In hydrocarbon drilling operations, a blowout preventer (“BOP”) is used to form a pressure-tight seal at the top of a well and prevent the escape of formation fluids. A ram BOP achieves pressure control through the operation of hydraulically operated ram blocks. The ram blocks are grouped in opposing pairs and are forced together as a result of the hydraulic operation. Certain types of ram BOPs employ ram blocks designed to shear through pipe in the wellbore (e.g., drillpipe, a liner, or a casing string), hang the pipe off on the ram blocks, and seal the wellbore. Each ram block may include a ram packer designed to form a seal when the ram blocks are brought together. The ram blocks may each have arms that extend in towards the wellbore such that when the ram blocks are brought together, the ram arms mate in a way the resists upward deflection of the ram blocks due to well pressure.
When the ram blocks are brought together to shear a pipe in the wellbore, the pipe has a tendency to flatten before being sheared, effectively increasing the diameter of the pipe. Certain pipes may experience more flattening before being sheared, for example due to an increased wall section thickness. It is desirable to reduce the thickness of the ram arms to provide clearance for the increased effective diameter of the pipe prior to shearing while minimizing the overall form factor of the ram blocks. However, the ram arms experience high loads and reducing the thickness of the ram arms may result in an unacceptable amount of yielding or vertical separation from one another, possibly leading to failure of the BOP.
In one embodiment, a ram block includes an upper ram arm, a lower ram arm, a packer channel, and a packer disposed at least partially within the packer channel. The packer includes a skeletal member that is configured to couple to the upper ram arm and the lower ram arm to oppose vertical separation of the ram arms.
In another embodiment, a ram block includes a ram arm, a packer channel, and a packer disposed at least partially within the packer channel. The packer includes a skeletal member that is configured to couple to an upper ram arm and a lower ram arm of an opposing ram block to oppose vertical separation of the ram arms of the opposing ram block.
In yet another embodiment, a blowout preventer includes a body having a throughbore, a pair of opposing hydraulically actuated ram blocks comprising a first and second ram block. Each of the ram blocks includes a packer channel and a packer disposed at least partially within the packer channel and including a skeletal member. The blowout preventer also includes a ram actuator coupled to each of the ram blocks. The first ram block includes an upper ram arm and a lower ram arm and the skeletal member of the first ram block is configured to couple to the upper ram arm and the lower ram arm to oppose vertical separation of the ram arms. Additionally, the skeletal member of the second ram block is configured to couple to the upper ram arm and the lower ram arm of the first ram block to oppose vertical separation of the ram arms of the first ram block.
For a more detailed description of the embodiments, reference will now be made to the following accompanying drawings:
In the drawings and description that follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. The invention is subject to embodiments of different forms. Some specific embodiments are described in detail and are shown in the drawings, with the understanding that the disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention, and is not intended to limit the invention to the illustrated and described embodiments. The different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results. The terms connect, engage, couple, attach, or any other term describing an interaction between elements is not meant to limit the interaction to direct interaction between the elements and may also include indirect interaction between the elements described. The various characteristics mentioned above, as well as other features and characteristics described in more detail below, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the embodiments, and by referring to the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to
The BOP stack assembly 10 includes a BOP lower marine riser package 18 that connects the riser 16 to a BOP stack package 20. The BOP stack package 20 includes a frame 22, BOPs 23, and accumulators 24 that may be used to provide back up hydraulic fluid pressure for actuating the BOPs 23. In some embodiments, the BOPs 23 are ram-type BOPs, such as those shown in
Referring now to
Turning now to
As explained above, when the ram blocks are actuated, the side cutout 304 between the ram arms 306, 308 receives a ram arm of the opposing ram block 20 in a tongue and groove type interface. This interface strengthens the links between the ram blocks 202, 204 and helps prevent upward lateral deflection of the ram blocks in response to contained wellbore pressure. However, as explained above, there are advantages to minimizing the size of the ram arms 306, 308. For example, to allow the ram blocks 202, 204 to shear larger diameter pipes 206 without the flattened pipe interfering with the ram arms 306, 308, which could prevent the ram blocks 202, 204 from closing completely and cause the BOP 23 to fail.
One skilled in the art appreciates that reducing the size of the ram arms 306, 308 may reduce their resistance to fatigue. Additionally, the ram arms must still contain wellbore pressure as well as withstand force generated by the increase in pressure caused by the packers of each ram block 202, 204 coming together. Furthermore, while increasing the length of the ram arms 306, 308 provides a more robust tongue and groove connection, it also reduces the fatigue resistance as a result of the cantilevered nature of the ram arms 306, 308. This combination of factors increases the likelihood that the ram arms 306, 308 vertically separate (i.e., that the ram arm 306 is forced laterally upward relative to the ram arm 308 and that the ram arm 308 is forced laterally downward relative to the ram arm 306). Again, this lateral separation is a product of both the wellbore pressure and the force generated by the packers of each ram block 202, 204 coming together.
Referring now to
Additionally, the skeletal member 404 may couple to the ram arms 306, 308 in many ways.
The packer 506 includes a skeletal member 508. As shown, the packer 506 is molded around the skeletal member 508; however, in other embodiments, the skeletal member 508 surrounds the packer 506 and serves to contain the packer 506. In some embodiments, and as shown in
While specific embodiments have been shown and described, modifications can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or teaching of this invention. The embodiments as described are exemplary only and are not limiting. Many variations and modifications are possible and are within the scope of the invention. For example, the disclosed interaction between the skeletal members and the ram arms is intended to apply to any support structure that is integrated into a packer to resist forces acting on cantilevered portions of a ram block. As another example, the coupling between the skeletal structure and the ram arms may take many different forms other than those mentioned above. Still further, it is not necessary that both of a set of ram blocks include the described skeletal structure. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited to the embodiments described, but is only limited by the claims that follow, the scope of which shall include all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3817326 | Meynier, III | Jun 1974 | A |
4076208 | Olson | Feb 1978 | A |
4313496 | Childs et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4323256 | Miyagishima et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4580626 | Jones | Apr 1986 | A |
5515916 | Haley | May 1996 | A |
6244336 | Kachich | Jun 2001 | B1 |
7354026 | Urrutia | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7703739 | Judge et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20030024705 | Whitby et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040066003 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060021749 | Schaeper | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20100243926 | Weir | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/052867, dated Dec. 14, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130062540 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |