1. Field of the Invention
The field of the present invention relates generally to implanted devices for tissue stimulation, monitoring, and other therapeutic or diagnostic functions, and specifically to implantable devices for the stimulation of cardiac tissue, for example pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). More specifically, it pertains to such devices utilizing wireless energy transfer, for example through ultrasonic means.
2. Description of the Background Art
Conventional wired cardiac pacemaker and defibrillator systems comprise Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs) configured to be located subcutaneously and connect via leads to stimulator electrodes implanted in the heart. However, because the IPG is connected to leads, the location and surgical process must consider lead insertion into a vascular access.
An ultrasound based wireless cardiac stimulation system has been disclosed in currently pending applications by the applicant (e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/315,023). This system employs ultrasonic energy transfer from a subcutaneously implantable controller-transmitter device (C-T), which is directed towards one or more receiver-stimulator (R-S) devices implanted at desired sites in the heart, for example in the left ventricle. Ultrasonic transducers and circuitry in the R-S convert the transmitted ultrasonic energy into electrical energy capable of stimulating the cardiac tissue. The system, C-T, and R-S are described in co-pending U.S. patent applications Nos. (Publication Number) 20060136004, 20060136005, 20070027508, 20070055184, 20070078490 and 20070060961 and Ser. No. 11/752,775, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Energy and battery life computations show that the range between the C-T and the R-S has a dramatic impact on the efficiency of energy transfer between them. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the distance between the C-T and the R-S and thereby improve the efficiency of wireless pacing. An optimal location for cardiac stimulation is believed to be the posterio-lateral LV wall, and an optimal subdermal location for an IPG is the fifth intercostal space. These locations are approximately 10 cm apart. It is desirable to have a cardiac stimulation system that simultaneously optimizes the stimulation location and minimizes the wireless energy delivery range between the C-T and the R-S, thereby providing optimal battery life and optimal stimulation location. The present embodiments provide such a system.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to wireless cardiac stimulation devices comprising a controller-transmitter (C-T), a receiver, and a stimulating electrode, wherein the stimulating electrode and the receiver are separately implantable at different locations of the heart and are connected by a local lead. Separating the receiver from the stimulating electrode improves the efficiency of ultrasound mediated wireless stimulation by allowing the receiver to be placed optimally for reception efficiency, thereby resulting in longer battery life or reduced battery size. Separation of the receiver and stimulating electrode also allows the stimulating electrode to be placed optimally for stimulus delivery, and provides for improved connective reliability.
In one aspect, the C-T is implanted subcutaneously such that its transmission passes through an intercostal space, and the receiver is implanted at the apex of the left ventricle (LV) of the heart, thereby minimizing the distance between the receiver and the C-T. The stimulating electrode is implanted, separately from the receiver, at an optimal posterio-lateral LV location, and connected to the receiver via a local lead for transfer of electrical energy. One advantage of such a system is the longer battery life due to the reduction in distance between the wireless transmitter and the receiver. Another advantage is a reduced risk of embolization, since the receiver and stimulating electrode are attached at two locations of the heart wall, with the connecting local lead serving as a safety tether should either the receiver or the stimulating electrode become dislodged.
In one aspect, the system comprises a plurality of stimulating electrodes, thereby providing multi-site stimulation. In another aspect, the receiver itself comprises a stimulating electrode, thereby providing dual-site stimulation. In another aspect, the receiver and stimulating electrode are implanted in different ventricles, thereby providing biventricular stimulation, with the local lead crossing the ventricular septum to connect the receiver and stimulating electrode.
Another aspect of the invention is methods of using acoustic energy to stimulate cardiac tissue by (a) subcutaneously implanting a transmitter; (b) implanting a receiver at a first cardiac tissue location, wherein the receiver receives acoustic energy transmitted by the transmitter and produces a biologically stimulating electrical output in response to the received acoustic energy; and (c) implanting a stimulating electrode at a second cardiac tissue location, wherein the stimulating electrode is connected to the receiver by a local lead, and wherein the stimulating electrode receives the biologically stimulating electrical output from the receiver and delivers said output to cardiac tissue. Additionally, the first cardiac tissue location can be chosen to optimize acoustic energy transmission from the transmitter to the receiver. Another embodiment of the above method involves implanting additional stimulating electrodes, wherein the stimulating electrodes are connected to the receiver by the local lead. Alternatively, the additional stimulating electrodes are connected to the receiver by additional local leads.
The invention has other advantages and features which will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention can be practiced without these specific details.
An ultrasound based wireless cardiac stimulation system is disclosed which improves the efficiency of ultrasound mediated wireless stimulation and results in longer battery life. The system comprises two separately implantable subsystems. The first subsystem is a receiver-stimulator (R-S) configured to be implanted within the heart to provide electrical stimulation. The second subsystem is a controller-transmitter (C-T) configured to be implanted subcutaneously to wirelessly power and control the R-S.
To increase the operational efficiency and battery life of the system, the R-S itself comprises two separately implantable elements that are connected by a local lead. The first is an implantable receiver element (hereinafter also referred to as “receiver”), and the second is an implantable stimulating electrode element (hereinafter also referred to as “stimulating electrode”). The receiver wirelessly receives energy from the C-T, converts the received energy to electrical energy, and electrically powers the stimulating electrode via the local lead. The stimulating electrode receives the electrical energy and provides electrical stimulation to the tissue.
It is an advantageous aspect that the separation of the receiver from the stimulating electrode allows two goals to be simultaneously met. First, it allows the receiver to be implanted closest to the C-T, thereby minimizing the travel range of the wireless energy transmission from the C-T to the receiver. Second, it allows the stimulating electrode to be implanted at an optimal location within the heart for the delivery of electrical stimulation to heart tissue, independent of the location of the implanted receiver.
Reducing the distance between the C-T and the receiver allows more of the transmitted acoustic energy to be harvested by the receiver, since (a) less of the acoustic energy is spread to where the receiver cannot harvest it, providing a quadratic increase in gain as a function of the inverse of the distance between the C-T and the receiver, and (b) there is less intervening tissue between the C-T and the receiver that could lead to undesired energy dissipation. This means that the C-T needs to transmit less energy to achieve the same stimulation output. This provides not only a longer battery life, but also simpler C-T and receiver design, for example by using fewer transducers in the construction of the C-T and/or the receiver (such as only one transducer, in some embodiments).
Optionally, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/016,869, the C-T itself may comprise an implantable transmitter as well as a separately implantable battery for powering the transmitter via a subcutaneously routable electrical cable, thereby improving patient comfort and providing a larger usable aperture.
While the present embodiments refer to stimulating the heart, it is understood herein that the disclosed embodiments can be used to stimulate any living tissue in humans or animals. For example, published PCT application WO2007149936 with common inventor and assignee of this application, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes using a wireless stimulation system for stimulating various tissues.
C-T 102 is configured to be implanted subcutaneously so as to be close to a location in the heart where the receiver 103 is to be implanted. In one embodiment, the C-T 102 is implanted subcutaneously such that its transmission passes through an intercostal space, such as the 5th intercostal space.
The receiver 103 is configured to be implanted at a location within the heart where it can be closest to the C-T 102. In one embodiment, the receiver 103 is implanted at the septal apex of the LV, as shown in
In such an embodiment where the C-T 102 is implanted at an intercostal space and the receiver 103 is implanted at the septal apex of the LV, the distance between the C-T 102 and the receiver 103 is minimized to approximately 2-4 cm, allowing efficient energy transfer from the C-T 102 to the receiver 103, and therefore providing for longer battery life for C-T 102.
While
In one such embodiment, the receiver 103 can be placed on the anterior of the heart by using a minimally invasive surgical approach, as shown in
As shown in
Circuitry 107 further comprises one or more conversion circuits, wherein each conversion circuit is electrically connected to a corresponding transducer such that the electrical energy output from the transducers is converted to a biologically stimulating electrical output. For example, the conversion circuitry may comprise one or more rectifiers, as well as optional protection circuitry (such as comprising one or more Zener diodes) to protect the rectifiers from damage due to high voltages.
The stimulating electrode 104 is configured to be implanted at a cardiac tissue location, separately from the receiver 103, at a location that is optimal for delivering the stimulating electrical output to the heart. The stimulating electrode 104 comprises one or more electrodes (cathode) for delivering the electrical output to tissue, and is powered by the receiver 103 via a local lead 105. In one embodiment, as shown in
As described above, separating the implant locations of the receiver 103 and stimulating electrode 104 allows the system 100 to simultaneously optimize wireless energy transfer efficiency as well as stimulation location. Furthermore, separating the receiver 103 from the stimulating electrode 104 also reduces the risk of embolization, since the R-S ensemble is now attached at two locations in the heart wall, with the local lead 105 serving as a safety tether should either the receiver 103 or the stimulating electrode 104 become dislodged.
Optionally, the system 100 may be extended to provide multi-site stimulation. For example, the system 100 may comprise a plurality of stimulation electrodes to provide multi-site stimulation. In one such embodiment, the receiver 103 itself comprises a stimulation electrode, so that the heart is stimulated at the receiver 103 site in addition to stimulation provided at the stimulating electrode 104 site.
In another embodiment for multi-site stimulation, the system 100 comprises more than one stimulating electrode, each connected to the receiver 103 via a single or multiple local leads.
In another embodiment for multi-site stimulation, the system 100 may be configured with a plurality of receivers.
Optionally, the system 100 may be configured to provide biventricular stimulation. In one such embodiment, the receiver 103 comprises a stimulation electrode for providing electrical stimulation, and is implanted at a cardiac tissue location of the septal apex of the right ventricle (RV), allowing the receiver 103 to function as an RV lead for biventricular stimulation. In another embodiment, the receiver 103 may be implanted at a cardiac tissue location of the RV, with the local lead 105 having a very small profile (i.e. a small surface area lead) and puncturing through the ventricular septum to the LV and connecting the receiver 103 with one or more stimulating electrodes 104. Crossing the ventricular septum with such a small profile local lead would cause minimal to no trauma.
It is an advantageous aspect that the present systems 100 can be manufactured to minimize energy loss and thereby maximize battery life. In one particular example implementation, the C-T 102 comprises a fixed-focus transducer 110 with no steering capabilities, as shown in
Another example implementation comprises a high frequency receiver 103 with a small receiver surface area and a small number of transducers. For example, receiver 103 may be an 800 kHz high frequency receiver with three transducer elements and a receiver surface area of approximately 3 mm2.
In such an embodiment, the C-T 102 produces a homing signal using an array of transducers to track the location of receiver 103. It can be estimated that to produce a steering range of approximately 2 radians for a distance of approximately 3 cm, a 6×6 array of about 36 transducer elements could be used, with each transducer element having an element size of about 1 mm2.
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/174,509, filed Jul. 16, 2008, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3204637 | Frank et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3659615 | Enger | May 1972 | A |
3693627 | Berkovits | Sep 1972 | A |
3698398 | Berkovits | Oct 1972 | A |
3735756 | Richards et al. | May 1973 | A |
3832994 | Bicher et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3857382 | Williams et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3939844 | Pequignot | Feb 1976 | A |
3942534 | Allen et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3943936 | Rasor et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4026304 | Levy | May 1977 | A |
4041954 | Ohara | Aug 1977 | A |
4181133 | Kolenik et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4256115 | Bilitch | Mar 1981 | A |
4265228 | Zoll | May 1981 | A |
4280502 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4333469 | Jeffcoat et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4530360 | Duarte | Jul 1985 | A |
4561442 | Vollmann et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4561443 | Hogrefe et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4577633 | Berkovits et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4651716 | Forester et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4690144 | Rise et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
5018523 | Bach, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5063928 | Grevis et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5103129 | Slayton et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5113859 | Funke | May 1992 | A |
5165403 | Mehra | Nov 1992 | A |
5170784 | Ramon et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174289 | Cohen | Dec 1992 | A |
5193539 | Schulman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5292338 | Bardy | Mar 1994 | A |
5309898 | Kaufman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5377166 | Kuhn | Dec 1994 | A |
5405367 | Schulman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411535 | Fujii et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433731 | Hoegnelid et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441527 | Erickson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5496256 | Bock et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5547459 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556372 | Talish et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5674251 | Combs et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5749909 | Schroeppel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751539 | Stevenson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752924 | Kaufman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757104 | Getman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766227 | Nappholz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5814089 | Stokes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817130 | Cox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844349 | Oakley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861018 | Feierbach | Jan 1999 | A |
5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
5935158 | Holmstrom et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978204 | Stevenson | Nov 1999 | A |
5998910 | Park et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6037704 | Welle | Mar 2000 | A |
6070101 | Struble et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078837 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110098 | Renirie et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6141588 | Cox et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185452 | Schulman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208894 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223079 | Bakels et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231528 | Kaufman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233484 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6322527 | Talish | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330475 | Renirie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366816 | Marchesi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381493 | Stadler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408205 | Renirie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424234 | Stevenson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439236 | Porter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445953 | Bulkes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6534895 | Kadota et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
6628989 | Penner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645145 | Dreschel et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647292 | Bardy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652473 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654638 | Sweeney | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671547 | Lyster et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6707230 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721597 | Bardy et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754528 | Bardy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754531 | Kroll et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764446 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788974 | Bardy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798716 | Charych | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6834204 | Ostroff et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6856835 | Bardy et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6970742 | Mann et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983185 | Ley et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010350 | Kralik | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024248 | Penner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7198603 | Penner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7200437 | Nabutovsky et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7283874 | Penner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7610092 | Cowan et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7930031 | Penner | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20040015104 | Goldberger | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040138516 | Osorio et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147973 | Hauser | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172083 | Penner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040243192 | Hepp et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260214 | Echt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055056 | Olson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096702 | Denker | May 2005 | A1 |
20050288756 | Gray | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060136004 | Cowan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136005 | Brisken et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070027508 | Cowan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055184 | Echt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060961 | Echt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078490 | Cowan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080294208 | Willis et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100016911 | Willis et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4330680 | Mar 1995 | DE |
WO-9961058 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-03070323 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2007149936 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007149936 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abraham et al., for the MIRACLE study group, “Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure,” N Engl J Med, 2002;346:1845-53. |
ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, “Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult,” JACC 2002;38:2101-13. |
Allessie et al., “Regional Control of Atrial Fibrillation by Rapid Pacing in Conscious Dogs,” Circulation 1991;84:1689-97. |
Ansalone et al., “Bi-ventricular Pacing I Heart Failure:Back to Basics in the Pathophysiology of Left Bundle Branch Block to Reduce the Number of Nonresponders,” Am J Cardiol 2003;91:55F-61F. |
Auricchio et al., “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current State of the Art,” Circulation 2004;109:300-307. |
Bardy, et al. The Totally Subcutaneous ICD System (The S-ICD). PACE. 2002; 24,578. |
Becker et al, “Suppression of Atrial Fibrillation by Multisite and Septal Pacing in a Novel Experimental Model”, Cardiovascular Research 2001;54(2):476-481. |
Bradley, et al. Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. Feb. 12, 2003;289(6):730-40. |
Camm, et al. Chapter 6: Nonpharmaceutical treatment of atrial fibrillation, In Atrial Fibrillation. Facts from Yesterday—Ideas for tomorrow. Futura Publishing Company, Inc., Armonk, NY, 1994, pp. 125-147. |
Dalecki, et al. Effects of Pulsed Ultrasound on the Frog Heart: I. Thresholds for Changes in Cardiac Rhythm and Aortic Pressure. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 1993; 19:385-390. |
Dalecki et al., “Effects of Pulsed Ultrasound on the Frog Heart: II. An Investigation of Heating as a Potential Mechanism,” Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 1993; 19:391-398. |
Dalecki et al., “Thresholds for premature ventricular contractions in frog hearts exposed to lithotripter fields,” Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 1991; 17:341-346. |
Daoud, et al. Implantation techniques and chronic lead parameters of biventricular pacing dual-chamber defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Oct. 2002;13(10):964-70. |
Daubert, et al. Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Jan. 1998;21(1 Pt 2):239-45. |
Daubert, et al. Use of Specifically Designed Coronary Sinus Leads for Permanent Left Ventricular Pacing: Preliminary Experience. PACE, 1997; 20: II-NASPE Abstract 17, Apr. 1997. |
David Trial Investigators, The Dual Chamber and WI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial, JAMA 2002;288:3115-3123. |
Deshmukh et al. “Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future,” PACE 2004;27 [Pt.II]:862-70. |
Ellenbogen et al., “Detection and Management of An Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Failure,” JACC. 2003;41:73-80. |
Feldman et al, “Comparison of medical therapy, resynchronization and defibrillation therapies in heart failure trial (COMPANION),” Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials, 1 page. |
Franz, “Mechano-electrical feedback in ventricular myocardium,” Cardiovascular Research. 1996; 32:15-24. |
Gregoratos, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). Circulation. 2002; 106:2145-2161. |
Heckman et al., “Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 76, Issue 1, pp. 26-34, 1994. |
Hu et al., “Stretch-Activated Ion Channels in the Heart,” J. Mot. Cell Cardiol. 1997; 29:1511-1523. |
Johnson et al., “Adaptive Pacing During Ventricular Fibrillation,” PACE 2003;26:1824-36. |
Kalman J.M. et al, “Regional Entrainment of Atrial Fibrillation in Man”, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1991;7:867-76. |
Kass et al., “Improved Left Ventricular Mechanics from Acute VDD Pacing in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Conduction Delay,” Circulation 1999;99:1567-73. |
Kenknight, et al. Regional Capture of Fibrillating Ventricular Myocardium. Circ Res 1999;77:849-55.retrieve from the Internet: circres.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/77/4/849. |
Kohl et al., Stretch-Induced Changes in Heart Rate and Rhythm: Clinical Observations, Experiments and Mathematical Models. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology, 1999; 71:91-138. |
Kohl et al., “Sudden Cardiac Death by Commotio Cordis: Role of Mechano-Electrical Feedback,” Cardiovascular Research, 2001; 50:280-289. |
Leclercq, et al. Is Dual Site Better than Single Site Atrial Pacing in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation? PACE 2000;23:2102-7. |
Leclercq et al., “Systolic Improvement and Mechanical Resynchronization does not Require Electrical Synchrony in the Dilated Failing Heart with Left Bundle-Branch Block”, Circulation 2002;106:1760-1763. |
Leclerq, et al. Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Biventricular DDD Pacing in Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure. JACC 1998;32:1825-1831. |
Lee et al., “Effect of implantable Defibrillators of Arrhythmic Events and Mortality in the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial,” Circulation. 2002; 106:233-238. |
Linde et al., “Long-Term Benefits of Biventricular Pacing in Congestive Heart Failure: From the Muitisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) Study”, J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:111-118. |
Miracle Trial Investigators, “Combined Cardiac Resynchronization and Implantable Cardioversion Defibrillation in Advanced Heart Failure: the Miracle ICD Trial,” JAMA 2003;289:2685-2694. |
Mirza et al, “Biatrial Pacing for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation”, J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:457-463. |
Moss et al., “Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection Fraction,” N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:877-933. |
Niehaus et al., “Non-Contact Cardiac Stimulation with locused Ultrasound Pulses,” PACE 2003: 26:1023. |
Nielsen et al., “A Randomized Comparison of Atrial and Dual-Chambered Pacing in 177 Consecutive Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome,” J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:614-623. |
Nolte, et al. Mechanically Induced Ventricular Extrasystoles in the Isolated Perfused Guinea-Pig Heart. Arzneim.-Forsch/Drug Research. 1987; 37(11): 1025-1029. |
Office action dated Nov. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/174,509. |
Office action dated Feb. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/174,509. |
Office action dated Sep. 29, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/174,509. |
Peschar et al., “Left Ventricular Septal and Apex Pacing for Optimal Pump Function in Canine Hearts,” J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003;41:1218-26. |
Reiter et al.., “Effects of Mechano-Electrical Feedback: Potential Arrhythmogenic Influence in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure,” Cardiovascular Research, 1996; 32:44-51. |
Smailys et al., “Investigation of the Possibilities of cardiac Defibrillation by Ultrasound,” Resuscitation, 1981; 9:233-242. |
Sowton, “Clinical Results with the Tachylog Antitachycardia Pacemaker”, PACE 1984; 7(Part II):1313-1317. |
Tacker. Chapter 1: Fibrillation causes and criteria for defibrillation. In Defibrillation of the Heart. Tacker, WA, ed. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, 1994, pp. 1-14. |
The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators, “A Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy with Implantable Defibrillators in Patients Resuscitated from Near Fatal Ventricular Arrhythmias,” N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:1576-1583. |
Valls-Bertault et al., “Adverse Events with Transvenous Left Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Severe Heart Failure: Early Experience from a Single Centre,” Europace, 2001;3:60-63. |
Warren et al., “Clinical Evaluation of Automatic Tachycardia Diagnosis by an Implanted Device”, PACE 1986;9 (Part II):1079-1083. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160114176 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12174509 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 14979359 | US |