The invention will be better understood and other features and advantages will become apparent by reading the detailed description of the invention, taken together with the drawings, wherein:
a and 2b respectively show a cross sectional side view and a top view of the selectively coated positive cathode according to a first embodiment of the invention, while
c shows a cross sectional top view of the jellyroll assembly created according to this embodiment.
a,
3
b and 3c respectively show a cross sectional side view, a top view and a bottom plan view of the selectively coated positive cathode according to a second embodiment of the invention, while
a,
4
b and 4c respectively show a cross sectional side view, a top view and a bottom plan view of the selectively coated positive cathode according to a third embodiment of the invention, while
a,
5
b and 5c respectively show a cross sectional side view, a top view and a bottom plan view of the selectively coated positive cathode according to a fourth embodiment of the invention, while
a and 6b show general top and/or bottom views of an alternative selectively coated positive cathode that could be implemented in any of the aforementioned embodiments of the invention.
The electrochemical cells of the invention are normally cylindrical in shape and preferably have a maximum height greater than the maximum diameter, with the cylindrical container having a greater interior volumetric capacity than the cover or end cap. Preferably, the dimensions of the cells will match standardized sizes (e.g., IEC, etc.), including but not limited to “AA”, “AAA” and “AAAA” sizes. However, the invention can also be adapted to other cell sizes and shapes and to cells incorporating an oval or circular jellyroll electrode assembly, housing, seal and pressure relief vent designs, etc.
A preferred embodiment of the invention will be better understood with reference to
Cell closure 114 is affixed over the open end of the container 112 according to any number of known mechanisms. In a preferred embodiment, cell closure 114 comprises pressure relief vent 113, upper terminal cover 115, gasket 116 and PTC 142. Upper terminal cover 115 may be held in place by the inwardly crimped top edge of container 112 and gasket 116. In a preferred embodiment, container 112 may have a bead or reduced diameter step near the top end which axially and/or radially compresses the container 112 and the cell closure 114, thereby forming an essentially leak-proof seal. Notably, cell closure 114 (and in a more specific and preferred embodiment, gasket 116) must provide electrical insulation between the container 112 and the terminal cover 115 in order to avoid unwanted shorting of the cell 110. Cell closure 114 and container 110 work in conjunction with one another to provide a leak-proof seal for the cell internals, including electrodes 118, 120 and the non-aqueous electrolyte (not shown in
Cell container 112 is preferably a metal can with an integral closed bottom, although in some embodiments a metal tube that is initially open at both ends can be used instead of a can. The container 112 can be any suitable material with non-limiting examples including stainless steels, nickel plated stainless steels, nickel clad or nickel plated steels, aluminum and alloys thereof. For example, a diffusion annealed, low carbon, aluminum killed, SAE 2006 or equivalent steel with a grain size of ASTM 9 to 11 and equiaxed to slightly elongated grain shape is preferred in one embodiment of the invention. Choice of container material depends upon factors including, but not limited to, conductivity, corrosion resistance, compatibility with internal and active materials within the cell and cost.
Cell closure 114, and including terminal cover 115, must also be made from a conductive material, such as a metal, metal alloy or an appropriate conductive plastic. Suitable examples include, but are not limited to, those used in the construction of the container (discussed above) or other known materials possessing the other qualities discussed herein. In addition to the considerations identified in the preceding paragraph, the complexity of the cover shape, ease of forming/machining/casting/extruding and compatibility with cell internals are all factors for consideration. The cell cover 114 and/or upper terminal cover 115 may have a simple shape, such as a thick, flat disc, or may have a more complex shape, such as the cover shown in
Gasket 116 is a non-conductive portion of the cell cover and is compressed between can 112 and cover 114 to seal the peripheral edges of these components, to prevent corrosion and to inhibit leakage of electrolyte through, around or between these components. Gasket 116 can be made of a polymeric composition, for example, a thermoplastic or thermoset polymer, the composition of which is based in part on the chemical compatibility the electrodes 118, 120 and the electrolyte used in cell 110. Examples of materials that can be used in a gasket 116 include but are not limited to, polypropylene, polyphenylene sulfide, tetrafluoride-perfluoroalkyl vinyl ether co-polymer, polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), ethylene tetrafluoroethylene, polyphthalamide, and any suitable combination or blend of the aforementioned materials. A preferred polypropylene that can be used is PRO-FAX® 6524 from Basell Polyolephins, of Wilmington, Del., USA. A preferred polyphenylene sulfide is available as TECHTRON® PPS from Boedeker Plastics, Inc. of Shiner, Tex., USA. A preferred polyphthalamide is available as Amodel® ET 1001 L from Solvay Advanced Polymers of Alpharetta, Ga. The polymers can also contain reinforcing inorganic fillers and organic compounds in addition to the base resin, such as glass fibers and the like. One significant factor in selecting a material will depend upon the low vapor transmission rate of the electrolyte for the cell, with polyphthalamides generally providing superior performance in this regard.
The gasket 116 may be coated with a sealant to provide an even better seal. Ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) is a suitable sealant material, but other suitable materials can be used.
A positive temperature coefficient (PTC) device 142 may also be disposed between the peripheral flange of terminal cover 115 and cell cover 114. PTC 142 substantially limits the flow of current under abusive electrical conditions. During normal operation of the cell 110, current flows through the PTC device 142. If the temperature of the cell 110 reaches an abnormally high level, the electrical resistance of the PTC device 142 increases to reduces the current flow, thereby allowing PTC device 142 to slow or prevent cell continued internal heating and pressure buildup resulting from electrical abuses such as external short circuiting, abnormal charging and forced deep discharging. Nevertheless, if internal pressure continues to build to the predetermined release pressure, the pressure relief vent 113 may be activated to relieve the internal pressure. Thus, the cell described herein effectively has redundant safety mechanisms, although neither such mechanism is essential to the invention described and claimed herein.
Cell closure 114 includes a pressure relief vent 113 as a safety mechanism to avoid internal pressure build up and to prevent disassembly of the cell under abusive conditions. In one embodiment, cell cover 114 includes a ball vent comprising an aperture with an inward projecting central vent well 128 with a vent hole 130 in the bottom of the well 128. The aperture is sealed by a vent ball 132 and a thin-walled thermoplastic bushing 134, which is compressed between the vertical wall of the vent well 128 and the periphery of the vent ball 132. When the cell internal pressure exceeds a predetermined level, the vent ball 132, or both the ball 132 and bushing 134, is/are forced out of the aperture to release pressurized gasses from cell 110.
The vent busing 134 is made from a thermoplastic material that is resistant to cold flow at high temperatures (e.g., 75° C.). The thermoplastic material comprises a base resin such as ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene, polybutylene terephthlate, polyphenylene sulfide, polyphthal-amide, ethylenechloro-trifluoroethylene, chlorotrifluoroethylene, perfluoroalkoxyalkane, fluorinated perfluoroethylene polypropylene and polyetherether ketone. Ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and polyphthalamide are preferred. The resin can be modified by adding a thermal-stabilizing filler to provide a vent bushing with the desired sealing and venting characteristics at high temperatures. The bushing can be injection molded from the thermoplastic material. TEFZEL® HT2004 (ETFE resin with 25 weight percent chopped glass filler) is a preferred thermoplastic material.
The vent ball 132 can be made from any suitable material that is stable in contact with the cell contents and provides the desired cell sealing and venting characteristic. Glasses or metals, such as stainless steel, can be used.
In an alternative embodiment, vent 113 may comprise a single layer or laminar foil vent. Such foil vents prevent vapor transmission and must be chemically compatible with the electrodes 118, 120 and the electrolyte. Optionally, such foil vents may also include an adhesive component activated by pressure, ultrasonic energy and/or heat in order to further perfect the seal. In a preferred embodiment, a four layered vent consisting of oriented polypropylene, polyethylene, aluminum and low density polyethylene may be used, although other materials are possible, as well as varying the number of layers in the laminate. The vent may be crimped, heat sealed and/or otherwise mechanically held in place over an aperture in the cell closure 114. Notably, use of such a vent increases the internal volume of the cell 110 available for electrochemically active materials. In particular and understanding that appropriate materials should be utilized and electrical connections must be maintained, a foil vent similar to that disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0244706, which is incorporated by reference herein, may be used.
The cell 110 includes positive electrode 118 and negative electrode 120 that are spirally-wound together in a jellyroll configuration, with a separator disposed between positive electrode 118 and negative electrode 120. In order to maximize internal cell volume, a circular electrode assembly is preferred.
Negative electrode 120 comprises a foil or sheet of pure lithium or an alloy of lithium selected to enhance the conductivity, ductility, processing capabilities or mechanical strength of the negative electrode 120. In a preferred embodiment, the lithium may be alloyed with 0.1% to 2.0% aluminum by weight, with most preferred alloy having about 0.5% aluminum by weight. Such a material is available from Chemetall Foote Corp., Kings Mountain, N.C., USA.
Depending upon the polarity of the cell, an electrically conductive member or anode tab 122 is fixedly connected to the negative electrode 118 along at least one portion of the electrode 118 to conduct current to the negative terminal of cell 110. Owing to the properties of lithium, this connection can be accomplished by way of a simple pressure contact which embeds one end of anode tab 122 within a portion of the negative electrode or by pressing an end of the member onto a surface of the lithium foil. In a preferred embodiment, the anode tab 122 is connected to the negative electrode along the outermost circumference of jellyroll electrode assembly 119, although the member may be connected at other and/or multiple locations on electrode 120.
Anode tab 122 serves as an electrical lead or tab to electrically connect the negative electrode 120 to the cell container 112. In an alternative embodiment, it is possible to create a “reversed polarity cell” wherein a electrically conductive member (not shown) makes electrical contact between negative electrode 120 and a portion of cell closure 114 thereby imparting a negative polarity to closure 114 and more specifically terminal cover 115. Such an electrically conductive member would be made from a material, preferably a metal or metal alloy selected for its ductility, mechanical strength, conductivity and compatibility with the electrochemically active materials inside cell 110, including the electrolyte. One of the preferred materials is nickel plated cold rolled steel, although steel, nickel, copper and other similar materials may be possible.
A current collector (not shown) may also be included as part of negative electrode 118, e.g., to maintain electrical continuity within the negative electrode during discharge, as the lithium is consumed. When the negative electrode includes a current collector, it may be made of copper because of its conductivity, but other conductive metals can be used as long as they are stable inside the cell. The collector itself may be integrally formed or separately attached to the lithium or lithium alloy. Such a collector is separate from, but may be used in conjunction with or in place of, the anode tab described above.
Positive electrode 118 comprises an electrochemically active material affixed on both sides of an electrically conductive foil in a selectively coated or “patterned” configuration. The foil may be aluminum or other suitable materials, allowing for appropriate rheological properties to adhere the electrochemically active material. The electrochemically active material is preferably iron disulfide. The precise properties of each will be described in greater detail below.
Positive electrode 118 is spirally wound with the negative electrode 120 with a separator (not shown, but located along all interfacial contact points between electrodes 118, 120) to form jellyroll electrode assembly 119. The positive electrode 118 forms the outer-most wind of the jellyroll configuration 119. Prior to winding, electrodes 118, 120 have a width substantially corresponding to an axis traced along the longitudinal length of container 112. The upper ends of positive electrode 118 and negative electrode 120 are preferably coextensive, with current collectors associated with each and positioned to make appropriate electrical contact with the terminals associated with the bottom or side of the container 112 and the cell closure 114. Alternatively, one of the electrodes 118 or 120 may have an edge, oriented along the top of the jellyroll electrode assembly 119, substantially equal to the upper axial end height of the separator utilized so that it does not extend thereabove, and the other electrode is deliberately sized larger to advantageously allow for enhanced electrical connection with the cell closure 114 and/or the bottom of container 112. While several embodiments below contemplate a jellyroll electrode assembly wherein the negative electrode extends partially along the outer-most circumference to allow affixing the anode tab at the outer-most circumference to avoid risk of puncturing the separator and shorting the cell, it should be understood that the positive electrode can overlap the end of the negative electrode in the jellyroll (i.e., truly form the entire outer-most layer of the jellyroll) and additional separator or insulation may be provided to address the risk of shorting.
As the positive electrode forms the vast majority of the outermost circumference of jellyroll assembly 119, the container 112 may serve as the positive terminal of the electrochemical cell 110 (with collector assembly 114 configured in conjunction with negative electrode 120 to serve as the negative terminal). Alternatively, an insulating material, such as the separator or other suitable insulating tape, may be disposed around the outer-most wind to prevent shorting of the cell 110. In this alternative, the electrochemically active material is not coated along the top axial edge of the foil carrier of positive electrode 118, thereby reducing the amount of lithium input (as compared to instances where lithium forms the outer-most wind) and generally allowing for better utilization of the electrochemically active materials in the cell (as compared to instances where iron disulfide is coated on the outer-most wind but not consumed for lack of adjacent lithium). This uncoated portion extends upward into the cell closure 114, and maybe partially collared by insulating cone 146, where it makes electrical contact with contact spring 148. Thus, the foil carrier preferably serves as a current collector for positive electrode, although a separate current collector may otherwise be provided, welded or integrally imbedded into the positive electrode surface, with similar design considerations/parameters as those described for the negative electrode collector above.
The positive electrode 118 for cell 110 may contain one or more active materials, usually in particulate form. Iron disulfide (FeS2) is the dominant (i.e., at least 50% by weight) if not exclusive electrochemically active material so as to realize the full benefits of the patterning described below, although other active materials may be used, for example Bi2O3, C2F, CFx, (CF)n, CoS2, CuO, CuS, FeS, FeCuS2, MnO2, Pb2Bi2O5 and S. Regardless, the choice of cathode material will have direct impact on the optimal electrolyte, both in terms of chemical compatibility and overall cell performance, such that the closure 114 must be specifically engineered to the materials selected.
The electrochemically active material in the positive electrode 118 is coated onto a foil carrier, such as aluminum, that is preferably less than about 500 μm (20 mils) in thickness and more preferably between 150-380 μm (6-15 mils) in thickness, inclusive of the thickness of the foil and the coating. The electrochemically active materials are usually in particulate form, with iron disulfide being the preferred active material. In a Li/FeS2 cell, the active material comprises at least greater than 50 weight percent FeS2. More preferably, the active material for a Li/FeS2 cell positive electrode generally comprises at least 95 weight percent FeS2, desirably at least 99 weight percent FeS2, and preferably FeS2 is the sole active positive electrode material. Battery grade FeS2 having a purity level of at least 95 weight percent is available from American Minerals, Inc., Camden, N.J., USA; Chemetall GmbH, Vienna, Austria; Washington Mills, North Grafton, Mass.; and Kyanite Mining Corp., Dillwyn, Va., USA.
The pyrite or iron disulfide (FeS2) particles utilized in electrochemical cell cathodes are typically derived from natural ore which is crushed, heat treated, and milled. The fineness of the grind is limited by the reactivity of the particles with air and moisture. Large iron disulfide particles sizes can impact processes such as calendering, causing substrate distortion, coating to substrate bond disruption, as well as failures from separator damage. However, as the particle size is reduced, the surface area thereof is increased and is weathered. Weathering is an oxidation process in which the iron disulfide reacts with moisture and air to form iron sulfates. The weathering process results in an increase in acidity and a reduction in electrochemical activity. Ultimately, the preferred particle size for pyrite particles is between 1 and 30 μm, and more preferably between 1.5 and 15 μm and most preferably between 2-6 μm.
The average particle size of the FeS2 is preferably predetermined and created by a wet milling method such as a media mill, or a dry milling method using a non-mechanical milling device such as a jet mill. Electrochemical cells prepared with the reduced average particle size FeS2 particles exhibit increased cell voltage at any given depth of discharge, irrespective of cell size. The smaller FeS2 particles also make possible thinner coatings of positive electrode material on the current collector; for example, coatings of less than 10 μm can still be used. Preferred FeS2 materials and methods for preparing the same are disclosed in United States Patent Publication Nos. 20050233214A1) and 20050277023A1, both fully incorporated herein by reference.
In addition to the active material, the positive electrode mixture contains other materials. A binder is generally used to hold the particulate materials together and adhere the mixture to the current collector. One or more conductive materials such as metal, graphite and carbon black powders may be added to provide improved electrical conductivity to the mixture. The amount of conductive material used can be dependent upon factors such as the electrical conductivity of the active material and binder, the thickness of the mixture on the current collector and the current collector design. Small amounts of various additives may also be used to enhance positive electrode manufacturing and cell performance. The following are examples of active material mixture materials for Li/FeS2 cell positive electrodes. Graphite: KS-6 and TIMREX® MX15 grades synthetic graphite from Timcal America, Westlake, Ohio, USA. Carbon black: Grade C55 acetylene black from Chevron Phillips Company LP, Houston, Tex., USA or Grade SN2AYS acetylene black from Soltex of Houston, Tex., USA. Binder: ethylene/propylene copolymer (PEPP) made by Polymont Plastics Corp. (formerly Polysar, Inc.) and available from Harwick Standard Distribution Corp., Akron, Ohio, USA; non-ionic water soluble polyethylene oxide (PEO): POLYOX® from Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich., USA; and G1651 grade styrene-ethylene/butylenes-styrene (SEBS) block copolymer from Kraton Polymers, Houston, Tex. Additives: FLUO HT® micronized polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) manufactured by Micro Powders Inc., Tarrytown, N.Y., USA (commercially available from Dar-Tech Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA) and AEROSIL® grade fumed silica from Degussa Corporation Pigment Group, Ridgefield, N.J.
A preferred method of making FeS2 positive electrodes is to roll coat a slurry of active material mixture materials in a highly volatile organic solvent (e.g., trichloroethylene) onto both sides of a sheet of aluminum foil, dry the coating to remove the solvent, calender the coated foil to compact the coating, slit the coated foil to the desired width and cut strips of the slit positive electrode material to the desired length. It is desirable to use positive electrode materials with small particle sizes to minimize the risk of puncturing the separator. For example, FeS2 is preferably sieved through a 230 mesh (63 μm) screen before use. Coating thicknesses of 100 μm and less are common.
a through 5d, inclusive, depict the coating patterns that help to characterize the preferred embodiments of the invention. In each instance, the FeS2 and associated binding materials (all discussed above) are only selectively deposited on portions of one or both sides of the aluminum foil. For example,
With reference to
Notably, interfacial side 2S has electrochemically active material coated along its entire length in the direction of line A-A, as shown by coated region 252.
b illustrates a top view of interfacial side 1S. Here, it can be clearly seen that uncoated region 261 extends along the width, or more preferably the longitudinal axis of the jellyroll when the foil carrier 250 is spirally wound or most preferably (and as shown in the figures) the longitudinal edge, of the foil carrier 250. Optionally, in lieu of a current collector and as is known in the prior art, axially uncoated edge 270 may be provided on both interfacial sides 1S and 2S to establish electrical connectivity to the container or the cell closure assembly when electrode 218 is spirally wound with a separator and a negative electrode.
c shows a radial cross section of the resulting jellyroll electrode 219 along line A-A when positive electrode 218 is spirally wound as described above with negative electrode 220 and a separator (not shown but disposed along all interfacial contact points between positive electrode 218 and negative electrode 220). Notably, uncoated region 261 is disposed along the outermost circumference of jellyroll electrode assembly 219, resulting in the benefits and improvements described throughout herein. Negative electrode 220 may be wound to extend partially along the outermost circumference (shown in the figure) so that an anode tab (not shown in
Another embodiment is illustrated in
b then illustrates a top view of interfacial side 1S and corresponding
d shows the radial cross section of the resulting jellyroll electrode 319 along line A-A when positive electrode 318 is spirally wound as described above with negative electrode 320 and a separator (not shown but disposed along all interfacial contact points between positive electrode 318 and negative electrode 320). Notably, uncoated region 361 is disposed along the outermost circumference of jellyroll electrode assembly 319, while uncoated region 362 is positioned on the innermost core of the jellyroll 319. The negative electrode 320 again preferably extends partially along the outermost circumference to provide a longitudinal axis along the jellyroll 319 where the anode tab (not shown) may be safely and securely placed. As above, the resulting cell has improved service with reduced lithium inputs, all described in greater detail below.
A third embodiment is illustrated in
b illustrates a top view of interfacial side 1S and corresponding
d shows the radial cross section of the resulting jellyroll electrode 419 along line A-A when positive electrode 418 is spirally wound as described above with negative electrode 420 and a separator (not shown but disposed along all interfacial contact points between positive electrode 418 and negative electrode 420). Notably, uncoated region 461 is disposed along the outermost circumference of jellyroll electrode assembly 419, while uncoated region 462 is positioned on the innermost core of the jellyroll 419. Region 461b is also located on the innermost leading edge of jellyroll 419, for the reasons stated above. The negative electrode 420 again preferably extends partially along the outermost circumference to provide a longitudinal axis along the jellyroll 419 where the anode tab (not shown) may be safely and securely placed. As above, the resulting cell has improved service with reduced lithium inputs, all described in greater detail below.
A fourth embodiment is illustrated in
b illustrates a top view of interfacial side 1S and corresponding
d shows the radial cross section of the resulting jellyroll electrode 519 along line A-A when positive electrode 518 is spirally wound as described above with negative electrode 520 and a separator (not shown but disposed along all interfacial contact points between positive electrode 518 and negative electrode 520). Notably, uncoated region 561a is disposed along the outermost circumference of jellyroll electrode assembly 519, while uncoated region 562a is positioned on the innermost core of the jellyroll 519. Region 561b is also located on the innermost leading edge of jellyroll 519, and region 562b is near the outer-most wind, although not located on the outer circumference thereof. The negative electrode 520 again preferably extends partially along the outermost circumference to provide a longitudinal axis along the jellyroll 519 where the anode tab (not shown) may be safely and securely placed. As above, the resulting cell has improved service with reduced lithium inputs, all described in greater detail below.
a and 6b show an alternative coating pattern that could be implemented in any one of the embodiments described herein. With reference to
Generally speaking, all of the aforementioned configurations eliminate the need to provide any electrochemically active material around the outermost wind of the jellyroll electrode. This feature is even more significant, as the most prevalent design of prior art cells not only required electrochemically active material, but provided it in the form of negative electrode lithium which is expensive and difficult to handle. Thus, the lithium inputs for a cell of the present invention are reduced, while numerous, unexpected improvements are observed in terms of performance, as discussed in greater detail below.
Moreover, it should be noted that the uncoated regions described above do not need to extend along the entire longitudinal length of the jellyroll. However, the fullest benefits of the invention are realized according to the embodiments described above.
To the extent that uncoated regions are directly proximate one another on opposite sides of the width-wise edge of the foil, this uncoated portion may allow for a simplified jellyroll winding procedure. Here, the uncoated regions are oriented within the winding mandrel, separator and negative electrode material are provided in a layered fashion and the jellyroll electrode assembly is then wound. Because the uncoated foil is primarily oriented within the winding mandrel, this winding procedure will result in the uncoated regions forming a non-collapsing core for the jellyroll, as seen in
Such a non-collapsing core eliminates the need to utilize more expensive separator or negative electrode materials in the start of the winding process, thereby resulting in a cost savings to the manufacturer. At the same time, the uncoated width-wise edge provided in the winding mandrel should not comprise so much fully uncoated material (i.e., uncoated regions located proximate one another on opposite sides of the substrate) so as to collapse in upon itself or to otherwise compact upon release from the mandrel so as to form a solid axial core along the longitudinal axis of the jellyroll. Or stated differently, the resulting jellyroll electrode assembly should not be wound so tightly and with so much uncoated width-wise. Preferably, this means that the uncoated portion should not extend for more than one full winding revolution of the mandrel.
Turning the remaining features of the cell 110, an insulating cone 146 (shown in
Electrolytes for lithium cells, and particularly for lithium iron disulfide cells, are non-aqueous electrolytes containing water only in very small quantities as a contaminant (e.g., no more than about 500 parts per million by weight, depending on the electrolyte salt being used). Any nonaqueous electrolyte suitable for use with lithium and active positive electrode material may be used. The electrolyte contains one or more electrolyte salts dissolved in an organic solvent. Suitable salts depend on the anode and cathode active materials and the desired cell performance, but examples include lithium bromide, lithium perchlorate, lithium hexafluorophosphate, potassium hexafluorophosphate, lithium hexafluoroarsonate, lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate and lithium iodide. Suitable organic solvents include one or more of the following: dimethyl carbonate; diethyl carbonate; dipropyl carbonate; methylethyl carbonate; ethylene carbonate; propylene carbonate; 1,2-butylene carbonate; 2,3-butylene carbonate; methaformate; gamma-butyrolactone; sulfolane; acetonitrile; 3,5-dimethylisoxazole; n,n-dimethylformamide; and ethers. The salt and solvent combination should provide sufficient electrolytic and electrical conductivity to meet the cell discharge requirements over the desired temperature range. When ethers are used in the solvent they provide generally low viscosity, good wetting capability, good low temperature discharge performance and high rate discharge performance. Suitable ethers include, but are not limited to, acyclic ethers such as 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME); 1,2-diethoxyethane; di(methoxyethyl)ether; triglyme, tetraglyme and diethylether; cyclic ethers such as 1,3-dioxolane (DIOX), tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran and 3-methyl-2-oxazolidinone; and mixtures thereof. Usage of additional cosolvents, either listed above or known to those in the art, is also possible.
With respect to the Li/FeS2 in particular, examples of suitable salts include lithium bromide, lithium perchlorate, lithium hexafluorophosphate, potassium hexafluorophosphate, lithium hexafluoroarsenate, lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate and lithium iodide; and suitable organic solvents include one or more of the following: dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, methylethyl carbonate, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, 1,2-butylene carbonate, 2,3-butylene carbonate, methyl formate, γ-butyrolactone, sulfolane, acetonitrile, 3,5-dimethylisoxazole, n,n-dimethyl formamide and ethers. The salt/solvent combination must provide sufficient electrolytic and electrical conductivity to meet the cell discharge requirements over the desired temperature range. Ethers are often desirable because of their generally low viscosity, good wetting capability, good low temperature discharge performance and good high rate discharge performance. This is particularly true in Li/FeS2 cells because the ethers are more stable than with MnO2 positive electrodes, so higher ether levels can be used. Suitable ethers include, but are not limited to acyclic ethers such as 1,2-dimethoxyethane, 1,2-diethoxyethane, di(methoxyethyl) ether, triglyme, tetraglyme and diethyl ether; and cyclic ethers such as 1,3-dioxolane, tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran and 3-methyl-2-oxazolidinone.
The molar concentration of the electrolyte salt can be varied to modify the conductive properties of the electrolyte. Examples of suitable nonaqueous electrolytes containing one or more electrolyte salts dissolved in an organic solvent include, but are not limited to, a 1 mole per liter solvent concentration of lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (14.60% by weight) in a solvent blend of 1,3-dioxolane, 1,2-diethoxyethane, and 3,5-dimethyl isoxazole (24.80:60.40:0.20% by weight) which has a conductivity of 2.5 mS/cm; a 1.5 moles per liter solvent concentration of lithium trifluoro-methanesulfonate (20.40% by weight) in a solvent blend of 1,3-dioxolane, 1,2-diethoxy-ethane, and 3,5-dimethylisoxazole (23.10:56.30:0.20% by weight) which has a conductivity of 3.46 mS/cm; and a 0.75 mole per liter solvent concentration of lithium iodide (9.10% by weight) in a solvent blend of 1,3-dioxolane, 1,2-diethoxyethane, and 3,5-dimethylisoxazole (63.10:27.60:0.20% by weight) which has a conductivity of 7.02 mS/cm. Electrolytes utilized in the electrochemical cells of the present invention should have conductivity generally greater than about 2.0 mS/cm, desirably greater than about 2.5 or about 3.0 mS/cm, and preferably greater than about 4, about 6, or about 7 mS/cm.
Suitable separator materials are ion-permeable and electrically non-conductive. Examples of suitable separators include microporous membranes made from materials such as polypropylene, polyethylene and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. A suitable separator material for Li/FeS2 cells is available as CELGARD® 2400 microporous polypropylene membrane from Celgard Inc., of Charlotte, N.C., USA; Setella F20DHI microporous polyethylene membrane available from Exxon Mobil Chemical Company of Macedonia, N.Y., USA; and Teklon Gold LP microporous polyethylene membrane from Entek International LLC of Lebanon, Oreg., USA.
The separator is a thin microporous membrane that is ion-permeable and electrically nonconductive. It is capable of holding at least some electrolyte within the pores of the separator. The separator is disposed between adjacent surfaces of the anode and cathode to electrically insulate the electrodes from each other. Portions of the separator may also insulate other components in electrical contact with the cell terminals to prevent internal short circuits. Edges of the separator often extend beyond the edges of at least one electrode to insure that the anode and cathode do not make electrical contact even if they are not perfectly aligned with each other. However, it is desirable to minimize the amount of separator extending beyond the electrodes.
Additionally, to the extent the cell is designed to be container-negative, a layer of separator will be disposed between the jellyroll configuration and the sidewall of the housing/container so as to provide appropriate electrical insulation, while an anode collector tab attached to the lithium electrode and extending outside of the jellyroll (either on the longitudinal sides or at the bottom) insures sufficient negative electrical connection with the container. Additional separator or insulating material may be needed, as mentioned above, to insure no shorting occurs along any patterned (i.e., uncoated) length of positive electrode.
To provide good high power discharge performance it is desirable that the separator have the characteristics similar to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,290,414, hereby incorporated by reference. Suitable separator materials should also be strong enough to withstand cell manufacturing processes as well as pressure that may be exerted on the separator during cell discharge without tears, splits, holes or other gaps developing that could result in an internal short circuit. Additional suitable separator materials are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20050112462A1, and its progeny, all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
To minimize the total separator volume in the cell, the separator should be as thin as possible, but at least about 1 μm or more so a physical barrier is present between the cathode and anode to prevent internal short circuits. That said, the separator thickness ranges from about 1 to about 50 μm, desirably from about 5 to about 25 μm, and preferably from about 10 to about 16 or about 20 μm. The required thickness will depend in part on the strength of the separator material and the magnitude and location of forces that may be exerted on the separator where it provides electrical insulation.
Separator membranes for use in lithium batteries are often made of polypropylene, polyethylene or ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene, with polyethylene being preferred. The separator can be a single layer of biaxially oriented microporous membrane, or two or more layers can be laminated together to provide the desired tensile strengths in orthogonal directions. A single layer is preferred to minimize the cost. Suitable single layer biaxially oriented polyethylene microporous separators are identified above, each having preferred thickness between 16-20 μm.
The cell can be closed and sealed using any suitable process. Such processes may include, but are not limited to, crimping, redrawing, colleting and combinations thereof. For example, for the cell in
A first set of cells were constructed using standard “AA” sized cans and the most preferred materials identified above. In particular, the negative electrode having a thickness of 150 μm (about 6 mils), width of 39 mm and a length of 305.1 mm was provided. The positive electrode had the most preferred FeS2 mix deposited to a thickness of about 80 μm (3 mils) on either side of an aluminum foil. The final positive electrode had a width of 46.7 mm, including a 3.0 mm width uncoated axial edge, and a length of 328.7 mm, including an uncoated region having a length of 31.0 mm at the terminal longitudinal edge of only one interfacial side of the positive electrode (the second interfacial side being coated along its entire length, but again with the 3.0 mm uncoated axial edge). The two electrodes were spirally wound with a 404.2 length of the preferred separator and sealed along with the preferred electrolyte in a standard AA sized container according to the procedures described above.
A second set of cells were constructed using standard “AAA” sized cans and the most preferred materials identified above. In particular, the negative electrode having a thickness of 150 μm (about 6 mils), width of 34.2 mm and a length of 149.2 mm was provided. The positive electrode had the most preferred FeS2 mix deposited to a thickness of about 80 μm (3 mils) on either side of an aluminum foil. The final positive electrode had a width of 42.9 mm, including a 3.0 mm width uncoated axial edge, and a length of 167.1 mm, including an uncoated region having a length of 20.8 mm at the terminal longitudinal edge of only one interfacial side of the positive electrode (the second interfacial side being coated along its entire length, but again with the 3.0 mm uncoated axial edge). The two electrodes were spirally wound with a 243.4 mm length of the most preferred separator and sealed along with the preferred electrolyte in a standard AAA sized container according to the procedures described above.
A set of AA sized (FR6) cells were constructed, again according to the principles described above and using the most preferred materials, along with a control. In this instance, the amount of alloyed lithium present in the control cell was 1.000 g, whereas the alloyed lithium in the experimental cells was varied as shown in Table 1b below. The lithium in the experimental cells was reduced by reducing the negative electrode length and reducing the positive electrode length accordingly to ensure the positive electrode did not overlap the negative electrode tab.
By providing an electrochemical cell with an electrode assembly as specified above, the quantity of lithium, can be reduced as compared to previously known cell designs, while at the same time increasing lithium utilization and unexpectedly increasing cell capacity. Notably, even if a fully coated, double-sided positive electrode were provided on the outermost circumference in place of lithium, the unreacted FeS2 would still occupy internal volume, which is at a premium for smaller standard cell sizes, and would probably increase the potential for electrical shorting, as both the particulate nature of pyrite and its extraordinary propensity to expand upon discharge makes any such design more prone to shorting by way of puncture of the insulating material (e.g., separator) between the jellyroll and the negative container. In this regard, it should also be noted that the inventors believe U.S. Ser. No. 11/493,314, from which the present application claims priority, represents the first instance in which a lithium-iron disulfide cell is described with a positive-container polarity. Tables 1a and 1b below shows the potential reduction in lithium inputs possible according to the invention. Table 2 highlights the dimensional differences in the electrodes for control cells created for comparative purposes to both Examples I and II. Note that the control cells, as referred to throughout this specification, were constructed from the same materials and according to the same procedures as those of Examples I and II. It should understood that with respect to dimensional differences shown in Tables 1a and 2, these differences are directly attributable to the fact that in the control cells lithium must be provided along the outermost circumference (as is known in the art and noted above).
At least 5 cells each from Example I and from the control cells were then tested for service life under various conditions as shown in Tables 3a and 3b below. Similarly, Table 4 illustrates the service improvements achieved as a function of lithium reduction in the cell. As used throughout, “Cont.” stands for a continuous drain test at the specified power or current. “1.5/0.65 W DSC” contemplates a test in which the cell is exposed to a 1.5 W pulse for 2 s followed by a 0.65 W pulse for 28 s, which is repeated 10 times per hour. “1.2/0.65 W DSC” contemplates a test in which the cell is exposed to a 1.2 W pulse for 2 s followed by a 0.65 W pulse for 28 s, which is repeated 10 times per hour. All tests, as shown in Tables 3a, 3b and 4, were conducted at room temperature.
Clearly, cells of the present invention, irrespective of size, demonstrate improved performance despite the fact they contain almost 7% less lithium than the corresponding control cell. This result was unexpected and seemingly counter-intuitive, as the generally accepted teaching in the art is that more-and NOT less-electrochemically active materials in the cell should result in improved service. Also, the improved service is observed across all tests, irrespective of low or high drain and irrespective of power requirements.
One proposed theory for these observed benefits may be because the lithium on the outer wrap of the spirally wound electrode of the prior art (where lithium is provided on the outermost circumference) is only consumed or discharged from one side, thereby leaving unreacted lithium, whereas the current design is more efficient in that substantially all of the lithium may be reacted (except in the case where the lithium extends to the outermost circumference of the jellyroll in order to permit affixation of the anode tab along this outermost circumference).
It will be understood by those who practice the invention and those skilled in the art that various modifications and improvements may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit of the disclosed concepts. The scope of protection afforded is to be determined by the claims and by the breadth of interpretation allowed by law.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11493314 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 11581992 | US |