In many well applications, casing is deployed downhole into a wellbore and cemented in place within the wellbore. Additionally, various types of tubing or tools may be deployed and anchored within the casing or within other tubular structures. For example, various types of liners may be deployed and anchored within a surrounding tubing. The anchoring may be achieved by using a load anchor on the internal tubular structure. The load anchor is radially expanded into gripping engagement with the surrounding tubular structure, e.g. casing. Sometimes a seal is employed on the load anchor to provide a sealed engagement between the inner and outer tubular structure. However, the seal can be subjected to wear between the tubular structures, e.g. between inner and outer casings.
In general, a system and methodology are provided for facilitating anchoring between tubular structures in various well applications. The technique may utilize a load anchor having a mandrel with an interior passage. The mandrel is radially expandable upon application of sufficient pressure within the internal passage. Additionally, circumferential biasing members are mounted around the mandrel and each circumferential biasing member has a biasing surface. In some embodiments, each circumferential biasing member may be in the form of a beam spring secured along the exterior of the mandrel by a suitable retention mechanism. Additionally, a gripper system is positioned axially between the circumferential biasing members. The gripper system is configured such that engagement with the biasing surface of either circumferential biasing member causes radially outward movement of the gripper system upon movement of the mandrel in either axial direction. A sealing element also may be disposed about the mandrel. The configuration of the gripper system and the circumferential biasing members protects the sealing element against undue axial movement once the load anchor is radially expanded into engagement with a surrounding surface.
However, many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The disclosure herein generally involves a system and methodology which facilitate anchoring between tubular structures in various well applications. The technique may utilize a load anchor having a mandrel with an interior passage. The mandrel is radially expandable upon application of sufficient pressure within the interior passage. By way of example, a setting tool may be used to seal off the interior passage and to enable application of hydraulic pressure within the interior passage. However, the interior passage may be sealed off via closing a valve or via a ball dropped to block flow along the interior passage. Regardless of the technique used to close off the interior passage within the mandrel, the closure allows pressure to be increased in the interior passage until the mandrel, e.g. a thin-walled metal section of the mandrel, is radially expanded toward a surrounding casing or other wellbore tubular.
Additionally, the load anchor comprises circumferential biasing members mounted around the mandrel. Each circumferential biasing member has a biasing surface which may be a sloped/angled surface or other suitable surface to facilitate anchoring as explained in greater detail below. In some embodiments, each circumferential biasing member may be in the form of a beam spring secured along the exterior of the mandrel by a suitable retention mechanism. The load anchor also includes a gripper system positioned axially between the circumferential biasing members. Upon radial expansion of the mandrel, the gripper system is forced into engagement with the surrounding surface, e.g. the surrounding interior casing surface. A sealing element also is disposed about the mandrel and expands with the mandrel into sealing engagement with the surrounding surface.
The gripper system is configured such that engagement with the biasing surface of either circumferential biasing member causes radially outward biasing of the gripper system upon movement of the mandrel in either axial direction. This radially outward biasing ensures secure engagement of the load anchor with the surrounding surface while limiting axial sliding motion of the sealing element with respect to the surrounding surface. If the circumferential biasing members are in the form of beam springs, the beam springs may be preloaded so that the beam springs are able to expand axially to act against the biasing surface and thus maintain a radially outward biasing of the gripper system. The configuration of the gripper system and the circumferential biasing members effectively protects the sealing element against wear/damage once the load anchor is radially expanded into engagement with the surrounding surface.
Referring generally to
The load anchor 32 may comprise a single load anchor section 42 or a plurality of load anchor sections 42. According to an embodiment, each load anchor section 42 comprises a mandrel 44. It should be noted mandrel 44 may be a common mandrel passing through a plurality of the load anchor sections 42. In the example illustrated, each load anchor section 42 comprises a plurality of circumferential biasing members 46, e.g. a pair of circumferential biasing members 46, mounted around the mandrel 44. Additionally, a gripper system 48 is positioned around the mandrel 44 and between circumferential biasing members 46. A sealing element 50 also is disposed about the mandrel 44 and oriented for sealing engagement with a surrounding surface 52 of tubular 34.
By way of example, the surrounding surface 52 may be the interior surface of casing/tubular 34. When the mandrel 44 is radially expanded, the gripper system 48 and the sealing element 50 are expanded into engagement with the surrounding surface 52 to provide a secure, sealed anchor connection between outer tubular 34 and inner tubular 38. As explained in greater detail below, the gripper system 48 cooperates with circumferential biasing members 46 to protect the sealing element 50 against axial sliding motion with respect to surrounding surface 52 after the load anchor 32 is radially expanded into engagement with the surrounding surface 52.
With additional reference to
According to an embodiment, the mandrel 44 may be constructed with a thin-walled tube section 55 bounded by thicker walled ends. The thin-walled tube section 55 may be expanded by deploying a setting tool within the mandrel 44. The setting tool comprises packer elements which engage with the inner surface of the mandrel 44 at the thicker walled ends. Hydraulic fluid under pressure is then applied to the setting tool which delivers the hydraulic fluid into the interior passage 54 of mandrel 44. The packer elements contain the hydraulic fluid so that pressure may be increased to a pressure which causes elastic and then plastic deformation of at least the thin-walled tube section 55 of mandrel 44 as the mandrel 44 is radially expanded. The mandrel 44 is radially expanded until the gripper system 48 and sealing element 50 are moved into appropriate contact with surrounding surface 52. The hydraulic pressure is then released and the setting tool is removed.
In the illustrated example, the circumferential biasing members 46 are in the form beam springs 56 which each surround the mandrel 44 and may be secured to the mandrel 44 via a suitable retention mechanism 58. The retention mechanism 58 may be used to secure various types of circumferential biasing members 46 and may comprise various screws, keys, threads, and/or other retention mechanisms. In some embodiments, each retention mechanism 58 comprises single or plural retaining wires 60 which are received in corresponding slots formed in mandrel 44 and in the corresponding circumferential biasing member 46. The retaining wires 60 may be oriented circumferentially at axially outlying ends of the beam springs 56 to prevent axial movement of the axially outlying ends of the beam springs 56 along mandrel 44. In one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, the retaining wires 60 may be circular, rectangular, or any other shape without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Each circumferential biasing member 46/beam spring 56 may have a biasing surface 62 oriented to bias gripper system 48 in a radially outward direction when engaged with the gripper system 48 under sufficient axial force. By way of example, each biasing surface 62 may be in the form of an angled section 66 formed at a suitable angle, e.g. 30°-60°, with respect to an outer surface 68 of a cylindrical portion/body of mandrel 44.
According to the embodiment illustrated, the gripper system 48 comprises a plurality of gripper members 70, e.g. a pair of gripper members 70. The gripper members 70 are disposed about the mandrel 44 and each gripper member 70 is axially bounded by the biasing surface 62/angled section 66 on one side and by a fixed angle section 72 on the other side. The fixed angle section 72 may be formed at a suitable angle, e.g. 30°-60°, with respect to the outer surface 68 of mandrel 44. As illustrated, the fixed angle section 72 may be established by a radially extended portion 74 which is a unitary part of mandrel 44 extending radially outward from outer surface 68.
In this example, the sealing element 50 is disposed about the mandrel 44 and trapped in an axial position between abutments 76. According to an embodiment, the sealing element 50 may be disposed between gripper members 70. Abutments 76 may be formed on radially extended portions 74. In some embodiments, however, the sealing element 50 may not be mounted between the gripper members 70 and, instead, may be mounted about the mandrel 44 at a position axially outside of the plurality of gripper members 70.
The sealing element 50 may be formed of an elastomeric material, metal material, or other suitable material able to form the desired seal with surrounding surface 52. Additionally, the sealing element 50 may be formed from a single circumferential element or a plurality of circumferential elements which cooperate to form the desired seal against the surrounding surface 52.
Each gripper member 70 may comprise teeth 78 or other suitable gripping features designed to engage the surrounding surface 52 when the load anchor 32 is radially expanded. Additionally, each gripper member 70 may comprise angled surfaces 80 oriented to engage biasing surface 62/angled section 66 and fixed angle section 72.
To protect the sealing element 50 against axial loading of mandrel 44 in both directions, the biasing surfaces 62 of the respective circumferential biasing members 46 may be oriented toward each other in an axially inward direction as illustrated. Additionally, the fixed angle sections 72 may be oriented in an axially outward direction at a position between the pair of illustrated gripper members 70. Thus, regardless of the direction of loading on mandrel 44, the orientation of the biasing surfaces 62 and fixed angle sections 72 tends to bias the corresponding gripper members 70 in a radially outward direction so as to more firmly engage the surrounding surface 52. The firm engagement of gripper members 70 with surface 52 of the surrounding casing/tubular 34 reduces the potential sliding of sealing element 50 along surface 52. Also, by positioning the fixed angle sections 72 on an axially inward side of gripper members 70 while beam springs 56 are positioned on an axially outward side of gripper members 70, the ability of the sealing element 50 to slide axially is resisted. In other words, once the load anchor 32 is radially expanded, the fixed angled sections 72 block axial shifting of the sealing element 50 regardless of the direction of axial loading on mandrel 44. It should be noted the blocking of axial shifting of sealing element 50 also can be accomplished by placing the beam springs 56 on an axially inward side of gripper members 70 while fixed angle sections 72 are positioned on an axially outward side of gripper members 70.
Upon radial expansion of the mandrel 44, the circumferential biasing members 46, gripper members 70, and sealing element 50 also are radially expanded toward the surrounding surface 52. The radial expansion effectively forces gripper members 70 and sealing element 50 into engagement with the surrounding surface 52. In some applications, the circumferential biasing members 46 and gripper members 70 may be constructed to fracture/break in a controlled manner so as to release hoop stress during transition of the gripper members 70 and sealing element 50 into engagement with the surrounding surface 52. By way of example, the circumferential biasing members 46, gripper members 70, and/or other rings or features of load anchor 32 may be formed with axial slots machined to leave a thin portion of material. When expansion of the mandrel 44 provides sufficient force to break each of these thin portions, the components fracture in a controlled manner. Upon fracture, the components no longer have strength in the hoop direction so the components are free to continue expanding with the mandrel 44.
Once load anchor 32 is expanded, axial loading/shifting of the mandrel 44 causes interaction of gripper element surfaces 80 with corresponding biasing surfaces 62 and fixed angle sections 72. The interaction causes radially outward movement of the gripper system 48 and thus more secure engagement of load anchor 32 with the surrounding surface 52, e.g. with the surrounding casing surface. As a result, the gripper system 48 absorbs axial loading on mandrel 44 and protects the sealing element 50 from detrimental sliding motion with respect to surface 52.
When the circumferential biasing members 46 are in the form of beam springs 56, the beam springs 56 may be axially compressed, installed along the exterior of the mandrel 44, and fixed in place. The beam springs 56 are thus able to provide an axial biasing force against the corresponding gripper members 70. The beam springs 56 continue to provide this axial biasing force during and after radial expansion of mandrel 44. However, once the beam springs 56 and gripper members 70 undergo the controlled fracture to release hoop stress, the spring forces applied by beam springs 56 are able to drive the gripper members 70 in the radially outward direction and into surface 52.
In other words, each beam spring 56 applies a biasing force in an axial direction along the mandrel 44 as each beam spring 56 tries to return to its original length. Because the outlying ends of beam springs 56 are locked in place via retention mechanisms 58, each axially expanding beam spring 56 tends to force the corresponding biasing surface 62 against the angled surface 80 of the adjacent gripper member 70. This interaction between angled surfaces 62, 72 and 80 tends to drive the corresponding gripper members 70 radially outward against the surrounding surface 52, thus helping secure the load anchor 32 with respect to the surrounding tubular 34. The squeezing of the gripper members 70 helps maintain grip against the surrounding tubular 34 when the load anchor 32 has been fully expanded.
Referring generally to
Additionally, an axial slot 86 (see
Referring generally to
In this embodiment, the fixed angle sections 72 are formed on support rings 94 which may be mounted about mandrel 44 on axially inward sides of gripper members 70. The support rings 94 may be axially secured to mandrel 44 via ring retention mechanisms 90 in a manner similar to the securing of rings 88. For example, the ring retention mechanisms 90 may be in the form of rectangular wires, setscrews, threads, weldments, or other suitable retention mechanisms.
Use of rings 88 and support rings 94 facilitates construction of mandrel 44 with a substantially uniform thickness along its length. Additionally, the rings 88, 94 may be formed of different materials than the material used to construct mandrel 44. For example, the rings 88, 94 may be formed of other types of metal, certain elastomers, or other suitable materials for a given downhole application. It should be noted the rings 88 and support rings 94 also may be formed with axial slots 86 or other suitable features which enable controlled fracture and release of hoop stress during radial expansion of the mandrel 44.
In an operational example, the mandrel 44 is expanded radially outwards via hydraulic pressure applied along interior passage 54. By way of example, flow along interior passage 54 may be sealed off with a setting tool as described above. Hydraulic fluid may then be pumped down through the setting tool and into interior passage 54 between the packing elements of the setting tool. The pressure of the hydraulic fluid may be increased to elastically and then plastically deform the mandrel 44 in a radially outward direction.
In this example, the beam springs 56 and the gripper members 70 undergo controlled fracture during radial expansion to eliminate hoop stress via fracture along axial slots 86. The gripper members 70 and sealing element 50 are expanded along with mandrel 44 and moved into engagement with the surrounding surface 52 of outer casing/tubular 34. Once engaged with outer casing/tubular 34, the internal hydraulic pressure may be released.
During radial expansion of the beam springs 56 and gripper members 70, the beam springs 56 are able to actuate and to shift the angled section 66 of each beam spring 56 in an axial direction. Each angled section 66 squeezes against the corresponding angled surface 80 of the corresponding gripper member 70. This squeezing action via both angled sections 66 and fixed angle sections 72 tends to bias the gripper members 70 into improved engagement with the surrounding surface 52. Additionally, when the mandrel 44 is subjected to an axial load, the interaction between angled surfaces 66, 72, 80 tends to force the gripper members 70 in a radially outward direction and into firmer engagement with the surrounding surface 52. The positioning of fixed angle sections 72 and the firmer engagement of gripper members 70 with surrounding surface 52 substantially reduces the potential axial movement of the sealing element 50 relative to the surrounding surface 52.
By positioning the fixed angle sections 72 on an axially inward side of gripper members 70 while circumferential biasing members 46/beam springs 56 are positioned on an axially outward side of gripper members 70, the ability of the sealing element 50 to slide axially is resisted. When the load anchor 32 is radially expanded into engagement with surrounding surface 52, the fixed angled sections 72 block axial shifting of the sealing element 50 regardless of the direction of axial loading on mandrel 44. The resistance to or prevention of axial shifting with respect to sealing element 50 also can be accomplished by placing the circumferential biasing members 46/beam springs 56 on an axially inward side of gripper members 70 while fixed angle sections 72 are positioned on an axially outward side of gripper members 70. By reducing or eliminating the axial movement of sealing element 50 along surface 52, the life and long-term functionality of sealing element 50 may be substantially improved.
It should be noted the arrangement of circumferential biasing members 46/beam springs 56; gripper members 70; rings 88, 94; sealing element 50; and/or other components of load anchor 32 may be constructed and arranged in various configurations. In the embodiment illustrated in
Basically, various arrangements of circumferential biasing members 46/beam springs 56; gripper members 70, and fixed angle sections 72 may be combined to prevent axial sliding of the sealing element 50. With one beam spring 56 and one solid piece (e.g. fixed angle section 72) per gripper member 70 arranged such that the angled sections 66 of the beam springs 56 point towards or away from each other, then loads applied to the mandrel 44 in either axial direction do not result in compression of the beam spring 56 in the direction of axial load. Compression of the subject beam spring 56 would result in sliding motion of the sealing element 50 but such compression is blocked by the corresponding solid, fixed angle section 72. Thus, various embodiments may utilize two gripper elements 70 or even numbers of gripper elements 70 greater than two. With greater numbers of gripper elements 70, half the beam springs 56 would be pointed in one axial direction and the other half would be pointed in the opposite axial direction. However, the gripper elements 70 and the beam springs 56 can be arranged in various orders and patterns with half pointing in each axial direction.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Still referring to
As further shown in
In another arrangement according to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, the sealing element 50 may be reduced in size such that during hydraulic expansion of the mandrel 44 and the sealing element 50, only the lugs 98 are squeezed against the surrounding surface 52 (e.g., the outer casing). In operation, when hydraulic pressure is applied, the pressure pushes past one of the lugs 98, which has a tendency to collapse in the downward direction, as previously described. The applied pressure that pushes past the lug 98 is able to act on the underside of the other lug 98, squeezing the other lug 98 harder against the surrounding surface 52 and creating a contact force, thereby preventing pressure from escaping past the other lug 98. As the applied pressure continues, the pressure is able to eventually act on the underside of the first lug 98, squeezing the first lug harder against the surrounding surface 52 and creating another contact force. In this way, the contact forces of the lugs 98 with the surrounding surface 52 increase with applied pressure.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Although a few embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
The present document is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/861,614, filed Jun. 14, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/036803 | 6/9/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/251940 | 12/17/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1547025 | Harold | Jul 1925 | A |
3977473 | Page, Jr. | Aug 1976 | A |
5220959 | Vance, Sr. | Jun 1993 | A |
5749585 | Lembcke | May 1998 | A |
6467540 | Weinig et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
8678083 | Xu | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8875799 | Smith et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9518453 | Dilber et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9840878 | Martin et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10400529 | Patton | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030205386 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040182583 | Doane et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040244994 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070000664 | Ring et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20110038742 | Fleig et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120205873 | Turley | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120273236 | Gandikota et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150198005 | Delzell et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150315864 | Patton | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150345249 | Gorrara et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160047176 | Martin | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160076324 | Allen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090801 | Hazelip et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170356267 | Hazel | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203130031 | Aug 2013 | CN |
0898048 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2266908 | Nov 1993 | GB |
2398312 | Aug 2004 | GB |
2501988 | Nov 2013 | GB |
2512506 | Oct 2014 | GB |
2005121498 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007119052 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2012127229 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2014006373 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2020251940 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Examination Report received in GCC Patent Application No. 2015/09339 dated Nov. 29, 2017, 4 pages. |
Second Examination Report received in GCC Patent Application No. 2015/09339 dated May 31, 2018, 3 pages. |
Combined Search and Examination Report received in GB Patent Application No. GB1407746.5 dated Aug. 22, 2014, 4 pages. |
Office Action received in European Patent Application No. 15726243.7 dated Jan. 27, 2020, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2015/051270 dated Oct. 28, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2015/051270 dated Nov. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Office Action received in the BR Application BR112016025643-3, dated Jul. 12, 2020 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/036803 dated Sep. 21, 2020 (14 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220259934 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62861614 | Jun 2019 | US |