A liquid to air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) transfers heat and moisture between a liquid desiccant and an air stream in order to condition the temperature and humidity of the air flowing through the LAMEE. LAMEEs can be employed in a number of different applications, including, for example, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems, dehumidification systems, evaporative cooling, industrial applications requiring treated air, etc. In another application, the exchanger transfers heat and moisture between the desiccant and air in order to condition the temperature and concentration of the desiccant by both releasing or gaining heat and releasing or gaining moisture in the desiccant in any combination.
Existing LAMEEs use micro-porous hydrophobic membranes to contain a liquid desiccant, including, for example, a halide salt. In these membranes a micro-porous structure is created in a thin film of a low surface energy polymer such as PTFE, polypropylene or polyethylene. The hydrophobic membrane resists penetration by the liquid due to surface tension, while freely allowing the transfer of gases, including water vapor, through the membrane pores. In the LAMEE application, the membranes are typically about 20 microns thick with a mean pore size of 0.1-0.2 micron. Micro-porous membranes however, are subject to two potential problems which can directly affect their function. Firstly, the membrane pores could become blocked by mineral deposition, dust accumulation, etc., which would degrade the moisture vapor transfer rate of the membrane and require cleaning to restore performance. Secondly, the membrane pores could become contaminated by a surfactant, oil, or other compound, which lowers the surface tension of the desiccant and allows penetration of the liquid through the pores. The susceptibility of micro-porous membranes to surfactants may require prevention or inhibition of environmental exposure to these compounds.
Liquid desiccants used in HVAC and drying applications are typically solutions of halide salts (such as lithium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, or lithium bromide) and water. These solutions have two important properties: they are strongly hygroscopic and the salt is non-volatile. The hygroscopic property allows the solution to either release or absorb water vapor from an air stream depending on the water vapor pressure of the solution compared to that of the air. High concentration salt solutions (for example a 40% LiCl solution) can have very low vapor pressures, which produces a large potential for dehumidification of the air stream encountering the solution. Traditionally, liquid desiccant systems designed for industrial and commercial drying applications have used direct contact exchangers, in which a media wetted with desiccant (such as a cellulose honeycomb matrix) is exposed directly to an air stream. These exchangers require a salt that is non-volatile under the temperatures and pressures used for air treatment so that the salt does not evaporate into the air. The salt charge remains in the system and does not have to be replenished over time. Membrane exchangers with micro-porous membranes have the same requirement, since a gas phase can freely move through the membrane.
The main disadvantage of salt-based desiccants is that they are very corrosive to metals. For example, lithium chloride (LiCl) causes rapid corrosion of most ferrous and nonferrous metals with example exceptions including titanium and some copper-nickel alloys. Direct contact exchangers have not been widely used in HVAC applications because of the potential for desiccant droplet carryover into the air stream and corrosion of downstream metal ducting, fans and other air handling equipment. The membrane exchanger provides separation of the desiccant from the air, preventing droplet carryover; however, in the event of a membrane failure or liquid circuit leak, some local corrosion may occur if the desiccant is not detected and cleaned up. The corrosive desiccant also contributes to an increased cost for the exchanger and liquid pumping circuit because corrosion resistant materials may need to be used in portions of the circuit that may encounter the desiccant. Corrosion resistant sensors, pumps, heat exchangers, etc. may all contribute to increased cost for the circuit vs. components mass produced from non-corrosion resistant metals. In addition, secure containment of the desiccant is required in the event of a circuit leak or spill to prevent migration of corrosive desiccant into the air handling unit cabinet, mechanical room or building structure. This can further add to system cost and complexity. The lithium salts can also be relatively expensive, and costs may continue to rise due to pressure on the global lithium supply from lithium-ion battery production.
Glycols are another type of liquid desiccant that have been used in some drying applications. Glycols, however, are volatile and will steadily evaporate into an air stream when used in a direct contact exchanger or a membrane exchanger with micro-porous membranes. The steady consumption of glycol and the impact on air quality has made this desiccant unacceptable for most HVAC and dehumidification applications. Other potential strong hygroscopic fluids that are low cost, non-toxic and non-corrosive also may not be used in existing liquid desiccant systems because of either volatility, reactivity with air or air pollutants or production of odors. Therefore, current liquid desiccant systems are sometimes restricted to using halide salts with their inherent drawbacks.
The present inventors recognize, among other things, an opportunity for an energy exchanger that allows for use of a variety of liquid desiccants in combination with a non-porous, selectively permeable membrane.
The following non-limiting examples pertain generally, but not by way of limitation, to energy exchanger systems and methods for conditioning air in an enclosed space, such as a commercial or residential building. The following non-limiting examples are provided to further illustrate the systems and methods disclosed herein.
Examples according to the present application include LAMEEs including a membrane that is selectively permeable to water, including any of the membranes disclosed herein. Example LAMEEs in accordance with the present application can be employed in a variety of systems/applications, including, for example, residential and commercial HVAC, dehumidification, humidification, desiccant regeneration, evaporative cooling and industrial drying applications.
In one example, a LAMEE includes a selectively permeable membrane separating an air stream from a liquid desiccant. The membrane is selectively permeable to water but not to other species/constituents present in the liquid desiccant or air. In one example, the membrane is a non-porous membrane. Example membranes may allow the use of hygroscopic fluids, which may be volatile, reactive and otherwise unsuitable for use in existing micro-porous membrane or direct contact liquid desiccant exchangers. In one example, the selectively permeable membrane includes an ion exchange membrane. In another example, the selectively permeable membrane includes a pervaporation membrane.
Examples according to the present application may address at least some of the drawbacks with current LAMEE technology using halide salt solutions by including an improved combination of fluid desiccant and membrane. For example, the liquid desiccant may be selected to be strongly hygroscopic, non-corrosive, non-toxic, and low cost; the membrane may have high water transport rates, be non-permeable to other species in the chosen desiccant, low cost, and have good mechanical properties and thermal/chemical stability. LAMEE systems in accordance with the present application may have an operating performance comparable with current LAMEEs, but with potentially significantly reduced costs and risk compared to current systems using salt-based desiccants. LAMEE systems in accordance with the present application may have a broader market acceptance in the HVAC industry and lead to wider adoption of energy efficient liquid desiccant conditioning equipment. In addition, selectively permeable membranes included in examples of the present application may have a reduced risk to membrane fouling, surfactant contamination, and biological growth.
Selectively permeable membranes employed in examples of the present application may also allow the use of salt solutions that have a higher potential to precipitate out. In some cases, for example in LAMEEs including a micro-porous membrane, this could occur near the membrane surface leading to fouling, but, due to the nature of selectively permeable membranes in accordance with examples of the present application, the precipitate is not likely to foul the membrane. Instead the precipitate could flow through the LAMEE and be collected and purged from the system with a mechanical filter, leaving the membrane intact and functioning to specifications. Such membranes may also be well suited for the utilization of acetate salts, widely avoided due to the evaporation of acetic acid leading to a pungent vinegar smell in the space. The acetic acid vapors would be contained by the selectively permeable membrane.
This overview is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the invention. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
A liquid to air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) can be used as part of a heating and cooling system (or energy exchange system) to transfer heat and moisture between a liquid desiccant and an air stream to condition the temperature and humidity of the air flowing through the LAMEE. The membrane can be a non-porous film having selective permeability for water, but not for other constituents that form the liquid desiccant. Many different types of liquid desiccants can be used in combination with the non-porous membrane, including, for example, glycols. The non-porous membrane can make it feasible to use desiccants, such as glycols, that had been previously determined to be unacceptable or undesirable in these types of applications. For example, ion-exchange membranes can be designed to be selectively permeable to ionic species (anions or cations) and water. Applications of ion-exchange membranes include fuel cells, desalination, water treatment, water purification, brine concentration, moisture exchange (including energy recovery exchangers), among others. These types of membranes can be constructed from polymers, inorganic materials and organic-inorganic hybrids, and can have a range of desirable attributes including very high flux rates of the permeable species, good mechanical properties and strength retention when exposed to water, and resistance to heat and chemical degradation. These membranes may also have inherent anti-fouling and anti-bacterial properties.
Example membranes are described below which are suitable with energy exchange systems described herein. Similarly, various types of liquid desiccants are described below as examples for use with the non-porous, selectively permeable membrane. It is recognized that any type of liquid desiccant that facilitates absorption of moisture from the air (or vice versa—release of moisture to the air) and is usable with a non-porous membrane can be included for use with the LAMEEs described herein.
As shown in
Return air 116 is channeled out of the enclosed structure 101. A mass flow rate portion 118 of the return air 116 may be returned to the HVAC system 112. Another mass flow rate portion 119 of the return air 116 may be channeled to a return air or regeneration LAMEE 120. The portions 118 and 119 may be separated with a damper 121 or the like. For example, 80% of the return air 116 may be channeled to the HVAC system 112 and 20% of the return air 116 may be channeled to the return air LAMEE 120. The return air LAMEE 120 exchanges energy between the portion 119 of the return air 116 and the preconditioned air 110 in the supply air LAMEE 108. During a winter mode, the return air LAMEE 120 collects heat and moisture from the portion 119 of the return air 116. During a summer mode, the return air LAMEE 120 discharges heat and moisture into the portion 119 of the return air 116. The return air LAMEE 120 generates exhaust air 122. The exhaust air 122 is discharged from the structure 101 through an outlet 124. A fan 126 may be provided to move the exhaust air 122 from the return air LAMEE 120. The system 100 may include multiple fans 126 or one or more fan arrays located either up-stream or down-stream (as in
A liquid, such as a desiccant fluid 127, flows between the supply air LAMEE 108 and the return air LAMEE 120. The desiccant fluid 127 transfers the heat and moisture between the supply air LAMEE 108 and the return air LAMEE 120. The system 100 may include desiccant storage tanks 128 in fluid communication between the supply air LAMEE 108 and the return air LAMEE 120. The storage tanks 128 store the desiccant fluid 127 as it is channeled between the supply air LAMEE 108 and the return air LAMEE 120. Optionally, the system 100 may not include both storage tanks 128 or may have more than two storage tanks. Pumps 130 are provided to move the desiccant fluid 127 from the storage tanks 128 to one of the supply air LAMEE 108 or the return air LAMEE 120. The illustrated embodiment includes two pumps 130. Optionally, the system 100 may be configured with as few as one pump 130 or more than two pumps 130. The desiccant fluid 127 flows between the supply air LAMEE 108 and the return air LAMEE 120 to transfer heat and moisture between the conditioned air 110 and the portion 118 of the return air 116.
The energy exchange system 100 of
An energy exchange cavity 330 extends through the housing 302 of the LAMEE 300. The energy exchange cavity 330 extends from the air inlet end 306 to the air outlet end 308. An air stream 332 is received in the air inlet 322 and flows through the energy exchange cavity 330. The air stream 332 is discharged from the energy exchange cavity 330 at the air outlet 324. The energy exchange cavity 330 may include a plurality of panels 334, such as liquid panels configured to receive desiccant and direct the flow of the desiccant therethrough.
A desiccant inlet reservoir 352 may be positioned on the top 310. The desiccant inlet reservoir 352 may be configured to receive desiccant, which may be stored in a storage tank 128 (shown in
Air from an enclosed space like a commercial or residential building enters the LAMEE 300 through the air inlet end 306. The air 332 entering the LAMEE 300 has a first temperature and a first humidity. The air 332 flows through one or more air flow channels in the LAMEE 300, which are separated from the liquid desiccant flowing through the LAMEE 300 by selectively permeable membrane(s). As the inlet air 332 flows through the LAMEE 300, the liquid desiccant acts to condition the air by altering the temperature and humidity of the air. For example, the liquid desiccant can have a lower temperature than the inlet air and can act to remove heat from the inlet air such that the conditioned air exiting the LAMEE 300 is at a lower temperature compared to the air entering the LAMEE 300.
Additionally, the hygroscopic property of the desiccant can allow the desiccant to either release or absorb water vapor from the inlet air depending, for example, on the water vapor pressure of the desiccant compared to that of the inlet air. For example, liquid desiccants with relatively low vapor pressures can provide a large potential for dehumidification of the inlet air flowing through the LAMEE 300. The conditioned air flowing out of the LAMEE 300 after being conditioned by the liquid desiccant separated from the air by the selectively permeable membrane has a second temperature and second humidity, which is different than the first temperature and first humidity of the inlet air.
It is noted that for purposes of the present application, semi-permeable and selectively permeable have the same meaning.
In order to minimize or otherwise eliminate the liquid desiccant channels 376 from outwardly bulging or bowing, membrane support assemblies may be positioned within the air channels 336. The membrane support assemblies are configured to support the membranes, and may promote turbulent air flow between the air channels 336 and the membranes 378.
As an example, the LAMEE 300 may be similar to a LAMEE as described in WO 2011/161547, entitled “Liquid-To-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger,” filed Jun. 22, 2011.
Each liquid panel assembly 402 may include a support frame 412 connected to an inlet member 414 at an upper corner 415 and an outlet member 416 at a lower corner 417 that may be diagonal to the upper corner 415. Further, membranes 418 are positioned on each side of the support frame 412. The membranes 418 sealingly engage the support frame 412 along outer edges in order to contain liquid within the liquid panel assembly 402. Alternatively, a single membrane may sealingly wrap around an entirety of the support frame 412.
Each inlet member 414 may include a liquid delivery opening 420, while each outlet member 416 may include a liquid passage opening 422. The liquid delivery openings 420 may be connected together through conduits, pipes, or the like, while the liquid passage openings 422 may be connected together through conduits, pipes, or the like. Optionally, the inlet members 414 and outlet members 416 may be sized and shaped to directly mate with one another so that a liquid-tight seal is formed therebetween. Accordingly, liquid, such as desiccant may flow through the liquid delivery openings 420 and the liquid passage openings 422. The inlet members 414 and outlet members 416 may be modular components configured to selectively couple and decouple from other inlet members 414 and outlet members 416, respectively. For example, the inlet members 414 and outlet members 416 may be configured to securely mate with other inlet members 414 and outlet members 416, respectively, through snap and/or latching connections, or through fasteners and adhesives.
As shown, the liquid panel assemblies 402, the membrane support assemblies 404, and the air channels 406 may all be vertically oriented. The liquid panel assemblies 402 may be flat plate exchangers that are vertically-oriented with respect to a base that is supported by a floor, for example, of a structure.
Alternatively, the liquid panel assemblies 402, the membrane support assemblies 404, and the air channels 406 may all be horizontally oriented. For example, the liquid panel assemblies 402 may be flat plate exchangers that are horizontally-oriented with respect to a base that is supported by a floor, for example, of a structure.
In operation, liquid, such as desiccant, flows into the liquid delivery openings 420 of the inlet members 414. For example, the liquid may be pumped into the liquid delivery openings 420 through a pump. The liquid then flows into the support frames 412 through a liquid path 424 toward the outlet members 416. As shown, the liquid path 424 includes a vertical descent 426 that connects to a horizontal, flow portion, such as a flow portion 428, which, in turn, connects to a vertical descent 430 that connects to the liquid passage opening 422 of the outlet member 416. The vertical descents 426 and 430 may be perpendicular to the horizontal, flow portion 428. As such, the liquid flows through the solution panel assemblies 402 from the top corners 415 to the lower corners 417. As shown, the length of the horizontal, flow portion 428 substantially exceeds half the length L of the liquid panel assemblies 402. The horizontal, flow portion 428 provides liquid, such as desiccant, that may counterflow with respect to the airflow 408. Alternatively, the flow portion may be a crossflow, parallel-aligned flow, or other such flow portion, for example.
The airflow 408 that passes between the liquid panel assemblies 402 exchanges energy with the liquid flowing through the liquid panel assemblies 402. The liquid may be a desiccant, refrigerant, or any other type of liquid that may be used to exchange energy with the airflow 408.
The energy exchange cavity 400 may include more or less liquid panel assemblies 402, membrane support assemblies 404, and air channels 406 than those shown in
Additional details about the liquid panel assemblies 402 are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/797,152, entitled “Liquid Panel Assembly”, filed Mar. 12, 2013, and published as US Pub. No. US 2014/0054013.
The membrane 508 is non-porous and selectively permeable to water 504, but not permeable to the one or more non-water constituents 506 present in the liquid desiccant or air. In an example, the membrane 508 can be a non-porous film. The membrane 508 does not allow a general transfer of other species/constituent compounds present in the liquid desiccant or air, including the one or more non-water constituents 506, through the membrane 508. In some examples, the membrane 508 may allow a very low flux of the one or more non-water constituents 506 in the desiccant if the flux rate is considered acceptable for a given application. As such, the one or more non-water constituents 506 may not be completely contained by the membranes 508. As shown in
In an example, the membrane 508 is a solution-diffusion membrane which facilitates transport of the water 504 through the membrane 508. The transport can be provided by, for example, ion conduction channels in the membrane 508. Thus transport can be guided by specific structural features in the membrane 508; alternatively, in other examples, transport can occur at any location on the membrane 508.
The water molecules 504 can be transported from the liquid desiccant through the membrane 508 to the air which is flowing in an opposite direction to the flow of the liquid desiccant. Similarly, water from the air can be transported from the air through the membrane 508 to the liquid desiccant, depending on particular conditions of the air. The water molecules 504 may be transported through the membrane 508 as ions (such as, for example, H+ and OH− ions) rather than as H2O molecules. The water molecules 504 may be transported through the membrane 508 in a liquid or vapor phase.
Various types of selectively permeable, non-porous membranes can be used as the membrane 508. In an example, ion-exchange membranes can be designed to be selectively permeable to ionic species and water. Examples of ion-exchange membranes with a selective permeability for water include Nexar® polymers, which are sulfonated block copolymers from Kraton Performance Polymers (reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,224), and Aquivion® PFSA from Solvay Plastics. Membranes formed of these materials can include, for example, Short Side Chain (SSC) copolymer of Tetrafluoroethylene and a Sulfonyl Fluoride Vinyl Ether (SFVE) F2C═CF—OCF2CF2-SO2F of low molecular weight. It is recognized that these polymers can be modified to achieve desired characteristics.
Pervaporation membranes can be used as the membrane 508. Hydrophilic pervaporation membranes have been developed for dehydration of organic solvents such as glycols, alcohols, and other azeotropic or close boiling mixtures. These membranes are selectively permeable to water, and when the liquid solution is exposed to the membrane with a vacuum or low vapor pressure gas on the other side, the water selectively permeates/diffuses through the membrane and then evaporates on the side with the gas phase while the solvent is isolated on the liquid side.
Pervaporation membranes are currently available with high flux rates, high selectivity ratio, and good thermal/chemical stability. Examples include cross-linked chitosan, ceramic, silica-based, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyimide-based membranes.
It is recognized that the non-porous membrane 508 can include at least one porous portion or layer. In an example, a non-porous film can be deposited onto a porous substrate and the porous substrate can act as a supporting layer to the non-porous film. In some examples, a backer layer can also be included with the porous substrate and non-porous film. The backer layer can be thicker than the porous substrate and thicker than the non-porous film, and can be formed, for example, from a spun bond or other fibrous material. The non-porous film can be very thin, relative to the porous layer and the backer layer.
Various types of liquid desiccants can be used within the panel 500 of
In an example, the liquid desiccant can include glycols, or glycol-based solutions, such as triethylene glycol and propylene glycol, which are non-toxic, compatible with most metals and comparatively low in cost. Glycols can be strongly hygroscopic at higher concentrations. For example, a 95% solution of triethylene glycol has a comparable drying/dehumidification potential to lithium chloride near saturation. Triethylene glycol and tripropylene glycol can have low vapor pressures, but can be expensive. Less expensive and higher vapor pressure glycols, such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol and dipropylene glycol, can be used herein.
In an example, the liquid desiccant can include an acetate salt, such as, but not limited to, an aqueous potassium acetate and an aqueous sodium acetate. Other examples of liquid desiccants usable in the system described herein include, but are not limited to, hygroscopic polyol based solutions, sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid. Glycerol is an example of a hygroscopic polyol usable herein.
As described above, salt-based desiccants can have disadvantages when used with energy exchangers similar to those described herein; however, such salt-based desiccants can offer advantages as well, since these types of desiccants are generally not volatile and are resistant to degradation. Examples of salt-based desiccants usable herein include lithium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, potassium fluoride, zinc bromide, zinc iodide, calcium bromide, sodium iodide and sodium bromide.
In summary, any type of liquid desiccant compatible with a non-porous membrane and useful in conditioning air can be used in the panel 500 and LAMEEs described herein. The types of liquid desiccant can include, but are not limited to, an acetate salt solution, a halide salt solution, a hygroscopic polyol based solution, a glycol based solution, a sulfuric acid solution, a phosphoric acid solution, and any combinations thereof. It is recognized that mixtures of desiccants can be used as the liquid desiccant in the panel 500 and LAMEEs described herein.
The panel 600 can include a multi-layer membrane design. In addition to non-porous membranes 608, the panel 600 can also include microporous membranes 609 adjacent to porous membranes 608. The microporous membranes 609 can provide chemical or structural stability. The microporous membranes 609 can be air permeable, whereas the non-porous membranes 608 can be air impermeable. In an example, each microporous membrane 609 can be bonded to the adjacent porous membrane 608, by lamination, deposition or other known bonding techniques. As similarly described above in reference to
As shown, the microporous membranes 609 are in contact with the desiccant and the porous membranes 608 are in contact with the air. In another example, the microporous membranes 609 can be in contact with the air and the non-porous membranes 608 can be in contact with the desiccant. The microporous membranes 609 can each be formed of multiple microporous sublayers with different chemical and/or physical properties, such as corrosion resistance and pore size. Similarly, the non-porous membranes 608 can each be formed of multiple non-porous layers of different compositions and characteristics.
In another example, each side of the panel 600 can include more than two layers with alternating non-porous 608 and microporous 609 membranes.
In an example, the microporous membranes 609 can include polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which is chemically stable and able to resist degradation. As such, it can be beneficial, in an example, to have the microporous membranes 609 in contact with the desiccant. In an example, a microporous membrane 609 including PTFE can be used in combination with a liquid desiccant including a halide salt, and the microporous membranes 609 and the non-porous membranes 608 can be configured as shown in
In an example, the method 700 can optionally include interposing a microporous membrane between the flow of air and the flow of liquid desiccant. The microporous membrane can be adjacent to or bonded to the selectively permeable membrane.
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” Such examples can include elements in addition to those shown or described. However, the present inventors also contemplate examples in which only those elements shown or described are provided. Moreover, the present inventors also contemplate examples using any combination or permutation of those elements shown or described (or one or more aspects thereof), either with respect to a particular example (or one or more aspects thereof), or with respect to other examples (or one or more aspects thereof) shown or described herein.
All publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In this document, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
Method examples described herein can be machine or computer-implemented at least in part. Some examples can include a computer-readable medium or machine-readable medium encoded with instructions operable to configure an electronic device to perform methods as described in the above examples. An implementation of such methods can include code, such as microcode, assembly language code, a higher-level language code, or the like. Such code can include computer readable instructions for performing various methods. The code may form portions of computer program products. Further, the code can be tangibly stored on one or more volatile or non-volatile tangible computer-readable media, such as during execution or at other times. Examples of these tangible computer-readable media can include, but are not limited to, hard disks, removable magnetic disks, removable optical disks (e.g., compact disks and digital video disks), magnetic cassettes, memory cards or sticks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like.
Examples, as described herein, may include, or may operate on, logic or a number of components, modules, or mechanisms. Modules may be hardware, software, or firmware communicatively coupled to one or more processors in order to carry out the operations described herein. Modules may hardware modules, and as such modules may be considered tangible entities capable of performing specified operations and may be configured or arranged in a certain manner. In an example, circuits may be arranged (e.g., internally or with respect to external entities such as other circuits) in a specified manner as a module. In an example, the whole or part of one or more computer systems (e.g., a standalone, client or server computer system) or one or more hardware processors may be configured by firmware or software (e.g., instructions, an application portion, or an application) as a module that operates to perform specified operations. In an example, the software may reside on a machine-readable medium. In an example, the software, when executed by the underlying hardware of the module, causes the hardware to perform the specified operations. Accordingly, the term hardware module is understood to encompass a tangible entity, be that an entity that is physically constructed, specifically configured (e.g., hardwired), or temporarily (e.g., transitorily) configured (e.g., programmed) to operate in a specified manner or to perform part or all of any operation described herein. Considering examples in which modules are temporarily configured, each of the modules need not be instantiated at any one moment in time. For example, where the modules comprise a general-purpose hardware processor configured using software; the general-purpose hardware processor may be configured as respective different modules at different times. Software may accordingly configure a hardware processor, for example, to constitute a particular module at one instance of time and to constitute a different module at a different instance of time. Modules may also be software or firmware modules, which operate to perform the methodologies described herein.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment, and it is contemplated that such embodiments can be combined with each other in various combinations or permutations. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
The present application provides for the following exemplary embodiments or examples, the numbering of which is not to be construed as designating levels of importance:
Example 1 provides a liquid to air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) and can comprise at least one air flow channel comprising a first inlet for receiving a flow of air into the LAMEE and a first outlet for exhausting the flow of air out of the LAMEE, a temperature and a humidity of the air changing between the first inlet and the first outlet. The LAMEE can also comprise at least one liquid desiccant channel comprising a second inlet for receiving a flow of liquid desiccant into the LAMEE and a second outlet for expelling the flow of liquid desiccant from the LAMEE, and a selective permeable, non-porous membrane interposed between the flow of air and the flow of liquid desiccant. The membrane can be selectively permeable to water in the flow of air and the flow of liquid desiccant. Water molecules or ions can be transportable through the membrane to transfer water between the air and the liquid desiccant.
Example 2 provides the LAMEE of Example 1 optionally configured such that the selectively permeable, non-porous membrane comprises at least one of an ion exchange membrane, a pervaporation membrane, and a solution diffusion membrane.
Example 3 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1 or 2 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid desiccant comprises a solution of glycol and water.
Example 4 provides the LAMEE of Example 3 optionally configured such that the glycol is selected from the group consisting of triethylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and combinations thereof.
Example 5 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1-4 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid desiccant comprises an acetate salt.
Example 6 provides the LAMEE of Example 5 optionally configured such that the acetate salt comprises at least one of aqueous potassium acetate and aqueous sodium acetate.
Example 7 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1-6 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid desiccant comprises a solution of one or more halide salts and water.
Example 8 provides the LAMEE of Example 7 optionally configured such that the one or more halide salts are selected from the group consisting of lithium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, lithium bromide, lithium iodide, potassium fluoride, zinc bromide, zinc iodide, calcium bromide, sodium iodide, sodium bromide, and combinations thereof.
Example 9 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1-8 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid desiccant comprises a desiccant selected from the group consisting of a hygroscopic polyol based solution, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, and combinations thereof.
Example 10 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1-9 optionally configured such that the selectively permeable, non-porous membrane is attached to a porous layer.
Example 11 provides the LAMEE of Example 10 optionally configured such that the non-porous membrane is adjacent to the at least one air flow channel and the porous layer is adjacent to the at least one liquid desiccant channel.
Example 12 provides the LAMEE of Example 10 optionally configured such that the non-porous membrane is adjacent to the at least one liquid desiccant channel and the porous layer is adjacent to the at least one air flow channel.
Example 13 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 1-12 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid desiccant is selected from the group consisting of an acetate salt solution, a halide salt solution, a hygroscopic polyol based solution, a glycol based solution, a sulfuric acid solution, a phosphoric acid solution, and any combinations thereof.
Example 14 provides a liquid to air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) and can comprise a plurality of semi-permeable, non-porous membranes arranged in parallel, and a liquid desiccant channel formed by first and second membranes of the plurality of membranes. The first and second membranes can be adjacent to one another and the liquid desiccant channel can be configured to receive a liquid desiccant flowing through the liquid desiccant channel. The LAMEE can further comprise an air channel adjacent to the liquid desiccant channel and formed by the second membrane and a third membrane of the plurality of membranes. The second and third membranes can be adjacent to one another and the air channel can be configured to receive air flowing through the air channel. The liquid desiccant can condition the air flowing through the air channel, and at least one of a temperature and humidity of the air at an inlet of the air channel can be different than a temperature and humidity of the air at an outlet of the air channel. Each of the membranes of the plurality of membranes can be selectively permeable to water in the air and liquid desiccant.
Example 15 provides the LAMEE of Example 14 optionally configured such that each of the membranes of the plurality of membranes is attached to a porous layer.
Example 16 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 14 or 15 optionally configured such that each of the membranes of the plurality of membranes is selected form the group consisting of a solution diffusion membrane, an ion exchange membrane, and a pervaporation membrane.
Example 17 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 14-16 optionally configured such that the liquid desiccant is selected from the group consisting of an acetate salt solution, a halide salt solution, a hygroscopic polyol based solution, a glycol based solution, a sulfuric acid solution, a phosphoric acid solution, and any combinations thereof.
Example 18 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 14-17 optionally further comprising additional liquid desiccant channels and air channels formed by adjacent membranes of the plurality of membranes, wherein the liquid desiccant channels and air channels are arranged in an alternating pattern.
Example 19 provides the LAMEE of any of Examples 14-18 optionally configured such that the air channel is configured to receive air flowing through the air channel in a direction opposite to the liquid desiccant flowing through the liquid desiccant channel.
Example 20 provides a method of conditioning air in an enclosed space and can comprise providing a liquid to air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) comprising a non-porous membrane selectively permeable to water, directing a flow of air through the LAMEE and a directing a flow of liquid desiccant through the LAMEE. The liquid desiccant can condition the air and at least one of a temperature and a humidity of the air at an inlet of the LAMEE is different than a temperature and a humidity of the air at an outlet of the LAMEE. Water in the air and liquid desiccant is transportable through the membrane.
Example 21 provides the method of Example 20 optionally configured such that the flow of liquid through the LAMEE is in an opposite direction to the flow of air through the LAMEE.
Example 22 provides the method of any of Examples 20 or 21 optionally configured such that the liquid desiccant is selected from the group consisting of an acetate salt solution, a halide salt solution, a hygroscopic polyol based solution, a glycol based solution, a sulfuric acid solution, a phosphoric acid solution, and any combinations thereof.
Example 23 provides the method of Example 22 optionally configured such that the liquid desiccant comprises a glycol based solution of water and glycol, and the glycol is selected form the group consisting of triethylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, and combinations thereof.
Example 24 provides the method of any of Examples 20-23 optionally configured such that the non-porous membrane comprises at least one of an ion exchange membrane, a pervaporation membrane, and a solution diffusion membrane.
Example 25 provides a system, LAMEE, or method of any one or any combination of Examples 1-24, which can be optionally configured such that all steps or elements recited are available to use or select from.
Various aspects of the disclosure have been described. These and other aspects are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/039,254, filed on Aug. 19, 2014, the benefit of priority of which is claimed hereby, and which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1015831 | Pielock et al. | Jan 1912 | A |
2186844 | Smith | Jan 1940 | A |
2290465 | Crawford et al. | Jul 1942 | A |
2562811 | Muffly | Jul 1951 | A |
2946201 | Munters | Jul 1960 | A |
2968165 | Norback | Jan 1961 | A |
3009684 | Munters | Nov 1961 | A |
3018231 | Valentine et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3144901 | Meek | Aug 1964 | A |
3247679 | Gershon | Apr 1966 | A |
3291206 | Nicholson | Dec 1966 | A |
3401530 | Gershon | Sep 1968 | A |
3467072 | Toesca | Sep 1969 | A |
3735559 | Salemme | May 1973 | A |
4011731 | Meckler | Mar 1977 | A |
4113004 | Rush et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4180985 | Northrup, Jr. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233796 | Mazzoni et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4235081 | Dowling | Nov 1980 | A |
4257169 | Pierce | Mar 1981 | A |
4259849 | Griffiths | Apr 1981 | A |
4373347 | Howell et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4380910 | Hood et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4430864 | Mathiprakasam | Feb 1984 | A |
4474021 | Harband | Oct 1984 | A |
4538426 | Bock | Sep 1985 | A |
4594860 | Coellner et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4691530 | Meckler | Sep 1987 | A |
4700550 | Rhodes | Oct 1987 | A |
4719761 | Cromer | Jan 1988 | A |
4723417 | Meckler | Feb 1988 | A |
4729428 | Yasutake et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4841733 | Dussault et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4887438 | Meckler | Dec 1989 | A |
4900448 | Bonne et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905479 | Wilkinson | Mar 1990 | A |
4909810 | Nakao et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4930322 | Ashley et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936107 | Kitagaki et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939906 | Spatz et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4941324 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4982575 | Besik | Jan 1991 | A |
5003961 | Besik | Apr 1991 | A |
5020334 | Wilkinson | Jun 1991 | A |
5020335 | Albers et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022241 | Wilkinson | Jun 1991 | A |
5120445 | Colman | Jun 1992 | A |
5131238 | Meckler | Jul 1992 | A |
5148374 | Coellner | Sep 1992 | A |
5170633 | Kaplan | Dec 1992 | A |
5176005 | Kaplan | Jan 1993 | A |
5181387 | Meckler | Jan 1993 | A |
5191771 | Meckler | Mar 1993 | A |
5297398 | Meckler | Mar 1994 | A |
5311929 | Verret | May 1994 | A |
5325676 | Meckler | Jul 1994 | A |
5351497 | Lowenstein | Oct 1994 | A |
5353606 | Yoho et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373704 | Mcfadden | Dec 1994 | A |
5387376 | Gasser | Feb 1995 | A |
5448895 | Coellner et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471852 | Meckler | Dec 1995 | A |
5482625 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496397 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502975 | Brickley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517828 | Calton et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526651 | Worek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542968 | Belding et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551245 | Calton et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564281 | Calton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579647 | Calton et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5580369 | Belding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5632954 | Coellner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638900 | Lowenstein et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649428 | Calton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650221 | Belding et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653115 | Brickley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660048 | Belding et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661983 | Groten et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685897 | Belding et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5701762 | Akamatsu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5718286 | Damsohn et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727394 | Belding et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732562 | Moratalla | Mar 1998 | A |
5749230 | Coellner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758508 | Belding et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5758511 | Yoho et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761915 | Rao | Jun 1998 | A |
5761923 | Maeda | Jun 1998 | A |
5791153 | Belding et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791157 | Maeda | Aug 1998 | A |
5816065 | Maeda | Oct 1998 | A |
5825641 | Mangtani | Oct 1998 | A |
5826434 | Belding et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826641 | Bierwirth et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832736 | Yoshioka et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860284 | Goland et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890372 | Belding et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5911273 | Brenner et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931016 | Yoho | Aug 1999 | A |
5943874 | Maeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5946931 | Lomax et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950447 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5992160 | Bussjager et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003327 | Belding et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018953 | Belding et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6018954 | Assaf | Feb 2000 | A |
6029462 | Denniston | Feb 2000 | A |
6029467 | Moratalla | Feb 2000 | A |
6050100 | Belding et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6079481 | Lowenstein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094835 | Cromer | Aug 2000 | A |
6138470 | Potnis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141979 | Dunlap | Nov 2000 | A |
6145588 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156102 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176101 | Lowenstein | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178762 | Flax | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199388 | Fischer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237354 | Cromer | May 2001 | B1 |
6269650 | Shaw | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318106 | Maeda | Nov 2001 | B1 |
RE37464 | Meckler | Dec 2001 | E |
6363218 | Lowenstein et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6412295 | Weiss et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6442951 | Maeda et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494053 | Forkosh | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497107 | Maisotsenko et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6532763 | Gupte | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546746 | Forkosh et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568466 | Lowenstein et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575228 | Ragland et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598862 | Merrill et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6635104 | Komkova et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644059 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684649 | Thompson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6709492 | Spadaccini et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720990 | Walker et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6739142 | Korin | May 2004 | B2 |
6745826 | Lowenstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751964 | Fischer | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800118 | Kusunose et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6841601 | Serpico et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848265 | Lowenstein et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854278 | Maisotsenko et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864005 | Mossman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6935416 | Tsunoda et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6973795 | Moffitt | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976365 | Forkosh et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978633 | Yamazaki | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000427 | Mathias et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017356 | Moffitt | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7092006 | Walker et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093452 | Chee et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093649 | Dawson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
RE39288 | Assaf | Sep 2006 | E |
7178355 | Moffitt | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181918 | Reinders et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7269966 | Lowenstein et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7306650 | Slayzak et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331376 | Gagnon et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340906 | Moffitt | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7389646 | Moffitt | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389652 | Fair | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7593033 | Walker et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602414 | Walker et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7605840 | Walker et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7717404 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719565 | Walker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7737224 | Willis et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753991 | Kertzman | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7781034 | Yializis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7817182 | Walker et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7942387 | Forkosh | May 2011 | B2 |
7966841 | Lowenstein et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002023 | Murayama | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033532 | Yabu | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8137436 | Calis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157891 | Montie et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8318824 | Matsuoka et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8511074 | Kuehnel et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8550151 | Murayama et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8769971 | Kozubal et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783053 | McCann | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8887523 | Gommed et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8899061 | Reytblat | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8920699 | Marutani et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8943848 | Phannavong et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966924 | Pichai | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9027764 | Marutani et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9109808 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9188349 | Warmerdam et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9234665 | Erb et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9243810 | Vandermeulen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9273877 | Vandermeulen | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9429332 | Vandermeulen et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9810439 | Coutu | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9816760 | LePoudre et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9909768 | Gerber et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10302317 | Besant et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10352628 | Erb et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10480801 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10584884 | Coutu et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010003902 | Kopko | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020005271 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038552 | Maisotsenko | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020158023 | Wurzburger | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014983 | Maisotsenko et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037905 | Weng | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070787 | Moffitt | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030121271 | Dinnage et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132166 | Rey | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000152 | Fischer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040055329 | Mathias et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061245 | Maisotsenko et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134212 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168462 | Assaf | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040226685 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050056042 | Bourne et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072303 | Weidenmann | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050230080 | Paul et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249901 | Yializis et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279115 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021615 | Kertzman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042295 | Assaf | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060205301 | Klare et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070029685 | Lin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056894 | Connors, Jr. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070068663 | Thomer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070234743 | Assaf | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070279861 | Doll et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023182 | Beamer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080066888 | Tong et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085437 | Dean et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099184 | Han | May 2008 | A1 |
20080283217 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090095162 | Hargis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090126913 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133866 | Campbell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090193974 | Montie et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211977 | Miller | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090294110 | Foust | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324929 | Yamakawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100090356 | Sines et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100170776 | Ehrenberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181062 | Mccann | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192605 | Fang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100200068 | D'arcy et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100275629 | Erickson | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300123 | Park et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319370 | Kozubal et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326914 | Drost et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110056384 | Kadota | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110192579 | Sotokawa et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223486 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232485 | Ellsworth | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110232633 | Lima | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110259572 | Muratani et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110308265 | Phannavong et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000227 | Matsuura et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120031133 | Kuwabara et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120061045 | Huizing | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120073791 | Dubois | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085112 | Wintemute | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106073 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125020 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125021 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125023 | Kopko et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125031 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125405 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125581 | Allen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131934 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131937 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131938 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131939 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131940 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132513 | Vandermeulen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120162918 | Thyni et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168369 | Van Medevoort et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186281 | Vandermeulen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120247132 | Lakdawala et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120298340 | Al-Otaibi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130056177 | Coutu et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130186121 | Erb et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130199220 | Ma et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130240438 | Willis et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248147 | Wintemute et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130283837 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340449 | Kozubal et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140054004 | LePoudre et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140054013 | LePoudre et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140083648 | Wawryk | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140190037 | Erb et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140245769 | Vandermeulen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260367 | Coutu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260369 | Lepoudre et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260373 | Gerber et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260399 | Vandermeulen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262125 | Erb et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262144 | Erb et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140326433 | Kozubal | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150096714 | Dagley | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150184876 | Vandermeulen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150292754 | Mongar | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150323203 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160084512 | Erb et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160187010 | Vandermeulen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160290666 | Coutu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298865 | Gerber et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160327345 | Lowenstein | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170241655 | Lepoudre et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180073753 | Lepoudre et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180128510 | Lepoudre et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180135880 | Ghadiri Moghaddam et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180187918 | Lepoudre et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190212020 | Besant et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190346212 | Norman Erb et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011286700 | Dec 2012 | AU |
2011268661 | Jan 2013 | AU |
2014231672 | Mar 2018 | AU |
2015230799 | Mar 2018 | AU |
2013305427 | Apr 2018 | AU |
2014231681 | Jun 2018 | AU |
2013305428 | Sep 2018 | AU |
2014231668 | Feb 2019 | AU |
2014231667 | Jun 2019 | AU |
2017204552 | Jul 2019 | AU |
2283089 | Nov 2000 | CA |
2801352 | Dec 2011 | CA |
2801352 | Dec 2011 | CA |
2798928 | Feb 2012 | CA |
2843763 | Mar 2013 | CA |
2904224 | Sep 2014 | CA |
2901483 | Apr 2019 | CA |
193732 | Oct 1937 | CH |
1163389 | Oct 1997 | CN |
1343292 | Apr 2002 | CN |
1456855 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1517610 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1518477 | Aug 2004 | CN |
1666081 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1711448 | Dec 2005 | CN |
2821506 | Sep 2006 | CN |
200958820 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101368754 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101405559 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101421580 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101469090 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101776406 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101900385 | Dec 2010 | CN |
101918777 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102076401 | May 2011 | CN |
201906567 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102165268 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102232015 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102345909 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102395419 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102548727 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102549361 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102713154 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102933931 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102939397 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103068246 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103069246 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103827595 | May 2014 | CN |
104048434 | Sep 2014 | CN |
203893703 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104136855 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104583706 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105121989 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105164474 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105283715 | Jan 2016 | CN |
101512238 | Aug 2016 | CN |
105164484 | Jun 2017 | CN |
105121989 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107249715 | Oct 2017 | CN |
107300230 | Oct 2017 | CN |
107560482 | Jan 2018 | CN |
107850335 | Mar 2018 | CN |
107923647 | Apr 2018 | CN |
108027221 | May 2018 | CN |
109028519 | Dec 2018 | CN |
109073265 | Dec 2018 | CN |
110345803 | Oct 2019 | CN |
10143092 | Mar 2003 | DE |
0448991 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0661502 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0678321 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1108575 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2751493 | Mar 2018 | EP |
3314188 | May 2018 | EP |
2893283 | Dec 2018 | EP |
2972039 | Dec 2018 | EP |
2971993 | Aug 2019 | EP |
2971992 | Jan 2020 | EP |
2291457 | Jun 1976 | FR |
1354502 | Jun 1974 | GB |
201717044889 | Mar 2018 | IN |
201717044890 | Mar 2018 | IN |
201817002765 | Apr 2018 | IN |
201817037404 | Dec 2018 | IN |
61-52594 | Mar 1986 | JP |
05-157282 | Jun 1993 | JP |
H09113167 | May 1997 | JP |
09-196482 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-170177 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2004116419 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2008-070046 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009-275955 | Nov 2009 | JP |
4870843 | Nov 2011 | JP |
20110092773 | Aug 2011 | KR |
10201809840VA | Dec 2018 | SG |
I271499 | Jan 2007 | TW |
WO-96041107 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-99014535 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-0135039 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-03049835 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO-2004065875 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2005100243 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2008037079 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008053367 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008089484 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2009094032 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009158030 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010006968 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2011062808 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011161547 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011161547 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012018089 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012042553 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012050860 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012087273 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012167366 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013029148 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013094206 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO-2013107554 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2013192397 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO-2014029003 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014029004 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014107790 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO-2014138847 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014138859 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014138860 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014138846 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014138851 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014142277 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2016026042 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO-2017152268 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“AAONAIRE® Energy Recovery Units Users Information Manual”, R86610 (Rev. A 8-06), (Aug. 2006), 16 pgs. |
“Advances in Desiccant-Based Dehumidification”, (C) 2005 American Standard, TRANE Engineers Newsletter; vol. 34-4, (2005), 1-8. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/048,797, Amendment and Response filed Apr. 29, 2003 to Non-Final Office dated Mar. 11, 2003”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/048,797, Non-Final Office dated Mar. 11, 2003”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/048,797, Notice of Allowance dated May 13, 2003”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Final Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2016”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 10, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 4, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Response filed Jan. 29, 2015 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 5, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Response filed Jul. 17, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Response filed Nov. 16, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2015”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 5, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Appeal Brief filed Jun. 15, 2015”, 82 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Final Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2015”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 1, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 25, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Post Allowance Amendment filed Oct. 7, 2015”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Oct. 19, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, Response filed Dec. 15, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2014”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Appeal Brief filed Jun. 9, 2016”, 33 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2016”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Non Final Office Action dated May 7, 2015”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed Apr. 23, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 13, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed Jul. 17, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated May 7, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed Nov. 30, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 13, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Appeal Brief filed Jun. 9, 2016”, 29 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 31, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Response filed Nov. 20, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, 312 Amendment filed Jun. 18, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, Notice of Allowance dated May 19, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, PTO Response to 312 Amendment dated Jul. 9, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, Response filed Jan. 7, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 10, 2014”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, Response filed Mar. 31, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 10, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Advisory Action dated Nov. 10, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016”, 36 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2016”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Non Final Office Action dated May 2, 2016”, 35 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Response filed Mar. 28, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2016”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Response filed Jun. 9, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated May 2, 2016”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Response filed Oct. 28, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Response filed Dec. 3, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 16, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Response filed Dec. 15, 2016 to Advisory Action dated Nov. 10, 2016”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 16, 2015”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Advisory Action dated Nov. 10, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed Feb. 25, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 16, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed May 26, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed Oct. 28, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed Dec. 21, 2016 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2016 and Advisory Action dated Nov. 10, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 16, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 13, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 27, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Response filed Dec. 15, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2017”, 19 pgs. |
“Ashrae Technical Committee”, Meeting Programs, (Jan. 29, 1997), 13 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011268661, First Examiner Report dated Sep. 24, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011268661, Response filed Jul. 20, 2015 to First Examiner Report dated Sep. 24, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011268661, Response filed Sep. 23, 2015 to Second Examiner Report dated Aug. 18, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2011268661, Second Examiner Report dated Aug. 18, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012304223, First Examiner Report dated Aug. 5, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2012304223, Response filed Feb. 16, 2017 to First Examiner Report dated Aug. 5, 2016”, 25 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2013305427, Examination Report dated Mar. 3, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Response filed Feb. 8, 2017 to Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2016”, 89 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,843,763, Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,843,763, Response filed May 12, 2015 to Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2014”, 31 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,483, Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“Chapter 8—Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Demonstration”, HVAC Demonstration, (published prior to Feb. 21, 2014), 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2014”, (w/ English Translation), 19 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Response filed Apr. 27, 2015 to Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 15 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Response filed Sep. 26, 2014 to Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2014”, (w/ English Translation), 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180031103.9, Response filed Sep. 29, 2015 to Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 78 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280042778.8, Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280042778.8, Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280042778.8, Response filed May 25, 2016 to Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016”, Without English Translation of Claims, 46 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280042778.8, Response filed Nov. 16, 2016 to Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2016”, Without English Translation of Claims, 43 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 15 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Response filed Feb. 13, 2017 to Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation of Amended Claims), 56 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Response filed Jul. 7, 2016 to Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2017”, (w/ English Translation), 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Response filed Oct. 12, 2016 to Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 54 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015422.4, Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015766.5, Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016”, (w/ English Translation), 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015766.5, Response filed Jan. 20, 2017 to Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 52 pgs. |
“Dehumidification Solutions”, Des Champs Laboratories, Inc., (2001), 18 pgs. |
“Desi-Wringer# Precision Desiccant Dehumidification Systems”, Des Champs Technologies, (2007), 12 pgs. |
“Energy Recovery—Fresh In Air Quality”, SEMCO Inc., (published before Apr. 12, 2012), 131 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11797695.1, Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 25, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11797695.1, Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 7, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11797695.1, Response filed Aug. 22, 2016 to Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12827918.9, Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 6, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12827918.9, Response filed Sep. 28, 2015 to Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 6, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13830357.3, Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13830357.3, Response filed Dec. 23, 2016 to Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13830940.6, Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 4, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13830940.6, Response filed Jan. 16, 2017 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC dated Jul. 21, 2016”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764192.2, Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764192.2, Response filed Jan. 30, 2017 to Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2016”, 19 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764192.2, Response filed Apr. 13, 2016 to Communication Pursuant Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated Nov. 19, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764305.0, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 4, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764305.0, Response filed Apr. 13, 2016 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 8, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764318.3, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 15, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764318.3, Response filed Jan. 28, 2016 to Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC dated Nov. 19, 2015”, 17 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764713.5, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 9, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764713.5, Response filed Jan. 28, 2016 to Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC dated Dec. 2, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 28, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Response filed Jan. 29, 2016 to Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2012/000749, International Search Report dated Oct. 26, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2012/000749, Written Opinion dated Oct. 26, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000608, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 5, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000608, International Search Report dated Sep. 23, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000608, Written Opinion dated Sep. 23, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000609, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 5, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000609, International Search Report dated Sep. 17, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000609, Written Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000964, International Search Report dated Feb. 7, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2013/000964, Written Opinion dated Feb. 7, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000048, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000048, International Search Report dated Apr. 29, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000048, Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000083, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000083, International Search Report dated May 14, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000083, Written Opinion dated May 14, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000148, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000148, International Search Report dated May 9, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000148, Written Opinion dated May 9, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000169, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000169, International Search Report dated May 27, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000169, Written Opinion dated May 27, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000171, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 24, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000171, International Search Report dated May 27, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2014/000171, Written Opinion dated May 27, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2015/050787, International Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2015/050787, Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050252, International Search Report dated May 26, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050252, Written Opinion dated May 26, 2016”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050507, International Search Report dated Jul. 21, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050507, Written Opinion dated Jul. 21, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/002145, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 10, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/002145, International Search Report dated Feb. 15, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2011/002145, Written Opinion dated Feb. 15, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2016/053799, International Search Report dated Aug. 26, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2016/053799, Written Opinion dated Aug. 26, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US00/02956, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 9, 2001”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US00/02956, International Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2000”, 1 pg. |
“Two-Wheel Desiccant Dehumidification System—Technology for Dehumidification and Improving Indoor Air Quality”, Federal Technology Alert, (Apr. 1997), 24 pgs. |
Abdel-Salam, Mohamed R. H., et al., “Experimental Study of Effects of Phase-Change Energy and Operating Parameters on Performances of Two-Fluid and Three-Fluid Liquid-to-Air Membrane Energy Exchangers”, ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 122, Part 1, (Jan. 2016), 134-145. |
Abdel-Salam, Mohamed R. H., et al., “Performance testing of 2-fluid and 3-fluid liquid-to-air membrane energy exchangers for HVAC applications in cold-dry climates”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 106, (2017), 558-569. |
Abdel-Salam, Mohamed R. H., et al., “Performance testing of a novel 3-fluid liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger (3-fluid LAMEE) under desiccant solution regeneration operating conditions”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 95, (2015), 773-786. |
Acker, William, “Industrial Dehumidification: Water Vapor Load Calculations And System Descriptions”, HPAC Heatina/Pioina/Air Conditionina, (Mar. 1999), 49-59. |
Bellia, L., et al., “Air Conditioning Systems With Desiccant Wheel for Italian Climates”, International Journal on Architectural Science vol. 1 No. 4, (2000), 193-213. |
Bergero, Stefano, et al., “On the performances of a hybrid air-conditioning system in different climatic conditions”, Energy 36(8), (2011), 5261-5273. |
Bergero, Stefano, et al., “Performance analysis of a liquid desiccant and membrane contactor hybrid air-conditioning system”, Bergero, Chiari, Energy and Buildings, (2010), 11 pgs. |
Chant, Eileen E., et al., “A Steady-State Simulation Of An Advanced Desiccant-Enhanced Cooling And Dehumidification System”, ASHRAE Transactions: Research, (Jul. 1992), 339-347. |
Coad, William J., “Conditioning Ventilation Air for Improved Performance and Air Quality”, HPAC Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning, (Sep. 1999), 6 pgs. |
Diblasio, Robert, “Desicants in Hospitals—Conditioning A Research Facility”, DiBLASIO Engineered Systems, (Sep. 1995), 4 pgs. |
Downing, et al., “Operation and Maintenance for Quality Indoor Air”, Proceedings of the 7th Symposium On Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, Ft. Worth, TX, (Oct. 9, 1990), 5 pgs. |
Downing, Chris, “Humidity Control—No Place Like Home”, Engineered Systems, (1996), 4 pgs. |
Erb, Blake, et al., “Experimental Measurements of a Run-Around Membrane Energy Exchanger (RAMEE) with Comparison to a Numerical Model”, ASHRAE Transactions, (2009). |
Fischer, J., et al., “Active Desiccant Dehumidification Module Integration With Rooftop Packaged HVAC Units—Final Report Phase 3B”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (Mar. 2002), 36 pgs. |
