 687.
The contents of both US 2008/0314041 and EP 804 687 are incorporated herein by reference.
In the heat engine described in US 2008/0314041, an LRRCC is used in tandem with an expander, which may be a conventional turbine or a liquid ring expander of the kind described above. In the case where the turbine is a liquid ring expander having arotating casing, air at high pressure and high temperature is injected into the casing so as to rotate the impeller.
Liquid ring turbines are only feasible if the casing rotates together with the impeller since the friction between the impeller and a fixed casing is prohibitive to obtaining reasonable efficiency. Rotating casing rotating liquid ring turbines are known in the literature but have so far been only theoretical based on the physical principle that an expander is complementary to a compressor. While this is, of course, true in principle, practical rotating casing liquid ring turbines do not appear to have been realized and most turbines currently in use employ very high pressure steam to rotate the turbine at high speeds. As is well-known, several turbines are often employed in cascade, the steam emitted from one turbine being use to rotate the next turbine and so on, until the pressure of the steam is too low to be of effective use. The steam is then cooled using cold water which may come from a river, the sea or a cooling tower.
The use of steam in a rotating casing rotating liquid ring turbine has been proposed by U.S. Pat. No. 4,112,688 (Shaw), which describes a rotating liquid ring turbine driven by an expanding gas and having a rotating casing. Shaw requires that no change of phase occurs in the energy transfer medium as, for example, occurs in the case of the Rankine turbine cycle in which water is converted to steam and back again with unavoidable energy losses, and reduced operating efficiency.
However, in order to meet this requirement, energy must be constantly supplied during the expansion phase to maintain the working medium as steam and thus prevent it from condensing. This is achieved by the provision of heat exchangers in the impeller.
As described, for example, in Wikipedia®, use of the Rankine cycle is well established in steam turbines where a pump is used to pressurize working fluid received from a condenser as a liquid instead of as a gas. All of the energy in pumping the working fluid through the complete cycle is lost, as is all of the energy of vaporization of the working fluid, in the boiler. This energy is lost to the cycle in that first, no condensation takes place in the turbine; all of the vaporization energy being rejected from the cycle through the condenser. But pumping the working fluid through the cycle as a liquid requires a very small fraction of the energy needed to transport it as compared to compressing the working fluid as a gas in a compressor (as in the Carnot cycle).
The working fluid in a Rankine cycle follows a closed loop and is reused constantly. The water vapor with entrained droplets often seen billowing from power stations is generated by the cooling systems (not from the closed-loop Rankine power cycle) and represents the waste energy heat (pumping and vaporization) that could not be converted to useful work in the turbine.
One of the principal advantages the Rankine cycle holds over others is that during the compression stage relatively little work is required to drive the pump, the working fluid being in its liquid phase at this point. By condensing the fluid, the work required by the pump consumes only 1% to 3% of the turbine power and contributes to a much higher efficiency for a real cycle. The benefit of this is lost somewhat due to the lower heat addition temperature as compared with gas turbines, for instance, which have turbine entry temperatures approaching 1500° C.
Process 1-2: The working fluid is pumped from low to high pressure; as the fluid is a liquid at this stage the pump requires little input energy.
Process 2-3: The high pressure liquid enters a boiler where it is heated at constant pressure by an external heat source to become a dry saturated vapor.
Process 3-4: The dry saturated vapor expands through a turbine, generating power. This decreases the temperature and pressure of the vapor, and some condensation may occur.
Process 4-1: The wet vapor then enters a condenser external to the turbine where it is condensed at a constant pressure to become a saturated liquid.
In an ideal Rankine cycle the pump and turbine would be isentropic, i.e., the pump and turbine would generate no entropy and hence maximize the net work output. Processes 1-2 and 3-4 would be represented by vertical lines on the T-S diagram and more closely resemble that of the Carnot cycle. The Rankine cycle shown in
Point 3 lies on the envelope of the T-S curve that delineates between vapor and gas. Thus, if the working fluid is water, to the right of point 3, the working fluid is pure steam while to the left, i.e. within the envelope of the T-S curve it is wet steam and to the left of point 1, it is water. In practice, it is considered undesirable in a practical turbine to reduce the temperature of the working fluid from 3 to 4 since the steam is wet and when water droplets impinge at high pressure on the turbine blades they are liable to cause damage such as pitting and erosion of the blades. This derogates from the performance of the turbine and in time causes irreversible damage, rendering the blades unusable. This problem has been solved using special materials that are resistant to erosion, but these are very expensive.
To avoid pitting caused by wet steam while using conventional materials, it is common to employ superheating of the steam at point 3, so as to raise the temperature to close to 1,000° C. before being directed on to the turbine blades. Superheating, shown by the chain-dotted line, dries the steam thus avoiding the problem of pitting of the turbine blades. Typically, the steam is allowed to condense to a point denoted by 5 on the T-S curve, where its temperature is much reduced and is then re-heated and directed again on to the turbine blades as dry steam where it loses heat and strikes the T-S curve at point 6 where its entropy (S) is significantly higher than that for the conventional Rankine cycle without superheating.
In summary, the Rankine cycle requires either that special materials are used for the turbine blades in which case isentropic heat-energy conversion is possible but at the cost of highly expensive turbine blades; or superheating is required so as to ensure that during the heat-energy conversion stage the steam is maintained dry. This reduces the overall efficiency of the engine.
The present invention seeks to offer the benefits of a near-Rankine cycle which is essentially isentropic without requiring the steam to be dry during the heat-energy conversion stage.
One object of the invention is to employ steam in a rotating casing rotating 30 liquid ring turbine while avoiding condensation of the steam at least until it has done sufficient work, thereby rendering it effective as a propellant.
It is another object to provide a gas turbine that uses a partial Rankine cycle, which is essentially isentropic but does not require the steam to be dry during the heat-energy conversion stage.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a rotating liquid ring rotating casing gas turbine, comprising:
at least one liquid ring rotating casing having an eccentrically mounted impeller adapted to rotate within a surrounding liquid ring so as to form chambers of successively increasing volume between adjacent vanes of the impeller,
a fluid inlet within a static axial bore of the impeller for injecting a fluid as a gas at high pressure into the impeller where the chambers are narrow so as to rotate the impeller and in so doing to expand essentially isentropically, and
a fluid outlet within the static axial bore of the impeller and fluidly separated from the fluid inlet for allowing the fluid to escape at low pressure and low temperature.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a heat engine that includes such a turbine.
A major benefit of such an approach is that no compressor is required, thus saving energy and increasing the thermodynamic efficiency. This in turn means that a heat engine employing the rotating liquid ring rotating casing gas turbine is smaller and suitable for relatively low-power applications operating at low temperature and speed. For example, as distinct from conventional turbines that operate in excess of 130° C. and have an efficiency of approximately 12%, the turbine according to the invention can operate at as low as 100° C. and yet has an efficiency of 16%.
Yet a further benefit is that the turbine according to the invention may employ an open water cycle where cold water after condensation does not need to be re-heated to form steam as is commonly done in steam turbines. Thus, while the invention could also employ a closed cycle if desired, better thermodynamic performance is achieved by using a constant source of geothermically heated water, where the wet steam leaving the turbine is condensed and returned to the atmosphere.
In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description of some embodiments, identical components that appear in more than one figure or that share similar functionality will be referenced by identical reference symbols.
Referring to
A fluid inlet 19 is provided near where the impeller blades are closest to the internal wall of the casing where the chambers are narrow so as to be wholly immersed in the rotating liquid ring, while at the opposite end (shown toward the bottom of
At the compression zone on the right side of
In a LRRC compressor such as described in US 2009/0290993, gas enters the impeller from the central duct at the lower end in proximity to the compression zone.
In contrast thereto, in the LRRC turbine 10 shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the liquid ring is formed of a type of oil that is denser than water and immiscible therewith, and may be maintained at a higher temperature than the steam in order to avoid steam condensation on the liquid ring. Since the working fluid is completely immiscible with the oil in the liquid ring, only working fluid (e.g. condensed steam) exits from the fluid outlet 20 into the central static duct 21 in
In this embodiment, there are three inputs to the turbine since an additional inlet is required for the cold water spray and, as noted, there is thus no need for an external condenser. There is likewise no need for an oil heater, which will in any case be heated by the steam. To the extent that the liquid in the liquid ring is cooler than the incoming working fluid, the working fluid may condense on the liquid ring. This is obviously not desirable since the working fluid in its gaseous state is what drives the impeller. On the other hand, it will be understood that as a result of condensation of the working fluid, the liquid in the liquid ring becomes heated and an equilibrium state is created that impedes further condensation. For this reason, it is believed that water may also be used as the liquid ring.
While in the embodiment described above, a heated oil ring is proposed in order to avoid condensation of the steam, this may give rise to undesirable mixing forming an oil-water emulsion which may be undesirable.
Furthermore, reverting to
For these reasons it is more effective to use a desiccant liquid ring such as brine, which avoids both of these drawbacks. As before, steam enters the fluid inlet 19 and, upon encountering the liquid desiccant ring in the expanding zone, the steam condenses on the liquid interface. The diffusion of water inside the liquid brine is extremely small (approximately 10−9 m2/s) and the water depth at the brine steam interface will be only several microns. Within a short time interval of only several milliseconds the liquid ring interface will face low pressure steam (at the lower end of
The invention also contemplates a method for generating shaft work using the turbine as described.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
204389 | Mar 2010 | IL | national |
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/583,527, filed Sep. 7, 2012, now allowed, which is a U.S. National Phase Application of International Application No. PCT/IL2011/000223, filed Mar. 9, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority to Israeli Application No. 204389, filed Mar. 9, 2010, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1463646 | Constantin | Jul 1923 | A |
2815003 | Kumm | Dec 1957 | A |
2937499 | Hermann | May 1960 | A |
3423078 | May | Jan 1969 | A |
4112688 | Shaw | Sep 1978 | A |
4152898 | Awerbuch | May 1979 | A |
4428200 | McCabe | Jan 1984 | A |
5636523 | Assaf | Jun 1997 | A |
5722255 | Brasz | Mar 1998 | A |
7066718 | Haga | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20080314041 | Assaf | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090290993 | Assaf | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20140147244 | Cantemir | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3718551 | Dec 1988 | DE |
102006049944 | Mar 2008 | DE |
2270119 | Mar 1994 | GB |
WO 9622467 | Jul 1996 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2012, from Israel Patent Office in the corresponding application in Israel, citing U.S. Pat. No. 7,066,718 as rendering the claims allegedly obvious. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170037727 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13583527 | US | |
Child | 15245287 | US |