Embodiments of the system relate generally to a field of voltage regulation and more specifically to a load tap changer for power delivery.
Electricity is supplied to consumers through a power grid at a very high voltage to reduce energy losses during transmission. The increasing use of distributed and renewable-based generation in the power grid requires more flexibility in network voltage regulation. Transformers have been classically used to scale the network voltage allowing efficient transmission and distribution of power. Nevertheless, their use as a tool for voltage regulation was limited mainly due to the large cost implications, which did not match the otherwise relatively lower cost of power transformers.
For regulating the output voltage of transformers, on-load and off-load tap changers are available in the market. Off-load tap changers are low cost, but require disconnecting the entire load from the transformer prior to each single operation. There are two types of on-load tap changers, mechanical and electronic. Mechanical on-load tap changers allow for in-service operation, but have demanding mechanical requirements making the tap changer large, heavy, and expensive. The maintenance requirements of mechanical components in mechanical on-load tap changers limit the number of tap changes allowed in a lifetime of the tap changer. For this reason, their use is limited to relatively few points in the network, and to a slow voltage variation correction.
The main drawback of mechanical on-load tap changers is unavoidable arcing between two contact terminals when a tap is changed. Electronic on-load tap changers on the other hand do have mechanical contacts but reduce the arcing during tap changing operation by use of semiconductor devices which further reduce maintenance requirements as compared to mechanical on-load tap changers. However, electronic on-load tap changers have higher cost due to the cost of semiconductor switches utilized in the tap changers.
For these and other reasons, there is a need for an improved load tap changer.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a load tap changer is provided. The load tap changer includes a mechanical switch connected to a power terminal of a voltage conversion device to carry an electric current and activated to switch from a first tap to a second tap of the voltage conversion device when a tap change signal is received. The load tap changed further includes a semiconductor switch connected between the first tap and the power terminal of the voltage conversion device when the tap change signal is received and disconnected before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap. The load tap changer also includes an impedance branch or an uncontrolled semiconductor switch connected between the second tap and the power terminal of the voltage conversion device before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap and the impedance or the uncontrolled semiconductor switch is disconnected after the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method of operating a load tap changer is provided. The method includes activating a mechanical switch connected to a power terminal of a voltage conversion device to shift from a first tap to a second tap of the voltage conversion device when a tap change signal is received and connecting a semiconductor switch between the first tap and the power terminal of the voltage conversion device when the tap change signal is received. The method also includes disconnecting the semiconductor switch before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap connecting an impedance branch or an uncontrolled semiconductor switch between the second tap and the output terminal of the voltage conversion device before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap. The method further includes disconnecting the impedance branch or the uncontrolled semiconductor switch after the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method of operating a load tap changer is provided. The method includes transferring an electric current flowing in a mechanical switch connected between a first tap and an output terminal of a voltage conversion device to a first branch including a semiconductor switch and diverting the electric current flowing in the first branch to a second branch including an impedance component or an uncontrolled semiconductor switch. The method also includes transferring the electric current flowing in the second branch to the mechanical switch connected between a second tap and the power terminal.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, a load tap changer is provided. The load tap changer includes a mechanical switch connected to a power terminal of a voltage conversion device to carry an electric current and activated to switch from a first tap to a second tap of the voltage conversion device when a tap change signal is received. The load tap changer also includes an impedance branch or an uncontrolled semiconductor switch connected between the first tap and the power terminal of the voltage conversion device when the tap change signal is received and disconnected before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap. The load tap changer further includes a semiconductor switch connected between the second tap and the power terminal of the voltage conversion device before the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap, wherein the semiconductor switch is disconnected after the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
As used herein, the terms “controller” or “module” refers to software, hardware, or firmware, or any combination of these, or any system, process, or functionality that performs or facilitates the processes described herein.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present invention, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
The invention includes embodiments that relate to a load tap changer utilized for a voltage regulation by changing connections from one tap to another of a voltage conversion device. Though the present discussion provides examples in the context of the load tap changer for a transformer, these load tap changers can be applied to any other voltage conversion or regulation device.
When a controller (not shown) detects variations in voltages it activates a tap operation. In general, transformer output voltage Vo is given as:
Vo=Vin*(T2/T1) (1)
where T2 are secondary winding turns and T1 are primary winding turns. The taps 14 on secondary winding 16 decides the number of turns T2. Thus, if output voltage Vo needs to be increased, taps 14 are changed such that winding turns T2 will increase. Similarly, when output voltage Vo needs to be decreased, taps 14 are changed appropriately to decrease turns T2.
Mechanical on-load tap changer 18 which includes a mechanical switch 20 and switching resistors 22 is utilized to change taps 14 from one position to another position. For changing the taps from one position to another, mechanical on-load tap changer 18 utilizes a drive system (not shown) and rotates mechanical switch 20 and switching resistors 22 anticlockwise or clockwise depending on the voltage change requirement. During the movement, at first one of the switching resistors 22 makes contact with the next tap while mechanical switch 20 is still in contact with the present tap. Then mechanical switch 20 is open circuited i.e., mechanical switch 20 is not connected to any tap, whereas the second switching resistor 22 makes connection with the present tap. This results in short circuit between two taps 14 through two switching resistors 22. Finally, mechanical switch 20 contacts the next tap and then both switching resistors 22 are open circuited completing the tap change operation. The complete tap change operation results in significant energy losses in switching resistors 22 and also related heat generation and maintenance issues.
Semiconductor switch 44 may be an unidirectional semiconductor switch which allows current to flow only in one direction or a bidirectional semiconductor switch i.e., a switch which allows passage of current in either direction. Examples of the unidirectional semiconductor switch include a thyristor and a gate turn off thyristor (GTOs), whereas examples of the bidirectional semiconductor switch include a thyristor pair connected in antiparallel configuration and a triode for alternating current (TRIAC). In one embodiment, when semiconductor switch 44 is an unidirectional semiconductor switch, it can be turned ON during a forward bias condition. In another embodiment, the entire tap change operation is performed within a time duration of an alternating current (AC) voltage cycle. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art the forward bias condition occurs when an anode of the unidirectional semiconductor switch is connected to a positive voltage and a cathode of the unidirectional semiconductor switch is connected to a negative voltage. When semiconductor switch 44 is a bidirectional semiconductor switch, it can be turned ON in any half cycle of the AC voltage.
In one embodiment, electronic on-load tap changer 42 may be movable and its movement from one tap to another is controlled by a motor drive (not shown). Further, a controller 60 is utilized to control the operation of semiconductor switch 44, mechanical switch 46 and impedance branch 48. Furthermore, impedance branch 48 may include a resistor, an inductor, a capacitor or any combination thereof. The use of inductor in the impedance branch 48 reduces a current magnitude and also losses in the resistor. The design parameters of impedance branch 48 include a peak current and current ripple in impedance branch 48, voltage across impedance branch 48, and a time that is required to connect and disconnect the impedance branch.
In step 2 (
In one embodiment, the connection and disconnection instance of mechanical switch 46 is based on a zero crossing of a voltage waveform or a current (near zero crossing) waveform passing through impedance branch 48 so as to reduce the voltage on mechanical switch 46 at the time of its connection to any tap. In one embodiment, mechanical switch 46 is connected or disconnected near the zero crossing of the voltage waveform or the current waveform.
In another embodiment, at step 5 when bypass branch 75 includes uncontrolled semiconductor switch 74, semiconductor switch 44 is gated OFF shortly after the uncontrolled semiconductor switch 74 is connected. The connection of uncontrolled semiconductor 74 occurs when it is reverse biased. Therefore, at the next current zero crossing the load current transfers from the semiconductor switch 44, which is now gated OFF, to the uncontrolled semiconductor switch 74, which is now forward biased. In this way the current transfer between the branches is smooth and with minimal overlapping. In general, controller 60 utilizes a mechanism to detect when any of the components (semiconductor switch 44, uncontrolled semiconductor switch 74 and mechanical switch 46) are in a correct mode for commuting the current and send gate signals accordingly. In one embodiment, this mechanism can be based on pre-determined times. In another embodiment, the connection and disconnection of bypass branch 75 and semiconductor switch 44 may be reversed as explained in following paragraphs.
In step 2 (
At step 104, the electric current flowing in the first branch is diverted to a second branch which includes either an impedance component or an uncontrolled semiconductor switch. The process of diverting the electric current to the second branch includes first connecting the second branch to the second tap and then gating OFF or disconnecting the semiconductor switch from the first tap. Finally at step 106, the electric current is transferred back to the mechanical switch which is now connected between the second tap and the power terminal. In this step, first the mechanical switch is connected to the second tap and then the second branch is disconnected from the second tap.
One of the advantages of the proposed on-load tap changer is significant maintenance reduction. Further the on-load tap changer has higher efficiency because of lower losses in the impedance branch and semiconductor devices and the components utilized are minimal resulting in lower cost.
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3581188 | Watanabe et al. | May 1971 | A |
3662253 | Yamamoto | May 1972 | A |
5408171 | Eitzmann et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5604424 | Shuttleworth | Feb 1997 | A |
6472851 | Hammond | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6856122 | Dohnal et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7099169 | West et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7333349 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7355369 | Lavieville et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7436155 | Renken | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7595614 | Stich et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8519682 | Oates et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8576038 | Kraemer et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20040032699 | Dohnal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20090146637 | Stich et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090230933 | Oates et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110005910 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110102056 | Brueckl et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120032654 | Brueckl et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120306471 | Green et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101958195 | Jan 2011 | CN |
2011033254 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
N.F. Mailah et al., “Microcontroller Based Semiconductor Tap Changer for Power Transformer,” IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference3, Jun. 23-26, 2003, 6 pages. |
G.H. Cooke et al., “New thyristor assisted diverter switch for on load transformer tap changers,” IEE Proceedings-B, vol. 139, No. 6, Nov. 1992, pp. 507-511. |
D. J. Rogers et al., “A Hybrid Diverter Design for Distribution Level On-load Tap Changers,” IEEE 978-1-4244-5287-3. 2010. pp. 1493-1500. |
J. Arrillaga et al., “A Static Alternative to the Transformer On-Load Tap-Changer,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-99, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1980, pp. 86-91. |
D. Dohnal, “On-Load Tap-Changers for Power Transformers a Technical Digest, MR Publication,” Jun. 26, 2006, pp. 1-28. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140055225 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |