1. Field
The present invention relates generally to voltage regulators and, more particularly, to low dropout regulators.
2. Description of Related Art
Low dropout (LDO) voltage regulators are distinguished from more traditional regulators by their ability to maintain regulation even when there are only small differences between a supply voltage and a load voltage. Thus, “dropout voltage” refers to the difference between the output voltage and the input voltage at which the circuit quits regulation.
Related LDOs may have either an NMOS output transistor or a PMOS output transistor which may be selected based on a number of design considerations. In particular,
In operation, a voltage glitch of the reference voltage 102 may cause an increase of the output voltage. When the glitch goes away, the output voltage also is supposed to return to normal but what may happen is that the control loop will turn off the NMOS output transistor. Because the output capacitor may have a large capacitance, it takes a relatively long time to drain any extra charge when the load current is small. During this relatively long period of time the internal compensation node will also discharge until reaching a ground state.
If, however, another load is applied during this period, it will take time to charge the internal compensation capacitor 110 before the gate of the output transistor 114 is driven high enough to drive an output. In other words, the internal compensation node will have to swing from ground to VOUT 120 which will take time especially if the compensation capacitor 110 is relatively large and the current source is low. This behavior is undesirable and disadvantageous.
Accordingly, there remains an unfilled need in this technology for improvements to LDOs that maximize load transient response times without disadvantageous design choices.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to a voltage controlled current source circuit that is utilized to clamp the internal compensation node of a low dropout (LDO) regulator with an NMOS output during load transients. The circuit senses a voltage drop of the internal node and mirrors its current to the internal node to hold the internal node voltage when the voltage starts to drop low enough to turn off the output transistor.
It is understood that other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein it is shown and described only various embodiments of the invention by way of illustration. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments and its several details are capable of modification in various other respects, all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
Various aspects of embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various embodiments of the invention and is not intended to represent the only embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well known structures and components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the invention.
One related approach for addressing disadvantages of LDO regulators with NMOS output transistors is depicted in
The compensation capacitor 310 is coupled between a compensation node and ground. The gate of a PMOS transistor 326 is also electrically coupled with the compensation node and is configured to sense the voltage level at the compensation node. In particular, the PMOS transistor 326 is used to sense a voltage drop at the compensation node. If the compensation node drops more than approximately the threshold voltage Vthreshold of the transistor 326 below the output voltage 320, the PMOS transistor 326 is turned on.
As shown in
One advantage of the PMOS transistor 326 is that it will substantially match the other PMOS transistor 312 over process variations. At the most troublesome process corner (e.g., weak PMOS, strong NMOS, and at high temperatures), the PMOS sensor transistor 326 will become more difficult to be turned on, which minimizes the current that may be injected into the compensation node by the clamping circuit when the circuit is supposed to stay in regulation and the clamping current is not necessary. Additionally, when the load transients result in the PMOS sensor transistor 326 being turned on, a threshold matching between it and the other PMOS transistor 312 helps set the gate clamping voltage more precisely. For example, only a few microamps may be needed to stop the compensation node from falling, which results in a utilizing a relatively small PMOS transistor that can clamp the compensation node to approximately the output voltage.
By way of further explanation, the voltage controlled current source 328 of
In operation, ID of transistor 404 mirrors the drain current ID of the transistor 402 according to the following relationship:
ID 404=ID 402 [(W/L)404/(W/L)402]
where W and L refer to the channel length and width of the transistor. Thus, the resulting current ID 404 can be controlled to substantially mirror the current ID 402 through transistor 402 by selecting similar process characteristics between the two transistors. In a similar manner, the drain current of transistor 408 mirrors the drain current through transistor 406. As shown in the figure, the current through transistor 406 the main contributor of the drain current of PMOS transistor 406. In a PMOS simple current mirror configuration,
ID 408=ID 406 [(W/L)408/(W/L)406]
Because IOUT=ID 408, the two current mirrors configured as shown in
It is worth noting that simply shorting the drain of the PMOS sensor transistor 326 to the compensation node may have unintended consequences. Its body diode would limit the swing of the compensation node during normal operation. According to the embodiments depicted, the current from the PMOS sensor transistor is turned around and sourced from a supply so that there is no direct current path between the VOUT 320 and the compensation node.
The previous description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the various embodiments described herein. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments. Thus, the claims are not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with each claim's language, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. Also, the term “exemplary” is meant to indicate that some information is being provided as an example only as is not intended to mean that that information is somehow special or preferred. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5867015 | Corsi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6556083 | Kadanka | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6690147 | Bonto | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700361 | Gregorius | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7088082 | Jung | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7170352 | Caldwell | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7218082 | Walter et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7268524 | Kase et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7557556 | Nakashimo | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7589507 | Mandal | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7629711 | Zhong et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659703 | Fesler et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7902801 | Mandal | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8129962 | Xie et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
“A User's Guide to Compensating Low-Dropout Regulators,” National Semiconductor, pp. 1-14 (Chester Simpson). |
“Frequency Compensation,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency—compensation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100156362 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |