This present invention relates generally to matching products and services with qualified consumers.
Loan borrowers present their service providers with unique marketing challenges and business issues. In a typical loan procurement scenario, a prospective borrower will approach a loan broker to find an appropriate loan. While some borrowers may be able to approach a bank or lender directly, it is more common for a borrower to work with a broker or loan originator who can present the borrower with a wide set of loan offers, products and services. The entire process for procuring a loan from a lender for a borrower is called loan origination.
In order to match the prospective borrower with relevant loan offers and promotions, the loan broker will take application information from the borrower and fill out the loan application. While historically this work was done on paper, recent advances in technology have made online and software-based applications commonplace. A loan brokerage service will typically use one of the many loan origination software (LOS) systems that are available to facilitate the information retrieval. Such LOS systems include Encompass®, Genesis 2000®, Contour The Loan Handler®, Calyx, and Byte. Encompass®, Genesis 2000® and Contour The Loan Handler® are trademarked products of the assignee of this application, EllieMae, Inc.
Once an application is filled out, the loan broker then has the task of finding relevant promotional offers, products and services (“loan products”) that best match the borrower. This process is often slow, laborious and inaccurate, as the broker may not have access to all of the best and most updated loan products. Lenders and suppliers of loan products and services constantly generate new products for potential borrowers, and it may be difficult for a loan originator to keep track of all of these changes.
In general terms, a real-time targeted loan screening service and method are disclosed that enables loan suppliers to quickly and efficiently deliver highly relevant products to a loan originator's LOS system to enhance the borrower's experience. The systems and methods facilitate contact between the loan originator and the loan supplier, without involving direct interaction with the borrower. An example loan screening system includes two modules: a first and second loan screening module. The example system also includes two databases: a supplier requirements database and a supplier products database. These databases can be part of either the first or second module, can exist separately as two databases, or can be combined into one database. The databases may be remote or local, and in addition, the databases may be distributed. Further, in some implementations where a distributed database remote from loan screening software system is used, those individual databases may be maintained by third parties and the loan screening software system may be configured to scan entries in those databases for matches.
In one implementation, the loan originator or broker, typically using a proprietary or commercially available LOS program, will have an integrated copy of the first loan screening module already installed on their computer. Once the loan originator begins filling out certain key fields in the loan application, or makes certain requests for a potential borrower, the system will activate or otherwise invoke the first loan screening module and begin the loan screening process. It will be appreciated that the first screening process can also operate on loan origination software systems that are entirely server based, accessible through a network, or distributed across more than one computer.
Once the loan screening begins, the loan screening software system's first module monitors the fields entered into the application. At a certain pre-determined point, the loan screening service's first module will transmit information to wherever the second module resides, e.g., remotely on a server or locally on the client. This second module uses data from the application to match the potential borrower against a stored database of supplier products. The supplier products database can be stored on the client computer as part of the loan screening system, or may be accessed over a network. This database will have information on products such as loans, offers or promotions. The data from the first module can also be augmented with other information to create an enhanced data set, which may reveal or target more or different promotional offers available to the borrower.
A second loan screening module uses the transmitted loan application data to match against a stored database of supplier requirements, which may also be kept on a client computer, on a server, or may be part of any of the two loan screening modules. Once a set of relevant loan products is found, information about these products can be transmitted back to the LOS software interface where the loan originator is located. It will be appreciated that some loan products may automatically be selected for transmission, rather than having the borrower meet certain requirements. Once the products appear in the LOS interface, the originator will then be able to work with the borrower to select the best product for the borrower's needs. The transmitted result can also contain additional details that may aid the borrower's decision. For example, if the loan product requires dynamic pricing, the system can enable the originator to request such information, which will be presented within the LOS interface.
After the borrower determines which loan product fits best, the originator will be able to use the system to select the product from within the LOS interface. The system can enable the LOS to communicate directly with the supplier of the relevant loan product, and the originator can “lock in” or apply for the desired loan.
Thus, instead of being limited to certain known loan products and services that may not be specifically tailored, updated or relevant to the borrower, the originator can present and give the borrower a wider array of specifically appropriate options. These options can be available in real time, and allow the borrower to make a more informed decision based upon his/her information and specified needs.
In one aspect a system is provided that includes an extraction module that monitors and extracts borrower application data as it is entered and a supplier requirements database stored in a memory device. The supplier requirements database contains information on pre-determined criteria to match against the extracted data. The system includes a supplier products database stored in a memory device. The supplier products database contains information on supplier products. The system also includes a product identifier that applies the pre-determined criteria from the supplier requirements database to the extracted data to identify one or more supplier products stored in the supplier products database.
Aspects of the invention can include none, one or more of the following features. The extraction module can monitor and extract borrower application data in real-time. The extraction module can be embedded in a client application that displays information generated by the product identifier within the client application's user interface. The extraction module can send data from the client application over an Internet, intranet or local area network. The extraction module and the product identifier can be resident on a single computer. The extraction module and the product identifier can be resident on a server, accessible through a network. Alternatively, the extraction module can reside on a client computer, the product identifier can reside on a server computer and the client computer and the server computer can be connected by a network. In yet another implementation, the extraction module can reside on a server computer, the product identifier can reside on a client computer and the client computer and the server computer can be connected by a network. The extraction module and the product identifier can reside on a client computer. The extraction module and the product identifier can reside on a server computer separate from a client computer that receives borrower application data.
The supplier can be selected from the group of suppliers consisting of lender, investor, settlement service provider, investment bank and a party interested in marketing products and services to borrowers. The supplier requirements database and the supplier products database can be a single database. The extraction module can further include an interface embedded within a client application that accesses at least one supplier's website and displays information from at least one supplier's website. The extraction module can include an interface embedded within a client application that accesses at least one supplier's website and permits selection of a product from at least one supplier's website. The supplier products database can further comprise information on one or more of aggregated loans, pooled-loan backed bonds, fixed-income investments or mortgage-backed securities.
In another aspect a method is provided that includes monitoring loan application data as it is entered into a client application, extracting loan application data from the monitored data in accordance with a first pre-determined criteria, matching the extracted data against supplier products and displaying one or more of matching supplier products within a client application interface.
Aspects of the invention can realize none, one or more of the following advantages. A loan screening system can be provided that is capable of real-time, automatic monitoring and evaluation of prospective borrowers. The system can match those borrowers with relevant loan products upon entering a pre-determined minimum amount of information into either a LOS system located locally, remotely, or on some website-based LOS system. A LOS system is provided that is capable of screening loan application data in real-time against pre-determined criteria associated with particular loan products. Once a loan application meets the pre-determined criteria, a system can be provided that quickly returns highly relevant loan products to the LOS system, without any additional proactive intervention by the operator.
The system can monitor the LOS system in real time, and deliver relevant programs directly to the LOS system without the need to work with additional software or outside resources. The system would not necessarily need to be coupled to a LOS program on a client computer, or a lender database on a server. The system may be separated into modules that can reside either entirely on the client computer, entirely on a server, accessible through a network connection, or some combination of all three. The added efficiency and convenience of such a system can generate positive goodwill between the borrower and the loan origination service, which can lead to better communication and improved customer relations for the loan origination service, the lenders and the borrower. Additionally, the added flexibility of such a system can ease deployment and adoption of the invention by current loan origination services.
These and other aspects are discussed below with reference to the drawings.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the Figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which:
An integrated real-time loan screening software system and methods are disclosed. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to facilitate explanation. The description of the preferred embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Aspects of the present invention may be implemented on one or more computers executing software instructions. According to one embodiment of the present invention, server and client computer systems transmit and receive data over a computer network and/or a fiber or copper-based telecommunications network. The steps of accessing, downloading, and manipulating the data, as well as other aspects of the present invention can be implemented by central processing units (CPU) in the server and client computers executing sequences of instructions stored in a memory. The memory may be a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), a persistent store, such as a mass storage device, or any combination of these devices. Execution of the sequences of instructions causes the CPU to perform steps according to embodiments of the present invention.
The instructions may be loaded into the memory of the server or client computers from a storage device or from one or more other computer systems over a network connection. For example, a client computer may transmit a sequence of instructions to the server computer in response to a message transmitted to the client over a network by the server. As the server receives the instructions over the network connection, it stores the instructions in memory. The server may store the instructions for later execution, or it may execute the instructions as they arrive over the network connection. In some cases, the CPU may directly support the downloaded instructions. In other cases, the instructions may not be directly executable by the CPU, and may instead be executed by an interpreter that interprets the instructions. In other embodiments, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of, or in combination with, software instructions to implement the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software, nor to any particular source for the instructions executed by the server or client computers. In some instances, the client and server functionality may be implemented on a single computer platform.
Aspects of the present invention can be used in a distributed electronic commerce application that includes a client/server network system that links one or more server computers to one or more client computers, as well as server computers to other server computers and client computers to other client computers. The client and server computers may be implemented as desktop personal computers, workstation computers, mobile computers, portable computing devices, personal digital assistant (PDA) devices, cellular telephones, digital audio or video playback devices, set top boxes, mobile devices, other electronic devices or any other similar type of device. For purposes of the following description, the terms “network,” “computer network,” and “online” may be used interchangeably and do not imply a particular network embodiment or topography. In general, any type of network (e.g., LAN, WAN, or Internet) may be used to implement an online or computer networked implementation of the system and methods.
For purposes of the present discussion, a loan originator is any person or entity that helps to procure a loan on behalf of a borrower, and can include loan brokers, loan officers, loan processors, correspondent brokers, small banks that provide brokerage services, and any other similar type of loan procurement company or personnel. As used herein, the term “loan broker” is used to represent any such type of loan originator. Also for purposes of the present invention, LOS refers to any loan origination software system or program used by a loan origination or loan brokerage service to collect and store a borrower's loan application data and personal information, including reports and documents from other sources, such as, e.g., credit reports, title searches, disclosure statements, etc.
As shown in
At step 202 screening of application data can be initiated based on a trigger event. For example, the first loan screening module 101 can begin loan screening in real time as soon as certain events occur, such as saving the loan application file, ordering the borrower's credit report, or importing liabilities into the LOS program. The first loan screening module 101 can contain instructions to monitor data entry in real-time, and when the borrower or broker has fulfilled a pre-determined set of conditions, the data is captured and presented to the second loan screening module for comparison against pre-determined criteria for available loan products. In one implementation, the pre-determined set of conditions is whether certain fields have been completed in the loan application 320 shown in
As part of step 203, supplier requirements can be identified. Supplier requirements refers to the combination of characteristics of loan application data and other data that will trigger an offer for a promotion by a loan originator. In one implementation, a database of supplier requirements, which may either reside on the client computer with the LOS, or on a server accessible through a network is identified. The supplier requirements database may also be part of either the first or second loan screening modules, or may be part of a database that stores information on supplier products (“supplier products database”). Suppliers are defined as lenders, investors, settlement service providers, or any party that would have an interest in leveraging a loan screen service to target products and offers to originators and borrowers. Supplier requirements may include a set of attributes that can either be fixed, or can be delivered from the supplier through a real-time web interface. If the attributes are fixed, then they may be entered manually, through a user interface, or pulled/pushed periodically from a web interface.
Once the necessary information has been received (e.g., the minimum fields have been filled in), at step 204 of
In some implementations, the transmitted loan application data may be augmented with additional third party data to produce an enhanced data set. At step 205, the minimum required loan application data, either augmented with the enhanced data set or by itself, is compared to supplier requirements. In some implementations, the comparison can occur before transmission in step 204. In alternative implementations, the initial screening prior to transmission can be provided to determine candidate loan applications while the second screening after transmission can be used to target particular promotions that may be available to the candidates. For example, the second loan screening module 102 (and in particular loan screening engine 121) can compare transmitted data with or without augmented data to one or more entries in the supplier requirements database 130. Once a match is located, at step 206 supplier products are identified. For example, one or more supplier products that correspond to matching supplier requirements can be determined. Entries in the supplier products database 140 include or have an associated mapping from entries in the supplier requirements database 130. Alternatively, a singular database with single entries including both requirements and products/promotions can be used. Like the supplier requirements database, the supplier products database can reside on the client computer with the LOS, or on a server accessible through a network. The supplier products database can contain promotions that are fixed or dynamically updated with real-time services, such as eligibility and pricing. Relevant matching supplier products, as defined by the supplier requirements and the borrower application data, are then delivered (e.g., by the promotion engine 150 back to the first loan screening module in the originator's LOS program), as shown in step 208 of
Upon delivery of the promotions, the originator can select a chosen product, register the associated loan file and lock in the loan. The originator can also have the ability to manually augment the borrower data set and re-transmit the application to the second loan screening module.
Other processes for procuring and displaying the matching loans and promotions can also be made available. For example, by clicking on a particular product, the loan screening service can focus on the details of that product. An example user interface associated with a focused product detail is shown in
As an added feature, the system can enable seamless transmission and interaction with a supplier, all within the LOS program interface. An example user interface is shown in
Although embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to a network implementation comprising the internet and internet-related web browsing and web serving technologies, it should be noted that alternative embodiments of the present invention can be implemented on many other types of networks and network protocols, such as proprietary protocols for local area networks, wide area networks, and any combination thereof.
The present invention has been described primarily in relation to loan applications for home mortgage loans. One skilled in the relevant art, however, would appreciate that many other types of loans can be processed through the embodiments described herein, such as commercial loans, personal loans, home equity loans, extensions of credit, and the like.
The interfaces illustrated in
In the foregoing, the system has been described for screening, processing and submitting loan application data through an embedded loan origination software program and loan processing interface system. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5091868 | Pickens et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5111185 | Kozaki | May 1992 | A |
5144693 | Morgan | Sep 1992 | A |
5148520 | Morgan | Sep 1992 | A |
5191525 | LeBrun et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5226137 | Bolan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5438657 | Nakatani | Aug 1995 | A |
5581700 | Witte | Dec 1996 | A |
5611052 | Dykstra et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5699527 | Davidson | Dec 1997 | A |
5704029 | Wright, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5734898 | He | Mar 1998 | A |
5752042 | Cole et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765144 | Larche et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768510 | Gish | Jun 1998 | A |
5774551 | Wu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812764 | Heinz, Sr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5913029 | Shostak | Jun 1999 | A |
5919247 | Van Hoff et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940812 | Tengel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963952 | Smith | Oct 1999 | A |
5995947 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995985 | Cai | Nov 1999 | A |
6000033 | Kelley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006242 | Poole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006334 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023714 | Hill et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029149 | Dykstra et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6078403 | Palmer | Jun 2000 | A |
6081893 | Grawrock et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088700 | Larsen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088796 | Cianfrocca et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092121 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101510 | Stone et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104394 | Lisle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128602 | Northington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154751 | Ault et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157953 | Chang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175926 | Fogle | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202206 | Dean et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208979 | Sinclair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209095 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226623 | Schein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233582 | Traversat et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266716 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282658 | French et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6321339 | French et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324524 | Lent et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324648 | Grantges, Jr. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336124 | Alam et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338064 | Ault et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339828 | Grawrock et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341351 | Muralidhran et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351776 | O'Brien et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363391 | Rosensteel, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366912 | Wallent et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385655 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397337 | Garrett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418448 | Sarkar | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424968 | Broster et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438526 | Dykes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446141 | Nolan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469714 | Buxton et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473892 | Porter | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476828 | Burkett et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476833 | Moshfeghi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477537 | Gustman | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6493871 | McGuire et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496936 | French et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504554 | Stone et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538669 | Lagueux, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553408 | Merrell et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6608634 | Sherrard et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611816 | Lebda et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615405 | Goldman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640278 | Nolan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662340 | Rawat et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6851087 | Sibert | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859878 | Kerr et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6904412 | Broadbent et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920434 | Cossette | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6947943 | DeAnna et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7058971 | Horikiri | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7103650 | Vetrivelkumaran et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7155490 | Malmer et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165250 | Lyons | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185333 | Shafron | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7263663 | Ballard et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7340714 | Upton | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7379965 | Sherwood et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20010010046 | Muyres et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011246 | Tammaro | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010029482 | Tealdi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032178 | Adams et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037288 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039516 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047307 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047326 | Broadbent et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049653 | Sheets | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019804 | Sutton | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029188 | Schmid | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020059137 | Freeman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065879 | Ambrose et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020138414 | Baker, IV | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188941 | Cicciarelli et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194219 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033241 | Harari | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046586 | Bheemarasetti et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061398 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065614 | Sweeney | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066065 | Larkin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030159136 | Huang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163598 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184585 | Xu | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210428 | Bevlin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229581 | Green et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233316 | Hu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019558 | McDonald et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034592 | Hu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088700 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040138996 | Bettenburg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040225596 | Kemper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050172271 | Spertus et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050235202 | Chen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050278249 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289046 | Conyack, Jr. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005036 | Hu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060075070 | Merissert-Coffinieres et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101453 | Burkhart et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060155639 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178983 | Nice et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184452 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060248003 | Basin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0021011 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Byte User Guide. Version 4.8, CBC Companies: Nov. 2003. |
http://www.elliemae.com/ellie-mae-breaks-ground-with-dynamic-loan-screening-the-industrys-first-loan-matching-system/ May 21, 2007. |
http://www.ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/doc0350—bodyoftext.htm. Mar. 1, 1998. |
Contour Software, Inc.—The Loan Closer for Windows—Version 4.0 (1984-1998). |
Contour Software, Inc.—The Loan Handler—Version 5.0 (1984-2001). |
Ilium Software eWallet Users Guide and Reference Version 4.0 by Ilium Software, Inc. © 1997-2006. |
Calyx Software, “Point for Windows Version 3.x Interface Development Guide,” Nov. 29, 1999, pp. 1-21. |
Calyx Software, “Point for Windows Version 3.x Interface Marketing Guide,” Dec. 8, 1999, pp. 1-5. |
LOS Documentation—Genesis (2001). |
LOS Documentation—Calyx (Revised Aug. 2002). |
Calyx Point—Getting Started (2002). |
Calyx Point—Point User Guide (Revised May 2002). |
LOS Documentation—Byte (2003). |
Calyx Point—Point User Guide (Revised Oct. 2003). |
Calyx Point and PointMan—Getting Started (Updated May 2003). |
Calyx Point and PointMan—Getting Started (Updated Oct. 2003). |
LOS Documentation—Genesis (2003). |
Understanding Client-Server Applications, Parts I and II, zone.ni.com, Feb. 19, 2004. |
A Gentle Introduction to SGML, isgmlug.org, Apr. 14, 2004. |
Overview of SGML Resources, W3.org., Apr. 14, 2004. |
Application Service Provider, Webopedia, May 6, 2004. |
How ASPs Work, howstuffworks.com, Jul. 1, 2004. |
Defining an Internet ASP, howstuffworks.com, Jul. 1, 2004. |
Examples of ASPs, howstuffworks.com, Jul. 1, 2004. |
How ASPs Work, Things to Ask a Prospective ASP, howstuffworks.com, Jul. 1, 2004. |
User's Guide to Gator eWallet Version 7.x, published by Gain Publishing (no publication date known). |
Using MS Message Queue Triggers, Bradley Holland, consulting.dthomas.co.uk, date unknown. |
Mguill, “Genesis 2000 TechNet” Internet Publication, (Online) Jan. 28, 2003. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.genesis2000.com/support/index3.asp. |
Calyx Point—Getting Started (Updated Aug. 2002). |
Gator eWallet—The Smart Online Companion, Feb. 24, 2006 (2 pages). Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.gator.com/home2.html. |
Gator eWallet—Frequently Asked Questions, Feb. 24, 2006 (11 pages). Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.gator.com/help/gatorfaq.html. |
Point Installation (PN 801000-000737) (2 pages). |