The invention relates to the field of power management units (PMU) and especially to power management units requiring pulse width modulation controllers. Such PMU's are in common usage in many devices, but especially in mobile devices such as mobile phones, smartphones, tablet computers and other similar communication and data processing devices.
Mobiles devices imply high constraints in the embedded power management unit. Typically, these power management units are comprised of buck convertors which are synchronized by a main clock phased by a pulse width modulated (PWM) control.
The main clock 1 (CLK) is phase shifted by the blocks 2, 3, 4 (PH1, PH2, PH3). Each of these blocks shifts the clock phase by a different value so as to produce 3 different clocks, CLK_1, CLK_2, CLK_3. Each of these clocks drives a respective one of the buck convertors 5, 6, 7, respectively BUCK1, BUCK2, BUCK3. In the basic example of the
In general where N is the number of buck convertors, the clock CLK_i driving the buck convertor BUCK_i may be shifted by 360×i/N, where iε[0, N−1]. This architecture prevents all the buck convertors starting their conduction cycle on the same clock rising edge, which would lead to a large undershoot on the battery. For this reason, the buck convertors are often referred to as PWM synchronized voltage mode control.
At the beginning of the clock signal, the state machine SM operates a latch L1 to power PMOS 8 on to conduct the clock signal will synchronously keep the NMOS 9 non-conducting (off). Each time the error signal Verror crosses the Vramp signal, the state machine turns the PMOS 8 off and switches a latch L2 to power on an NMOS 9 to the conducting state. The end of the NMOS conduction cycle is set by the signal Vx at the end of the clock cycle. This is further illustrated by the
An important drawback of this architecture is that in case of high output load transients, the output voltage undershoots. The load transient performance is dependent not only on the output filters L and C but also on the phase difference between (ΔTd) the output load transient step and the clock rising edge. Due to the dependence on the phase difference between the output load transient step and the clock rising edge, the load transient performance can be impacted by 30%.
High output load transients are more and more a requirement from the market. There is therefore a need for a technical solution which will reduce the impact on the performance of high output load transients.
Accordingly the present invention provides a pulse width modulation (PWM) controller having synchronized PWM voltage mode control architecture comprising:
means for detecting a transient load and
means for asynchronously changing the state of the state machine.
The PWM preferably reduces the phase difference between the output load transient step and the clock rising edge in order to minimize or prevent output voltage undershoot. Preferably this is achieved by applying the output of an amplifier of the PWM to a transient load detection means provided by a transient load detection circuit. The transient load detection circuit may comprise a MOSFET or transistor with similar performance, having a gate terminal to which an error voltage signal output by the amplifier is applied to generate a detection signal at the drain terminal.
The detection signal may be applied to a delaying circuit. The delaying circuit is preferably responsive to a rapidly changing detection signal to generate signals to control the conduction states of each of a PMOS transistor and an NMOS transistor. The signals may be latch signals to actuate latches controlling each respective PMOS and NMOS transistor. The delaying circuit generates each latch signal at relatively different times, i.e. the delaying circuit provides the means for asynchronously changing the state of the state machine.
To minimise ΔTd the source of the MOSFET is connected to a load/source resistor in parallel with a capacitor. This minimizes current at the source and drain during steady state operation when the capacitor is does not conduct. However, under rapid transition the capacitor acts as if to short across the resistance to induce a detection signal with much reduced phase lag at the MOSFET drain terminal. The delaying circuit responds nearly instantaneously to the detection signal to induce the asynchronous conduction state switching of the PMOS and NMOS transistors.
A PMU and a method of operation of a PMU embodying the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying illustrative figures, in which:
The circuit DC enables detection of the load transient. It is based on fast change of the Verror signal. Indeed, when a fast and large load stress is applied at the output of the buck convertor, the Verror signal (measured at the output of the amplifier Amp) increases fast because of the large amplifier gain and bandwidth as a result of the output load step.
Turning back to
When the error voltage signal (Verror) increase rapidly, the source capacitor 19 conducts and causes a short circuit across the source/load resistor 18 during this fast transient event. During these few nanoseconds, a large current flows between the drain and the source. The current is large by comparison with the steady state condition. Consequently, the voltage at the drain makes a fast negative spike from Vcc and the inverted output voltage follows a very fast positive spike from zero to Vcc.
The power consumption is set mainly by the value of the load resistor 18 and can thus be kept low by keeping the source current through the load resistor below 1 μA. One of the advantages of the invention is to keep current consumption at a very low level.
The detection signal S is applied to a delaying circuit D. The delaying circuit D generates two latch signals, S1, S2. As shown in
Various simulations have showed that the load transient performance is improved by 10% to 20%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12306439 | Nov 2012 | EP | regional |
13368041 | Oct 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/073923 | 11/15/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/076229 | 5/22/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20060055387 | Steele | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060055388 | Tang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20100043757 | Bolz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110006745 | Saphon | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110304307 | Shieh | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120013322 | Dearborn | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120105035 | Lee | May 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in corresponding International application No. PCT/EP2013/073923, date of mailing of report Apr. 1, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150256159 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |