This invention relates to the field of optical communications, and more particularly, to a reconfigurable optical add/drop system for use in optical multiplexing.
For several decades, fiber optics have been used for communication. Specifically, fiber optics are used for data transmission and other telecommunication applications. Despite the enormous information carrying capacity of fiber, as compared to conventional copper cable, the high cost of installing fiber optics presents a barrier to full implementation of fiber optics, particular as the “last mile”, from the central office to residences and businesses.
One method of increasing carrying capacity without incurring additional installation costs has been to multiplex multiple signals onto a single fiber using various methods, such as time division multiplexing, where two or more different signals are carried over the same fiber, each sharing a portion of time. Another, more preferred multiplexing method is wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), where two or more different wavelengths of light are simultaneously carried over a common fiber.
Until recently, typical fibers used for communications applications had preferred wavelength bands centered at 850 nm, 1300 nm, and 1550 nm, wherein each band typically had a useful bandwidth of approximately 10 to 40 nm depending on the application. Transmission within these bands was preferred by systems designers because of low optical attenuation. Recent advances in fiber design now provides fiber that have low attenuation over a very broad transmission range, from 1300 –620 nm.
Wavelength division multiplexing can separate a fiber's bandwidth into multiple channels. Dividing bandwidth into multiple discreet channels, such as 4, 8, 16, 40, or even as many as 160 channels, through a technique referred to as dense channel wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM), is a relatively lower cost method of substantially increasing telecommunication capacity, using existing fiber optic transmission lines. Techniques and devices are required, however, for multiplexing the different discreet carrier wavelengths. That is, the individual optical signals must be combined onto a common fiber-optic line or other optical waveguide and then later separated again into the individual signals or channels at the opposite end or other point along the fiber-optic cable. Thus, the ability to effectively combine and then separate individual wavelengths (or wavelength sub-ranges) is of growing importance to the fiber-optic telecommunications field and other fields employing optical instruments.
Optical multiplexers are known for use in spectroscopic analysis equipment and for the combination or separation of optical signals in wavelength division multiplexed fiber-optic telecommunications systems. Known devices for this purpose have employed, for example, diffraction gratings, prisms and various types of fixed or tunable filters.
Approaches for selectively removing or tapping a channel, i.e., selective wavelengths, from a main trunk line carrying multiple channels, i.e., carrying optical signals on a plurality of wavelengths or wavelength sub-ranges, is suggested, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,768,849 to Hicks, Jr. Hicks, shows filter taps, as well as the use of gangs of individual filter taps, each employing high performance, multi-cavity dielectric pass-band filters and lenses for sequentially removing a series of wavelength sub-ranges or channels from a main trunk line. The filter tap of Hicks, returns a multi-channel signal to the main trunk line as it passes the desired channel to a branch line. One known demux is disclosed in Pan et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,652,814, FIG. 25. In Pan et al., the WDM input signal is cascaded through individual filter assemblies, consisting of a fiber collimator, thin film filter, and a fiber focusing lens. Each filter is set for a given wavelength. However, aligning the fibers for each wavelength is costly and errors in the alignment contribute significantly to the system losses. Further, FIG. 13 of Pan et al. teaches the use of a dual fiber collimator, thin film filter, and a dual fiber focusing lens to selectively DROP and ADD a single wavelength or range of wavelengths. As discussed above, aligning the collimators is expensive.
Polarization dependent loss (PDL) is also a problem in WDM system because the polarization of the light drifts as it propagates through the fiber and furthermore this drift changes over time. Thus, if there is PDL in any component, the drifting polarization will change the signal level, which may degraded the system operation.
Other multiplexer devices may be employed to add or drop channels in WDM systems. These systems are commonly known as optical add/drop multiplexers, or OADM. Another OADM, disclosed by Mizrahi U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,023, employs fiber Bragg gratings to demux and mux signals in a WDM system. This method requires optical circulators and multiple components.
However, the multi channel OADM designs discussed above are not programmable by the end user. That is, each multiplexers is designed and manufactured to mux (add) specific channels; or when used in reverse each multiplexers is also designed and manufactured to demux (drop) specific channels. This limitation mandates that the optical system's parameters be fixed before installation. Changes are not possible without replacing the fixed optical multiplexers with different designed multiplexers. This is expensive.
One known programmable OADM is discussed in Boisset et al, International Publication No. WO01/13151. In Boisset et al., the desired add/drop channel is programmed by translating a segmented filter. To achieve this translation however, a large mechanical mechanism is employed. A further limitation to Boisset et al. is that only a single channel may be added or dropped per device. Designers may employ multiple devices, deployed in series, and programmed as necessary to add/drop the correct channel; however, this approach requires multiple devices and has multiple points of failure. Furthermore, the size of such a device would be overly large and therefore not practical for many applications where space is limited.
Two other programmable OADMs are disclosed by Tomlinson, U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,133, and Aksyuk, et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,946, both use bulk optics and gratings to demultiplex and multiplex WDM input and output signal. While OADM's disclosed by Tomlinson and Aksyuk are both programmable, neither provides for discrete adding or dropping of an individual optical signal in a multi signal system. To achieve discrete adding or dropping of an individual optical signal in a multi signal system using the systems disclosed in Tomlinson and Aksyuk, additional components are required. All the Add wavelengths must be multiplexed onto a single fiber before it is sent to the OADM. Likewise, a demultiplexer must be added to the Drop port to access the individual wavelength channels. The additional components require additional space, add attenuation, and add cost to the system.
It is an object of the present invention to provide improved optical multiplexing devices which reduce or wholly overcome some or all of the aforesaid difficulties inherent in prior known devices. Particular objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, that is, those who are knowledgeable and experienced in this field of technology, in view of the following disclosure of the invention and detailed description of certain preferred embodiments.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, a programmable Littrow grating based optical add/drop multiplexing device, programmed to add and/or drop one or more optical channels from/to a multi-channel light signal, comprises a focal plane, in combination with a lens in combination with a prism, a Littrow grating, and a plurality of programmable mirrors.
The focal plane further comprises an IN port for receiving a multi-channel optical signal, a PASS port for transmitting a multi-channel optical signal, a plurality of ADD ports for receiving a plurality of optical channels, a plurality of DROP ports for transmitting a plurality of optical channels, and a plurality of programmable mirrors for directing light channels.
The multi-channel light enters the device by way of the IN port and is directed through the Lens to the Littrow grating, where selected channels are dispersed and directed through the lens and focused onto to the plurality of programmable mirrors. The Littrow grating separates the multi-channel optical signal into its individual optical channels and directs the individual optical channels through the Prism, the Lens, and onto the programmable mirror that corresponds with that individual channel.
Depending upon the programmed state of the mirrors, the channels are either directed through the lens, prism, and Littrow grating (or another wavelength separating medium) which combine the channels into a multi-channel light signal and directs it out of the system by way of the prism, lens and pass port, or the channels are directed through the lens, and mirror so as to exit the system by way of the Lens and one of the plurality of drop ports.
In the instance where the programmed state of the mirrors directs one or more channels through one of the plurality of drop ports, one or more channels may enter the device by way of one of the plurality of add ports, and are directed through the lens, mirror, and lens, to the one of the plurality of programmable mirrors so as to exit the system by way of the lens, prism, and Littrow grating, which combines the channels into a multi-channel light signal and directs it out of the system by way of the prism, lens and pass port.
To reduce polarization dependent loss (PDL) in the system a quarter-wave plate (QWP) may also be employed between the Lens and Littrow grating. The QWP rotates the polarization so that light that is s-polarized on the first pass is p-polarized on the second pass and there is no net polarization dependent loss (PDL) for light traveling between the IN and PASS ports.
The Littrow grating based OADM of the invention has numerous applications, including use in fiber optic telecommunications systems. For purposes of illustration, the preferred embodiments described below in detail multiplexing and demultiplexing, and adding and dropping channels, in wavelength division multiplexing and demultiplexing for a multi-channel fiber optic telecommunication systems. Exemplary references to an optical channel, or simply to a channel, should be understood to mean an optical signal with a centered wavelength and an upper and lower wavelength. Channel spacing is measured from the center of the first channel to the center of an adjacent channel.
A three channel Littrow grating based OADM, employing one embodiment of the invention, is detailed in
A first embodiment of the programmable OADM device of
A Littrow grating is a grating that operates at or near Littrow. Littrow is a special, but common case, in which the light is diffracted off the grating back toward the direction from which it came (i.e., a=b); this is called the Littrow configuration, for which the grating equation becomes:
ml=2d sin(a)
where a is the incident angle, b is the diffracted angle, m is the grating order, l is the wavelength, and d is the grating groove spacing. In one embodiment, the grating is used near the Littrow condition, so the same lens can be used for collimating and focusing the light. Further, using the grating near the Littrow condition takes advantage of the high diffraction efficiency of the grating near the Littrow condition.
Lens 105 may be comprised of multiple lens elements 105a, 105b and 105c. It is well known in the art that a lenses may be comprised of multiple lens elements to achieve a particular optical prescription.
Prism 107 may optionally be used in any embodiment of the system. Temperature changes cause grating to expand and contract. As gratings expand and contract the wavelength-sized gradations that cause diffraction increase and decrease causing a change in the diffraction angle from a grating. Prism 107 may be used to minimize the thermal affects on Grating 109. When Prism 107 and Grating 109 are properly designed and configured the effects of temperature on the system are greatly reduced. However, some embodiments of the system do not contain Prism 107.
Quarter-wave plate (QWP) 103 may also be employed between the Lens and Littrow grating to reduce polarization dependent loss (PDL) in the system a. The QWP 103 rotates the polarization so that light that is s-polarized on the first pass is p-polarized on the second pass and there is no net polarization dependent loss (PDL) for light traveling between the IN and PASS ports.
The focal plane 200 of
Turning again to
Depending upon the programmed state of the Programmable Mirrors channels received via the IN port 201 are either passed via the PASS port 203 or dropped via one of the plurality of DROP ports 215, 225, or 235. In the event one or more channels received via the IN port 201 are passed via PASS port 203, the channel(s) are directed through the Lens 105, QWP 103, Prism 107, and Littrow grating 109 which multiplexes the channel with other passed and added channels into a multi-channel light signal 111 and directs it out of the system by way of the Prism 107, QWP 103, Lens 105 and PASS port 203.
In the event one of more channels received via the IN port 201 are dropped via one of the plurality of DROP ports 215, 225, or 235, the channel(s) are directed through the Lens 105, and mirror 117 so as to exit the system by way of the Lens 105 and one of the plurality of DROP ports 215, 225, or 235 corresponding to the channel. Because the mirrors may be programmed individually, it will be clear to one skilled in the art that any channel may be dropped or passed.
In the instance where one or more of the received via the IN port 201 are dropped via one of the plurality of DROP ports 215, 225, or 235, one or more channels corresponding channels may enter the device through one of the plurality of ADD ports 213, 223, or 233. These added channels enter the system by way of one of the plurality of ADD ports 213, 223, or 233, and are directed through the Lens 105, Lens 105, mirror 117, Lens 105, to the one of the plurality of Programmable Mirrors corresponding to the channel so as to exit the system by way of the Lens 105, QWP 103, Prism 107, and Littrow grating 109, which multiplexes the channel with other passed and added channels into a multi-channel light signal 111 and directs it out of the system by way of the Prism 107, QWP 103, Lens 105 and PASS port 203.
Turning to
By engaging the channel mirrors, one or more separate channels may be dynamically routed onto or off of a multi-channel light signal. Further, by engaging the channel mirrors as a function of time and in synchronous conjunction with other system components, time-division multiplexing of optical signals may be achieved.
One or more quarter-wave plates (QWP) may be employed in the system to reduce polarization dependent loss (PDL) in the system. The preferred location of the QWP is between Lens 105 and Grating 109. QWP may be positioned such that they are substantially normal to the propagating light beam and the retardance axis is at 45 degrees to the light that is polarized parallel and perpendicular to the grating graduations. Passage through the QWP converts the parallel and perpendicular polarized components of the light into right and left circularly polarized states. Reflection off the grating converts changes the handedness of the polarization: right circularly polarized light into left circularly polarized light and visa versa. Passage through the QWP the second time converts the light back to a linearly polarized state, but it's departing polarization state is orthogonal to the input state. Thus, during one pass through the system the light is parallel and on the next is perpendicular leaving a substantially zero PDL for the system.
Consider again the three channel system depicted in
An optical prescription for a three channel Littrow grating based OADM is provided in Table 2 in CODE V format. The numerical aperture of the lens is 0.17 to accommodate standard fiber and the grating has 600 lp/mm. The root mean square wavefront error is less than 0.03 waves in double pass over the temperature range of −20 to +70 degrees centigrade, when the mount is made of 416 Stainless Steel.
Turning next to
Turning next to
Having thus described exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the above disclosures are exemplary only and that various other alternatives, adaptations and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention being indicated by the claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/325,670 filed Sep. 28, 2001, 60/349,968 filed Jan. 18, 2002, 60/388,358 filed Jun. 12, 2002, and 60/397,944 filed Jul. 23, 2002, the discosures of which are incorporated fully herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4244045 | Nosu et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4482994 | Ishikawa | Nov 1984 | A |
4768849 | Hicks, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
4998793 | Henry et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5040169 | Guerin et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5048909 | Henry et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5414540 | Patel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5652814 | Pan et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5745271 | Ford et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5786915 | Scobey | Jul 1998 | A |
5822095 | Taga et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859717 | Scobey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5881199 | Li | Mar 1999 | A |
5912748 | Wu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943454 | Aksyuk et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960133 | Tomlinson | Sep 1999 | A |
6097859 | Solgaard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6185023 | Mizrahi | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198857 | Grasis et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204946 | Aksyuk et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208442 | Liu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212312 | Grann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6263134 | Laude | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275623 | Brophy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285500 | Ranalli et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285810 | Fincato et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289145 | Solgaard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6320996 | Scobey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327019 | Patel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351581 | Doerr et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6407839 | Cao | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434291 | Kessler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439728 | Copeland | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6498872 | Bouevitch et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501877 | Weverka et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535664 | Anderson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542657 | Anderson | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549699 | Belser et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560000 | Iyer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6560020 | Kramer | May 2003 | B1 |
6625346 | Wilde | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631222 | Wagener et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634810 | Ford et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636654 | McGuire, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6657770 | Marom et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678445 | Tomlinson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707959 | Ducellier et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6751415 | Fabiny | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785038 | Hichwa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798941 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7019885 | Michalicek | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010009596 | Solgaard et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010052980 | Tada | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020076146 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020131698 | Wilde | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020196493 | Marom | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196494 | McGuire, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196520 | Marom et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197000 | Marom | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012486 | Ducellier et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053749 | Weverka et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040130774 | Giles et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2342719 | Apr 2001 | CA |
1001287 | May 2000 | EP |
1298467 | Apr 2003 | EP |
WO 0107947 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0137021 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0146731 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0225358 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02079832 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030090762 A1 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60397944 | Jul 2002 | US | |
60388358 | Jun 2002 | US | |
60349963 | Jan 2002 | US | |
60325670 | Sep 2001 | US |