The present invention relates to loaders operable to execute digging tasks or to transport and handle loads, wherein such loaders are mobile and each includes a device such as a bucket or attachment mounted onto a boom arm. Moreover, the present invention relates to arrangements for controlling such loaders. Furthermore, the invention also concerns methods of controlling such loaders and their boom arms. Additionally, the invention relates to software executable on computing hardware for implementing the methods in the aforesaid loaders.
Loaders are known. They are often each implemented as a four-wheeled vehicle with two substantially parallel boom arms pivotally mounted at their proximate ends towards a front region of the vehicle. A counterweight is often included at a rear region of the vehicle. Each boom arm is coupled at its distal end to a pivoting arrangement to which a device such as a bucket is coupled. Optionally, the bucket is demountable and the loader is configured to be able to accept other types of tools or attachments, in operation, such a loader is controlled by an operator or driver seated in a cabin of the vehicle. The operator or driver is provided in the cabin with controls for raising and lowering the boom arms as well as adjusting angle of the pivoting arrangement to which the bucket is coupled. Thereby, the driver is able to, for example, scoop a load, for example cement or building bricks, into the bucket and adjust an inclination of the bucket to retain its load, lift the bucket upwardly, and then drive the vehicle to another location for delivering the load held in the bucket. Alternatively, the driver can employ the bucket for digging operations, for example digging trenches and holes.
In view of a magnitude of physical forces required for such loaders to function, it is contemporary practice to employ hydraulic actuators, for example hydraulic cylinder actuators, for raising and lowering the boom arms, and also for adjusting an inclination angle of the pivoting arrangement associated with the bucket or attachment. Pressurized hydraulic oil for operating the hydraulic actuators is provided from a hydraulic pump coupled to an engine of the vehicle. Moreover, flow of pressurized hydraulic oil to and from the hydraulic actuators is regulated via hydraulic valves coupled appropriately to the aforesaid controls included in the cabin. As will be elucidated later, it has become contemporary practice to include sensors operable to sense orientation of the boom arms as well as orientation of the pivoting arrangement coupled to the bucket or attachment; signals provided by such sensors are coupled to a feedback arrangement employing signals from the controls in the cabin as reference signals.
Known loaders of a type described in overview in the foregoing will now be further elucidated. In a granted U.S. Pat. No. 4,844,685, there is described a loader including an electronic bucket positioning and control system. The loader employs a hydraulically-controlled boom arm assembly and bucket. The boom arm assembly includes a pair of boom arm lift hydraulic actuators, and a pair of bucket lift hydraulic actuators. Each hydraulic actuator includes a cylinder housing together with a piston rod movable in respect of its cylinder. Moreover, each piston includes therein a position sensor implemented as a linear potentiometer comprising a resistance strip for providing an electrical signal indicative in operation of a degree to which the piston rod is extended or retracted in respect of its corresponding cylinder.
In a published U.S. Pat. No. 4,923,362, there is described a boom arm and bucket system for a loader. The system includes a bucket leveling valve operable to maintain a desired orientation of the bucket as the boom arm is raised and lowered. The system employs first rotary angular sensors mounted at proximate ends of the boom arms whereat they are pivotally mounted to a vehicle body of the loader. Moreover, the system further employs second rotary angular sensors to sense an inclination of the bucket relative to the boom arm. The rotary angular sensors are conveniently implemented as potentiometers. Signals from the first and second angular sensors are coupled to an electronic feedback unit, for example implemented using computing hardware operable to execute software instructions, which compares the signals with reference signals generated from operator controls included within a cabin of the loader. In the system, the inclination angle of the bucket is directly and simply derivable from the signals generated from the first and second rotary angular sensors.
Of importance with regard to loaders described in the foregoing is ease of use and reliability. In view of a degree of power which operators of such loaders are able to control to execute various digging or lifting operation, it is vitally important that actuator sensors and their associated control systems are robust, for example to wear and debris generated in operation. A failure or inaccuracy in an actuator sensor implemented as a potentiometer can cause such a loader to function potentially erratically with a risk of damage to property or personnel.
Thus, two problems which are encountered with contemporary loaders concern robustness in use as well as dynamic handling characteristics. The first problem concerns robustness of the rotary angular sensors which can be conventionally addressed by employing a better quality of sensor. The second problem relates to reducing a risk of loads being manipulated by loaders unintentionally falling with associated potential problems of personal injury as well as damage to property; this second problem is conventionally addressed, for example as described in a European patent application EP 0 597 657, by controlling a rate at which hydraulic oil is applied or extracted from hydraulic actuators employed to actuate loader boom arms and associated buckets.
For aforementioned loaders, although loader operating performance has been enhanced, there is still a need for further improvements in loader performance, for example operating safety when manipulating and transporting loads, to satisfy exacting requirements demanded by contemporary users and operators of such loaders; such operating performance is a technical problem pertinent to the present invention which the present invention seeks to at least partially solve.
It is desirable to provide a loader with improved operating performance and operating robustness.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a loader comprising a vehicle including a structural frame and at least one elongate boom arm, said at least one elongate boom arm being pivotally mounted substantially at its first end to the structural frame and having at its second end an assembly for receiving in operation one or more tools, said loader further including actuators operable to actuate said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, and also including a control unit provided with user operable controls for controlling in operation position and orientation of the at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, characterized in that said actuators integrally incorporate therein magnetic actuator sensors operable to sense longitudinal extension of said actuators and thereby generate actuator feedback signals indicative of said longitudinal extension, wherein said control unit is operable to process said actuator feedback signals in a feedback control to render said position and orientation of said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly adjustable using said user operable controls.
The invention is of advantage in that the magnetic actuator sensors integrally incorporated within the actuators are capable of imparting improved operating performance and safety of operation to the loader.
Optionally, in the loader, the magnetic actuator sensors integrally incorporated within the actuators are each operable to sense relative positions of a piston and its associated cooperating cylinder of its corresponding actuator. Such a manner of including the actuator sensors is susceptible to increasing robustness of the actuator sensors and improving their sensing accuracy. Moreover, such magnetic sensors are found in practice to be highly robust and reliable and provide signals suitable for implementing the aforementioned feedback.
Optionally, in the loader, the actuators include a first actuator operable to actuate said at least one boom arm to vary its pivotal angle relative to the structural frame, and a second actuator operable to actuate said assembly to vary its pivotal angle relative to substantially the second end of said at least one boom arm. Such allocation of the first and second actuators is effective at providing a degree of isolation between local feedback loops controlling the boom arm and the assembly, thereby simplifying control and improving stability.
Optionally, the vehicle comprises an engine operable to provide actuation power for said actuators, said engine including an engine rotation rate sensor adapted to generate a rotation rate signal indicative of a rotation rate of said engine in operation, wherein said control unit is arranged to receive said rotation rate signal for adapting said feedback control in response to said rotation rate signal. Inclusion of the rotation rate sensor is capable of enabling the control unit to provide more stable feedback control in response to variations in engine rotation rate and hence available actuation power.
Optionally, in the loader, the control unit is operable to apply a mathematic translation to the actuator feedback signals to generate translated signals indicative of an inclination angle of the one or more tools and a height of the one or more tools, said translated signals being compared in the control unit with signals from the user operable controls to provide in operation said feedback control. Isolation of the control for inclination of the one or more tools relative to the control for height of the one or more tools is susceptible to rendering the loader easier to control and hence potentially safer in operation.
Optionally, in the loader, the feedback signals are operable to provide substantially a first order dynamic measure of angular orientations of the at least one boom arm and its associated assembly and one or more tools. Such first order dynamic response enables potentially more feedback to be applied to the loader and its assembly, irrespective of changes in their dynamic characteristics in response to varying loads being applied thereto in operation.
Optionally in the loader, the control unit is operable to enable the user: (a) to record one or more sets of preferred angular orientations of at least one boom arm and its associated assembly corresponding to preferred positions and orientations of the one or more tools, and (b) to invoke the one or more sets of orientations for operating said one or more tools for moving them to one or more of the preferred positions. Providing the one or more sets of preferred angular orientations and preferred position is susceptible to rendering the loader faster and easier for the user to operate, thereby potentially increasing efficiency of operation of the loader, for example when implementing repeated digging operations.
Optionally, in the loader, the vehicle includes an inertia! sensing unit for sensing at least one of inclination, acceleration, deceleration and vibration of said vehicle and thereby generating an inertial signal, said sensing unit being in communication with said control unit for receiving said inertial signal such that said control unit is operable to modify at least one of angular orientation and height of said one or more tools in response to said inertial signal for retaining a load borne in operation by said one or more tools more securely. Inclusion of the inertial sensing unit is capable of increasing operating safety of the loader, thereby more safely retaining and handling loads borne in operation by the loader, for example over uneven or inclined terrain.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a control system including a control unit control unit adapted to control operation of a loader, said loader comprising a vehicle including a structural frame and at least one elongate boom arm, said at least one elongate boom arm being pivotally mounted substantially at its first end to the structural frame and having at its second end an assembly for receiving in operation one or more tools, said system further including actuators operable to actuate said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, and also including the control unit provided with user operable controls for controlling in operation position and orientation of the at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, characterized in that said actuators integrally incorporate therein magnetic actuator sensors operable to sense longitudinal extension of said actuators and thereby generate actuator feedback signals indicative of said longitudinal extension, wherein said control unit is operable to process said actuator feedback signals in a feedback control to render said position and orientation of said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly adjustable using said user operable controls.
Optionally, in the control system, the magnetic actuator sensors are each operable to sense relative positions of a piston and its associated co-operating cylinder of its corresponding actuator.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there, is provided a method of controlling operation of a loader, said loader comprising a vehicle including a structural frame and at least one elongate boom arm, said at least one elongate boom arm being pivotally mounted substantially at its first end to the structural frame and having at its second end an assembly for receiving in operation one or more tools, said loader further including actuators operable to actuate said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, and also including the control unit provided with user operable controls for controlling in operation position and orientation of the at least one boom arm and its associated assembly, wherein magnetic actuator sensors operable to sense longitudinal extension of said actuators are integrally incorporated into said actuators, said method comprising steps of:
(a) generating actuator feedback signals indicative of said longitudinal extension;
(b) processing said actuator feedback signals in said control unit to implement a feedback control to render said position and orientation of said at least one boom arm and its associated assembly adjustable using said user operable controls.
Optionally, when implementing the method, the magnetic actuator sensors are each operable to sense relative positions of a piston and its associated co-operating cylinder of its corresponding actuator.
Optionally, in the method, step (b) further comprises steps of:
(c) applying a mathematical translation to the actuator feedback signals to generate translated signals indicative of an inclination angle of the one or more tools and a height of the one or more tools; and
(d) comparing said translated signals in the control unit with signals from the user operable controls to provide in operation said feedback control.
Optionally, in the method, said actuator feedback signals are operable to provide substantially a first order dynamic measure of angular orientations of the at least one boom arm and its associated assembly and one or more tools.
Optionally, the method includes further steps of:
(e) measuring using a rotation rate sensor a rotation rate of an engine of said vehicle and generating a corresponding rotation rate signal; and
(f) adapting said feedback control in response to said rotation rate signal to enhance stability of said feedback control.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided software on a data carrier executable on computing hardware of a control unit of a loader for implementing the method according to the third aspect of the invention.
It will be appreciated that features of the invention are susceptible to being combined in any combination without departing from the scope of the invention as defined herein.
By way of example only, embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to
The boom arm and bucket arrangement is mounted to a robust mounting member 30 of the loader 10; the mounting member 30 serves as a support or structural frame for the boom arm and bucket arrangement. As illustrated in
The tool interfacing member 250 is adapted to releasably interchangeably receive a variety of tools and related devices. For example, the interfacing member 250 is shown in FIG. 1 coupled to the aforesaid bucket denoted by 310; the bucket 310 includes a base panel 320 for holding and retaining a load in operation within the bucket 310.
The boom arm 40 and its associated components are controlled in operation from a control assembly denoted by 400. The control assembly 400 includes an electronic control unit 410; the unit 410 is conveniently implemented using electronic hardware, for example by way of computing hardware operable to execute software instructions or dedicated hardware such as one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). The assembly 400 has associated therewith an operator control console indicated by 420; the console 420 is coupled to the electronic control unit 410 as illustrated and will be elucidated in further detail later. The electronic control unit 410 is connected to first and second hydraulic control valves 430, 440 associated with the first and second hydraulic actuators 60, 300 respectively. The first hydraulic valve 430 includes hydraulic feed pipes or hoses 500 for injecting and extracting hydraulic oil from the first actuator 60 for actuating the first actuator 60 in operation. Similarly, the second hydraulic valve 440 includes hydraulic feed pipes or hoses 510 for injecting and extracting hydraulic fluid from the second actuator 300 for actuating the second actuator 300 in operation.
The vehicle 20 includes a rotation rate sensor 460 rotationally coupled to a rotating engine shaft of the engine 25 which drives the aforementioned one or more hydraulic pumps operable to provide pressurized hydraulic oil to the valves 430, 440. The rotation rate sensor 460 generates in operation a rotation rate signal 470 indicative of a rotation rate, namely RPM, of the engine shaft. The rotation rate signal 470 is coupled to the control unit 410. In operation, the control unit 410 modifies one or more of its feedback parameters, for example feedback loop gain, to improve feedback control stability in response to variations in available hydraulic power available to drive the actuators 60, 300.
The first and second actuators 60, 300 include internally therein position sensors 600, 610 for sensing in operation position of pistons of the actuators 60, 300 relative to their cylinders, namely measures of effective length of the actuators 60, 300 between their pivots 70, 80, 220, 270. The position sensors 600, 610 are preferably incorporated into the actuators 60, 300 in a manner as depicted in
The aforementioned console 420 includes first and second operator-adjustable controls 700, 710; conveniently, the controls 700, 710 are implemented as continuously moveable joy-sticks or levers although other implementations are possible. In operation, the first and second controls 700, 710 give rise to first and second reference signals 720, 730 representative of desired height and inclination tilt angle of the bucket 310 respectively. These reference signals 720, 730 are conveyed to the electronic control unit 410 which is operable to, in a complex manner, compare the reference signals 720, 730 with the position signals 740, 750 and thereby generate appropriate output signals 760, 770 to control the first and second valves 430, 440 respectively.
In comparison to contemporary known loaders described in the foregoing, the electronic control unit 410 is operable to perform more complex signal processing on account of the signals 740, 750 from the position sensors 600, 610 not being directly indicative of angular orientation of the boom arm 40 and the bucket 310.
In overview, the loader 10 is operable in dynamic situations to function in a different manner to known contemporary loaders. When applying feedback in general to mechanical systems, it is known that it is more difficult to stabilize such feedback when the system in an open-loop state is susceptible to exhibiting complex multiple pole-zeroes in its frequency response. Such feedback problems are further confounded when the mechanical systems exhibit back-lash, namely “dead regions” in spatial response. Moreover, such feedback is even more difficult to optimize when system characteristics are susceptible to temporally change; for example, the boom arm 40 has elasticity and is susceptible to elastically deforming and thereby functioning as a spring denoted by K in
A pressure of hydraulic oil provided from the one or more pumps to the valves 430, 440 is also a factor affecting responsiveness of the actuators 60, 300, namely response time constants exhibited by the loader 10. In order to improve user handling performance of the loader 10, the control unit 410 is operable to vary one or more of its feedback parameters, for example one or more of its feedback loop gains, or one or more of its feedback loop time constants, in order to improve handling responsiveness and stability of the loader 10.
Conventionally, to address a potentially variable open-loop system response, two approaches are possible:
(a) vary the feedback applied in response to changes in open-loop characteristics of a system to be controlled, namely characteristics of the boom arm 40 and its associated distal mass M; or
(b) apply a form of feedback which can cope with a full range of open-loop characteristics of the system to be controlled, namely characteristics of the boom arm 40 and its mass M.
Whereas the approach (a) represents further complexity in that dynamic response characteristics of the boom arm 40 and its mass M need to be periodically evaluated, the approach (b) results in sluggish performance which is manifest in sluggish and inaccurate response to adjustments of the first and second controls 700, 710 adversely affecting efficiency of use of the loader 10 and potentially reducing operating safety.
The inventors of the present invention have surprisingly found that the implementation of the loader 10 depicted in
Referring to
On account of the bend portion of the boom arm 40, an orientation θd of the distal end of the boom arm 40 at the pivot 260 is described by Equation 2 (Eq. 2):
θd=θ+θ0 Eq. 2
wherein θ0 is a constant angular offset. In a similar manner, an angle γ associated with the bucket 310 as illustrated can be determined from geometrical analysis. The elongate member 200 has a length denoted by a parameter “e” between its associated pivots 210, 220. Moreover, a distance between the pivots 210, 260 is denoted by a parameter “d”. Furthermore, a distance between the pivots 220, 240 is denoted by a parameter “f. Additionally, a distance between the pivots 240, 260 is denoted by “g”. All four parameters “d”, “e”, “f and “g” are substantially constant as they are determined by the lengths of their associated members 200, 230, 250 or portion of the boom arm 40. The second actuator 300 is operable to substantially modify a spatial distance denoted by a parameter “h” between the pivots 220, 260 to affect changes in the angle γ. The angle γ can be substantially computed from Equation 3 (Eq. 3):
Thus, an inclination angle α of the bucket 310 can be computed from Equations 2 and 3 as combined in Equation 4 (Eq. 4):
wherein θ1 is another angular offset constant. The parameters “a” and “h” are dependent on actuation of the actuators 60, 300 respectively. It is desired that the inclination angle α is a direct simple function of position of the control 700 and not substantially influenced by adjustment of the control 710.
Moreover, from further geometrical analysis, a substantial height H of the bucket 310 above a ground level, for example as denoted on an axis 1030 in
wherein H0 is a height offset constant and the angle θ is as defined in Equation 1 such that the angle θ is substantially a function of a length of the first actuator 60, and L is an effective length of the boom arm 40 from its proximate end to its distal end.
Equations 1 to 5 can be summarized by Equations 6 (Eqs. 6):
α=F1(S1,S2); H=F2(S1) Eqs. 6
wherein S1, S2 correspond to the position signals 740, 750 respectively. Measures of the inclination angle α and the height H derived from the position signals 740, 750 are compared with corresponding reference signals 720, 730 in the electronic control unit 410 and the signals 760, 770 appropriately adjusted to minimize a difference between the sensed inclination angle α and the reference signal 720, and also to minimize a difference between the measured height H and the reference signal 730. By doing so, the operator adjusting the controls 700, 710 will find that the control 700 responsively and accurately determines the inclination angle α of the bucket 310, and the control 710 responsively and accurately determines the height of the bucket 310.
It will be appreciated that the electronic control unit 410 can either employ computations to solve Equations 6 in real time, or otherwise employ pre-calculated look-up tables.
Operation of the loader 10 will now be further elucidated with reference to
The loader 10 is susceptible to function in both a transportation mode as well as a digging mode. In the transportation mode, the member 250 is beneficially provided with a fork arrangement as depicted in
Conversely, in the digging mode of operation, limits to a range of heights H through which the bucket 310 is capable of being manipulated are stored in memory of the electronic control unit 410, for example a highest position and a lowest position. Similarly, maximum and minimum inclination angles α achievable for the bucket 310 can also be stored in the electronic control unit 410. These limits can be stored as preset positions which the operator can invoke by pressing appropriate control switches or similar. For example, there can be provided a “return to dig” control to enable the operator to rapidly invoke a stored and therefore memorized digging position for the bucket 310.
A further refinement to the loader 10 is illustrated in
It will be appreciated from the foregoing that the present invention is not only capable of providing the operator of the loader 10 with more precise and stable control of the load 1200, but is also capable of increasing operator safety, both when the loader 10 is stationary and when transporting the load 1200 between locations. Such enhancement would not be contemporarily anticipated in that more comprehensive feedback around configurations of mechanical components would be perceived to be a logical approach to improving performance.
In order that the present invention is comprehensively described, implementation of the actuators 60, 300 will elucidated with reference to
The aforesaid sensors 600, 610 are implemented for each actuator 60, 300 by way of a magnetic transducer 3000 provided with a robust electrical connection 3010 at a peripheral surface of the second housing eye 2010. The aforesaid signals 740, 750 are derived via the electrical connections 3010 of the actuators 60, 300 respectively. The transducer 3000 includes a central shaft 3020 adapted to be accommodated within the aforesaid central hole of the piston rod 2020. Substantially at the distal end of the piston rod 2020, at an inside surface of the central hole thereof, an annular magnetic component 3030 is included. In operation, the magnetic component 3030 slides together with the piston rod 2020 relative to the central shaft 3020 thereby modifying a magnetic characteristic of the transducer 3000. Such modification of the magnetic characteristics of the transducer 3000 provides a measure of relative position of the piston rod 2020 relative to the central shaft 3020 and hence an indication of a length of the actuator between its housing eyes 2000, 2010. Either changes in inductance or change in magnetic field strength experienced by the transducer 3000 are used to generate the signals 740, 750. Use of magnetic sensing is found to be especially robust in practice, especially in view of the cylinder 2040 being operable to provide magnetic shielding for the transducer 3000, and relatively insignificantly affected by trace hydraulic oil and other debris arising within the actuators 60,300 during prolonged periods of use.
Modifications to embodiments of the invention described in the foregoing are possible without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
Expressions such as “including”, “comprising”, “incorporating”, “consisting of, “have”, “is” used to describe and claim the present invention are intended to be construed in a non-exclusive manner, namely allowing for items, components or elements not explicitly described also to be present. Reference to the singular is also to be construed to relate to the plural.
Numerals included within parentheses in the accompanying claims are intended to assist understanding of the claims and should not be construed in any way to limit subject matter claimed by these claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/013381 | 11/10/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/12/2008 |