The present invention relates to a load torque blocking device for automatically blocking load-side torques, according to the preamble of claim 1.
The large number of known load torque blocking devices includes a group in which the physical blocking effect is based on a clamping or tilting principle, and it is not important that the principle be clearly definable as either clamping or tilting.
Within this group, it is known from U.S. Pat. No. 6,229,233 B1 to locate several clamping rollers on the circumference of a frame-mounted drum of a load blocking clutch, which are moved by a drive part into a neutral position and, when a load torque is produced that exceeds the drive torque, they are pressed by the ramps of a driven part against the wall of the drum. In that position, they create a jam between the driven part and the drum, thereby enabling the clutch to block load torques of this type. When the clamping rollers are in the neutral position, they are located loosely between the driven part and the housing during normal operation, and they are held axially only by a spring. As such, they often produce undesired noises during normal operation.
Furthermore, publication WO 03/054409 makes known a load torque blocking device, with which several clamping bolts bear against both sides of a frame-mounted blocking ring wall. The clamping bolts are displaceable via a blocking disk using drive means or driven means such that, when driven-side torque is produced, they tilt against the blocking ring walls and block the rotational motion. When drive-side torque is produced, they disengage from the blocking ring walls. Since the clamping bolts are located on a relatively large radius beyond the drive and driven shafts—which are aligned with each other—on the blocking ring wall that is enclosed by a housing, a large installation space is required for this system; this can be problematic, particularly in terms of vehicle design.
The aim of the present invention is to develop a system that fulfills all of the original objectives of a load torque blocking device, only some of which are performed more or less well by the known systems. The objectives include a high state of blocking readiness, a favorable relationship between the blockable torque and the amount of installation space required, and minimal power loss when the drive-side driving force occurs in either direction of rotation. A further objective is to realize a load torque blocking device that is also particularly quiet-running and therefore reduces the noises that are produced when the driving force occurs on the drive side.
The inventive load torque blocking device with the features listed in the characterizing part of claim 1 has the advantage that it enables realization of a particularly compact design given that the engaging means of the drive shaft extend axially into the central openings of the clamping bodies. A further advantage of the inventive solution is that the compact design and the arrangement of the clamping bodies in the center of the load torque blocking device largely prevents centrifugal forces from acting on the clamping bodies. As a result, such a means of attaining the object of the invention can also be used preferably for fast-running drives, e.g., electric motors, to drive displacement systems that include components that move back and forth.
Advantageous refinements and improvements of the features indicated in claim 1 are made possible by the measures listed in the subclaims. To attain a design with the shortest possible axial length, it is advantageous to design the clamping bodies as clamping rings, into the through-holes of each which one of the two projections of the drive shaft extends with rotational angular play.
To attain the best possible blocking of load torques despite the compact design, it is provided in a refinement of the present invention that the inner wall of the housing opening and the outer wall of the two clamping rings both have two adjacently located, conically extending clamping surfaces that are positioned relative to each other in the shape of a V. As a result, the clamping rings are pressed against the inner wall of the frame-mounted housing in a wedge-like manner, thereby allowing high load torques to also be absorbed by the housing without deforming the housing. To ensure that the clamping that occurs on all clamping surfaces is as uniform as possible, it is advantageous to separate the V-shape-positioned clamping surfaces from each other using a cylindrical surface shell. Since these cylindrical surface shells are not clamping surfaces, they can be used for other purposes. It is particularly advantageous, for example, to provide the clamping rings with a groove-shaped recess on the outer circumference, in the region of their cylindrical surface shell, into which a leg of the two-legged spring element inserted between the extension of the driven shaft and the clamping rings engages. The recess is dimensioned such that the leg of the spring element is located therein with no radial overhang. This means of attaining the object of the present invention has the additional advantage that the power produced by high lock-up torques flows exclusively over the V-shape-positioned clamping surfaces or over the cylindrical surface shells, thereby decoupling the spring element from this power flow. At the same time, however, the spring force of the legs continues to act on both clamping rings. It is therefore ensured that the clamping rings are ready to perform blocking in any operating state.
Since the driven shaft extends, via an axially protruding extension, into the housing opening in a chord-like manner in the circumferential region of the housing opening, and it is operatively connected there with the clamping rings, it is provided, in order to minimize imbalance, that at least one axial through-hole—and, preferably, several adjacently located through-holes—is provided in this extension of the driven shaft. It is particularly advantageous to provide the central through-hole with a radially inwardly pointing opening in which an eyelet-shaped, central section of the spring element is displaceably accommodated.
Given that, according to the present invention, the peg-shaped projections of the drive shaft engage in the openings of the clamping bodies or clamping rings, empty installation space is attained in the housing of the load torque blocking device on the side of the two clamping rings that is diametrically opposite to the driven shaft extension. In a refinement of the present invention, this empty installation space can be used advantageously to loosely position a guide element in the housing opening, which bears against the inner wall of the housing opening and the outer walls of the two clamping rings. The guide element advantageously has a triangular contour, and it lies flat—via a convex outer side—against the inner wall of the housing, and flat—via two symmetrical, concave inner sides that point toward the housing center—against the outer surfaces of one of the two clamping rings. In this case as well, the convex outer side of the guide element is also advantageously provided with two V-shaped surfaces that are matched with the clamping surfaces of the inner wall of the housing, and with an intermediate, cylindrical section; the two concave inner sides of the guide element also have two V-shaped surfaces that are matched with the clamping surfaces of the clamping rings, with a cylindrical section located between them.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the concave surfaces of the guide element extend past the region of the contact point of the clamping rings with each other, and they include, in this region, a connecting window, in which the two clamping rings bear against each other. The V-shaped positioning of the clamping surfaces and the outer sides of the guide element results in a compact design and an axial centering of the clamping rings and the guide element in the housing. As a result, additional axial, counter-rotational supports are not required. The system therefore has very little frictional loss when the driving force occurs on the drive side, and it has a high state of blocking readiness. In addition, due to the guide element, the movement of the clamping rings—which must take place when the driving force occurs on the drive side—is stabilized, thereby resulting in particularly smooth, low-noise operation. Furthermore, due to the proposed design and positioning of the spring element in the system, it is ensured that the spring element continues to introduce force in the center as desired in order to preload the clamping rings, even when vibrating accelerations occur.
The present invention is explained below in greater detail, as an example, with reference to the attached drawing.
a shows the load torque blocking device while blocked in the clockwise direction,
b shows an enlarged section of
c shows the path of the force vectors that occur during blocking, and
As shown in
The two clamping rings 14 are positioned eccentrically and adjacently in housing opening 18. They bear via their outer surfaces 14a against inner wall 18a of the housing opening and against each other. They are held in their neutral position depicted in
Each of the clamping rings 14 has an opening designed as a through-hole 27, into which an engaging means of drive shaft 13 extends axially. The engaging means of drive shaft 13 are formed by two peg-shaped projections 28 positioned eccentrically on the end face of drive shaft end section 12a, the diameter D of which is smaller than opening width W of through-holes 27 of clamping rings 14, and which do not touch clamping rings 14 when they are in the neutral position depicted in
Extension 19 of driven shaft 13, which projects into housing opening 18, has a curved circumferential surface 19a on its outside that is matched to housing opening 18. On the inner side of extension 19, which faces the center of housing opening 18, a pressing surface 29 is provided for each of the two clamping rings 14, each of which can be brought to bear against a cylindrical surface shell 25 of a clamping ring 14.
Guide element 16 is located in the lower open space in housing opening 18 that remains in the circumferential direction between the two clamping rings 14. It has a triangular contour and bears via a convex outer side flatly against inner wall 18a of the housing. The outer side of guide element 16 is formed by two guide surfaces 30 that are positioned in the shape of a V and are matched via convex curvature with housing 11 such that they bear loosely against clamping surfaces 22 of housing 11, which have a matching convex curvature. The two concave, symmetrically positioned inner sides 16b—that point toward the center of the housing—also have two guide surfaces 31 that are also positioned in the shape of a V and have a concave curvature such that they bear flat and loosely against corresponding clamping surfaces 24 of clamping rings 14. Guide surfaces 30 and 31—that are situated in pairs and are positioned conically relative to each other—are also separated by an intermediate, cylindrical section 30a, 31a. Since triangular guide element 16 has a symmetrical design, the two clamping rings 14 are accommodated and guided in the same geometric shapes of guide element 16. Concave guide surfaces 31 of guide element 16 extend past the region of contact point 34 of clamping rings 14 with each other so far that regions of guide surfaces 31 and their cylindrical sections 31a intersect in the plane of symmetry of guide element 16 and form a connecting window 32 in this region, in which the two clamping rings 14 bear against each other. The contact between clamping rings 14 in the region of their cylindrical surface shell 25 that is required to block a load torque is therefore made possible. Guide element 16 therefore encloses regions of clamping rings 14 with slight clearance. Lubricant films can form in the resultant gaps between guide surfaces 30 and 31 of guide element 16 and clamping surfaces 22 and 24 of housing 11 and clamping rings 14 when grease is applied.
The mode of operation of load torque blocking device 10 will be explained in greater detail, below.
The mode of operation of load torque blocking device 10 that occurs when torque acts on the drive side to transfer a force will now be explained with reference to
As a result of the symmetrical design of load torque blocking device 10 with the symmetrical design of the two clamping rings 14, the load torque blocking device functions in the same manner in both directions of rotation of the drive shaft and driven shaft. As a result, when a drive torque acts in the clockwise direction, the left, peg-shaped projection 28 of drive shaft 13 becomes operatively connected with left clamping ring 14 and presses it against left pressing surface 29 of axial extension 19. The system then rotates in the clockwise direction in housing 11 and transfers the drive torque to the driven side. The function of load torque blocking device 10 that occurs when a load torque is applied in the clockwise direction will now be explained with reference to
The following points about tilting are depicted graphically in
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
In contrast to normal cylindrical, free-wheeling rollers, different clamping angles K1 and K2 relative to the center of clamping rings 14 occur with current clamping rings 14, via their conical, axially symmetrical clamping surfaces 24 positioned in the shape of a V, and by the fact that they bear against each other at their cylindrical surface shells 25. The reason for this is the fact that the radii that start at the center of the clamping rings and extend to contact points 39 on housing 11, and to contact point 34, are different. If it is assumed that the friction angles 5 that occur at contact points 39 and contact point 34 are the same, the larger clamping angle of the two must be smaller than maximum friction angle ζmax for clamping rings 14 to clamp securely. The following therefore applies:
K1<K2<ζmax
Otherwise, clamping rings 14 would be driven by extension 19 of driven shaft 13, and they would not tilt.
It is permissible to overlook the remaining spring force of spring element 15, since it merely supports the clamping or tilting. In the manner shown, rotational motions introduced on the driven side are blocked, and driven shaft 13 is fixed in position. Likewise, drive shaft 12 is protected against driven-side torques, since they are deflected toward housing 11 and are not transferred further via projections 28 to drive shaft 12. Due to clamping surfaces 22 and 24, which are positioned relative to each other in the shape of a V, it is possible to block substantially greater torques with this load torque blocking device 10 than with cylindrical free-wheeling rollers, since a portion of the forces applied to housing 11 point in both axial directions, thereby reducing radial propagation on housing 11.
Due to the symmetrical design and positioning of the components of this load torque blocking device 10, load torques are absorbed by housing 11 in the same manner for both directions of rotation of driven shaft 13. For example, when a load torque is applied in the counterclockwise direction, axial projection 19 of driven shaft 13 presses against the left clamping ring, blocking force Ps is produced there, and the two clamping rings 14 block the rotational motion by tilting.
To attain a compact design of load torque blocking device 10, it is essential that, when the clamping bodies are designed in the shape of clamping rings 14, open space be created for the peg-shaped projections 28 on the drive shaft. The space required for the new guide element 16 was therefore also created inside housing opening 18 at the same time. Guide element 16 with concave guide surfaces 31 relative to the two clamping rings 14 and guide surfaces 30 which are convex on the exterior relative to housing 11 make it possible to enclose clamping rings 14 in a large region when torque is applied from the drive side, and to therefore guide and support the movement of clamping rings 14. In this context, it is also important to note that V-shape-positioned clamping surfaces 22 of housing 11 greatly reduce the radial deformations that occur when clamping rings 14 are clamped, and that clamping rings 14 and guide element 16 itself are supported.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 050 043.6 | Oct 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/54005 | 8/15/2005 | WO | 1/15/2007 |