1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to voltage regulators, and more specifically to voltage regulators in an integrated circuit.
2. Related Art
A low-dropout regulator is implemented in circuit applications to provide a regulated power supply. A low-dropout regulator is a DC linear voltage regulator that has a very small input-to-output differential voltage.
One of the important aspects of any voltage regulator is load regulation. Unless compensated for, the output voltage of a voltage regulator decreases as the output current increases. The output voltage from a voltage regulator varies as a function of the output, or load, current because of a presence of a plurality of resistances in the coupling between the regulator and its load.
There is a voltage drop between the output 130 of the known regulator 108 and node 138 that is caused by a total resistance between the output 130 of the regulator 108 and node 138. The total resistance includes the resistance due to the metal run 124 on the IC 101 between the output 130 of the regulator 108 and a bond pad 128 at an end of the metal run, the resistance due to the connection with the wire bond 126 at the bond pad, the resistance of the wire bond, and the resistance of the power-out pin 132 and connections thereat. The known regulator 108 requires that the voltage drop at node 138 due to the total resistance be compensated for. A typical known regulator 108 determines the total resistance by measuring the voltage at node 138. Then, the typical regulator 108 places the amount of the voltage drop (between the output 130 and node 138) into a feedback loop (not shown) within the known regulator so that the desired regulated voltage appears at node 138. The known regulator 108 senses the voltage at node 138 via a sense pin 182 on the IC package 102. Therefore, the known regulator 108 disadvantageously requires the sense pin 182 in additional to the power-out pin 132.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and is not limited by the accompanying figures, in which like references indicate similar elements. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.
There is a voltage drop between the output 230 of the regulator 208 and node 238 that is caused by a resistance, RS 301 (see
Referring now to
V
O2
=V
REF*(1+R2/R1)
Load regulation is the ability of the voltage regulator to regulate a specified output voltage under varying load currents, as described by the equation
Load regulation=ΔVO/ΔIO=(1/(gmp*A))*(R2/R1+1),
where a series resistance, RS, of the output of the regulator is assumed to be zero, gmp is the DC transconductance of the drive device 308, and A is the DC gain, i.e., the open loop gain, of the error amplifier 304. The higher the open loop gain is, the lower the load regulation becomes. But as the open loop gain increases, the system stability is jeopardized. Therefore, the load regulation is limited by some finite amount of open loop gain at DC. However, in an actual circuit, such as the circuit shown in
The exemplary embodiment of the voltage regulator 208 has a gain of two and an input reference voltage of 1.2 v; therefore, the voltage at the output 230 is regulated to 2.4 v. Resistance RS 301 in series with the load current forms an IR drop between the output 230 of the voltage regulator 208 and the external portion 236 of the power-out pin 232. The output is taken at node VO2, which is preceded by a series resistance, RS. When RS and IFB are considered, the equation for VO2 becomes:
V
O2
=V
REF*(R2/R1+1)−(ILOAD*RS)+(IFB*R2).
Setting (IFB*R2)−(ILOAD*RS)=0, yields IFB=(RS/R2)*ILOAD.
The correction current, or feedback current, IFB, is the ratio (RS/R2) multiplied by the load current, ILOAD.
The voltage regulator 208 includes a current feedback circuit. The operation of the current feedback circuit is as follows: The gate area size ratio of transistor 308 to transistor 320 is defined as N. The current in transistor 308 is mirrored in transistor 320 and divided by N. The current in transistor 320 has a magnitude defined as IO/N. In other words, IM1 is equal to IO/N. Transistor 324 and transistor 328 are configured as a current mirror and transform the input current, IM1, from a source to a sink. Current IFB is also equal to IO/N, assuming the sizes of transistor 324 and transistor 328 are identical and no scaling takes place. When IO increases due to the load current, ILOAD increasing, the current in transistor 328, IFB, grows in magnitude as well. The increase in IFB causes the voltage at node 230 to become higher because the closed loop dynamics of the voltage feedback force VFB to approximate VREF. The voltage at node 327, i.e., the gate of drive device 308, decreases because transistor 308 has to supply the IFB current. This, in turn, increases the voltage at the output 230 of the regulator 208, which also increases, VO2, the voltage at the load 210. The feedback current, IFB=IO/N, is proportional to the load current, and that relationship tends to minimize variations in the voltage at the load VO2, and compensates for the negative impact of the IR drop due to Rs. As the load current increases, the feedback current, IFB, increases as well. This increase applies more corrective action, thus maintaining a constant voltage at the load VO2. Thus, the voltage regulator 208 includes an autonomous circuit that feeds back a correction signal, IFB, proportional to the amount of output IR drop, to maintain the voltage level of the voltage regulator 208 constant as a function of load current.
The value of N is chosen based on the ratio of RS/R2. The relative size ratio of transistor 308 to transistor 320 is N, therefore, the current IM1 is IO/N. Transistor 324 and transistor 328 mirror current IO/N around and sink it out of the tap point 329 of the resistor network. Current IO and the correction current, IO/N, change directly with the load current ILOAD. For example, when the current ILOAD increases, so do the current IO and IO/N. This increase in current causes the voltage at node 230 to go higher because the negative voltage feedback forces VFB 329 to approximate VREF 319. The voltage at node 327 decreases because transistor 308 has to supply the extra IO/N current; this, in turn, increases the voltage at node 230, which, in turn, keeps the voltage at the load, VO2, constant.
The output from the IC package 202 is taken at node VO2 (power-out pin 232) which is preceded by a series resistance, RS. In the equation for VO2:
V
O2
=V
REF*(R2/R1+1)−(ILOAD*RS)+(IFB*R2)
the feedback current is defined as IFB, the load current is defined as ILOAD, and the voltage gain setting resistors are R2 and R1. To cancel out the affects of RS, the equation, (IFB*R2)−(ILOAD*RS)=0, needs to be valid so VO2 is only dependant on the voltage gain setting resistors and the input reference voltage. The preceding equation yields the ratio (IFB/ILOAD)=(RS/R2), which was previously defined as N. Therefore, based on the RS and R2 values, a current can be determined and fed back to counteract the ill affects of RS 301 on the voltage at the power-out pin 232. In the exemplary embodiment of the voltage regulator 208, the following components have the following values:
RS=1
Resistor R2 312=100K, therefore, N=RS/R2=0.00001
Resistor R1 316=100Kohm
VREF=1.2 v
VO2=2.4 v
The exemplary embodiment of the feedback circuit uses current mirrors, transistors 308 and transistor 320, with a ratio of N to set the feedback current. An alternative embodiment of the feedback circuit uses current mirrors, transistors 324 and transistor 328, with a ratio of M to set the feedback current. A further alternative embodiment of the feedback circuit uses two sets of current mirrors, transistors 308 and transistor 320, with a ratio of N, and current mirrors, transistors 324 and transistor 328, with a ratio of M to set the feedback current, thereby allowing non-integer ratios. The current through the voltage gain setting feedback resistors 312 and 316 are ignored and has little effect on the outcome. With the current feedback circuit defeated VO2 has a magnitude inversely proportional to the load current. With the current feedback circuit active, VO2 effectively remains unchanged, thus achieving voltage regulation. The feedback circuit of the voltage regulator 208 improves load regulation when a resistive path RS 301 is in series with the load 210. The feedback circuit reduces the dependence of output voltage on load current.
The regulator 208 advantageously does not require that the voltage drop at node 238 be placed into a feedback loop of the regulator 208. Therefore, the regulator 208 advantageously does not need the prior art sense pin 182 that is present in known regulators. The elimination of the sense pin 182 contributes to a reduction of size of the IC package 202. Arrow 280 points to an area of an absent sense pin.
In the exemplary embodiment, the IC 201 is fabricated by a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process. In an alternative embodiment, the IC 201 is fabricated using a multiple-oxide complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process. In the alternative embodiment, the IC 201 comprises at least one thin oxide area and at least one thick oxide area. In the alternative embodiment, the regulator 208 is located in a thick oxide area, and the load circuit 210 is located in a thin oxide area. In a further alternative embodiment, the IC 201 uses bipolar transistors.
It should be understood that all circuitry described herein may be implemented either in silicon or another semiconductor material or alternatively by software code representation of silicon or another semiconductor material.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims below.
Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. Any benefits, advantages, or solutions to problems that are described herein with regard to specific embodiments are not intended to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.
Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements.