Loblolly pine tree named ‘CF L3791’

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • PP19447
  • Patent Number
    PP19,447
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 7, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 11, 2008
    16 years ago
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • PLT 213000
  • International Classifications
    • A01H5/00
Abstract
A new and distinctive variety of a loblolly pine tree which has been denominated varietally as ‘CF L3791’ which is distinguished by high resistance to fusiform rust and pitch canker, excellent stem straightness, medium to wide crown width, few whorls to medium number of whorls, and very fast growth.
Description

Latin name: Pinus taeda.


Variety denomination: ‘CF L3791’.


BACKGROUND

A new variety of loblolly pine tree (Pinus taeda), has been discovered. This selection has been designated as ‘CF L3791.’


This new variety is a progeny of two first generation selections. Female parent is a first generation selection made in Williamsburg County, S.C. Male parent is a first generation selection made in Onslow County, N.C.


Cross pollination occurred in early 1997 followed by induction and cryopreservation of embryogenic tissue in 1998. First somatic seedlings were produced in 2000 and planted in early 2001 in seven field experiments. A total of 61 ramets were planted ranging from 5 to 11 ramets per field experiment. The field experiments are located in Mississippi, Florida, Georgia and South Carolina.


BRIEF SUMMARY

A new and distinct cultivar of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) is distinctly characterized by great resistance to fusiform rust and pitch canker, high growth rate, excellent stem straightness, medium to wide crown width, few whorls to medium number of whorls, and which is mature for commercial harvesting sooner than conventionally grown trees under the ecological conditions prevailing in the Piedmont, Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains, and Mid-Continent regions of the United States.


The Pinus taeda plants of this variety were asexually propagated using an advanced form of micropopagation called somatic embryogenesis carried out at CellFor's production facility in Victoria, Canada. Somatic embryogenesis uses a complex process which relies on the splitting of one embryo into many identical embryos. Somatic embryos can then be grown into plants which are all identical genetically. The asexual propagation occurs at an earlier stage in the plant's life cycle than most other micropropagated plants. The detailed methods for somatic embryogenesis used for asexually propagating conifers in general are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,372,496 and for loblolly pine in particular in U.S. Patent Application 2004/0203150.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings are color photographs showing the new variety of loblolly pine.



FIG. 1 is a photograph showing ‘CF L3791’ ramet #7 planted in Holly Hill, S.C. The picture was taken after five field growing seasons. The picture shows excellent stem straightness, few whorls to medium number of whorls per unit stem length, medium angle between the stem and the branches, and medium to large branch diameter (relative to the size of the stem).



FIG. 2 is a photograph showing ‘CF L3791’ ramet #4 planted in Winokur, Ga. The picture was taken after five field growing seasons. The picture shows superiority of growth and medium to wide crown width.





DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

The botanical details of this new and distinct variety of loblolly pine tree follow. All color descriptions are made in reference to The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart (2005).

  • Parentage: Female parent: (unnamed) first generation selection made in Williamsburg County, S.C. Male parent: (unnamed) first generation selection made in Onslow County, N.C.
  • Leaf: Evergreen needles, 6 to 9 inches long, with (usually) three yellow-green needles per fascicle. The color of this foliage was measured at age 1 year and age 7 years and was found not to vary significantly with age. The color of the foliage was RHS 137A (30%) and 137C (70%). Diameter of the fascicle was 6/100 of an inch and the average sheath length is 6.75 mm.
  • Flower: Monoecious; males long cylindrical, red to yellow, in clusters at branch tips; females yellow to purple.
  • Fruit: Ovoid to cylindrical, 3 to 6 inch red-brown cones; umbo is armed with a short spine, maturing in early fall. Cones are sporadic in 5-7 year old plants.
  • Branch: Orange-brown in color, fine to moderately stout; buds are narrowly ovoid, light reddish brown.
  • Bark: Initially red- to gray-brown and scaly; older trees are ridged and furrowed, with somewhat rounded scaly plates; very old trees have red-brown, flat scaly plates. The RHS color is 200C in shade and 187D on exposure to sun.
  • Shape: A medium to large tree can reach well over 100 feet tall, self-prunes well and develops a fairly straight trunk and an oval, somewhat open crown.


Compared to unimproved loblolly pine trees, ‘CF L3791’ is characterized by very high growth rate, great resistance to fusiform rust (caused by Cronartium quercuum (Berk.) Miyabe ex Shirai f. sp. fusiforme (Cumm.) Burds. et Snow), great resistance to pitch canker (caused by Fusarium circinatum Nirenburg et O'Donnell), excellent stem straightness, medium to wide crown width, and few whorls to medium number of whorls.

  • Average height: 26 ft after 5 field growing seasons.
  • Maximum height: 28 ft after 5 field growing seasons.
  • Average trunk diameter at breast height (4.5 feet above the soil level): 4.6 inches after 5 field growing seasons.
  • Maximum trunk diameter at breast height (4.5 feet above the soil level): 6.1 inches after 5 field growing seasons.
  • Percent stem fusiform rust infection at age 5: 2.
  • Percent branch fusiform rust infection at age 5: 6.
  • Percent branch and stem fusiform rust infection at age 5: 0.
  • Percent dead ramets due to fusiform rust infection at age 5: 0.


Percent stem fusiform rust infection in the USDA Resistance Screening Center (Asheville, N.C.) tests after artificial inoculation with rust sports: 6% (compared to 78% infection in unimproved seedlings).


Percent of seedlings with over 50% of tissue infected by pitch canker in the USDA Resistance Screening Center (Asheville, N.C.) tests after artificial inoculation with pitch canker spores: 0% (compared to 99% infection in unimproved seedlings).

  • Percent stem straightness gain over unimproved trees: 18.
  • Propagation: Propagated by somatic embryogenesis.
  • Seeds: None produced at age 5-7 years of age, plants are not yet mature. Expected seed production by 12-15 years of age.
  • Use: High yield industrial plantations.


Although the new variety of loblolly pine tree possesses the detailed characteristics noted above as a result of the growing conditions prevailing in the seven test locations, it is to be understood that the variations of the usual magnitude and characteristics incident to changes in growing conditions, irrigation, fertilization, pruning, pest control, climatic variations and the like are to be expected. An example of ‘CF L3791’ can be found at Plum Creek Oliver year 2001 line trial, Screven county, Ga.

  • Sampling of branch characteristics: In order to sample branches from a consistent position from one tree to the next the following methodology was utilized. From a point nine feet from the base of the tree, the first complete whorl of limbs below was labeled “Whorl One” and the first complete whorl of limbs above labeled “Whorl Two”. This sampling point was chosen because it is the midpoint of the basal sixteen foot log of each tree. A complete whorl was defined as one with at least three branches. An average whorl contained 2-7 branches. All measurements were taken commencing on the South side of the tree and progressing anticlockwise around the stem. When more than three branches were available for measurement on the whorl the largest three branches, by basal diameter, were used for sampling. The following branch characteristics were measured after seven field growing seasons.
  • Branch diameter: Diameter of each measured branch was taken at its base. Using a caliper the diameter of the branch, over bark, was measured to the closest 100th of an inch. ‘CF L3791’ has an average branch diameter of 1.08 inches at the base of the branch. Zygotic seedlings of the same genetic origin have an average branch diameter of 1.24 inches at the base of the branch.
  • Branch angle: Utilizing a large protractor, the angle of each branch was measured as its deviation from horizontal. Branch angles were recorded for the portion of the branch emerging from the stem of the tree with data rounded to the closest 10 degrees. ‘CF L3791’ has an average branch angle of 36.7 degrees from horizontal. Zygotic seedlings of the same genetic origin have an average branch angle of 44.2 degrees from horizontal.
  • Branch length: The length of each sampled branch was measured directly with a graduated measurement pole. Branch lengths were recorded to the closest 0.5 feet. ‘CF L3791’ has an average branch length of 8.17 feet. Zygotic seedlings of the same genetic origin have an average branch length of 8.80 feet.
  • Crown diameter: The width of the crown, at the point where branch measurements were taken, was directly measured with the use of a graduated measurement pole. A radial measurement was taken on the East and West side of each tree. Crown radius was measured to the closest 0.5 feet. Crown width data is presented as diameter of the crown. ‘CF L3791’ has an average crown diameter of 10.4 feet. Zygotic seedlings of the same genetic origin have an average crown diameter of 10.75 feet.
  • Internode length: In proximity to the area of the stem utilized for branch measurements the mean internode length was determined for each tree. Internode distances for the calculation of the mean were directly measured from the stem of the tree using a graduated measurement pole. ‘CF L3791’ has an average internode length of 2.4 feet. Zygotic seedlings of the same genetic origin have an average internode length of 1.7 feet.


Microsatellite markers were used to generate a unique DNA fingerprint for the variety.


Vegetative buds and/or foliar material from eight individuals each produced by controlled crossing among parents for DNA fingerprinting. The DNA extraction protocol of Doyle and Doyle (1987) was used after slight modifications. DNA fingerprinting of parents and their offspring was initially conducted using a set of nine microsatellite markers (Auckland et. al. 2002) and a final set of five primer pairs were selected for the two lines mentioned above (see Table 1, for sequences and conditions of SSR primers) Primer selection was based on their ability to produce unique alleles and the presence of high level of polymorphism.









TABLE 1







Sequences and conditions of the SSR primers


currently used in loblolly pine.














LABEL







TAIL




(F/R); E


Primer

(end
MgCl2
Tm
Size


ID
SEQUENCE (5′-3′)
labeled)
(mM)
(° C.)
(bp)















PtTX
F: CACGACGTTGTAAAAC
F
2.5
59
200


2146
GACCTGGGGATTTGGATT



GGGTATTTG;



(SEQ ID NO: 1)



R: ATATTTTCCTTGCCCC



TTCCAGACA;



(SEQ ID NO: 2)


PtTX
F: CACGACGTTGTAAAAC
F
1.5
55
225


3034
GACTCAAAATGCAAAAG



ACG; (SEQ ID NO: 3)



R: ATTAGGACTGGGGATG



AT: (SEQ ID NO: 4)


PtTX
F: GAAGTGATAATGGCAT
R
3
55
330


3049
AGCAAAAT;



(SEQ ID NO: 5)



R: GCAGACCCGTGAAAGT



AATAAACAT;



(SEQ ID NO: 6)


PtTX
F: TGTCGGTGGAGTTGGC
E
2
59
280


3105
AGTAGACT;



(SEQ ID NO: 7)



R: GCCCAGCGTTTCCTG;



(SEQ ID NO: 8)


PtTX
F: CACGACGTTGTAAAAC
F
2.5
59
165


3116
GACCTCCCAAAGCCTAAA



GAAT: (SEQ ID NO: 9)



R: CATACAAGGCCTTATC



TTACAGAA; (SEQ ID NO:



10)









Microsatellite products were detected by M13 tailed primer (Oetting et al., 1995) or infrared dye (IRD)-labeled primer. The amplification products were electrophoresed on 5.5% Long Ranger polyacrylamide gels using a LiCor 4200 automated sequencer (LiCor Inc., Lincoln, Nebr.). For each family, the female and male parents, as well as eight offspring were genotyped.


The observed parental genotypes and their expected offspring's genotypes at five studied SSR loci of each family are presented in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Parental genotypes and their expected offspring's genotypes


at five different SSR loci of each family.










Genotype











Primer
Female
Male
Expected offspring genotype
















PtTX
199/208
190/190
190/199
190/208




2146


PtTX
184/190
169/169
169/184
169/190


3105


PtTX
224/226
224/226
224/224
224/226
226/226


3034


PtTX
303/305
301/313
301/303
301/305
303/313
305/313


3049


PtTX
157/163
148/151
148/157
148/163
151/157
151/163


3116









In general, offspring genotypes segregated following expected simple Mendelian segregation (see Table 3, for offspring multi-locus genotypes).









TABLE 3





Parents and offspring genotypes at 5 different SSR loci


for two loblolly pine full-sib families.




















Sample
PtTX 3034a
PtTX 3049a
PtTX 3116













ID
ID
Allele1
Allele2
Allele1
Allele2
Allele1





Off-
L 3791
226
226
303
313
151


spring















Sample
PtTX 3116
PtTX2146a
PtTX 3105













ID
ID
Allele2
Allele1
Allele2
Allele1
Allele2





Off-
L 3791
163
190
199
169
169


spring






aAllelic sizes have LiCor primer tails.







  • References:
    • Auckland, L., T. Bui, Y. Zhou, M. Shepherd and C. Williams. 2002. Conifer Microsatellite Handbook Corporate Press, Raleigh, N.C., USA.
    • Doyle, J. J. and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissue. Phytochemical bulletin 19:11-15.
    • Oetting, W. S., H. K. Lee, D. J. Flanders, G. L. Wiesner, T. A. Sellers and R. A. King. 1995. Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared florescence and M13 tailed primers. Genomics 30:450-458.


Claims
  • 1. A new and distinct variety of loblolly pine tree named ‘CF L3791’ substantially as described and illustrated.
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20070079408 Pait et al. Apr 2007 P1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080141407 P1 Jun 2008 US