This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Application PCT/NO2014/050106, filed Jun. 19, 2014, which international application was published on Dec. 24, 2014, as International Publication WO2014/204320 in the English language. The international application is incorporated herein by reference, in entirety. The international application claims priority to Norwegian Patent Application No. 20130851, filed Jun. 19, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference, in entirety.
There is described a load handling device for lifting and lowering a load. More specifically there is described a load handling device for lifting and lowering a load, where the load handling device comprises an elongated member adapted to be connected to a load, a capstan, including one or more sheaves, through which the elongated member is running, wherein the capstan defines a low tension side and a high tension side of the elongated member.
A capstan can be seen as a black box acting as a force amplifier or a force reducer for a rope, a wire, or any elongated member running therethrough. In the following the word “rope” shall be understood as including any elongated member adapted to be connected to and to carry a load. The force amplification or reduction through a capstan will follow the Eytelwein formula:
wherein S1 is the rope force acting on a high tension side of the capstan, S2 is the rope force acting on a low tension side of the capstan, μ is the friction coefficient, and α is the total angle swept by all turns of the rope measured in radians. The maximum rope force amplification or reduction will be reached when
and the rope will start sliding. In the following the S1/S2 ratio will be called the amplification factor or reduction factor, depending on the direction of the travel of the rope. Because sliding of the rope is undesirable, capstan systems are typically overdesigned by letting the rope sweep one or more turns in addition to what is needed. The one or more additional turns will create more bends for the rope running through the capstan. Usually this is considered to be a small price to pay for having gained additional safety against sliding. For a load smaller than the maximum load of the system, the capstan will be even further overdesigned, doing several unnecessary turns around the capstan sheaves. Usually, this is also considered to be a small price to pay for gaining a high safety factor against sliding.
Overdesigning a capstan system, however, creates a number of drawbacks, some of which are not understood by most capstan designers, and which might even reduce the safety of the system. The drawbacks that are described in the following will typically be even more pronounced in offshore lifting devices comprising heave compensation systems for counteracting the heave acting on a vessel on which the lifting device is placed. The rope will be travelling back and forth in order to compensate for the heave motion of the vessel to keep the load stable relative to a seabed or to another vessel, and the rope will thus be exposed to a great number of bending cycles with the rope under high tension.
In a capstan system sheaves are typically arranged quite close to each other. The sheaves might be connected, such as in a double capstan system, or they might be individually driven, or the capstan might comprise a combination of the connected and individually driven sheave arrangements. If the motion of the rope is frequently reversed, such as in an above mentioned offshore heave compensated operation, this might lead to a premature failure of the rope.
When a rope is travelling back and forth in a capstan, the affected rope sections will be bent every time they enter a sheave and they will be straightened every time they leave a sheave. Due to the friction within the rope and between the rope and the sheaves, the affected rope sections and capstan sheaves will heat up. This might lead to a loss of lubricant, and as a consequence, to an accelerated degradation of the rope. Heat might also start a strain ageing process in the rope wires. The heating effects tend to increase with increasing rope diameter.
When a rope does more bending cycles than necessary, there is a risk that exponential force amplifications build up from both sides of the capstan, thus leading to a force peak in the capstan system. The rope travelling through the capstan then not only does more bending cycles than necessary but these bending cycles might be done under loads higher than what is considered to be a maximum rope force of the system. The combination of the unfortunate effects of excessive bending cycles and loads will lead to a much higher bending fatigue and, as a consequence, to a considerably reduced rope life. In several cases the rope force have increased to a level higher than the breaking strengths of the ropes, which have thus lead to overload failures of the ropes within the capstan system. Some failures of capstan orientation/axes might also be the consequence of the fact that the rope forces in the system were much higher than what the designer had predicted.
Yet another drawback of the prior art arises from the fact that the force distribution in a capstan system is different when a load is lifted compared to when a load is lowered. This implies that every time the motion of the rope is reversed, the force on a section of a rope may be substantially increased or lowered. This will lead to a great amount of tension-tension fatigue which will add up to the already mentioned bending fatigue due to the superfluous sheaves. In addition the rope will continuously change its length while lying on a sheave in order to adapt to the changing rope forces, thus causing abrasion both on the rope and on the sheaves of the capstan.
The drawbacks of the prior art will also be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
It is an object of the invention to remedy or to reduce at least one of the drawbacks of the prior art or at least to provide a useful alternative to the prior art.
The object is achieved by means of features which are disclosed in the following description and in the claims that follow.
In a first aspect the invention relates to a load handling device for lifting and lowering a load, the load handling device comprising:
In one embodiment the load handling device may comprise one or more load sensing devices. The load sensing devices, which may be load cells as known in the art, may be provided on the low tension side and/or on the high tension side of the capstan. The one or more load sensing devices may be incorporated into one or more sheaves on the low tension side and/or on the high tension side of the capstan.
A control unit, such as a programmable logic controller or a microcontroller or the like, may be used to regulate the tension regulating member. Optionally the control unit can base its regulation of the tension regulating member on the sensed loads from the load sensing devices. The control unit may further be used to find/calibrate the amplification/reduction factor. After a few lifts or test lifts with the system, the control unit may know what the amplification or reduction factor of the system is, maybe even how the factor will change when using a dry rope or a wet rope. It could then just measure the rope force at the high tension side, divide it by this factor in order to determine the force at which the rope will start sliding and keep the rope force on the low tension side slightly above this level. Alternatively, a staring value for the amplification factor can be manually set and reduced until the rope starts sliding, then increasing the rope force slightly again so as to secure the load and ensure that the system is operated with an optimum rope force distribution.
The control unit may further be connected to a storage unit for storing data from previous operations. This may be beneficial for the load handling device for automatically adjusting to new conditions.
In one embodiment the tension regulating member may comprise a storage drum on which at least a part of the elongated member is stored. For lifting and lowering operations a storage drum may be sufficient for regulating the tension on the low tension side of the capstan. In heave compensation operations, on the other hand, the storage drum would be required to continuously rotate back and forth, which might be a problem due to the great inertias involved.
In one embodiment the tension regulating member may comprise a separate tension control system. The tension control system may be provided between the capstan and a storage drum. In a heave compensation operation, the capstan and the tension control system would move, while the big masses of the storage drum and the payload will not. The tension control system may comprise one or more displaceable sheaves, through which the elongated member is running, adapted to regulate the tension of the elongated member on the low tension side. In one specific embodiment the tension control system may consist of three sheaves. In the direction from the capstan towards the storage drum, the rope may travel 90° over a first sheave with a fixed position. The rope then travels 180° over a second sheave which can be moved up or down by a drive unit, such as hydraulic cylinder. Finally the rope travels 90° over a third sheave with a fixed position. The rope tension can be increased by lifting the middle sheave by means of the drive unit, thereby stretching the rope and increasing its tension. In a similar way, the rope tension can be reduced by lowering the second sheave by means of the drive unit.
The tension control system may be connected to a control unit.
In one embodiment the tension regulating member may comprise a sheave engaging and/or disengaging unit. In a capstan with individually controllable sheaves, one way of regulating the force on the low tension side could be to selectively engage and disengage the sheaves on the low tension side of the capstan. Disengagement of a sheave implies letting the sheave be free-wheeling. The disengaging unit may thus comprise the control unit individually controlling a drive unit for one or more of the sheaves in the capstan.
In one embodiment the tension regulating member may comprise a friction regulating unit. It is possible to regulate the tension on the low tension side also by controlling the friction of the rope. This may be done by means of a clamp acting normally on the elongated member so as to adjust the friction. Alternatively or in addition, the friction regulating unit may comprise one or more engageable and disengageable magnets acting normally on the elongated member. The friction regulating device may further comprise a lubricating unit.
In practical embodiments it may be challenging to control the adjustment of the tension of the rope by adjusting the friction. The amplification/reduction factor depends exponentially on the friction, and small changes in friction will lead to large changes in the amplification/reduction, thus making it challenging for the force regulating member to react fast enough. It may thus be beneficial to keep the capstan and the elongated member at a more or less constant friction, for instance by constantly wettening the capstan.
In one embodiment one or more sheaves of the capstan may at least partially be made from a material with a higher friction coefficient than that of steel, such as Becorit®. Becorit is known for having a high friction coefficient, much higher than that of steel, thus possibly reducing the number of required sheaves significantly. A reduced number of sheaves will reduce the bending fatigue of the elongated member. The one or more Becorit sheaves may preferably be provided on the low tension side of the rope, and the one or more Becorit sheaves may be engageable/disengageable as described above.
There is also described a vessel provided with a load handling device according to the above description.
In a second aspect the invention relates to a method for lowering and/or lifting a load by means of a load handling device according to claim 1 of the present invention, the method comprising the step of:
In one embodiment the method may comprise the step of:
Further the method may comprise the steps of:
A great advantage of the present invention is that existing overdesigned capstan systems could be fitted with a load regulating member according to the above description and thus render possible reverse motion. The tension regulating member may ensure safe operation, and in many cases the number of wraps around the capstan may be reduced.
Once a capstan is provided with a tension regulating member on the low tension side of the rope, the capstan will be operated under lower rope forces compared to prior art, leading to longer rope life and reduced abrasion on both the rope and on the capstan sheaves. Peak loads in the system can be avoided.
In the following examples of preferred embodiments are shown with reference to accompanying drawings where:
In the following the reference numeral 1 indicates a load handling device according to the present invention. Identical numerals refer to identical or similar parts, and the figures are shown schematically and simplified.
The rope 3 in the capstan 2 of
The graph in
The graph of
According to established theory which is the basis for the design of all capstans according to prior art, the maximum rope force in the system will always be found on the entrance of the capstan 2 when lifting a load 5 and on the exit of the capstan 2 when lowering a load 5. In practice, however, force distributions like the one shown in
The graph in
When lifting, the rope force on the 10th sheave will have a rope force of 50 t, as indicated with the with letter A in
According to the present invention, one solution to overcome the above mentioned drawbacks is to regulate the tension on the low tension side 31 of the rope 3, so as to reduce for instance the big gap between points A and B in
If the force on the low tension side 31 is lowered as much as to 0,205 t, the curves for lifting and lowering, and thus the points A and B will coincide like shown in
This means that the system is operating at or near the force on the low tension side for which the rope 3 starts sliding.
It may be beneficial to vary the rope force on the low tension side 31 of the rope 3 when the motion of the rope is reversed. In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20130851 | Jun 2013 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2014/050106 | 6/19/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/204320 | 12/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3101912 | Bartlett | Aug 1963 | A |
3241785 | Barrett | Mar 1966 | A |
3263965 | Mutch | Aug 1966 | A |
3309065 | Prud Homme | Mar 1967 | A |
3343810 | Parnell | Sep 1967 | A |
3606854 | Van Lunteren | Sep 1971 | A |
3618897 | Swoboda, Jr. | Nov 1971 | A |
3653636 | Burrell | Apr 1972 | A |
3679180 | Callaghan | Jul 1972 | A |
3791628 | Burns | Feb 1974 | A |
3893249 | Wolters | Jul 1975 | A |
3918653 | Harms | Nov 1975 | A |
3927867 | Herchenroder | Dec 1975 | A |
4147330 | Eik | Apr 1979 | A |
4234167 | Lane | Nov 1980 | A |
4349179 | Barber | Sep 1982 | A |
4379615 | Toda | Apr 1983 | A |
4593885 | Hackman | Jun 1986 | A |
4678132 | Fowler | Jul 1987 | A |
5114026 | Van Ketel Hendrik | May 1992 | A |
5351430 | Hystad | Oct 1994 | A |
5470005 | King | Nov 1995 | A |
5673143 | Chin | Sep 1997 | A |
6926260 | De Groot | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7389973 | Chou | Jun 2008 | B1 |
20020166917 | Eagelman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20100262384 | Marfani | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308289 | Dalsmo | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110260126 | Willis | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20150102152 | Duehring | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/NO2014/050106 dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
Written Opinion for PCT/NO2014/050106 dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
Written Opinion for PCT/NO2014/050106 dated May 26, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 2, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160107867 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |