Live well heater cable

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6585046
  • Patent Number
    6,585,046
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 27, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 1, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of heating gas being produced in a well reduces condensate occurring in the well. A cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor is deployed into the well while the well is still live. Electrical power is applied to the conductor to cause heat to be generated. Gas is allowed up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead. The heat retards condensation, which creates frictional losses in the gas flow.
Description




FIELD OF INVENTION




This invention relates in general to wells that produce gas and condensate and in particular to a heater cable deployable while the well is live for raising the temperature of the gas being produced to reduce the amount of condensate.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Many gas wells produce liquids along with the gas. The liquid may be a hydrocarbon or water that condenses as the gas flows up the well. The liquid my be in the form of a vapor in the earth formation and lower portions of the well due to sufficiently high pressure and temperature. The pressure and the temperature normally drop as the gas flows up the well. When the gas reaches or nears its dew point, condensation occurs, resulting in liquid droplets. Liquid droplets in the gas stream cause a pressure drop due to frictional effects. A pressure drop results in a lower flow rate at the wellhead. The decrease in flow rate due to the condensation can cause significant drop in production if quantity and size of the droplets are large enough. A lower production rate causes a decrease in income from the well. In severe cases, a low production rate may cause the operator to abandon the well.




Applying heat to a well by the use of a downhole heater cable has been done for wells in permafrost regions and to other wells for various purposes. In one technique in permafrost regions, the production tubing is pulled out of the well and a heater cable is strapped onto the tubing as it is lowered back into the well. One difficulty with this technique in a gas well is that the well would have to be killed before pulling the tubing. This is performed by circulating a liquid through the tubing and tubing annulus that has a weight sufficient to create a hydrostatic pressure greater than the formation pressure. In low pressure gas wells, killing the well is risky in that the well may not readily start producing after the killing liquid is removed. The kill liquid may flow into the formation, blocking the return of gas flow.




Another problem associated within the use of heater cable is to avoid loss of the heat energy through the tubing annulus to the casing and earth formation. This lost heat is not available to increase the temperature of the produced gas and significantly increases heating costs. It is also known to thermally insulate at least portion s of the production tubing in various manner to retard heat loss.




SUMMARY




In this invention a method of heating gas being produced in a well is provided to reduce condensate occurring in the well. A cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor is coiled on a reel and transported to a well site. The cable assembly is deployed from the reel into the well while the well is still live. A pressure controller is preferably used at the upper end of the production tubing to install the cable while the well is live. Electrical power is supplied to the conductor to cause heat to be generated. Gas flows up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead.




Preferably, there is a plurality of conductors in the cable, and the lower ends are secured together. Also, preferably, the cable is contained within a coiled tubing. Heat transfer from the cable may be increased by providing a dielectric liquid in the tubing annulus, by drawing a vacuum in the tubing annulus, or by applying heat reflective coatings to the tubing and/or the casing. The cable may be divided into sections, with some of the sections providing more heat than others.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a well having a heater cable installed in accordance with this invention.





FIG. 1



a


is a partial sectional view of the production tubing of the well of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 2

is an enlarged side view of a portion of the heater cable of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is an enlarged side view of a lower portion of the heater cable of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

is a sectional view of the heater cable of

FIG. 3

, taken along the line


4





4


of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a graph of pressure versus depth for a well in which heater cable in accordance with this invention was installed.





FIG. 6

is a graph of temperature versus depth for a well in which heater cable in accordance with this invention was installed, measured after installation of a heater cable and with power on and off to the heater cable.





FIG. 7

is a sectional view of an alternate embodiment of a lower termination for the heater cable of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 8

is a sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the heater cable of the well of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 9

is a sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the heater cable shown in

FIG. 1

, shown prior to the outer coiled tubing being swaged.





FIG. 10

is a sectional view of the heater cable of

FIG. 9

, shown after the outer coiled tubing is swaged.





FIG. 11

is a sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the heater cable for the well of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 12

is a sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the heater cable for the well of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 13

is a schematic view of a heater cable as in

FIG. 1

having different heat producing capacities along its length.





FIG. 14

is a schematic view of a well having a pump as well as a heater cable.





FIG. 15

is a schematic view of one method of deploying the heater cable of

FIG. 1

into the well while live, showing a coiled tubing injector and snubber.





FIG. 16

is a schematic view of another method of deploying the heater cable of

FIG. 1

into the well while live, showing production tubing that has been isolated from well pressure by a plug.





FIG. 17

is a side view of heater cable being supported by sucker rod, rather than located within coiled tubing.





FIG. 18

is a sectional view of another method of deploying heater cable while the well is live, using a through tubing deployed packer.











DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to

FIG. 1

, wellhead


11


is schematically shown and may be of various configurations. Wellhead


11


is located at the surface or upper end of a well for controlling flow from the well. Wellhead


11


is mounted to a string of conductor pipe


13


, which is the largest diameter casing in the well. A string of production casing


15


is supported by wellhead


11


and extends to a greater depth than conductor pipe


13


. There may be more than one string of casing within conductor pipe


11


. In this example, production casing


15


is perforated near the lower end, having perforations


17


that communicate a gas bearing formation with the interior of production casing


15


. A casing hanger


19


and packoff support and seal the upper end of production casing


15


to wellhead


11


. Conductor pipe


13


and production casing


15


are cemented in place.




In this embodiment, a string of production tubing


21


extends into casing


15


to a point above perforations


17


. Tubing


21


has an open lower end for receiving flow from perforations


17


. Tubing hanger


23


supports the string of tubing


21


in wellhead


11


. A packoff


25


seals tubing hanger


23


to the bore of wellhead


11


. Production tubing


21


may be conventional, or it may have a liner


26


within its bore, as shown in FIG.


1


A. Liner


26


is a reflective coating facing inward for retaining heat within tubing


21


. Liner


26


may be made of plastic with a thin metal film that reflects heat loss back into the interior of tubing


21


. Alternately, liner


26


may be a plating on the inside of tubing


21


of a very thin layer of nickel, chrome or other highly reflective coating. Furthermore, in addition or in the alternative, a heat reflective plating or liner


28


of similar material could be located on the inner diameter of casing


15


.




In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, a string of coiled tubing


27


extends into tubing


21


to a selected depth. The depth need not be all the way to the lower end of production tubing


21


. Coiled tubing


27


is a continuous string of pipe of metal or other suitable material that is capable of being wrapped around a reel and deployed into the well. Production tubing


21


, on the other hand, is made up of individual sections of pipe, each about 30′ in length and secured together by threads. Coiled tubing


27


has a closed lower end


29


and thus the interior is free of communication with any of the production fluids. Coiled tubing hanger


31


and packoff


33


seal and support coiled tubing


27


in the bore of wellhead


11


.




An electrical cable


34


is located inside coiled tubing


27


, as illustrated in

FIGS. 2-4

, thus coiled tubing


27


may be considered to be a metal jacket that is a part of electrical cable


34


. Electrical cable


34


is installed in coiled tubing


27


while the coiled tubing is stretched out horizontally on the surface. It may be installed by pumping through a chase line, then pulling electrical cable


34


into coiled tubing


27


with the chase line. Electrical cable


34


is of a type that is adapted to emit heat when supplied with power and maybe constructed generally as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,301, all of which material is incorporated by reference. A voltage controller


37


supplies power to electrical cable


34


to cause heat to be generated.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, in the first embodiment, electrical cable


34


has a plurality of insulated conductors


39


(three in the preferred embodiment) and an outer wrap of armor


41


. Armor


41


comprises a metallic strip that is helically wrapped around insulated conductors


39


. Electrical cable


34


does not have the ability to support its own weight in most gas wells. Anchoring devices are employed in this embodiment to transfer the weight of cable


34


to coiled tubing


27


. The anchoring devices in this embodiment comprise a plurality of clamps


43


secured to armor


41


at various points along the length of electrical cable


34


. A plurality of dimples


45


are formed in coiled tubing


27


above and below each of the clamps


43


. While in a vertical position, the weight of electrical cable


34


will be transferred from clamps


43


to dimples


45


, and thus to coiled tubing


27


. A weldment


47


is filled in each dimple


45


on the outer surface of coiled tubing


27


to provide a smooth cylindrical exterior for snubbing operations. There are other types of anchoring devices available for transferring the weight of electrical cable


34


to coiled tubing


27


position, the weight of electrical cable


34


will be transferred from clamps


43


to dimples


45


, and thus to coiled tubbing


27


. A weldment


47


is filled in each dimple


45


on the outer surface of coiled tubing


27


to provide a smooth cylindrical exterior for snubbing operations. There are other types of anchoring devices available for transferring the weight of electrical cable


34


to coiled tubing


27


.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, insulated conductors


39


are secured together at the lower end at a lower termination


49


. At lower termination


49


, insulated conductors


39


will be placed in electrical continuity with each other. Lower termination


49


is wrapped with an insulation. Also, in the first embodiment, a dielectric liquid


51


is located in coiled tubing


27


in a chamber


53


at closed lower end


29


.





FIG. 4

illustrates more details of electrical cable


34


. Each insulated conductor


39


has a central copper conductor


55


of low resistivity. In this embodiment, the insulation includes two layers


57


,


59


around each copper conductor


55


. The inner layer


57


in this embodiment is a polyamide insulation while the outer layer


59


is a polyamide insulation. A lead sheath


61


is extruded around insulation


59


for assisting in conducting heat. Lead sheath


61


is in physical contact with armor


41


. The three insulated and sheathed conductors


55


are twisted together. Cavities


62


exist along electrical cable


34


within armor


41


and between insulated conductors


39


. Cavities


62


are preferably filled with the dielectric liquid


51


(

FIG. 3

) for conducting heat away from insulated conductors


39


. Similarly, an inner annulus


63


surrounds armor


41


within coiled tubing


27


. Inner annulus


63


is filled with the same dielectric liquid


51


(

FIG. 3

) as in cavity


62


because armor


41


does not form a seal. The dielectric liquid


51


in inner annulus


63


assists in transferring heat away from cable


34


. This not only enhances heat transfer to gas flowing within the well but also avoids excessive heat from damaging electrical cable


34


.




Referring again to the embodiment of

FIG. 1

, a siphon tube


65


leads from a syphon reservoir


67


to inner annulus


63


. Siphon tube


65


extends laterally through a port in wellhead


11


. Reservoir


67


contains dielectric fluid


51


(

FIG. 3

) and is typically located above the upper end of coiled tubing


27


. Thermal expansion will cause dielectric liquid


51


to flow into siphon tube


65


and up into reservoir


67


. When power to electrical cable


34


is turned off, the resulting cooling will cause dielectric fluid


51


to flow out of reservoir


67


and back through siphon tube


65


into coiled tubing


27


.




Referring still to

FIG. 1

, an intermediate annulus


69


surrounds coiled tubing


27


within production tubing


21


. This constitutes the main production flow path for gas from the well, the gas flowing out intermediate annulus


61


and through a flow line


71


that contains a valve


73


. Also, an outer annulus


75


surrounds production tubing


21


. A packer


78


seals production tubing


21


to production casing


15


near the lower end of tubing


21


, forming a closed lower end for outer annulus


75


.




A port


77


extends through wellhead


11


in communication with outer annulus


75


. Port


77


is connected to a line that has a valve


79


and leads to a vacuum pump


80


. Vacuum pump


80


, when operated will create a vacuum or negative pressure less than atmospheric within outer annulus


75


. The vacuum created within outer annulus


75


comprises a fluid of low thermal conductivity and low density to reduce heat loss from tubing


21


to the earth formation. Alternately, the fluid of low thermal conductivity within outer annulus


75


could be a liquid of low thermal conductivity and preferably high viscosity such as a crude oil with a viscosity of 1000 centipoise or higher.




Many gas wells are in remote sites not served by electrical utilities. In such cases, some of the gas production from tubing


21


could be used to power an engine driven electrical generator. The electricity from the generator would be used to power heater cable


34


.




Briefly discussing the operation, voltage controller


37


will deliver and control a supply of electrical power to electrical cable


34


. This causes heat to be generated, which warms gas flowing from perforations


17


up intermediate annulus


69


. The amount of heat is sufficient to raise the temperature of the gas to reduce condensation levels that are high enough to restrict gas flow. The temperature of the gas need not be above its dew point, because it will still flow freely up the well so long as large droplets do not form, which fall due to gravity and restrict gas flow. Some condensation can still occur without adversely affecting gas flow. The amount of heat needs to be only enough to prevent the development of a large pressure gradient in the gas flow stream due to condensation droplets.




The dew point is the temperature and pressure at which liquid vapor within the gas will condense into a liquid. The condensate may be a hydrocarbon, such as butane, or it may be water, or a combination of both. If significant condensate forms in the well, large droplets and slugs of liquid develop, which create friction. The friction drops the pressure and lowers the production rate. Preferably, heater cable


34


supplies enough heat to maintain the gas at a temperature sufficient to prevent frictional losses due to formation of condensate. The gas can be below the dew point in a cloudy state without detriment to the flow rate because large droplets of condensate are not produced in the cloudy state. Eliminating condensate that causes frictional losses allows the pressure to remain higher and increases the rate of production. The water and hydrocarbon vapors that remain in the gas will be separated from the gas at the surface by conventional separation equipment.





FIGS. 5 and 6

represent measurements of a test well in which a heater cable was employed.

FIG. 5

is a graph of pressure versus the depth of the well without heat being supplied by heater cable


34


(FIG.


1


). Plot or curve


81


represents pressure data points taken at various depths in the well while the well was not flowing, rather was shut in and live. That is, it had pressure at wellhead


11


of approximately 108 PSI but valves were closed to prevent the gas from flowing. The plot is substantially a straight line. Plot or curve


83


represents pressure monitored at various depths while the well was flowing, but still without heat being supplied by heater cable


34


. Note that the flowing plot


83


parallels shut-in plot


81


generally from the total depth to approximately 3000′. The pressure from 6000 feet to 3000 feet is approximately 3 to 5 PSI less while flowing, but generally on the same slope as while shut-in. At about 3000 feet, plot


83


changes to a much shallower slope. The slope from about 3000 to 1000 feet is still linear, but is substantially shallower than the slope of shut-in plot


81


. There is a sharp increase in slope around 800 to 1000 feet, then plot


83


resumes its shallow slope until reaching wellhead


11


. The slope of flowing plot


83


changes at point


87


, which is the point along the production tubing


21


where liquid droplets have collected in sufficient quantities to cause a large increase in pressure gradient. Significant condensation is occurring at point


87


, which thus drops the pressure and flow rate from 3000 feet up. The condition at and above point


87


is created by water droplets falling downward due to gravity and then collecting in slugs, which greatly restrict flow. Production gasses either have to bubble through the water slugs or the water slugs have to be pushed up the well by gas pressure.




The dashed line extending from point


87


upward at the same slope as the lower portion of flowing plot


83


indicate the theoretical pressures that would occur along the well from 3000 feet to the surface if condensation were not occurring. The pressure at the surface would be approximately 95 PSI rather than 60 PSI, thus resulting in a greater flow rate. The greater flow rate not only enables an operator to produce faster for additional cash flow but also may prevent a well from being abandoned because of a low flow rate, the abandonment resulting in residual gas remaining in the formation that does not get produced. The purpose of heater cable


34


(

FIG. 1

) is to apply enough heat to cause plot


83


to remain more nearly linear at the same slope as in the lower portion.




A video camera was also run through the well being measured in

FIG. 5

, and it confirmed that substantial condensation droplets existed approximately at the depths from 3000 feet to 1000 feet. Plots


81


,


83


were made in a conventional manner by lowering a pressure monitor on a wire line into the well.





FIG. 6

is a graph of depth versus temperature of a well with heat being supplied by heater cable


34


and without heat being supplied. Plot


89


is an actual measurement of the temperature gradient while the well was flowing but without heater cable


34


supplying heat. This plot was obtained by measuring the temperature at various points along the depth of the well. Plot


89


is approximately linear and differs only in slight amounts from a geothermal gradient of the well. Plot


91


represent temperature measurements made while heater cable


34


(

FIG. 1

) was being supplied with power. The temperature is considerably greater throughout the well, being about 60° to 80° higher than without power being supplied to heater cable


34


. The temperature difference depends on the structure of electrical cable


34


as well as the amount of power being supplied to electrical cable


34


. The test also showed that the gas flow rate increased substantially when heated as indicated by plot


91


in FIG.


6


. Condensate in the well was reduced greatly, the pressure at the surface increased, and the flow rate increased significantly. In one well, gas flow increased from about 100 mcf (thousand cubic feet) to 500-600 mcf. The temperature difference in that well average about 75 degrees over the length of heater cable


34


.




As mentioned, it is not necessary to maintain the gas at a temperature and pressure far above its dew point, rather the temperature should be only sufficient to avoid enough condensation that causes significant frictional losses. The well needs to be heated an amount sufficient to reduce droplets of condensation and thus the friction caused by them. Further, it may not be necessary to add as much heat in the upper portion of the well, such as the upper 1000 feet, because there will be insufficient residence time in this section for droplets to build up in sufficient quantity to cause any significant increase in pressure gradient. That is before condensation droplets have time to fall downward and form water slugs in the flow stream, they will have exited the well. Increasing the temperature far above the dew point would not be economical because it requires additional energy to create the heat without reducing the detrimental pressure gradient. The flow rate or gas pressure at wellhead


11


can be monitored at the surface and power to heater cable


34


varied accordingly by controller


37


. For example, the power could be reduced or turned off until the flowing pressure decreased a sufficient amount to again begin supplying power. Alternately, downhole sensors could be employed that monitor the temperature and/or pressure within the production tubing and turn the power to the heater cable on and off accordingly. Furthermore, when applying a vacuum to the tubing annulus


75


, particularly when using heat reflective liners


26


or


28


(

FIG. 1



a


), it may not be necessary to utilize heater cable


34


to apply heat. When heat losses to the earth formation are greatly reduced in this manner, the gas flowing through production tubing


21


may have enough heat within it to avoid detrimental condensation. In some cases, heater cable


34


may be necessary for heating only initially or occasionally.




There are a number of variations to different components of the system.

FIG. 7

shows a transverse cross section of an alternate lower termination to the one shown in

FIG. 3. A

copper block


92


is crimped around the three copper conductors


52


, shorting them together. A cannister or sheath


93


encloses block


92


and conductors


52


. An insulating compound


94


is filled in the spaces surrounding conductors


52


and block


92


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 7

, dielectric liquid


51


(FIG.


3


), reservoir


67


and siphon tube


65


are not required.





FIG. 8

shows a heater cable that is constructed generally as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,103,031. The three insulated conductors


55


are twisted together and located within a spacer or standoff member


95


that has three legs


95




a


spaced 120 degrees apart and a central body


95




b


. Conductors


55


are located within central body


95




b


. Standoff member


95


is preferably a plastic material extruded over the twisted conductors


55


and is continuous along the lengths of conductors


55


. A metal tubing


96


extends around standoff member


95


. An insulation filler material


97


may surround standoff member


95


within tubing


96


.




An advantage of the heater cable of

FIG. 8

is the small diameter of tubing


96


that is readily achievable. A larger diameter for the heater cable reduces the cross-sectional flow area for the gas flow up production tubing


21


(FIG.


1


). The heater cable of

FIG. 8

has an outer diameter no greater than one inch, and may be as small as one-half inch.




To manufacture the heater cable of

FIG. 8

, conductors


55


are formed within standoff member


95


and placed along a strip of metal. The metal is bent into a cylindrical configuration and welded to form the tubing


96


. Legs


95




a


of standoff member


95


position conductors


55


away from the sidewall of tubing


96


to avoid heat damage during welding. Filler material


97


maybe pumped into tubing


96


after it has been welded.




In the heater cable embodiment of

FIG. 9

, an elastomeric jacket


98


is extruded over insulated conductors


55


. Jacket


98


is placed on a flat metal strip, which is bent and welded at seam


100


to form tubing


93


. The inner diameter of tubing


93


is initially larger than the outer diameter of jacket


98


, although the difference would not be as great as illustrated in FIG.


9


. Then tubing


93


is swaged to a smaller diameter as shown in

FIG. 10

, with the inner diameter of tubing


93


in contact with the outer diameter of jacket


98


. Having an initial larger diameter allows conductors


55


and jacket


98


to be located off center of the center of tubing


93


during the welding process. Seam


100


can be located on an upper side of tubing


93


, while jacket


98


contacts the lower side of tubing


93


due to gravity. This locates conductors


55


farther from weld


55


while weld


55


is being made than if conductors


55


were on the center of tubing


93


. This off center placement reduces the chance for heat due to welding from damaging conductors


55


. After swaging, the center of the assembly of conductors


55


will be concentric with tubing


93


, as shown in FIG.


10


. The heater cable of

FIG. 10

also has an outer diameter in the range from one-half to one inch.





FIG. 11

shows a single phase conductor


99


, rather than the three phase electrical cable


34


of FIG.


4


. Also, this heater cable does not have an outer armor and is not located within coiled tubing. The heater cable of

FIG. 11

includes a copper conductor


99


of low resistivity. An electrical insulation layer


101


surrounds conductor


99


, and is exaggerated in thickness in the drawing. Because of the depth of most gas wells, a strengthening member


103


is formed around layer


101


to prevent the heater cable from parting due to its own weight. The strengthening member


103


could be aramid fiber or metal of stronger tensile strength than copper, such as steel. In this embodiment, strengthening member


103


surrounds insulation layer


101


, resulting in an annular configuration in transverse cross action. An elastomeric jacket


105


is extruded over strengthening member


103


to provide protection. If desired, the return for the single phase power could be made through strengthening member


103


, which although not as a good of a conductor as copper conductor


99


, will conduct electricity.




Because of its ability to support its on weight, the heater cable of

FIG. 11

would be deployed directly in production tubing


21


(

FIG. 1

) without coiled tubing


27


. In shallow wells, say less than about 5000 feet, it may not be necessary to use a strengthening member. Rather, the copper conductor


99


could be formed of hard drawn copper or a copper alloy such as brass or bronze, rather than annealed copper, adding enough strength to support the weight of the cable in shallow wells. The outer diameter of the heater cable of

FIG. 11

is preferably from one-half to one inch.




In

FIG. 12

, the outer configuration of the heater cable is shown to be flat, having two flat sides and two oval sides, rather than cylindrical. However, electrical cable


106


could also have a cylindrical configuration. Electrical cable


106


is also constructed so as to be strong enough to support its own weight. It has three separate copper conductors


107


, thus is to be supplied with three phase power. It has strengthening members


109


surrounding and twisted with each of the copper conductors


107


. Each strengthening member


109


may be of conductive metal, such as steel or of a non-conductor such as an aramid fiber. Strengthening members


109


have greater tensile strength than copper conductors


107


. An elastomeric jacket


111


surrounds the three assemblages of conductors


107


and strengthening members


109


. It is not necessary to have outer armor. Coiled tubing will not be required, either.





FIG. 13

shows another variation for electrical cable in lieu of electrical cable


34


.

FIG. 13

schematically illustrates an electrical cable


113


within a well, with the well depths listed on the left side. The amount of heat required at various points along the depth of the well is not the same in all cases. In some portions of the well, the gas may be near or above the dew point naturally, while in other points, well below the dew point. Consequently, it may be more feasible to supply less heat in certain portions of the well than other portions of the well to reduce the consumption of energy.




In

FIG. 13

, electrical cable


113


maybe of any one of the types shown in

FIGS. 2

,


4


,


7


-


10


or any other suitable type of electrical cable for providing heat. However, portions of the length of the electrical cable


113


will have different properties than others. For example, portion


113




a


, which is at the lower end, maybe made of larger diameter conductors than the other portions so that less heat is distributed and less power is consumed. Portion


113




b


may have smaller conductors than portion


113




a


or


113




c


. Portion


113




b


would thus provide more heat due to the smaller conductors than either portion


113




a


or


113




c


. Similarly,portion


113




c


may have larger conductors than portion


113




b


but smaller than portion


113




a


. This would result in an intermediate level of heat being supplied in the upper portion of the well. There are other ways to vary the heat transfer properties other than by varying the cross sectional dimensions. Changing the types of insulation or types of metal of the conductors will also accomplish different heat transfer characteristics.





FIG. 14

illustrates a variation of the system of FIG.


1


. Some water may also be produced from the formation along with saturated gas, and this water collects in the bottom of the well. If too much water collects in a low pressure gas well, it can greatly restrict the perforations and even shut in the well. In the system of

FIG. 14

, a pump


115


is located at the bottom of the well. In this example, pump


115


is secured to the lower end of coiled tubing


117


. Pump


115


has an intake


119


for drawing liquid condensate in that is collected in the bottom of the well. Pump


119


need not be a high capacity pump, and could be a centrifugal pump, a helical pump, a progressing cavity pump, or another type. Preferably, pump


115


is driven by an electrical motor


121


. The electrical power line


123


is preferably connected to electrical cable


125


that also supplies heat energy for heating the gas. A downhole switch (not shown) has one position that connects line


123


to cable


125


to supply power to pump


115


. The switch has another position that shorts the terminal ends of the three conductors of cable


125


to supply heat rather than power to pump


115


.




In the embodiment of

FIG. 14

, heater cable


125


has a continuous annulus


127


surrounding it within coiled tubing


117


. Preferably, pump


115


will have its discharge connected to coiled tubing


117


for flowing the condensate up the inner annulus


127


. The flow discharges out the open upper end of coiled tubing


117


and flows out a condensate flow line


129


leading from the wellhead. Gas will be produced out production tubing


131


. A vacuum pump connected to port


133


will reduce the pressure within the annulus surrounding production tubing


134


. A voltage controller


135


will not only control the heat applied to electrical cable


125


, but also control turning on and off the downhole switch at pump motor


121


. Additionally, if desired, a surface actuated isolation valve


136


can be placed between pump


119


and the interior of coiled tubing


117


so that the system can be deployed in a live well without fear that gas will enter coiled tubing


117


and flow to the surface.




Automatic controls can be installed on the surface to shut off the heater cable function and activate pump motor


121


whenever excessive water builds up in the well. This condition can be determined by evaluating pressure and flow rate conditions on the surface, by scheduling regular pumping periods to keep the well dry, or by measuring the pressure at the bottom of the well directly with instruments installed at the bottom of the assembly. A downhole pressure activated switch or other suitable means can be employed to automatically cut off pump motor


121


when the condensate drops below intake


119


.





FIG. 15

represents a preferred method of installing the system shown in FIG.


1


. The system of

FIG. 1

is live well deployable. That is, pressure will still exist at wellhead


11


while coiled tubing


27


is being inserted into the well, although production valves


73


,


79


maybe closed in. It is important to be able to install heater cable


34


(

FIG. 1

) while the well is live to avoid having to kill the well to install the new system. Killing low pressure gas wells is a very risky business because there is a good chance that the operator will not get the well back. When the reservoir energy is low, there may be insufficient pressure to push the kill fluid out of the formation and/or water may flow into the well faster than it can be swabbed out. If this happens, the well cannot be recovered and all production is lost. By installing the system in a live well, the risk of losing the well is avoided.




The preferred method of

FIG. 12

utilizes a pressure controller, which is a snubber or blowout preventer


137


of a type that will seal on a smooth outer diameter of a line, such as coiled tubing


27


or the heater cables of

FIGS. 7-12

, and allow it to simultaneously be pushed downward into the well. Blowout preventer


137


is mounted to wellhead


11


and has an injector


139


mounted on top. Injector


139


is of a conventional design that has rollers or other type of gripping members for engaging coiled tubing


27


and pushing it into the well. Blowout preventer


137


simultaneously seals on the exterior of coiled tubing


27


in this snubbing type of operation. Electrical cable


34


(

FIG. 1

) will be installed in coiled tubing


27


at the surface, then coiled tubing


27


is wrapped on a large reel


141


. Reel


141


is mounted on a truck that delivers coiled tubing


27


to the well site. It is important that coiled tubing


27


be smooth on the outside for the snubbing operation through blowout preventer


137


.




This system of

FIG. 15

could also be utilized with electrical cables that have the ability to support their own weight and are not within coiled tubing, such as shown in

FIGS. 11 and 12

. The heater cables of

FIGS. 11 and 12

are brought to the well site on a reel and deployed through stripper rubbers of blowout preventer


137


. The heater cables of

FIGS. 11 and 12

must be impervious to the flow of gas and be able to support their own weight when suspended from the top of well during installation and operation. A sinker or weight bar can be attached to the lower end of the heater cables of

FIGS. 11 and 12

to help the cables to slide down the well without getting caught.





FIG. 16

illustrates another live well deployable system. In

FIG. 16

, a coiled tubing injector is not required for installing the heater cable. Rather, a wireline deployable plug


145


will be installed first in production tubing


143


. The installation of plug


145


can be done by conventional techniques, using a blowout preventer with a stripper that enables plug


145


to be snubbed in. Once plug


145


is deployed, the wire line is removed. The interior of production tubing


143


will now be isolated from the pressure in casing


146


. The operator then lowers a heater cable assembly


147


into production tubing


143


. Heater cable assembly


147


may comprise coiled tubing having an electrical cable such as in any of the embodiments shown, or it may be a self-supporting type as in

FIGS. 11 and 12

. Once fully deployed in the well, heater cable assembly


147


is sealed at the surface. Then, plug


145


will be released. The releasing of plug


145


will communicate gas to the interior of production tubing


143


again. The releasing may be accomplished in different manners. One manner would be to apply pressure from the surface to cause a valve within plug


145


to release. Another method might be to pump a fluid into the well that will destroy the sealing ability of plug


145


.





FIG. 17

shows another type of heater cable assembly that could be employed in lieu of coiled tubing supported heater cable


34


(FIGS.


1


and


7


-


10


) or self-supporting heater cables of

FIGS. 11 and 12

. It would be employed in production tubing


143


(

FIG. 13

) or in another conduit that is isolated from well pressure by plug


145


. Heater cable


149


is strapped to a string of sucker rod


153


or some other type of tensile supporting member. Heater cable


149


may be electrical cable such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,301. Sucker rod


153


comprises lengths of solid rod having ends that are screwed together. Sucker rod


153


is commonly used with reciprocating rod well pumps. Straps


152


will strap electrical cable


149


to the string of sucker rod


153


at various points along the length. The assembly of

FIG. 16

is lowered in production tubing


143


of

FIG. 16

, then plug


145


is released.




Another embodiment, not shown, may be best understood by referring again to FIG.


1


. In

FIG. 1

, electrical cable


34


is installed in coiled tubing


27


at the surface prior to installing coiled tubing


27


in the well with injector


139


. Alternately, self-supporting electrical cable, such as the embodiments of

FIGS. 11 and 12

, could be installed in coiled tubing


27


after it has been lowered in place. Because coiled tubing


27


has a closed lower end


29


, it will be isolated from pressure within production tubing


21


. Self supporting cable, such as those shown in

FIGS. 11 and 12

, could be lowered into coiled tubing


27


from another reel. A weight or sinker bar could be attached to the end of the heater cable.





FIG. 18

illustrates still another method of installing heater cable within a live well, particularly a well that does not have a packer already installed between the tubing and the casing. The well has a production casing


157


cemented in place. Production tubing


159


is suspended in casing


157


, defining a tubing annulus


161


. Unlike

FIG. 1

, there is no packer located near the lower end of tubing


159


to seal the lower end of tubing annulus


161


. To prepare for a live well installation of heater cable, a hanger mandrel


163


is lowered into tubing


159


and set near the lower end of tubing


159


. A locking element


165


will support the weight of hanger mandrel


163


. Seals


167


on the exterior of mandrel


163


seal mandrel


163


to the interior of tubing


159


. Seals


167


may be energized during the landing procedure of mandrel


163


in tubing


159


.




Typically mandrel


163


has an extension joint


169


extending below it. A packer


171


is mounted to extension joint


169


. Packer


171


has a collapsed configuration that enables it to be lowered through tubing


159


, and an expanded position that causes it to seal against casing


157


, as shown. Once packer


171


has set, tubing annulus


161


will be sealed from production flow below packer


171


. Hanger mandrel


163


has an interior passage that allows gas flow from the perforations below packer


171


to flow up production tubing


159


.




Hanger mandrel


163


may be lowered by a wireline, which is then retrieved. Although pressure will exist in tubing


159


while hanger mandrel


163


is being run, a conventional snubber will seal on mandrel


163


and the wireline to while being run. When hanger mandrel


163


has landed within tubing


159


, packer


171


will be located below the lower end of tubing


159


. The operator then sets packer


171


in a conventional manner. Heater cable


175


, which maybe any one of the types described, is lowered into production tubing


159


to a point above mandrel


163


by using a snubber at the surface. Packer


171


allows the operator to draw a vacuum in tubing annulus


161


by a vacuum pump at the surface, so as to provide thermal insulation to tubing


159


. The operator supplies power to heater cable


175


to heat gas flowing up tubing


159


.




Prior to installing heater cable with any of the methods described above, calculations of the amount of energy to be deployed should be made. Pressure and temperature surveys should be made to determine the depth at which the water is building up in the tubing, causing the pressure gradient to greatly increase. The heat transfer rate to raise the production fluid temperature by the required amount is calculated. In order to do this, one must determine the heat transfer coefficient at the outer diameter of the coiled tubing


27


(FIG.


1


). The temperature needed at the outer diameter of the coiled tubing


27


to supply the required heat transfer rate is calculated. The heat transfer resistance from the coiled tubing


27


to casing


15


(

FIG. 1

) is determined. The heat transfer resistance from the heated production fluid to casing


15


is calculated. The heat transfer resistance from casing


15


to the earth formation is calculated. All of the heat transfer resistances are summed.




The heat transfer coefficient for fluid inside of coiled tubing


27


to the inner diameter of coiled tubing is determined. The temperature of fluid inside coiled tubing


27


to deliver the summed heat transfer rate is determined. The heat transfer coefficient at heater cable


34


(

FIG. 4

) surface is determined. The temperature of the heater cable surface


34


to deliver the summed heat transfer rate is calculated. The heat transfer coefficient from heater cable conductors


55


(

FIG. 4

) to heater cable outer surface


41


is calculated. The temperature of heater cable conductors


55


to deliver the summed heat transfer rate is calculated. The electrical resistance of the heater cable conductors is measured. The amperage needed to deliver the watt equivalent of the summed heat transfer rate is computed. The applied voltage needed to cause the desired amperage in the heater cable is then calculated.




The invention has significant advantages. Deploying the heater cable while the well is live avoids the risk of not being able to revive the well if it is killed. Once deployed, the heat generated by the heater cable reduces condensation, increasing the pressure and flow rate of the gas.




While the invention has been shown in only a few of its forms, it should not be limited to the embodiments shown, but is susceptible to various modifications without departing from the scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; and (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; wherein step (a) comprises inserting an electrical cable into a string of coiled tubing to form the cable assembly, providing an inner annulus within the coiled tubing between the cable and the coiled tubing; and the method further comprises placing a liquid in the inner annulus to increase heat transfer from the cable to the coiled tubing.
  • 2. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and wherein the conductor has at least two sections along its length, one of the sections providing a different amount of heat for a given amount of power than the other section, to apply different amounts of heat to the gas at different places in the well.
  • 3. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; wherein the well has a string of production tubing suspended within casing, and a packer set to define a closed lower end to a tubing annulus between the casing and the tubing, and wherein the method further comprises reducing a pressure of gas contained in the tubing annulus to below atmospheric pressure that exists at the surface of the well.
  • 4. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; (f) mounting a pump to the lower end of the coiled tubing, and pumping condensate of the gas out of the well; wherein step (a) comprises placing an electrical cable within a string of coiled tubing to form the cable assembly; and coiled wherein the pump flows the condensate up an inner annulus between the cable and the tubing.
  • 5. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; wherein the well contains a production tubing located within a production casing, the production tubing having an open lower end for the flow of the gas, and step (c) comprises: closing the open lower end of the production tubing; then lowering the cable assembly into the production tubing and sealing an upper end of the cable assembly to the wellhead; then opening the lower end of the production tubing.
  • 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the lower end is closed by installing a closure member within the production tubing; andthe lower end is opened by releasing the plug member from blocking the production tubing.
  • 7. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; wherein step (a) comprises providing an electrical cable with at least one strengthening member incorporated therein for supporting weight of the cable, the strengthening member having a higher tensile strength than the conductor: and step (d) comprises supplying power to the strengthening member as well as to the conductor.
  • 8. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; providing a string of production tubing within the well into which the cable assembly is lowered and through which the gas flows upward, and providing the production tubing with an inner passage having a heat reflective coating.
  • 9. A method of heating gas being produced in a well to reduce condensate occurring in the well, comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one insulated conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the well while the well is still live; (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated; (e) flowing gas up past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; providing a string of production tubing within the well into which the cable assembly is lowered and through which the gas flows upward, the production tubing being suspended within a string of casing, and providing the casing with an inner diameter having a heat reflective coating.
  • 10. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and reducing pressure within a tubing annulus surrounding the production tubing to less than atmospheric to reduce heat loss from the production tubing to the casing.
  • 11. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; wherein step (a) comprises: forming a standoff member around the conductor, the standoff member having a plurality of legs extending outward from a central body; placing the standoff member on a strip of metal; and bending the metal into a cylindrical configuration and welding a seam to define a tube surrounding the standoff member.
  • 12. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and wherein the conductor has at least two sections along its length, one of the sections providing a different amount of heat for a given amount of power than the other section, to apply different amounts of heat to the gas at different places in the well.
  • 13. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and wherein step (a) comprises insulating the conductor and installing the conductor within a string of coiled tubing.
  • 14. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and providing the production tubing an inner passage having a heat reflective coating.
  • 15. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, the method comprising:(a) providing a cable assembly having at least one conductor; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; then (d) applying electrical power to the conductor to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation; (e) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and providing the casing with an inner diameter having a heat reflective coating.
  • 16. A method of reducing condensate occurring in a gas well, the well having a production tubing suspended within casing, defining a tubing annulus between the casing and the tubing, the method comprising:(a) providing a heater cable assembly having three insulated conductors located within a string of coiled tubing; (b) coiling the cable assembly on a reel and transporting the cable assembly to a well site; (c) shorting lower ends of the conductors together; (d) installing a pressure controller at an upper end of the production tubing, sealing around the cable assembly with the pressure controller, and deploying the cable assembly from the reel into the production tubing while well pressure still exists within the production tubing; (e) with a vacuum pump located at the surface of the well, reducing pressure within the tubing annulus to below atmospheric pressure; (f) flowing gas up the production tubing past the cable assembly and out the wellhead; and (g) applying electrical power to the conductors to cause heat to be generated at a temperature within the production tubing that is sufficient to retard condensation of gas flowing up the production tubing.
  • 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein step (a) comprises providing the cable assembly with an outer diameter no greater than one inch.
  • 18. The method according to claim 16, wherein step (a) comprises:twisting the conductors together to form a conductor assembly and forming a standoff member around the conductor assembly, the standoff member having a plurality of legs extending outward from a central body; placing the standoff member on a strip of metal; bending the metal into a cylindrical configuration and welding a seam to define a tube surrounding the standoff member.
  • 19. The method according to claim 16, wherein the heater cable assembly has at least two sections along its length, one of the sections providing a different amount of heat for a given amount of power than the other section, to apply different amounts of heat to the gas at different places in the well.
  • 20. The method according to claim 16, further comprising providing the production tubing an inner passage having a heat reflective coating.
  • 21. The method according to claim 16, further comprising providing the casing with an inner diameter having a heat reflective coating.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/228,543, filed Aug. 28, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4572299 Vanegmond et al. Feb 1986 A
5782301 Neuroth et al. Jul 1998 A
6009940 Eck et al. Jan 2000 A
6103031 Aeschbacher et al. Aug 2000 A
6260615 Dalrymple et al. Jul 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Patent application Ser. No. 09/824,283, Filed Apr. 2, 2001 entitled “Method for Decreasing Heat Transfer from Production Tubing”.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/228543 Aug 2000 US