Localized sort of ranked product recommendations based on predicted user intent

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11676192
  • Patent Number
    11,676,192
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 22, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 13, 2023
    11 months ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • G06F16/24578
    • G06F16/248
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06Q30/06-0645
    • G06Q30/08
    • G06Q50/01
  • International Classifications
    • G06Q30/0601
    • G06F16/248
    • G06F16/9535
    • G06F16/2457
    • Term Extension
      431
Abstract
A system for providing product recommendations to online visitors to an e-commerce website is provided. The system may include program comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to sort a list of products based on a comparison of a user's interactions with the e-commerce website and previous user interactions with the same e-commerce website.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.


BACKGROUND
1. The Field of the Present Disclosure

The present disclosure relates generally to electronic commerce (“e-commerce”), and more particularly, but not necessarily entirely, to systems and methods for making product recommendations to online users.


2. Description of Related Art

Since the early days of mail cataloging, retail has used sales data to best order the products in catalogs. The method consists of taking a sales metric like the total purchase count of each product and using it to generate a rank of most popular to least popular. The rank is then used to order the products in the catalog. Likewise, online search results may be ranked according to product popularity. For example, products matching a search criterion entered by a user may be presented in the search results using a ranked product list. The most popular products in the search results may be listed higher in the ranked list than less popular products.


One shortcoming to ranking returned search results according to user popularity is that the search results may list undesirable products high in the ranking from the perspective of the user conducting the search. This typically occurs because the search ranking algorithms do not take into account the intent of the user conducting the search. It would therefore be an improvement over the prior art to exclude undesirable products, from the user's perspective, from the search result rankings, even though those products may have a high popularity.


The prior art is thus characterized by several disadvantages that are addressed by the present disclosure. The present disclosure minimizes, and in some aspects eliminates, the above-mentioned failures, and other problems, by utilizing the methods and structural features described herein.


The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the present disclosure without undue experimentation. The features and advantages of the present disclosure may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the disclosure will become apparent from a consideration of the subsequent detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a product recommendation system according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a representation of an exemplary webpage for display on a user device according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 depicts sorting a ranked product list based on a user's online interactions according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure; and



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a process for sorting a ranked product list based on a user's online interactions according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles in accordance with the disclosure, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe them. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and any additional applications of the principles of the disclosure as illustrated herein, which would normally occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure claimed.


In describing and claiming the present disclosure, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “having,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.


In an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure provides systems and processes for re-ordering a set of ranked search results based on a user's predicted intent. For example, in one or more embodiments, a search query may be defined by a targeted user through a search engine interface provided in a web browser running on a user device. In response to the search query, the search engine may generate search results in the form of a ranked search results list. The ranking of the search results list may be based on popularity. Prior to displaying the search results to the targeted user, the present disclosure may locally sort or re-order the ranked search results list based on the targeted user's predicted intent. The locally sorted search results list is then displayed to the targeted user on the user device, such as on an electronic display of the user device. In this manner, the list may be tailored to the targeted user and may result in a higher conversion rate, i.e., product sale. The targeted user may then select one of the items in the list using a selection feature provided on the user computer. The targeted user may complete a check-out procedure to purchase the selected item from the list.


In an illustrative embodiment, the search engine that generates the ranked search results may be a “web search engine.” As is known to those of ordinary skill, a web search engine is a software system running on a server that is designed to search for information on the World Wide Web. A web search engine may be hosted on a website that provides a search interface. Examples of popular web search engines include Google, Yahoo, Dogpile, and Bing. The search results are generally presented in a ranked list of results based on proprietary algorithms. The ranked search results may include a mix of web pages, images, and other types of files. Search engines also maintain real-time information by running an algorithm on a web crawler.


In an illustrative embodiment, the search engine is a “website search engine.” As is known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art, a website search engine that generates search results is a software system running on a server that is designed to search for information on a particular website. That is, many websites offer their own internal search engine that allows users to search only the websites for items of interest. Websites may provide a search engine interface for their internal search engine on the pages of the website. The websites providing the internal search engine feature may be e-commerce websites—i.e., websites that offer products for sale online.


In an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure determines a targeted user's predicted intent from the targeted user's tracked online behavior. In this regard, the present disclosure provides a tracking feature to track the targeted user's online behavior. The target user's online behavior may include a wide range of actions taken online by the target user through a web browser interface, including but not limited to: search terms entered by the user in search engine interfaces, paths selected by the user through a product hierarchy for a website, previous promotions selected by the user, web pages viewed by the user, product pages viewed by the user, product attributes selected by the user, search refinements selected by the user, search refinements entered by the user, the user's website interactions, related products viewed by the user, browsing history, the user's profile, and recent purchases made by the user, and any other online interactions of the user with a website or websites.


In an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure provides a computer server that is operable to track users' online interactions with websites. For example, the computer server may track a targeted user's website interactions used to locate a product or group of products on the website. The computer server may track a wide range of website interactions taken online by the targeted user, including but not limited to: search terms entered by the user in a search engine interface provided on the website, a path selected by the user through a graphical product hierarchy provided on the website, previous promotions selected by the user on the website, web pages viewed by the user on the website, product pages viewed by the user on the website, product attributes selected by the user, search refinements selected by the user, search refinements entered by the user, the user's website interaction, related products viewed by a user, browsing history, user profile, and recent purchases.


In an illustrative embodiment, the present disclosure provides a computer server that is operable to perform a localized sort of ranked products based on users' online interactions. In particular, the user may perform a request on a website that returns a ranked product list. The ranked product list may include products ranked in order of popularity. For example, the user may perform a search request on the website using search terms or clicking a refinement link. The computer server may generate a ranked product list, with the most popular or relevant product being at the top of the list and the least popular or relevant product being at the bottom of the list. Prior to presenting the ranked product list to the user, the computer server may perform a localized sort of the ranked product list based on the user's predicted intent.


In an illustrative embodiment, the computer server performs a localized sort of a ranked product list based on a target user's predicted intent. To determine the target user's predicted intent, the computer server matches tracked online interactions of the target user to past users' online interactions. For example, if past users with matching online interactions selected the third item in the ranked list, then the localized sort conducted by the computer server may place this item, the third item, at the top of the list actually presented to the targeted user using a localized sort. This is true even though the third item in the ranked product list is third in overall popularity. But, because of the tracked user online interactions, the localized sort conducted by the computer server places the third most popular item at the top of the product list actually presented to the target user.


In an illustrative embodiment, the computer server locally sorts ranked product lists based on predicted user intent by matching the target user's online interactions to the online interactions of past users. The ranked product list may be generated based on overall popularity on the website. For example, best-selling products on the website may be positioned at the top of the ranked list. The local sort may promote products above their position in the ranked product list and may demote products below their position in the ranked product list. In this manner, the present disclosure provides a customized product list to the targeted users based on the predicted intent of the target users.


In an illustrative embodiment, the computer server locally sorts ranked product lists based on predicted user intent by matching the target user's online refinement selections to the online refinement interactions of past users. Available online refinement selections may be presented on web pages of the website in the form of selectable icons. Online refinement selections may include product attributes, product uses, product categories, product sizes, product prices, product materials, or any other refinement selection that may be utilize to refine a group of products. The online product refinement selections may be selected by users through a selection feature provided on a website, such as a mouse and pointer that allows users to select graphical icons displayed on a web page. Online product refinements may also include search terms entered by users in a search engine interface provided on the website.


Referring now to FIG. 1, there is depicted a product recommendation system 100 for providing product recommendations to targeted users in an online environment according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure. According to an illustrative embodiment, the product recommendation system 100 is positioned to provide product recommendations on an online website, sometimes referred to as an e-commerce website, to targeted users.


The system 100 includes an online retailer or wholesale services e-commerce server 102 that includes a processor 104 and memory 106. One or more user computers or devices 108 are positioned remotely from and in communication with the server 102 through an electronic communication network 110, such as the Internet or other computer network.


As understood by those skilled in the art, the memory 106 of the server 102 can include volatile and nonvolatile memory including, for example, RAM, ROM, and magnetic or optical disks, just to name a few. It should also be understood by those skilled in the art that although illustrated as a single server, the illustrated configuration of the server 102 is given by way of example and that other types of servers or computers configured according to various other methodologies known to those skilled in the art can be used.


The server 102 shown schematically in FIG. 1 represents a server or server cluster or server farm and is not limited to any individual physical server. The server site may be deployed as a server farm or server cluster managed by a server-hosting provider. The number of servers and their architecture and configuration may be increased based on usage, demand, and capacity requirements for the system 100. Similarly, the database servers (not shown) each represent a server or server cluster or server farm and are not limited to any individual physical server or configuration.


As also understood by those skilled in the art, user devices 108 may be a processer-based device, such as one of a laptop, desktop, personal digital assistants or PDAs, smart phones, cell phones, servers, computers, or other types of computers. Each of the user devices 108 is web-enabled, meaning that the user devices 108 may run a web browser for accessing websites over the network as is known to those of ordinary skill in the art.


In an illustrative embodiment, the server 102 includes an e-commerce program 112 stored in the memory 106. The e-commerce program 112 is operable to provide an e-commerce website on the network 110 that offers product for sale through online purchasers. In this regard, the program 112 may provide web pages for display on the user devices 108 in a web browser. The web pages may display product listings for products offered for sale on the website as is known to those of ordinary skill. The information for the product listings may be generated from a product database maintained on an electronic storage medium connected to the server 102. The product listings may include images and descriptive information about the products offered for sale on the e-commerce website. The product listings may also include pricing information and user reviews.


The products, or product listings, may be organized according to a product hierarchy defined in the database. The product hierarchy organizes the products offered for sale by product attributes as is known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Interactive links provided on the website may allow users to navigate the product hierarchy by narrowing or expanding a product search.


The e-commerce program 112 may further provide a search engine feature that allows users to locate desired products by formulating search queries. In an illustrative embodiment, the search engine may provide a search box that allows users to define search parameters by entering search terms. The search engine may conduct a search for product listings in the database based on the search terms. The search engine may generate a list of ranked search results. The ranked search results include the most popular or highest ranked product listings at the top of the list and the lower ranked product listings in descending order.


The e-commerce program 112 may further provide a tracking feature that is operable to track targeted users' online interactions with the system 100. The program 112 may cause the tracked movements of the targeted users to be stored in a database on an electronic storage medium in association with each user. For example, the tracked user movements may be stored under a unique ID, such as a cookie ID, associated with each user. In an illustrative embodiment, the tracked movements of the targeted users include, but are not limited to, search terms entered by the user in search engine interfaces, paths selected by the user through a product hierarchy for a website, previous promotions selected by the user, web pages viewed by the user, product pages viewed by the user, product attributes selected by the user, search refinements selected by the user, search refinements entered by the user, the user's website interactions, related products viewed by the user, browsing history, the user's profile, and recent purchases made by the user, and any other online interactions of the user with a website or websites.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is depicted a webpage 200 generated by the server 102 according to an illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure. The webpage 200 may be part of an e-commerce website hosted by the server 102. The webpage 200 is displayed on a user device 108 in response to a request. According to an illustrative embodiment, the webpage 200 may provide user tools or features that allow users to locate desirable products. In an illustrative embodiment, the webpage 200 may provide a search feature, including a search box 202. The search box 202 allow users to enter search terms to find desirable products. In an illustrative embodiment, the webpage 200 may also provide a searchable product hierarchy 204. The product hierarchy 204 may include groups of products categorized together by attributes. The searchable product hierarchy 204 may include user selectable links that launch a product hierarchy search. For example, the selectable links may include product descriptions, such as watches, electronics, toys, etc.


Once a user selects a link in the product hierarchy 204 or conducts a text search through the search box 202, the user may be able to further refine product selections by product attributes, referred to herein as product refinements. In an illustrative embodiment, product attributes may include size, color, functionality, purpose, price, quantity, manufacturer, brand, components, and features that affect the product's appeal or acceptance in the marketplace. Users may use the product hierarchy 204 and the search box 202 in combination, or separately, to find a product listing for a desired product.


Referring now to FIG. 3, using the website features, the user may cause the program 112 to generate a preliminary list 300 of product listings. For purposes of this disclosure, the list 300 is depicted as having ten items, Product Listings A-J. It will be appreciated that the list 300 may have more or fewer items.


The Product Listings A-J in the list 300 are organized according to product rank such that the list is considered a ranked product list. In FIG. 3, Product Listing A is the top ranked while Product Listing J is the lowest ranked item in the list. The list ranking may be based on a popularity ranking, which may include, but is not limited to: best sellers, most viewed, best priced, etc. However, the list 300 is preliminary in the sense that the list is not organized specific to the user. Still referring to FIG. 3, the program 112 may re-sort the list 300 into list 302 based on the targeted user's tracked online behavior. It will be noted that re-sorted listed 302 is displayed on a webpage on a display of the user device 108 and not the list 300. In this regard, the operation of the program 112 to re-sort the list 300 into list 302 is invisible to the user.


Referring now to FIG. 4, there is depicted a flow-diagram 400 of the steps taken by the program 112, when executed by the processor 104, to re-sort a ranked product list to form a sorted ranked product list. At step 402, the program 112 tracks a targeted user's online interactions. In an illustrative embodiment, the targeted user is an online visitor to an e-commerce website. This step may include tracking search terms entered by the user in search engine interfaces, paths selected by the user through a product hierarchy of a website, previous promotions selected and viewed by the user, web pages viewed by the user, product pages viewed by the user, product attributes selected by the user, search refinements selected by the user, search refinements entered by the user, the user's website interactions, related products viewed by the user, browsing history, the user's profile, and recent purchases made by the user, and any other online interactions of the user with a website or websites.


At step 404, the program 112 generates a ranked list of items, such as product listings, in response to a user's action on the website. The ranked list may be generated based on a search request formed by a user. The ranked list may be generated in response to the user selecting a link or icon on the website. The list may contain a ranked list of product listings as explained above. For example, the list of product listings may be ranked based on overall popularity on the website. The top item in the list may be the most popular item, i.e., the bestselling product.


At step 406, the program 112 matches the targeted user's tracked online behavior to the tracked online behavior of previous users who have requested the same or similar list on the website.


At step 408, the program 112 determines which of the items in the ranked list are most popular among the matched users identified in the previous step.


At step 410, the program 112 re-sorts the items in the ranked list such that the top ranked items in the list are those found to be most popular or relevant to previous users whose online interactions match those of the targeted user. Thus, it will be appreciated that the present disclosure presents a customized list to each targeted user.


At step 412, the program 112 generates a web page with the re-sorted list and transmits it to the targeted user's device for display. The targeted user may select one of the items in the list for purchase through the e-commerce website.


As further understood by those skilled in the art, the program 112 can be in the form of microcode, programs, routines, and symbolic languages that provide a specific set or sets of ordered operations that control the functioning of the hardware and direct its operation, as known and understood by those skilled in the art. The program 112, according to an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, also need not reside in its entirety in volatile memory, but can be selectively loaded, as necessary, according to various methodologies as known and understood by those skilled in the art.


As further understood by those skilled in the art, the term “computer-readable medium” encompasses distribution media, intermediate storage media, execution memory of a computer, and any other medium or device capable of storing the program 112 implementing the functionality or processes of various embodiments of the present invention for later reading by a computer. The program 112 can be copied from the computer-readable medium to a hard disk or a similar intermediate storage medium. When the program 112, or portions thereof, are to be run, it can be loaded either from its distribution medium or its intermediate storage medium into the execution memory of the computer, configuring the computer to act in accordance with the functionality or method of various embodiments of this invention. All such operations are well known to those skilled in the art of computer systems.


According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the program 112 can include a set of instructions that, when executed by the processor 104, causes the server 102, to perform the operations of: providing a user one or more product recommendations regarding products for sale on an e-commerce server associated with the system 100. The product recommendations may be displayed to users on the remote computers or devices 108 on a webpage, as viewed, for example, on a display of one or more remote user computers or devices 108, through the communication network 110, e.g., Internet.


To generate product recommendations, the program 112 causes the server 102 to track, using an electronic database, user interactions with an e-commerce website. The tracked information may include information regarding the steps users take to locate a product or products on an e-commerce website. For example, the tracked information may include tracking the search terms utilized by a user to locate a product. The tracked information may include a path through an online product catalog that a user selects to locate a product. The tracked information may include promotions clicked on by a user. The tracked information may include product restrictions used by a user to locate a product. The tracked information may include product attribute refinements clicked on by a user to locate a product. Thus, it will be appreciated that the tracked information may include any online behavior or website interactions of a user that is utilized to locate a product.


As will be explained below, the tracked information may be utilized to perform a localized sort of ranked products when a new user exhibits behavior that matches, or is similar to, the behavior of a previous user or group of users.


When a target user visits the e-commerce website, the target user's online behavior and website interactions are also tracked. For example, any website interaction by the user to refine product selection or to search for products is tracked as indicative of the target user's intent. The target user's website interactions are then matched against the website interactions of past users to determine the products that the target user is most likely to be interested in purchasing. Any ranked product list returned to the user is then locally sorted based on this information.


Example

For example, if a targeted user is looking at the entirety of a large online product catalog, the user may see a cubic zirconium (CZ) ring in the first position on the web page and a diamond ring on the tenth position because the CZ ring sells more units. If the user then restricts the catalog by clicking on an engagement rings refinement link, the items would reorder themselves based only on the data available from users who took the same step in restricting the catalog. If the diamond ring is sold to these users more than the CZ ring, it may take the first position, even if the CZ ring has sold more units overall and is ranked highest in popularity. Other actions leading to a localized or path specific sort might be search terms used prior to the display of results, promotions ads clicked on prior to display of results, etc. This is the end of the example.


In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features of the present disclosure are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description of the Disclosure by this reference, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.


It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present disclosure. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present disclosure has been shown in the drawings and described above with particularity and detail, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A system for receiving a search results list from a computer search engine and re-ordering the search results list locally to personalize it to a target user of an e-commerce website, thereby providing product recommendations to the target user of the e-commerce website, said system comprising: a processor;a memory coupled to the processor;one or more user devices positioned remotely from and in communication with a server through an electronic communication network, wherein each user device presents the e-commerce website interface to at least one user, said interface outputting information to said user and receiving information input by said user;computer-readable instructions stored m the memory, that when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the operations of (i) causing the server to track user interactions with the e-commerce website by storing information about user interactions made by one or more individual users on the server, wherein the information stored is associated to individual users by storing the information input on each remote user device by each individual user on the server under a unique ID assigned to each individual user, wherein the tracked user interactions include: product refinements selected by each individual user, related products viewed by the individual user, a navigation path selected by the individual user through a product hierarchy, previous promotions selected by the individual user, product attributes selected by the individual user, the individual user's profile, purchases made by the individual user, and pricing information, (ii) causing the server to generate a list of one or more interactions specific to the target user, by using information stored about the target user, wherein the target user is one of the individual users with information stored under a unique ID by the server, (iii) causing the server to compare the list of the target user's interactions with a list of interactions of previous users to determine a subset of previous users whose previous interactions match those of the target user, (iv) receiving at the server an ordered list of products organized according to product rank generated by a search engine in response to a search query by the target user; (v) causing the server to match the target user's tracked interactions to a subset of the tracked interactions of the subset of previous users whose previous interactions match those of the target user to generate a subset of matched interactions; (vi) causing the server to re-order the ordered list of products based on the product rank among the subset of matched interactions to generate a sorted product list that is specific to the target user and based on the matched previous user interactions to said target user, and (vii) causing the server to display the sorted product list instead of the ordered list on a remote target user device in response to the search query made by the target user on the remote target user device.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the list of product listings is a ranked list of product listings.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the list of product listings is ranked, prior to sorting, by sales volume, highest to lowest.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise search terms utilized to define a search request by the target user.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise webpages viewed by the target user.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise product listings viewed by the target user.
  • 7. A method of receiving a search results list from a computer search engine and re-ordering the search results list to personalize it to a target user of an e-commerce website, thereby providing product recommendations to a user of an e-commerce website, said method comprising: presenting an interface generated by the e-commerce website on one or more user devices positioned remotely from and in communication with a server through an electronic communication network, wherein each user device presents the e-commerce website interface to at least one user, said interface outputting information to said user and receiving information input by said user;tracking user interactions with the e-commerce website made by one or more individual users interacting with the interface of the e-commerce website presented on each individual user's user device by storing information about the interactions with the e-commerce website on a server under a unique ID for each individual user, wherein the tracked interactions of each user include the following: product refinements selected by the individual user, related products viewed by the individual user, a navigation path selected by the individual user through a product hierarchy, previous promotions selected by the individual user, product attributes selected by the individual user, the individual user's profile, purchases made by the individual user, and pricing information;generating a list of one or more of a target user's interactions, using information stored about the target user on the server, wherein the target user is one of the individual users with information stored under a unique ID by the server;comparing the list of the target user's interactions with a list of the interactions of previous users to determine a subset of previous users whose interactions match those of the target user;receiving at the server an ordered list of products organized according to product rank generated in response to a search query by the target user;matching the target user's tracked interactions to a subset of the tracked interactions of the subset of previous users whose previous interactions match those of the target user to generate a subset of matched interactions to determine the target user's intent, wherein the subset of the tracked interactions of the subset of previous users whose interactions match those of the target user is stored on the server;re-ordering the ordered list of products based on the product rank among the subset of matched interactions specific to the target user, and based on the matched previous user interactions to said target user, to generate a sorted list of product listings specifically targeted to the user; anddisplaying the sorted list of product listings instead of the ordered list on a remote target user device in response to the search query made by the target user on the remote target user device.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the list of product listings is a ranked list of product listings.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the list of product listings is ranked, prior to sorting, by sales volume, highest to lowest.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise search terms utilized to define a search request by the target user.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise web pages viewed by the target user.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise product listings viewed by the target user.
  • 13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium for reading by a computer comprising computer-readable instructions operable to (i) cause a server to track user interactions with an interface generated by an e-commerce website and presented on one or more user devices positioned remotely from and in communication with the server through an electronic communication network, wherein each user device presents the e-commerce website interface to at least one user, and said interface outputs information to said user and receives information input by said user, by storing information about the interactions of each individual user with the e-commerce website on a server under a unique ID assigned to each individual user and generate a list of one or more interactions specific to a target user: wherein the interactions tracked by the e-commerce website include the following: product refinements selected by the user, related products viewed by the user, a navigation path selected by the user through a product hierarchy, previous promotions selected by the user, product attributes selected by the user, the user's profile, purchases made the user, and pricing information; (ii) compare the list of the target user's interactions with a list of interactions of previous users, (iii) receive at the server an ordered list of products organized according to product rank in response to a search query by a target user; (iv) use stored information about previous users to determine a subset of previous users whose previous interactions match those of the target user; (v) match a target user's tracked interactions to a subset of tracked interactions of the subset of previous users whose previous interactions match those of the target user to generate a subset of matched interactions; (vi) use the server to re-order the ordered list of products based upon the product rank among the subset of matched interactions to generate a sorted product list specific to the target user and based on the matched previous user interactions to said target user; and (vii) display the sorted product list instead of the ordered list on a remote target user device in response to the search query made by the target user on the remote target user device.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the list of product listings is a ranked list of product listings.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise search terms utilized to define a search request by the target user.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the tracked target user's interactions comprise product listings viewed by the target user.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/213,755, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/798,502, filed Mar. 15, 2013, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, including but not limited to those portions that specifically appear hereinafter, the incorporation by reference being made with the following exception: In the event that any portions of the above-referenced applications are inconsistent with this application, this application supercedes the above-referenced applications.

US Referenced Citations (539)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4808987 Takeda et al. Feb 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4854516 Yamada Aug 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
RE33316 Katsuta et al. Aug 1990 E
5027110 Chang et al. Jun 1991 A
5053956 Donald et al. Oct 1991 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5301350 Rogan et al. Apr 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5347632 Filepp et al. Sep 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5377354 Scannell et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5407433 Loomas Apr 1995 A
5411483 Loomas et al. May 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5493677 Balogh et al. Feb 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5579471 Barber et al. Nov 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5621790 Grossman et al. Apr 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5657389 Fouvener Aug 1997 A
5664111 Nahan et al. Sep 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5721908 Lagarde et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5737599 Rowe et al. Apr 1998 A
5760917 Sheridan Jun 1998 A
5761496 Hattori Jun 1998 A
5761655 Hoffman Jun 1998 A
5761662 Dasan Jun 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5778367 Wesinger, Jr. et al. Jul 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794216 Brown Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5796395 de Hond Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5890175 Wong et al. Mar 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5907547 Foladare et al. May 1999 A
5913215 Rubinstein et al. Jun 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5948040 DeLorme et al. Sep 1999 A
5948061 Merriman et al. Sep 1999 A
5970490 Morgenstern Oct 1999 A
5974396 Anderson et al. Oct 1999 A
5974412 Hazlehurst et al. Oct 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5987446 Corey et al. Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
5999915 Nahan et al. Dec 1999 A
6012053 Pant et al. Jan 2000 A
6029141 Bezos et al. Feb 2000 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6045447 Yoshizawa et al. Apr 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6049797 Guha Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058379 Odom et al. May 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6058428 Wang et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6065041 Lum et al. May 2000 A
6070125 Murphy et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6078914 Redfern Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6128649 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6141010 Hoyle Oct 2000 A
6167382 Sparks et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185558 Bowman Feb 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199077 Inala et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6202061 Khosla et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226412 Schwab May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6269238 Iggulden Jul 2001 B1
6271840 Finseth et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275820 Navin-Chandra et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275829 Angiulo et al. Aug 2001 B1
6356879 Aggarwal et al. Mar 2002 B2
6356905 Gershman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356908 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366899 Kernz Apr 2002 B1
6370527 Singhai Apr 2002 B1
6373933 Sarkki et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374260 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381510 Amidhozour et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415270 Rackson Jul 2002 B1
6415320 Hess et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434556 Levin et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456307 Bates et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460020 Pool et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466917 Goyal et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484149 Jammes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489968 Ortega et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522955 Colborn Feb 2003 B1
6523037 Monahan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6601061 Holt et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604107 Wang Aug 2003 B1
6625764 Dawson Sep 2003 B1
6643696 Davis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661431 Stuart et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665838 Brown et al. Dec 2003 B1
6675178 Chinchar Jan 2004 B1
6694436 Audebert Feb 2004 B1
6701310 Sugiura et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718536 Dupaquis Apr 2004 B2
6725268 Jackel et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728704 Mao et al. Apr 2004 B2
6732161 Hess et al. May 2004 B1
6732162 Wood et al. May 2004 B1
6801909 Delgado et al. Oct 2004 B2
6856693 Hurwitz Feb 2005 B2
6889054 Himmel et al. May 2005 B2
6907401 Mittal et al. Jun 2005 B1
6912505 Linden Jun 2005 B2
6978273 Bonneau et al. Dec 2005 B1
7043450 Velez et al. May 2006 B2
7069242 Sheth et al. Jun 2006 B1
7076453 Jammes et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076504 Handel et al. Jul 2006 B1
7080030 Eglen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099891 Harris et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100111 McElfresh et al. Aug 2006 B2
7100195 Underwood Aug 2006 B1
7117207 Kerschberg et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127416 Tenorio Oct 2006 B1
7165091 Lunenfeld Jan 2007 B2
7167910 Farnham et al. Jan 2007 B2
7216115 Walters et al. May 2007 B1
7240016 Sturgis Jul 2007 B1
7254547 Beck et al. Aug 2007 B1
7305614 Chen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7318037 Solari Jan 2008 B2
7324966 Scheer Jan 2008 B2
7340249 Moran et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349668 Ilan et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353188 Yim et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366755 Cuomo et al. Apr 2008 B1
7379890 Myr et al. May 2008 B2
7380217 Gvelesiani May 2008 B2
7383320 Silberstein et al. Jun 2008 B1
7401025 Lokitz Jul 2008 B1
7447646 Agarwal et al. Nov 2008 B1
7451476 Banks Nov 2008 B1
7454464 Puthenkulam et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457730 Degnan Nov 2008 B2
7493521 Li et al. Feb 2009 B1
7496525 Mitchell Feb 2009 B1
7496527 Silverstein et al. Feb 2009 B2
7496582 Farnham et al. Feb 2009 B2
7516094 Perkowski Apr 2009 B2
7539696 Greener et al. May 2009 B1
7546625 Kamangar Jun 2009 B1
7552067 Nephew et al. Jun 2009 B2
7565615 Ebert Jul 2009 B2
7606743 Orzell et al. Oct 2009 B2
7610212 Klett et al. Oct 2009 B2
7653573 Hayes, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 B2
7834883 Adams Nov 2010 B2
7904348 Johnson et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912748 Rosenberg et al. Mar 2011 B1
7921031 Crysel Apr 2011 B2
7941751 Ebert May 2011 B2
7979340 MacDonald Korth et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983950 DeVita Jul 2011 B2
7983963 Byrne et al. Jul 2011 B2
8086643 Tenorio Dec 2011 B1
8112303 Eglen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8140989 Cohen et al. Mar 2012 B2
8166155 Rachmeler et al. Apr 2012 B1
8204799 Murray et al. Jun 2012 B1
8214264 Kasavin et al. Jul 2012 B2
8214804 Robertson Jul 2012 B2
8260852 Cselle Sep 2012 B1
8312056 Peng et al. Nov 2012 B1
8326662 Byrne et al. Dec 2012 B1
8370269 MacDonald-Korth et al. Feb 2013 B2
8370435 Bonefas Feb 2013 B1
8392356 Stoner et al. Mar 2013 B2
8452691 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2013 B2
8473316 Panzitta et al. Jun 2013 B1
8494912 Fraser et al. Jul 2013 B2
8545265 Sakamoto et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577740 Murray et al. Nov 2013 B1
8583480 Byrne Nov 2013 B2
8630960 Gross Jan 2014 B2
8676632 Watson et al. Mar 2014 B1
8693494 Fiatal Apr 2014 B2
8719075 MacDonald Korth et al. May 2014 B2
8793650 Hilerio et al. Jul 2014 B2
9047341 Pan Jun 2015 B2
9047642 Byrne et al. Jun 2015 B2
9448692 Mierau Sep 2016 B1
9483788 Martin Nov 2016 B2
9741080 Byrne Aug 2017 B1
9747622 Johnson et al. Aug 2017 B1
9805425 MacDonald-Korth et al. Oct 2017 B2
9928752 Byrne et al. Mar 2018 B2
9940659 Behbahani Apr 2018 B1
10074118 Johnson et al. Sep 2018 B1
10102287 Martin Oct 2018 B2
10269081 Byrne Apr 2019 B1
10423997 MacDonald Korth et al. Sep 2019 B2
10534845 Noursalehi et al. Jan 2020 B2
10769219 Martin Sep 2020 B1
10810654 Robertson et al. Oct 2020 B1
20010014868 Herz et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034667 Petersen Oct 2001 A1
20010034668 Whitworth Oct 2001 A1
20010044751 Pugliese et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047290 Petras et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047308 Kaminsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010051996 Cooper et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002513 Chiasson Jan 2002 A1
20020007356 Rice et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013721 Capel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019763 Linden Feb 2002 A1
20020022995 Miller et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023059 Bari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026390 Ulenas et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029187 Meehan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038312 Donner et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020040352 McCormick Apr 2002 A1
20020042738 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049622 Lettich et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020056044 Andersson May 2002 A1
20020099578 Eicher et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099579 Scelzo et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099602 Moskowitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107718 Morrill et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020107853 Hofmann et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111826 Potter Aug 2002 A1
20020120537 Campbell et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123957 Notarius et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124100 Adams Sep 2002 A1
20020129282 Hopkins Sep 2002 A1
20020133502 Rosenthal Sep 2002 A1
20020138399 Hayes et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147625 Kolke Oct 2002 A1
20020156802 Takayama et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161648 Mason et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020188777 Kraft et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194049 Boyd Dec 2002 A1
20020198784 Shaak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198882 Linden et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004855 Dutta et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005046 Kavanagh et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009362 Cifani et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009392 Perkowski Jan 2003 A1
20030014400 Siegel Jan 2003 A1
20030028451 Ananian Feb 2003 A1
20030028605 Millett et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032409 Hutcheson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035138 Schilling Feb 2003 A1
20030036914 Fitzpatrick et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040970 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030041008 Grey et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046149 Wong Mar 2003 A1
20030069740 Zeidman Apr 2003 A1
20030069790 Kane Apr 2003 A1
20030069825 Burk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088467 Culver May 2003 A1
20030088511 Karboulonis et al. May 2003 A1
20030093331 Childs et al. May 2003 A1
20030097352 Gutta et al. May 2003 A1
20030105682 Dicker et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110100 Wirth, Jr. Jun 2003 A1
20030119492 Timmins et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030083961 Bezos et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030131095 Kumhyr et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139969 Scroggie et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140007 Kramer Jul 2003 A1
20030140121 Adams Jul 2003 A1
20030158792 Perkowski Aug 2003 A1
20030163340 Fitzpatrick et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167213 Jammes et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030167222 Mehrotra et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177103 Ivanov et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187745 Hobday et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200156 Roseman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204449 Kotas et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030217002 Enborg Nov 2003 A1
20030220835 Barnes, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20040006509 Mannik et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015416 Foster et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040029567 Timmins et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040041836 Zaner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040044563 Stein Mar 2004 A1
20040055017 Delpuch et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058710 Timmins et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073476 Donahue et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078388 Melman Apr 2004 A1
20040107136 Nemirofsky et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117242 Conrad et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122083 Lippert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122681 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122735 Meshkin Jun 2004 A1
20040122855 Ruvolo et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128183 Challey et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128283 Wang Jul 2004 A1
20040128320 Grove et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143731 Audebert Jul 2004 A1
20040148232 Fushimi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172323 Stamm Sep 2004 A1
20040172379 Mott et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174979 Hutton et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186766 Fellenstein et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199496 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199905 Fagin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204989 Dicker Oct 2004 A1
20040204991 Monahan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040230989 Macey Nov 2004 A1
20040240642 Crandell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249727 Cook, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267717 Slackman Dec 2004 A1
20050010925 Khawand et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021666 Dinnage et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038733 Foster et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044254 Smith Feb 2005 A1
20050055306 Miller et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060664 Rogers Mar 2005 A1
20050097204 Horowitz et al. May 2005 A1
20050114229 Ackley et al. May 2005 A1
20050120311 Thrall Jun 2005 A1
20050131837 Sanctis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144064 Calabria et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050193333 Ebert Sep 2005 A1
20050197846 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197950 Moya et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198031 Pezaris et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202390 Allen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203888 Woosley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216300 Appelman et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050262067 Lee et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273378 Macdonald-Korth et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009994 Hogg et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010105 Sarukkai et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015498 Sarmiento Jan 2006 A1
20060031240 Eyal et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041638 Whittaker et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058048 Kapoor et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069623 MacDonald-Korth et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060085251 Greene Apr 2006 A1
20060173817 Chowdhury et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206479 Mason Sep 2006 A1
20060230035 Bailey et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060235752 Kavanagh et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259360 Flinn et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271671 Hansen Nov 2006 A1
20060282304 Hansen Nov 2006 A1
20070005424 Arauz Jan 2007 A1
20070027760 Collins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027814 Tuoriniemi Feb 2007 A1
20070073641 Perry et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070077025 Mino Apr 2007 A1
20070078726 MacDonald Korth et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070078849 Slothouber Apr 2007 A1
20070083437 Hamor Apr 2007 A1
20070094597 Rostom Apr 2007 A1
20070100803 Cava May 2007 A1
20070130090 Staib et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070160345 Sakai et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070162379 Skinner Jul 2007 A1
20070174108 Monster Jul 2007 A1
20070192168 Van Luchene Aug 2007 A1
20070192181 Asdourian Aug 2007 A1
20070206606 Coleman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214048 Chan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226679 Jayamohan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233565 Herzog et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239534 Liu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070245013 Saraswathy et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070260520 Jha et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282666 Afeyan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288298 Gutierrez Dec 2007 A1
20070299743 Staib et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015938 Haddad et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021763 Merchant Jan 2008 A1
20080052152 Yufik Feb 2008 A1
20080071640 Nguyen Mar 2008 A1
20080082394 Floyd et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103893 Nagarajan et al. May 2008 A1
20080120342 Reed May 2008 A1
20080126205 Evans et al. May 2008 A1
20080126476 Nicholas et al. May 2008 A1
20080133305 Yates et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140765 Kelaita et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162574 Gilbert Jul 2008 A1
20080195476 Marchese et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201218 Broder et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215456 West et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080288338 Wiseman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294536 Taylor et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300909 Rikhtverchik et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301009 Plaster et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080305869 Konforty Dec 2008 A1
20080313010 Jepson Dec 2008 A1
20090006190 Lucash et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030755 Altberg et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030775 Vieri Jan 2009 A1
20090037355 Brave Feb 2009 A1
20090106080 Carrier et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106127 Purdy et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119167 Kendall et al. May 2009 A1
20090157537 Miller Jun 2009 A1
20090164323 Byrne Jun 2009 A1
20090182589 Kendall et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204848 Kube et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222348 Ransom et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090222737 Liesche Sep 2009 A1
20090234722 Evevsky Sep 2009 A1
20090240582 Sheldon-Neal et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276284 Yost Nov 2009 A1
20090276305 Clopp Nov 2009 A1
20090292677 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090293019 Raffel et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090313173 Singh Dec 2009 A1
20100042684 Broms et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100070448 Omoigui Mar 2010 A1
20100076816 Phillips Mar 2010 A1
20100076851 Jewell, Jr. Mar 2010 A1
20100146413 Phillips Mar 2010 A1
20100094673 Lobo et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107123 Sareen Apr 2010 A1
20100145831 Esfandiari et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100228617 Ransom et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110010656 Mokotov Jan 2011 A1
20110055054 Glasson Mar 2011 A1
20110060621 Weller et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110103699 Ke et al. May 2011 A1
20110131253 Peukert et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145226 Gollapudi Jun 2011 A1
20110153383 Bhattacharjya et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153663 Koren et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110173076 Eggleston Jul 2011 A1
20110191319 Nie et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196802 Ellis et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110225050 Varghese Sep 2011 A1
20110231226 Solden Sep 2011 A1
20110231383 Smyth et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110271204 Jones et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110276513 Erhart et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289068 Teevan Nov 2011 A1
20120005187 Chavanne Jan 2012 A1
20120030067 Pothukuchi et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120084135 Nissan et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120158715 Maghoul et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120164619 Meer Jun 2012 A1
20120166299 Feinstein et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120231424 Calman et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233312 Ramakumar et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120278388 Kleinbart et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284336 Schmeidt et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130031470 Daly, Jr. et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130073392 Allen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080200 Connolly et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080426 Chen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130085893 Bhardwaj et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130144870 Gupta et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145254 Masuko et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151331 Avner et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151388 Falkenborg Jun 2013 A1
20130185164 Pottjegort Jul 2013 A1
20130191409 Zeng Jul 2013 A1
20130254059 Teo Sep 2013 A1
20130268561 Christie et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140019313 Hu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025509 Reisz et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032544 Mathieu et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140114680 Mills et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140136290 Schiestl et al. May 2014 A1
20140172652 Pobbathi et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180758 Agarwal Jun 2014 A1
20140200959 Sarb et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140259056 Grusd Sep 2014 A1
20140289005 Laing et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140337090 Tavares Nov 2014 A1
20140372415 Fernandez-Ruiz Dec 2014 A1
20150019958 Ying et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150287066 Wortley et al. Oct 2015 A1
20170344622 Islam et al. Nov 2017 A1
20200065357 Noursalehi et al. Feb 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (25)
Number Date Country
2253543 Oct 1997 CA
2347812 May 2000 CA
0636993 Apr 1999 EP
0807891 May 2000 EP
1241603 Mar 2001 EP
2397400 Jul 2004 GB
2424098 Sep 2006 GB
2001283083 Oct 2001 JP
2002318935 Oct 2002 JP
2009505238 Feb 2009 JP
9717663 May 1997 WO
9847082 Oct 1998 WO
9849641 Nov 1998 WO
9959283 Nov 1999 WO
0025218 May 2000 WO
0109803 Feb 2001 WO
0182135 Nov 2001 WO
2001097099 Dec 2001 WO
2002037234 Nov 2002 WO
2003094080 Nov 2003 WO
2007021920 Feb 2007 WO
WO2007021920 Feb 2007 WO
2012093410 Jul 2012 WO
WO2015116038 Aug 2015 WO
WO2015176071 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
T. Y. Lee, S. Li and R. Wei, “Needs-Centric Searching and Ranking Based on Customer Reviews,” 2008 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, Washington, DC, 2008, pp. 128-135. (Year: 2008).
Y. K. Choi and S. K. Kim, “An auxiliary recommendation system for repetitively purchasing items in E-commerce,” 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), Bangkok, 2014, pp. 96-98. (Year: 2014).
S. Kulkarni, A. M. Sankpal, R. R. Mudholkarand Kirankumari, “Recommendation engine: Matching individual/group profiles for better shopping experience,” 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT), Rajampet, 2013, pp. 1-6. (Year: 2013).
Haibin Liu, Vlado Ke{hacek over (s)}elj, “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 61, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 304-330 (Year: 2007).
Sumathi et. al., “Automatic Recommendation of Web Pages in Web Usage Mining,” International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 02, No. 09, 2010 (Year: 2010).
2Roam, Inc., multiple archived pages of www.2roam.com retrieved via Internet Archive Wayback Machine on Jun. 10, 2008.
Alt et al., “Bibliography on Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 5 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Alt et al., “Computer Integrated Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 1, No. 3.
Anonymous, Image manipulation (image-editing software and image-manipulation systems)(Seybold Special Report, Part II), Seybold Reporton Publishing Systems, May 15, 1995, p. S35(9), vol. 24, No. 18.
Auctionwatch.Com, multiple pages—including search results for “expedition,” printed Apr. 21, 2011.
Ball et al., “Supply chain infrastructures: system integration and information sharing,” ACM SIGMOD Record, 2002, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 61-66.
Berger et al., “Random Ultipie-Access Communication and Group Testing,” IEEE, 1984.
Braganza, “IS Resarch at Cranfield—A Look at the Future,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Brecht et al., “The IM 2000 Research Programme,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Business Wire business/technology editors, “Sellers Flock to OutletZoo.com as New Automatic Price Drop Method Moves Excess Inventory Online,” Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Expands in Real Estate Market Vvith Adoption of Rimfire on REALTOR.com,” Business Wire, Nov. 8, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “PictureWorks Technology, Inc. Shows Strong Revenue Growth in Internet Imaging Business,” Business Wire, Nov. 10, 1999.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Partners with Pumatech to Delivery Wireless Alerts,” Business Wire, Dec. 18, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Takes eHow's How-to Solutions Wireless: With 2Roam, the Web's One-Stop Source for getting Things Done is on More Wireless Devices, with Ability to Purchase Its Products from Anywhere,” Business Wire, Oct. 2, 2000.
Business Wire business editors/high-tech writers, “2Roam Drives Hertz to the Wireless Web: Number One Car Rental Company to Provide Customers Wireless Access from Any Device,” Business Wire, Aug. 7, 2001.
BUY.COM, www.buy.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Chen et al., “Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices,” ACM, May 20-24, 2003.
Clemons et al., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities markets,” Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems, New York, New York, United States, pp. 53-64, 1991.
FRIENDSTER.COM, homepage and “more info” pages, printed Apr. 29, 2004.
GOOGLE News archive search for “2Roam marketing” performed over the date range 2000-2003.
GOOGLE News archive search for “2Roam SMS” performed over the date range 2000-2008.
Grabowski et al., “Mobile-enabled grid middleware and/or grid gateways,” GridLab—A Grid Application Toolkit and Testbed, Work Package 12—Access for Mobile Users, Jun. 3, 2003.
Graham, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Jul. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 8, No. 2.
Gunthorpe et al., “Portfolio Composition and the Investment Horizon,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 51-56.
Halperin, “Toward a Process Handbook for Organizational Coordination Processes,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Hess et al., “Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, pp. 251-275.
IBM, “Anyonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Mar. 1996, pp. 363-366, vol. 39, No. 3.
IBM, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1995, pp. 83-84, vol. 38, No. 1.
Icrossing, “Icrossing Search Synergy: Natural & Paid Search Symbiosis,” Mar. 2007.
IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. Entire book cited; table of contents, source list, and terms beginning with A included. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2.
Ives et al., “Editor's Comments—MISQ Central: Creating a New Intellectual Infrastructure,” MIS Quarterly, Sep. 1994, p. xxxv.
Joshi, “Information visibility and its effect on supply chain dynamics,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000 (fig. 4.5; p. 45).
Klein, “Information Logistics,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, pp. 11-12, vol. 3, No. 3.
Klein, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 4 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Kubicek, “The Organization Gap,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Kuula, “Telematic Services in Finland,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lalonde, “The EDI World Institute: An International Approach,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Intelligent Electronic Trading for Commodity Exchanges,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Lee et al., “Electronic Brokerage and Electronic Auction: The Impact of IT on Market Structures,” Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1996, pp. 397-406.
Lee, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions,” Electronic Market—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 24-28, vol. 7, No. 4.
LIVE365 press release, “Live365 to Offer Opt-ln Advertising on Its Website,” Oct. 15, 2004.
London Business School, “Overture and Google: Internet Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising Options,” Mar. 2003.
M2 Presswire, “Palm, Inc.: Palm unveils new web browser optimised for handhelds; HTML browser offers high-speed web-browsing option,” Mar. 13, 2002.
Malone et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies,” Communications of the ACM, Jun. 1987, pp. 484-497, vol. 30, No. 6.
Mansell et al., “Electronic Trading Networks: The Route to Competitive Advantage?” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Mardesich, “Onsale takes auction gavel electronic,” Computer Reseller News, Jul. 8, 1996, pp. 2, 32.
Marteau, “Shop with One Click, Anywhere, Anytime,” Information Management and Consulting, 2000, pp. 44-46, vol. 15, No. 4.
Massimb et al., “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity,” Financial Analysts Journal, Jan.-Feb. 1994, pp. 39-49.
McGinnity, “Build Your Weapon,” PC Magazine, Apr. 24, 2001, printed from www.pcmag.com/print_article2?0,1217, a%253D3955,00.asp.
Meade, “Visual 360: a performance appraisal system that's 'fun,'” HR Magazine, 44, 7, 118(3), Jul. 1999.
“MEDIAPPRAISE: Mediappraise Receives National Award for Web-Based Technology That Enables Companies to Solve Thorny HR Problem,” Dec. 14, 1998.
Medvinsky et al., “Electronic Currency for the Internet,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Metails.com, www.metails.com homepage, printed Oct. 13, 2004.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter and p. 33.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Edition, front matter, back matter, and pp. 479, 486.
Neches, “Fast—A Research Project in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 4 pages, vol. 3., No. 3.
Neo, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Dec. 1992, pp. 278-288, vol. 1, No. 5.
O'Mahony, “An X.500-based Product Catalogue,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online: Unique Internet retail services debuts with week-long charity auction for The Computer Museum in Boston,” May 24, 1995, printed from www.dialogweb.com/cgi/dwclient?dwcommand,DWEBPRINT%20810-489267.
“ONSALE joins fray as online shopping pcks up speed: Internet Booms,” Comptuer Reseller News, Jun. 5, 1995.
Palm, Inc., PalmTM Web Pro Handbook, copyright 2002-2003.
Post et al., “Application of Auctions as a Pricing Mechanism for the Interchange of Electric Power,” IEEE Transactions of Power Systems, Aug. 1995, pp. 1580-1584, vol. 10, No. 3.
Preist et al., “Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction,” International Conference on Information and Computation, Proceedings of the first international conference on information and computation economies, Oct. 25-28, 1998, Charleston, United States, pp. 11-18.
Qualcomm, “Brew Developer Support,” printed from web.archive.org/web/20020209194207/http://www.qualcomm.com/brew/developer/support/kb/52.html on Aug. 30, 2007.
RCR Wireless News, “Lockheed Martin to use 2Roam's technology for wireless platform,” RCR Wireless News, Sep. 10, 2001.
Reck, “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System,” J. Systems Software, 1993, pp. 245-252, vol. 21.
Reck, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, pp. 17-23, vol. 7, No. 4.
REPCHECK.COM, www.repcheck.com homepage, printed from web.archive.org/web/20020330183132/http://epcheck.com on Sep. 5, 2009.
Resnick et al., “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 2000, pp. 45-48, vol. 43, No. 12.
Rockoff et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1995, pp. 10-16, vol. 5, No. 4.
Rose, “Vendors strive to undo Adobe lock-hold,” Computer Reseller News, Feb. 5, 1996, n 66669, p. 71(7).
Rysavy, “Mobile-commerce ASPs do the legwork,” Network Computing, Jan. 22, 2001, p. 71, 6 pgs., vol. 12, No. 2.
Saunders, “AdFlight to Offer WAP Ads,” Oct. 17, 2000, printed from clickz.com/487531/print.
Schmid, “Electronic Markets,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Schwankert, “Matsushita Taps 2Roam for Wireless Solutions,” www.internetnews.com/bus-news.article.php/674811, Feb. 2, 2001.
Sen, “Inventory and Pricing Models for Perishable Products,” Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation—University of Southern California, Aug. 2000.
Siegmann, “Nowhere to go but up,” PC Week, Oct. 23, 1995, 3 pages, vol. 12, No. 42.
Telephony Staff, “Air-ASP,” Telephony Online, Oct. 2, 2000, 3 pages.
Teo, “Organizational Factors of Success in Using EDIS: A Survey of Tradenet Participants,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Tjostheim et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web,” printed from www.nr.no/gem/elcom/puplikasjoner/enter98e.html on Jun. 10, 1990, 10 pages.
Turban, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 5 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Ubid.Com, “How do 1 Updated my Address, Phone, Credit Card, Password, etc ?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208113903/www.ubid.com/help/topic13asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
Ubid.Com, “How do I track my shipment?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010331032659/www.ubid.com/help/topic27.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
Ubid.Com, “Can I track all of my bids from My Page?” printed from web.archive.org/web/20010208114049/www.ubid.com/help/topic14.asp on Aug. 30, 2007.
Van Heck et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Dec. 1997, 6 pages, vol. 7, No. 4.
Verizon Wireless, “Verizon Wireless Customers Get It NowSM; Get Games, Get Pix, Get Ring Tones and Get Going in Full Color,” press release to PRNEWSWIRE, Sep. 23, 2002.
Warbelow et al., “AUCNET: TV Auction Network System,” Harvard Business School 9-190-001, Jul. 19, 1989, Rev. Apr. 12, 1996, pp. 1-15.
Weber, “How Financial Markets are Going On-line,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 2 pages, vol. 3, No. 3.
Wireless Internet, “DailyShopper Selects 2Roam to Enable Mobile Customers to Retrieve Nearby Sales and Promotions Information,” Wireless Internet, Apr. 2001.
Wireless Week, “Verizon Wireless Gets Going on BREW Agenda,” Wireless Week, Sep. 23, 2002.
Xchanger.Net, webpage printed from www.auctiva.com/showcases/as_4sale.asp?uid=exchanger, undated but at least as early as Oct. 12, 2000.
Yu et al., “Distributed Reputation Management for Electronic Commerce,” Computational Intelligence, 2002, pp. 535-549, vol. 18, No. 4.
Zetmeir, Auction Incentive Marketing, print of all pages of website found at home.earthlink.net/˜bidpointz/ made Oct. 8, 2004.
Zimmermann, “Integration of Financial Services: The TeleCounter,” Electronic Markets—The International Journal, Oct. 1993, 1 page, vol. 3, No. 3.
Zwass, “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, pp. 3-23, vol. 1, No. 1.
Chen, M. (2007), Knowledge assisted data management and retrieval in multimedia database systems (Order No. 3268643).
Fan, J., Keim, F.A., Gao, Y., Luo, H. and Li, Z. (2009). JustClick: Personalized Image Recommendation via Exploratory Search from Large-Scale Flickr Images. Feb. 2009. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video.
Rodriguez, Camille, HootSuite vs. social Oomph vs. Tweekdeck, Jan. 4, 2012, http://polkadotimpressions.com/2012/01/04/hootsuite-vs-social-oopmphvs.tweetdeck/ (Year: 2012).
Schaffer, Neil, The Top 20 Twitter clients—HootSuite, TweetDeck and More, Jan. 31, 2012, https://maximizesocialbusinss.com/top-20-twitter-clients-2012-9175/ (Year: 2012).
Levy, Michael, and Dhruv Grewal. “Supply chain management in a networked economy.” Journal Retailing 76.4 (2000): 415-429.
Neisser, “Which is better for Social Media Monitoring: TweetDeck or SproutSocial” Mar. 17, 2011, Social Media Examiner, https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/which-is-better-for-social-media-monitoring-tweetdeck-or-sproutsocial/.
Ross, David Frederick, Frederick S. Weston, and W. Stephen. Introduction to supply chain management technologies. CRC Press, 2010.
Message Passing from Wikipedia, archived May 6, 2016, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/message_passing, 4 pages.
Di et al., “A New Implementation for Ontology Mapping Based enterprise Semantic Interoperation,” by Xiaofeng Di and Yushun Fan, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vols. 16-19 (2009), pp. 644-648 (Year:2009).
Nicolle et a., “XML Integration and Toolkit for B2B Applications,” by Christophe Nicolle, Kokou Yetongnon, and Jean-Claude Simon, Journal of Database Management, Oct.-Dec. 2003 (Year: 2003).
V. Aksakalli, Optimizing direct response in Internet display advertising, Elsevier, vol. 11, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2012, pp. 229-240. (Year: 2012).
Gallagher et al. A framework for targeting banner advertising on the internet. IEEE, pp. 265-274 (Year: 1997).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61798502 Mar 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14213755 Mar 2014 US
Child 14806297 US