Lithium, nickel, manganese mixed oxide compound and electrode comprising the same

Abstract
A compound of the general formula: (i) wherein x has a value greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.4. The compound is also formulated into a positive electrode for use in an electrochemical cell.
Description
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2018/053660, filed Dec. 18, 2018, which claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 1721172.3, filed Dec. 18, 2017, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present invention relates to a set of electroactive cathode compounds. More specifically the present invention relates to a set of high capacity lithium-rich NM compounds.


BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

Conventional lithium ion batteries are limited in performance by the capacity of the material used to make the positive electrode (cathode). Lithium rich blends of cathode materials containing blends of nickel manganese cobalt oxide offer a trade-off between safety and energy density. It is understood that charge is stored in the transition metal cations within such cathode materials. It has been suggested that the capacity, and therefore energy density, of cathode materials could be significantly increased if charge could be stored on anions (for example oxygen) reducing the need for such high amounts of heavy transition metal ions. However, a challenge remains to provide a material that can rely on the redox chemistries of both the anions and cations to store charge, and withstand charge/discharge cycles without compromising the safety of the material, or causing undesired redox reactions which would break down the material.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In a first aspect, the present invention provides a compound of the general formula:







Li

(


4
3

-


2

x

3


)




Ni
x



Mn

(


2
3

-

x
3


)




O
2






wherein x has a value greater than 0.06 and less equal to or less than 0.4.


It has been found that a compound with an improved capacity can be achieved by reducing the amount of excess lithium and increasing the amount of nickel. The particular compound as defined above exhibits a significantly large increase in capacity due to the degree of oxidation of nickel and also the oxidation of the oxide ions within the lattice. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is understood that the presence of a particular amount of nickel substitution enables oxygen redox activity and thereby improves the electrochemical capacity of the material.


In addition, the compounds of the present invention exhibit improved stability during electrochemical cycling when compared to the transition metal substituted NMC lithium rich materials of the prior art. The evolution of molecular oxygen is ubiquitous with third row lithium-rich materials transition metal oxides where lithium has been exchanged for some of the transition metal ions (Li1+xM1−xO2, where M is Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu or Zn). These materials generally rely on oxygen redox to improve their charge capacity properties. Homogenous materials can suffer from molecular oxygen escaping from the crystal structure during cycling due to redox of the oxide anion. In turn, this reduces the capacity and useful lifetime of the material. However, the material of the present invention has improved capacity which is maintained over numerous cycles.


It is understood that when the charge imbalance caused by the removal of a lithium ion is balanced by the removal of an electron from the oxygen anion the resulting oxygen anion is unstable which results in undesired redox reactions and the evolution of molecular oxygen gas during charge cycling. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is understood that the specific nickel content in the material relative to the lithium content avoids under-bonding within the lattice such that each oxygen anion is still bonded to ˜3 cations. A potential solution to this problem might be to encapsulate the cathode layer or part of the cell in a gas impermeable membrane. However, this would add parasitic mass to the cell, thereby reducing the energy density of the resulting battery. However, the chemical approach of the present invention tunes the structure of the lattice using specific amounts of transition metals reduces the generation of oxygen gas from the material without the need to add layers to the cathode material or resulting battery cell.


In examples, x (i.e. the nickel content) is equal to or greater than 0.12. x may be equal to or greater than 0.2. It has been demonstrated that capacity of the material is significantly improved when x is equal to or is greater than 0.12, and is further improve when the value of x is equal to 0.2. In addition x may be equal to or less than 0.4. It is understood that the capacity of the material declines to expected levels above this threshold value of 0.4. It has been demonstrated that improved capacity is achieved when x is 0.3. More specifically, the value of x could be said to be greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.4. More specifically, the value of x could be said to be equal to or greater than 0.12 and equal to or less than 0.4. Materials within this broad range show an improved capacity. In further examples of improved materials within this broad range, the value of x may be greater than 0.06 and equal to or less than 0.12.


In further examples, the range of x may be a greater than 0.2. It has been demonstrated that material with a stoichiometric nickel content of above 0.2 has the surprising benefit of reducing the amount of molecular oxygen gas evolved during a charge/discharge cycle as well as having an improved charge capacity. More particularly, this range may be defined as x being greater than 0.2 and equal to or less than 0.4. Even more particularly this range could be defined as x being equal to or greater than 0.3 equal to or less than 0.4. Most particularly, x has a value of either 0.3 or 0.4.


The compound may be defined as having a layered structure. Typically layered structures have been shown to have the highest energy density. When in the layered form, the material can be further defined using the general formula aLi2MnO3. (1−a)LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 such that a may be less than 0.88, a may also be equal to or greater than 0.2. More particularly, a is equal or greater than 0.2 and less than 0.88. Even more particularly, a is equal or greater than 0.2 and equal to or less than 0.76. Specifically the material may be 0.4Li2MnO3.0.6LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2, or the material may be 0.2Li2MnO3.0.8LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2. These particular layered structures exhibit improved capacity and a higher degree of stability during a charge/discharge cycle. More specifically, the amount of gas evolved from the layered material during a charge/discharge cycle is reduced.


In a second aspect, the present invention provides an electrode comprising the compound of the first aspect. The electrode may comprise 3 fractions. The first is the compound of the present invention as previously described (in a variety of mass percentages from 60-98%, however, typically 70, 75, 80, 90 and 95%). The second fraction of the electrode comprises electroactive additives such as carbon, for example, Super P® and Carbon black, which comprises 60-80% of the mass fraction remaining excluding the first fraction. The third fraction is typically a polymeric binder such as PVDF, PTFE, NaCMC and NaAlginate. In some case additional fractions may be included and the overall percentages may change. The overall electrochemical performance of the cathode material can be improved by the introduction of electroactive additives, and the structural properties of the resulting cathode can also be improved by adding material that improves cohesion of the cathode material and adhesion of the material to particular substrates.


In a third aspect, the present invention provides an electrochemical cell comprising a positive electrode according to the description above, an electrolyte and a negative electrode (anode).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying Figures, in which:



FIG. 1 shows powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesised materials in accordance with Example 1 compared with the calculated patterns of the C12/m and R-3m symmetry lattice shown at the bottom and top of the figure respectively;



FIG. 2 shows 6Li MAS-NMR spectra collected on synthesised materials in accordance with Example 1. The spectra are presented in a stacked fashion with increasing nickel doping going from bottom up;



FIG. 3 shows first cycle galvanostatic load curves for the synthesised materials in accordance with Example 1; and



FIGS. 4A-4C show OEMS analysis of a set of the synthesised materials in accordance with Example 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following examples.


Example 1—Synthesis of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

The Formaldehyde-Resorcinol sol gel synthetic route was employed to synthesise materials with general formula







Li

(


4
3

-


2

x

3


)




Ni
x



Mn

(


2
3

-

x
3


)




O
2






with x=0, 0.06, 0.12, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 all the reagents ratios were calculated in order to obtain 0.01 mol of the final product.


Stoichiometric amounts of CH3COOLi·2H2O (98.0%, Sigma Aldrich®), (CH3COO)2Mn·4H2O (>99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) and (CH3COO)2Ni·4H2O (99.0% Sigma Aldrich® were dissolved in 50 mL of water with 0.25 mmol of CH3COOLi·2H2O (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) corresponding to 5% moles of lithium with respect to the 0.01 moles of synthesized material. At the same time 0.1 mol of resorcinol (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich®) was dissolved in 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (36.5% w/w solution in water, Fluka®). Once all the reagents were completely dissolved in their respective solvents, the two solutions were mixed and the mixture was vigorously stirred for one hour. The resulting solution, containing 5% molar excess of lithium, was subsequently heated in an oil bath at 80° C. until the formation of a homogeneous white gel.


The gel was finally dried at 90° C. overnight and then heat treated at 500° C. for 15 hours and 800° C. for 20 hours.


Example 2—Structural Analysis and Characterisation of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

The materials according to Example 1 were examined with the two techniques: Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) which was carried out utilising a Rigaku SmartLab® equipped with a 9 kW Cu rotating anode; and MAS-NMR spectra were collected on the materials with a Bruker Avance III 400WD magnet.



FIG. 1 shows in the right panel: Powder X-ray Diffraction patterns of the synthesised materials compared with the calculated patterns of the C12/m and R-3m symmetry lattice shown at the bottom and top of the figure respectively. On the left-hand side the structures for the C12/m and R-3m are reported. It is possible to observe the presence of transition metal ordering around lithium in the transition metal layer for the structure with C12/m symmetry. The enlargement shows the details of the reflections associated with the cation ordering in the transition metal layer that is lost as the nickel content increases.


All of the patterns appear to show the major peaks consistent with a close-packed layered structure such as LiTMO2 with a R-3m space group. Additional peaks are observed in the range 20-30 2Theta degrees which cannot be assigned to the R-3m space group highlighted in the expanded cut out of the figure. The order derives from the atomic radii and charge density differences between Li+ (0.59 Å), Ni+2 (0.69 Å) and Mn4+ (0.83 Å) and appears the strongest in the structures of the low nickel doped oxides. In the Li2MnO3 end member the 2:1 ratio of Li:Mn allows for the formation of a perfect honeycomb and therefore has a near perfect fit to the C12/m spacegroup.


As Nickel is substituted into the material the long range in-layer ordering is progressively lost. This is mainly due to the substitution of 1 Mn+4 and 2 Li+ for 3 Ni+2 to maintain the charge balance. Since Ni+2 and Li+ have a similar atomic radius in comparison to Mn+4 the Ni+2 will preferentially occupy lithium sites. Since the differential scattering cross section for X-rays of nickel and manganese are very close the ordering of the ions becomes less easy to resolve with X-rays and the peaks in the 20-30 degree range are lost. No presence of extra-peaks due to impurities was observed.


MAS-NMR spectra were collected for the NMR-active isotope 6Li on the whole series of materials. The normalized spectra in FIG. 2 show the presence of two signals, centered at 1550 and 780 ppm, corresponding to the two sites for lithium ions in the structure. The resonance centred at 1550 ppm is attributed to lithium belonging to [LiMn6] and [LiMn5Ni]/[LiMn5Li] configurations, within the transition metal layer. On the other hand, the resonance at 780 ppm is due to lithium in the lithium layer.


A progressive loss of sharpness can be observed as the nickel content is increased although the chemical shift (i.e. the peaks positions) remains the same for all the materials. This result could be explained through two main phenomena: the generation of new local environments for lithium as nickel is progressively substituted to lithium and manganese in the lattice; and/or a higher concentration of stacking faults in the materials with high nickel content. In both cases the long-range order is broken leading to a progressive broadening of the NMR resonances.


Example 3—Electrochemical Analysis of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

The materials according to Example 1 were characterised electrochemically through galvanostatic cycling performed with a BioLogic VMP3 and a Maccor 4600 series potentiostats. All the samples were assembled into stainless steel coincells against metallic lithium and cycled between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li+/Li for 100 cycles at a current rate of 50 mAg-1. The electrolyte employed was LP30 (a 1M solution of LiPF6 in 1:1 w/w ratio of EC:DMC).



FIG. 3 shows the potential curves during the charge and subsequent discharge of the first cycle for each material according to Example 1. All the samples present a high voltage plateau of different lengths centred on 4.5 V vs. Li+/Li0, whereas the presence of a sloped region at the beginning of the charge progressively increases in length with the amount of nickel doping. The extension of this region may be attributed to the oxidation of nickel from Ni+2 toward Ni+4. appears to be in good agreement with the amount of lithium (i.e. charge) that would be extracted accounting for solely the nickel redox activity. Hence, as expected, Li2MnO3 does not show any pre-plateau region whilst the







Li

(


4
3

-


2

x

3


)




Ni
x



Mn

(


2
3

-

x
3


)




O
2






x=0.3 doped oxide presents more than 150 mAhg−1.


During the first discharge, none of the materials show the presence of a reversible plateau, indicating a difference in the thermodynamic pathways followed during the extraction (charge) and insertion (discharge) of lithium ions from/in the lattice of each sample.


For all the material according to Example 1 the first cycle presents the lowest coulombic efficiency value due to the presence of the high potential plateau which is not reversible. The coulombic efficiencies appear to quickly improve from the first cycle values, around 60-70%, to values higher than 98% within the first five cycles. However, with this regard Li2MnO3 and







Li

(


4
3

-


2

x

3


)




Ni
x



Mn

(


2
3

-

x
3


)




O
2






with x=0.06 are an exception, showing an initial loss in efficiency. When the nickel substitution increases such that x=0.12 a significant improvement in the electrochemical performance is seen, indicating that there is a change in the nature of the charge storage mechanism.


Example 4—Gas Evolution During the First Cycle of the Nickel Substituted Lithium Rich Materials

One pellet of each material according to Example 1 was assembled into a Swagelok® test cell specifically machined to carry out an Operando Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry (OEMS) measurement. The mass spectrometry measurement involved in the OEMS experiment was performed with a Thermo-Fisher quadrupolar mass spectrometer. OEMS was performed on the set of materials in order to get an insight on the origin of the extra-capacity that is observed during the first cycle.



FIG. 4A-4C shows OEMS analysis of the nickel doped







Li

(


4
3

-


2

x

3


)




Ni
x



Mn

(


2
3

-

x
3


)




O
2






for x=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4, respectively. Each graph shows the galvanostatic curve during the first two cycles (top lines in each graph), the oxygen trace, and the carbon dioxide trace for each material. The right y-axis represents the electrode potential while the left y-axis the gas release rate expressed as moles of gas per minute per mole of active material, both axis reported as function of lithium equivalents. Argon was used as carrier gas with a flux rate of 0.7 mL/min and the electrode was cycled against metallic lithium at a rate of 15 mAg−1 between 2 and 4.8 V vs. Li+/Li0 for all the materials. The electrolyte employed was a 1M solution of LiPF6 in propylene carbonate.


CO2 and O2 were the only gaseous species detected for all the samples and a clear trend appears from FIG. 4A-4C, with a progressively lower amount of gas released as the amount of dopant nickel increases.


CO2 is detected first in all cases, peaking at the beginning of the high potential plateau (around 4.5 V vs. Li+/Li0) region and progressively decreasing until the end of charge.


The amount of CO2 decreases in line with the increase in nickel in content but is never eliminated. On the other hand, molecular oxygen appears to be released in a spike-like fashion that reaches its maximum towards the end of charge for the materials of the present invention. In the case of the high Ni substitution where x=0.4 it has been shown that there is almost complete suppression of O2 and a strong reduction in the amount of detected CO2 (FIG. 4C). This result is suggestive of the important role played by nickel as in stabilizing the oxide structures at high potentials by reducing the oxygen loss process.

Claims
  • 1. An electrode comprising: a compound of the general formula:
  • 2. The electrode of claim 1, wherein the compound is a cathode material having a layered structure.
  • 3. The electrode of claim 2, wherein the layered structure is expressed as the general formula: aLi2MnO3·(1−a)LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 wherein a is 0.2.
  • 4. The electrode of claim 1, wherein the electroactive additive is selected from at least one of carbon or carbon black.
  • 5. The electrode of claim 1, wherein the polymeric binder is selected from at least one of PVDF, PTFE, NaCMC or NaAlginate.
  • 6. An electrochemical cell comprising a positive electrode of claim 1, an electrolyte, and a negative electrode.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1721172 Dec 2017 GB national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB2018/053660 12/18/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/122848 6/27/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (93)
Number Name Date Kind
3761500 Thomas Sep 1973 A
3993508 Erlichman Nov 1976 A
4047289 Wolff Sep 1977 A
4288381 Dozzi et al. Sep 1981 A
4299986 Cucinella Nov 1981 A
5136046 Park et al. Aug 1992 A
5250784 Muller et al. Oct 1993 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5718989 Aoki et al. Feb 1998 A
6616714 Gauthier et al. Sep 2003 B1
7754384 Patoux et al. Jul 2010 B2
8122250 Haverinen Feb 2012 B2
8153301 Jiang Apr 2012 B2
8546018 Kajiyama Oct 2013 B2
8722250 Park May 2014 B2
9293766 Liu et al. Mar 2016 B2
9325030 Zidan Apr 2016 B2
9525173 Kagei et al. Dec 2016 B2
9575025 Nakayama et al. Feb 2017 B2
9593024 Thackeray Mar 2017 B2
9692084 Yang et al. Jun 2017 B2
9755272 Gaben Sep 2017 B2
9768450 Song et al. Sep 2017 B2
9843041 Lopez Dec 2017 B2
9893376 Yang et al. Feb 2018 B2
9947916 Oda Apr 2018 B2
9960458 Weicker et al. May 2018 B2
9997774 Hiratsuka Jun 2018 B2
10199649 Beck et al. Feb 2019 B2
10290869 Axelbaum May 2019 B2
10629902 Yu Apr 2020 B2
20020110733 Johnson Aug 2002 A1
20030129495 Yamato et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030162086 Longhi, Jr. et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040091779 Kang et al. May 2004 A1
20050014065 Jung et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050112466 Jordy et al. May 2005 A1
20060160261 Sheats Jul 2006 A1
20070238019 Laurent et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080263855 Li et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264478 Ahn et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090148764 Kwak et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100108939 Breger et al. May 2010 A1
20100233542 Endo et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248033 Kumar et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110126402 Kwak et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110129594 Kwak et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168944 Chang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110291043 Wilcox et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110294015 Pirk et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311883 Oukassi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120183855 Wohlfahrt-Mehrens et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120225199 Muthu et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120270114 Reynolds et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120312474 Kwak et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120321815 Song et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130040201 Manthiram Feb 2013 A1
20130160283 Wu Jun 2013 A1
20130260248 Seki et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130298387 Kobier et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140007418 Song et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140120397 Kim et al. May 2014 A1
20140154581 Kawasato et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140178748 Chernyshov et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140227609 Frey et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140242463 Song Aug 2014 A1
20140255603 Xiao et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150010822 Nakahara et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150010872 Schindler et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150050522 Manthiram et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150064558 Seki et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150102530 Wallace et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150180031 Thackeray et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150188186 Bedjaoui et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150280201 Bhardwaj Oct 2015 A1
20160164088 Peralta et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160164092 Stottlemyer Jun 2016 A1
20160218362 Kagei et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160218364 Sakai et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160254539 Kagei et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160294010 Herb et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160372783 Min et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170133678 Ozoemena et al. May 2017 A1
20190044182 Maeda et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190115627 Rendall Apr 2019 A1
20190334171 Ozoemena Oct 2019 A1
20200220221 Keyzer et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200280099 Keyzer et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200377376 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381718 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200381724 Roberts Dec 2020 A1
20200381725 Roberts Dec 2020 A1
20200381726 Roberts et al. Dec 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (72)
Number Date Country
2527207 Aug 2013 CA
1404635 Mar 2003 CN
1458706 Nov 2003 CN
1464573 Dec 2003 CN
101128941 Feb 2008 CN
101562245 Oct 2009 CN
101694876 Apr 2010 CN
101855770 Oct 2010 CN
102054986 May 2011 CN
102074700 May 2011 CN
102881873 Jan 2013 CN
103035900 Apr 2013 CN
103311513 Sep 2013 CN
103545519 Jan 2014 CN
103887562 Jun 2014 CN
105742607 Jul 2016 CN
105810934 Jul 2016 CN
103943844 Aug 2016 CN
106410186 Feb 2017 CN
104241633 Sep 2017 CN
4227720 Apr 1993 DE
1189296 Mar 2002 EP
2746288 Jun 2014 EP
2763219 Aug 2014 EP
2827430 Jan 2015 EP
3093272 Nov 2016 EP
1402544 Aug 1975 GB
2128604 May 1984 GB
45-035555 Nov 1970 JP
57-96472 Jun 1982 JP
S64-21870 Jan 1989 JP
H4-269721 Sep 1992 JP
09-237631 Sep 1997 JP
2000-149911 May 2000 JP
2002-343342 Nov 2002 JP
2003-226955 Aug 2003 JP
2005-044801 Feb 2005 JP
2005-100947 Apr 2005 JP
2005-150093 Jun 2005 JP
2005-150102 Jun 2005 JP
2006-294597 Oct 2006 JP
2007-503102 Feb 2007 JP
2009-182273 Aug 2009 JP
2009-246236 Oct 2009 JP
2009-544141 Dec 2009 JP
2010-251075 Nov 2010 JP
2011-108603 Jun 2011 JP
2013-506945 Feb 2013 JP
2014-146458 Aug 2014 JP
2014-529176 Oct 2014 JP
2014-531718 Nov 2014 JP
2017-521848 Aug 2017 JP
10-2014-0081468 Jul 2014 KR
10-2016-0091172 Aug 2016 KR
10-2017-0008540 Jan 2017 KR
10-2017-0025874 Mar 2017 KR
2009055529 Apr 2009 WO
2010036723 Apr 2010 WO
2011039132 Apr 2011 WO
2011052607 May 2011 WO
2012065767 May 2012 WO
2013021955 Feb 2013 WO
2013035519 Mar 2013 WO
2013118659 Aug 2013 WO
2013146723 Oct 2013 WO
2015007586 Jan 2015 WO
2015053357 Apr 2015 WO
2015107194 Jul 2015 WO
2016001884 Jan 2016 WO
2016210419 Dec 2016 WO
2017047280 Mar 2017 WO
2017087403 May 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (59)
Entry
Breger et al “High-resolution X-ray diffraction, DIFFaX, NMR and first principles study of disorder in the Li2MnO3—Li[Ni1/2Mn1/2]O2 solid solution”, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 178 (2005) 2575-2585.
Jiang et al “Electrochemical and structural study of the layered, “Li-excess” lithium-ion battery electrode material Li[Li1/9Ni1/3Mn5/9]O2”, Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2733-2745.
Park et al “Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2 compounds . . . ”, Journal of Power Sources 129 (2004) 288-295.
Lu et al “Synthesis, structure, and the electrochemical behavior of Li[NixLi1/3-2x/3Mn2/3-x/3]O2”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 149, (6) A778-A791.
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020552156 dated Sep. 7, 2021, 12 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document).
Notification of Reason(S) for Refusal received for Korean Application No. 10-2020-7018773, dated Sep. 23, 2021, 12 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552161, dated Sep. 7, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552159, dated Sep. 7, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018774, dated Sep. 23, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Birrozzi et al. (2016). “Beneficial effect of propane sultone and tris(trimethylsilyl) borate as electrolyte additives on the cycling stability of the lithium rich nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) oxide,” Journal of Power Sources 325:525-533.
Cucinella et al. (1982). “Calcium Alkoxyalanates I. Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 224(1): 1-12.
Hudson et al. (2007). “Studies on Synthesis and Dehydrogenation Behavior of Magnesium Alanate and Magnesium-Sodium Alanate Mixture,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32(18): 4933-4938.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2019, directed to International Application No. PCT/GB2018/053660; 13 pages.
Lu et al. (Apr. 2002). “Synthesis, Structure, and Electrochemical Behavior of Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 149(6): A778-A791.
Mehrotra et al. (Jan. 1978). “Preparation and Characterization of Some Volatile Double Isopropoxides of Aluminium with Alkaline Earth Metals,” Inorganica Chemica Acta 29:131-136.
Metz et al. (2002). “Weakly Coordinating A1-, Nb-, Ta-, Y-, and La-Based Perfluoroaryloxymetalate Anions as Cocatalyst Components for Single-Site Olefin Polymerization,” Organometallics 21(18): 3691-3702.
Park et al. (Apr. 2004). “Structural investigation and electrochemical behaviour of Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2 compounds by a simple combustion method,” Journal of Power Sources 129: 288-295.
Park et al. (May 2010). “Suppression of O2 evolution from oxide cathode for lithium-ion batteries: VOx-impregnated 0.5Li2MnO3—0.5LiNi0.4Co0.2Mn0.4O2 cathode,” Chemical Communications, 46(23): 4190-4192.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721172.3; 2 pages.
Thackeray et al. (Aug. 2006). “Comments on the structural complexity of lithium-rich Li1+xM1-xO2 electrodes (M +Mn, Ni, Co) for lithium batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications 8(9):1531-1538.
Turova et al. (1977). “Hydrolysis and Alcoholysis of Alkali Metal Aluminium Hydrides,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, 21: 157-161.
Wu et al. (Mar. 2006). “High Capacity, Surface-Modified Layered Li[Li(1-x)/3Mn(2-x)/3Nix/3Cox/3]O2 Cathodes with Low Irreversible Capacity Loss,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 9(5): A221-A224.
Yasushi et al. (Nov. 16, 1984) “CAS No. [32843-22-4] Aluminate(1-), tetrakis(diphenylaminato)-, magnesium,” (2 pages).
Meese-Marktscheffel et al., “Magnesium-aluminum alkoxides: the synthesis of Mg[Al(OR)4]2 (R=Busec and Ph), structure of (thf)2Mg[(μ-OPh)2Al (OPh))2]2, and dynamic NMR of Mg[Al(OBusec)4]2”, Polyhedron, 1994, vol. 13, No. 6-7, pp. 1045-1050.
Office Action received for Japanese Application No. 2020-515116, dated Oct. 12, 2021, 4 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 2 pages of Original Document).
Govil et al., “Some Double Ethoxides of Alkaline Earth Metals with Aluminium”, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry, vol. 5, No. 4, 1975, pp. 267-277.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052537, dated Dec. 19, 2018, 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/052538, dated Oct. 29, 2018, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053655, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053656, dated Feb. 15, 2019, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053657, dated Apr. 15, 2019, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053659, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB2018/053663, dated Sep. 15, 2019, 10 pages.
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552157, dated Jun. 21, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552160, dated Jul. 5, 2021, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7010108, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7010109, dated Jul. 28, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application 1721179.8; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721177.2; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721178.0; 2 pages.
Search Report dated Jun. 28, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1721180.6; 2 pages.
Search Report dated May 30, 2018, directed to GB Application No. 1714770.3; 2 pages.
Peretich, A.L., Amenta, D.S., Gilje, J.W. et al. “Crystal Structure of [Me2NCH(O)]2Mg[(Ij-OPri)2Al(OPri)2]2”. J Chem Crystallogr40, 716-719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10870-010-9783-x.
Lee et al., “High capacity Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O2 cathode materials via a carbonate co-precipitation method,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 162, No. 2, Sep. 12, 2006, pp. 1346-1350.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081264.0, dated Feb. 7, 2022, 19 pages (11 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081413.3, dated Mar. 15, 2022, 17 pages (10 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-552157, dated Jan. 25, 2022, 5 pages (2 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Original Document).
Park et al., “The Effects of Ni Doping on the Performance of O3-Lithium Manganese Oxide Material”, Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 21, No. 5, 2004, pp. 983-988.
Jiang et al., “Electrochemical and thermal studies of Li[NixLi(1/3-2x/3)Mn(2/3-x/3)]O2 (x=1/12, 1/4, 5/12, and 1/2)”, Electrochemica Acta, vol. 50, 2005, pp. 4778-4783.
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880081346.5, dated Jan. 27, 2022, 19 pages (11 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document).
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7018752, dated Nov. 16, 2021, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document).
Synthesis and performance studies of lithium-rich cathode materials Li[Li(1-x)/3Ni2x/3Mn(2-x)/3]O2 and Li[Li(1-x)/3NixMn(2-2x)/3]O2, Tiantian WU, China Master's Theses Full-text Database: Engineering Technology vol. II, No. 7.
Yang et al., “Porous 0.2Li2MnO3-0.8LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 nanorods as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries”, ESI for J. Mater. Chem. A, vol. 2, 2013, pp. 5.
Zhang et al., “Synthesis and electrochemistry of layered 0.6LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2⋅xLi2MnO3⋅yLiCoO2 (x+y=0.4) cathode materials”, Materials Letters, vol. 58, 2004, pp. 3197-3200.
Kim et al.; “Synthesis and electrochemical behavior of Li[Li0.1Ni0.35-x/2CoxMn0.55-x/2]O2 cathode materials”; Solid State Ionics 164, pp. 43-49. (Year: 2003).
Kim et al.; (“Electrochemical properties of Li[Li(1-x)/3CoxMn(2-2x)/3]O2 (0<x<1) solid solutions prepared by poly-vinyl alcohol method”; Electrochemistry Communications 9, pp. 103-108. (Year: 2007).
Sun et al.; “The preparation and electrochemical performance of solid solutions LiCoO2—Li2MnO3 as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries”; Electrochimica Acta 51, pp. 5581-5586. (Year: 2006).
Thackeray et al. “Li2MnO3-stabilized LiMO2 (M=Mn, Ni, Co) electrodes for lithium-ion batteries”; J. of Materials Chemistry, vol. 17, No. 30, pp. 3053-3272. (Year: 2007).
Xiang et al.; “Understanding the Influence of Composition and Synthesis Temperature on Oxygen Loss, Reversible Capacity, and Electrochemical Behavior of xLi2MnO3 (1-x)LiCoO2 Cathodes in the First Cycle”; J. Phys. Chem. 118, pp. 23553-23558. (Year: 2014).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200335786 A1 Oct 2020 US