Fischer, John C., “Optimizing IAQ, Humidity Control, and Energy Efficiency In School Environments Through The Application Of Desiccant-Based Total Energy Recovery Systems”, IAQ '96. Atlanta: Paths to Better Building Environments/Environmental Effects on Heath and Productivity, (1996), 179-194. |
Harriman, III, et al., “Dehumidification and Cooling Loads From Ventilation Air”, ASHRAE Journal, (Nov. 1997), 7 pgs. |
Harriman, III, et al., “Evaluating Active Desiccant Systems For Ventilating Commercial Buildings”, ASHRAE Journal, (Oct. 1999), 7 pgs. |
Harriman, III, et al., “New Weather Data For Energy Calculations”, ASHRAE Journal, (Mar. 1999), 7 pgs. |
Jeong, et al., “Energy Conservation Benefits of a Dedicated Outdoor Air System with Parallel Sensible Cooling By Ceiling Radiant Panels”, ASHRAE Transactions; vol. 109⋅ Part 2, (2003), 10 pgs. |
Karniadakis, George E., et al., “Mimimum-dissipation transport enhancement by flow destabilization: Reynolds' analogy revisited”, J. Fluid Mech vol. 192, (1988), 365-391. |
Kosar, Douglas R., et al., “Dehumidification Issues of Standard 62-1989”, ASHARE Journal, (Mar. 1998), 71-75. |
Larson, Michael David, et al., “The Performance of Membranes in a Newly Proposed Run-Around Heat and Mositure Exchanger”, Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Mechanical Engineering UniversitY of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Canada, http/ /lib ran. usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12192006-094159/umestricted/Larson Thesis.pdf, (Dec. 2006), 177 pgs. |
Mahmud, Khizir, “Design and Performance Testing of Counter-Cross-Flow Run-Around Membrane Energy Exchanger System”, Master Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Canada, http I /libran⋅. usask. ca/theses/ available/ etd-09092009-223 83 3/umestricted/Khizir_Mahmud 2009-Sep-28a. pdf, (Sep. 2009), 176 pgs. |
Mahmud, Khizir, et al., “Performance testing of a counter-cross-flow run-around membrane energy exchanger (RAMEE) system for HVAC applications”, Energy and Buildings, 42, (2010), 1140-1146. |
McGahey, Kevin, et al., “Desiccants: Benefits for the Second Century of Air Conditioning”, Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium On Improving Building Systems In Hot and Humid Climates, Ft. Worth, Texas, (May 14, 1996), 9 pgs. |
McGahey, Kevin, “New Commercial Applications For Desiccant-Based Cooling”, ASHARE Journal, (Jul. 1998), 41-45. |
Mumma, Stanley A., et al., “Achieving Dry Outside Air in an Energy-Efficient Manner”, ASH RAE Transactions 2001; vol. 107; Part 1, (2001), 8 pgs. |
Mumma, Stanley A., “Dedicated Outdoor Air-Dual Wheel System Control Requirements”, ASHRAE Transactions 2001; vol. 107; Part 1, (2001), 9 pgs. |
Mumma, Stanley A., et al., “Extension of the Multiple Spaces Concept of ASH RAE Standard 62 to Include Infiltration, Exhaust/Exfiltration, Interzonal Transfer, and Additional Short-Circuit Paths”, ASHRAE Transactions: Symposia, (1998), 1232-1241. |
Mumma, Stanley A, “Overview of Integrating Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems With Parallel Terminal Systems”, ASH RAE Transactions vol. 107; Part 1, (2001), 7 pgs. |
Nimmo, B. G., et al., “DEAC: Desiccant Enhancement of Cooling-Based Dehumidification”, ASHRAE Transactions: Symposia, (1993), 842-848. |
Qin, C. K., et al., “Engine-driven Desiccant-assisted Hybrid Air-conditioning System”, 23rd World Gas Conference, Amsterdam, (2006), 15 pgs. |
Ryan, K., et al., “Three-dimensional transition in the wake of bluff elongated cylinders”, J. Fluid, Mech vol. 538, (2005), 1-29. |
Scofield, et al., “HVAC Design for Classrooms: Divide and Conquer”, Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning, (May 1993), 53-59. |
Sevigny, et al., “Air Handling Unit Direct Digital Control System Retrofit To Provide Acceptable Indoor Air Quality And Global Energy Optimization”, Energy Engineering; vol. 94; No. 5, (1997), 24-43. |
Shank, et al., “Selecting the Supply Air Conditions for a Dedicated Outdoor Air System Working in Parallel with Distributed Sensible Cooling Terminal Equipment”, ASHRAE Transactions vol. 107; Part 1, (2001), 10 pgs. |
Smith, Christopher S., et al., “Outdoor Air, Heat Wheels and JC Penny: A New Approach to Retail Ventilation”, Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium On Improving Building Systems In Hot and Humid Climates, Ft. Worth, Texas, (Jun. 2, 1998), 1 pg. |
Smith, James C., “Schools Resolve IAQ/Humidity Problems with Desiccant Preconditioning”, Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning, (Apr. 1996), 6 pgs. |
Swails, James F., et al., “A Cure for Growing Pains”, Consulting Specifying Engineer, [Online] retrieved from the internet:www.csermag.com, (Jun. 1997), 4 pgs. |
Turpin, Joanna, “Dehumidification: The Problem No One Wants To Talk About (Apr. 2000)”, [online] [retrieved on May 6, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet:http//www.esmagazine.com/copyrighVde12c1c879ba801 0VgnVCM1 00000f932a8c0_?>, (posted on Apr. 5, 2000), 6 pgs. |
Vali, et al., “Numerical model and effectiveness correlations for a run-around heat recovery system with combined counter and cross flow exchangers”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52, (2009), 5827-5840 pgs. |
Vali, Alireza, “Modeling a Run-Around Heat and Moisture Exchanger Using Two Counter/Cross Flow Exchangers”, Master Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Canada, http:/ /library. usask.ca/theses/m ailable/etd-060 3 2009-15-J.6-J.-1./unrestricted/ Vali.Alireza Thesis. pdf, (2009), 193 pgs. |
Woods, J, et al., “Desiccant Enhanced Evaporative Air Conditioning: Parametric Analysis and Design”, Presented at the Second International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE2012), Conference Paper, (Oct. 2012), 10 pgs. |
Yborra, Stephen C., “Field Evaluation of Desiccant-Integrated HVAC Systems: A Review of Case Studies in Multiple Commercial/Institutional Building Types”, Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium On Improving Building Systems In Hot and Humid Climates, Ft. Worth, Texas, (Jun. 2, 1998), 361-370. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Amendment and Response Under 37 C.F.R. 1.116 Filed Jan. 22, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Appeal Decision dated Nov. 22, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 3, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2017”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2017”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed Jun. 8, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Response filed Nov. 27, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2017”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Response filed Jul. 12, 2017 to Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 12, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Response filed Nov. 9, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Non Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Response filed Aug. 21, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Notice of Allowance dated May 9, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 7, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2017”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Response filed Aug. 3, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2017”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2013305427, Response filed Oct. 10, 2017 to Examination Report dated Mar. 3, 2017”, 30 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2013305428, Office Action dated May 30, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231668, First Examination Report dated Dec. 6, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231672, First Examiners Report dated Jul. 14, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231672, Response filed Oct. 9, 2017 to First Examiners Report dated Jul. 14, 2017”, 24 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231680, First Examiners Report dated Aug. 4, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, First Examiners Report dated Jul. 12, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, Response filed Sep. 15, 2017 to First Examiners Report dated Jul. 12, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Sep. 26, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2015230799, First Examiner Report dated Mar. 27, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Response filed Dec. 18, 2017 to Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,483, Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,483, Response filed Jan. 16, 2018 to Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2017”, 28 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,483, Response filed May 23, 2017 to Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2016”, 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Office Action dated May 11, 2017”, W/ English Translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Response filed Sep. 26, 2017 to Office Action dated May 11, 2017”, claims not amended in response, current pending claims included in attachment, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2017”, With English Translation, 21 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Response filed Mar. 28, 2017 to Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2017”, (wl English Translation of Claims), 58 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Response filed Oct. 12, 2017 to Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2017”, w/ claims in English, 54 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480014783.7, Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2017”, (English Translation), 19 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480014783.7, Response filed Nov. 10, 2017 to Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2017”, w/ claims in English, 48 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017”, w/ English translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Response filed Jun. 13, 2017 to Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2016”, (w/ English Translation of Claims), 36 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015422.4, Response filed May 12, 2017 to Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016”, w/ claims in English, 47 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480016150.X, Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2017”, (w/ English Translation), 22 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480016150.X, Response filed Nov. 2, 2017 to Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2017”, w/ claims in English, 82 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764305.0, Response filed Oct. 31, 2017 to Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 4, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764318.3, Response filed Oct. 10, 2017 to Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 15, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764713.5, Response filed Jul. 13, 2017 to Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 9, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Response filed May 25, 2017 to Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 28, 2016”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15834201.4, Response filed Oct. 9, 2017 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated Mar. 29, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050252, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 30, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2016/050507, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 30, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2017/050180, International Search Report dated Apr. 26, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2017/050180, Written Opinion dated Apr. 26, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2016/053799, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 4, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
Mahmud, Khizir, et al., “Performance testing of a counter-cross-flow run-around membrane energy exchanger (RAMEE) system for HVAC applications”, Energy and Buildings 42, (2010), 1139-1147. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Response filed Jul. 20, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2018”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2018”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2018”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed May 21, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 18, 2018”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated May 23, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2018”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2018”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Response filed Apr. 27, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated May 16, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 27, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Response filed Apr. 3, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2018”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Response filed Aug. 6, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2018”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 21, 2018”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Response filed Feb. 20, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2013305428, Response filed May 15, 2018 to Office Action dated May 30, 2017”, 23 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231667, First Examination Report dated Apr. 5, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231667, Response filed Jul. 20, 2018 to First Examination Report dated Apr. 5, 2018”, 19 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231668, Response filed Mar. 14, 2018 to First Examination Report dated Dec. 6, 2017”, 31 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231668, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Apr. 5, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, Response filed Jan. 30, 2018 to Subsequent Examiners Report dated Sep. 26, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, Response filed Apr. 26, 2018 to Subsequent Examiners Report dated Mar. 13, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231681, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Mar. 13, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2015230799, Response filed Feb. 16, 2018 to First Examiner Report dated Mar. 27, 2017”, 24 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 5, 2018”, w/ English Claims, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Request for Reexamination filed Apr. 20, 2018 to Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 5, 2018”, w/ English claims, 52 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Examiner Interview Summary Jan. 3, 2018”, w/ English Translation, 1 pg. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380044484.3, Response filed Jan. 3, 2018 to Examiner Interview Summary Jan. 3, 2018”, w/ English claims, 53 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480014783.7, Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2018”, w/ English Translation, 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480014783.7, Response filed Jun. 11, 2018 to Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2018”, w/ English claims, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2018”, w/ English summary, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Response filed Feb. 28, 2018 to Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2017”, w/ English claims, 36 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15834201.4, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795581.4, Response filed Aug. 6, 2018 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated Jan. 26, 2018”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795582.2, Response filed Jul. 17, 2018 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC dated Jan. 8, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18153408.2, Communication Pursuant to Rule 55 EPC dated May 17, 2018”, 2 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,201, filed Nov. 15, 2017, Using Liquid to Air Membrane Energy Exchanger for Liquid Cooling. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, filed Dec. 21, 2017, Three-Fluid Liquid to Air Membrane Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, filed May 9, 2017, Liquid Panel Assembly. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/163,731, filed Nov. 5, 1999, Humidity Pump. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,205, filed Nov. 15, 2017, Systems and Methods for Managing Conditions in Enclosed Space. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/814,153, filed Nov. 15, 2017, Systems and Methods for Providing Cooling to a Heat Load. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/083,280, filed Sep. 7, 2018, Systems and Methods for Providing Cooling to a Heat Load. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,598, filed Apr. 18, 2012, Energy Exchange System for Conditioning Air in an Enclosed Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, filed Jun. 17, 2016, Energy Exchange System for Conditioning Air in an Enclosed Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/702,596, filed Apr. 15, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,234,665, Liquid-to-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, filed Dec. 3, 2015, Liquid-to-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/737,473, filed Jan. 9, 2013, System and Method for Providing Conditioned Air to an Enclosed Structure. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,152, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Liquid Panel Assembly. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Membrane Support Assembly for an Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, filed Feb. 24, 2014, Evaporative Cooling System with Liquid-to-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/801,280, filed Mar. 13, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,109,808, Variable Desiccant Control Energy Exchange System and Method. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/804,953, filed Jul. 21, 2015, Variable Desiccant Control Energy Exchange System and Method. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, filed Jun. 17, 2016, Variable Desiccant Control Energy Exchange System and Method. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, filed Feb. 27, 2014, Energy Exchange Assembly with Microporous Membrane. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, filed Feb. 26, 2014, Membrane-Integrated Energy Exchange Assembly. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, filed Feb. 4, 2014, Control System and Method for a Liquid Desiccant Air Delivery System. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/048,797, filed Jan. 31, 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,649, Enthalpy Pump. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed Dec. 13, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Advisory Action dated Dec. 17, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Amendment and Response filed Nov. 30, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2018”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 31, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Response filed Sep. 11, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Final Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, Response filed Nov. 19, 2018 to Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 21, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,201, Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 5, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/574,205, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Advisory Action dated Dec. 12, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Response filed Nov. 30, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 26, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231667, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Aug. 29, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2017204552, First Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Notice of Reexamination dated Aug. 23, 2018”, w/ English Machine Translation, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Response filed Dec. 7, 2018 to Notice of Reexamination dated Aug. 23, 2018”, w/ English Translation, 15 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Response filed Dec. 4, 2018 to Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2018”, w/ English claims, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11797695.1, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Aug. 24, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764713.5, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 18, 2018”, 3 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15834201.4, Response filed Oct. 15, 2018 to Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2018”, 17 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795582.2, Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18153408.2, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 4, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2017/050180, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 20, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 6, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Response filed Dec. 19, 2019 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2019”; 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2019”, 7 pgs |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2015306040, First Examination Report dated Nov. 8, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,880,353, Response filed Oct. 29, 2019 to Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2019”, 28 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,484, Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,046,529, Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2019”, 6 pgs |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201580053421.3, Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 31 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680048895.3, Response filed Nov. 4, 2019 to Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2019”, w/ English claims, 29 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710708143.1; Response filed Sep. 27, 2019 to Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2019”, wl English claims, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795581.4, Response filed Sep. 11, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2019”, 14 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16813836.0, Response to Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 25, 2019”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17762365.9, Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 17, 2019”, 8 pgs. |
Abdel-Salam, Mohamed R.H., et al., “Design and testing of a novel 3-fluid liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger (3-fluid LAMEE)”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 92, (2016), 312-329. |
Abdel-Salam, Mohamed R.H., et al., “Performance Testing of a Novel 3-Fluid Liquid-to-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger (3-Fluid LAMEE) for HVAC Applications”, 28th Intl. Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS), Pau, France, (Jun. 30, 2015), 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Final Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2019”, 50 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2018”, 50 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/797,062, Response filed Jun. 28, 2019 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 28, 1019”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/171,951, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 9, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/187,413, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2019”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/190,715, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2019”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,019, Response filed Jun. 10, 2019 to Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2019”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Feb. 1, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/957,795, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 15, 2019”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Corrected Notice of Allowability dated May 22, 2019”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 21, 2019”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 25, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2019”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,155, Response filed Mar. 5, 2019 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2019”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2019”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,180, Response filed May 1, 2019 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2019”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2019”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2019”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Response filed Apr. 18, 2019 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2019”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 1, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,016, Response filed Jan. 28, 2019 to Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 26, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,397, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 2, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2014231667, Response filed Jan. 15, 2019 to Subsequent Examiners Report dated Aug. 29, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018202342, First Examination Report dated Jun. 17, 2019”, 5 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018202342, Response filed Aug. 1, 2019 to First Examination Report dated Jun. 17, 2019”, 17 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018202342, Subsequent Examiners Report dated Aug. 23, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018204774, First Examination Report dated Jul. 18, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2018226496, First Examination Report dated Jul. 25, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Australian Application Serial No. 2019201063, First Examination Report dated Aug. 6, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,801,352, Response filed Jan. 29, 2019 to Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,880,350, Examiner's Rule 30(2) Requisition dated May 1, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,880,353, Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380042926.0, Decision of Reexamination—Upholding Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 15, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 18 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201480015355.6, Decision of Rejection dated Mar. 18, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680038134.X, Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 30 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680038135.4, Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2019”, w/o English Translation, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680048895.3, Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2019”, W/ English Translation, 33 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710339973.1, Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710339973.1, Response filed Jul. 3, 2019 to Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2019”, w/ English Claims, 14 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710708143.1, Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710708143.1, Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2018”, w/ English Translation, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201710708143.1, Response filed Apr. 29, 2019 to Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2018”, w/ English Claims, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11797695.1, Response filed Jan. 9, 2019 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Aug. 24, 2018”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764305.0, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Feb. 14, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764305.0, Response filed Jun. 21, 2019 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC Feb. 14, 2019”, 24 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14764713.5, Response filed Jun. 28, 2019 to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 18, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 14765396.8, Response filed May 23, 2019 to Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795581.4, Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2019”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16795582.2, Response filed Jun. 17, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2018”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16813836.0, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 25, 2019”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 16813836.0, Partial Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17762365.9, Response filed Apr. 25, 2019 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161 and 162 dated Oct. 16, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18153408.2, Response filed Jul. 2, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 4, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18160812.6, Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 11, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18160812.6, Response filed Aug. 6, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 11, 2019”, 23 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18211142.7, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 11, 2019”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18211142.7, Response filed Aug. 8, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 11, 2019”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18214518.5, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 17, 2019”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18214518.5, Response filed Jul. 16, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 17, 2019”, 3 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201710777Y, Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2019”, in English, 7 pgs. |
“Singapore Application Serial No. 11201710777Y, Response filed Jul. 1, 2019 to Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2019”, in English, 31 pgs. |
“Singaporean Application Serial No. 11201709404P, Response filed Jul. 22, 2019 to Written Opinion dated Feb. 22, 2019”, in English, 62 pgs. |
“Singaporean Application Serial No. 11201709404P, Written Opinion dated Feb. 22, 2019”, in English, 8 pgs. |
Larson, Michael D., et al., “The elastic and moisture transfer properties of polyethylene and polypropylene membranes for use in liquid-to-air energy exchangers”, Journal of Membrane Science 302, (2007), 14 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/351,046, filed Mar. 12, 2019, Liquid-To-Air Membrane Energy Exchanger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,397, filed Jun. 4, 2019, Membrane-Integrated Energy Exchange Assembly. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,046,529, Response filed Nov. 14, 2019 to Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2019”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,685, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2020”, 15 pgs. |
“Indian Application Serial No. 201817002765, First Examination Report dated Dec. 24, 2019”, w/ English Translation, 6 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,904,224, Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2020”, 4 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201680038134.X, Response filed Jan. 23, 2020 to Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2019”, w/ English claims, 32 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,492, Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020”, 4 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,901,495, Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2020”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/784,822, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 14, 2020”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810432187.0, Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2020”, w/o English Translation, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160054012 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62039254 | Aug 2014 | US |