Not Applicable.
The present invention relates, in general, to a load sharing mechanism for power transmissions and in particular to a load sharing mechanism for gear transmission with stepped gears.
Rotary wing aircraft typically uses high-speed turbine engine to drive the rotor or propeller. A main gear transmission between the engine the rotor is necessary to transmit engine power while reducing the engine speed to the appropriate rotor speed. The main gear transmission is usually the heaviest subsystem in the drive train of the aircraft. Increasing power throughput and reducing the weight of the transmission is very desirable for modern rotary wing aircraft.
One effective way to improve power density is to divide the input torque from the gas turbine engine into multiple paths. Each path uses a smaller individual gear member which leads to an overall transmission design that is lighter in weight, compact in size and has smaller gear face width due to the lower loads in each gear mesh. The smaller but numerous gears also require smaller bearings which have increased life span due to less applied torque.
One embodiment of a power dense planetary gear transmission consists of a compound planetary gear-train having a set of stepped planet gears. Each stepped planet gear includes a large planet gear and a small drive planet pinion. The stepped planet gears may have flexible or pivot-able shaft. A set of small and simple idler planet pinions supported by a planet carrier are employed to share the torque, distributing load carried by the transmission among the drive planet pinions and the idler planet pinions. The idler planet pinions have non-floating shaft with respect to the planet carrier.
Alternative transmission configurations such as split-torque face gear transmission may also be utilized, where a stepped gear is used to drive a primary face gears and two idler face gears that sandwich the primary face gear. The stepped gears have fixed shaft. Small idler gears were used as crossover gears to provide multiple power paths to share the load. Similarly, the idler gears also have fixed shafts.
Load sharing mechanisms may be disposed within a power dense planetary gear transmission. These load sharing mechanisms may include a stepped gear cluster having a large gear and a small drive gear. The small drive gear meshes with two reaction gears, and the load sharing is achieved through a mechanical mechanism where a support structure of stepped gear cluster is devised utilizing a single pivoting support bearing which is selectively positioned between the large and small gears of the stepped gear cluster. The support structure and position of the pivoting support bearing allows the tangential forces of the small drive planet gear at mesh points with two reaction gears to be partitioned to achieve a desired load sharing ratio between the two reaction gears edge loading may occur if the gear teeth were not properly crowned.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a flexible support structure in a gear transmission that allows for partitioning of a load between two reaction gears as desired, and for partitioning of a load between cluster support bearings to optimize the load distribution among drive planet pinions and idler planet pinions, and to maintain parallel gear engagement. In doing so, the maximum load capacity can be achieved.
Briefly stated, the present disclosure provides a power dense planetary gear transmission with a flexible support structure that allows a load to be split between two reaction gears as desired, and between a set of cluster support bearings to optimize the load distribution among drive planet pinions and idler planet pinions, maintaining proper parallel gear alignment for maximum load capacity.
In an alternate embodiment, the present disclosure provides a face gear transmission with a flexible support structure that allows a load to be split between two reaction gears as desired, and between a set of cluster support bearings to optimize the load distribution among drive planet pinions and idler planet pinions, maintaining proper parallel gear alignment for maximum load capacity.
As a method, the present disclosure provides a procedure for selectively positioning a set of support bearings to achieve an optimized load distribution among drive planet pinions and idler planet pinions in a transmission system incorporating a split gear assembly for splitting an applied load between two reaction gears or pathways.
The foregoing features, and advantages set forth in the present disclosure as well as presently preferred embodiments will become more apparent from the reading of the following description in connection with the accompanying drawings.
In the accompanying drawings which form part of the specification:
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several figures of the drawings. It is to be understood that the drawings are for illustrating the concepts set forth in the present disclosure and are not to scale.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings.
The following detailed description illustrates the invention by way of example and not by way of limitation. The description enables one skilled in the art to make and use the present disclosure, and describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives, and uses of the present disclosure, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the present disclosure.
Turning to the figures, and to
The drive gear 10, driven via an associated bevel gear 1 and ring gear 5, defines a first axis of rotation AR1, while each of the stepped cluster gears 20 defines an associated second axis of rotation AR2. The two axis of rotation AR1 and AR2 define a plane S. The two gears in each stepped cluster gear 20 are spaced apart axially along the axis AR2 by a distance L, as seen in
The power dense gear transmission further includes a set of idler gears 70. Each idler gear 70 is straddle mounted on a common support structure (planet carrier) 60 through a third bearing 80 and a fourth bearing 90. The third bearing 80 is located axially at a distance L3 from the center of the idler gear 70. The fourth bearing 90 is located axially at a distance L4 from the center of the idler bearing 70. At the third bearing position, the third bearing 80, along with an associated housing structure in the planet carrier, provides effective tangential support stiffness Klt3. At the fourth bearing position, the fourth bearing 90, along with an associated housing structure in the planet carrier, provides effective tangential support stiffness Klt4
During operation of the transmission (A), the drive gear 10 meshes with the large gear 21 of each cluster gear 20, exerting a meshing force that has a tangential component F0 perpendicular to the plane S defined by the axis AR1 and AR2. The first reaction gear 30 meshes with the small drive pinion gear 22 at the same side to axis AR1 as does the drive gear 10. The mesh between the reaction gear 30 and the small drive pinion gear 22 generates a meshing force that has a tangential component F perpendicular to the plane S. The second reaction gear 40 meshes with the small drive pinion gear 22 on the opposite side from the first reaction gear 30. The mesh between the second reaction gear 40 and the small drive pinion gear generates a meshing force which has a tangential component F+ΔF, similarly perpendicular to the plane S.
The meshing forces acting on the stepped cluster gear 20 are balanced by resulting forces in support bearings 50 and 55, as shown in the load diagram of
The first reaction gear 30 also meshes with the idler gears 70, transferring the tangential meshing force F to the idler gears 70. In doing so, the reaction gear 30 is rotationally balanced. Each idler gear 70, in turn further meshes with the second reaction gear 40, generating a matching tangential meshing force F to rotationally balance the tangential meshing force F received from the first reaction gear 30. In doing so, the third bearing 80 receives a tangential load Ft3, and the fourth bearing 90 receives a tangential load of Ft4, best seen in
To partition the tangential meshing forces at the mesh with two reaction gears 30 and 40, while maintaining the various gears in parallel engagement, bearing positions L1 and L2 supporting the stepped gear 20 are carefully selected. Assuming that the desired ratio of the tangential meshing force generated between the first reaction gear 30 and the small drive pinion gear 22, relative to the tangential meshing force generated between the second reaction gear 40 and the small drive pinion gear 22 is:
The bearing tangential force ratio of the second bearing 50 to the first bearing 55 is:
Correspondingly, for the idler gears, the bearing tangential force ratio of the fourth bearing 90 to the third bearing 80 is:
To achieve equilibrium or rotational balance, the following relationships have to be met
where:
D0 is the radius of the mesh circle to the large gear 21;
D1 is the radius of the mesh circle of the small drive pinion gear 22;
L1 is the center distance from large gear 21 to the first support bearing 55;
L2 is the center distance from the small drive pinion gear 22 to the second support bearing 50;
L3 is the center distance from the idler gear 70 to the third bearing 80; and
L4 is the center distance from the idler gear 70 to the fourth bearing 90 (see
Under tangential load, the center of the first bearing 55 experiences tangential displacement by amount equal to:
Similarly, the center of the second bearing 50 experiences a tangential displacement of an amount equal to:
To keep the cluster gear 20 properly aligned, minimizing both gear mesh misalignment, and edge loading, it is desirable to have SDt1=SDt2. This leads to the following relationship:
It is further desirable to have both Ft1 and Ft2 in the same direction to reduce bearing load. This is to say:
φ21≧0 (Eqn. 9)
Under a tangential load Ft3, the center of the third bearing 70 experiences tangential displacement of the amount:
Under tangential load Ft4, the center of the forth bearing 80, experiences tangential displacement of the amount:
To keep the idler gear 70 properly aligned, minimizing both gear mesh misalignment and edge loading, it is desirable to have Slt3=Slt4. This leads to:
To maintain integrity of gearing system SDt1=SDt2=Slt3=Slt4 (Eqn. 13) must hold true, thus:
or:
where:
The following procedure implements the above relationships into the design process for a gear transmission (A) that incorporates a load sharing mechanism as presented in the current disclosure:
Step 1—Determine a load partitioning ratio LRT of the two reaction gears 30 and 40 using Eqn. (1), and determine bearing load partitioning ratios using Eqn. (2) and Eqn. (3); determine a cluster gear pitch diameter ratio using Eqn. (16).
Step 2—Select the bearings and their initial positions (L1, L2, L3, and L4) using Eqn. (4) and Eqn. (5); design and engineer bearings and supporting structures such as the planet carrier to achieve predetermined support stiffness (force) ratios; calculate and check actual support stiffness (force) ratios using Eqn. (8), Eqn. (12) and Eqn. (14). Iteratively repeat the design and engineering process, if necessary until actual support stiffness (force) ratios for the bearings which are within an acceptable tolerance of the predetermined support stiffness ratios are achieved.
Step 3—Calculate and check the actual gear load partitioning ratios using Eqn. (15), iteratively, and adjust using the previous step or step(s), if necessary, until a gear loading partitioning ratio which is within an acceptable tolerance of a predetermined gear load partitioning ratio is achieved.
Step 4—Chose and adjust support bearing positions (L1, L2, L3, and L4) using Eqn. (4) and Eqn. (5) together with the actual support stiffness ratios and gear load partitioning ratio(s).
The above process may be used alone, or along with other procedures, such as specifically configured planet carrier structures, to yield desirable solutions and design configurations having the required support stiffness.
The load sharing concepts of the present disclosure may be utilized, for example, in a helicopter main gear box as seen at (A1) in
For each of the idler planet gears, the third support bearing 180, and the fourth support bearing 190, with their respective housing structures in the planet carrier 160, provide rigid supports in the tangential direction. This allows the drive planet gears 122 to float more easily than the idler planet gears 170 in the annular space between idler sun gear 130 and fixed ring gear 140, facilitating a transfer of a portion of the applied loads through a second power path. That is to say, the third and fourth bearing positions provide stiffer support for the idler planet gears than the first and second bearing positions provide for the drive planet gears.
As can be appreciated, the gear teeth of each drive planet gear 122 are subjected to uni-directional bending, while the gear teeth of the idler planet gears 170 are subjected to bi-directional bending. The maximum tangential force for the drive planet 122 is F+ΔF and the maximum tangential force for idler planet gear 170 is F. To maintain equal safety margin against gear tooth bending failure, it is highly desirable to have the idler planet gears 170 transmitting less tangential force than the drive planet gears 122. That is to say:
In practical application, it is recommended to have a load partitioning ratio LRT between 0.5 and 1.0. The endurance limiting stress for a reverse bending gear tooth is roughly 70% of the endurance limiting stress for a unidirectional bending gear tooth. Thus, the load partitioning ratio LRT=0.7 is suggested. For practical considerations, it is desirable to adopt an equal tangential load partition between the first bearing 155 and the second bearing 150, and between the third bearing 180 and the fourth bearing 190. That is φ21=1 and φ43=1.
Consequently, the stiffness relationships at the first, second, third and the fourth bearing positions are determined as:
The locations for the first and second bearings and for the third and fourth bearings along the respective axis about which they rotate are then determined as:
Turning to the
For example, an alternate embodiment of the planet carrier structure for obtaining the desired support stiffness relationship is shown at 400 in
Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the load sharing mechanisms of the present disclosure are not limited to use in the planetary gear systems shown in
The large gear 321 of the drive cluster gear 320 meshes with, and is driven by an input drive gear 310, which in turn is coupled to an input shaft 305 and driving engine (not shown). The small drive gear 322 of the drive cluster gear 320 is sandwiched between, and meshes with, both the idler face gear 330, supported on bearings 395 relative to the housing, and the primary face gear 340. Similarly, the idler pinion 370 is sandwiched between, and meshed with, both the idler face gear 330 and the primary face gear 340. The rotational axis of the input gear AR1, the rotational axis of the drive cluster gear 320 AR2, and the rotational axis of the idler and primary face gears AR3 each lie in a common plane S.
During operation, input power is transmitted from the input shaft 305 to the output shaft 365 through the split-torque face gear transmission. The power is split at the small drive gear 322, with portion being delivered directly to the primary face gear 340, and portion being delivered to the idler face gear 330. The idler pinion 370 then acts as a crossover gear, passing the power back from the idler face gear 330 to the primary gear 340. In doing so, the driving power is re-combined at the primary face gear 340 to drive the output shaft 365.
The amount of power split between the idler face gear 330 and the primary face gear 340 is determined, among other factors, by the positions of the bearings (350, 355, 380, and 390) along with the associated tangential support stiffness at the bearing positions. The relationships set forth in above Equations (1)-(22) are applicable to this embodiment, and may be utilized to selectively position the bearings to achieve the desired power split. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that when applied to a split-torque face gear transmission, any radial dimensions referred to previously in Equations (1)-(22) should interpreted as axial directions.
Other variations and applications of the current disclosure are possible without deviating from the sprit of the disclosure. The embodiments and application disclosed herein should be considered as ways of explaining and implementing, not as ways of limiting the scope of the current disclosure. As various changes could be made in the above constructions without departing from the scope of the disclosure, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
The present application is related to, and claims priority from, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/323,648 filed on Apr. 13, 2010, and International Application PCT/US2011/032229 filed Apr. 13, 2011 and published under International Publication No. WO 2011/130352, by Ai et al. for “Load Split Mechanism for Gear Transmission”, both of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/032229 | 4/13/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/11/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/130352 | 10/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6966865 | Drago et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7507180 | Robuck | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8287422 | Tseng | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20040259678 | Stille et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049107 | Willmot et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188520 | Simon | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT application PCT/US2011/032229 mailed Jun. 24, 2011. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT application PCT/US2011/032229. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130035194 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61323648 | Apr 2010 | US |