The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for loading or for replacing dies in a press.
Press lines for the production of small parts or objects, for example telephone cases, housings for television sets and many others, may include several presses, each provided with a suitable forming die, which perform successive cutting and/or shaping operations on a blank or workpiece to give it the desired final configuration. The presses employed in such press lines may for example be C-frame presses.
The press lines may be provided with robots, for example serial robots with 4 axes or more, for transferring the workpieces, i.e. blanks or semi-formed parts, from one press to another. These robots may be relatively small, since they handle low weight workpieces and parts.
Each part or object to be manufactured in the press line requires a respective set of dies. Consequently, the dies of at least some of the presses of the line must be removed and replaced each time a new part or object is to be produced in the press line. The dies are much heavier than the workpieces and parts being manufactured; for example, a typical die for a part having a size of about 40×40 cm can have a weight of 1000 Kg.
In order to perform the replacement, operators using forklifts or the like may unload existing dies from the presses, take them to a storing space, fetch the new dies, and load them to the presses. This is time consuming and requires operators to be available at the right moment, and therefore it is not efficient and involves long downtimes for the line.
Another known die replacement system involves attaching to each press a pair of consoles, provided with rolling elements such as steel balls, and drive units e.g. one or more pistons. A new die to be loaded in a press is placed on the pair of consoles using e.g. a crane or a forklift truck, and displaced to the right position in the press by the drive unit. The existing die is previously unloaded from the press in using the same consoles and drive unit.
However, this requires providing not only the consoles and rolling elements but also the drive unit(s), which in addition must be connected to a power source.
It might be desirable to provide a simpler solution for the loading and unloading of dies, that allows reducing the downtime and the effort required for the operation and, hence, allows decreasing the cost and increasing the productivity.
According to a first aspect, the present disclosure is related to a handling system for loading a die in a press, wherein the handling system includes:
The use of robots for loading dies in a press allows automated loading of the dies without the need of external or additional driving units, by employing the robots that are already present in a press line for serving each press, i.e. the robots that feed workpieces to the press. Consequently, it provides an efficient and cost-effective solution for handling the dies.
Employing robots for loading the dies is also a particularly versatile solution: while other driving units are limited to very simple movements, robots can be programmed to perform any movement to bring a die from a suitable position in the vicinity of a press to the press position, and therefore allows choosing different initial positions from which the dies are to be automatically loaded in the press, depending on the needs of each particular press line or press.
Furthermore, dies may be provided at the initial positions in the vicinity of the presses during the normal manufacturing operation of the press line, such that when the press line completes a manufacturing batch and has to be prepared to manufacture a different object or part, and a die needs to be loaded in the presses, this step can be done without the intervention of human operators and only requires a minimum downtime.
Even though the robots that feed workpieces to presses in the production of small parts or objects are relatively small, due to the low weight of the parts to be handled, while the dies for these lines generally have a higher weight that the robots could not handle, this problem is solved by the provision of suitable sliding paths on which the die is supported during the loading operation, such that the robot does not need to lift the die, and only needs to displace it horizontally. The weight of the dies is supported by the sliding path.
By sliding path it is herein intended a path that is configured to reduce the friction between the die and the surfaces on which the die has to move, and therefore to allow it to slide. In some examples the path may include for example rolling elements such as bearing balls or bearing rollers, but also other solutions such as surfaces made of a low friction material that facilitates sliding of the die thereon, conveyor belts mounted on idle pulleys, etc.
According to another aspect, the disclosure is related to a press line including at least one press and a handling system as disclosed above, in which the robot of the handling system is also the robot for loading workpieces in the press.
Non-limiting examples of the present disclosure will be described in the following, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
Robots Rn, Rn−1 and Rn+1 are arranged in the press line for transferring workpieces (not shown) from one press to another during a manufacturing operation: for example robot Rn may remove workpieces from press Pn−1 and feed them to press Pn. Suitable robots for such an operation may be for example models IRB1200, IRB1400, IRB1600 or IRB4600, available from ABB (www.abb.com), amongst others.
In the example of
In some examples the robot Rn may engage a side surface or a top surface of the die at the supply position 20, and push it along the path 10 until it reaches the press position 30, where the upper die member and the lower die member may be clamped or otherwise fixed in position in the press, as known.
The robot may engage the die in several possible ways, depending on the requirements of each case. For example, the robot wrist may be rotated such that the tooling for picking the workpieces during normal operation is moved out of the way, and the robot wrist itself may engage the die; alternatively, the tooling may be changed, and a tooling suitable to engage the die may be mounted on the robot before the die loading operation.
In some examples the robot wrist and/or the die may be provided with suitable mechanical parts for a mutual engagement that allow the robot to push and/or pull the die; in other examples, the robot wrist may be provided with an electromagnet to be temporarily attached to the die.
In examples wherein the robot only needs to push the die, the robot wrist or tooling may simply be brought in contact with a suitable point of the die without being attached to it.
In
The linear sliding path 10 is configured in such a way that it can support a die allowing it to slide, such that the die is displaceable while it is resting on the path. The path may include for example a plurality of bearing balls, or bearing rollers, which may be arranged on two parallel lines as depicted in
The rolling elements 21, 22 such as balls or rollers of the path 10 protrude upwards from an underlying surface, so a die may rest on them. In some parts of the path the underlying surface is the press base, for example in the press position 30. In other parts of the path the underlying surface may be any frame part or auxiliary support surface of the press line, for example in the supply position 20.
In some examples, at least some portions of the sliding path 10 may be movable vertically between a higher, active position, in which the ball bearings or other elements protrude upwards from the underlying base 51, and an inactive position, in which they remain flush with the underlying base 51, or at a lower level. In the active position the die rests on the elements of the path 10 and can be displaced easily; once the die has been placed in the desired position, the path 10 may be shifted to the lower, inactive position such that the die also descends until it rests on the underlying, stationary surface. The surfaces underlying the path 10 may be provided with suitable grooves, recesses etc. to arrange the path elements and allow this operation.
The example of
Sliding path 40 extends between the supply position 20 and a waiting position 50, which like position 20 is outside the press, where a die may be placed, for example by a forklift truck, crane or the like, during a normal manufacturing process of the press line.
As shown in the figure, the sliding path 40 may be substantially perpendicular to the sliding path 10, and the waiting position 50 may be located between two presses of the line but towards the back side of the presses, and therefore outside the space through which the workpieces are transferred from one press to another by the robots. A die in the waiting position therefore does not interfere with the normal operation of the press line.
It will be understood that providing a waiting position 50, and a sliding path 40 between this position and the supply position 20, allows preparing the die change during the normal manufacturing operation of the line, such that this time does not add to the time needed for the dies change itself, and the downtimes for the die change operation may therefore be reduced. Furthermore, the waiting position 50 may be located such as to facilitate the operations of placement of the die, taking into account the layout and dimensions of the press line, the tools used to transport the die, etc.
Referring to
The old die may be removed or unloaded from the press Pn in the same operation in a way that leaves the press position 30 free to receive the new die, as will be described later on; alternatively, it may be removed before the loading operation of the new die is started.
Like in
Furthermore, in the example shown in
When one station of the table 60 is in the supply position 20, the other station is in a waiting position 70, and the rotatable table 60 may be rotated to move a die (not shown) between the waiting position 70 and the supply position 20.
A further example of a handling system according to the present disclosure is illustrated very schematically in plan view in
The handling system shown in
In the example shown in
When one station of the table 60 is in the supply position 90, the other station is in a waiting position 100, and the rotatable table 60 may be rotated to move a die (not shown) between the waiting position 90 and the supply position 100.
In the examples of
In some examples, the handling system may also include a centering system (not shown) for the die, for example suitable abutments, at the waiting position 50, 70 or 100. In the examples of
In some embodiments, a short additional linear sliding path 80 may be provided at the waiting position, perpendicular to the main sliding path existing at this position, to assist in placing and centering the die accurately.
For example, such a short additional sliding path 80 may be provided in
A fine centering system may also be provided in any of the above examples in the press position 30 on the press base, in order to correct potential positioning errors of the die in the waiting position and/or arising during its travel.
A handling system according to the present disclosure may also be employed for unloading a die from a press.
In order to unload a die from the press Pn in the implementations of
In the examples of
In the example of
It will therefore be understood that, in examples such as shown in
In
In
A similar method may be performed for example in an example such as shown in
In order to change the dies in the presses of all the line, and during a normal manufacturing operation of the press line, new dies are prepared at the waiting positions upstream of each press of the line, such that there is an empty waiting position, downstream of the last press.
Once the normal manufacturing operation is finished, the dies in each press are changed as described above, starting with the last press of the line: when the dies of the last press have been changed, there is an empty waiting position between the last press and the next-to-last press, and therefore the dies of the next-to-last press may be changed. The process is repeated until the dies in all the presses have been changed, and the empty waiting position is upstream of the first press of the line. All this process may be performed automatically, without the need of operators intervening at each press.
In a subsequent operation, which can take place while the press line is again performing a normal manufacturing operation, the old dies may be removed from the waiting positions, for example by an operator with a forklift.
In the example of
On the contrary, in the example of
Consequently, in the example of
For example, in the case of
Although only a number of examples have been disclosed herein, other alternatives, modifications, uses and/or equivalents thereof are possible. Furthermore, all possible combinations of the described examples are also covered. Thus, the scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by particular examples, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/067434 | 7/29/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/016603 | 2/2/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4587716 | Bytow | May 1986 | A |
4597709 | Yonezawa | Jul 1986 | A |
5120179 | Henderson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5337594 | Pettersson | Aug 1994 | A |
5582062 | Sommer | Dec 1996 | A |
5882285 | Seto | Mar 1999 | A |
6013017 | Aizawa | Jan 2000 | A |
6126582 | Dangelmayr | Oct 2000 | A |
20010029225 | Kawamoto | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040018925 | Harsch | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060160684 | Springston | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090126452 | Toeniskoetter | May 2009 | A1 |
20110151044 | Kato | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120260711 | Ikeda | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130310236 | Kojima | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20170015014 | Hoover | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20180021839 | Lee | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056357 | Kubinger | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103459059 | Dec 2013 | CN |
0128487 | Dec 1984 | EP |
S57199523 | Dec 1982 | JP |
H06142996 | May 1994 | JP |
2014004604 | Jan 2014 | JP |
WO2014002569 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/EP2015/067434 issued by the European Patent Office dated Apr. 20, 2016, 12 pages, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180221935 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |