None.
Disclosed embodiments relate generally to subsea flowline jumpers and more particularly to an apparatus and method for monitoring load and vibration on a flowline jumper during installation and/or production operations.
Flowline jumpers are used in subsea hydrocarbon production operations to provide fluid communication between two subsea structures located on the sea floor. For example, a flowline jumper may be used to connect a subsea manifold to a subsea tree deployed over an offshore well and may thus be used to transport wellbore fluids from the well to the manifold. As such a flowline jumper generally includes a length of conduit with connectors located at each end of the conduit. Clamp style and collet style connectors are commonly utilized and are configured to mate with corresponding hubs on the subsea structures. As is known in the art, these connectors may be oriented vertically or horizontally with respect to the sea floor (the disclosed embodiments are not limited in this regard).
Subsea installations are time consuming and very expensive. The flowline jumpers and the corresponding connectors must therefore be highly reliable and durable. Flowline jumpers can be subject to large static and dynamic (e.g., vibrational) loads during installation and routine use. These loads may damage and/or fatigue the conduit and/or connectors in the flowline jumper and may compromise the integrity of the fluid connection. There is a need in the art for improved flowline jumper technology that enables maximum production flow without jeopardizing jumper integrity.
A flowline jumper is configured for providing fluid communication between first and second spaced apart subsea structures. The flowline jumper includes a length of conduit having a predetermined size and shape and first and second connectors deployed on opposing ends of the conduit. The first and second connectors are configured to couple with corresponding connectors on the subsea structures. At least one electronic sensor is deployed on the conduit. The sensor is configured to measure at least one of a vibration and a load in the conduit.
A hydrocarbon production method includes producing wellbore fluids through a subsea flowline jumper at a controlled flow rate. The flowline jumper provides a fluid passageway for the wellbore fluid between first and second subsea structures. A sensor deployed on the flowline jumper measures at least one of a vibration and a load in the jumper. The sensor measurement is transmitted to a control system at a surface location evaluated against a predetermined threshold. The flow rate is maintained when the sensor measurement is less than a predetermined threshold and reduced when the sensor measurement is greater than a predetermined threshold.
The disclosed embodiments may provide various technical advantages. For example, certain of the disclosed embodiments may provide for more reliable and less time consuming jumper installation. For example, available sensor data from the flowline jumper(s) may improve first pass installation success. The disclosed embodiments may further enable the state of the flowline jumper to be monitored during jumper installation and production operations via providing sensor data to the surface. Such data may provide greater understanding of the system response and performance and may also decrease or even obviate the need for post installation testing. The sensor data may also indicate the presence of potentially damaging vibrational conditions such as flow induced vibration and vortex induced vibration.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed subject matter, and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It will be appreciated that the disclosed embodiments are not limited merely to the subsea production system configuration depicted on
As described in more detail below with respect to
Flowline jumper connectors 112 and 114 are commonly configured for vertical tie-in and may include substantially any suitable connector configuration, for example, clamp style or collet style connectors configured to mate with corresponding hubs on the subsea equipment. While the connectors are commonly oriented vertically downward (e.g., as depicted) to facilitate jumper installation with vertically oriented hubs, it will be understood that the disclosed embodiments are not limited in this regard. Horizontal tie in techniques are also known in the art and are common in larger bore connections. Moreover, it will be further understood that the conduit 110 and connectors 112 and 114 do not necessarily lie in a single vertically oriented plane (as in the M-shaped conduit 110 in the depicted embodiment). The conduit may be shaped in substantially any two- or three-dimensional configuration suitable for providing fluid communication between subsea structures.
With continued reference to
The sensor(s) 120 may include substantially any suitable sensor types. For example, in one embodiment, a vibration sensor 120 may include an accelerometer, such as a triaxial accelerometer set coupled to an outer surface of the conduit 110. Suitable triaxial accelerometers are commercially available from Honeywell and Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Ltd. Suitable accelerometers may also include micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) solid-state accelerometers, available, for example, from Analog Devices, Inc. MEMS accelerometers may be advantageous in certain applications in that they tend to be shock resistant and capable of operating over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. In another embodiment a load sensor 120 may include one or more strain gauges, for example, coupled to an outer surface of the conduit 110. Strain gauges are available from Omega Engineering.
The vibrational and/or load sensors 120 may be deployed to detect various vibrational and/or load components (or modes) in the conduit. Triaxial accelerometers may be deployed such that they are sensitive to both axial and cross-axial vibrations in the jumper conduit 110. For example, a first sensor axis may be aligned with the conduit axis, a second sensor axis may be perpendicular to the conduit axis and parallel with the jumper plane, and a third sensor axis may be perpendicular with both the conduit axis and the jumper plane. Likewise, in another example, strain gauges may be deployed such that the strain gauge axis is parallel with the axis of the conduit (such that the strain gauge is sensitive to loads along the axis of the conduit) and/or perpendicular with the axis of the conduit (such that the strain gauge is sensitive to cross axial loads, e.g., bending loads that are oriented perpendicular to the length of the conduit).
It will be appreciated that vibration sensor(s) 120 (such as accelerometers) may be employed to monitor the accelerations (and therefore the movement) of the jumper conduit. As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, flowline jumpers are subject to both flow induced vibrations (FIV) from the flow of production fluid in the flowline jumper and vortex induced vibrations (VIV) from ocean currents external to the flowline jumper. Such FIV and VIV can be significant and over prolonged times may lead to fatigue and failure of the flowline jumper connections and welded joints. Sensor packages employing cross-axial (transverse) accelerometers may enable FIV and VIV conditions to be detected and quantified. Real time monitoring of these conditions along the flowline jumper conduit may be used to estimate the mechanical fatigue in the jumper (e.g., at a welded joint or at the connection) to provide a more accurate estimate of the useful life of the riser sections. Such measurements may improve safety while at the same time providing cost savings by eliminating overly conservative estimates that are sometimes made in the absence any measurements.
It will be further appreciated that load sensor(s) 120 (such as strain gauges) may be utilized to monitor absolute loads in the flowline jumper conduit and connectors. As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, flowline jumpers may be subject to large static loads, for example, due to thermal expansion of casing and pipeline components. By monitoring these loads during a production operation, the corresponding movement of the flowline jumper, the overall shape change induced, and the changes in the angles between the conduit and connectors may be calculated. This information may be used to evaluate the integrity of the flowline jumper.
With continued reference to
Additional disclosed embodiments include a two-stage landing cylinder for landing subsea structures at the sea floor. During installation of such structures, there is generally a need for a controlled velocity landing that controls the deceleration of the structure as it approaches its final position. Single stage water dampers are known and commonly used during such installations. However, there is a need for a two-step landing system to provide better control (or even manual control in the second stage).
During a landing operation, the lowering velocity (the velocity of the structure being lowered) is initially determined by the number and diameter of the through holes 322 located above the piston 304 (in the pressure chamber). As the structure is lowered and the piston 304 moves upwards in the housing 310, the number of through holes decreases and the structure decelerates. Thus the lowering velocity in the first stage is initially relatively high and then decreases as the number of holes in the pressure chamber decreases. The velocity and deceleration of the piston may thus be determined, in part, by the distribution of the through holes 322 and may be derived mathematically, for example, as follows:
The differential pressure p across the cylinder (housing) wall may be given as follows:
where mwet represents the wet weight of the structure being installed, g represents gravitational acceleration, A represents the cross sectional area of the piston, and pambient represents the ambient pressure. The flow rate Q out of the housing (through the holes 322) may be given as follows:
where n represents the number of holes located above the cylinder (in the pressure chamber), Ahole represents the cross sectional area of each of the holes, ρ represents fluid density, and k represents a pressure loss factor for the hole. The lowering velocity v may be given as follows:
where d represents the cylinder diameter and Q is as the flow rate as defined above. As the piston moves upwards in the cylinder, the number of holes n decreasing, thereby decreasing the flow rate Q and the lowering velocity v.
As stated above, there are no holes in the upper section 330 of the housing 310. A controlled landing is obtained by opening (or partially opening) valve 333, thereby allowing the remaining fluid to flow out of the chamber 305. The landing speed in the second stage may thus be controlled at substantially any suitable velocity (based on the position of the valve 333).
During retrieval of the subsea structure, there is generally a need for a rapid return of the piston which requires unrestricted flow into the chamber 305. Check valve 336 is intended to provide such unrestricted flow into the chamber (but blocks flow out of the chamber).
Although a system and method for load and vibration monitoring on a subsea flowline jumper has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3373807 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3523579 | Nelson | Aug 1970 | A |
4225160 | Ortloff | Sep 1980 | A |
4232547 | Kasper | Nov 1980 | A |
4290311 | Brewer | Sep 1981 | A |
5320175 | Ritter et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
6257162 | Watt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6481504 | Gatherar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6663453 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700835 | Ward et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7044228 | Langford et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7565931 | Saucier | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8555978 | Ganelin et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8857519 | Hale | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8950497 | Critsinelis et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9181942 | Batho et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214816 | Batho et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9534452 | Hatton | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9534453 | Machin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9657525 | Ray et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20030008577 | Quigley | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030145997 | Langford et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030145998 | Langford | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060118308 | Saucier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090133612 | Wajnikonis | May 2009 | A1 |
20100288503 | Cuiper et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110042934 | Morck | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110139460 | Selstad | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110297389 | McKay | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120107050 | Wolbers et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152559 | Knox | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192982 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120275274 | Gochnour et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294114 | Gochnour et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130043035 | Hale | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130118249 | Conn | May 2013 | A1 |
20130292129 | Tan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140299328 | Ray | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150096758 | Babbitt | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150219508 | Bryant | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150226352 | Oyen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160044390 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160160630 | Flight | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160273694 | Cox et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160340988 | Abou-Assaad et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160362956 | Older et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180156024 | Coble et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3636252 | Oct 1988 | DE |
1832798 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2456831 | Jul 2009 | GB |
2457278 | Aug 2009 | GB |
2006050488 | May 2006 | WO |
2009109747 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011119479 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Appl. No. 17204152.7 dated Apr. 25, 2018; 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Appl. No. 17204188.1 dated Jun. 28, 2018; 8 pages. |
3rd Party Observations Communication Pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC, issued in related European Patent Application No. 17204152.7 dated Sep. 20, 2019, 5 pages. |
API Recommended Practice 17R, “Recommended Practice for Flowline Connectors and Jumpers”, American Petroleum Institute, Mar. 2015, 60 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received in European Patent Application No. 17204152.7 dated Dec. 16, 2019, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 21153265.0 dated Apr. 8, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180156026 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |